OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 8 — Apr. 11, 2011
  • pp: 7530–7536
« Show journal navigation

Ultra-low power fiber-coupled gallium arsenide photonic crystal cavity electro-optic modulator

Gary Shambat, Bryan Ellis, Marie A. Mayer, Arka Majumdar, Eugene E. Haller, and Jelena Vučković  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 8, pp. 7530-7536 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.007530


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1020 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We demonstrate a gallium arsenide photonic crystal cavity injection-based electro-optic modulator coupled to a fiber taper waveguide. The fiber taper serves as a convenient and tunable waveguide for cavity coupling with minimal loss. Localized electrical injection of carriers into the cavity region via a laterally doped p-i-n diode combined with the small mode volume of the cavity enable ultra-low energy modulation at sub-fJ/bit levels. Speeds of up to 1 GHz are demonstrated with photoluminescence lifetime measurements revealing that the ultimate limit goes well into the tens of GHz.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

2. Design and fabrication

The modulator design is based on a waveguide coupled to a cavity, similar to waveguide coupled SOI ring resonators. In this implementation a fiber taper serves as an adjustable waveguide and the cavity is formed out of an L3 photonic crystal defect [9

9. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425(6961), 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Having a fiber taper for the waveguide allows for careful control of the loaded Q factor and transmission of the signal, as well as enables high power testing since there is minimal loss in the setup. Finite-difference time domain simulations showed that fiber taper loaded Q factors can be over 10,000 for cavities at 1500 nm and the transmission as low as 0.13 at the cavity center wavelength.

Modulator devices were formed out of a 135 nm thick gallium arsenide membrane grown on top of a 1.35 μm thick sacrificial Al0.9Ga0.1As layer using MBE. Successive electron beam lithography steps defined the lateral implantation regions using a silicon nitride hard mask. The P region was formed by ion implantion of beryllium ions with an energy of 19 keV and a dose of 2.5x1015 cm−2. The N region was formed by ion implantation of silicon ions at an energy of 71 keV and a dose of 3x1014 cm−2. A 15s rapid thermal anneal at 850 C activated the beryllium to acceptor concentrations of 2∙1019 cm−3 and the silicon to donor concentrations of 2∙1018 cm−3. To prevent arsenic outdiffusion during annealing, a thin nitride cap was used. The photonic crystal cavities were patterned with e-beam lithography and dry-etched in a BCl3/Cl2 chemistry. Cavities were fabricated with a lattice constant a = 480 nm and hole radii r/a = 0.23-27. Finally, a Au/Ge/Ni/Au n-type contact and a Au/Zn/Au p-type contact were deposited and the membranes were released by wet etching the sacrificial layer. For more details on the lateral PIN structure, see [10

10. B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. An SEM image of a completed cavity is shown in Fig. 1(a)
Fig. 1 (a) SEM image of a fabricated laterally doped PIN photonic crystal diode. Dashed lines indicate the approximate boundaries of the doped regions. The scale bar is 1 μm. (b) Experimental setup for probing the cavity DC transmission characteristics (green path) as well as RF modulation performance (blue path). OSA is optical spectrum analyzer, PD is photodiode, and Pol. C. is polarization controller. The cavity is outlined in the yellow box at the center of the optical picture of the setup and a fiber taper of 1 μm in diameter is seen aligned vertically. DC and RF voltages are applied to the metal contact pads to the left and right of the cavity. The scale bar is 10 μm.
, where the dashed lines indicate the doping regions surrounding an intrinsic layer about 600 nm wide. The fiber taper was fabricated as in [11

11. G. Shambat, Y. Gong, J. Lu, S. Yerci, R. Li, L. Dal Negro, and J. Vucković, “Coupled fiber taper extraction of 1.53 microm photoluminescence from erbium doped silicon nitride photonic crystal cavities,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5964–5973 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and had a 1 μm waist for coupling to the PC cavities. Total fiber loss was less than 3 dB.

3. Experiment

3.1. DC modulation

DC modulation was first performed to determine the electro-optic tuning properties of our device. The fiber taper was aligned along the long axis of the L3 cavity and positioned at a slight offset from the cavity (Fig. 1(b)), thus finding a good compromise between high Q and transmission. This ability to relocate the fiber taper to various positions allows easy optimization of the cavity coupling [12

12. G. Shambat, K. Rivoire, J. Lu, F. Hatami, and J. Vucković, “Tunable-wavelength second harmonic generation from GaP photonic crystal cavities coupled to fiber tapers,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12176–12184 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and correspondingly modulator performance. At zero bias the Q of our cavity is 4130, lower than expected due to free carrier absorption (FCA) from the nearby doped regions. Other cavities fabricated on the same chip with no nearby doped regions had consistently higher quality factors, confirming the source of the loss. This value can be increased in the future by spacing out the doping regions by another few hundred nm.

3.2. RF modulation

Low speed modulation was accomplished by sending a fiber-coupled tunable laser through one end of the cavity-coupled fiber taper (Fig. 1(b)). An in-line polarization controller was used to maximize the coupling to the fundamental transverse electric cavity mode and the laser wavelength was adjusted to match the steep slope of the resonance for greater contrast. A function generator signal of 2 kHz was applied to the contacts and the resultant response of a photodiode was recorded on an oscilloscope. The output modulated light for a positive swing voltage of only 1 V is seen in Fig. 3(a)
Fig. 3 (a) Operation of the modulator at 2 kHz using a 0 to 1 V square wave function. A low noise photodetector was connected to an oscilloscope for voltage visualization. (b) 100 MHz modulation from a −1.5V to 1.5V signal using a photodetector with an RF amplifier connected to the oscilloscope. (c) 1 GHz modulation with the device in the same configuration as (b). The detector is at its −3 dB point and so the signal is distorted.
, with a contrast of 10%. As mentioned before, we are limited in our contrast for this particular sample due to the injection saturation caused by the parasitic current pathway; however for future devices we should be able to correct this problem.

To confirm fast switching behavior due to free carriers, we applied a 100 MHz electrical signal to our modulator and monitor the optical transmission response on a PIN photodiode with a built-in high frequency amplifier with a cutoff frequency of 1 GHz (Menlo Systems FPD 310) to better see our output. Custom high-speed probes from Cascade Microtech were used that allowed clearance between the probe tips for the fiber taper. The result in Fig. 3(b) again shows clear modulation by our device. The swing voltages for this plot are from −1.5V to 1.5V and are larger than the low frequency experiment in order to better see the signal, as the RF circuit in the detector has higher noise. Figure 3(c) shows the response at 1 GHz. Even though we are at the frequency limit of our detector equipment, we still observe modulation by our photonic crystal cavity diode. Additionally, we note that we can operate our modulator with mW laser power levels since our low Q cavity reduces two-photon absorption which causes additional FCA and cavity linewidth broadening [14

14. T. Tanabe, H. Sumikura, H. Taniyama, A. Shinya, and M. Notomi, “All-silicon sub-Gb/s telecom detector with low dark current and high quantum efficiency on chip,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(10), 101103 (2010). [CrossRef]

].

3.3. Carrier lifetime

The maximum speed of our modulator is expected to be limited by the transient carrier dynamics; namely, the pull-up and pull-down speeds are roughly equivalent to the total carrier lifetime. In gallium arsenide photonic crystals, carriers recombine most rapidly due to nonradiative recombination at the etched hole surfaces [15

15. D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, “Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(7), 071124 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. To measure the total carrier lifetime we perform time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) measurements of the GaAs band-edge at room temperature. The devices are pumped by a Ti:Sapphire laser with 3 ps pulses at 80 MHz repetition rate and the PL is measured with a streak camera as in [15

15. D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, “Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(7), 071124 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. As Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Lifetime of gallium arsenide band edge PL as detected by a streak camera. The sample is pumped locally at the PC cavity defect by 3 ps Ti:Sapphire laser pulses. The decay consists of a fast component (PC cavity) and slower background component.
shows, the decay is very fast, corresponding to a lifetime of approximately 6 ps. This value agrees well with [15

15. D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, “Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(7), 071124 (2007). [CrossRef]

], since the decay rate has a square root dependence on temperature and the measured value in the former study at 30 K was 35 ps. Therefore, the ultimate speed of this device should be well in the tens of GHz.

4. Discussion

The small mode volume of the PC cavity and the high free carrier dispersion in GaAs result in an extremely low switching energy. For an injection-based modulator, the total energy per bit can be quantified by summing the DC energy and the transient switching energy [16

16. S. Manipatruni, K. Preston, L. Chen, and M. Lipson, “Ultra-low voltage, ultra-small mode volume silicon microring modulator,” Opt. Express 18(17), 18235–18242 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The DC power is PDC = 0.5(IV), where 0.5 is used because DC current only flows half the time for a random bit sequence. From above, the current is 200 nA and the voltage is 1 V, hence the power is 100 nW. For 100 MHz modulation the energy per bit is thus EDC = 1 fJ/bit and for 1 GHz modulation, EDC = 0.1 fJ/bit. The transient switching energy is given by the integral of the product of current and voltage over an injection cycle (weighted by 0.25 since injection occurs for one out of four bit transitions), or Etrans = 0.25QinV, where Qin is the injected charge. We can approximate the injected charge by multiplying the mode volume of the cavity by the required charge density needed for a 110 pm blueshift in GaAs. For this L3 cavity the mode volume is ~0.06 μm3 and from [6

6. B. R. Bennett, R. A. Soref, and J. A. Del Alamo, “Carrier-induced change in refractive index of InP, GaAs, and InGaAsP,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26(1), 113–122 (1990). [CrossRef]

], the carrier density in GaAs corresponding to such a shift should be 4.4∙1016 cm−3. Therefore at 1 V we find Etrans = 0.1 fJ/bit. Thus our modulator operates clearly at 1.1 fJ/bit for 100 MHz and 0.2 fJ/bit for 1 GHz.

Cavity-waveguide modulator energies are the sum total of switching energy and heater energy needed for wavelength stabilization in the case of high Q cavities [4

4. P. Dong, S. Liao, D. Feng, H. Liang, D. Zheng, R. Shafiiha, C.-C. Kung, W. Qian, G. Li, X. Zheng, A. V. Krishnamoorthy, and M. Asghari, “Low Vpp, ultralow-energy, compact, high-speed silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22484–22490 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Our present modulator can be modified to either work with high contrast in either a high Q or low Q configuration. For high Q operation, the doping regions should be spaced out farther to prevent free carrier absorption. The above shift of 110 pm corresponds to a linewidth of the cavity with a Q of 14,000 - the value that should be reachable on our platform. Such a device would preserve the ~0.2 fJ/bit switching energy, but requires a heater for thermal stabilization, which dissipates additional energy. On the other hand, for the low Q operation regime (such as in this article), we would need to eliminate the injection saturation caused by the current leakage path in order to shift the cavity by a full linewidth. This would increase Etrans by a factor of four, but could eliminate the need for the stabilizing heater (as the linewidth is much broader, and hence, the system cannot be impacted significantly by thermal instabilities).

An additional implementation of this laterally doped scheme would be a reverse-biased diode modulator. Free-carrier removal by increasing the depletion width is often a faster and lower energy process than carrier injection through forward biasing [4

4. P. Dong, S. Liao, D. Feng, H. Liang, D. Zheng, R. Shafiiha, C.-C. Kung, W. Qian, G. Li, X. Zheng, A. V. Krishnamoorthy, and M. Asghari, “Low Vpp, ultralow-energy, compact, high-speed silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22484–22490 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. In the current experiment we have not optimized the doping concentrations and spacing between doped regions for this mode of operation, but this should be easy to design and implement. Finally, we note that all of the performance parameters could be improved in either configuration by reducing the series resistance of the diode, found here to be a few hundred kΩ, dominated by a bad contact resistance. We have observed diode series resistances as low as 1 kΩ in similar structures [13

13. B. Ellis, M. Mayer, G. Shambat, T. Sarmiento, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Ultra-low threshold, electrically pumped quantum dot photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” to be published in Nat. Photonics (2011).

] indicating that PC holes have minimal impact on the electronic transport through membranes.

5. Conclusion

In summary, we have investigated a novel PC electro-optic modulator consisting of a GaAs cavity coupled to a fiber taper probe. The fiber taper serves as a reconfigurable waveguide that can modify the transmission and quality factor of our devices. Modulation of a probe laser beam was observed at 1 GHz with the ultimate speed of the device likely to be in the tens of GHz, due to rapid carrier recombination at PC hole surfaces. Energy calculations showed that even at 100 MHz the switching energy per bit is only ~1 fJ. We believe that simple improvements to the modulator design could allow high contrast operation at over 10 GHz speed with switching energies well below 1 fJ/bit.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Interconnect Focus Center, one of six research centers funded under the Focus Center Research Program (FCRP), a Semiconductor Research Corporation entity, and of the AFOSR MURI for Complex and Robust On-chip Nanophotonics (Dr. Gernot Pomrenke), grant number FA9550-09-1-0704. Gary Shambat and Bryan Ellis would like to thank the Stanford Graduate Fellowship for support. Gary Shambat is also supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) GRFP. Marie Mayer was supported by the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate NDSEG_Fellowship, 32 CFR 168a, through the DoD, Air Force Office of Scientific Research. The fabrication has been performed in the Stanford Nanofabrication Facilities of NNIN supported by the National Science Foundation. The characterization of the devices was conducted in part at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory which is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

References and links

1.

W. M. Green, M. J. Rooks, L. Sekaric, and Y. A. Vlasov, “Ultra-compact, low RF power, 10 Gb/s silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” Opt. Express 15(25), 17106–17113 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

Q. Xu, B. Schmidt, S. Pradhan, and M. Lipson, “Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator,” Nature 435(7040), 325–327 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

T. Tanabe, K. Nishiguchi, E. Kuramochi, and M. Notomi, “Low power and fast electro-optic silicon modulator with lateral p-i-n embedded photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22505–22513 (2009). [CrossRef]

4.

P. Dong, S. Liao, D. Feng, H. Liang, D. Zheng, R. Shafiiha, C.-C. Kung, W. Qian, G. Li, X. Zheng, A. V. Krishnamoorthy, and M. Asghari, “Low Vpp, ultralow-energy, compact, high-speed silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22484–22490 (2009). [CrossRef]

5.

D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]

6.

B. R. Bennett, R. A. Soref, and J. A. Del Alamo, “Carrier-induced change in refractive index of InP, GaAs, and InGaAsP,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26(1), 113–122 (1990). [CrossRef]

7.

K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, A. Shinya, S. Matsuo, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, “Sub-femtojoule all-optical switching using a photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Nat. Photonics 4(7), 477–483 (2010). [CrossRef]

8.

D. Englund, B. Ellis, E. Edwards, T. Sarmiento, J. S. Harris, D. A. B. Miller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically controlled modulation in a photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 17(18), 15409–15419 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425(6961), 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]

11.

G. Shambat, Y. Gong, J. Lu, S. Yerci, R. Li, L. Dal Negro, and J. Vucković, “Coupled fiber taper extraction of 1.53 microm photoluminescence from erbium doped silicon nitride photonic crystal cavities,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5964–5973 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

G. Shambat, K. Rivoire, J. Lu, F. Hatami, and J. Vucković, “Tunable-wavelength second harmonic generation from GaP photonic crystal cavities coupled to fiber tapers,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12176–12184 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

B. Ellis, M. Mayer, G. Shambat, T. Sarmiento, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Ultra-low threshold, electrically pumped quantum dot photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” to be published in Nat. Photonics (2011).

14.

T. Tanabe, H. Sumikura, H. Taniyama, A. Shinya, and M. Notomi, “All-silicon sub-Gb/s telecom detector with low dark current and high quantum efficiency on chip,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(10), 101103 (2010). [CrossRef]

15.

D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, “Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(7), 071124 (2007). [CrossRef]

16.

S. Manipatruni, K. Preston, L. Chen, and M. Lipson, “Ultra-low voltage, ultra-small mode volume silicon microring modulator,” Opt. Express 18(17), 18235–18242 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(230.3120) Optical devices : Integrated optics devices
(230.5750) Optical devices : Resonators
(350.4238) Other areas of optics : Nanophotonics and photonic crystals
(250.4110) Optoelectronics : Modulators

ToC Category:
Optoelectronics

History
Original Manuscript: February 22, 2011
Revised Manuscript: March 24, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: March 25, 2011
Published: April 4, 2011

Citation
Gary Shambat, Bryan Ellis, Marie A. Mayer, Arka Majumdar, Eugene E. Haller, and Jelena Vučković, "Ultra-low power fiber-coupled gallium arsenide photonic crystal cavity electro-optic modulator," Opt. Express 19, 7530-7536 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-8-7530


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. M. Green, M. J. Rooks, L. Sekaric, and Y. A. Vlasov, “Ultra-compact, low RF power, 10 Gb/s silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” Opt. Express 15(25), 17106–17113 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Q. Xu, B. Schmidt, S. Pradhan, and M. Lipson, “Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator,” Nature 435(7040), 325–327 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. T. Tanabe, K. Nishiguchi, E. Kuramochi, and M. Notomi, “Low power and fast electro-optic silicon modulator with lateral p-i-n embedded photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22505–22513 (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Dong, S. Liao, D. Feng, H. Liang, D. Zheng, R. Shafiiha, C.-C. Kung, W. Qian, G. Li, X. Zheng, A. V. Krishnamoorthy, and M. Asghari, “Low Vpp, ultralow-energy, compact, high-speed silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22484–22490 (2009). [CrossRef]
  5. D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. B. R. Bennett, R. A. Soref, and J. A. Del Alamo, “Carrier-induced change in refractive index of InP, GaAs, and InGaAsP,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26(1), 113–122 (1990). [CrossRef]
  7. K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, A. Shinya, S. Matsuo, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, “Sub-femtojoule all-optical switching using a photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Nat. Photonics 4(7), 477–483 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. D. Englund, B. Ellis, E. Edwards, T. Sarmiento, J. S. Harris, D. A. B. Miller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically controlled modulation in a photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 17(18), 15409–15419 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425(6961), 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]
  11. G. Shambat, Y. Gong, J. Lu, S. Yerci, R. Li, L. Dal Negro, and J. Vucković, “Coupled fiber taper extraction of 1.53 microm photoluminescence from erbium doped silicon nitride photonic crystal cavities,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5964–5973 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. G. Shambat, K. Rivoire, J. Lu, F. Hatami, and J. Vucković, “Tunable-wavelength second harmonic generation from GaP photonic crystal cavities coupled to fiber tapers,” Opt. Express 18(12), 12176–12184 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. B. Ellis, M. Mayer, G. Shambat, T. Sarmiento, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Ultra-low threshold, electrically pumped quantum dot photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” to be published in Nat. Photonics (2011).
  14. T. Tanabe, H. Sumikura, H. Taniyama, A. Shinya, and M. Notomi, “All-silicon sub-Gb/s telecom detector with low dark current and high quantum efficiency on chip,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(10), 101103 (2010). [CrossRef]
  15. D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, “Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(7), 071124 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. S. Manipatruni, K. Preston, L. Chen, and M. Lipson, “Ultra-low voltage, ultra-small mode volume silicon microring modulator,” Opt. Express 18(17), 18235–18242 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited