OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 9 — Apr. 25, 2011
  • pp: 7929–7936
« Show journal navigation

Direct femtosecond laser waveguide writing inside zinc phosphate glass

Luke B. Fletcher, Jon J. Witcher, Neil Troy, Signo T. Reis, Richard K. Brow, and Denise M. Krol  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 9, pp. 7929-7936 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.007929


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1294 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We report the relationship between the initial glass composition and the resulting microstructural changes after direct femtosecond laser waveguide writing with a 1 kHz repetition rate Ti:sapphire laser system. A zinc polyphosphate glass composition with an oxygen to phosphorus ratio of 3.25 has demonstrated positive refractive index changes induced inside the focal volume of a focusing microscope objective for laser pulse energies that can achieve intensities above the modification threshold. The permanent photo-induced changes can be used for direct fabrication of optical waveguides using single scan writing techniques. Changes to the localized glass network structure that produce positive changes in the refractive index of zinc phosphate glasses upon femtosecond laser irradiation have been studied using scanning confocal micro-Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

Femtosecond lasers pulses in the near IR, when focused inside transparent glass substrates, can achieve high enough intensities to give rise to permanent modification of the glass structure. Such photo-induced modifications often result in a change in the refractive index of the glass that is highly confined to the focal volume of a high NA lens or microscope objective [1

1. D. Du, X. Liu, G. Korn, J. Squier, and G. Mourou, “Laser-induced breakdown by impact ionization in Si02 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(23), 3071–3073 (1994). [CrossRef]

,2

2. B. C. Stuart, M. D. Feit, S. Herman, A. M. Rubenchik, B. W. Shore, and M. D. Perry, “Nanosecond-to-femtosecond laser-induced breakdown in dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 53(4), 1749–1761 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. By translating the glass with respect to the focal volume it is possible to fabricate 3-D subsurface optical waveguides with high spatial precision in a variety of optical materials [3

3. K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, and K. Hirao, “Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser,” Opt. Lett. 21(21), 1729–1731 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7

7. R. R. Gattass and E. Mazur, “Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials,” Nat. Photonics 2(4), 219–225 (2008). [CrossRef]

].

Phosphate glasses can incorporate large concentrations of rare earth ions [8

8. M. J. Weber, “Science and technology of laser glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 123(1-3), 208–222 (1990). [CrossRef]

], making them an ideal host materials for fabricating compact high-gain waveguide lasers and amplifiers that operate in the C-band [9

9. R. Osellame, S. Taccheo, G. Cerullo, M. Marangoni, D. Polli, R. Ramponi, P. Laporta, and S. De Silvestri, “Optical gain in Er-Yb doped waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Electron. Lett. 38(17), 964–965 (2002). [CrossRef]

,10

10. S. Taccheo, G. Della Valle, R. Osellame, G. Cerullo, N. Chiodo, P. Laporta, O. Svelto, A. Killi, U. Morgner, M. Lederer, and D. Kopf, “Er:Yb-doped waveguide laser fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Lett. 29(22), 2626–2628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, many phosphate glasses will typically exhibit or favor negative changes to the index of refraction inside the fs-laser irradiated region [11

11. V. R. Bhardwaj, E. Simova, P. B. Corkum, D. M. Rayner, C. Hnatovsky, R. S. Taylor, B. Schreder, M. Kluge, and J. Zimmer, “Femtosecond laser-induced refractive index modification in multicomponent glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 97(8), 083102 (2005). [CrossRef]

,12

12. J. W. Chan, T. R. Huser, S. H. Risbud, J. S. Hayden, and D. M. Krol, “Waveguide fabrication in phosphate glasses using femtosecond laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(15), 2371–2373 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. As a consequence, high quality single-mode waveguides cannot be easily fabricated by direct waveguide writing techniques. Femtosecond laser writing in commercially available phosphate glasses, such as Schott IOG-1 or Kigre Er-Yb QX and MM2a glass, has demonstrated that both the magnitude and the sign of the induced net refractive index change inside the focal volume is highly sensitive to the fs-laser writing conditions [13

13. M. Ams, G. D. Marshall, P. Dekker, M. Dubov, V. K. Mezentsev, I. Bennion, and M. J. Withford, “Investigation of ultrafast laser–photonic material interactions: challenges for directly written glass photonics,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(5), 1370–1381 (2008). [CrossRef]

19

19. A. Ferrer, A. Ruiz de la Cruz, D. Puerto, W. Gawelda, J. A. Vallés, M. A. Rebolledo, V. Berdejo, J. Siegel, and J. Solis, “In situ assessment and minimization of nonlinear propagation effects for femtosecond-laser waveguide writing in dielectrics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(8), 1688–1692 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. The resulting micro-structure changes, induced by femtosecond laser inscription, result in complex refractive index profiles that can be used for waveguiding only when very specific combinations of laser processing parameters are used, thus limiting the effectiveness of these glasses as substrates for direct fs-laser waveguide writing. Progress in fs-laser micromachining can be greatly enhanced by utilizing phosphate glass compositions that can yield good waveguides when fabricated under a wider range of laser processing conditions.

While much attention has focused on the writing techniques used to achieve positive changes to the refractive index, the dependence on the initial glass composition has often been overlooked. It is important to understand the relationships between the initial composition of simple phosphate glasses and the structural changes that result from fs-laser modification. To date, no study has been performed which has systematically examined how changes to the initial glass structure effect the resulting changes after fs-laser modification. Zinc phosphate glasses are excellent candidates to examine both the fundamental relationships of this interaction as well as provide a suitable glass structure to investigate the desired positive changes to the refractive index. Zinc phosphate glasses are excellent optical materials to study this phenomenon due to three important characteristics:
  • (i) Zinc phosphate glasses have structures based on linkages between corner-shared Zn- and P-tetrahedra. Fused silica glass also has a tetrahedral network and the resulting open structures are believed to be associated with anomalous temperature-dependence of a variety of properties, including thermal expansion, acoustic absorption, and sound velocity [20

    20. R. K. Brow, “Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 263–264,1–28 (2000). [CrossRef]

    24

    24. J. T. Krause and C. R. Kurkjian, “Vibrational anomalies in inorganic glass formers,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51(4), 226–227 (1968). [CrossRef]

    ], for both fused silica and the zinc phosphate glasses.
  • (ii) Zinc phosphate glasses can be prepared in a wide range of compositions to support studies of the relationships between glass structures and properties [21

    21. R. K. Brow, D. R. Tallant, S. T. Myers, and C. C. Phifer, “The short-range structure of zinc polyphosphate glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 191(1-2), 45–55 (1995). [CrossRef]

    ].
  • (iii) Due to its large glass forming range beyond the metaphosphate composition, the zinc phosphate glass system is one of only a few binary phosphate glass systems that provides an open phosphate chain-like structure that is capable of incorporating high concentrations of rare earth ions without concentration quenching effects as a result of ion clustering [8

    8. M. J. Weber, “Science and technology of laser glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 123(1-3), 208–222 (1990). [CrossRef]

    ,21

    21. R. K. Brow, D. R. Tallant, S. T. Myers, and C. C. Phifer, “The short-range structure of zinc polyphosphate glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 191(1-2), 45–55 (1995). [CrossRef]

    ].
In this paper we will show that variations in glass composition within the metaphosphate and polyphosphate regime, 3.5 ≥ [O]/[P] ≥ 3.0, have a direct effect on the glass network structure and initial glass properties resulting in different responses to femtosecond laser waveguide writing. The observed micro-structure, refractive index, and guiding properties of the waveguides indicate that the initial glass network affects the resulting morphological changes to the glass after modification by femtosecond pulses. Waveguides fabricated in glasses with [O]/[P] ratio of 3.25, at fs-laser pulse fluences below 10 J/cm2, demonstrate a single mode guiding region in the center of the induced modification under longitudinal focusing conditions. Local changes to the both the glass structure and the guiding properties inside the laser-irradiated area are investigated through the use of scanning Raman and fluorescence microscopy.

2. Experiment

In this study we have induced modifications in several different metaphosphate ([O]/[P] = 3.0) and polyphosphate (3.0 < [O]/[P] ≤ 3.5) glasses. Binary zinc phosphate glasses with nominal ZnO contents between 50 and 65 mol% were prepared using reagent grade ZnO (zinc oxide), and NH4H2PO4 (ammonium phosphate). A zinc aluminophopshate glass with a nominal metaphosphate composition (30ZnO-10Al2O3-60P2O5) was prepared from a mixture of ZnO, crystalline Al(PO3)3 and NH4H2PO4. In each batch, raw materials were thoroughly mixed and calcined at 500°C for 12 hours. The glasses were first melted in alumina crucibles at 1000°C for two hours and then rapidly quenched to form glass frit. The fritted glass was ground in a mortar and pestle and the powders were remelted in a Pt crucible for one hour at 1050°C to form a homogeneous melt. The melts were poured into steel molds, cooled and then annealed for 2 hours near Tg. Annealed samples were polished using SiC paper and diamond pastes to a finish of 0.25 microns.

In each polished glass sample, a series of waveguides was fabricated using a regeneratively amplified Ti:sapphire 1 kHz, 180 fs laser system (Merlin-Spitfire Spectra Physics) with pulse energies ranging from 0.2 μJ – 4 μJ. The femtosecond laser beam was directed through a 20x (0.40 NA) microscope and the glass sample was translated parallel to the femtosecond laser beam at a constant scan speed of 50 μm/s. Near field and far field waveguide profiles, as well as white light images and insertion losses were measured after waveguides were written. White light images of the modified areas were collected both perpendicular to, and normal to, the fs-laser beam propagation direction using a 20x (0.40 NA) objective and a CCD camera. A 10x (0.21 NA) objective was used to focus 660 nm laser light into the input waveguide facet, and a 10x (0.20 NA) objective was focused at the output facet in order to characterize the guiding properties. Mode profiles of the transmitted 660 nm laser light were obtained by imaging the near-field intensity at the output facet of the waveguide using a CCD camera. Positive refractive index changes were calculated by measuring the numerical aperture of the waveguide.

Confocal Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy was performed on the fs-laser induced modifications using a 473 nm cw laser (Laserglow.com Limited LRS-473). The 473 nm excitation beam was directed through a 50x (0.55 NA) objective using a 50/50 broadband dielectric beam splitter and focused into the glass sample, which was placed on a Newport 3-axis xyz motorized stage. Backscatter signals produced by the 473 nm laser excitation were collected by the same 50x objective and directed through the 50/50 beam splitter. A 50 μm diameter pinhole was used to ensure Raman signals were only collected from the focal volume of the objective. An Oriel 500 spectrometer in conjunction with a CCD camera (LN-CCD Princeton Instruments) was used to collect spectral signals that passed through the pinhole setup. The spectrometer was used with a 1200 grooves/mm grating to collect Raman signals, and a 600 grooves/mm grating to collect fluorescence signals.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Physical changes to fs-laser modified zinc phosphate glass

Figure 1(a)
Fig. 1 Microscope images of fs-modified zinc phosphate glass written with fs-laser fluences of 8 J/cm2 (1) 30ZnO-10Al2O3-60P2O5 glass (2) 50ZnO-50P2O5 glass (3) 55ZnO-45P2O5 glass (4) 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass (5) 65ZnO-35P2O5; (a) white light images of the modification along the waveguide direction (b) Transmission white light images of the modification cross section (c) 660 nm transmission near field images (d) Waveguide near field output guiding profile for 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass (e) Waveguide far field output profile for 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass.
and 1(b) show white light microscope images of waveguides created by the femtosecond laser direct-write technique applied to the five different zinc phosphate glasses. Figure 1(c) shows the near field images from waveguiding experiments in the respective glasses. These microscopic images and waveguiding experiments showed significant differences in the responses of the five phosphate glasses to the femtosecond laser. For example, the waveguiding experiments on the laser-modified zinc phosphate glasses usually demonstrated negative changes in the index of refraction inside the fs-laser irradiated region, resulting in poor guiding characteristics (Fig. 1(c)). The exception was the 60ZnO-40P2O5 polyphosphate sample (Fig. 1 (4c)
Fig. 4 (Color online) (a) Fluorescence spectra of modified and unmodified 30ZnO-10Al2O3-60P2O5 glass for various fs-laser fluences (b) Maximum change in intensity of POHC fluorescence as a function of the maximum 1209 cm−1 Raman mode shift for various glass compositions modified with a fs-laser fluence of 43 J/cm2.
) where a positive change in the refractive index within the focal volume was found. Transverse microscope images of the modified regions showed visible damage to many of the glasses after irradiation, (Fig. 1 (1a)1 (3a)
Fig. 3 (Color online) (a) Spectral profile of the 1209 cm−1 Raman mode of modified and unmodified 30ZnO-10Al2O3-60P2O5 glass for various fs-laser fluences (b) Color map of shifts in the relative spectral position of the 1209 cm−1 Raman peak as a function of the spatial position for 30ZnO-10Al2O3-60P2O5 glass modified with a fs-laser fluence of 43 J/cm2.
), even for comparatively low fs-laser pulse fluences (below 10 J/cm2). However, the 60ZnO-40P2O5 and 65ZnO-35P2O5 polyphosphate glasses did not exhibit this same behavior. The 65ZnO-35P2O5 polyphosphate glass sample demonstrated relatively smooth modification to the glass for low fs-laser fluences in comparison to many of the other glass samples (Fig. 1(5a)). The observed refractive index changes, however, were not optimal for waveguiding (Fig. 1(5b)). In contrast, the 60ZnO-40P2O5 polyphosphate glass yielded good waveguiding characteristics and smooth modification for the same low energy fs-laser writing parameters (Fig. 1 (4a) and 1 (4c)). The obvious differences in response to fs-laser exposure of the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass compared to that of the other zinc phosphate glass compositions, indicate an important role for the initial phosphate glass composition (or structure) in the development of high quality waveguides.

Detailed analysis of the near field and far field waveguide output profiles, for the modified 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass, showed single mode guiding characteristics using 660 nm laser light (Fig. 1(d), Fig. 1(e)), with a maximum measured Δn of 5x10−4 and a total overall insertion loss of 6.69 dB (with an estimated coupling loss of 2 dB), over a waveguide length of 3 mm. The high losses measured in this experiment are most likely caused by observed inhomogeneities in the bulk glass sample that were present before fs-laser waveguide writing. Such inhomogeneities can have a detrimental effect on the light propagation inside the waveguide as well as on the overall manufacturing precision of the waveguides due to deviations in the fs-laser focusing conditions. Positive refractive index changes inside the focal volume were observed for fs-laser fluences between 2 J/cm2 (threshold for modification) and 10 J/cm2. For fs-laser fluences above 10 J/cm2, the irradiated region exhibited visible material damage and inhomogeneous changes for all the glasses used in this study, including the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass.

3.2. Confocal Raman and fluorescence microscopy

In order to understand the atomic scale changes to the initial glass structure, confocal Raman and fluorescence experiments were performed on all fs-laser modified zinc phosphate glass samples. The results demonstrated systematic changes in the Raman spectra of the modified glass. In the modified regions of glasses where no favorable waveguiding structures could be produced, the 1209 cm−1 Raman peak associated with P-O bonds on Q2 tetrahedra showed a consistent shift to lower wavenumbers (Fig. 3(a)). We measured the shift by carefully scanning over the modified cross section in 1.5 μm step sizes and recording the maximum shift, relative to the bulk material, that typically occurred at the very center of the modified area (Fig. 3(b)). The magnitude of the maximum shift of the modified zinc phosphate glass not only varied from sample to sample (Fig. 4(b) below), but it also depended on the amount of fs-laser energy deposited into the glass (Fig. 3(a)).

For the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass, however, no measurable shift of the (PO2)sym Raman peak was observed within the modified area for any fs-laser fluences used. This indicates that the structure of this glass has not been altered in the same way as those with lower ZnO contents, consistent with the increase in refractive index and positive waveguiding performance. The peak at 1209cm−1 could not be distinguished in the Raman spectrum of the 65ZnO-35P2O5 glass which has relatively few Q2 tetrahedra (about 15%) [21

21. R. K. Brow, D. R. Tallant, S. T. Myers, and C. C. Phifer, “The short-range structure of zinc polyphosphate glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 191(1-2), 45–55 (1995). [CrossRef]

], thus making it more difficult to characterize in the same manner as the other glass samples used in this experiment.

In addition to Raman spectroscopy we have also measured the fluorescence spectra of fs-laser modified zinc phosphate glass. At wavelengths beyond 535 nm, a very broad and noticeable photoluminescence peak centered at 630 nm was observed (Fig. 4(a)) within the modified volume of phosphate glasses with [O]/[P] < 3.25. This fluorescence peak has been attributed to the presence of fs-laser induced POHC (phosphorus-oxygen-hole-center) defects. This fluorescence is typically indicative of a damage of the phosphate network as a result of laser irradiation [26

26. J. W. Chan, T. Huser, J. S. Hayden, S. H. Risbud, and D. M. Krol, “Fluorescence spectroscopy of color centers generated in phosphate glasses after exposure to femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85(5), 1037–1040 (2002). [CrossRef]

].

The overall fluorescence intensity, and thus concentration of the induced POHC defects, also depends on the initial glass composition. Figure 4(b) shows that glasses with greater fluorescence intensities from laser modified regions possess greater shifts in the (PO2)sym Raman peak frequency. This relationship indicates that the mechanism of glass network expansion caused by the absorption of fs-laser pulses results in broken P-O bonds and a lower glass density. It also shows the distinctly different response of the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass to the fs-laser, compared to glasses with lower [O]/[P] ratios. No significant POHC fluorescence or significant Raman shift was measured from the 60ZnO-40P2O5 polyphosphate glass composition, even under high energy writing conditions where 43 J/cm2 fs-laser fluence was used. The measured relationship at the molecular level is consistent with the observed behavior at the microscopic scale where lower refractive index changes to the glass persisted for all but the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass composition (Fig. 1(c)). However, it is worth noting that the results for the 65ZnO-35P2O5 are not conclusive; in fact, no significant Raman changes or POHC fluorescence signals have been observed within the modified region of this phosphate glass composition. While the modified glass morphology suggests that the changes in the refractive index are negative, such an observation is only qualitative. Thus, it is possible that the induced index change is positive, albeit a low positive change that demonstrates poor waveguiding characteristics.

Micro-Raman measurements specifically performed on the waveguides in the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass sample did not exhibit any measurable positive shifts in the 1209 cm−1 Raman peak that would indicate a contraction of the phosphate network. Other refractive index mechanisms, such as changes in the network polarizability by an increased proportion of Q1 tetrahedra, previously reported in Yb doped phosphate glass by Little et al. [27

27. D. J. Little, M. Ams, P. Dekker, G. D. Marshall, and M. J. Withford, “Mechanism of femtosecond-laser induced refractive index change in phosphate glass under a low repetition-rate regime,” J. Appl. Phys. 108(3), 033110 (2010). [CrossRef]

], were not observed in our analysis. It is possible that changes may result from photo-induced stresses that may not affect the Raman peak positions [15

15. L. B. Fletcher, J. J. Witcher, W. B. Reichman, A. Arai, J. Bovatsek, and D. M. Krol, “Changes to the network structure of Er–Yb doped phosphate glass induced by femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Appl. Phys. 106(8), 083107 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. While the mechanism responsible for an increase in refractive index remains the subject of further study, it is clear that for most phosphate glass compositions studied in this experiment, a decrease in refractive index caused by an expansion of the network is the dominant response mechanism.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we have demonstrated that direct femtosecond laser irradiation of zinc polyphosphate glass with an oxygen to phosphorus ratio of 3.25 (60ZnO-40P2O5 glass) produces a positive refractive index change, as much as 5x10−4, that can be used to fabricate optical waveguides. Such waveguides have been created under longitudinal focusing geometries using a 1 kHz, 180 fs laser system with laser pulse fluences above the measured modification threshold of 2 J/cm2 and below the observed glass damage threshold of 10 J/cm2. The positive refractive index changes reported are symmetric and confined to within the focal volume of the 20x (0.40 NA) fs-laser writing objective.

We have observed that femtosecond laser waveguide writing in phosphate glass highly depends on the initial glass composition. It is a very important variable that cannot be overlooked when fabricating high quality optical waveguides inside phosphate glasses. The changes to the network structure can be measured using confocal fluorescence and Raman microscopy. Most phosphate glass compositions have molecular-level structures that expand under the femtosecond laser and produce POHC defects, making them less practical for laser-written waveguides. However, the 60ZnO-40P2O5 glass has a structure that appears to modify in a way that produces a positive refractive index change, and that does not generate POHC defects under the femtosecond laser irradiation, making this glass an attractive material for waveguiding applications.

References and Links

1.

D. Du, X. Liu, G. Korn, J. Squier, and G. Mourou, “Laser-induced breakdown by impact ionization in Si02 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(23), 3071–3073 (1994). [CrossRef]

2.

B. C. Stuart, M. D. Feit, S. Herman, A. M. Rubenchik, B. W. Shore, and M. D. Perry, “Nanosecond-to-femtosecond laser-induced breakdown in dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 53(4), 1749–1761 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, and K. Hirao, “Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser,” Opt. Lett. 21(21), 1729–1731 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

E. N. Glezer and E. Mazur, “Ultrafast-laser driven micro-explosions in transparent materials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(7), 882–884 (1997). [CrossRef]

5.

K. Miura, J. Qiu, H. Inouye, T. Mitsuyu, and K. Hirao, “Photowritten optical waveguides in various glasses with ultrashort pulse laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(23), 3329–3331 (1997). [CrossRef]

6.

K. Itoh, W. Watanabe, S. Nolte, and C. Schaffer, “Ultrafast processes for bulk modification of transparent materials,” MRS Bull. 31(08), 620–625 (2006). [CrossRef]

7.

R. R. Gattass and E. Mazur, “Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials,” Nat. Photonics 2(4), 219–225 (2008). [CrossRef]

8.

M. J. Weber, “Science and technology of laser glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 123(1-3), 208–222 (1990). [CrossRef]

9.

R. Osellame, S. Taccheo, G. Cerullo, M. Marangoni, D. Polli, R. Ramponi, P. Laporta, and S. De Silvestri, “Optical gain in Er-Yb doped waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Electron. Lett. 38(17), 964–965 (2002). [CrossRef]

10.

S. Taccheo, G. Della Valle, R. Osellame, G. Cerullo, N. Chiodo, P. Laporta, O. Svelto, A. Killi, U. Morgner, M. Lederer, and D. Kopf, “Er:Yb-doped waveguide laser fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Lett. 29(22), 2626–2628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

V. R. Bhardwaj, E. Simova, P. B. Corkum, D. M. Rayner, C. Hnatovsky, R. S. Taylor, B. Schreder, M. Kluge, and J. Zimmer, “Femtosecond laser-induced refractive index modification in multicomponent glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 97(8), 083102 (2005). [CrossRef]

12.

J. W. Chan, T. R. Huser, S. H. Risbud, J. S. Hayden, and D. M. Krol, “Waveguide fabrication in phosphate glasses using femtosecond laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(15), 2371–2373 (2003). [CrossRef]

13.

M. Ams, G. D. Marshall, P. Dekker, M. Dubov, V. K. Mezentsev, I. Bennion, and M. J. Withford, “Investigation of ultrafast laser–photonic material interactions: challenges for directly written glass photonics,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(5), 1370–1381 (2008). [CrossRef]

14.

D. Esser, D. Mahlmann, D. Wortmann, and J. Gottmann, “Interference microscopy of femtosecond laser written waveguides in phosphate glass,” Appl. Phys. B 96(2-3), 453–457 (2009). [CrossRef]

15.

L. B. Fletcher, J. J. Witcher, W. B. Reichman, A. Arai, J. Bovatsek, and D. M. Krol, “Changes to the network structure of Er–Yb doped phosphate glass induced by femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Appl. Phys. 106(8), 083107 (2009). [CrossRef]

16.

R. Osellame, N. Chiodo, G. Della Valle, G. Cerullo, R. Ramponi, P. Laporta, A. Killi, U. Morgner, and O. Svelto, “Waveguide lasers in the C-band fabricated by laser inscription with a compact femtosecond oscillator,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12(2), 277–285 (2006). [CrossRef]

17.

R. Osellame, N. Chiodo, G. della Valle, S. Taccheo, R. Ramponi, G. Cerullo, A. Killi, U. Morgner, M. Lederer, and D. Kopf, “Optical waveguide writing with a diode-pumped femtosecond oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 29(16), 1900–1902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

G. Della Valle, R. Osellame, and P. Laporta, “Micromachining of photonic devices by femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 11(1), 013001 (2009). [CrossRef]

19.

A. Ferrer, A. Ruiz de la Cruz, D. Puerto, W. Gawelda, J. A. Vallés, M. A. Rebolledo, V. Berdejo, J. Siegel, and J. Solis, “In situ assessment and minimization of nonlinear propagation effects for femtosecond-laser waveguide writing in dielectrics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(8), 1688–1692 (2010). [CrossRef]

20.

R. K. Brow, “Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 263–264,1–28 (2000). [CrossRef]

21.

R. K. Brow, D. R. Tallant, S. T. Myers, and C. C. Phifer, “The short-range structure of zinc polyphosphate glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 191(1-2), 45–55 (1995). [CrossRef]

22.

R. K. Brow, “Nature of alumina in phosphate glass: I, properties of sodium aluminophosphate glass,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(4), 913 (1993). [CrossRef]

23.

R. K. Brow, J. Kirkpatrick, and G. Turner, “Nature of alumina in phosphate glass: II, Structure of sodium aluminophosphate glass,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(4), 1919 (1993).

24.

J. T. Krause and C. R. Kurkjian, “Vibrational anomalies in inorganic glass formers,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51(4), 226–227 (1968). [CrossRef]

25.

L. Popović, D. de Waal, and J. C. A. Boeyens, “Correlation between Raman wavenumbers and P—O bond lengths in crystalline inorganic phosphates,” J. Raman Spectrosc. 36, 2–11 (2005). [CrossRef]

26.

J. W. Chan, T. Huser, J. S. Hayden, S. H. Risbud, and D. M. Krol, “Fluorescence spectroscopy of color centers generated in phosphate glasses after exposure to femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85(5), 1037–1040 (2002). [CrossRef]

27.

D. J. Little, M. Ams, P. Dekker, G. D. Marshall, and M. J. Withford, “Mechanism of femtosecond-laser induced refractive index change in phosphate glass under a low repetition-rate regime,” J. Appl. Phys. 108(3), 033110 (2010). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.2750) Materials : Glass and other amorphous materials
(220.4000) Optical design and fabrication : Microstructure fabrication
(230.7370) Optical devices : Waveguides
(320.2250) Ultrafast optics : Femtosecond phenomena

ToC Category:
Laser Microfabrication

History
Original Manuscript: January 24, 2011
Revised Manuscript: February 21, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: February 22, 2011
Published: April 11, 2011

Citation
Luke B. Fletcher, Jon J. Witcher, Neil Troy, Signo T. Reis, Richard K. Brow, and Denise M. Krol, "Direct femtosecond laser waveguide writing inside zinc phosphate glass," Opt. Express 19, 7929-7936 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-9-7929


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Du, X. Liu, G. Korn, J. Squier, and G. Mourou, “Laser-induced breakdown by impact ionization in Si02 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(23), 3071–3073 (1994). [CrossRef]
  2. B. C. Stuart, M. D. Feit, S. Herman, A. M. Rubenchik, B. W. Shore, and M. D. Perry, “Nanosecond-to-femtosecond laser-induced breakdown in dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 53(4), 1749–1761 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, and K. Hirao, “Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser,” Opt. Lett. 21(21), 1729–1731 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. E. N. Glezer and E. Mazur, “Ultrafast-laser driven micro-explosions in transparent materials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(7), 882–884 (1997). [CrossRef]
  5. K. Miura, J. Qiu, H. Inouye, T. Mitsuyu, and K. Hirao, “Photowritten optical waveguides in various glasses with ultrashort pulse laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(23), 3329–3331 (1997). [CrossRef]
  6. K. Itoh, W. Watanabe, S. Nolte, and C. Schaffer, “Ultrafast processes for bulk modification of transparent materials,” MRS Bull. 31(08), 620–625 (2006). [CrossRef]
  7. R. R. Gattass and E. Mazur, “Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials,” Nat. Photonics 2(4), 219–225 (2008). [CrossRef]
  8. M. J. Weber, “Science and technology of laser glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 123(1-3), 208–222 (1990). [CrossRef]
  9. R. Osellame, S. Taccheo, G. Cerullo, M. Marangoni, D. Polli, R. Ramponi, P. Laporta, and S. De Silvestri, “Optical gain in Er-Yb doped waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Electron. Lett. 38(17), 964–965 (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Taccheo, G. Della Valle, R. Osellame, G. Cerullo, N. Chiodo, P. Laporta, O. Svelto, A. Killi, U. Morgner, M. Lederer, and D. Kopf, “Er:Yb-doped waveguide laser fabricated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Lett. 29(22), 2626–2628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. V. R. Bhardwaj, E. Simova, P. B. Corkum, D. M. Rayner, C. Hnatovsky, R. S. Taylor, B. Schreder, M. Kluge, and J. Zimmer, “Femtosecond laser-induced refractive index modification in multicomponent glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 97(8), 083102 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. J. W. Chan, T. R. Huser, S. H. Risbud, J. S. Hayden, and D. M. Krol, “Waveguide fabrication in phosphate glasses using femtosecond laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(15), 2371–2373 (2003). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Ams, G. D. Marshall, P. Dekker, M. Dubov, V. K. Mezentsev, I. Bennion, and M. J. Withford, “Investigation of ultrafast laser–photonic material interactions: challenges for directly written glass photonics,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(5), 1370–1381 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. D. Esser, D. Mahlmann, D. Wortmann, and J. Gottmann, “Interference microscopy of femtosecond laser written waveguides in phosphate glass,” Appl. Phys. B 96(2-3), 453–457 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. L. B. Fletcher, J. J. Witcher, W. B. Reichman, A. Arai, J. Bovatsek, and D. M. Krol, “Changes to the network structure of Er–Yb doped phosphate glass induced by femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Appl. Phys. 106(8), 083107 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. R. Osellame, N. Chiodo, G. Della Valle, G. Cerullo, R. Ramponi, P. Laporta, A. Killi, U. Morgner, and O. Svelto, “Waveguide lasers in the C-band fabricated by laser inscription with a compact femtosecond oscillator,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12(2), 277–285 (2006). [CrossRef]
  17. R. Osellame, N. Chiodo, G. della Valle, S. Taccheo, R. Ramponi, G. Cerullo, A. Killi, U. Morgner, M. Lederer, and D. Kopf, “Optical waveguide writing with a diode-pumped femtosecond oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 29(16), 1900–1902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. G. Della Valle, R. Osellame, and P. Laporta, “Micromachining of photonic devices by femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 11(1), 013001 (2009). [CrossRef]
  19. A. Ferrer, A. Ruiz de la Cruz, D. Puerto, W. Gawelda, J. A. Vallés, M. A. Rebolledo, V. Berdejo, J. Siegel, and J. Solis, “In situ assessment and minimization of nonlinear propagation effects for femtosecond-laser waveguide writing in dielectrics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(8), 1688–1692 (2010). [CrossRef]
  20. R. K. Brow, “Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 263–264,1–28 (2000). [CrossRef]
  21. R. K. Brow, D. R. Tallant, S. T. Myers, and C. C. Phifer, “The short-range structure of zinc polyphosphate glass,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 191(1-2), 45–55 (1995). [CrossRef]
  22. R. K. Brow, “Nature of alumina in phosphate glass: I, properties of sodium aluminophosphate glass,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(4), 913 (1993). [CrossRef]
  23. R. K. Brow, J. Kirkpatrick, and G. Turner, “Nature of alumina in phosphate glass: II, Structure of sodium aluminophosphate glass,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(4), 1919 (1993).
  24. J. T. Krause and C. R. Kurkjian, “Vibrational anomalies in inorganic glass formers,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51(4), 226–227 (1968). [CrossRef]
  25. L. Popović, D. de Waal, and J. C. A. Boeyens, “Correlation between Raman wavenumbers and P—O bond lengths in crystalline inorganic phosphates,” J. Raman Spectrosc. 36, 2–11 (2005). [CrossRef]
  26. J. W. Chan, T. Huser, J. S. Hayden, S. H. Risbud, and D. M. Krol, “Fluorescence spectroscopy of color centers generated in phosphate glasses after exposure to femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85(5), 1037–1040 (2002). [CrossRef]
  27. D. J. Little, M. Ams, P. Dekker, G. D. Marshall, and M. J. Withford, “Mechanism of femtosecond-laser induced refractive index change in phosphate glass under a low repetition-rate regime,” J. Appl. Phys. 108(3), 033110 (2010). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 4 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 2
 

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited