OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 27 — Dec. 19, 2011
  • pp: 26198–26207
« Show journal navigation

Experimental demonstration of improved fiber nonlinearity tolerance for unique-word DFT-spread OFDM systems

Xi Chen, An Li, Guanjun Gao, and William Shieh  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 27, pp. 26198-26207 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.026198


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1238 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In this paper we experimentally demonstrate transmission performance of optical DFT-spread OFDM systems in comparison with conventional OFDM systems. A 440.8-Gb/s superchannel consisting of 8 x 55.1-Gb/s densely-spaced DFT-S OFDM signal is successfully received after 1120-km transmission with a spectral efficiency of 3.5 b/s/Hz. It is shown that DFT-S OFDM can achieve an improvement of 1 dB in Q factor and 1 dB in launch power over conventional OFDM. Additionally, unique word aided phase estimation algorithm is proposed and demonstrated enabling extremely long OFDM symbol transmission.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

Coherent Optical OFDM (CO-OFDM) transmission has shown great promise of supporting single channel transmission data rate beyond 100 Gb/s [1

1. Y. Ma, Q. Yang, Y. Tang, S. Chen, and W. Shieh, “1-Tb/s single-channel coherent optical OFDM transmission over 600-km SSMF fiber with subwavelength bandwidth access,” Opt. Express 17(11), 9421–9427 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5

5. S. L. Jansen, I. Morita, T. C. W. Schenk, and H. Tanaka, “121.9-Gb/s PDM-OFDM transmission with 2-b/s/Hz spectral efficiency over 1000 km of SSMF,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(3), 177–188 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. On one hand, CO-OFDM has drawn great interests in recent years due to its high spectral efficiency and dispersion resilience [1

1. Y. Ma, Q. Yang, Y. Tang, S. Chen, and W. Shieh, “1-Tb/s single-channel coherent optical OFDM transmission over 600-km SSMF fiber with subwavelength bandwidth access,” Opt. Express 17(11), 9421–9427 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5

5. S. L. Jansen, I. Morita, T. C. W. Schenk, and H. Tanaka, “121.9-Gb/s PDM-OFDM transmission with 2-b/s/Hz spectral efficiency over 1000 km of SSMF,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(3), 177–188 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. On the other hand, CO-OFDM has drawbacks of high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and sensitivity to laser phase noise. Particularly, high PAPR causes excessive nonlinear noise during fiber transmission [6

6. M. Nazarathy, J. Khurgin, R. Weidenfeld, Y. Meiman, P. Cho, R. Noe, I. Shpantzer, and V. Karagodsky, “Phased-array cancellation of nonlinear FWM in coherent OFDM dispersive multi-span links,” Opt. Express 16(20), 15777–15810 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Recently, discrete-Fourier-transform spread OFDM (DFT-S OFDM) was proposed as an attractive alternative to conventional CO-OFDM that possesses low PAPR within each OFDM sub-band [7

7. Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]

,8

8. H. G. Myung, J. Lim, and D. J. Goodman, “Peak-to-average power ratio of single carrier FDMA signals with pulse shaping,” In IEEE 17th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 11–14, 2006, 1–5.

].The superior nonlinear performance of DFT-spread (DFT-S) OFDM is predicted by simulation in comparison with conventional OFDM [7

7. Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]

,9

9. W. Shieh, “OFDM for Flexible High-Speed Optical Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(10), 1560–1577 (2011). [CrossRef]

].

In this paper, we show the first experimental verification of nonlinear performance advantage of DFT-S OFDM systems over conventional OFDM systems. Densely-spaced 8 × 55.1-Gb/s DFT-S OFDM channels are successfully received after 1120-km transmission with a spectral efficiency of 3.5 b/s/Hz. We adopt a novel approach of consecutive transmission of both DFT-S-OFDM and conventional OFDM signals, enabling stable and repeatable comparison between these two formats. It is shown that DFT-S OFDM has advantage of about 1dB in Q factor and 1 dB in launch power over conventional OFDM. Additionally, unique word (UW) aided phase estimation algorithm is proposed and demonstrated enabling extremely long OFDM symbol transmission and subsequently improved spectral efficiency.

2. Principle of unique-word (UW) DFT-S OFDM

The concept of unique-word and its application were proposed for single carrier frequency-domain equalization (SC/FDE) [10

10. D. Falconer, S. Ariyavisitakul, A. Benyamin-Seeyar, and B. Eidson, “Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(4), 58–66 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. Aided by the known UWs, better synchronization, channel estimation, and carrier phase estimation can be achieved for UW based systems compared with CP based counterparts [11

11. M. Huemer, H. Witschnig, and J. Hausner, “Unique Word Based Phase Tracking Algorithms for SC/FDE Systems”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM), 2003, 1, 70–74.

,12

12. L. Deneire, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, “Training Sequence vs. Cyclic Prefix: A New Look on Single Carrier Communication,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM), 2000, 1056–1060.

]. The UW is derived from Zadoff-Chu sequence which will be defined later in this section.

Figure 1
Fig. 1 Structure of one DFT-S OFDM symbol. UW: Unique Word; GI: Guard Interval; pt: Point.
illustrates the UW OFDM symbol structure for one of the two polarizations. The UWs are periodically inserted in the data sequence. In this paper, we choose the length of one DFT-S OFDM symbol to be 2048 points, including two 64-point UW patterns at two ends. Each 64-point UW pattern is cyclically extended by 16 points as shown in Fig. 1 (where GI1 and GI2 are 16-point GIs for UW1 and UW2, respectively.), which results in an 80-point UW pattern at each side of OFDM symbol. An optional 8-point GI (GIsym) is appended at the start of the OFDM symbol, which is a copy of the last 8-point of UW2. The purpose of this optional 8-point is to keep data symbol length the same as training symbols. This GI is needed for training symbols so that no extra interpolation required when calculating channel matrix. But it is only optional for data symbols and thus can be dropped for data symbols without affecting any performance. The total length of one DFT-S OFDM symbol is 2056 points.

We adopt block-based decision-feedback (DF) phase estimation given by [13

13. D. Ly-Gagnon, K. Katoh, and K. Kikuchi, “Unrepeated 210-km transmission with coherent detection and digital signal processing of 20-Gb/s QPSK signal,” Tech. Dig. OFC’05, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2005, p. OTuL4.

16

16. W. Shieh, “Maximum-likelihood phase and channel estimation for coherent optical OFDM,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(8), 605–607 (2008). [CrossRef]

]
ϕi=1Kj=1Karg(AijAij0*)   (1iM/K),
(1)
where represents ensemble average, ϕi represents the carrier phase estimated for the i-th segment, Aijand Aij0are respectively received and transmitted j-th point in the i-th block of a OFDM symbol, M is the OFDM symbol length, and K is the block length for phase estimation. Aij0can be replaced with the recovered (or sliced) data after symbol decision on the received symbols when the transmitted symbols are not known. The procedure of UW-based DF phase estimation is as follows: the first block for the phase estimation in each OFDM symbol is calculated within the UW, where the transmitted symbolsAij0are known. The constellation of the second block will be de-rotated using the phase estimated from the first block given by
Aij=Aijejϕi1  (i=2,1jK),
(2)
whereAij and Aij are the j-th point in the i-th block of a OFDM symbol before and after phase compensation, respectively. After constellation de-rotation, the symbol decision will be made to the phase compensated symbols Aij. Then another iteration of phase estimation and compensation will be made by applying Eqs. (1) and (2) (for arbitrary i), which will be subsequently passed to the following block. The propagation will continue until the end of payload blocks. It is noted that the phase estimation can also be performed using UW2 and propagate the phase estimation backward. In this paper, we use K of 16 if not otherwise mentioned.

A similar OFDM symbol structure to that shown in Fig. 1 can be drawn for the second polarization by using different UWs. The reason to use two UWs within one OFDM symbol is compatibility with polarization diversity where the first and second UWs are orthogonal to each other when combining the two OFDM symbols for two polarizations in a Jones vector form. The two UWs for the two polarizations, (UWx1UWy1)and(UWx2UWy2) are given by
(UWx1UWy1)=IDFT(ZCcircshift(ZC)),(UWx2UWy2)=IDFT(circshift(ZC)ZC),
(3)
ZC(n)=ejπ(n1)2Nzc  (1nNzc),
(4)
where ZC is the Zadoff-Chu sequence expressed as a row vector of size Nzc [17

17. D. C. Chu, “Polyphase Codes with Good Periodic Correlation Properties,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 18(4), 531–532 (1972). [CrossRef]

]. circshift()denotes a circular shift of the sequence by half of the sequence length and * denotes complex conjugate. The circular shift ensures that UWs for two polarizations, e.g., UWx1andUWy1are uncorrelated so long as the channel length is shorter than half of the sequence length. Such configuration can aid fast synchronization and channel estimation (not explored in this paper). Fast synchronization and channel estimation for UW based DFT-OFDM will be discussed in a separate submission.

UW aided phase estimation can be very effective in comparison with phase compensation method in conventional OFDM system. Since the phase estimation compensation is implemented in the time domain, it is possible to perform intra-symbol phase noise estimation rather than conventional symbol-wise phase estimation. Additionally, because of known UWs are used to initiate phase estimation, the errors resulting from wrong symbol decisions do not prorogate beyond one OFDM symbol.

Figure 2
Fig. 2 Configuration of baseband DFT-S OFDM transmitter and receiver; S/P (P/S): Serial-to-Parallel (Parallel-to-Serial) conversion; UW: Unique Word; GI: Guard-Interval; D/A (A/D): Digital-to-Analog (Analog-to-Digital) conversion.
shows the signal flow diagram for DFT-S OFDM transmitter and receiver. At the transmitter, after serial to parallel conversion, the UWs are added with data, and converted to frequency domain by applying an M-point DFT. The DFT spread signal is then mapped onto an N-point vector which is subsequently converted to a time-domain signal by IDFT. Typically N is an integral larger than M. In this paper, we choose M of 2048 and N of 4096. The subcarrier mapping is a localized mapping [18

18. 3GPP TR 25.814 V7.0.0, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Aspects for Evolved UTRA”, (2006).

], which means subcarriers are placed continuously and are occupying the center part of the spectrum in this paper. The guard-interval is inserted before digital-to-analog conversion (ADC) to avoid inter-symbol interference. The comparison of RF spectra between DFT-S OFDM and conventional OFDM is shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Baseband spectra for (a) conventional OFDM and (b) DFT-S OFDM.
. The spectra are plotted under the condition that the two signals have exactly the same root mean square (RMS) value. For conventional OFDM signal, it uses 128-point FFT size. The reason we choose FFT size of conventional OFDM different from that of DFT-S OFDM signal is due to the phase noise. The conventional OFDM FFT size is limited by the phase noise and FFT of 128 is chosen. However, for DFT-Spread OFDM, the phase noise can be estimated in the time domain. After the IFFT at receiver, the signal is transformed back to the time domain where a proper averaging window can be chosen for phase estimation. In this way, the FFT size is not limited by phase noise. As a result, the OFDM symbol length can be relatively large. Meanwhile, due to the 160-point UW used, a long OFDM symbol is required to reduce the overhead. Consequently, we choose quite different sizes for DFT-S and conventional OFDM: FFT size of 4096-point for DFT-Spread, and 128 for conventional OFDM. From Fig. 3, both signals have the same bandwidth and identical gap width in the middle to avoid impairment from DC. It can be seen that DFT-S OFDM signal has less power fluctuation and out-of-band leakage because it has much larger FFT size of 4096 than FFT size of 128 in conventional OFDM.

The nonlinear advantage of multi-band DFT-OFDM has been theoretically analyzed [7

7. Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]

,9

9. W. Shieh, “OFDM for Flexible High-Speed Optical Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(10), 1560–1577 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. In multi-band DFT-OFDM systems, each subband is essentially filled with a digitally-generated single-carrier signal. It has been shown that DFT spreading significantly lowers the PAPR for DFT-S OFDM compared with conventional OFDM [8

8. H. G. Myung, J. Lim, and D. J. Goodman, “Peak-to-average power ratio of single carrier FDMA signals with pulse shaping,” In IEEE 17th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 11–14, 2006, 1–5.

]. For instance, DFT-S OFDM signal exceeds a PAPR of 7.5 dB for less than probability of 0.1%, and this PAPR is 3.2 dB lower than the value in conventional OFDM with the same probability [8

8. H. G. Myung, J. Lim, and D. J. Goodman, “Peak-to-average power ratio of single carrier FDMA signals with pulse shaping,” In IEEE 17th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 11–14, 2006, 1–5.

]. Furthermore, one of the important findings of DFT-OFDM for optical transmission is that there exists an optimal bandwidth within which the subbands should be partitioned. The reason for this optimal bandwidth with respect to nonlinearity performance is as follows [7

7. Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]

,9

9. W. Shieh, “OFDM for Flexible High-Speed Optical Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(10), 1560–1577 (2011). [CrossRef]

]: if In the case of small number of subbands, e.g., single carrier, the subband bandwidth becomes too broad. Although the PAPR within each subband is low at launch, due to large walk off among frequency components within each subband, the PAPR of each subband will grow rapidly thus inducing nonlinearity penalty; In the case of large number of subbands, the subband bandwidth becomes too narrow. Neighboring subbands interact just as narrowly-spaced OFDM subcarriers, generating large inter-band nonlinear crosstalk and thereby large penalty due to narrow subband spacing. Subsequently there exists a sweet spot in number of subbands that gives the optimal nonlinearity performance. In this experiment, each DFT-OFDM subband is 5 GHz, which is close to the optimal subband bandwidth predicted in [7

7. Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]

,9

9. W. Shieh, “OFDM for Flexible High-Speed Optical Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(10), 1560–1577 (2011). [CrossRef]

].

Due to one extra DFT at transmitter and one extra IDFT at receiver, the complexity of digital signal processing (DSP) of DFT-S OFDM is higher than that of conventional OFDM. However, due to the improved nonlinearity tolerance, DFT-S OFDM may be a good choice where additional system margin is needed.

3. Experimental results and nonlinear performance analysis

The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Experimental setup of 8x55.1-Gb/s DFT-S OFDM system. AWG: Arbitrary Waveform Generator; PBC: Polarization Beam Combiner; PBS: Polarization Beam Splitter; LO: Local Oscillator; BR: Balanced Receiver; The three insets are (i) measured optical spectrum of 8 wavelength lasers; (ii) Measured optical spectrum of (3x8) 24 tones; (iii) Measured optical spectrum of 24 bands after data modulation.
. At the transmitter, 8 CW lasers are combined and fed into an intensity modulator to impress 3 tones onto each wavelength. The tone spacing is controlled by the drive RF frequency at 5.3125-GHz, and wavelength spacing is set to be 16.4375-GHz. The optical signal is then split with a 3-dB coupler for separate modulation on the two polarizations. The OFDM signal for each individual band is generated by a Tektronix Arbitrary Waveform Generator (AWG). The time-domain OFDM waveform is first generated in a Matlab program with the parameters as follows: total number of subcarriers is 4096 with 4QAM encoding, guard interval is 16/4096 of the observation period, and middle 2145 subcarriers out of 4096 are filled, from which 160 subcarriers are occupied by UW patterns, and 97 subcarriers in the middle are left null to avoid contamination from DC. The real and imaginary parts of the OFDM waveforms are uploaded onto the AWG operated at 10-GS/s to generate two corresponding analog signals. The two polarization signals from 3-dB couplers are separately fed into two optical IQ modulators that are driven by the two AWGs. Consequently, the baseband OFDM signals are impressed onto all the 24 optical tones. The optical spectra of 8-lasers, 24-tones with and without data modulation are shown as insets. The spectrums have flatness over 1.1nm bandwidth.

The optical outputs from the two IQ modulators are combined with a polarization-beam combiner (PBC), forming a dual-polarization 8-channel DFT-S OFDM signal, with each channel carrying 55.1-Gb/s data. The signal is coupled into a recirculation loop for 1120-km transmission. The recirculation loop is consisted of two spans of 80-km SSMF fiber, with two EDFAs at the end of each span to compensate fiber loss. After transmission the signal is received with a polarization diversity coherent receiver. The RF signals from the coherent receiver are then input into a Tektronix real-time sampling scope at 50-GS/s, and processed with a Matlab program using a 2x2 MIMO-OFDM model. To gain stable and repeatable comparison, DFT-S OFDM and conventional OFDM waveforms are cascaded in time domain digitally before loading onto AWG, with the same RMS value. Parameters for conventional OFDM signal are as follows: total number of subcarriers is 128 with 4QAM encoding, guard interval is 1/8 of the observation period, middle 67 subcarriers out of 128 are filled, and DF-based common phase error is calculated for phase estimation. 3 subcarriers close to DC are unfilled to avoid degraded performance due to DC. As such, the unfilled portion of the spectra are kept the same for both DFT-S and conventional OFDM.

Figure 6
Fig. 6 Phase evolution for the received DFT-S OFDM signal. The inset is the zoomed-in phase noise of 12th symbol.
shows an example of phase evolution over 16 DFT-S OFDM symbols (or about 6.5 µs). The phase noise within 12th symbol is shown in inset. It can be seen that due to the long symbol length, the phase can varies more than 0.6 rad within one OFDM symbol. It is obvious that the symbol-wise phase noise compensation is not suitable for extra long symbols. Thus it is necessary to introduce the UW-based time-domain phase compensation.

Figure 7
Fig. 7 Bit Error Rate (BER) versus OSNR for 18.4-, 55.1- and 440.8-Gb/s DFT-S OFDM and conventional OFDM system at the back-to-back.
gives the BER sensitivity of 18.4-Gb/s, 55.1-Gb/s, and 8 × 55.1-Gb/s signal at back-to-back for both DFT-S OFDM and conventional OFDM, which corresponds to one-band, three-band (or one wavelength), and 24-band (or 8 wavelengths) OFDM signal. For 18.4- and 55.1 Gb/s system, the BER is respectively measured over 1,208,320 and 3,624,960 bits. Figure 7 suggests that DFT-S OFDM and conventional OFDM have the same linear performance at back-to-back. The OSNR requirement for a BER of 10−3 is about 6-dB, 11-dB, and 21-dB for 18.4-Gb/s, 55.1-Gb/s, and 440.8-Gb/s system respectively.

Figure 8
Fig. 8 (a) Q factor vs. launch optical power for 440.8-Gb/s signal after 1120-km transmission. Insets are constellations for conventional and DFT-S OFDM signals. (b) Q factor difference between DFT-S OFDM signal and conventional OFDM when using the same phase estimation window size of 64.
shows the nonlinear performance of both DFT-S OFDM signal and conventional OFDM signal for 440.8-Gb/s after 1120-km transmission. Figure 8 (a) shows signal launch power vs. Q factor. It can be seen that DFT-S OFDM has better nonlinear performance, with 1dB optimal Q factor improvement, and about 1 dB improvement in optimal launch power. The effectiveness of DFT-S OFDM system is more evident at high nonlinear region. For instance, at launch power of 7 dBm or 8 dBm, the Q factor of DFT-S OFDM is improved by more than 2 dB. The constellations measured at launch power of 7 dBm are shown as inset in Fig. 8 (a). It is evident that DFT-S OFDM has better performance after 1120-km transmission. To further isolate the nonlinear effect from the phase noise effect, we conduct signal processing by using phase estimation block size k of 64. Since the conventional OFDM is also using phase estimation window of 64 points, the phase noise has the same impact on both DFT-S and conventional OFDM. The Q factor difference between DFT-S and conventional OFDM is shown in Fig. 8 (b) when both have the same phase estimation window size of 64. As can be seen in the figure, when the launch power is higher than 1 dBm, with the increasing power level, the advantage of DFT-S OFDM increases, e.g., 2.8 dB at the launch power of 8 dBm. Because DFT-S and conventional OFDM shall have the same linear phase noise impact due to using the same phase estimation window size, the Q factor difference between these two formats in Fig. 8 (b) is clearly caused by nonlinearity tolerance.

We also measure performance after transmission for the 24 OFDM sub-bands of 8 lasers. The launch power is 4 dBm, which is the optimal power for 440.8-Gb/s DFT-S signal. The Q factors are shown in Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Q factor measurement for all the 24 bands after 1120-km transmission at the optimal launch power of 4 dBm. Inset is the measured received optical spectrum after 1120-km transmission.
. We can see that the advantages of DFT-S OFDM system have been preserved over all the sub-bands, about 1 dB on average. It is noted that due to the middle portion of the spectrum is unfilled (Fig. 2 (b)), the DFT-OFDM signal in this paper is not strictly a single-carrier one. Nevertheless, this demonstration shows not only this quasi-single-carrier format can be received properly for long-haul transmission, it also possess nonlinear advantage over the conventional OFDM. Additionally, because of the long OFDM symbol used, the overhead is reduced to below 10% as opposed to 20-25% in conventional CP based OFDM systems [1

1. Y. Ma, Q. Yang, Y. Tang, S. Chen, and W. Shieh, “1-Tb/s single-channel coherent optical OFDM transmission over 600-km SSMF fiber with subwavelength bandwidth access,” Opt. Express 17(11), 9421–9427 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

4. Conclusion

We have shown the first experimental verification of nonlinear performance advantage of DFT-S OFDM systems over conventional OFDM systems. Densely spaced 8 × 55.1-Gb/s DFT-S OFDM channels are successfully received after 1120-km transmission with a spectral efficiency of 3.5 b/s/Hz. We adopt a novel approach of consecutive transmission of DFT-S-OFDM and conventional OFDM enabling stable and repeatable measurements. It is shown that DFT-S OFDM has advantage of about 1 dB in Q factor and 1 dB in launch power over conventional OFDM. Additionally, unique word (UW) aided phase estimation algorithm is proposed and demonstrated enabling extremely long OFDM symbol transmission.

Acknowledgment 

This work was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC) and National ICT of Australia (NICTA). NICTA is funded by the Australian Government as represented by the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy and the Australian Research Council through the ICT centre of Excellence program.

References and links

1.

Y. Ma, Q. Yang, Y. Tang, S. Chen, and W. Shieh, “1-Tb/s single-channel coherent optical OFDM transmission over 600-km SSMF fiber with subwavelength bandwidth access,” Opt. Express 17(11), 9421–9427 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

S. Chandrasekhar and X. Liu, “Experimental investigation on the performance of closely spaced multi-carrier PDM-QPSK with digital coherent detection,” Opt. Express 17(24), 21350–21361 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

R. Dischler and F. Buchali, “Transmission of 1.2 Tb/s Continuous Waveband PDM‐OFDM‐FDM Signal with Spectral Efficiency of 3.3 bit/s/Hz over 400 km of SSMF,” Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Diego, USA, 2009, p. PDPC2.

4.

X. Liu, S. Chandrasekhar, B. Zhu, P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, and D. W. Peckham, “448-Gb/s reduced-guardinterval CO-OFDM transmission over 2000 km of ultra-large-area fiber and five 80-GHz-grid ROADMs,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(4), 483–490 (2011). [CrossRef]

5.

S. L. Jansen, I. Morita, T. C. W. Schenk, and H. Tanaka, “121.9-Gb/s PDM-OFDM transmission with 2-b/s/Hz spectral efficiency over 1000 km of SSMF,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(3), 177–188 (2009). [CrossRef]

6.

M. Nazarathy, J. Khurgin, R. Weidenfeld, Y. Meiman, P. Cho, R. Noe, I. Shpantzer, and V. Karagodsky, “Phased-array cancellation of nonlinear FWM in coherent OFDM dispersive multi-span links,” Opt. Express 16(20), 15777–15810 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]

8.

H. G. Myung, J. Lim, and D. J. Goodman, “Peak-to-average power ratio of single carrier FDMA signals with pulse shaping,” In IEEE 17th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 11–14, 2006, 1–5.

9.

W. Shieh, “OFDM for Flexible High-Speed Optical Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(10), 1560–1577 (2011). [CrossRef]

10.

D. Falconer, S. Ariyavisitakul, A. Benyamin-Seeyar, and B. Eidson, “Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(4), 58–66 (2002). [CrossRef]

11.

M. Huemer, H. Witschnig, and J. Hausner, “Unique Word Based Phase Tracking Algorithms for SC/FDE Systems”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM), 2003, 1, 70–74.

12.

L. Deneire, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, “Training Sequence vs. Cyclic Prefix: A New Look on Single Carrier Communication,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM), 2000, 1056–1060.

13.

D. Ly-Gagnon, K. Katoh, and K. Kikuchi, “Unrepeated 210-km transmission with coherent detection and digital signal processing of 20-Gb/s QPSK signal,” Tech. Dig. OFC’05, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2005, p. OTuL4.

14.

M. E. Mousa-Pasandi and D. V. Plant, “Zero-overhead phase noise compensation via decision-directed phase equalizer for coherent optical OFDM,” Opt. Express 18(20), 20651–20660 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

S. Zhang, P. Y. Kam, C. Yu, and J. Chen, “Laser linewidth tolerance of decision-aided maximum likelihood phase estimation in coherent optical M-ary PSK and QAM systems,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(15), 1075–1077 (2009). [CrossRef]

16.

W. Shieh, “Maximum-likelihood phase and channel estimation for coherent optical OFDM,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(8), 605–607 (2008). [CrossRef]

17.

D. C. Chu, “Polyphase Codes with Good Periodic Correlation Properties,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 18(4), 531–532 (1972). [CrossRef]

18.

3GPP TR 25.814 V7.0.0, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Aspects for Evolved UTRA”, (2006).

OCIS Codes
(060.1660) Fiber optics and optical communications : Coherent communications
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: August 25, 2011
Revised Manuscript: October 16, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: October 29, 2011
Published: December 8, 2011

Citation
Xi Chen, An Li, Guanjun Gao, and William Shieh, "Experimental demonstration of improved fiber nonlinearity tolerance for unique-word DFT-spread OFDM systems," Opt. Express 19, 26198-26207 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-27-26198


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Y. Ma, Q. Yang, Y. Tang, S. Chen, and W. Shieh, “1-Tb/s single-channel coherent optical OFDM transmission over 600-km SSMF fiber with subwavelength bandwidth access,” Opt. Express17(11), 9421–9427 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. S. Chandrasekhar and X. Liu, “Experimental investigation on the performance of closely spaced multi-carrier PDM-QPSK with digital coherent detection,” Opt. Express17(24), 21350–21361 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. R. Dischler and F. Buchali, “Transmission of 1.2 Tb/s Continuous Waveband PDM‐OFDM‐FDM Signal with Spectral Efficiency of 3.3 bit/s/Hz over 400 km of SSMF,” Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), San Diego, USA, 2009, p. PDPC2.
  4. X. Liu, S. Chandrasekhar, B. Zhu, P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, and D. W. Peckham, “448-Gb/s reduced-guardinterval CO-OFDM transmission over 2000 km of ultra-large-area fiber and five 80-GHz-grid ROADMs,” J. Lightwave Technol.29(4), 483–490 (2011). [CrossRef]
  5. S. L. Jansen, I. Morita, T. C. W. Schenk, and H. Tanaka, “121.9-Gb/s PDM-OFDM transmission with 2-b/s/Hz spectral efficiency over 1000 km of SSMF,” J. Lightwave Technol.27(3), 177–188 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Nazarathy, J. Khurgin, R. Weidenfeld, Y. Meiman, P. Cho, R. Noe, I. Shpantzer, and V. Karagodsky, “Phased-array cancellation of nonlinear FWM in coherent OFDM dispersive multi-span links,” Opt. Express16(20), 15777–15810 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Y. Tang, W. Shieh, and B. S. Krongold, “DFT-spread OFDM for fiber nonlinearity mitigation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.22(16), 1250–1252 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. H. G. Myung, J. Lim, and D. J. Goodman, “Peak-to-average power ratio of single carrier FDMA signals with pulse shaping,” In IEEE 17th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 11–14, 2006, 1–5.
  9. W. Shieh, “OFDM for Flexible High-Speed Optical Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol.29(10), 1560–1577 (2011). [CrossRef]
  10. D. Falconer, S. Ariyavisitakul, A. Benyamin-Seeyar, and B. Eidson, “Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag.40(4), 58–66 (2002). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Huemer, H. Witschnig, and J. Hausner, “Unique Word Based Phase Tracking Algorithms for SC/FDE Systems”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM), 2003, 1, 70–74.
  12. L. Deneire, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, “Training Sequence vs. Cyclic Prefix: A New Look on Single Carrier Communication,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM), 2000, 1056–1060.
  13. D. Ly-Gagnon, K. Katoh, and K. Kikuchi, “Unrepeated 210-km transmission with coherent detection and digital signal processing of 20-Gb/s QPSK signal,” Tech. Dig. OFC’05, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2005, p. OTuL4.
  14. M. E. Mousa-Pasandi and D. V. Plant, “Zero-overhead phase noise compensation via decision-directed phase equalizer for coherent optical OFDM,” Opt. Express18(20), 20651–20660 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. S. Zhang, P. Y. Kam, C. Yu, and J. Chen, “Laser linewidth tolerance of decision-aided maximum likelihood phase estimation in coherent optical M-ary PSK and QAM systems,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.21(15), 1075–1077 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. W. Shieh, “Maximum-likelihood phase and channel estimation for coherent optical OFDM,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20(8), 605–607 (2008). [CrossRef]
  17. D. C. Chu, “Polyphase Codes with Good Periodic Correlation Properties,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory18(4), 531–532 (1972). [CrossRef]
  18. 3GPP TR 25.814 V7.0.0, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Aspects for Evolved UTRA”, (2006).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited