OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 19 — Sep. 12, 2011
  • pp: 18440–18451
« Show journal navigation

Offset frequency dynamics and phase noise properties of a self-referenced 10 GHz Ti:sapphire frequency comb

Dirk C. Heinecke, Albrecht Bartels, and Scott A. Diddams  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 19, pp. 18440-18451 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.018440


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1602 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

This paper shows the experimental details of the stabilization scheme that allows full control of the repetition rate and the carrier-envelope offset frequency of a 10 GHz frequency comb based on a femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser. Octave-spanning spectra are produced in nonlinear microstructured optical fiber, in spite of the reduced peak power associated with the 10 GHz repetition rate. Improved stability of the broadened spectrum is obtained by temperature-stabilization of the nonlinear optical fiber. The carrier-envelope offset frequency and the repetition rate are simultaneously frequency stabilized, and their short- and long-term stabilities are characterized. We also measure the transfer of amplitude noise of the pump source to phase noise on the offset frequency and verify an increased sensitivity of the offset frequency to pump power modulation compared to systems with lower repetition rate. Finally, we discuss merits of this 10 GHz system for the generation of low-phase-noise microwaves from the photodetected pulse train.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

Frequency-comb sources with mode spacing in the range of tens of gigahertz are of increasing interest for applications in optical frequency metrology, microwave photonics [1

1. C.-B. Huang, Z. Jiang, D. Leaird, J. Caraquitena, and A. Weiner, “Spectral line-by-line shaping for optical and microwave arbitrary waveform generations,” Laser & Photonics Reviews2, 227–248 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], photonic microwave generation [2

2. A. Bartels, S. A. Diddams, C. W. Oates, G. Wilpers, J. C. Bergquist, W. H. Oskay, and L. Hollberg, “Femtosecond-laser-based synthesis of ultrastable microwave signals from optical frequency references,” Opt. Lett. 30, 667–669 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and astronomical [3

3. C.-H. Li, A. J. Benedick, P. Fendel, A. G. Glenday, F. X. Kärtner, D. F. Phillips, D. Sasselov, A. Szentgyorgyi, and R. L. Walsworth, “A laser frequency comb that enables radial velocity measurements with a precision of 1 cm s−1,” Nature 452, 610–612 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and laboratory spectroscopy [4

4. S. A. Diddams, L. Hollberg, and V. Mbele, “Molecular fingerprinting with the resolved modes of a femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Nature 445, 627–630 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In all such applications, the stabilization of the mode frequencies is required. The frequency of the nth frequency comb mode is given by the comb equation νn = n · fR + f 0, where fR is the frequency spacing between comb lines given by the laser repetition rate and f 0 is the carrier-envelope offset frequency. The carrier-envelope offset frequency arises from the difference between phase velocity of the carrier frequency and group velocity of the intra cavity pulse leading to a phase slip between carrier and envelope per round-trip, see e.g. [5

5. S. T. Cundiff, “Phase stabilization of ultrashort optical pulses,” J. Opt. D: Applied Physics 35, R43 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. Therefore stabilization of the mode frequencies requires control over both degrees of freedom: repetition rate and offset frequency. There are many promising approaches to frequency-comb sources with multiple gigahertz mode spacing, including active and passive mode-locking of solid-state or fiber lasers [6

6. F. Quinlan, S. Gee, S. Ozharar, and P. J. Delfyett, “Ultralow-jitter and -amplitude-noise semiconductor-based actively mode-locked laser,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2870–2872 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11

11. A. Martinez and S. Yamashita, “Multi-gigahertz repetition rate passively modelocked fiber lasers using carbon nanotubes,” Opt. Express 19, 6155–6163 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], cavity filtering [12

12. F. Quinlan, G. Ycas, S. Osterman, and S. A. Diddams, “A 12.5 GHz-Spaced Optical Frequency Comb Spanning ¿400 nm for Infrared Astronomical Spectrograph Calibration,” Rev. Sci. Ins. 81, 063105 (2010). [CrossRef]

14

14. T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. Hnsch, and T. Udem, “Fabry-Perot filter cavities for wide-spaced frequency combs with large spectral bandwidth,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 96, 251–256 (2009). [CrossRef]

], microcavities [15

15. P. Del’Haye, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Full Stabilization of a Microresonator-Based Optical Frequency Comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 053903 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17

17. D. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. Diddams, “Brillouin-Enhanced Hyperparametric Generation of an Optical Frequency Comb in a Monolithic Highly Nonlinear Fiber Cavity Pumped by a cw Laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 193902 (2009).

] and electro-optic modulation [18

18. S. Xiao, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of a 20 GHz train of subpicosecond pulses with a stabilized optical-frequency-comb generator,” Opt. Lett. 34, 85–87 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. However, for many of the laser-based approaches, the pulse energy is too low to provide an octave-spanning spectrum, as required for self-referenced stabilization of the offset frequency [19

19. H. Telle, G. Steinmeyer, A. Dunlop, J. Stenger, D. Sutter, and U. Keller, “Carrier-envelope offset phase control: A novel concept for absolute optical frequency measurement and ultrashort pulse generation,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 69, 327–332 (1999). [CrossRef]

, 20

20. D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff, “Carrier-Envelope Phase Control of Femtosecond Mode-Locked Lasers and Direct Optical Frequency Synthesis,” Science 288, 635–639 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. With an octave-spanning spectrum a beat signal directly at the offset frequency can be obtained by frequency-doubling the infrared part of the spectrum and interfering it with the visible part of the spectrum at the same wavelength. With narrower-bandwidth comb sources, it is possible to use optical spectroscopy and higher-order nonlinear optics [21

21. D. C. Heinecke, A. Bartels, T. M. Fortier, D. A. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Optical frequency stabilization of a 10 GHz Ti:sapphire frequency comb by saturated absorption spectroscopy in 87rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 053806 (2009). [CrossRef]

], or auxiliary sources [15

15. P. Del’Haye, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Full Stabilization of a Microresonator-Based Optical Frequency Comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 053903 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] to stabilize f 0, although this adds complexity and removes the benefit of stabilization to well-established microwave references such as commercially available atomic clocks or the global positioning system (GPS).

In a recent report [22

22. A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “10-GHz Self-Referenced Optical Frequency Comb,” Science 326, 681 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] we demonstrated a self-referenced octave-spanning spectrum produced from a 10 GHz mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser. This was accomplished with only 50 pJ pulse energy available for nonlinear broadening, but taking advantage of the fact that the laser produced ∼ 30 fs pulses to provide a peak power of 3.5 kW. Here we provide complete details of the stabilization technique, characteristics of the stabilized signals, and our efforts aimed at improved long-term stability.

In our approach, we use an end-sealed and temperature stabilized microstructured fiber. This allows stable generation of an octave-spanning spectrum and reliable locking of the comb with stable operation for times scales of 1 to 2 hours. The residual phase noise on f 0 is measured and the frequency stability of the comb is characterized in both the free-running and the locked case. The achieved frequency stability for time scales greater than 1 s is limited by the employed microwave references. In addition, we examine the transfer of amplitude noise on the pump laser to phase noise on the offset frequency. For systems of high repetition rate this phase noise is expected to be higher than that for a comparable system with lower repetition rate. Finally, the unique properties of the laser, including its high repetition rate, short pulses and high average power, make it an interesting candidate for high-power low-noise microwave generation. Along these lines, we demonstrate the generation of a 10 GHz microwave signal with 0 dBm power directly from a high-speed, high-power InGaAs photodiode that detects the 10 GHz pulse train.

2. Generation of an octave-spanning continuum

The Ti:sapphire laser used in this work is passively modelocked via the Kerr lens effect and consists of a four-mirror ring cavity with a 30 mm round-trip length corresponding to a repetition rate of 10 GHz. While pumping with 8.5 W, the laser output power is about 1 W and the pulse length is below 30 fs. Due to the high repetition rate the energy per pulse is only 100 pJ. More details about the laser can be found in Ref. [23

23. A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “Passively mode-locked 10 GHz femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser,” Opt. Lett. 33, 1905–1907 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The inset of Fig. 1 shows the schematic of the laser together with the setup for the supercontinuum generation.

Fig. 1 Compact setup for the supercontinuum generation. The zoom in shows the 10 GHz Ti:sapphire laser cavity. AOM: acousto-optic modulator, PZT: piezo-electric transducer to modulate cavity mirror, CL: collimation lens, GTI: negative dispersion Gires-Tournois interferometric mirrors for pulse recompression, λ/2: half-wave plate, M: 60x microscope objective, TS: xyz-translation stage, PCF: 1.5 m of microstructured fiber, CP: temperature-stabilized copper plate, SC: generated supercontinuum.

We use an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) in the pump beam for pump power control. Modulation of the pump power with an AOM as control mechanism for the offset frequency has proven to provide a high feedback bandwidth, e.g. [24

24. T. M. Fortier, A. Bartels, and S. A. Diddams, “Octave-spanning Ti:sapphire laser with a repetition rate ¿ 1 GHz for optical frequency measurements and comparisons,” Opt. Lett. 31, 1011–1013 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For repetition rate tuning, one of the cavity mirrors is mounted on a piezoelectric transducer. In order to achieve sufficient nonlinear broadening in the microstructured fiber, the peak power of the laser pulses coupled into the fiber has to be as large as possible. Therefore the pulses need to be as short as possible and the coupling efficiency has to be maximized. To compensate for the fiber coupling optics the laser output is recompressed and prechirped by a pair of negative-dispersion Gires-Tournois interferometric mirrors. The collimated light is focused with a microscope objective into a commercially available microstructured fiber from NKT Photonics [25

25. Mention of specific trade names is for technical information only and does not constitute an endorsement by NIST.

]. The fiber core has a diameter of 1.5 μm and the zero-dispersion wavelength of the fiber is at 590 nm. The microstructure is end-sealed and the fiber is connectorized and angle polished. This allows a more robust coupling compared to that of a bare fiber tip. The coupling efficiency can exceed 50%. For a coupled power of 550 mW the peak power is about 1.8 kW. With a half-wave plate the polarisation is adjusted for maximum broadening in the microstructured fiber. The supercontinuum spectrum generated in one and a half meters of fiber is shown in Fig. 2. In early experiments [22

22. A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “10-GHz Self-Referenced Optical Frequency Comb,” Science 326, 681 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] the fiber-coupling stability limited the operation of the system to intervals of about ten minutes. The large average power in combination with tight focussing into the small fiber core leads to heating of the fiber and thermal instabilities in coupling efficiency and output polarization. To improve the stability of the supercontinuum, the fiber is thermally connected to a temperature-stabilized copper plate. A slow feedback loop keeps the temperature of the plate and the fiber constant within 5 mK. After coupling light into the fiber and a thermalization period of about one hour, stable coupling over several hours can be achieved.

Fig. 2 Laser spectrum and octave-spanning spectrum (supercontinuum) generated in microstructured fiber. To further demonstrate the possibility of expanding the spectral coverage of the comb, the direct laser output of the laser was doubled in a 50 μm thick BBO crystal and is also shown as the isolated peak near 390 nm.

Figure 2 also shows frequency doubling of the direct laser output in a 50 μm thick beta-barium borate (BBO) crystal. This demonstrates additional potential of this high-repetition frequency comb to cover also near-ultraviolet parts of the spectrum.

3. Measurement and stabilization of the offset frequency

For offset frequency detection we use the f-2f scheme requiring an octave-spanning spectrum. The Michelson interferometer setup, including the signal-processing electronics for offset frequency stabilization, is shown in Fig. 3 (a). Light around 1064 nm is frequency-doubled in a one millimeter long nonlinear potassium niobate crystal (KNbO3). We use birefringent phase-matching and angle tunning of the crystal. To obtain interference with directly generated 532 nm light, both beams have to overlap in wavelength, space, time, and polarization. Since the different wavelengths have different divergence, only parts of the spectrum are well collimated. The dichroic mirror separates the 532 nm part of the continuum in one arm of the interferometer, while light at 1064 nm goes into the second arm. The delay in the second arm is used to adjust the time delay between the interfering spectral components. With a wave plate at 1064 nm the polarization of the IR light is rotated to maximize the frequency doubling efficiency. With a 532 nm bandpass filter, only the interfering parts of the spectrum are selected before being focused on the photodetector. The photodetector is a Si PIN diode with a cutoff frequency above 2 GHz. For most measurements the offset frequency was in the range of 2.7 GHz. After amplifying, the signal is bandpass filtered and mixed down to 925 MHz by using a double-balanced mixer, where the LO port is driven by a synthesizer at a frequency of about 3.7 GHz. After a second amplification step the frequency is divided by a factor of N = 46 down to 20 MHz [26

26. For typical frequency counters the input frequency is limited to a few hundreds of megahertz. Thus, the frequencies to analyze in the range of gigahertz have to be converted to lower values to enable counter measurements. In the process of difference or sum frequency generation in a mixing device the actual frequency fluctuations of the input frequencies are preserved. Using a stable reference frequency this allows to shift frequencies without affecting the frequency stability. In contrast, in a frequency division process the noise density and therefore the frequency fluctuations are reduced by the division factor. This leads to an increase in frequency stability. For the offset frequency stabilization and analysis we use a frequency division step to reduce phase fluctuations making the phase lock more robust by extending the capture range of the phase detector. In the data evaluation we account for this division factor to recover the original offset frequency stability.

]. This signal is used as an input for the offset-frequency phase detector. For characterization we measure the offset frequency with a frequency counter, and the phase-noise power spectral density with a vector signal analyzer. All synthesizers and counters are referenced to the same 10 MHz hydrogen maser signal via a distribution amplifier. To stabilize the offset frequency we use a phase-locked loop (PLL) based on a digital phase detector [27

27. Analog Devices, Ultrahigh Speed Phase/Frequency Discriminator AD9901.

] and the feedback is applied to the AOM modulating the pump power. For the specific operating parameters of the laser used in this experiment we estimate and confirm a tunability in the order of one megahertz change in offset frequency per 10 mW of pump power change. The total range of offset frequency control via the pump power was about 10 MHz. Larger changes in the offset frequency would require re-alignment of the cavity or inclusion of an additional dispersive element.

Fig. 3 (a) Setup for offset frequency detection, locking and analysis consisting of the f-2f interferometer and electronics for signal processing. PCF: microstructured fiber on a temperature-stabilized copper plate, DCM: dichroic mirror, KNbO3: 1 mm long nonlinear potassium niobate crystal, IF: interference filter as optical bandpass at 532 nm with 3 nm bandwidth, PD: SI PIN diode with 2 GHz bandwidth, M: double-balanced mixer, synth I: synthesizer at f = f 0 + 925 MHz, div: frequency divider with N = 46, split: −3 dB/−3 dB signal splitter, VSA: vector signal analyzer. For clarity signal microwave filters and amplifiers are not shown. (b) Repetition rate phase-locked loop and characterization scheme. PD: high-speed photodetector with 10 GHz bandwidth, M: double-balanced mixers for phase detection and frequency down-conversion, synth I: synthesizer at f = fR+10 MHz, synth II: synthesizer at f = fR.

Figure 4 (a) shows spectra of the offset frequency measured with a microwave spectrum analyzer for the free-running system. Sidebands at about 8 MHz are clearly visible, which we attribute to the relaxation oscillation (RO) of the laser average intensity [28

28. A. Yariv, Optical Electronics (Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, 1991), 4th ed.

]. The relatively large frequency of the RO is surprising, but likely a result of the 10 GHz repetition rate. Interestingly, the 8 MHz RO sidebands are not evident in the direct microwave spectrum of the repetition rate, unless the laser is deliberately misaligned. We take this as evidence of the sensitivity of the offset frequency to very small amplitude modulation. In addition, Fig. 4 (a) shows a spectrum where the femtosecond laser shows excess amplitude noise. This is an intermittent phenomenon linked to amplitude noise on the pump laser. Figure 4 (b) shows a 2 MHz zoom into the offset frequency spectrum. The noise on the offset frequency carrier is further addressed in Sec. 6.

Fig. 4 Offset frequency beat signal for the free-running system. (a) Microwave spectra of the unlocked and undivided offset frequency signal at 2.7 GHz taken with 1 MHz resolution bandwidth. The red trace (oe-19-19-18440-i001.jpg) shows a spectrum where the pump laser exhibits excessive amplitude noise. (b) High-resolution zoom (10 kHz resolution bandwidth) in the spectrum of the mixed and divided signal of the offset frequency at the carrier frequency of 20 MHz.

4. Stabilization of the repetition rate frequency

To stabilize the repetition rate, we use about 10 mW of light that is reflected from the wave plate in front of the microstructured fiber and focus it on a high-speed photodetector. The schematic setup is shown in Fig. 3 (b). The 10 GHz microwave signal is amplified and split. One part goes to the phase-locked loop, while the other part is used for analysis. The latter signal is mixed down to 10 MHz and can then be counted. The PLL employs a double-balanced mixer for phase detection between repetition rate and reference synthesizer. A loop filter provides low-pass filtering and adjustable gain. The error signal is fed to a high-voltage amplifier driving the piezoelectric transducer carrying an intracavity mirror.

5. Frequency stability analysis

Both, the divided offset frequency and the mixed-down repetition rate can be measured using frequency counters. In all counter measurements we use a 1 s gate period. Figure 5 (a) shows the behaviour of the free-running system (all phase-locked loops off) over a time span of half an hour. Both frequencies show a large long term drift, where the change of the offset frequency is more than three orders of magnitude larger than the drift of the repetition-rate frequency. The frequency drift can be attributed to temperature changes of the room and the laser base plate. Figure 5 (b) shows the offset frequency and repetition rate of the locked system counted over a period of 45 minutes. The system stays locked for about one and a half hour, before adjustments to the PLLs become necessary to continue operation. The calculated Allan deviations for the free-running and the locked case are shown in Fig. 5 (c). As described in Fig. 3 (a) and (b) four synthesizers are employed: two as references for the phase-locked loops and two for mixing down the frequencies. The stability of the beat signal is then a combination of the stability of both synthesizers and is dominated by the synthesizer that is less stable. The measured fractional instability at one second of the repetition rate and the offset frequency are
σfR(1s)=δfRfR=1.9103Hz10109Hz=1.91013
(1)
σf0(1s)=δf0f0=6103Hz2.7109Hz=2.21012.
(2)
This corresponds to the fractional instability provided by the synthesizers (which we have characterized separately) and the hydrogen maser. Thus, the stability is presently limited by the synthesizers and not by the laser or the phase-locked loops. The Allan deviation for both degrees of freedom follows the τ12 behavior expected for white phase noise, considering a small dead period in the counting process. These data indicate that the repetition rate is ultimately limited by the maser reference, while for the offset frequency the synthesizers add noise and therefore limit the stability to about 2.2 · 10−12 at 1 s. We can expect to improve the offset frequency stability by using better synthesizers.

Fig. 5 (a) Counting record of the offset frequency and the repetition rate for the unlocked system with 1 s gate period. The vertical coordinate axis shows the changes in frequencies. (b) Counting record of the offset frequency and the repetition rate for the locked system with 1 s gate period. c) Calculated Allan deviation for both frequencies. As a guide to the eye, the green line marks a τ12 dependency. The offset frequency data are corrected for the division factor and represent the stability of the actual offset frequency.

An estimate of the optical stability can be made by use of the values for the microwave frequencies fR and f 0 and projecting them into the optical domain via the comb equation. We get a fractional instability of 1.9 · 10−13 at 1 s for the repetition-rate contribution and 1.55 · 10−17 at 1 s for the offset-frequency contribution.

6. Laser amplitude noise to offset frequency phase-noise conversion

While counting a frequency over long periods measures how well the line center is determined depending on the averaging period, a phase-noise analysis gives information of fluctuations on time scales less than 1 s. A low-phase noise is particularly important for the generation of low-phase-noise microwave signals and for metrology applications. For the phase-noise analysis, a vector signal analyzer is used. The vector signal analyzer demodulates the signal at the carrier frequency and then measures the power spectral density of the phase noise. The spectral density of phase fluctuations is measured for the divided offset frequency signal at 20 MHz. Since phase noise scales in a PLL with the carrier frequency, the actual noise density on the offset frequency carrier is recovered by multiplying the measured spectral noise density by the square of the division factor. Integrating from 10 Hz to the cut-off frequency of the spectrum analyzer of 3 MHz gives the integrated or accumulated phase noise over that bandwidth.

Figure 6 (a) shows the phase noise measurement. The bandwidth of the f0 PLL is about 35 kHz, as evident by the peak in the spectrum near this frequency. The integrated phase noise for this measurement is about 3.1 radians. To reduce the phase noise further requires improving the PLL. At low frequencies up to the kilohertz range the noise contributions have thermal, mechanic and electronic origins, but their frequencies are within the servo bandwidth. For higher frequencies the loop gain is reduced due to the limited bandwidth of the AOM and phase shifts or delays in the loop.

Fig. 6 (a) Offset frequency phase noise and integrated phase noise. (b) Amplitude noise of the pump laser and the 10 GHz laser and corresponding noise floors. The measured integrated relative intensity noise for the pump laser and the 10 GHz laser is 0.047% and 0.054%, respectively.

It is interesting to note that the integrated phase noise of three radians is consistent with measurements on the f0 phase noise of a similar ring Ti:sapphire laser operating at 1 GHz repetition rate. In that case, we have obtained an integrated noise that is about 0.32 radians over a comparable bandwidth. The 10-times increase in going to the 10 GHz system is to be expected if laser parameters (other than the reduced air path) are approximately the same. This is clear if we consider that the carrier-envelope phase shifts are similar in magnitude, but is multiplied by the repetition rate according to
f0(t)=ΔΦCE(t)2πfR,
(3)
where ΔΦCE specifies the carrier-envelope phase shift (modulo 2π) of a cavity round-trip (see e.g. [5

5. S. T. Cundiff, “Phase stabilization of ultrashort optical pulses,” J. Opt. D: Applied Physics 35, R43 (2002). [CrossRef]

]). Thus, the repetition rate of the system should also be considered when comparing the integrated carrier envelope phase noise of different frequency-comb systems.

In order to determine noise sources and contributions to the f0 phase noise, we performed a number of amplitude noise measurements at different positions in the system. A major contribution to the phase noise is expected to be the pump laser. To measure amplitude noise (AM) a portion of the light from the pump laser or the 10 GHz laser is focused onto a 125 MHz photodetector and the signal is sent to a vector signal analyzer. The signal analyzer measures a noise power spectral density from 0.6 Hz up to 10 MHz. Figure 6 (b) summarizes these measurements. All measurements including the noise floor measurement show a strong 60 Hz peak and higher harmonics of this peak originating from pick-up from the power line. It is most likely that AM noise on the pump laser with frequencies higher than 100 kHz causes the broadening of the offset frequency shown in Fig. 4. Comparison with the calculated shot noise level shows that there is a shot noise contribution to the noise density for frequencies higher than 10 kHz. Comparing the amplitude noise of the pump and the 10 GHz laser shows a direct transfer of the AM noise. This is consistent with a model for the AM noise transfer used by Harder et al. [29

29. C. Harder, J. Katz, S. Margalit, J. Shacham, and A. Yariv, “Noise equivalent circuit of a semiconductor laser diode,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics QE-18, 333–337 (1982). [CrossRef]

] and applied to Ti:sapphire lasers by Scott et al. [30

30. R. P. Scott, T. D. Mulder, K. A. Baker, and B. H. Kolner, “Amplitude and phase noise sensitivity of modelocked Ti:sapphire lasers in terms of a complex noise transfer function,” Opt. Express 15, 9090–9095 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], which predicts uniform AM-to-AM noise transfer up to the relaxation oscillations frequency. The transfer occurs via changes in gain dynamics, where a change of the pumping rate changes the cavity photon number. Above the RO frequency the level population can no longer follow the changes of the pump rate, leading to a suppression of the noise transfer. Most amplitude noise peaks show up as phase noise on the offset frequency. Again, this is because AM noise also transfers to phase noise up to the RO frequency. We also measure the amplitude noise after the microstructured fiber, and can see that the main effect is an amplification of the noise spectrum in the microstructured fiber. The frequency dependent amplitude-to-phase noise conversion in microstructured fiber has been shown [31

31. T. M. Fortier, J. Ye, S. T. Cundiff, and R. S. Windeler, “Nonlinear phase noise generated in air-silica microstructure fiber and its effect on carrier-envelope phase,” Opt. Lett. 27, 445–447 (2002). [CrossRef]

] to scale linearly with modulation frequency. In addition, there is a peak at 8 MHz, the same frequency where we see large sidebands on the offset frequency beat. This amplitude noise analysis confirms the transfer from pump laser amplitude noise to offset frequency noise.

7. Prospects on shot-noise limited microwave signal generation

Finally we consider the properties of the 10 GHz laser presented here to the generation of ultralow phase noise microwave signals. We have introduced an approach that uses the frequency comb to transfer the exceptional instability of optical frequency references (e.g. ∼ 10−15 [32

32. B. C. Young, F. C. Cruz, W. M. Itano, and J. C. Bergquist, “Visible Lasers with Subhertz Linewidths,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3799–3802 (1999). [CrossRef]

]) to the microwave domain. In this case, the stable optical frequency reference is employed to stabilize the comb modes in the optical domain, and a microwave signal in terms of a photocurrent at the comb repetition rate is generated by detecting the pulse train with a photodetector. This technique has been demonstrated for frequency combs with repetition rates up to 1 GHz, and the desired microwave frequency is obtained via harmonic generation in the photodetector (e.g., 10 GHz signal obtained from the 10th harmonic of a 1 GHz laser) [2

2. A. Bartels, S. A. Diddams, C. W. Oates, G. Wilpers, J. C. Bergquist, W. H. Oskay, and L. Hollberg, “Femtosecond-laser-based synthesis of ultrastable microwave signals from optical frequency references,” Opt. Lett. 30, 667–669 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 33

33. T. M. Fortier, M. S. Kirchner, F. Quinlan, J. Taylor, J. C. Bergquist, T. Rosenband, N. Lemke, A. Ludlow, Y. Jiang, C. W. Oates, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division,” Nat. Photon. 5, 425–429 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. The close-to-carrier phase-noise properties of the generated microwave signal depend on several factors, including the phase noise on the reference and free-running comb, as well as the noise level of the various servo loops involved. However, for solid-state laser sources, the limiting high-frequency noise floor on the microwave signal is typically provided by the shot noise on the photodetected repetition-rate signal. In the ideal case, the shot-noise power increases linearly with the incident optical power, while the microwave signal power scales quadratically with optical power. Thus, the signal-to-noise ratio of the 10 GHz microwave signal increases linearly with the detected light power. However, the onset of saturation due to that large incident peak power in the photodetection process limits the amount of signal power that can be generated [34

34. P.-L. Liu, K. J. Williams, M. Y. Frankel, and R. D. Esman, “Saturation characteristics of fast photodetectors,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques47, 1297–1303 (1999). [CrossRef]

]. This is a particular problem when we consider the detection of high harmonics of the repetition rate. Previously, we have reduced the impact of photodiode saturation by optical filtering a lower-repetition-rate source with a Fabry-Perot cavity [35

35. S. A. Diddams, M. Kirchner, T. Fortier, D. Braje, A. M. Weiner, and L. Hollberg, “Improved signal-to-noise ratio of 10 GHz microwave signals generated with a mode-filtered femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Opt. Express 17, 3331–3340 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]; however, the use of a self-referenced and optically-stabilized 10 GHz frequency comb would eliminate the complication of filtering when 10 GHz signals, or even higher frequencies, are desired.

To evaluate the potential shot-noise floor of signals generated from the 10 GHz laser, we have detected the repetition rate with two different high-speed photodiodes. Figure 7 shows the achieved microwave power at 10 GHz versus photocurrent for GaAs and InGaAs PIN diodes. While the GaAs photodiode has improved responsivity, the 10 GHz power saturates above 3 mA of average photocurrent [34

34. P.-L. Liu, K. J. Williams, M. Y. Frankel, and R. D. Esman, “Saturation characteristics of fast photodetectors,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques47, 1297–1303 (1999). [CrossRef]

]. In the case of the InGaAs photodiode, which was designed specifically for higher power handling [36

36. J. Taylor, S. Datta, A. Hati, C. Nelson, F. Quinlan, A. Joshi, and S. Diddams, “Characterization of power-to-phase conversion in high-speed p-i-n photodiodes,” IEEE Photonics Journal3, 140–151 (2011). [CrossRef]

], we see no evidence of saturation, even at photocurrents of 10 mA. The output of 0 dBm of microwave power is similar to what we were able to achieve with a 5 GHz pulse train produced by a filtered 1 GHz source [35

35. S. A. Diddams, M. Kirchner, T. Fortier, D. Braje, A. M. Weiner, and L. Hollberg, “Improved signal-to-noise ratio of 10 GHz microwave signals generated with a mode-filtered femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Opt. Express 17, 3331–3340 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and should support a shot-noise-limited floor of −162 dBc/Hz.

Fig. 7 Microwave power at 10 GHz versus photocurrent for two different photodetectors. Both photodetectors were terminated with 50 Ω resistors.

8. Conclusion

In this paper we present a detailed discussion of the stabilization of both degrees of freedom of a 10 GHz Ti:sapphire frequency comb. A challenge for implementing a self-referencing scheme for a high-repetition-rate system is the intrinsic low energy per pulse available to drive the nonlinearity of the microstructured fiber. We overcome this issue by using a small-core microstructured fiber that is temperature stabilized to prevent thermal instabilities. This allows the generation of a spectrum spanning a full octave. The offset frequency and the repetition rate can be locked simultaneously by use of standard phase-locked loop techniques. The long-term stability is characterized and we find a stability of the comb that is limited by the hydrogen maser reference. We also measure the transfer of amplitude noise of the pump source to phase noise on the offset frequency and find an increased sensitivity of the offset frequency to pump power modulation compared to that of lower-repetition-rate systems. We also demonstrate the potential of this system for low-noise microwaves at 10 GHz. The high repetition rate allows microwave powers up to 0 dBm without saturating the photodiode.

With further technical improvements the 10 GHz frequency comb can be used as a reliable tool for metrology with a performance that is comparable to that of existing systems. In frequency-comb applications such as astronomical spectrograph calibration as well as mode-resolved spectroscopy, multichannel communication and line-by-line pulseshaping a high repetition rate is beneficial. Here, the 10 GHz frequency comb could prove to be an excellent comb source with a stabilization limited only by its reference, and providing a high repetition rate in combination with femtosecond pulses and high average power.

Acknowledgments

References and links

1.

C.-B. Huang, Z. Jiang, D. Leaird, J. Caraquitena, and A. Weiner, “Spectral line-by-line shaping for optical and microwave arbitrary waveform generations,” Laser & Photonics Reviews2, 227–248 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

A. Bartels, S. A. Diddams, C. W. Oates, G. Wilpers, J. C. Bergquist, W. H. Oskay, and L. Hollberg, “Femtosecond-laser-based synthesis of ultrastable microwave signals from optical frequency references,” Opt. Lett. 30, 667–669 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

C.-H. Li, A. J. Benedick, P. Fendel, A. G. Glenday, F. X. Kärtner, D. F. Phillips, D. Sasselov, A. Szentgyorgyi, and R. L. Walsworth, “A laser frequency comb that enables radial velocity measurements with a precision of 1 cm s−1,” Nature 452, 610–612 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

S. A. Diddams, L. Hollberg, and V. Mbele, “Molecular fingerprinting with the resolved modes of a femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Nature 445, 627–630 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

S. T. Cundiff, “Phase stabilization of ultrashort optical pulses,” J. Opt. D: Applied Physics 35, R43 (2002). [CrossRef]

6.

F. Quinlan, S. Gee, S. Ozharar, and P. J. Delfyett, “Ultralow-jitter and -amplitude-noise semiconductor-based actively mode-locked laser,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2870–2872 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

E. Yoshida and M. Nakazawa, “Wavelength tunable 1.0 ps pulse generation in 1.530–1.555 μm region from PLL, regeneratively modelocked fibre laser,” Electronics Letters 34, 1753–1754 (1998). [CrossRef]

8.

R. Paschotta, L. Krainer, S. Lecomte, G. J. Spühler, S. C. Zeller, A. Aschwanden, D. Lorenser, H. J. Unold, K. J. Weingarten, and U. Keller, “Picosecond pulse sources with multi-GHz repetition rates and high output power,” New Journal of Physics 6, 174 (2004). [CrossRef]

9.

S. Zeller, T. Südmeyer, K. Weingarten, and U. Keller, “Passively modelocked 77 GHz Er:Yb:glass laser,” Electronics Letters 43, 32–33 (2007). [CrossRef]

10.

T. F. Carruthers and I. N. Duling, “10-GHz, 1.3-ps erbium fiber laser employing soliton pulse shortening,” Opt. Lett. 21, 1927–1929 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

A. Martinez and S. Yamashita, “Multi-gigahertz repetition rate passively modelocked fiber lasers using carbon nanotubes,” Opt. Express 19, 6155–6163 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

F. Quinlan, G. Ycas, S. Osterman, and S. A. Diddams, “A 12.5 GHz-Spaced Optical Frequency Comb Spanning ¿400 nm for Infrared Astronomical Spectrograph Calibration,” Rev. Sci. Ins. 81, 063105 (2010). [CrossRef]

13.

M. S. Kirchner, D. A. Braje, T. M. Fortier, A. M. Weiner, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of 20 GHz, sub-40 fs pulses at 960 nm via repetition-rate multiplication,” Opt. Lett. 34, 872–874 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. Hnsch, and T. Udem, “Fabry-Perot filter cavities for wide-spaced frequency combs with large spectral bandwidth,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 96, 251–256 (2009). [CrossRef]

15.

P. Del’Haye, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Full Stabilization of a Microresonator-Based Optical Frequency Comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 053903 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, I. Solomatine, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, “Tunable Optical Frequency Comb with a Crystalline Whispering Gallery Mode Resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 093902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

D. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. Diddams, “Brillouin-Enhanced Hyperparametric Generation of an Optical Frequency Comb in a Monolithic Highly Nonlinear Fiber Cavity Pumped by a cw Laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 193902 (2009).

18.

S. Xiao, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of a 20 GHz train of subpicosecond pulses with a stabilized optical-frequency-comb generator,” Opt. Lett. 34, 85–87 (2009). [CrossRef]

19.

H. Telle, G. Steinmeyer, A. Dunlop, J. Stenger, D. Sutter, and U. Keller, “Carrier-envelope offset phase control: A novel concept for absolute optical frequency measurement and ultrashort pulse generation,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 69, 327–332 (1999). [CrossRef]

20.

D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff, “Carrier-Envelope Phase Control of Femtosecond Mode-Locked Lasers and Direct Optical Frequency Synthesis,” Science 288, 635–639 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21.

D. C. Heinecke, A. Bartels, T. M. Fortier, D. A. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Optical frequency stabilization of a 10 GHz Ti:sapphire frequency comb by saturated absorption spectroscopy in 87rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 053806 (2009). [CrossRef]

22.

A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “10-GHz Self-Referenced Optical Frequency Comb,” Science 326, 681 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “Passively mode-locked 10 GHz femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser,” Opt. Lett. 33, 1905–1907 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

T. M. Fortier, A. Bartels, and S. A. Diddams, “Octave-spanning Ti:sapphire laser with a repetition rate ¿ 1 GHz for optical frequency measurements and comparisons,” Opt. Lett. 31, 1011–1013 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

Mention of specific trade names is for technical information only and does not constitute an endorsement by NIST.

26.

For typical frequency counters the input frequency is limited to a few hundreds of megahertz. Thus, the frequencies to analyze in the range of gigahertz have to be converted to lower values to enable counter measurements. In the process of difference or sum frequency generation in a mixing device the actual frequency fluctuations of the input frequencies are preserved. Using a stable reference frequency this allows to shift frequencies without affecting the frequency stability. In contrast, in a frequency division process the noise density and therefore the frequency fluctuations are reduced by the division factor. This leads to an increase in frequency stability. For the offset frequency stabilization and analysis we use a frequency division step to reduce phase fluctuations making the phase lock more robust by extending the capture range of the phase detector. In the data evaluation we account for this division factor to recover the original offset frequency stability.

27.

Analog Devices, Ultrahigh Speed Phase/Frequency Discriminator AD9901.

28.

A. Yariv, Optical Electronics (Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, 1991), 4th ed.

29.

C. Harder, J. Katz, S. Margalit, J. Shacham, and A. Yariv, “Noise equivalent circuit of a semiconductor laser diode,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics QE-18, 333–337 (1982). [CrossRef]

30.

R. P. Scott, T. D. Mulder, K. A. Baker, and B. H. Kolner, “Amplitude and phase noise sensitivity of modelocked Ti:sapphire lasers in terms of a complex noise transfer function,” Opt. Express 15, 9090–9095 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

31.

T. M. Fortier, J. Ye, S. T. Cundiff, and R. S. Windeler, “Nonlinear phase noise generated in air-silica microstructure fiber and its effect on carrier-envelope phase,” Opt. Lett. 27, 445–447 (2002). [CrossRef]

32.

B. C. Young, F. C. Cruz, W. M. Itano, and J. C. Bergquist, “Visible Lasers with Subhertz Linewidths,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3799–3802 (1999). [CrossRef]

33.

T. M. Fortier, M. S. Kirchner, F. Quinlan, J. Taylor, J. C. Bergquist, T. Rosenband, N. Lemke, A. Ludlow, Y. Jiang, C. W. Oates, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division,” Nat. Photon. 5, 425–429 (2011). [CrossRef]

34.

P.-L. Liu, K. J. Williams, M. Y. Frankel, and R. D. Esman, “Saturation characteristics of fast photodetectors,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques47, 1297–1303 (1999). [CrossRef]

35.

S. A. Diddams, M. Kirchner, T. Fortier, D. Braje, A. M. Weiner, and L. Hollberg, “Improved signal-to-noise ratio of 10 GHz microwave signals generated with a mode-filtered femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Opt. Express 17, 3331–3340 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36.

J. Taylor, S. Datta, A. Hati, C. Nelson, F. Quinlan, A. Joshi, and S. Diddams, “Characterization of power-to-phase conversion in high-speed p-i-n photodiodes,” IEEE Photonics Journal3, 140–151 (2011). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(120.3940) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Metrology
(140.7090) Lasers and laser optics : Ultrafast lasers
(320.7160) Ultrafast optics : Ultrafast technology

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: July 11, 2011
Revised Manuscript: August 22, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: August 22, 2011
Published: September 6, 2011

Citation
Dirk C. Heinecke, Albrecht Bartels, and Scott A. Diddams, "Offset frequency dynamics and phase noise properties of a self-referenced 10 GHz Ti:sapphire frequency comb," Opt. Express 19, 18440-18451 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-19-18440


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. C.-B. Huang, Z. Jiang, D. Leaird, J. Caraquitena, and A. Weiner, “Spectral line-by-line shaping for optical and microwave arbitrary waveform generations,” Laser & Photonics Reviews2, 227–248 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. A. Bartels, S. A. Diddams, C. W. Oates, G. Wilpers, J. C. Bergquist, W. H. Oskay, and L. Hollberg, “Femtosecond-laser-based synthesis of ultrastable microwave signals from optical frequency references,” Opt. Lett.30, 667–669 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. C.-H. Li, A. J. Benedick, P. Fendel, A. G. Glenday, F. X. Kärtner, D. F. Phillips, D. Sasselov, A. Szentgyorgyi, and R. L. Walsworth, “A laser frequency comb that enables radial velocity measurements with a precision of 1 cm s−1,” Nature452, 610–612 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. S. A. Diddams, L. Hollberg, and V. Mbele, “Molecular fingerprinting with the resolved modes of a femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Nature445, 627–630 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. S. T. Cundiff, “Phase stabilization of ultrashort optical pulses,” J. Opt. D: Applied Physics35, R43 (2002). [CrossRef]
  6. F. Quinlan, S. Gee, S. Ozharar, and P. J. Delfyett, “Ultralow-jitter and -amplitude-noise semiconductor-based actively mode-locked laser,” Opt. Lett.31, 2870–2872 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. E. Yoshida and M. Nakazawa, “Wavelength tunable 1.0 ps pulse generation in 1.530–1.555 μm region from PLL, regeneratively modelocked fibre laser,” Electronics Letters34, 1753–1754 (1998). [CrossRef]
  8. R. Paschotta, L. Krainer, S. Lecomte, G. J. Spühler, S. C. Zeller, A. Aschwanden, D. Lorenser, H. J. Unold, K. J. Weingarten, and U. Keller, “Picosecond pulse sources with multi-GHz repetition rates and high output power,” New Journal of Physics6, 174 (2004). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Zeller, T. Südmeyer, K. Weingarten, and U. Keller, “Passively modelocked 77 GHz Er:Yb:glass laser,” Electronics Letters43, 32–33 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. T. F. Carruthers and I. N. Duling, “10-GHz, 1.3-ps erbium fiber laser employing soliton pulse shortening,” Opt. Lett.21, 1927–1929 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. Martinez and S. Yamashita, “Multi-gigahertz repetition rate passively modelocked fiber lasers using carbon nanotubes,” Opt. Express19, 6155–6163 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. F. Quinlan, G. Ycas, S. Osterman, and S. A. Diddams, “A 12.5 GHz-Spaced Optical Frequency Comb Spanning ¿400 nm for Infrared Astronomical Spectrograph Calibration,” Rev. Sci. Ins.81, 063105 (2010). [CrossRef]
  13. M. S. Kirchner, D. A. Braje, T. M. Fortier, A. M. Weiner, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of 20 GHz, sub-40 fs pulses at 960 nm via repetition-rate multiplication,” Opt. Lett.34, 872–874 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. Hnsch, and T. Udem, “Fabry-Perot filter cavities for wide-spaced frequency combs with large spectral bandwidth,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics96, 251–256 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. P. Del’Haye, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Full Stabilization of a Microresonator-Based Optical Frequency Comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 053903 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, I. Solomatine, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, “Tunable Optical Frequency Comb with a Crystalline Whispering Gallery Mode Resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 093902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. D. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. Diddams, “Brillouin-Enhanced Hyperparametric Generation of an Optical Frequency Comb in a Monolithic Highly Nonlinear Fiber Cavity Pumped by a cw Laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 193902 (2009).
  18. S. Xiao, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of a 20 GHz train of subpicosecond pulses with a stabilized optical-frequency-comb generator,” Opt. Lett.34, 85–87 (2009). [CrossRef]
  19. H. Telle, G. Steinmeyer, A. Dunlop, J. Stenger, D. Sutter, and U. Keller, “Carrier-envelope offset phase control: A novel concept for absolute optical frequency measurement and ultrashort pulse generation,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics69, 327–332 (1999). [CrossRef]
  20. D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff, “Carrier-Envelope Phase Control of Femtosecond Mode-Locked Lasers and Direct Optical Frequency Synthesis,” Science288, 635–639 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. D. C. Heinecke, A. Bartels, T. M. Fortier, D. A. Braje, L. Hollberg, and S. A. Diddams, “Optical frequency stabilization of a 10 GHz Ti:sapphire frequency comb by saturated absorption spectroscopy in 87rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A80, 053806 (2009). [CrossRef]
  22. A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “10-GHz Self-Referenced Optical Frequency Comb,” Science326, 681 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “Passively mode-locked 10 GHz femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser,” Opt. Lett.33, 1905–1907 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. T. M. Fortier, A. Bartels, and S. A. Diddams, “Octave-spanning Ti:sapphire laser with a repetition rate ¿ 1 GHz for optical frequency measurements and comparisons,” Opt. Lett.31, 1011–1013 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mention of specific trade names is for technical information only and does not constitute an endorsement by NIST.
  26. For typical frequency counters the input frequency is limited to a few hundreds of megahertz. Thus, the frequencies to analyze in the range of gigahertz have to be converted to lower values to enable counter measurements. In the process of difference or sum frequency generation in a mixing device the actual frequency fluctuations of the input frequencies are preserved. Using a stable reference frequency this allows to shift frequencies without affecting the frequency stability. In contrast, in a frequency division process the noise density and therefore the frequency fluctuations are reduced by the division factor. This leads to an increase in frequency stability. For the offset frequency stabilization and analysis we use a frequency division step to reduce phase fluctuations making the phase lock more robust by extending the capture range of the phase detector. In the data evaluation we account for this division factor to recover the original offset frequency stability.
  27. Analog Devices, Ultrahigh Speed Phase/Frequency Discriminator AD9901.
  28. A. Yariv, Optical Electronics (Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, 1991), 4th ed.
  29. C. Harder, J. Katz, S. Margalit, J. Shacham, and A. Yariv, “Noise equivalent circuit of a semiconductor laser diode,” IEEE Journal of Quantum ElectronicsQE-18, 333–337 (1982). [CrossRef]
  30. R. P. Scott, T. D. Mulder, K. A. Baker, and B. H. Kolner, “Amplitude and phase noise sensitivity of modelocked Ti:sapphire lasers in terms of a complex noise transfer function,” Opt. Express15, 9090–9095 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. T. M. Fortier, J. Ye, S. T. Cundiff, and R. S. Windeler, “Nonlinear phase noise generated in air-silica microstructure fiber and its effect on carrier-envelope phase,” Opt. Lett.27, 445–447 (2002). [CrossRef]
  32. B. C. Young, F. C. Cruz, W. M. Itano, and J. C. Bergquist, “Visible Lasers with Subhertz Linewidths,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3799–3802 (1999). [CrossRef]
  33. T. M. Fortier, M. S. Kirchner, F. Quinlan, J. Taylor, J. C. Bergquist, T. Rosenband, N. Lemke, A. Ludlow, Y. Jiang, C. W. Oates, and S. A. Diddams, “Generation of ultrastable microwaves via optical frequency division,” Nat. Photon.5, 425–429 (2011). [CrossRef]
  34. P.-L. Liu, K. J. Williams, M. Y. Frankel, and R. D. Esman, “Saturation characteristics of fast photodetectors,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques47, 1297–1303 (1999). [CrossRef]
  35. S. A. Diddams, M. Kirchner, T. Fortier, D. Braje, A. M. Weiner, and L. Hollberg, “Improved signal-to-noise ratio of 10 GHz microwave signals generated with a mode-filtered femtosecond laser frequency comb,” Opt. Express17, 3331–3340 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. J. Taylor, S. Datta, A. Hati, C. Nelson, F. Quinlan, A. Joshi, and S. Diddams, “Characterization of power-to-phase conversion in high-speed p-i-n photodiodes,” IEEE Photonics Journal3, 140–151 (2011). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited