OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 20, Iss. 19 — Sep. 10, 2012
  • pp: 20855–20862

Optics InfoBase > Optics Express > Volume 20 > Issue 19 > Page 20855

« Show journal navigation

Mode-locking of a terahertz laser by direct phase synchronization

J. Maysonnave, K. Maussang, J. R. Freeman, N. Jukam, J. Madéo, P. Cavalié, R. Rungsawang, S.P. Khanna, E.H. Linfield, A.G. Davies, H.E. Beere, D.A. Ritchie, S.S. Dhillon, and J. Tignon  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 19, pp. 20855-20862 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.020855


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1523 KB)


Advanced Search

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A novel scheme to achieve mode-locking of a multimode laser is demonstrated. Traditional methods to produce ultrashort laser pulses are based on modulating the cavity gain or losses at the cavity roundtrip frequency, favoring the pulsed emission. Here, we rather directly act on the phases of the modes, resulting in constructive interference for the appropriated phase relationship. This was performed on a terahertz quantum cascade laser by multimode injection seeding with an external terahertz pulse, resulting in phase mode-locked terahertz laser pulses of 9ps duration, characterized unambiguously in the time domain.

© 2012 OSA

1. Introduction

Ultrashort pulses of light have attracted great interest for decades [1

L. E. Hargrove, R. L. Fork, and M. A. Pollack, “Locking of He-Ne laser modes induces by synchronous intracavity modulation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 5(1), 4–5 (1964). [CrossRef]

–4

U. Keller, “Recent Developments in compact ultrafast lasers,” Nature 424(6950), 831–838 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], resulting in major fundamental and technological advances, from metrology [5

T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] to industrial applications [4

U. Keller, “Recent Developments in compact ultrafast lasers,” Nature 424(6950), 831–838 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. They result from the temporal interference between modes that are equally spaced in the frequency domain by the free spectral range (FSR) of a cavity (Fig. 1(a) ). For N modes with a random phase relationship, the combined intensity is random as well, with mean amplitude scaling as N (Fig. 1(b), green curve). If, however, the phase difference between consecutive modes is fixed and constant in time, the laser is described as modelocked. The interference is then constructive, leading to the formation of a pulse train with peak intensity scaling as N2 and period T given by the round trip time (Fig. 1(b), blue curve). The experimental realization of mode-locking is based on two key elements [6

T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72(2), 545–591 (2000). [CrossRef]

]: first, a broadband gain medium that provides a large number of lasing modes leading to shorter pulses (~T/N); second, a mechanism that fixes the phase relationship between lasing modes. This is usually performed through internal modulation of the cavity, either active (e.g. using an acousto-optic modulator) or passive (e.g. the optical Kerr effect). Additionally, the fixed phase relationship may also be disrupted by the group velocity dispersion (GVD) of the medium. This can be compensated to achieve mode-locking by, for example, using an anomalous dispersive element.

Fig. 1 a) Frequency domain representation for N = 12 modes with equal amplitude. b) Corresponding time domain intensity profile. A given amplitude spectrum results in different behaviors in the time domain depending on the phase relationship between modes. The case of mode-locking, where all modes have the same phase, is illustrated in blue, whereas the case of a random phase distribution is shown in green.

Since the original demonstration of mode-locking [1

L. E. Hargrove, R. L. Fork, and M. A. Pollack, “Locking of He-Ne laser modes induces by synchronous intracavity modulation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 5(1), 4–5 (1964). [CrossRef]

], there has been a constant effort to realize similar schemes in various regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. The terahertz (THz) frequency domain, corresponding to energies in the milli-electronvolt range, has enormous potential for the exploration of intersubband physics in semiconductors, superconductors, imaging, gas analysis or biological applications [7

D. Mittleman, Sensing with Terahertz Radiation (Springer, 2002).

, 8

M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. In 2002, quantum cascade lasers (QCL) emerge as compact, powerful and efficient sources of THz radiation [9

R. Köhler, A. Tredicucci, F. Beltram, H. E. Beere, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, D. A. Ritchie, R. C. Iotti, and F. Rossi, “Terahertz semiconductor-heterostructure laser,” Nature 417(6885), 156–159 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Over the past decade, QCL performance has steadily increased to give a far greater range of operating frequencies and higher operating temperatures. More recently, advanced functionalities have been investigated, including pulse amplification [10

N. Jukam, S. S. Dhillon, D. Oustinov, J. Madéo, C. Manquest, S. Barbieri, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and J. Tignon, “Terahertz amplifier based on gain switching in a quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Photonics 3(12), 715–719 (2009). [CrossRef]

], phase-control [11

D. Oustinov, N. Jukam, R. Rungsawang, J. Madéo, S. Barbieri, P. Filloux, C. Sirtori, X. Marcadet, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Phase seeding of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Commun. 1(6), 69 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 12

S. Barbieri, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, L. Ding, W. Maineult, C. Sirtori, R. Colombelli, H. Beere, and D. Ritchie, “Phase-locking of a 2.7 THz quantum cascade laser to a mode-locked erbium-doped fibre laser,” Nat. Photonics 4(9), 636–640 (2010). [CrossRef]

], and mode-locking [13

S. Barbieri, M. Ravaro, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, C. Manquest, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, and A. G. Davies, “Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis,” Nat. Photonics 5(5), 306–313 (2011). [CrossRef]

, 14

C. Y. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, V. M. Gkortsas, L. Diehl, F. X. Kärtner, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, X. Li, D. Ham, H. Schneider, P. Grant, C. Y. Song, S. Haffouz, Z. R. Wasilewski, H. C. Liu, and F. Capasso, “Mode-locked pulses from mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 17(15), 12929–12943 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] offering the possibility of using QCLs as a powerful and versatile source for time-domain spectroscopy (TDS). Only one realization of mode-locking has been reported in the terahertz spectral range, with an active scheme based on frequency feedback [13

S. Barbieri, M. Ravaro, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, C. Manquest, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, and A. G. Davies, “Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis,” Nat. Photonics 5(5), 306–313 (2011). [CrossRef]

] but, without direct control over the individual phases.

In the present work, thanks to the unprecedented control over the phase in the THz domain, we demonstrate a novel approach for mode-locking, where the phase of the laser longitudinal modes is directly imprinted using multimode injection seeding [11

D. Oustinov, N. Jukam, R. Rungsawang, J. Madéo, S. Barbieri, P. Filloux, C. Sirtori, X. Marcadet, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Phase seeding of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Commun. 1(6), 69 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We apply this technique to a 2.75THz quantum cascade laser (QCL), leading to the formation of 9ps THz laser pulses. The unique ability of Time Domain Spectroscopy [15

C. A. Schmuttenmaer, “Exploring dynamics in the far-infrared with terahertz spectroscopy,” Chem. Rev. 104(4), 1759–1780 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] (TDS) and coherent electro-optic detection [16

J. Kröll, J. Darmo, S. S. Dhillon, X. Marcadet, M. Calligaro, C. Sirtori, and K. Unterrainer, “Phase-resolved measurements of stimulated emission in a laser,” Nature 449(7163), 698–701 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 17

Q. Wu and X.-C. Zhang, “Free-space electro optic sampling of terahertz beams,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(24), 3523–3525 (1995). [CrossRef]

] to give access to both the amplitude and phase allows to fully characterize the locked phase relationship between the modes, as well as the initial transient laser dynamics.

2. Phase synchronization by multimode injection seeding

The principle of our experiment is schematically depicted in Fig. 2 and satisfies the two key requirements cited above. Firstly, we use a QCL with a 150GHz gain bandwidth, able to sustain about 11 lasing modes. Secondly, the phase of the QCL lasing modes is initially fixed by an external seed with a known phase rather than set randomly by the inherent spontaneous emission [11

D. Oustinov, N. Jukam, R. Rungsawang, J. Madéo, S. Barbieri, P. Filloux, C. Sirtori, X. Marcadet, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Phase seeding of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Commun. 1(6), 69 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For this, the QCL is switched-on periodically and synchronously injected with broadband phase-locked THz seed pulses that have a constant phase over the QCL gain bandwidth [15

C. A. Schmuttenmaer, “Exploring dynamics in the far-infrared with terahertz spectroscopy,” Chem. Rev. 104(4), 1759–1780 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This multimode injection seeding induces the formation of multiple longitudinal modes lasing with the fixed phase relationship of the seed. As a result, after a brief linear amplification regime, the gain is clamped to the losses, leading to the formation of a train of THz laser pulses with constant amplitude (Fig. 2(a)). Moreover, the QCL is periodically switched on and off, on a nanosecond timescale so that, as it will be demonstrated below, the dispersion remains negligible. This periodic switching is performed synchronously with the seeding, leading to a series of pulse trains, synchronized and phase-locked to each other.

Fig. 2 (a) Time domain: the QCL is gated at low frequency compared to the roundtrip time. When the laser is switched on, a seeding pulse is injected in the cavity with a field Eseed(t). After a brief transient regime, the laser gain g(t) is saturated and matches the losses, leading to an output field Eout(t) consisting in a constant amplitude laser pulse train. (b) Frequency domain: the terahertz seed pulses consist in a frequency comb with spacing frep and no frequency offset (green full lines). The free running QCL modes have linewidths smaller than frep (blue full lines) and a priori do not match the excitation comb frequencies. When the laser is gated for Tgate< 1/frep, lines are broadened up to 1/Tgate with overlap over several frequencies of the excitation comb (blue dashed lines). If the laser is gated periodically at frep frequency, an inner comb structure appears, with frep spacing and no frequency offset (red full lines). Each component of the periodically gated QCL spectrum is then excited by a component of the excitation terahertz frequency comb, imprinting its phase.

The periodic switching also plays an important role for the resonant injection of the QCL laser modes, as can be understood in the frequency domain (Fig. 2(b)). The seed field consists in a series of identical THz pulses with a repetition rate frep (76MHz). As a result, the seed spectrum is a frequency comb, with spacing frep (Fig. 2(c), green lines) and no frequency offset since the carrier phase shift is null [5

T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The free-running QCL spectrum displays several modes, spaced by the FSR, with a linewidth in the MHz range [18

A. Barkan, F. K. Tittel, D. M. Mittleman, R. Dengler, P. H. Siegel, G. Scalari, L. Ajili, J. Faist, H. E. Beere, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and D. A. Ritchie, “Linewidth and tuning characteristics of terahertz quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Lett. 29(6), 575–577 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] (blue solid lines). Consequently, the seed pulse frequency components are a priori not resonant with the free-running QCL modes. However, when the QCL is turned-on for a time Tgate<1/frep, each QCL mode broadens to a linewidth Tgate (blue dashed lines), larger than the excitation comb frequency spacing. Last, since the QCL is periodically turned-on with a gate synchronized to seeding pulses, the spectrum of the broadened QCL is structured into a comb with spacing frep and no frequency offset (red lines). Therefore each component of the periodically gated QCL spectrum is resonantly excited by a component of the seeding terahertz frequency comb, imprinting its own phase and permitting multi-mode injection seeding.

3. Experimental setup

A schematic diagram of the experiment is shown in Fig. 3 . To produce stable pulse in time by mode-locking, the gain recovery time (typically 50ps in THz QCLs) has to be longer than the cavity round trip time [19

R. P. Green, A. Tredicucci, N. Q. Vinh, B. Murdin, C. Pidgeon, H. E. Beere, and D. A. Ritchie, “Gain recovery dynamics of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Phys. Rev. B 80(7), 075303 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Thus, the laser cavity has to be short enough to ensure this condition is satisfied, but also long enough to obtain several lasing modes. As a compromise, the QCL is cleaved to a length of 1.5mm which provides a round trip time of 35ps and a mode spacing of 29GHz. The QCL is an AlGaAs/GaAs bound-to-continuum design with a plasmon waveguide that lases at 2.75THz with a 150GHz bandwidth, and typically ~20mW output power in free running operation. It is soldered with indium onto a copper heat sink which is maintained at a temperature of 10K. An upper limit of the GVD was estimated to be 4∙10−2 ps2/mm at 3THz. Thus, a gaussian pulse of 10ps FWHM broadens by one cycle (333fs) only after 3ns of propagation. Consequently, the QCL is switched-on for less than 1ns to avoid any dispersion effects.

Fig. 3 (a) The seed THz pulses are produced by illuminating an interdigited photo-conductive antenna with near infrared femtosecond laser pulses. After a THz seed pulse enters the QCL, a square RF pulse synchronized to the femtosecond laser pulse biases the QCL above lasing threshold. The THz beam emitted and a split-off beam from the femtosecond beam are then focused onto a ZnTe crystal for the electro-optic sampling detection. (b) Detection of the emitted field, with a quarter wave electro-optic sampling geometry. The signal is proportional to the amplitude of THz field emitted by the QCL.

A RF signal consisting of 1ns long square pulses with a period of 13ns is generated by illuminating a photodiode with a Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser, with pulse duration of typically 100fs and a repetition rate of 76MHz. This periodically biases the QCL above lasing threshold [11

D. Oustinov, N. Jukam, R. Rungsawang, J. Madéo, S. Barbieri, P. Filloux, C. Sirtori, X. Marcadet, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Phase seeding of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Commun. 1(6), 69 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], when added to a quasi-DC bias (25% duty cycle at kHz frequencies) with a bias tee. The RF pulse rise time is typically 400ps with duration of 600ps; the laser turn-on is determined by the rise time of the RF pulse. A 50Ω RF switch modulates this bias for lock-in detection.

The THz seed pulses are generated with a photo-conductive antenna [20

J. Madéo, N. Jukam, D. Oustinov, M. Rosticher, R. Rungsawang, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Frequency tunable terahertz interdigitated photoconductive antennas,” Electron. Lett. 46(9), 611–613 (2010). [CrossRef]

, 21

A. Dreyhaupt, S. Winnerl, T. Dekorsy, and M. Helm, “High-intensity terahertz radiation from a microstructured large-area photoconductor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86(12), 121114 (2005). [CrossRef]

], excited by the same laser, and are coupled into the facet of the QCL with parabolic mirrors (not shown). An electronic delay on the RF pulse permits synchronization with the seeding pulse. The value of the quasi-DC bias applied on the laser is not critical to achieve the injection seeding. The antenna is biased periodically at frequency 2f with a constant polarity. The QCL is modulated at frequency f = 10kHz, while the lock-in reference is f, so that in this configuration only the field emitted by the QCL is detected. The THz beam emitted and a split-off beam from the femtosecond beam are then focused onto a 200µm ZnTe crystal for the electro-optic sampling detection [17

Q. Wu and X.-C. Zhang, “Free-space electro optic sampling of terahertz beams,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(24), 3523–3525 (1995). [CrossRef]

] (Fig. 3(b)): the THz electric field induces a small birefringence and a polarization rotation of the femtosecond beam, measured in a balanced photodiode scheme. It results in a direct measurement of the field amplitude and phase, including any transient dynamics.

4. Results

Figure 4(a) shows the amplitude of electrical field E(t) emitted by the QCL, and demonstrates unambiguously the formation of ultrashort THz laser pulses. At early times (t<300ps), the frequency components of the seed pulse corresponding to the QCL gain bandwidth are amplified, while the rest undergo losses and rapidly vanish, resulting in a spectral narrowing (blue squares in Fig. 4(c)). In the time domain, this results in pulse width broadening (red circles in Fig. 4(c)). After this transient regime of about 300ps, a quasi-constant amplitude train of pulses is clearly visible, with a FWHM of about 9ps in intensity, as illustrated more clearly by Fig. 4(b) which shows the square of the electric field E2(t). Figure 4(d) shows the spectrum obtained by Fourier transform of the signal measured in the steady state region (red curve). It is obtained by weighting the signal with a hamming window of 500ps centered at t0 = 550ps, and the FFT routine of MATLAB is used to compute the spectrum. It consists of an ensemble of discrete modes, equally spaced by the QCL FSR (29GHz). The resolution of the measurement is limited by the length of the mechanical delay line (800ps) that does not allow the resolution of the underlying QCL frequency comb discussed above. The spectrum of the free-running QCL (i.e. without seeding and RF modulation), which cannot be determined using electro-optic sampling, was measured with a commercial FTIR and is also shown in Fig. 4(d) (resolution limited). While the center frequencies have similar relative amplitudes, the spectrum of the injected QCL presents additional lasing side-modes, interpreted as a signature of mode-locking [14

C. Y. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, V. M. Gkortsas, L. Diehl, F. X. Kärtner, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, X. Li, D. Ham, H. Schneider, P. Grant, C. Y. Song, S. Haffouz, Z. R. Wasilewski, H. C. Liu, and F. Capasso, “Mode-locked pulses from mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 17(15), 12929–12943 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Fig. 4 a) Amplitude and phase resolved measurements of the emitted electric field, for a THz seed pulse generated with 4V applied to the photo-conductive antenna. A DC bias of 120A/cm2 and 7.5W RF pulse is applied to the QCL, equivalent to adding around 129A/cm2. The laser threshold is 167A/cm2. The seeding pulse is injected in the QCL at t = −24ps. Inset: expanded view of the TDS measurement between t = 526ps and t = 528ps. b) Instantaneous emitted intensity, calculated from the TDS field measurement. A train of pulses, separated by the cavity round trip (35ps), is clearly visible, with a FWHM of 9ps in intensity. c) Pulse width (blue square, right axis) and spectrum width (red circle, left axis) as a function of the number of round trips in the QCL. d) Fourier transform of the measured electrical field in the steady state regime. Several modes are visible, separated by the cavity free spectral range (29GHz). A spectrum of the free running QCL, obtained by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), has been superimposed. Both are renormalized to their maximum value and are resolution limited.

The spectral phase of the field can be obtained from the argument of the complex spectrum at the corresponding frequency, but for a window of 400ps only, centered at t0 = 550ps. Error bars are estimated by measuring the phase with the same procedure but for different values of t0 from 500ps to 600ps. Then, the phase of each mode can be extracted (Fig. 5(a) , blue dots) and compared to the spectral phase of the seeding pulse (Fig. 5(a), green line). They are measured to be almost identical within the error bars. This clearly demonstrates that (i) there is a fixed phase relationship between all the modes, imprinted by the seeding, and (ii) the phase difference between the modes is constant, providing optimal contrast for the interference and hence Fourier-transform limited pulses [6

T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72(2), 545–591 (2000). [CrossRef]

]. As a last demonstration of the completeness of the measurement, we show in Fig. 5(b) the field calculated from the measured amplitudes and phases (t>300ps), showing excellent agreement with the measured field (Fig. 4(a)). The dependence of mode-locking on quasi-DC point of the laser has been investigated, but no clear behavior has been observed.

Fig. 5 (a) The phase of each laser mode (in blue) is obtained from the argument of the complex FFT of the field measured in the steady state region (t>300ps). Similarly, a measurement of the seeding pulse field provide after FFT the spectral phase of the seeding pulse (green line). In the inset, an expanded view for clarity, around the laser modes’ frequencies, showing unambiguously that the phases are identical. The spectral phase of the seeding pulse has negligible variation over the frequency bandwidth of the laser (2π × 6∙10−3 rad standard deviation). (b) Reconstructed field from the measured amplitudes and phases.

5. Conclusion and outlook

In this current work, 9ps THz pulses are generated, limited by the number of modes i.e. the spectral gain of the laser. A longer cavity would increase the number of modes leading to shorter pulses, but it would also increase the cavity round trip time, so that the mode-locked solution might not be stable. However, in order to obtain shorter pulses, it would be very interesting to use broadband QCLs that have shown bandwidths greater than 1THz [22

D. Turčinková, G. Scalari, F. Castellano, M. I. Amanti, M. Beck, and J. Faist, “Ultra-broadband heterogeneous quantum cascade laser emitting from 2.2 to 3.2 THz,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(19), 191104 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. Further, new THz phase-modulation techniques [23

H.-T. Chen, W. J. Padilla, M. J. Cich, A. K. Azad, R. D. Averitt, and A. J. Taylor, “A metamaterial solid-state terahertz phase modulator,” Nat. Photonics 3(3), 148–151 (2009). [CrossRef]

] could be used to finely adjust the individual phases of the mode phases with on-demand values. This would provide an integrated pulse shaper, whereas in optics, pulse shaping is a subsequent [24

W. S. Warren, H. Rabitz, and M. Dahleh, “Coherent control of quantum dynamics - the dream is alive,” Science 259(5101), 1581–1589 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In conclusion, we have shown that mode-locking can be achieved by directly imprinting the desired phase relationship onto the laser modes of a THz QCL by multimode phase-locked injection seeding, directly characterized with phase resolved electro-optic detection. By increasing the pulse duration of the RF signal used to switch on the QCL, one could perform experimental investigations of pulse formation dynamics and stability in QCLs [25

C. Y. Wang, L. Diehl, A. Gordon, C. Jirauschek, F. X. Kärtner, A. Belyanin, D. Bour, S. Corzine, G. Höfler, M. Troccoli, J. Faist, and F. Capasso, “Coherent instabilities in a semiconductor laser with fast gain recovery,” Phys. Rev. A 75(3), 031802 (2007). [CrossRef]

–28

V. M. Gkortsas, C. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, L. Diehl, A. Gordon, C. Jirauschek, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, F. Capasso, and F. X. Kärtner, “Dynamics of actively mode-locked quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 18(13), 13616–13630 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and ultimately the generation of ultrashort and intense THz pulses. Such devices would also be powerful tools for use in THz-TDS, molecular spectroscopy or coherent control with phase-shaped pulses [24

W. S. Warren, H. Rabitz, and M. Dahleh, “Coherent control of quantum dynamics - the dream is alive,” Science 259(5101), 1581–1589 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 29

Y. Silberberg, “Quantum coherent control for nonlinear spectroscopy and microscopy,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60(1), 277–292 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Acknowledgments

We thank Louis-Anne de Vaulchier and François-Régis Jasnot, who performed the FTIR measurement. We acknowledge funding from ANR (FR), EPSRC (UK), and European Research Council grants “TOSCA” and “NOTES”.

References and links

1.

L. E. Hargrove, R. L. Fork, and M. A. Pollack, “Locking of He-Ne laser modes induces by synchronous intracavity modulation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 5(1), 4–5 (1964). [CrossRef]

2.

E. P. Ippen, C. V. Shank, and A. Dienes, “Passive mode locking of the cw dye laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 21(8), 348–350 (1972). [CrossRef]

3.

A. J. DeMaria, D. A. Stetser, and H. Heynau, “Self mode-locking of lasers with saturable absorbers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 8(7), 174–176 (1966). [CrossRef]

4.

U. Keller, “Recent Developments in compact ultrafast lasers,” Nature 424(6950), 831–838 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72(2), 545–591 (2000). [CrossRef]

7.

D. Mittleman, Sensing with Terahertz Radiation (Springer, 2002).

8.

M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007). [CrossRef]

9.

R. Köhler, A. Tredicucci, F. Beltram, H. E. Beere, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, D. A. Ritchie, R. C. Iotti, and F. Rossi, “Terahertz semiconductor-heterostructure laser,” Nature 417(6885), 156–159 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

N. Jukam, S. S. Dhillon, D. Oustinov, J. Madéo, C. Manquest, S. Barbieri, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and J. Tignon, “Terahertz amplifier based on gain switching in a quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Photonics 3(12), 715–719 (2009). [CrossRef]

11.

D. Oustinov, N. Jukam, R. Rungsawang, J. Madéo, S. Barbieri, P. Filloux, C. Sirtori, X. Marcadet, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Phase seeding of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Commun. 1(6), 69 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

S. Barbieri, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, L. Ding, W. Maineult, C. Sirtori, R. Colombelli, H. Beere, and D. Ritchie, “Phase-locking of a 2.7 THz quantum cascade laser to a mode-locked erbium-doped fibre laser,” Nat. Photonics 4(9), 636–640 (2010). [CrossRef]

13.

S. Barbieri, M. Ravaro, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, C. Manquest, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, and A. G. Davies, “Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis,” Nat. Photonics 5(5), 306–313 (2011). [CrossRef]

14.

C. Y. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, V. M. Gkortsas, L. Diehl, F. X. Kärtner, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, X. Li, D. Ham, H. Schneider, P. Grant, C. Y. Song, S. Haffouz, Z. R. Wasilewski, H. C. Liu, and F. Capasso, “Mode-locked pulses from mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 17(15), 12929–12943 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

C. A. Schmuttenmaer, “Exploring dynamics in the far-infrared with terahertz spectroscopy,” Chem. Rev. 104(4), 1759–1780 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

J. Kröll, J. Darmo, S. S. Dhillon, X. Marcadet, M. Calligaro, C. Sirtori, and K. Unterrainer, “Phase-resolved measurements of stimulated emission in a laser,” Nature 449(7163), 698–701 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

Q. Wu and X.-C. Zhang, “Free-space electro optic sampling of terahertz beams,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(24), 3523–3525 (1995). [CrossRef]

18.

A. Barkan, F. K. Tittel, D. M. Mittleman, R. Dengler, P. H. Siegel, G. Scalari, L. Ajili, J. Faist, H. E. Beere, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and D. A. Ritchie, “Linewidth and tuning characteristics of terahertz quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Lett. 29(6), 575–577 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

R. P. Green, A. Tredicucci, N. Q. Vinh, B. Murdin, C. Pidgeon, H. E. Beere, and D. A. Ritchie, “Gain recovery dynamics of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Phys. Rev. B 80(7), 075303 (2009). [CrossRef]

20.

J. Madéo, N. Jukam, D. Oustinov, M. Rosticher, R. Rungsawang, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Frequency tunable terahertz interdigitated photoconductive antennas,” Electron. Lett. 46(9), 611–613 (2010). [CrossRef]

21.

A. Dreyhaupt, S. Winnerl, T. Dekorsy, and M. Helm, “High-intensity terahertz radiation from a microstructured large-area photoconductor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86(12), 121114 (2005). [CrossRef]

22.

D. Turčinková, G. Scalari, F. Castellano, M. I. Amanti, M. Beck, and J. Faist, “Ultra-broadband heterogeneous quantum cascade laser emitting from 2.2 to 3.2 THz,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(19), 191104 (2011). [CrossRef]

23.

H.-T. Chen, W. J. Padilla, M. J. Cich, A. K. Azad, R. D. Averitt, and A. J. Taylor, “A metamaterial solid-state terahertz phase modulator,” Nat. Photonics 3(3), 148–151 (2009). [CrossRef]

24.

W. S. Warren, H. Rabitz, and M. Dahleh, “Coherent control of quantum dynamics - the dream is alive,” Science 259(5101), 1581–1589 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

C. Y. Wang, L. Diehl, A. Gordon, C. Jirauschek, F. X. Kärtner, A. Belyanin, D. Bour, S. Corzine, G. Höfler, M. Troccoli, J. Faist, and F. Capasso, “Coherent instabilities in a semiconductor laser with fast gain recovery,” Phys. Rev. A 75(3), 031802 (2007). [CrossRef]

26.

A. Gordon, C. Y. Wang, L. Diehl, F. X. Kärtner, A. Belyanin, D. Bour, S. Corzine, G. Höfler, H. C. Liu, H. Schneider, T. Maier, M. Troccoli, J. Faist, and F. Capasso, “Multimode regimes in quantum cascade lasers: From coherent instabilities to spatial hole burning,” Phys. Rev. A 77(5), 053804 (2008). [CrossRef]

27.

H. Choi, L. Diehl, Z.-K. Wu, M. Giovannini, J. Faist, F. Capasso, and T. B. Norris, “Gain recovery dynamics and photon-driven transport in quantum cascade lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(16), 167401 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28.

V. M. Gkortsas, C. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, L. Diehl, A. Gordon, C. Jirauschek, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, F. Capasso, and F. X. Kärtner, “Dynamics of actively mode-locked quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express 18(13), 13616–13630 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29.

Y. Silberberg, “Quantum coherent control for nonlinear spectroscopy and microscopy,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60(1), 277–292 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(140.3520) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, injection-locked
(140.4050) Lasers and laser optics : Mode-locked lasers
(140.5965) Lasers and laser optics : Semiconductor lasers, quantum cascade
(300.6495) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy, teraherz

ToC Category:
Lasers and Laser Optics

History
Original Manuscript: May 8, 2012
Revised Manuscript: July 19, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: July 20, 2012
Published: August 28, 2012

Citation
J. Maysonnave, K. Maussang, J. R. Freeman, N. Jukam, J. Madéo, P. Cavalié, R. Rungsawang, S.P. Khanna, E.H. Linfield, A.G. Davies, H.E. Beere, D.A. Ritchie, S.S. Dhillon, and J. Tignon, "Mode-locking of a terahertz laser by direct phase synchronization," Opt. Express 20, 20855-20862 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-19-20855


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. L. E. Hargrove, R. L. Fork, and M. A. Pollack, “Locking of He-Ne laser modes induces by synchronous intracavity modulation,” Appl. Phys. Lett.5(1), 4–5 (1964). [CrossRef]
  2. E. P. Ippen, C. V. Shank, and A. Dienes, “Passive mode locking of the cw dye laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.21(8), 348–350 (1972). [CrossRef]
  3. A. J. DeMaria, D. A. Stetser, and H. Heynau, “Self mode-locking of lasers with saturable absorbers,” Appl. Phys. Lett.8(7), 174–176 (1966). [CrossRef]
  4. U. Keller, “Recent Developments in compact ultrafast lasers,” Nature424(6950), 831–838 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.72(2), 545–591 (2000). [CrossRef]
  7. D. Mittleman, Sensing with Terahertz Radiation (Springer, 2002).
  8. M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics1(2), 97–105 (2007). [CrossRef]
  9. R. Köhler, A. Tredicucci, F. Beltram, H. E. Beere, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, D. A. Ritchie, R. C. Iotti, and F. Rossi, “Terahertz semiconductor-heterostructure laser,” Nature417(6885), 156–159 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. N. Jukam, S. S. Dhillon, D. Oustinov, J. Madéo, C. Manquest, S. Barbieri, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and J. Tignon, “Terahertz amplifier based on gain switching in a quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Photonics3(12), 715–719 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. D. Oustinov, N. Jukam, R. Rungsawang, J. Madéo, S. Barbieri, P. Filloux, C. Sirtori, X. Marcadet, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Phase seeding of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Commun.1(6), 69 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. S. Barbieri, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, L. Ding, W. Maineult, C. Sirtori, R. Colombelli, H. Beere, and D. Ritchie, “Phase-locking of a 2.7 THz quantum cascade laser to a mode-locked erbium-doped fibre laser,” Nat. Photonics4(9), 636–640 (2010). [CrossRef]
  13. S. Barbieri, M. Ravaro, P. Gellie, G. Santarelli, C. Manquest, C. Sirtori, S. P. Khanna, E. H. Linfield, and A. G. Davies, “Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis,” Nat. Photonics5(5), 306–313 (2011). [CrossRef]
  14. C. Y. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, V. M. Gkortsas, L. Diehl, F. X. Kärtner, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, X. Li, D. Ham, H. Schneider, P. Grant, C. Y. Song, S. Haffouz, Z. R. Wasilewski, H. C. Liu, and F. Capasso, “Mode-locked pulses from mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express17(15), 12929–12943 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. C. A. Schmuttenmaer, “Exploring dynamics in the far-infrared with terahertz spectroscopy,” Chem. Rev.104(4), 1759–1780 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. J. Kröll, J. Darmo, S. S. Dhillon, X. Marcadet, M. Calligaro, C. Sirtori, and K. Unterrainer, “Phase-resolved measurements of stimulated emission in a laser,” Nature449(7163), 698–701 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Q. Wu and X.-C. Zhang, “Free-space electro optic sampling of terahertz beams,” Appl. Phys. Lett.67(24), 3523–3525 (1995). [CrossRef]
  18. A. Barkan, F. K. Tittel, D. M. Mittleman, R. Dengler, P. H. Siegel, G. Scalari, L. Ajili, J. Faist, H. E. Beere, E. H. Linfield, A. G. Davies, and D. A. Ritchie, “Linewidth and tuning characteristics of terahertz quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Lett.29(6), 575–577 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. R. P. Green, A. Tredicucci, N. Q. Vinh, B. Murdin, C. Pidgeon, H. E. Beere, and D. A. Ritchie, “Gain recovery dynamics of a terahertz quantum cascade laser,” Phys. Rev. B80(7), 075303 (2009). [CrossRef]
  20. J. Madéo, N. Jukam, D. Oustinov, M. Rosticher, R. Rungsawang, J. Tignon, and S. S. Dhillon, “Frequency tunable terahertz interdigitated photoconductive antennas,” Electron. Lett.46(9), 611–613 (2010). [CrossRef]
  21. A. Dreyhaupt, S. Winnerl, T. Dekorsy, and M. Helm, “High-intensity terahertz radiation from a microstructured large-area photoconductor,” Appl. Phys. Lett.86(12), 121114 (2005). [CrossRef]
  22. D. Turčinková, G. Scalari, F. Castellano, M. I. Amanti, M. Beck, and J. Faist, “Ultra-broadband heterogeneous quantum cascade laser emitting from 2.2 to 3.2 THz,” Appl. Phys. Lett.99(19), 191104 (2011). [CrossRef]
  23. H.-T. Chen, W. J. Padilla, M. J. Cich, A. K. Azad, R. D. Averitt, and A. J. Taylor, “A metamaterial solid-state terahertz phase modulator,” Nat. Photonics3(3), 148–151 (2009). [CrossRef]
  24. W. S. Warren, H. Rabitz, and M. Dahleh, “Coherent control of quantum dynamics - the dream is alive,” Science259(5101), 1581–1589 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. C. Y. Wang, L. Diehl, A. Gordon, C. Jirauschek, F. X. Kärtner, A. Belyanin, D. Bour, S. Corzine, G. Höfler, M. Troccoli, J. Faist, and F. Capasso, “Coherent instabilities in a semiconductor laser with fast gain recovery,” Phys. Rev. A75(3), 031802 (2007). [CrossRef]
  26. A. Gordon, C. Y. Wang, L. Diehl, F. X. Kärtner, A. Belyanin, D. Bour, S. Corzine, G. Höfler, H. C. Liu, H. Schneider, T. Maier, M. Troccoli, J. Faist, and F. Capasso, “Multimode regimes in quantum cascade lasers: From coherent instabilities to spatial hole burning,” Phys. Rev. A77(5), 053804 (2008). [CrossRef]
  27. H. Choi, L. Diehl, Z.-K. Wu, M. Giovannini, J. Faist, F. Capasso, and T. B. Norris, “Gain recovery dynamics and photon-driven transport in quantum cascade lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100(16), 167401 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. V. M. Gkortsas, C. Wang, L. Kuznetsova, L. Diehl, A. Gordon, C. Jirauschek, M. A. Belkin, A. Belyanin, F. Capasso, and F. X. Kärtner, “Dynamics of actively mode-locked quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express18(13), 13616–13630 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Y. Silberberg, “Quantum coherent control for nonlinear spectroscopy and microscopy,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.60(1), 277–292 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

 Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited