Robust phase-shift-keying Silicon photonic modulator

doi:10.1364/OE.20.017440

« Show journal navigation

Robust phase-shift-keying Silicon photonic modulator

Donald Adams, Abdelsalam Aboketaf, and Stefan Preble »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 16, pp. 17440-17447 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.017440

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1489 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Binary phase encoding using ring resonators
3. Modulation via free-carrier injection/extraction
4. Performance
5. Conclusions
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (17)
Cited By
Figures (6)
Metrics

Abstract

Here we propose a robust silicon modulator that seamlessly generates phase shift keyed data. The modulator has very low insertion loss and is robust against electrical amplitude variations in the modulating signal; specifically a 50%-200% variation in modulating amplitude leads to only a π/9 variation in output optical phase, corresponding to only ± 10% variation in the differentially detected signal. This yields a ~2.5dB enhancement in SNR over OOK (on-off-keying) formats.

1. Introduction

Efficient optical interconnects are one of the most promising application of Silicon photonics [1

A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]

D. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to Silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. The fundamental element of any optical interconnect is the electro-optic modulator, and there have been many successful demonstrations of amplitude based silicon modulators [1

A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]

D. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to Silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. However, phase encoded modulation has been required for the advancement of all communication technologies. For example, while amplitude modulation was used in optical fiber communications for decades, by the beginning of the last decade there was a rapid transition to phase based encodings due to the exponentially increasing bandwidth requirements of the internet [3

C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Silicon photonics is experiencing a similar demand for bandwidth and will also need to move towards using phase encodings [1

A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]

D. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to Silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. There are several reasons that phase modulation is preferred over amplitude modulation: (1) Maximization of signal/noise; (2) Minimization of nonlinear effects; (3) Maximization of channel efficiency (which translates to increased system bandwidth).

As a result phase encoded signals on silicon chip have received increasing attention. There have been several recent studies of the transmission, switching and receiving of phase encoded signals [4

L. Xu, W. Zhang, Q. Li, J. Chan, H. L. R. Lira, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “40-Gb/s DPSK data transmission through a Silicon microring switch,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(6), 473–475 (2012). [CrossRef]

–6

R. Kou, K. Yamada, H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, T. Watanabe, H. Shinojima, and S. Itabashi, “DPSK demodulation with a single Silicon photonic nanowire waveguide,” in 8th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP), (2011), pp. 323–325.

]. In addition, there have been initial developments in silicon modulators for phase encoding. The first compact microring based phase modulator was proposed in [7

L. Zhang, J. Y. Yang, M. Song, Y. Li, B. Zhang, R. G. Beausoleil, and A. E. Willner, “Microring-based modulation and demodulation of DPSK signal,” Opt. Express 15(18), 11564–11569 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and using this design high speed binary phase-shift keyed (BPSK) and quadrature phase-shift-keyed (QPSK) modulators were demonstrated in [8

P. Dong, C. Xie, L. Chen, N. K. Fontaine, and Y. K. Chen, “Experimental demonstration of microring quadrature phase-shift keying modulators,” Opt. Lett. 37(7), 1178–1180 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–10

K. Padmaraju, N. Ophir, Q. Xu, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, S. Manipatruni, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “Error-free transmission of DPSK at 5 Gb/s using a Silicon microring modulator,” in 37th European Conference and Exposition on Optical Communications, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper Th.12.LeSaleve.2.

]. However, in all cases the devices required precise voltage inputs, and had high insertion loss.

Here we propose a completely new approach for realizing a compact binary phase modulator. Our design is based on a single ring resonator, with a key output configuration that enables low insertion loss, and robust high speed phase modulation. Using this design it will be possible to realize all of the advantages of phase encoding, particularly the ~3dB enhancement in SNR over OOK [3

C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. In addition, our design can be extended to the realization of advanced phase encoding formats, such as QPSK and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM).

2. Binary phase encoding using ring resonators

In order to understand how a ring resonator can be used to modulate phase, consider the spectral response of a ring resonator with a through and drop port:

\frac{Y_{t h r o u g h}}{X} = \frac{c_{1} - c_{2} e^{- (α + j β) 2 π R}}{1 - c_{1} c_{2} e^{- (α + j β) 2 π R}}

(1)

\frac{Y_{d r o p}}{X} = \frac{- s_{1} s_{2} e^{- (α + j β) π R}}{1 - c_{1} c_{2} e^{- (α + j β) 2 π R}}

(2)

where R is the radius of the ring,

c_{1, 2} = \sqrt{1 - κ_{1, 2}}

s_{1, 2} = \sqrt{κ_{1, 2}}

κ_{1, 2}

represents the power coupling ratio at the through and drop ports respectively,

α

is the waveguide amplitude attenuation coefficient of a curved waveguide of radius R, and

β = 2 π n_{g} / λ

is the waveguide propagation constant where

n_{g}

is the waveguide group refractive index. First we consider the case of a singly coupled ring response which is obtained by setting

κ_{2} = 0

(see Figs. 1(a) –1(c)). This configuration is identical to those found in [7

–10

] and realizes the requisite 0 and π phases for BPSK by operating at two equal amplitude points of an over-coupled resonance. However, this scheme inherently requires precise control of the modulation signal as experimentally observed in [8

–10

Fig. 1 (a) Singly coupled ring configuration. (b) Spectral amplitude response and (c) spectral phase response of the singly coupled ring. A π phase-shift can be induced by operating at two opposite points, with equal amplitude, on the resonance curve. (d) Dually coupled ring configuration. (e) Spectral amplitude response and (f) spectral phase response of the dually coupled ring.

In contrast, consider a ring resonator with equal through and drop ports (

κ_{2} = κ_{1}

). As shown in Figs. 1(d)–1(f), when the resonator is off-resonance, the optical power passes to the through port and experiences no phase shift, and when the ring is on resonance, the optical power passes to the drop port and experiences a π phase shift. Therefore, by combining the through and drop port outputs it is possible to realize an optical signal with the required 0 and π phases for BPSK.

To achieve PSK operation the phase shifted signal should be on one output not two, therefore the through and drop ports must be combined. Rather than combining the through and drop ports with a y-splitter or directional coupler (which will induce 3db of loss) we propose to connect the through port output to the drop port input, which we will refer to as a feed-through waveguide (see Fig. 2(a) , path l₂). This will ensure that the device has a minimal insertion loss. A rigorous derivation of the spectral response of this device can be found in [11

G. Barbarossa, A. M. Matteo, and M. N. Armenise, “Theoretical analysis of triple-coupler ring-based optical guided-wave resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(2), 148–157 (1995). [CrossRef]

], and yields:

\frac{Y_{2}}{X_{1}} = \frac{(c_{1} c_{2} e^{- (α + j β) l_{1}} - s_{1} s_{2} e^{- (α + j β) l_{2}} + e^{- (α + j β) (l_{1} + l_{2} + l_{3})}) e^{j β l_{2}}}{e^{- (α + j β) l_{3}} (s_{1} s_{2} e^{- (α + j β) l_{1}} - c_{1} c_{2} e^{- (α + j β) l_{2}}) - 1}

(3)

where l₁ l₂ and l₃ represent the lengths of waveguide from coupler to coupler as shown in Fig. 2(a). In [11

G. Barbarossa, A. M. Matteo, and M. N. Armenise, “Theoretical analysis of triple-coupler ring-based optical guided-wave resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(2), 148–157 (1995). [CrossRef]

] it was also shown that optical loss will be minimized first by setting κ₁ equal to κ₂, and second by adjusting the lengths l₁ l₂ and l₃ such that:

β (l_{1} + l_{3}) = (\frac{2 π n_{g}}{λ}) (l_{1} + l_{3}) = M π

(4)

β (l_{2} + l_{3}) = (\frac{2 π n_{g}}{λ}) (l_{2} + l_{3}) = M π

(5)

where M and N are even numbers. For the case where

l_{2} = l_{1} + l_{3}

, each resonance will be optimally coupled. This is shown in Figs. 2(b)–2(d) with

l_{1} = π \cdot 5 μ m

l_{3} = π \cdot 5 μ m

l_{2} = 2 π \cdot 5 μ m

, and

n_{g} = 4.1

. The amplitude response is nearly constant with respect to wavelength, with a very small dip, <5% for 3dB/cm loss in a 5μm radius ring as shown in Fig. 2(c). Consequently, the device allows low loss phase modulation operating at two points: on-resonance (π) and off-resonance (0).

Fig. 2 (a) Ring resonator PSK modulator. (b) The ring’s wideband spectral amplitude response shows only one phase matched resonance (c) spectral amplitude and (d) phase response of the phase matched resonance.

These operating points ensure significantly more robust PSK modulation because the (0), off-resonance condition, can be realized over a wide range of wavelengths, significantly reducing requirements on the electronic control of the device. However, it should be noted that these operating points could in theory be achieved with a single coupled ring resonator. However a close inspection of Eq. (3) reveals a subtle advantage of the dual-coupled design. Assuming

κ_{2} = κ_{1} < < 0.5

then small index changing effects in waveguide sections l₁ and l₃ will lead to large changes in the resonant wavelength of the device, whereas small index changing effects in waveguide section l₂ will lead to small changes in the resonant wavelength of the device. Effectively this can be thought of as granting a course tuning and fine tuning mechanism for the resonant condition of the device, respectively. Since the exact resonant condition greatly affects the on resonance phase (π), the symbol distance and ultimately the SNR, a high-sensitivity tuning mechanism will ensure practical deployment of this device.

As an additional verification of the results, finite-difference-time-domain (FDTD) simulations were performed. As shown in Figs. 3(a) –3(b), when the ring is on resonance the majority of the power passes into the ring (drop port); whereas when the ring is off resonance the majority of the power passes through the feed-through waveguide.

Fig. 3 (a) FDTD simulation of a narrowband off-resonance input. (b) FDTD simulation of a narrowband on-resonance input; note the normalized optical amplitude in the ring is actually much greater than 2.

3. Modulation via free-carrier injection/extraction

In principle, the proposed device could be made to function with any index changing effect. Here we will focus on the predominant modulation effect available in Silicon - the free-carrier plasma dispersion effect [12

R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in Silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(1), 123–129 (1987). [CrossRef]

]. It is well known that free-carrier modulation can be performed in a variety of ways, including injection/extraction with a p-i-n diode, depletion region modulation with a reverse biased diode, and others. As will be shown, injection/extraction with a p-i-n diode complements the optical design of the device. Specifically under forward-bias conditions there will be a significant carrier concentration, more than sufficient to shift the resonator to the (0) phase point. And in extraction, very few carriers will be present, ensuring that the (π) phase condition is met, provided thermal effects can be corrected for [13

S. Manipatruni, R. K. Dokania, B. Schmidt, N. Sherwood-Droz, C. B. Poitras, A. B. Apsel, and M. Lipson, “Wide temperature range operation of micrometer-scale Silicon electro-optic modulators,” Opt. Lett. 33(19), 2185–2187 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,14

M. R. Watts, W. A. Zortman, D. C. Trotter, G. N. Nielson, D. L. Luck, and R. W. Young, “Adiabatic resonant microrings (ARMs) with directly integrated thermal microphotonics,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (2009), paper CPDB10.

]. In contrast depletion region modulation with a reversed biased diode could be used, but is challenging since the effect is relatively weak, in comparison to injection. While it is potentially faster than injection based devices, it requires careful design of the waveguide and diode which is beyond the scope of this work.

Charge injection by a p-i-n diode into a Silicon waveguide was modeled using the charge dynamics model found in [15

Q. Xu, S. Manipatruni, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, and M. Lipson, “12.5 Gbit/s carrier-injection-based Silicon micro-ring Silicon modulators,” Opt. Express 15(2), 430–436 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Figure 4(a) shows the average carrier density as a function of forward bias when the carrier response has evolved for 1ns, 200ps, and 100ps after the voltage has been applied (a step function is used). In order to obtain the optical response of the device first we calculate the change in the phase of the device for various index changes, as seen in Fig. 4(c). This was obtained using Eq. (3), with the substitutions:

n_{g} = n_{g i} + d n_{g}

, and

α = α_{i} + d α

, where

n_{g i} = 4.1

and

α_{i} = 0.69

are the group index and amplitude attenuation coefficients of the waveguide without carriers, and

d α

and

d n_{g}

are the change in absorption and index as a function of carrier concentration (Fig. 4(b)) [12

R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in Silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(1), 123–129 (1987). [CrossRef]

]. Additionally

l_{1} = π \cdot 5 μ m

l_{3} = π \cdot 5 μ m

l_{2} = 2 π \cdot 5 μ m

and

κ_{2} = κ_{1} = 0.02

. The model assumes that the device is on resonance when no carriers are present in the ring.

Fig. 4 (a) Forward Biased p-i-n junction current as a function of voltage for a 1ns, 200ps and 100ps rise time. (b) Refractive index change as a function of carrier density [11

G. Barbarossa, A. M. Matteo, and M. N. Armenise, “Theoretical analysis of triple-coupler ring-based optical guided-wave resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(2), 148–157 (1995). [CrossRef]

]. (c) The output phase of the proposed device as a function of waveguide index change. (d) The output phase of the proposed device as a function of voltage.

By combining Figs. 4(a)–4(c), we obtain the proposed device output phase as a function of input voltage. As shown in Fig. 4(d), this phase has a sharp response near threshold, and remains relatively constant otherwise. Therefore the device is robust against voltage variation for both the 0 and π phase condition. However as the switching speed increases the response widens, as expected, since the carrier response does not reach a steady state. This can be optimized in any given design by making tradeoffs in the quality factor of the ring and power requirements.

4. Performance

In order to further quantify the robustness of the device we have simulated the effect of drastically varying input voltage on the response. Because Eq. (3) assumes steady-state operation, this simulation uses the following temporal equation model of the device:

y_{1} (t) = c_{1} x_{1} (t) + s_{1} r_{3} (t)

(6)

y_{2} (t) = c_{2} x_{2} (t) + s_{2} r_{1} (t)

(7)

x_{2} (t) = \exp (- (α + j \frac{2 π n_{g}}{λ}) l_{2}) y_{1} (t - T_{2})

(8)

r_{1} (t) = \exp (- (α + d α + j \frac{2 π (n_{g} + d n)}{λ}) l_{1}) (s_{1} x_{1} (t - T_{1}) + c_{1} r_{3} (t - T_{1}))

(9)

r_{3} (t) = \exp (- (α + d α + j \frac{2 π (n_{g} + d n)}{λ}) l_{3}) (s_{2} x_{2} (t - T_{3}) + c_{2} r_{1} (t - T_{3}))

(10)

where r_1,3 are the electric-field in the ring in the corresponding sections l₁ and l₃,

T_{1, 2, 3} = l_{1, 2, 3} n_{g} / c

, c is the speed of light, and dα and dn are determined using the previously described p-i-n diode models, with a 10Gbps modulating input. Figure 5(a) shows the input voltages, ranging from 50% to 200% variation of optimal performance for the device, for both square wave and sine wave inputs in order to characterize variations in rise/fall time. The corresponding carrier concentration change is shown in Fig. 5(b) and its effect on output optical phase is shown in Fig. 5(c). Despite large variation in input voltage and carrier concentration the output optical signal remains relatively constant (phase varies by <π/9, which as explained next will only degrade SNR by only 0.5dB). This is for three reasons: (1) the 0 phase symbol can be achieved over a wide range of operating points due to the flat transfer function seen in Fig. 4(d). (2) The π phase symbol is realized when the diode is effectively off, making it insensitive to voltage variations. While the π phase symbol will still be sensitive to thermal fluctuations, this is an issue of all microring based modulators and a variety of techniques have been employed to minimize this [13

,14

]. (3) The feed-through waveguide enables high sensitivity tuning of the relative phase between the two symbols, ensuring maximum symbol distance.

Fig. 5 (a) Modulating voltage input (50-200% of optimal) with square wave and sine wave (~100ps rise) signals. (b) Average carrier concentration in the waveguide. (c) Optical output amplitude and (d) optical output phase of the proposed device. (e) Signal amplitude resulting from differential detection. Levels yield a 2.5db ± 0.2db output.

To evaluate the performance of this device in a PSK interconnect system we have modeled a standard differential detection scheme (e.g. where a one-bit time delayed interferometer is used to interfere adjacent symbols) [3

C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. The results are seen in Fig. 5(d), where the 10Gbit/s optical output (Fig. 5(c)) is differentially detected. It is seen that the differentially detected signal amplitude spans ± 0.9 ± 0.05, which in part is achieved by tuning the phase in the feed-through waveguide to π/9 to counteract the minor phase offset in high speed operation. Therefore, the proposed device directly gains a 2.5 dB enhancement in SNR over OOK, which is comparable to measured results in commercial grade PSK based telecommunication systems [3

C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]

The amplitude variations in the output signal are also of importance in evaluating the performance of the modulator, and are shown in Fig. 6(a) . It is seen that there are peaks and dips, which inherently are caused by the build-up and release of energy in the ring resonator. Firstly, these amplitude fluctuations correspond to the bit transitions and minimally impact the differentially detected signal in Fig. 5(d). They can also potentially be used for clock-recovery, as is the case in Mach-Zehnder based PSK modulators [3

C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Secondly, the amplitude variations correspond to points where the phase makes transitions as seen in Fig. 6(b), which leads to chirp in the optical signal. This can also be represented by the complex plane diagram (Fig. 6(c)), which demonstrates that the chirp of the π-to-0 transition is considerably larger than the 0-to-π transition. However, while chirp is of a concern in telecommunication systems with long lengths fiber, it is much less significant for chip-scale optical interconnect applications. Specifically by taking the temporal derivative of the phase output the maximum chirp of the modulator when operating at 10 Gbit/s was determined to be ~40GHz. The largest dispersion in Silicon waveguides is considerably less than 10000ps/nmkm [16

A. C. Turner, C. Manolatou, B. S. Schmidt, M. Lipson, M. A. Foster, J. E. Sharping, and A. L. Gaeta, “Tailored anomalous group-velocity dispersion in Silicon channel waveguides,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4357–4362 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and with propagation lengths on the order of only centimeters this would only yield a signal shift <100fs, which is negligible at 10 Gbit/s. Lastly, the amplitude variations could induce non-linear effects. However, we expect these will be minimal since similar amplitude spikes in microring based OOK modulators have been shown to have a minor impact [12

R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in Silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(1), 123–129 (1987). [CrossRef]

,17

A. Biberman, S. Manipatruni, N. Ophir, L. Chen, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “First demonstration of long-haul transmission using Silicon microring modulators,” Opt. Express 18(15), 15544–15552 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Regardless we expect the nonlinearities will be even less than with OOK since the amplitude is considerably more constant in PSK.

Fig. 6 (a) Optical output amplitude of the PSK modulator. (b) Phase output with the two transitions highlighted (0 to pi; pi to 0) (c) Complex plane transition diagram.

5. Conclusions

Here we have presented a novel microring phase-shift-keyed modulator. It realizes low insertion loss while being relatively insensitive to modulation variations. This will allow for high speed performance over a wide range of operating conditions. Additionally even though the proposed device produces a BPSK signal, it can be easily be extended to more complicated QPSK and QAM designs [8

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Gernot Pomrenke, of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research for his support under FA9550-10-1-0217.

References and links

1.	A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]
2.	D. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to Silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]
3.	C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]
4.	L. Xu, W. Zhang, Q. Li, J. Chan, H. L. R. Lira, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “40-Gb/s DPSK data transmission through a Silicon microring switch,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(6), 473–475 (2012). [CrossRef]
5.	Y. Ding, J. Xu, C. Peucheret, M. Pu, L. Liu, J. Seoane, H. Ou, X. Zhang, and D. Huang, “Multi-channel 40 Gbit/s NRZ-DPSK demodulation using a single Silicon microring resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(5), 677–684 (2011). [CrossRef]
6.	R. Kou, K. Yamada, H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, T. Watanabe, H. Shinojima, and S. Itabashi, “DPSK demodulation with a single Silicon photonic nanowire waveguide,” in 8th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP), (2011), pp. 323–325.
7.	L. Zhang, J. Y. Yang, M. Song, Y. Li, B. Zhang, R. G. Beausoleil, and A. E. Willner, “Microring-based modulation and demodulation of DPSK signal,” Opt. Express 15(18), 11564–11569 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.	P. Dong, C. Xie, L. Chen, N. K. Fontaine, and Y. K. Chen, “Experimental demonstration of microring quadrature phase-shift keying modulators,” Opt. Lett. 37(7), 1178–1180 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	J. Lloret, R. Kumar, S. Sales, F. Ramos, G. Morthier, P. Mechet, T. Spuesens, D. V. Thourhout, N. Olivier, J. Fédéli, and J. Capmany, “Ultra-compact electro-optic phase modulator based on III-V-on-Silicon microdisk resonator,” Opt. Lett. 37(12), 2379–2381 (2012).
10.	K. Padmaraju, N. Ophir, Q. Xu, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, S. Manipatruni, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “Error-free transmission of DPSK at 5 Gb/s using a Silicon microring modulator,” in 37th European Conference and Exposition on Optical Communications, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper Th.12.LeSaleve.2.
11.	G. Barbarossa, A. M. Matteo, and M. N. Armenise, “Theoretical analysis of triple-coupler ring-based optical guided-wave resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(2), 148–157 (1995). [CrossRef]
12.	R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in Silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23(1), 123–129 (1987). [CrossRef]
13.	S. Manipatruni, R. K. Dokania, B. Schmidt, N. Sherwood-Droz, C. B. Poitras, A. B. Apsel, and M. Lipson, “Wide temperature range operation of micrometer-scale Silicon electro-optic modulators,” Opt. Lett. 33(19), 2185–2187 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	M. R. Watts, W. A. Zortman, D. C. Trotter, G. N. Nielson, D. L. Luck, and R. W. Young, “Adiabatic resonant microrings (ARMs) with directly integrated thermal microphotonics,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (2009), paper CPDB10.
15.	Q. Xu, S. Manipatruni, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, and M. Lipson, “12.5 Gbit/s carrier-injection-based Silicon micro-ring Silicon modulators,” Opt. Express 15(2), 430–436 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.	A. C. Turner, C. Manolatou, B. S. Schmidt, M. Lipson, M. A. Foster, J. E. Sharping, and A. L. Gaeta, “Tailored anomalous group-velocity dispersion in Silicon channel waveguides,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4357–4362 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.	A. Biberman, S. Manipatruni, N. Ophir, L. Chen, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “First demonstration of long-haul transmission using Silicon microring modulators,” Opt. Express 18(15), 15544–15552 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(130.3120) Integrated optics : Integrated optics devices
(130.5990) Integrated optics : Semiconductors
(130.4110) Integrated optics : Modulators

ToC Category:
Integrated Optics

History
Original Manuscript: March 29, 2012
Revised Manuscript: June 4, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: July 10, 2012
Published: July 17, 2012

Citation
Donald Adams, Abdelsalam Aboketaf, and Stefan Preble, "Robust phase-shift-keying Silicon photonic modulator," Opt. Express 20, 17440-17447 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-16-17440

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput.57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]
D. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to Silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]
C. Xu, X. Liu, and X. Wei, “Differential phase-shift keying for high spectral efficiency optical transmissions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.10(2), 281–293 (2004). [CrossRef]
L. Xu, W. Zhang, Q. Li, J. Chan, H. L. R. Lira, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “40-Gb/s DPSK data transmission through a Silicon microring switch,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.24(6), 473–475 (2012). [CrossRef]
Y. Ding, J. Xu, C. Peucheret, M. Pu, L. Liu, J. Seoane, H. Ou, X. Zhang, and D. Huang, “Multi-channel 40 Gbit/s NRZ-DPSK demodulation using a single Silicon microring resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol.29(5), 677–684 (2011). [CrossRef]
R. Kou, K. Yamada, H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, T. Watanabe, H. Shinojima, and S. Itabashi, “DPSK demodulation with a single Silicon photonic nanowire waveguide,” in 8th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP), (2011), pp. 323–325.
L. Zhang, J. Y. Yang, M. Song, Y. Li, B. Zhang, R. G. Beausoleil, and A. E. Willner, “Microring-based modulation and demodulation of DPSK signal,” Opt. Express15(18), 11564–11569 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Dong, C. Xie, L. Chen, N. K. Fontaine, and Y. K. Chen, “Experimental demonstration of microring quadrature phase-shift keying modulators,” Opt. Lett.37(7), 1178–1180 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Lloret, R. Kumar, S. Sales, F. Ramos, G. Morthier, P. Mechet, T. Spuesens, D. V. Thourhout, N. Olivier, J. Fédéli, and J. Capmany, “Ultra-compact electro-optic phase modulator based on III-V-on-Silicon microdisk resonator,” Opt. Lett.37(12), 2379–2381 (2012).
K. Padmaraju, N. Ophir, Q. Xu, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, S. Manipatruni, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “Error-free transmission of DPSK at 5 Gb/s using a Silicon microring modulator,” in 37th European Conference and Exposition on Optical Communications, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper Th.12.LeSaleve.2.
G. Barbarossa, A. M. Matteo, and M. N. Armenise, “Theoretical analysis of triple-coupler ring-based optical guided-wave resonator,” J. Lightwave Technol.13(2), 148–157 (1995). [CrossRef]
R. A. Soref and B. R. Bennett, “Electrooptical effects in Silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.23(1), 123–129 (1987). [CrossRef]
S. Manipatruni, R. K. Dokania, B. Schmidt, N. Sherwood-Droz, C. B. Poitras, A. B. Apsel, and M. Lipson, “Wide temperature range operation of micrometer-scale Silicon electro-optic modulators,” Opt. Lett.33(19), 2185–2187 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. R. Watts, W. A. Zortman, D. C. Trotter, G. N. Nielson, D. L. Luck, and R. W. Young, “Adiabatic resonant microrings (ARMs) with directly integrated thermal microphotonics,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (2009), paper CPDB10.
Q. Xu, S. Manipatruni, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, and M. Lipson, “12.5 Gbit/s carrier-injection-based Silicon micro-ring Silicon modulators,” Opt. Express15(2), 430–436 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. C. Turner, C. Manolatou, B. S. Schmidt, M. Lipson, M. A. Foster, J. E. Sharping, and A. L. Gaeta, “Tailored anomalous group-velocity dispersion in Silicon channel waveguides,” Opt. Express14(10), 4357–4362 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. Biberman, S. Manipatruni, N. Ophir, L. Chen, M. Lipson, and K. Bergman, “First demonstration of long-haul transmission using Silicon microring modulators,” Opt. Express18(15), 15544–15552 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper