OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 5 — Feb. 28, 2011
  • pp: 4756–4761
« Show journal navigation

Efficient transmission of crossing dielectric slot waveguides

Runzhou Su, Donghua Tang, Weiqiang Ding, Lixue Chen, and Zhongxiang Zhou  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 5, pp. 4756-4761 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.004756


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (813 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Transmission properties of two crossing dielectric slot waveguides (Si-Air-Si) are investigated using the finite difference in time domain method. Results show that the low transmission of this system mainly results from the reflection and radiation loss rather than the crosstalk. Using a simple method of filling up the crossing slots locally, the reflection, radiation losses and crosstalk are all greatly suppressed. With moderate parameters in this paper, the transmission efficient increases from 35.0% to more than 97% in a wide range of wavelength around 1.55μm. The results and method presented in this paper may be very useful in the application of slot waveguide in micro and nano photonics.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Recently, subwavelength slot waveguides have been intensively investigated due to its unique properties and potential applications. Generally speaking, there are two types of slot structures, i.e., plasmonic slot waveguide (PSWG) [1

1. J. A. Dionne, L. A. Sweatlock, H. A. Atwater, and A. Polman, “Plasmon slot waveguides: towards chip-scale propagation with subwavelength-scale localization,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 035407 (2006). [CrossRef]

, 2

2. G. Veronis and S. Fan, “Modes of subwavelength plasmonic slot waveguides,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25, 2511–2521 (2007). [CrossRef]

] and dielectric slot waveguide (DSWG) [3

3. V. R. Almeida, Q. Xu, C. A. Barrios, and M. Lipson, “Guiding and confining light in void nanostructure,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1209–1211 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 4

4. Q. Xu, V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1626–1628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For PSWG, the photonic energy is confined near the interface of a metal and a dielectric media. Due to the very small skin depth of metal, the confinement dimension can be as small as tens of nanometers. However, the disadvantage of PSWG is the loss of metal, which is absent in DSWG.

In this paper, we investigate the transmission characteristics of two crossing DSWGs using the finite difference in time domain (FDTD) method. For the direct crossing of DSWG’s, the transmission is only about 40%, and the crosstalk is about 10%, while the reflection and radiation losses are about 12% and 37%, respectively. By filling up the slots locally around the cross, a high transmission of 97.2% is achieved, and the crosstalk, reflection and radiation losses are decreased to 0.3%, 0.1% and 2%, respectively.

2. Method, results and discussion

The schematic structure investigated in this paper is formed by two crossing DSWGs along the x (DSWG-x) and y (DSWG-y) axes, respectively, as shown in Fig.1. The width and refractive index (RI) of the slot regions are ws = 70nm and ns = 1.0 (vacuum), respectively. The width and RI of the high refractive layers are wh and nh = 3.2, respectively. T, R, C and RL represent the normalized transmission, reflection, crosstalk and radiation loss coefficients, respectively. The slot waveguide is proposed to operate around the communication wavelength of 1.5μm. In order to decrease R, C and RL, the two segments of AxBx and AyBy with a length of l are filled up using high RI medium.

Fig. 1 Schematic structure and parameters of the crossing dielectric slot waveguide (DSWG). The width and refractive index (RI) of slot (yellow regions) and high RI media (light blue regions) are ws and ns, wh and nh, respectively. Around the cross center, the segments of AxBx and AyBy (dark blue regions, with a length of l) of the slots are filled up using high RI medium (nh). In, R, T, C and RL represent the incident, reflection, transmission, crosstalk and radiation loss, respectively. The two red arrows show the diffraction of the slot modes around the cross center.

Using the finite difference in time domain (FDTD) method, we analyze the normalized transmission (T), reflection (R), crosstalk (C) and radiation loss (RL) of the structure. In order to obtain accurate spectra, a short Gaussian pulse is excited at the left port of the individual DSWG-x (without the disturbance of DSWG-y), and the spectrum of T0(λ) at the right port of the DSWG-x is calculated. Then, the crossing DSWG-y is introduced, and the spectra of T1(λ), C1(λ), and R1(λ) are calculated at corresponding ports (with the same excitation source). Finally, the normalized coefficients are obtained by X(λ) = X1(λ)/T0(λ) (X to be T, R or C). According to the conservation of energy, the radiation loss is given by RL = 1 – TR – 2C.

Using the method mentioned above, we investigate the performances of the crossing DSWG with the parameters of ws = 70nm and wh = 160nm, and the results are shown in Fig.2. Fig.2(a) shows the normalized transmission T (line with circles, left y axis), radiation loss RL (line with triangles, right y axis), reflection R (line with squares, right y axis), and crosstalk (line with asterisks, right y axis), respectively. At the wavelength of 1.55μm, T is only about 35%, while the crosstalk is about 8%. The low transmission mainly results from high reflection of R = 12% and radiation loss of RL = 37%. Fig.2(b), (c) and (d) respectively show the steady field patterns of Ex, Ey and Hz at λ0 = 1550nm. Large radiation loss from the crossing center can be observed clearly.

Fig. 2 Spectra and field distributions of direct crossing with ws = 70nm, wh = 160nm, and nh = 3.2. (a) Spectra of transmission T (line with circles), radiation loss RL (line with triangles), reflection R (line with squares), and crosstalk C (line with asterisks). (b), (c) and (d) are the field distributions of Ex, Ey and Hz at the wavelength of λ0 = 1.55μm, respectively. Red and blue colors represent positive and negative values, respectively (All the color maps of field pattern figures in this paper are the same).

When the two segments of Ax,yBx,y are filled up by using high RI medium, we investigate the performances, and show the results in Fig.3. From Fig.3(a), one can find that T increases to 97.2%, while C, R, and RL decrease to 0.3%, 0.12% and 2.1%, respectively. Compare with Fig.2(a), the transmission increases from 35% to 97.2%, while the crosstalk C and reflection R both decrease to negligible small. The radiation loss RL decreases sharply from 37% to 2.1%. Fig.3(b), (c) and (d) shows the field patterns of Ex, Ey and Hz at λ0 = 1.55μm, respectively. Obviously, the radiation loss RL is efficiently suppressed comparing with Fig.2.

Fig. 3 Same as in Fig.2, except that the two segments of AxBx and AyBy with a length of l = 0.51μm are filled up using the high RI medium.

When the operation wavelength and the slot width ws are determined, the performances of the modified crossing are sensitively affected by the length l and width wh of the high RI layers. Fig.4(a) shows the changes of T (line with circles), RL (line with triangles), R (line with squares) and crosstalk C (line with asterisks) with l, while the width wh = 160nm is fixed. One can see that R, C and RL tend to minimums when l changes around 0.51μm, and T reaches to a peak value of 97.2%. Fig.4(b) shows the changes of T, RL, R and C with wh, and l = 0.50μm is fixed. Around the value of wh ∼ 0.155μm, T reaches the maximum of 96.0%, and R and RL both are about 2%, and the cross talk C is as small as 0.1%.

Fig. 4 Changes of T, RL, R, and C with l and wh at the wavelength of 1.55μm. (a) wh = 160nm and l ∈ (260, 650)nm. (b) l = 0.5μm and wh ∈ (110, 180)nm.

Now, let’s see the physical origins for the improvement of transmission in the modified crosses. We know that the slot waveguide only support TM modes (nonzero components of Ex, Ey and Hz). For a slot mode, the field of Ey is confined in a subwavelength slot region(ws = 70nm ∼ λ0/22 in this paper), and undergoes large reflection and strong diffraction when it transmits through the cross formed by DSWG-y, as denoted by the red arrows in Fig.1. Most part of the diffracted energy, however, can not be converted back into the guiding mode of DSWG-x due to the large mismatch of wave vector. One part of the diffraction energy results in crosstalk, and the other part radiates from the structure. This is the main reason of the radiation loss and crosstalk of the cross. This process can also be observed clearly from Fig.2.

When the segments of AxBx and AyBy are filled up with high RI (nh) material, the slot mode localized in the width of ws is convert into guiding mode in the slab with a width of w1 = ws + 2wh. In the current situation, w1 = 390nm is comparable with the wavelength λh (= 484nm) of light in the high RI medium. Therefore, the diffraction angle is greatly suppressed (compared with the diffraction of slot mode) when light propagates through the crossing region. Due to this process, the radiation loss and crosstalk are both greatly suppressed.

Although the filled segments of Ax,yBx,y can suppress the C and RL effectively as analyzed above, the suppression of R may be somewhat surprising because additional reflection would appear at the interfaces of slot waveguide and dielectric waveguide. The physical origins of this surprising point result from the Fabry-Perot-like (FP) behavior of the filled segments of Ax,yBx,y, which ensures maximum transmissions around the desired wavelength (1.55um in this paper) by the optimization of l and wh. From this point of view, the condition for maximum transmission is
ne×l=mλ0/2(misaninteger).
(1)
Here ne is the effective index of refraction in the filled segments, l is the length, and λ0 = 1.55μm is the operation wavelength in vacuum.

Using a mode analysis method and three-layer-planar-waveguide approximation of the filled segments, one can derive the value of ne for a group of parameters of (w,n1, n2, n3) for the 3-layer-plannar-waveguide. Here w and n2 are the thickness and RI of the core layer, respectively. n1,3 are the RI of the substrate and covering layers, respectively. In the crossing regions, however, the thickness of w changes from w1 = 2wh + ws to w2 → ∞ and w3 = l (as shown in Fig.1). The corresponding values of ne for w1,2,3 respectively are (with n1 = 3.2, n2 = n3 = 1.0)
ne(w1)=2.884,ne(w2)=3.20,ne(w3)=2.988
It is reasonable here to use the average value of e = [ne(h1) + ne(h2) + ne(h3)]/3 = 3.024 in Eq.(1). Substituting the values of l = 0.51μm, e = 3.024, and λ0 = 1.55μm into Eq.(1), one can obtain that m = 2ne × l/λ0 = 1.99 ≈ 2. This result shows that the suppression of reflection loss is result from the FP-like resonance of filled segments.

When the parameters of wh, l are optimized for a given wavelength at the case of θc = 90° crossing, results show that the structure is valid for θc in (80° ∼ 100°), as shown in Fig.5(a). When θc decreases from 90° to 83°, the transmission T is still above 95%, R and C [the average of C1 and C2 as shown in Fig5(b)] are both less than 0.6%, and the radiation loss RL reaches 4.1%. The performance can also be observed directly in Fig.5(b), which shows the field pattern of Hz at the case of θc = 85° and λ0 = 1.55μm. These results shows that the crossing of DSWG is insensitive to θc, which makes the experimental verification of these results easier.

Fig. 5 (a) Changes of T, RL, R, and C with the crossing angle θc at λ0 = 1.55μm. Here C is the average of C1 and C2 shown in (b). (b) Field pattern of Hz at the case of θc = 85°.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have investigated the crosses formed by two deep subwavelength dielectric slot waveguides (with a slot width < λ0/20) in a silicon-air-silicon system. Results show that the transmission performance is very poor at the case of direct crossing. Using a simple method of filling up a section of the slot region around the cross, the transmission efficiency increases from 35% to about 97.2% in a large bandwidth around 1.55μm, and a wide crossing angle of θc ∈ (80°,100°). The physical origins of improvement in transmission are analyzed in detail. What’s more, the improved cross is compact, and occupies an area of less than (λ0/2)2. The results and method presented in this paper are helpful for the applications of slot waveguide in nano-photonic systems.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) under grants 11004041 and 10874036.

References and links

1.

J. A. Dionne, L. A. Sweatlock, H. A. Atwater, and A. Polman, “Plasmon slot waveguides: towards chip-scale propagation with subwavelength-scale localization,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 035407 (2006). [CrossRef]

2.

G. Veronis and S. Fan, “Modes of subwavelength plasmonic slot waveguides,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25, 2511–2521 (2007). [CrossRef]

3.

V. R. Almeida, Q. Xu, C. A. Barrios, and M. Lipson, “Guiding and confining light in void nanostructure,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1209–1211 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

Q. Xu, V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1626–1628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

R. Yang, R. A. Wahsheh, Z. Lu, and M. A. G. Abushagur, “Efficient light coupling between dielectric slot waveguide and plasmonic slot waveguide,” Opt. Lett. 35, 649–651 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

G. Veronis and S. Fan, “Theoretical investigation of compact couplers between dielectric slab waveguides and two-dimensional metal-dielectric-metal plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Express 15, 1211–1221 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

C. Ma, Q. Zhang, and E. Van Keuren, “Direct integration of nanoscale conventional and slot waveguides,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 2524–2527 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

X. Chen, W. Jiang, J. Chen, L. Gu, and R. T. Chenb, “20 dB-enhanced coupling to slot photonic crystal waveguide using multimode interference coupler,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 091111 (2007). [CrossRef]

9.

A. D. Falco, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Dispersion control and slow light in slotted photonic crystal waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 083501 (2008). [CrossRef]

10.

C. A. Barrios, K. B. Gylfason, B. Sánchez, A. Griol, H. Sohlström, M. Holgado, and R. Casquel, “Slot-waveguide biochemical sensor,” Opt. Lett. 32, 3080–3082 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

A. D. Falco, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Chemical sensing in slotted photonic crystal heterostructure cavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 063503 (2009). [CrossRef]

12.

J. H. Wülbern, J. Hampe, A. Petrov, M. Eich, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, A. D. Falco, T. F. Krauss, and J. Bruns, “Electro-optic modulation in slotted resonant photonic crystal heterostructures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 241107 (2009). [CrossRef]

13.

A. Martínez, J. Blasco, P. Sanchis, J. V. Galan, J. García-Rupérez, E. Jordana, P. Gautier, Y. Lebour, S. Hernandez, R. Spano, R. Guider, N. Daldosso, B. Garrido, J. M. Fedeli, L. Pavesi, and J. Martí, “Ultrafast all-optical switching in a silicon-nanocrystal-based silicon slot waveguide at telecom wavelengths,” Nano Lett. 10, 1506–1511 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

M. Komatsu, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “Design of miniaturized silicon wire and slot waveguide polarization splitter based on a resonant tunneling,” Opt. Express 17, 19225–19234 (2009). [CrossRef]

15.

A. Mekis, J. C. Chen, I. Kurland, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “High transmission through sharp bends in photonic crystals waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3787–3790 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

S. Johnson, C. Manolatou, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, J. D. Joannopoulos, and H. A. Haus, “Elimination of cross talk in waveguide intersections,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1855–1857 (1998). [CrossRef]

17.

C. Manolatou, S. Johnson, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, H. A. Haus, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “High-density integrated optics”, J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 1682–1692 (1999). [CrossRef]

18.

W. Bogaerts, P. Dumon, D. V. Thourhout, and R. Baets, “Low-loss, low-cross-talk crossings for silicon-on-insulator nanophotonic waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 32, 2801–2803 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

P. Sanchis, P. Villalba, F. Cuesta, A. Håkansson, A. Griol, J. V. Galán, A. Brimont, and J. Martí “Highly efficient crossing structure for silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 34, 2760–2762 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

J. Feng, Q. Li, and S. Fan, “Compact and low cross-talk silicon-on-insulator crossing using a periodic dielectric waveguide,” Opt. Lett. 35, 3904–3906 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21.

W. Ding, D. Tang, Y. Liu, L. Chen, and X. Sun, “Compact and low crosstalk waveguide crossing using impedance matched metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 111114 (2010). [CrossRef]

22.

W. Ding, D. Tang, Y. Liu, L. Chen, and X. Sun, “Arbitrary waveguide bends using isotropic and homogeneous metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 041102 (2010). [CrossRef]

23.

P. A. Anderson, B. S. Schmidt, and M. Lipson, “High confinement in silicon slot waveguides with sharp bends,” Opt. Express 14, 9197–9202 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

C. Ma, Q. Zhang, and E. V. Keuren, “Right-angle slot waveguide bends with high bending efficiency,” Opt. Express 16, 14330–14334 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

C. Ma, S. Qi, Q. Zhang, and E. Van Keuren, “High efficiency right-angle bending structures in continuous slot waveguides,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 105702 (2009). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(230.3120) Optical devices : Integrated optics devices
(230.7370) Optical devices : Waveguides

ToC Category:
Integrated Optics

History
Original Manuscript: January 4, 2011
Revised Manuscript: February 10, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: February 14, 2011
Published: February 25, 2011

Citation
Runzhou Su, Donghua Tang, Weiqiang Ding, Lixue Chen, and Zhongxiang Zhou, "Efficient transmission of crossing dielectric slot waveguides," Opt. Express 19, 4756-4761 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-5-4756


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. A. Dionne, L. A. Sweatlock, H. A. Atwater, and A. Polman, “Plasmon slot waveguides: towards chip-scale propagation with subwavelength-scale localization,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 035407 (2006). [CrossRef]
  2. G. Veronis, and S. Fan, “Modes of subwavelength plasmonic slot waveguides,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25, 2511–2521 (2007). [CrossRef]
  3. V. R. Almeida, Q. Xu, C. A. Barrios, and M. Lipson, “Guiding and confining light in void nanostructure,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1209–1211 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Q. Xu, V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1626–1628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. R. Yang, R. A. Wahsheh, Z. Lu, and M. A. G. Abushagur, “Efficient light coupling between dielectric slot waveguide and plasmonic slot waveguide,” Opt. Lett. 35, 649–651 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. G. Veronis, and S. Fan, “Theoretical investigation of compact couplers between dielectric slab waveguides and two-dimensional metal-dielectric-metal plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Express 15, 1211–1221 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. C. Ma, Q. Zhang, and E. Van Keuren, “Direct integration of nanoscale conventional and slot waveguides,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 2524–2527 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. X. Chen, W. Jiang, J. Chen, L. Gu, and R. T. Chenb, “20 dB-enhanced coupling to slot photonic crystal waveguide using multimode interference coupler,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 091111 (2007). [CrossRef]
  9. A. D. Falco, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Dispersion control and slow light in slotted photonic crystal waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 083501 (2008). [CrossRef]
  10. C. A. Barrios, K. B. Gylfason, B. Sánchez, A. Griol, H. Sohlström, M. Holgado, and R. Casquel, “Slot-waveguide biochemical sensor,” Opt. Lett. 32, 3080–3082 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. D. Falco, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Chemical sensing in slotted photonic crystal heterostructure cavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 063503 (2009). [CrossRef]
  12. J. H. Wülbern, J. Hampe, A. Petrov, M. Eich, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, A. D. Falco, T. F. Krauss, and J. Bruns, “Electro-optic modulation in slotted resonant photonic crystal heterostructures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 241107 (2009). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Martínez, J. Blasco, P. Sanchis, J. V. Galan, J. García-Rupérez, E. Jordana, P. Gautier, Y. Lebour, S. Hernandez, R. Spano, R. Guider, N. Daldosso, B. Garrido, J. M. Fedeli, L. Pavesi, and J. Martí, “Ultrafast all-optical switching in a silicon-nanocrystal-based silicon slot waveguide at telecom wavelengths,” Nano Lett. 10, 1506–1511 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. M. Komatsu, K. Saitoh, and M. Koshiba, “Design of miniaturized silicon wire and slot waveguide polarization splitter based on a resonant tunneling,” Opt. Express 17, 19225–19234 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. A. Mekis, J. C. Chen, I. Kurland, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “High transmission through sharp bends in photonic crystals waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3787–3790 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. S. Johnson, C. Manolatou, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, J. D. Joannopoulos, and H. A. Haus, “Elimination of cross talk in waveguide intersections,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1855–1857 (1998). [CrossRef]
  17. C. Manolatou, S. Johnson, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, H. A. Haus, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “High-density integrated optics,” J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 1682–1692 (1999). [CrossRef]
  18. W. Bogaerts, P. Dumon, D. V. Thourhout, and R. Baets, “Low-loss, low-cross-talk crossings for silicon-oninsulator nanophotonic waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 32, 2801–2803 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. P. Sanchis, P. Villalba, F. Cuesta, A. Håkansson, A. Griol, J. V. Galán, A. Brimont, and J. Martí. “Highly efficient crossing structure for silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 34, 2760–2762 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. J. Feng, Q. Li, and S. Fan, “Compact and low cross-talk silicon-on-insulator crossing using a periodic dielectric waveguide,” Opt. Lett. 35, 3904–3906 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. W. Ding, D. Tang, Y. Liu, L. Chen, and X. Sun, “Compact and low crosstalk waveguide crossing using impedance matched metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 111114 (2010). [CrossRef]
  22. W. Ding, D. Tang, Y. Liu, L. Chen, and X. Sun, “Arbitrary waveguide bends using isotropic and homogeneous metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 041102 (2010). [CrossRef]
  23. P. A. Anderson, B. S. Schmidt, and M. Lipson, “High confinement in silicon slot waveguides with sharp bends,” Opt. Express 14, 9197–9202 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. C. Ma, Q. Zhang, and E. V. Keuren, “Right-angle slot waveguide bends with high bending efficiency,” Opt. Express 16, 14330–14334 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. C. Ma, S. Qi, Q. Zhang, and E. Van Keuren, “High efficiency right-angle bending structures in continuous slot waveguides,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 105702 (2009). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited