OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 20, Iss. 14 — Jul. 2, 2012
  • pp: 15326–15335

Optics InfoBase > Optics Express > Volume 20 > Issue 14 > Page 15326

« Show journal navigation

Plasmon switching: Observation of dynamic surface plasmon steering by selective mode excitation in a sub-wavelength slit

S. B. Raghunathan, C. H. Gan, T. van Dijk, B. Ea Kim, H. F. Schouten, W. Ubachs, P. Lalanne, and T. D. Visser  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 14, pp. 15326-15335 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.015326


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1269 KB)


Advanced Search

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We report a plasmon steering method that enables us to dynamically control the direction of surface plasmons generated by a two-mode slit in a thin metal film. By varying the phase between different coherent beams that are incident on the slit, individual waveguide modes are excited. Different linear combinations of the two modes lead to different diffracted fields at the exit of the slit. As a result, the direction in which surface plasmons are launched can be controlled. Experiments confirm that it is possible to distribute an approximately constant surface plasmon intensity in any desired proportion over the two launching directions. We also find that the anti-symmetric mode generates surface plasmons more efficiently than the fundamental symmetric mode.

© 2012 OSA

1. Introduction

An electromagnetic field directed at the interface between a metal and a dielectric can cause the free electrons in the metal to oscillate at the same frequency as the field. Under the right conditions such a collective excitation of electrons, known as a surface plasmon (SP), will propagate along the interface, and can be converted back into a freely propagating field when it is scattered by a surface imperfection such as a ridge or a groove [1

H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

]. The wavelength of an SP is much smaller than the wavelength of the electromagnetic field by which it is generated. This suggests the possibility of ultra-compact “plasmonic” devices in which information-carrying electromagnetic fields generate SPs that are then processed before being turned back again into a free field [2

H. A. Atwater, “The promise of plasmonics,” Scientific American 296, 56–62 (2007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Following the observation of plasmon-enhanced transmission through subwavelength-size hole arrays [3

T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff, “Extraordinary optical transmission through subwavelength hole arrays,” Nature (London) 391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]

] and single subwavelength apertures [4

T. Thio, K. M. Pellerin, R. A. Linke, H. J. Lezec, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Enhanced light transmission through a single subwavelength aperture,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1972–1974 (2001). [CrossRef]

] in metal plates, numerous research efforts to develop nanoscale plasmonic devices were triggered. Plasmonic couplers [5

B. Steinberger, A. Hohenau, H. Ditlbacher, F. R. Aussenegg, A. Leitner, and J. R. Krenn, “Dielectric stripes on gold as surface plasmon waveguides: Bends and directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 081111 (2007). [CrossRef]

], waveguides [6

S. A. Maier, P. G. Kik, H. A. Atwater, S. Meltzer, E. Harel, B. E. Koel, and A. A. G. Requicha, “Local detection of electromagnetic energy transport below the diffraction limit in metal nanoparticle plasmon waveguides,” Nature Materials 2, 229–232 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], interferometers [7

Q. Gan, Y. Gao, and F. J. Bartoli, “Vertical plasmonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer for sensitive optical sensing,” Opt. Express 17, 20747–20755 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], lasers [8

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature (London) 460, 1110–1113 (2009). [CrossRef]

] and dichroic splitters [9

J.S.Q. Liu, R.A. Pala, F. Afshinmanesh, W. Cai, and M.L. Brongersma, “A submicron plasmonic dichroic splitter,” Nat. Commun. 2:525 [CrossRef] (2011). [PubMed]

] have already been realized. However, for the field of plasmonics to achieve its full potential, it is necessary to control the direction in which SPs are launched. Compact schemes for directional launching of SPs based on geometries such as a nanoslit with a Bragg resonator [10

F. López-Tejeira, S. G. Rodrigo, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, J. R. Krenn, I. P. Radko, M. U. González, J. C. Weeber, and A. Dereux, “Efficient unidirectional nanoslit couplers for surface plasmons,” Nat. Phys. 3, 324–328 (2007). [CrossRef]

], an asymmetrically illuminated single nanoslit [11

Y. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Tang, K. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Song, T. Wei, and C. H. Wang, “A tunable unidirectional surface plasmon polaritons source,” Opt. Express 17, 20457–20464 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and pairs of nanoslits [12

X. Li, Q. Tan, B. Bai, and G. Jin, “Experimental demonstration of tunable directional excitation of surface plasmon polaritons with a subwavelength metallic double slit,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 251109 (2011). [CrossRef]

], and an optimized multi-groove coupler [13

A. Baron, E. Devaux, J. C. Rodier, J. P. Hugonin, E. Rousseau, C. Genet, T. Ebbesen, and P. Lalanne, “Compact antenna for efficient and unidirectional launching and decoupling of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett. 11, 4207–4212 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] have been proposed and implemented, with extinction ratios as high as 50. These schemes all rely on some static, built-in asymmetry that favors a particular direction of SP launching. To address the important aspect of flexible directional launching of SPs, an essential feature for any kind of integrated plasmonic circuitry, we present a generic approach to dynamically switch plasmons between two channels with a constant total intensity and with a nanoscale footprint.

2. Theory

In its simplest form, our approach is depicted in Fig. 1(a), where a narrow slit in a thin gold film is illuminated from the glass substrate by three coherent beams with Transverse Magnetic (TM) polarization. The slit width is such that for an illumination wavelength λ only two TM modes–one symmetric (TM0), the other anti-symmetric (TM1)–are non-evanescent. Beam B is normally incident and therefore only excites the fundamental TM0 mode. In the path of this beam a piezo element is mounted, allowing its phase to be varied. Beams A and −A, which have opposite but equal amplitudes, make an angle of +θ and −θ with B, respectively. They have the same intensity, but are π–phase shifted with respect to each other. It follows from symmetry that the combination of these two oblique beams excites only the TM1 mode [14

M. Miyata and J. Takahara, “Excitation control of long-range surface plasmons by two incident beams,” Opt. Express 20, 9493–9500 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. At the slit exit, both left and right travelling surface plasmons are generated. Their amplitudes are denoted by β(l) and β(r), respectively. A series of grooves on either side of the slit is used to evidence the steering effect by converting the launched plasmons back to freely propagating fields whose intensity is measured in the far field.

Fig. 1 Principle of the proposed surface plasmon steering method. (a) A subwavelength slit of width w in a gold film supports only two TM modes for λ/2 ≲ w ≲ λ: a symmetric mode (s, green curve) and an anti-symmetric mode (a, blue curve). Three coherent beams, A, −A (with opposite angle of incidence compared to A and π-phase shifted), and B are incident on the slit from the glass substrate. At the dark side of the film, SPs are launched to the left and to the right with amplitude β(l) and β(r), respectively. A series of grooves at 8 μm from either side of the slit converts the SPs back to freely propagating fields that are detected in the far field. (b) Illustrating how a coherent superposition of the a and s modes can lead to unidirectional SP launching at a gold-air interface. The first two panels show the intensity of the magnetic field when the slit is illuminated with either the s or the a mode. Superposed dotted blue curves show the total magnetic field scattered on the interface. The length of the white bar in the first panel indicates the illumination wavelength in vacuum (λ= 600 nm), and the slit width w is λ/2.

To illustrate how plasmon beam steering may be achieved with a two-mode nanoslit, Fig. 1(b) shows the interference pattern generated by an appropriate linear combination of the TM0 and TM1 modes in the slit. These modes scatter at the slit exit and a complete extinction of SPs in one launching direction is predicted. The fields are calculated with a frequency-domain, aperiodic Fourier modal method, incorporating perfectly-matched layers (method MM3 in the benchmark article Ref. [15

M. Besbes, J. P. Hugonin, P. Lalanne, S. van Haver, O. T. A. Janssen, A. M. Nugrowati, M. Xu, S. F. Pereira, H.P. Urbach, A. S. van de Nes, P. Bienstman, G. Granet, A. Moreau, S. Helfert, M. Sukharev, T. Seideman, F. I. Baida, B. Guizal, and D. Van Labeke, “Numerical analysis of a slit-groove diffraction problem,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. 2, 07022 (2007). [CrossRef]

]). The distributions of the magnetic field intensity |H|2 in the near field of the metal-air interface are first shown for the cases where the same slit is illuminated with either the symmetric TM0 or the anti-symmetric TM1 mode. To illustrate the phase relationship between the excited SP fields, the total magnetic field Re(H) on the gold-air interface is superimposed as a dotted red curve. On each side, the oscillating wave is composed of an SP mode, and a quasi-cylindrical wave that rapidly decays within a few-wavelengths from the slit [16

P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, H. Liu, and B. Wang, “A microscopic view of the electromagnetic properties of sub-λ metallic surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 453–469 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. For illumination with either the TM0 or the TM1 mode, the fields on opposite sides of the slit are in phase or π–phase shifted, respectively. Let us adjust the (complex) amplitude of the TM0 mode such that it excites SPs on the right side of the slit with the same phase and intensity as the TM1 mode. It is apparent that the linear combination of the two modes (Fig. 1(b), right panel) then gives rise to complete destructive interference on the left side of the slit whereas constructive interference takes place on the right side. In the specific example of Fig. 1(b) it is taken that λ = 600 nm, w = λ/2, and the refractive index of gold nAu = 0.23 + i2.98 (see Ref. [17

E. D. Palik (ed.), Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).

]). The right-most panel of Fig. 1(b) clearly shows that the total field at the gold-air interface is almost null to the left of the slit, indicating that not only the SP excitation is zero, but also that the excitation of the accompanying quasi-cylindrical waves is very weak.

As explained, beams A and −A together excite only the TM1 mode whereas beam B excites only the TM0 mode. At the slit exit, each mode can be scattered into radiation that propagates to the far field, or can be dissipated as absorption loss on the gold surface, or be reflected as a backward propagating mode in the slit. Part of the absorption loss is carried by the SPs launched on both sides of the slit. Let the SP scattering coefficients at the left- and right-hand side of the slit for the two-beam system {A, −A} be Aa and −Aa, respectively. For beam B we denote the SP scattering coefficient on each side by Bs. To calculate these coefficients, we use the mode orthogonality of translational-invariant lossy waveguides [16

P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, H. Liu, and B. Wang, “A microscopic view of the electromagnetic properties of sub-λ metallic surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 453–469 (2009). [CrossRef]

], which yields Aa= ∫ −∞∞ [ Ez (a) ( x,z) H SP ( x,z)− H (a) ( x,z) Ez SP ( x,z)]dz, and Bs= ∫ −∞∞ [ Ez (s) ( x,z) H SP ( x,z)− H (s) ( x,z) Ez SP ( x,z)]dz, where the field components [ H SP ( x,z), Ez SP ( x,z)], corresponding to an SP propagating in the negative x-direction with a unit power-flow at x = 0, are calculated analytically [1

H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

]. Also, [ H (a) ( x,z), Ez (a) ( x,z)] and [ H (s) ( x,z), Ez (s) ( x,z)] are the scattered field components of the combined incident field of beams A and −A, and of the incident beam B alone, respectively. Note that the integral over z is independent of x, provided that x corresponds to an abscissa on the right side of the slit (see details in Ref. [16

P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, H. Liu, and B. Wang, “A microscopic view of the electromagnetic properties of sub-λ metallic surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 453–469 (2009). [CrossRef]

]).

We define
σs=2 | Bs|2,
(1)
which has a dimension of length for our two-dimensional case and can be seen as a SP cross-section [18

H. Liu, P. Lalanne, X. Yang, and J. P. Hugonin “Surface plasmon generation by subwavelength isolated objects,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14, 1522–1529 (2008). [CrossRef]

,19

L. Verslegers, Z. Yu, P. B. Catrysse, and S. Fan, “Temporal coupled-mode theory for resonant apertures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1947–1956 (2010). [CrossRef]

], by analogy with the scattering or extinction cross-sections defined for nanoparticles [20

C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).

]. The factor 2 takes into account the SPs launched on both sides of the slit. The anti-symmetric case corresponds to a spatially non-uniform illumination of the slit. Usually scattering cross sections are defined for incident fields that do not vary at the scale of the scatterer. However, this Ansatz is not necessary, and in a consistent manner we may define an anti-symmetric SP cross section
σa=2 | Aa|2,
(2)
where the integral Aa is normalized such that the Poynting-vector modulus of each individual plane wave, A and −A, is one half. On spatial averaging over the fringe pattern formed by the interference of the two incident plane waves, the total energy transported by the two-beam combination is precisely equal to the energy transported by the single plane wave B in the symmetric case. Finally, note that an SP scattering cross-section greater than the geometrical cross section of the slit (w) implies that more energy is converted to SPs than is geometrically incident upon it.

Figure 2 summarizes the main results obtained for the cross-sections at λ = 632.8 nm and for a gold-film thickness of 200 nm. In Fig. 2(a) the influence of the slit width is shown. The calculation of σa is performed by assuming that the angle of incidence of the plane waves with amplitude A and −A is θ = 30°. Starting from w = 0, the SP cross section of the symmetric case (circles) increases gradually to a maximum value ∼ 60 nm at w ≈ 300 nm, and then decreases as the slit width is further increased. The overall behavior is consistent with earlier works on the ability of isolated slits or grooves to launch SPs [16

P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, H. Liu, and B. Wang, “A microscopic view of the electromagnetic properties of sub-λ metallic surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 453–469 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. More interesting is the anti-symmetric case (crosses) for which the slit is placed at an anti-node of the interference pattern formed by the two incident plane waves. For very small slit widths, the incident field on the slit is virtually null and the TM1 mode is weakly excited. In addition, since the TM1 mode is below cutoff, the energy transfer towards the upper slit aperture is inefficient, and it is only when this mode becomes propagating (for w ≈ 300 nm) that a rising behavior is observed. Then σa rapidly becomes significantly larger than σs. This remarkable result (note that the incident field is null at the slit center for the anti-symmetric case) attests to the great potential of the TM1 mode to deliver large and steady SP flows, a property that is rarely used in plasmonic devices [21

J. A. Schuller and M. L. Brongersma, “General properties of dielectric optical antennas,” Opt. Express 17, 24084–24095 (2009). [CrossRef]

] whose operation mostly rely on the fundamental TM0 mode and on tiny slits or grooves. [1

H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

–5

B. Steinberger, A. Hohenau, H. Ditlbacher, F. R. Aussenegg, A. Leitner, and J. R. Krenn, “Dielectric stripes on gold as surface plasmon waveguides: Bends and directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 081111 (2007). [CrossRef]

,9

J.S.Q. Liu, R.A. Pala, F. Afshinmanesh, W. Cai, and M.L. Brongersma, “A submicron plasmonic dichroic splitter,” Nat. Commun. 2:525 [CrossRef] (2011). [PubMed]

–13

A. Baron, E. Devaux, J. C. Rodier, J. P. Hugonin, E. Rousseau, C. Genet, T. Ebbesen, and P. Lalanne, “Compact antenna for efficient and unidirectional launching and decoupling of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett. 11, 4207–4212 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]

Fig. 2 The calculated SP cross sections σa and σs as defined in Eqs. (1) and (2) for a unit Poynting vector of each of the incident beams. (a) Variation of σa and σs with slit width w. The angles of incidence of the plane waves A, −A are taken to be θ = ±30°. The two insets indicate the setup for calculating σa and σs, respectively. (b) Variation of σa with angle of incidence θ for slit widths w = 300, 320, 350, and 450 nm. The refractive index of gold nAu = 0.18 + i2.99 for λ = 632.8 nm, is taken from Ref. [17

E. D. Palik (ed.), Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).

], and the thickness of the gold film is 200 nm.

Figure 2(b) shows the influence of the angle θ on the SP cross section σa. Starting from θ = 0 (a degenerate asymptotic case for which the incident field is null), the general trend is an increase of σa to a peak value for an intermediate angle of incidence, followed by a monotonic decrease to null for θ = 90°. This behavior depends only weakly on the slit width, although we note that as w increases, the angle for maximum SP excitation is gradually shifted to a less oblique angle of incidence, ranging from 46° > θ > 36° for the range of slit widths considered from 300 nm to 450 nm. For θ ≈ 20° and w = 450 nm as used in the experiment hereafter, σa = 100 nm, implying that 22% of the energy directly incident onto the slit is converted into SPs launched on the upper interface.

Turning our attention back to the plasmon switch (Fig. 1), it is clear that the SP amplitudes β(l) and β(r) of the left and right traveling surface plasmons may be represented as a linear combination of the SPs excited by the TM0 and the TM1 mode. It follows that β(l) and β(r) are given by the expressions
β (l)(δ)= Bs e iδ+ Aa,
(3a)
β (r)(δ)= Bs e iδ− Aa,
(3b)
where δ is a variable phase controlled by the voltage across the piezo element in the normally incident beam B. As will be seen shortly, the independent excitation of the two modes, together with the adjustable phase δ, allows us to control the direction in which the SPs are launched. By using variable grey filters or by varying the angle of incidence, it is possible to carefully tune the intensity of the beams to compensate for the difference between SP cross-sections σa and σs, and hence set |Bs| = |Aa|. In that case we have for the two SP intensities I(l)(δ) and I(r)(δ) the formulas
I (l)(δ)= | β (l)(δ)|2=2 | Bs|2 ( 1+cosδ),
(4a)
I (r)(δ)= | β (r)(δ)|2=2 | Bs|2 ( 1−cosδ).
(4b)
We note that a) the total plasmon intensity I(l)(δ)+I(r)(δ) = 4|Bs|2 is independent of the phase δ, and b) the ratio I(l)(δ)/I(r)(δ) ranges from zero to infinity when δ is varied. In other words, under precise coherent illumination, a single slit supporting two propagating modes allows one to dynamically distribute a fixed surface plasmon flow between left-going SPs and right-going SPs.

We note that for wider slits, that allow more than two TM modes, one could use the same scheme to obtain plasmon steering. In such a multi-mode slit the combination of beams A and −A only excites odd modes, whereas beam B excites only even modes. Cancellation of the combined odd modes by the combined even modes at one side of the slit can be achieved by balancing the amplitudes of the beams. The SPs are then launched from the other side of the slit. However, in a wider slit the conversion of incident light into SPs will be less efficient as more light is directly transmitted.

3. Experiment

Figure 3 shows the experimental setup with which the proposed steering of the SP intensities was realized. The linearly-polarized output of a 16 mW He-Ne laser operating at λ = 632.8 nm is first divided into three beams. Each beam is passed through a combination of quarter-wave plates and a linear polarizer such that the field at the sample is TM polarized. To ensure coherent mode excitation, the path difference between the arms was minimized by use of delay lines in arms B and A. Arm B is normally incident, whereas arms A and −A are obliquely incident in air at +30° and −30°, respectively. By mounting the last mirror in arm −A on a micrometer linear translator the two oblique arms are made to have a π phase difference with respect to each other. The last mirror in Arm B is mounted on top of a piezo element which is connected to a DC voltage source with a range of 0 – 300 V. The voltage across the piezo determines the phase δ of beam B. In a separate interference experiment with the same laser, the piezo voltage scale was calibrated in terms of phase, yielding that a 120 V ramp corresponds to a π–phase shift in δ.

Fig. 3 Sketch of the experimental setup. The sample is illuminated from the glass-substrate side.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the fabricated sample are shown in the insets of Fig. 4. Subwavelength slits with widths varying between 250 and 650 nm were etched by electron-beam lithography followed by ion-beam etching in a 200 nm thick gold layer evaporated onto a 0.5 mm thick fused-silica substrate. On either side of this “central slit”, at a distance of 8 μm, there is a set of 6 grooves with a 600 nm center-to-center spacing. Due to their tiny widths, only the central slits are etched all throughout the gold film, whereas the grooves are only partially engraved. To ease the alignment procedure, there is a reference slit located at a distance of around 25 μm to the left of each central slit. A 450 nm wide slit, which supports both the TM0 and TM1 modes, was used for the experimental results reported hereafter, but similar results have been obtained with other widths. The 8 μm slit-grooves separation helps suppress the amplitude of the quasi-cylindrical waves so that the grooves serve only to scatter the SPs. This ensures that the line trace pattern of the CCD camera in the far-field is effectively proportional to the intensity of the SPs and is not contaminated with additional direct-wave contributions [22

P. Lalanne and J. P. Hugonin, “Interaction between optical nano-objects at metallo-dielectric interfaces,” Nat. Phys. 2, 551–556, (2006). [CrossRef]

].

Fig. 4 Typical line trace of the CCD camera screen, perpendicular to the slits. The first low peak on the left (near pixel 70) is the signal from the indicator slit. The second and fourth peak are the intensities I(l)(δ) and I(r)(δ) from surface plasmons scattered by the left-hand grooves and right-hand grooves, respectively. The highest peak is the intensity transmitted by the central slit. The insets show sample details of the the central slit and the plasmon grooves made by a scanning electron microscope.

Experimental results for the 450 nm wide slit are shown in Fig. 5, where the intensities of the left- and right-travelling surface plasmons, I(l)(δ) and I(r)(δ) are plotted as a function of the voltage across the piezo element that regulates the phase δ of the normally incident beam. The agreement with Eq. (4) is very good. It is seen that more than 94% of the surface plasmons are launched to the left when the piezo voltage is 80 V, whereas for a voltage of 200 V about 92% is launched to the right. For intermediate voltage settings, arbitrary ratios of I(l)(δ)/I(r)(δ) can be obtained, which makes the device act as a variable beam splitter. The average total intensity I(l)(δ) + I(r)(δ) = 36.6 (dotted grey line). The attained visibility of 0.82 is limited by several factors, viz. a) the three beams not being spatially fully coherent due to the relatively low coherence length of the He-Ne laser, b) the amplitudes of arms A and −A being different by about 2 – 4%, and c) the amplitude |Bs| differing from |Aa| by about 2 – 5%. Notice however, that the sum of the two SP intensities is rather constant, with a mean value of 36.6 and a relative standard deviation less than 7% over the entire voltage sweep. Also the peak to minimum distance of 120 V is in excellent agreement with the independently observed π change in the phase δ of arm B. Additionally, by performing far-field measurements of the intensity radiated by the slit, we have observed a “lighthouse effect”, i.e. the maximum in the far-field intensity distribution can be continuously shifted from the left to the right and vice versa, as one varies the voltage across the piezo element. This suggests that one may also achieve beam steering in the far-field of a two-mode nanoslit by controlling the linear combination of the two modes.

Fig. 5 Experimental results of the proposed plasmon switching method. The SP intensities I(l)(δ) (red curve) and I(r)(δ) (blue curve) are shown as a function of the phase δ of arm B or, equivalently, as a function of the voltage across the piezo element. The total intensity I(l)(δ) + I(r)(δ) is shown as a dotted grey curve. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of ten independent measurements.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the selective coherent excitation of the two fundamental TM modes in a sub-wavelength slit allows us to launch an approximately constant intensity of surface plasmons either to the left or to the right of the slit; or to distribute them in any desired ratio over these two directions. This gives, for the first time, dynamic control over the directionality of surface plasmons. Our theoretical analysis shows that, although its excitation requires a null illumination at the slit center, the TM1 mode above cutoff offers the potential of higher SP conversion efficiencies compared to narrow sub-wavelength apertures that support only the TM0 mode. Note that the radially polarized TM01 mode of subwavelength circular holes [23

C. Vassallo, Optical Waveguide Concepts (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).

] presents an axial field singularity and is likely, just as the TM1 mode of slits, to efficiently generate SPs.

The present work illustrates how the combination of a static symmetric structure with a versatile illumination scheme may lead to the controlled launching of surface or guided waves at the nanoscale, and as such it may be considered as a generic demonstration. Indeed, further work is needed to realize a competitive device. With additional calculations, we have checked for λ = 0.6 μm that as high as 40% and 55% of the TM0 and TM1 modes are scattered into SPs at the slit exit aperture. Therefore, the throughput of our experimental system is presently limited by the coupling between the incident beams and the slit modes. This coupling can be further improved by increasing either the refractive index of the substrate, or the cross-section of the slit aperture. Different approaches that preserve the symmetry are possible, for example surrounding the slit with an array of optimized phased grooves [13

A. Baron, E. Devaux, J. C. Rodier, J. P. Hugonin, E. Rousseau, C. Genet, T. Ebbesen, and P. Lalanne, “Compact antenna for efficient and unidirectional launching and decoupling of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett. 11, 4207–4212 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,24

F.J. García-Vidal, H. J. Lezec, T. W. Ebbesen, and L. Martín-Moreno, “Multiple paths to enhance optical transmission through a single subwavelength slit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 213901 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,25

A. Degiron and T. W. Ebbesen, “Analysis of the transmission process through single apertures surrounded by periodic corrugations,” Opt. Express 12, 3694–3700 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], or placing a nano-antenna at the near-field of the slit entrance [26

K. Aydin, A. O. Cakmak, L. Sahin, Z. Li, F. Bilotti, L. Vegni, and E. Ozbay, “Split-ring-resonator-coupled enhanced transmission through a single subwavelength aperture,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 013904 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This would keep the transverse size of the switching device below the diffraction limit. A drastic miniaturization of our table-top illumination setup can be achieved with micro-optical components and gratings, and thanks to the very fast development of active plasmonics technologies [27

K. F. MacDonald, Z. L. Sámson, M. I. Stockman, and N. I. Zheludev, “Ultrafast active plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics 3, 55–58 (2009). [CrossRef]

], it would be interesting to investigate architectures for full on-chip integration. Such an ultra-compact plasmonic switch would have potential application in telecommunications and optical sensing.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jacques Bouma for his technical assistance, and Jean-Paul Hugonin for helpful discussions. The sample was fabricated at the IOGS-TRT nanofabrication platform. S.B.R. is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation (STW). T.D.V. acknowledges support from the Plasmonics program of the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM).

References and links

1.

H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

2.

H. A. Atwater, “The promise of plasmonics,” Scientific American 296, 56–62 (2007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff, “Extraordinary optical transmission through subwavelength hole arrays,” Nature (London) 391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]

4.

T. Thio, K. M. Pellerin, R. A. Linke, H. J. Lezec, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Enhanced light transmission through a single subwavelength aperture,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1972–1974 (2001). [CrossRef]

5.

B. Steinberger, A. Hohenau, H. Ditlbacher, F. R. Aussenegg, A. Leitner, and J. R. Krenn, “Dielectric stripes on gold as surface plasmon waveguides: Bends and directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 081111 (2007). [CrossRef]

6.

S. A. Maier, P. G. Kik, H. A. Atwater, S. Meltzer, E. Harel, B. E. Koel, and A. A. G. Requicha, “Local detection of electromagnetic energy transport below the diffraction limit in metal nanoparticle plasmon waveguides,” Nature Materials 2, 229–232 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

Q. Gan, Y. Gao, and F. J. Bartoli, “Vertical plasmonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer for sensitive optical sensing,” Opt. Express 17, 20747–20755 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature (London) 460, 1110–1113 (2009). [CrossRef]

9.

J.S.Q. Liu, R.A. Pala, F. Afshinmanesh, W. Cai, and M.L. Brongersma, “A submicron plasmonic dichroic splitter,” Nat. Commun. 2:525 [CrossRef] (2011). [PubMed]

10.

F. López-Tejeira, S. G. Rodrigo, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, J. R. Krenn, I. P. Radko, M. U. González, J. C. Weeber, and A. Dereux, “Efficient unidirectional nanoslit couplers for surface plasmons,” Nat. Phys. 3, 324–328 (2007). [CrossRef]

11.

Y. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Tang, K. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Song, T. Wei, and C. H. Wang, “A tunable unidirectional surface plasmon polaritons source,” Opt. Express 17, 20457–20464 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

X. Li, Q. Tan, B. Bai, and G. Jin, “Experimental demonstration of tunable directional excitation of surface plasmon polaritons with a subwavelength metallic double slit,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 251109 (2011). [CrossRef]

13.

A. Baron, E. Devaux, J. C. Rodier, J. P. Hugonin, E. Rousseau, C. Genet, T. Ebbesen, and P. Lalanne, “Compact antenna for efficient and unidirectional launching and decoupling of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett. 11, 4207–4212 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

M. Miyata and J. Takahara, “Excitation control of long-range surface plasmons by two incident beams,” Opt. Express 20, 9493–9500 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

M. Besbes, J. P. Hugonin, P. Lalanne, S. van Haver, O. T. A. Janssen, A. M. Nugrowati, M. Xu, S. F. Pereira, H.P. Urbach, A. S. van de Nes, P. Bienstman, G. Granet, A. Moreau, S. Helfert, M. Sukharev, T. Seideman, F. I. Baida, B. Guizal, and D. Van Labeke, “Numerical analysis of a slit-groove diffraction problem,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ. 2, 07022 (2007). [CrossRef]

16.

P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, H. Liu, and B. Wang, “A microscopic view of the electromagnetic properties of sub-λ metallic surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep. 64, 453–469 (2009). [CrossRef]

17.

E. D. Palik (ed.), Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).

18.

H. Liu, P. Lalanne, X. Yang, and J. P. Hugonin “Surface plasmon generation by subwavelength isolated objects,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14, 1522–1529 (2008). [CrossRef]

19.

L. Verslegers, Z. Yu, P. B. Catrysse, and S. Fan, “Temporal coupled-mode theory for resonant apertures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1947–1956 (2010). [CrossRef]

20.

C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).

21.

J. A. Schuller and M. L. Brongersma, “General properties of dielectric optical antennas,” Opt. Express 17, 24084–24095 (2009). [CrossRef]

22.

P. Lalanne and J. P. Hugonin, “Interaction between optical nano-objects at metallo-dielectric interfaces,” Nat. Phys. 2, 551–556, (2006). [CrossRef]

23.

C. Vassallo, Optical Waveguide Concepts (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).

24.

F.J. García-Vidal, H. J. Lezec, T. W. Ebbesen, and L. Martín-Moreno, “Multiple paths to enhance optical transmission through a single subwavelength slit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 213901 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

A. Degiron and T. W. Ebbesen, “Analysis of the transmission process through single apertures surrounded by periodic corrugations,” Opt. Express 12, 3694–3700 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26.

K. Aydin, A. O. Cakmak, L. Sahin, Z. Li, F. Bilotti, L. Vegni, and E. Ozbay, “Split-ring-resonator-coupled enhanced transmission through a single subwavelength aperture,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 013904 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

K. F. MacDonald, Z. L. Sámson, M. I. Stockman, and N. I. Zheludev, “Ultrafast active plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics 3, 55–58 (2009). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(240.6680) Optics at surfaces : Surface plasmons
(260.1960) Physical optics : Diffraction theory
(310.2790) Thin films : Guided waves
(310.2785) Thin films : Guided wave applications
(250.5403) Optoelectronics : Plasmonics
(240.3990) Optics at surfaces : Micro-optical devices

ToC Category:
Optics at Surfaces

History
Original Manuscript: May 3, 2012
Revised Manuscript: June 11, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: June 14, 2012
Published: June 22, 2012

Citation
S. B. Raghunathan, C. H. Gan, T. van Dijk, B. Ea Kim, H. F. Schouten, W. Ubachs, P. Lalanne, and T. D. Visser, "Plasmon switching: Observation of dynamic surface plasmon steering by selective mode excitation in a sub-wavelength slit," Opt. Express 20, 15326-15335 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-14-15326


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Raether, Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
  2. H. A. Atwater, “The promise of plasmonics,” Scientific American296, 56–62 (2007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff, “Extraordinary optical transmission through subwavelength hole arrays,” Nature (London)391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]
  4. T. Thio, K. M. Pellerin, R. A. Linke, H. J. Lezec, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Enhanced light transmission through a single subwavelength aperture,” Opt. Lett.26, 1972–1974 (2001). [CrossRef]
  5. B. Steinberger, A. Hohenau, H. Ditlbacher, F. R. Aussenegg, A. Leitner, and J. R. Krenn, “Dielectric stripes on gold as surface plasmon waveguides: Bends and directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett.91, 081111 (2007). [CrossRef]
  6. S. A. Maier, P. G. Kik, H. A. Atwater, S. Meltzer, E. Harel, B. E. Koel, and A. A. G. Requicha, “Local detection of electromagnetic energy transport below the diffraction limit in metal nanoparticle plasmon waveguides,” Nature Materials2, 229–232 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Q. Gan, Y. Gao, and F. J. Bartoli, “Vertical plasmonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer for sensitive optical sensing,” Opt. Express17, 20747–20755 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature (London)460, 1110–1113 (2009). [CrossRef]
  9. J.S.Q. Liu, R.A. Pala, F. Afshinmanesh, W. Cai, and M.L. Brongersma, “A submicron plasmonic dichroic splitter,” Nat. Commun.2:525 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. F. López-Tejeira, S. G. Rodrigo, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, J. R. Krenn, I. P. Radko, M. U. González, J. C. Weeber, and A. Dereux, “Efficient unidirectional nanoslit couplers for surface plasmons,” Nat. Phys.3, 324–328 (2007). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Tang, K. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Song, T. Wei, and C. H. Wang, “A tunable unidirectional surface plasmon polaritons source,” Opt. Express17, 20457–20464 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. X. Li, Q. Tan, B. Bai, and G. Jin, “Experimental demonstration of tunable directional excitation of surface plasmon polaritons with a subwavelength metallic double slit,” Appl. Phys. Lett.98, 251109 (2011). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Baron, E. Devaux, J. C. Rodier, J. P. Hugonin, E. Rousseau, C. Genet, T. Ebbesen, and P. Lalanne, “Compact antenna for efficient and unidirectional launching and decoupling of surface plasmons,” Nano Lett.11, 4207–4212 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. M. Miyata and J. Takahara, “Excitation control of long-range surface plasmons by two incident beams,” Opt. Express20, 9493–9500 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. M. Besbes, J. P. Hugonin, P. Lalanne, S. van Haver, O. T. A. Janssen, A. M. Nugrowati, M. Xu, S. F. Pereira, H.P. Urbach, A. S. van de Nes, P. Bienstman, G. Granet, A. Moreau, S. Helfert, M. Sukharev, T. Seideman, F. I. Baida, B. Guizal, and D. Van Labeke, “Numerical analysis of a slit-groove diffraction problem,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ.2, 07022 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. P. Lalanne, J. P. Hugonin, H. Liu, and B. Wang, “A microscopic view of the electromagnetic properties of sub-λ metallic surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep.64, 453–469 (2009). [CrossRef]
  17. E. D. Palik (ed.), Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).
  18. H. Liu, P. Lalanne, X. Yang, and J. P. Hugonin “Surface plasmon generation by subwavelength isolated objects,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.14, 1522–1529 (2008). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Verslegers, Z. Yu, P. B. Catrysse, and S. Fan, “Temporal coupled-mode theory for resonant apertures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B27, 1947–1956 (2010). [CrossRef]
  20. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  21. J. A. Schuller and M. L. Brongersma, “General properties of dielectric optical antennas,” Opt. Express17, 24084–24095 (2009). [CrossRef]
  22. P. Lalanne and J. P. Hugonin, “Interaction between optical nano-objects at metallo-dielectric interfaces,” Nat. Phys.2, 551–556, (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. C. Vassallo, Optical Waveguide Concepts (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).
  24. F.J. García-Vidal, H. J. Lezec, T. W. Ebbesen, and L. Martín-Moreno, “Multiple paths to enhance optical transmission through a single subwavelength slit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 213901 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. A. Degiron and T. W. Ebbesen, “Analysis of the transmission process through single apertures surrounded by periodic corrugations,” Opt. Express12, 3694–3700 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. K. Aydin, A. O. Cakmak, L. Sahin, Z. Li, F. Bilotti, L. Vegni, and E. Ozbay, “Split-ring-resonator-coupled enhanced transmission through a single subwavelength aperture,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 013904 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. K. F. MacDonald, Z. L. Sámson, M. I. Stockman, and N. I. Zheludev, “Ultrafast active plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics3, 55–58 (2009). [CrossRef]

Cited By

 Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited