Efficient near-infrared quantum cutting in NaYF4: Ho3+, Yb3+ for solar photovoltaics

doi:10.1364/OE.19.001749

« Show journal navigation

Efficient near-infrared quantum cutting in NaYF₄: Ho³⁺, Yb³⁺ for solar photovoltaics

Kaimo Deng, Tao Gong, Lingxun Hu, Xiantao Wei, Yonghu Chen, and Min Yin »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 3, pp. 1749-1754 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.001749

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1578 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experiments
3. Results and discussion
4. Conclusions
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (18)
Cited By
Figures (6)
Metrics

Abstract

Quantum cutting converting a ultraviolet photon into two near-infrared photons has been demonstrated by spectroscopic measurements in NaYF₄:Ho³⁺,Yb³⁺ synthesized by hydrothermal method. Evidence is provided to confirm the occurrence of quantum cutting. Upon excitation of Ho^{3+ 5}G₄ level, near-infrared quantum cutting could occur through a two-step resonance energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺ by cross relaxation, with a maximum quantum efficiency of 155.2%. This result reveals the possibility of violet to near-infrared quantum cutting with a quantum efficiency larger than 100% in Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped fluorides, suggesting the possible application in modifying the solar spectrum to enhance the efficiency of silicon solar cells.

1. Introduction

The mismatch between the solar spectrum and the band gap energy of silicon semiconductor limits the energy efficiency of crystalline silicon based solar cells, which occupy a majority of the market share in the field of solar cells. Photons with energy lower than the band gap cannot be absorbed, while for photons with energy larger than the band gap, the excess energy is lost by thermalization of hot charge carriers [1

T. Trupke, M. A. Green, and P. Würfel, “Improving solar cell efficiencies by down-conversion of high-energy photons,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(3), 1668 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. To achieve a higher energy efficiency, tandem solar cells consisted of multiple semiconductor layers have been developed and each semiconductor layer has a characteristic band gap converting a different part of the solar spectrum [2

T. Ameri, G. Dennler, C. Lungenschmied, and C. J. Brabec, “Organic tandem solar cells: A review,” Energy Environ. Sci. 2(4), 347–363 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. However, the complicated fabrication and high cost limit their practical use. Another feasible method allowing the solar cells to capture more energy from the solar spectrum is by spectral modification through near-infrared quantum cutting [3

B. S. Richards, “Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: Down-conversion,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(9), 1189–1207 (2006). [CrossRef]

C. Strumpel, M. McCann, G. Beaucarne, V. Arkhipov, A. Slaoui, V. Svrcek, C. del Canizo, and I. Tobias, “Modifying the solar spectrum to enhance silicon solar cell efficiency - An overview of available materials,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91(4), 238–249 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Cutting a ultraviolet or blue photon into two near-infrared photons, which can be well absorbed by solar cells, can reduce the energy loss related to thermalization of hot charge carriers and then boost the efficiency of solar cells. Because of this potential application in solar cells near-infrared quantum cutting has attracted a lot of recent research attention [5

P. Vergeer, T. J. H. Vlugt, M. H. F. Kox, M. I. den Hertog, J. P. J. M. van der Eerden, and A. Meijerink, “Quantum cutting by cooperative energy transfer in Yb_xY_1-xPO₄:Tb³⁺ ,” Phys. Rev. B 71(1), 014119 (2005). [CrossRef]

–14

J. J. Eilers, D. Biner, J. T. van Wijngaarden, K. Krämer, H.-U. Güdel, and A. Meijerink, “Efficient visible to infrared quantum cutting through downconversion with the Er³⁺–Yb³⁺ couple in Cs₃Y₂Br₉ ,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(15), 151106 (2010). [CrossRef]

Effective spectral modification can be obtained by combination of different rare earth ions thanks to the unique and rich energy levels of lanthanide rare earth ions covering a wide spectral range from ultraviolet to infrared. Near-infrared quantum cutting was first achieved in YPO₄:Tb³⁺,Yb³⁺ [5

] where a visible photon was converted into two near infrared photons through cooperative energy transfer from Tb³⁺ to Yb³⁺. Yb³⁺ ion possesses only two manifolds: the ²F_7/2 ground state and the ²F_5/2 excited state, which are separated by about 10000cm⁻¹ in the energy level scheme. Photons emitted by Yb³⁺ ions is around 1000nm, just above the band gap of crystalline silicon, where the silicon solar cells show an excellent spectral response. Similar phenomena have also been observed in RE³⁺/Yb³⁺ (RE = Bi, Tm, and Ce) codoped phosphors and glasses [10

X. Wei, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, M. Yin, and Y. Li, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Bi³⁺ to Yb³⁺ in Y₂O₃ phosphor,” Chin. Phys. B 19(7), 077804 (2010). [CrossRef]

–12

D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Ce³⁺ to Yb³⁺ in borate glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(11), 116105 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. Nevertheless, due to the second order nature of the transfer process, such a cooperative energy transfer is not as efficient as resonance energy transfer, and a high transfer efficiency will only be possible at relatively heavy Yb³⁺ doping where Yb³⁺ emission is largely depressed by concentration quenching [13

B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Near-Infrared Quantum Cutting for Photovoltaics,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(30), 3073–3077 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Therefore resonance energy transfer between rare earth ions is more favorable in order to get a higher quantum efficiency. However, until now, there have been few reports of near-infrared quantum cutting through resonance energy transfer [13

B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Near-Infrared Quantum Cutting for Photovoltaics,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(30), 3073–3077 (2009). [CrossRef]

,14

Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped NaYF₄, a host with phonon energy about 400cm⁻¹ [15

J. F. Suyver, J. Grimm, M. K. van Veen, D. Biner, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Upconversion spectroscopy and properties of NaYF₄ doped with Er³⁺, Tm³⁺ and/or Yb³⁺ ,” J. Lumin. 117(1), 1–12 (2006). [CrossRef]

], is well-known as a high-efficiency upconversion phosphor due to efficient energy transfer from Yb³⁺ to Ho³⁺. Figure 1 presents a schematic diagram of the energy levels of Ho³⁺ and Yb³⁺ that are of interest. Close inspection shows that the energy gap of ⁵G₄ and ⁵F₅, ⁵F₅ and ⁵I₇ are resonant with the energy for the transition from ²F_5/2 to ²F_7/2 on Yb³⁺. As a result, resonance energy transfer by cross relaxation can be expected to realize quantum cutting. In this paper we investigate the spectroscopic properties of Ho³⁺ single doped and Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped NaYF₄, and demonstrate the existence of near infrared quantum cutting as well as the quantum cutting mechanism for the first time.

Fig. 1 Energy levels diagram of Ho³⁺ and Yb³⁺ showing possible mechanisms for a near-infrared quantum cutting. One ultraviolet photon absorbed by Ho³⁺ is converted into two Yb³⁺ near infrared photons through two-step sequential cross relaxations. Solid, dotted, curly arrows represent optical transition, cross relaxation, and multiphonon relaxation, respectively.

2. Experiments

The powder samples of NaYF₄ doped with Ho³⁺(0.5mol%) and Yb³⁺(0,5,10,20mol%) were synthesized by hydrothermal method. All the chemicals are of analytical grade reagents and used without further purification. The RE(NO₃)₃ standard solutions(Y/Ho/Yb, 2 mmol in total) with desired stoichiometric ratio were added into 35ml aqueous solution containing 16 mmol NaF by dropwise under magnetic stirring. Then the resulting suspension was transferred into a 50 ml Teflon bottle held in a stainless steel autoclave, sealed, and maintained at 180°C for 24h. After cooling to room temperature, the precipitates were separated by filtration, washed with ethanol for several times and then dried in air. The crystalline phases of the synthesized samples were characterized by XRD(MAC Science Co. Ltd. MXP18AHF), using nickel-filtered Cu Kα radiation in the

2 θ

range from 10° to 70°. Luminescent spectra were measured with a Jobin Yvon Fluorolog-3 system equipped with a 450W Xe-lamp as excitation source and a 50W flash lamp for time resolved measurements, where the visible and infrared emission were detected with a Hamamatsu R928 photomultiplier tube and a liquid nitrogen-cooled DSS-IGA020L InGaAs detector, respectively. To compare the emission intensities of samples with different Yb³⁺ doping, the emission spectra were recorded at identical experimental conditions. All the measurements were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

The XRD patterns for NaYF₄ samples with 0.5mol% Ho³⁺ and different Yb³⁺ doping concentrations are shown in Fig. 2 . The little change of the lanthanide ions in their atomic radii facilitates the substitution for Ho³⁺ and Yb³⁺ within the NaYF₄ matrix. Compared with standard data(JCPDS No.16-0334), all the samples exhibit the peaks of pure hexagonal phase. No second phase is detected in the XRD pattern, revealing the successful doping of Ho³⁺ and Yb³⁺ ions in NaYF₄. Additionally, the fairly narrow full width at half maximum and intense diffraction peaks indicate the well crystallization of the sample. However, due to the preferential growth effect in the hydrothermal process [16

C. Li, Z. Quan, J. Yang, P. Yang, and J. Lin, “Highly Uniform and Monodisperse α-NaYF₄:Ln³⁺ (Ln = Eu, Tb, Yb/Er, and Yb/Tm) Hexagonal Microprism Crystals: Hydrothermal Synthesis and Luminescent Properties,” Inorg. Chem. 46(16), 6329–6337 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the relative intensities of the peaks are a little different from those in standard data.

Fig. 2 XRD patterns of the NaYF₄:Ho³⁺,Yb³⁺ samples with different Yb³⁺ doping concentration compared with NaYF₄ standard data JCPDS No.16-0334.

In Fig. 3 the emission spectra for NaYF₄ doped with Ho³⁺(0.5mol%) and Yb³⁺ (0,5,10,20mol%) are shown for Ho^{3+ 5}G₅’ excitation at 359nm. For the Ho³⁺ single-doped sample, excitation into the Ho^{3+ 5}G₅’ level yields the Ho³⁺ characteristic emission from the ⁵G₄, ⁵G₅, ⁵F₃, ⁵S₂, ⁵F₅ level. The intensities of the ⁵G₄, ⁵G₅ and ⁵F₃ emission are rather weak compared to the strong emission originating from the ⁵S₂→⁵I₈ transition(about two orders of magnitude weaker in integrated intensity). The energy gap between the ⁵G₄, ⁵G₅ and ⁵F₃ level to the next lower level is about 2000cm⁻¹, 1500cm⁻¹ and 2000cm⁻¹, respectively. The energy gap law [17

G. Blasse, and B. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials , (Springer-Verlag, 1994).

] predicts that radiative decay and multiphonon relaxation can compete only when the gap is five times the phonon energy. Based on the present observations and the energy gap law, we can assert that multiphonon relaxation dominates over radiative decay for the ⁵G₄, ⁵G₅ and ⁵F₃ level. Apart from visible emission from Ho³⁺, infrared emission band around 1200nm, corresponding to the ⁵I₆→⁵I₈ transition, as well as intense Yb^{3+ 2}F_5/2 emission around 1000nm are also observed. The appearance of Yb³⁺ infrared emission in Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped sample results from energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺. Furthermore, visible emissions from Ho³⁺ are significantly weakened in their intensities with the increase of Yb³⁺ concentration, while the most intense Yb³⁺ emission at 1000nm is obtained for 5mol% Yb³⁺ doping as a result of concentration quenching. In addition, Ho³⁺ emissions in the visible range can hardly been observed in the sample with 20mol% Yb³⁺ doping, suggesting an efficient energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺.

Fig. 3 Visible to near infrared emission spectra of NaYF₄: Ho³⁺,Yb³⁺ with various Yb³⁺ doping upon 359nm excitation.

Further information of energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺ can be obtained from the excitation spectra for Ho³⁺ emission at 540nm corresponding to the ⁵S₂→⁵I₈ transition, as shown in Fig. 4 . The excitation spectra for all the samples with various Yb³⁺ concentrations are normalized to the ⁵G₆/⁵F₁ level. A series of bands appear in the excitation spectra as excitation into these energy levels is followed by multiphonon relaxation to the ⁵S₂ level. An obvious decrease in the excitation intensities for the bands corresponding to the transition to the ⁵G₄ level as well as the upper levels (from 325nm to 400nm, denoted as Part A) compared with the bands below the ⁵G₄ level (from 400nm to 500nm, denoted as Part B) is observed as Yb³⁺ concentration increases, whereas the excitation bands inside Part A and Part B undergo almost no change in their relative intensities. This decrease is ascribed to the cross relaxation from Ho³⁺(⁵G₄→⁵F₅) to Yb³⁺(²F_7/2→²F_5/2), since it depopulates the population of the ⁵S₂ level only when excitation is not lower than the ⁵G₄ level. If no such cross relaxation occurs, however, the relative intensities of the excitation spectra should remain unchanged. Assuming that excitation into levels between ⁵G₂ and ⁵F₃ is followed by multiphonon relaxation to the ⁵S₂ level except for the cross relaxation from Ho^{3+ 5}G₄ to Yb³⁺, the efficiency of the cross relaxation can be expressed as

η_{C R} = 1 - \frac{{(A / B)}_{x % Y b}}{{(A / B)}_{0 % Y b}},

(1)

where A/B is the ratio of the integrated excitation intensity between Part A and B, the subscript 0% and x% refer to the Ho³⁺ single doped sample and the Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped sample, respectively. This assumption is reasonable because on the one hand the energy levels above ⁵S₂ are closely separated and multiphonon relaxation dominates over radiative decay as indicated in the above discussion; and on the other hand among the energy levels from ⁵G₂ to ⁵F₃ only the ⁵G₄ level satisfies the condition for resonant interaction with Yb³⁺. According to Eq. (1), a cross relaxation efficiency of 25.5%, 45.3% and 61.2% can be obtained for the samples with 5, 10 and 20mol% Yb³⁺ doping, respectively. It is worthwhile to note that this cross relaxation competes mainly with multiphonon relaxation to the next lower energy level of ⁵G₄ and a host lattice with a lower phonon energy will facilitate the cross relaxation rate.

Fig. 4 Excitation spectra of Ho³⁺ emission at 540nm in NaYF₄:Ho³⁺,Yb³⁺ with various Yb³⁺ doping. All the spectra are normalized to the ⁵G₆/⁵F₁ level.

The cross relaxation depopulates the ⁵G₄ level but simultaneously populates the ⁵F₅ level. Thus an increase of the ⁵F₅ emission intensity is expected in NaYF₄:Ho³⁺,Yb³⁺ compared with that in NaYF₄:Ho³⁺. On the contrary, the ⁵F₅ emission intensity drops with increasing Yb³⁺ concentration according to Fig. 3. Figure 5 presents the decay curves of Ho^{3+ 5}S₂ emission at 540nm as well as ⁵F₅ emission at 650nm. It is noted that both the Ho³⁺ emissions in all the samples show a nearly exponential decay and the lifetime, fitted by a single exponential, decreases rapidly with the increase of Yb³⁺ concentration as can be seen in the insets of Fig. 4. Since the Ho³⁺ concentration was maintained constant in all the samples, the decline of the lifetime should not be attributed to the concentration quenching of Ho³⁺ but to extra decay pathway introduced by Yb³⁺ doping: resonance energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺ by cross relaxation from Ho³⁺(⁵S₂→⁵I₆) to Yb³⁺(²F_7/2→²F_5/2) and Ho³⁺(⁵F₅→⁵I₇) to Yb³⁺(²F_7/2→²F_5/2), which accelerates the depopulation of ⁵F₄(⁵S₂) and ⁵F₅ level, respectively, and leads to a shorter lifetime and weaker intensity for both emission. The presence of the former cross relaxation can also be confirmed by the pronounced increase of ⁵I₆ emission in Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped sample. The ⁵I₆ emission around 1200nm, however, is beyond the spectral response of Si solar cells. From the decay curves the energy transfer efficiency can be determined using the following equation [5

η_{T R} = 1 - \frac{\int I_{x % Y b} d t}{\int I_{0 % Y b} d t},

(2)

where I denotes intensity and x%Yb stands for the Yb³⁺ concentration. The efficiency for the energy transfer from ⁵S₂, ⁵F₅ level to Yb³⁺ is 92.6% and 94.9%, respectively, in the sample with 20mol% Yb³⁺ doping. This result means that energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺ is extremely efficient.

Fig. 5 Decay curves of (a) Ho^{3+ 5}S₂ emission at 540nm and (b) ⁵F₅ emission at 650nm under 359nm excitation in NaYF₄:Ho³⁺,Yb³⁺ with different Yb³⁺ concentration. Insets show the lifetime(τ) of ⁵S₂ and ⁵F₅ level, respectively.

In the above discussions near-infrared quantum cutting involved two-step sequential cross relaxation: Ho³⁺(⁵G₄→⁵F₅) to Yb³⁺(²F_7/2→²F_5/2) followed by Ho³⁺(⁵F₅→⁵I₇) to Yb³⁺ (²F_7/2→²F_5/2), has been clearly demonstrated as exhibited in Fig. 1. A measurement of excitation spectra of Yb³⁺ emission in the Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped sample can provide a direct test of the performance of quantum cutting in comparison with excitation spectra of Ho³⁺ 1190nm emission in Ho³⁺ single doped sample as shown in Fig. 6 . The infrared excitation spectra were run with a wider monochromator slit width and thus it has a lower spectral resolution compared with the visible excitation spectra. The excitation spectra are normalized to the ⁵G₆/⁵F₁ level as well. If quantum cutting occurs in the ⁵G₄ level, the relative intensity of the excitation bands related to the transition to this level as well as the levels above should increase in the excitation spectra of Yb³⁺ emission; meanwhile, the excitation bands below the ⁵G₄ level should remain the same, since in the quantum cutting process two near-infrared photons are generated, rather than one in a trivial one-step energy transfer from the ⁵S₂ level [18

J. M. Meijer, L. Aarts, B. M. van der Ende, T. J. H. Vlugt, and A. Meijerink, “Downconversion for solar cells in YF₃:Nd³⁺, Yb³⁺ ,” Phys. Rev. B 81(3), 035107 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. In Fig. 6 an expected increase of excitation intensity at ⁵G₄ level together with the levels above is clearly observed, verifying the occurrence of near infrared quantum cutting. Supposing there is no nonradiatvie energy loss by defects and impurities, the quantum efficiency can be estimated, to a good approximation, according to the formula below:

η_{Q E} = η_{C R} + η_{C R} η_{T R} ({}^{5}F_{5}) + (1 - η_{C R}) η_{T R} ({}^{5}S_{2}),

(3)

in which the last two terms arise from the contribution of energy transfer from ⁵F₅ and ⁵S₂ level to Yb³⁺, respectively, and the quantum efficiency of Yb³⁺ ions is set to be unity. Thus a maximum quantum efficiency of 155.2% is achieved in the sample with 20mol% Yb³⁺ doping, showing that the Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ couple in fluorides is an efficient combination for near-infrared quantum cutting. A more elaborate calculation of the quantum cutting efficiency needs further investigation. For application in solar cells, a suitable sensitizer, which exhibits an intense absorption in ultraviolet spectral range and transfers the energy to Ho^{3+ 5}G₄ level, should be incorporated into the phosphor as the Ho³⁺ absorption is weak in intensity due to the dipole forbidden nature of the intra-4f transitions.

Fig. 6 Excitation spectra of Yb³⁺ 1013nm emission in NaYF₄:0.5% Ho³⁺,20% Yb³⁺ and Ho³⁺ 1190nm emission in NaYF₄:0.5% Ho³⁺. Both the spectra are normalized to the ⁵G₆/⁵F₁ level.

4. Conclusions

In summary, an efficient near-infrared quantum cutting through two sequential resonant energy transfer from Ho³⁺ to Yb³⁺ has been demonstrated in Ho³⁺/Yb³⁺ codoped NaYF₄. A maximum quantum efficiency of 155.2% can be determined from excitation spectra and decay curves. The high quantum efficiency and the intense Yb³⁺ near-infrared emission indicate the potential application in realizing a high energy efficiency of crystalline silicon based solar cells.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (10774140, 11011120083, 11074245, and 10904139), Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KJCX2-YW-M11), and Special Foundation for Talents of Anhui Province, China (2007Z021).

References and links

1.	T. Trupke, M. A. Green, and P. Würfel, “Improving solar cell efficiencies by down-conversion of high-energy photons,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(3), 1668 (2002). [CrossRef]
2.	T. Ameri, G. Dennler, C. Lungenschmied, and C. J. Brabec, “Organic tandem solar cells: A review,” Energy Environ. Sci. 2(4), 347–363 (2009). [CrossRef]
3.	B. S. Richards, “Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: Down-conversion,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(9), 1189–1207 (2006). [CrossRef]
4.	C. Strumpel, M. McCann, G. Beaucarne, V. Arkhipov, A. Slaoui, V. Svrcek, C. del Canizo, and I. Tobias, “Modifying the solar spectrum to enhance silicon solar cell efficiency - An overview of available materials,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91(4), 238–249 (2007). [CrossRef]
5.	P. Vergeer, T. J. H. Vlugt, M. H. F. Kox, M. I. den Hertog, J. P. J. M. van der Eerden, and A. Meijerink, “Quantum cutting by cooperative energy transfer in Yb_xY_1-xPO₄:Tb³⁺ ,” Phys. Rev. B 71(1), 014119 (2005). [CrossRef]
6.	X. Wei, S. Huang, Y. Chen, C. Guo, M. Yin, and W. Xu, “Energy transfer mechanism in Yb³⁺ doped YVO₄ near-infrared downconversion phosphor,” J. Appl. Phys. 107(10), 103107 (2010). [CrossRef]
7.	Y. Teng, J. Zhou, X. Liu, S. Ye, and J. Qiu, “Efficient broadband near-infrared quantum cutting for solar cells,” Opt. Express 18(9), 9671–9676 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.	D. Chen, Y. Yu, H. Lin, P. Huang, Z. Shan, and Y. Wang, “Ultraviolet-blue to near-infrared downconversion of Nd(³⁺)-Yb(³⁺) couple,” Opt. Lett. 35(2), 220–222 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Near-infrared quantum cutting in transparent nanostructured glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 33(16), 1884–1886 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.	X. Wei, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, M. Yin, and Y. Li, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Bi³⁺ to Yb³⁺ in Y₂O₃ phosphor,” Chin. Phys. B 19(7), 077804 (2010). [CrossRef]
11.	S. Ye, B. Zhu, J. Luo, J. Chen, G. Lakshminarayana, and J. Qiu, “Enhanced cooperative quantum cutting in Tm³⁺- Yb³⁺ codoped glass ceramics containing LaF₃ nanocrystals,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8989–8994 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.	D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Ce³⁺ to Yb³⁺ in borate glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(11), 116105 (2008). [CrossRef]
13.	B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Near-Infrared Quantum Cutting for Photovoltaics,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(30), 3073–3077 (2009). [CrossRef]
14.	J. J. Eilers, D. Biner, J. T. van Wijngaarden, K. Krämer, H.-U. Güdel, and A. Meijerink, “Efficient visible to infrared quantum cutting through downconversion with the Er³⁺–Yb³⁺ couple in Cs₃Y₂Br₉ ,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(15), 151106 (2010). [CrossRef]
15.	J. F. Suyver, J. Grimm, M. K. van Veen, D. Biner, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Upconversion spectroscopy and properties of NaYF₄ doped with Er³⁺, Tm³⁺ and/or Yb³⁺ ,” J. Lumin. 117(1), 1–12 (2006). [CrossRef]
16.	C. Li, Z. Quan, J. Yang, P. Yang, and J. Lin, “Highly Uniform and Monodisperse α-NaYF₄:Ln³⁺ (Ln = Eu, Tb, Yb/Er, and Yb/Tm) Hexagonal Microprism Crystals: Hydrothermal Synthesis and Luminescent Properties,” Inorg. Chem. 46(16), 6329–6337 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.	G. Blasse, and B. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials , (Springer-Verlag, 1994).
18.	J. M. Meijer, L. Aarts, B. M. van der Ende, T. J. H. Vlugt, and A. Meijerink, “Downconversion for solar cells in YF₃:Nd³⁺, Yb³⁺ ,” Phys. Rev. B 81(3), 035107 (2010). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.2540) Materials : Fluorescent and luminescent materials
(160.5690) Materials : Rare-earth-doped materials
(300.6340) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy, infrared

ToC Category:
Materials

History
Original Manuscript: November 16, 2010
Revised Manuscript: January 13, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: January 13, 2011
Published: January 14, 2011

Citation
Kaimo Deng, Tao Gong, Lingxun Hu, Xiantao Wei, Yonghu Chen, and Min Yin, "Efficient near-infrared quantum cutting in NaYF₄: Ho³⁺, Yb³⁺ for solar photovoltaics," Opt. Express 19, 1749-1754 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-3-1749

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

T. Trupke, M. A. Green, and P. Würfel, “Improving solar cell efficiencies by down-conversion of high-energy photons,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(3), 1668 (2002). [CrossRef]
T. Ameri, G. Dennler, C. Lungenschmied, and C. J. Brabec, “Organic tandem solar cells: A review,” Energy Environ. Sci. 2(4), 347–363 (2009). [CrossRef]
B. S. Richards, “Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: Down-conversion,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(9), 1189–1207 (2006). [CrossRef]
C. Strumpel, M. McCann, G. Beaucarne, V. Arkhipov, A. Slaoui, V. Svrcek, C. del Canizo, and I. Tobias, “Modifying the solar spectrum to enhance silicon solar cell efficiency - An overview of available materials,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91(4), 238–249 (2007). [CrossRef]
P. Vergeer, T. J. H. Vlugt, M. H. F. Kox, M. I. den Hertog, J. P. J. M. van der Eerden, and A. Meijerink, “Quantum cutting by cooperative energy transfer in YbxY1-xPO4:Tb3+,” Phys. Rev. B 71(1), 014119 (2005). [CrossRef]
X. Wei, S. Huang, Y. Chen, C. Guo, M. Yin, and W. Xu, “Energy transfer mechanism in Yb3+ doped YVO4 near-infrared downconversion phosphor,” J. Appl. Phys. 107(10), 103107 (2010). [CrossRef]
Y. Teng, J. Zhou, X. Liu, S. Ye, and J. Qiu, “Efficient broadband near-infrared quantum cutting for solar cells,” Opt. Express 18(9), 9671–9676 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
D. Chen, Y. Yu, H. Lin, P. Huang, Z. Shan, and Y. Wang, “Ultraviolet-blue to near-infrared downconversion of Nd(3+)-Yb(3+) couple,” Opt. Lett. 35(2), 220–222 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Near-infrared quantum cutting in transparent nanostructured glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 33(16), 1884–1886 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
X. Wei, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, M. Yin, and Y. Li, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Bi3+ to Yb3+ in Y2O3 phosphor,” Chin. Phys. B 19(7), 077804 (2010). [CrossRef]
S. Ye, B. Zhu, J. Luo, J. Chen, G. Lakshminarayana, and J. Qiu, “Enhanced cooperative quantum cutting in Tm3+- Yb3+ codoped glass ceramics containing LaF3 nanocrystals,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8989–8994 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Ce3+ to Yb3+ in borate glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(11), 116105 (2008). [CrossRef]
B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Near-Infrared Quantum Cutting for Photovoltaics,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(30), 3073–3077 (2009). [CrossRef]
J. J. Eilers, D. Biner, J. T. van Wijngaarden, K. Krämer, H.-U. Güdel, and A. Meijerink, “Efficient visible to infrared quantum cutting through downconversion with the Er3+–Yb3+ couple in Cs3Y2Br9,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(15), 151106 (2010). [CrossRef]
J. F. Suyver, J. Grimm, M. K. van Veen, D. Biner, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Upconversion spectroscopy and properties of NaYF4 doped with Er3+, Tm3+ and/or Yb3+,” J. Lumin. 117(1), 1–12 (2006). [CrossRef]
C. Li, Z. Quan, J. Yang, P. Yang, and J. Lin, “Highly Uniform and Monodisperse α-NaYF4:Ln3+ (Ln = Eu, Tb, Yb/Er, and Yb/Tm) Hexagonal Microprism Crystals: Hydrothermal Synthesis and Luminescent Properties,” Inorg. Chem. 46(16), 6329–6337 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
G. Blasse, and B. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials, (Springer-Verlag, 1994).
J. M. Meijer, L. Aarts, B. M. van der Ende, T. J. H. Vlugt, and A. Meijerink, “Downconversion for solar cells in YF3:Nd3+, Yb3+,” Phys. Rev. B 81(3), 035107 (2010). [CrossRef]

Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.)

B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Near-Infrared Quantum Cutting for Photovoltaics,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(30), 3073–3077 (2009). [CrossRef]

Appl. Phys. Lett.

J. J. Eilers, D. Biner, J. T. van Wijngaarden, K. Krämer, H.-U. Güdel, and A. Meijerink, “Efficient visible to infrared quantum cutting through downconversion with the Er3+–Yb3+ couple in Cs3Y2Br9,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(15), 151106 (2010). [CrossRef]

Chin. Phys. B

X. Wei, J. Zhao, Y. Chen, M. Yin, and Y. Li, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Bi3+ to Yb3+ in Y2O3 phosphor,” Chin. Phys. B 19(7), 077804 (2010). [CrossRef]

Energy Environ. Sci.

T. Ameri, G. Dennler, C. Lungenschmied, and C. J. Brabec, “Organic tandem solar cells: A review,” Energy Environ. Sci. 2(4), 347–363 (2009). [CrossRef]

Inorg. Chem.

C. Li, Z. Quan, J. Yang, P. Yang, and J. Lin, “Highly Uniform and Monodisperse α-NaYF4:Ln3+ (Ln = Eu, Tb, Yb/Er, and Yb/Tm) Hexagonal Microprism Crystals: Hydrothermal Synthesis and Luminescent Properties,” Inorg. Chem. 46(16), 6329–6337 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

J. Appl. Phys.

D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Quantum cutting downconversion by cooperative energy transfer from Ce3+ to Yb3+ in borate glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(11), 116105 (2008). [CrossRef]
T. Trupke, M. A. Green, and P. Würfel, “Improving solar cell efficiencies by down-conversion of high-energy photons,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(3), 1668 (2002). [CrossRef]
X. Wei, S. Huang, Y. Chen, C. Guo, M. Yin, and W. Xu, “Energy transfer mechanism in Yb3+ doped YVO4 near-infrared downconversion phosphor,” J. Appl. Phys. 107(10), 103107 (2010). [CrossRef]

J. Lumin.

J. F. Suyver, J. Grimm, M. K. van Veen, D. Biner, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Upconversion spectroscopy and properties of NaYF4 doped with Er3+, Tm3+ and/or Yb3+,” J. Lumin. 117(1), 1–12 (2006). [CrossRef]

Opt. Express

Opt. Lett.

Phys. Rev. B

P. Vergeer, T. J. H. Vlugt, M. H. F. Kox, M. I. den Hertog, J. P. J. M. van der Eerden, and A. Meijerink, “Quantum cutting by cooperative energy transfer in YbxY1-xPO4:Tb3+,” Phys. Rev. B 71(1), 014119 (2005). [CrossRef]
J. M. Meijer, L. Aarts, B. M. van der Ende, T. J. H. Vlugt, and A. Meijerink, “Downconversion for solar cells in YF3:Nd3+, Yb3+,” Phys. Rev. B 81(3), 035107 (2010). [CrossRef]

Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

B. S. Richards, “Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: Down-conversion,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(9), 1189–1207 (2006). [CrossRef]
C. Strumpel, M. McCann, G. Beaucarne, V. Arkhipov, A. Slaoui, V. Svrcek, C. del Canizo, and I. Tobias, “Modifying the solar spectrum to enhance silicon solar cell efficiency - An overview of available materials,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91(4), 238–249 (2007). [CrossRef]

Other

G. Blasse, and B. Grabmaier, Luminescent Materials, (Springer-Verlag, 1994).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper