Electrically controlling spin and orbital angular momentum of a focused light beam in a uniaxial crystal

doi:10.1364/OE.20.025876

« Show journal navigation

Electrically controlling spin and orbital angular momentum of a focused light beam in a uniaxial crystal

Wenguo Zhu and Weilong She »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 23, pp. 25876-25883 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.025876

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1396 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theory
3. The electric control of local and global angular momentum of the output beam
4. The electric control of local and global angular momentum of the light beam after SBN and QWP
5. Conclusion
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (28)
Cited By
Figures (4)
Metrics

Abstract

We propose a method for controlling the local spin and orbital angular momentum (SAM and OAM) of a focused light beam in a uniaxial crystal by means of Pockels effect. For an input circularly polarized Bessel-Gaussian (BG) beam, both the local SAM and OAM of the output beam are circularly symmetric, their patterns and peak values vary with the applied electric field E₀. Let the output beam pass through a quarter-wave plate, the OAM keeps while the SAM varies. The local SAM density is nearly directly proportional to ± sin(2φ), where φ is the azimuthal angle and the signs are dependent on the radius and E₀.

1. Introduction

It is well known that light carries spin and orbital angular momenta [1

L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A 45(11), 8185–8189 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Orbital angular momentum (OAM) arises from the spatial profile of light intensity and the phase, while spin angular momentum (SAM) associates with circular polarization [1

]. Recently, angular momentum has attracted considerable attention owing to its applications including optical manipulation [2

H. He, M. E. Friese, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(5), 826–829 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–4

A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, “Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 3(2), 161–204 (2011) (and references therein). [CrossRef]

], quantum information [5

A. Vaziri, J. W. Pan, T. Jennewein, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: Qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(22), 227902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and biosciences [6

L. Paterson, M. P. MacDonald, J. Arlt, W. Sibbett, P. E. Bryant, and K. Dholakia, “Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles,” Science 292(5518), 912–914 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

R. Dasgupta, S. Ahlawat, R. S. Verma, and P. K. Gupta, “Optical orientation and rotation of trapped red blood cells with Laguerre-Gaussian mode,” Opt. Express 19(8), 7680–7688 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The global angular momentum (the average value over the section of beam) plays an important role in these applications when the whole beam is taken into account. The local angular momentum, on the contrary, is important for the experiments accessing only portions of beam [8

R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Angular momentum of multimode and polarization patterns,” Opt. Express 15(23), 15214–15227 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. As demonstrated by Garcés-Chávez and associates, SAM (or OAM) transferred to a small particle in a big beam is proportional to the local SAM (or OAM) instead of the global one [9

V. Garcés-Chávez, D. McGloin, M. J. Padgett, W. Dultz, H. Schmitzer, and K. Dholakia, “Observation of the transfer of the local angular momentum density of a multi-ringed light beam to an optically trapped particle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(9), 093602 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. They further found that a high-index particle trapped off-axis can rotate around the beam axis in the opposite direction to the beam helicity under appropriate conditions [10

K. Volke-Sepulveda, S. Chávez-Cerda, V. Garcés-Chávez, and K. Dholakia, “Three-dimensional optical forces and transfer of orbital angular momentum from multiringed light beams to spherical microparticles,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1749–1757 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Although the management of the global SAM (or OAM) is relatively straightforward [11

L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, “Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(16), 163905 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the control of the local SAM (or OAM) density is much more complex. The interference of several vortex modes and the superposition of two orthogonal linearly polarized beams are two of the common methods of this control [8

R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Angular momentum of multimode and polarization patterns,” Opt. Express 15(23), 15214–15227 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,12

Z. Bouchal, V. Kollarova, P. Zemanek, and T. Cizmar, “Orbital angular momentum of mixed vortex beams,” Proc. SPIE 6609, 660907, 660907-8 (2007). [CrossRef]

,13

I. A. Litvin, A. Dudley, and A. Forbes, “Poynting vector and orbital angular momentum density of superpositions of Bessel beams,” Opt. Express 19(18), 16760–16771 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. By changing topological charges and relative amplitudes of the light beams, various SAM and OAM density patterns can be obtained [14

S. H. Tao, X. C. Yuan, J. Lin, and R. E. Burge, “Residue orbital angular momentum in interferenced double vortex beams with unequal topological charges,” Opt. Express 14(2), 535–541 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, these methods are not suitable for rapid control, which may be useful in optical manipulation [15

C. H. J. Schmitz, K. Uhrig, J. P. Spatz, and J. E. Curtis, “Tuning the orbital angular momentum in optical vortex beams,” Opt. Express 14(15), 6604–6612 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

In this paper, we introduce a simple method to control the local SAM and OAM in a single uniaxial crystal with Pockels effect. This kind of crystal is well known for its wide use in the generation of optical singularity [16

E. Brasselet, Y. Izdebskaya, V. Shvedov, A. S. Desyatnikov, W. Krolikowski, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dynamics of optical spin-orbit coupling in uniaxial crystals,” Opt. Lett. 34(7), 1021–1023 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–18

C. Loussert and E. Brasselet, “Efficient scalar and vectorial singular beam shaping using homogeneous anisotropic media,” Opt. Lett. 35(1), 7–9 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and mode conversion of light beam [19

N. A. Khilo, E. S. Petrova, and A. A. Ryzhevich, “Transformation of the order of Bessel light beams in uniaxial crystals,” Quantum Electron. 31(1), 85–89 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. Very recently, we utilized the crystal to generate and control high order multiring modes [20

W. Zhu and W. She, “Electro-optically generating and controlling right- and left-handed circularly polarized multiring modes of light beams,” Opt. Lett. 37(14), 2823–2825 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. When a circularly polarized rotationally symmetric beam propagates along the optical axis of the crystal, SAM will transfer to OAM, but the total angular momentum conserves [21

A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Angular momentum dynamics of a paraxial beam in a uniaxial crystal,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 67(3), 036618 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. As illustrated by Chen, with a dc electric field applied on the crystal, the conversion between SAM and OAM is electrically controllable [22

L. Chen and W. She, “Electro-optically forbidden or enhanced spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in a focused light beam,” Opt. Lett. 33(7), 696–698 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Here, both the local and global properties of SAM and OAM of the output light beam are studied in detail and their variations with the applied electric field are demonstrated.

2. Theory

Suppose that a focused vectorial beam of 632.8 nm propagates along the optical axis of a uniaxial crystal strontium barium niobate (SBN), which has a large electro-optical coefficient γ₃₃ = 1340 pm/V [23

A. Yariv, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, 1983).

], and a dc electric field is applied along the same direction. Following [20

], the wave equation is

\nabla^{2} E (r) - \nabla [\nabla \cdot E (r)] + k_{0}^{2} {\overset{\leftrightarrow}{ε}}^{e f f} E (r) = 0.

(1)

The contribution of Pockels effect is included in the effective permittivity tensor

{\overset{\leftrightarrow}{ε}}^{e f f} =

d i a g (ε_{o}^{e f f}, ε_{o}^{e f f}, ε_{e}^{e f f})

, where

ε_{o}^{e f f} = ε_{o} (1 - ε_{o} γ_{13} E_{0})

and

ε_{e}^{e f f} = ε_{e} (1 - ε_{e} γ_{33} E_{0})

with ε_o and ε_e being the permittivity of ordinary and extraordinary waves in the uniaxial crystal, respectively. It has been previously shown that, a circularly polarized Gaussian beam propagating along the optical axis of a uniaxial crystal has low conversion efficiency from SAM to OAM (lower than 50%) [24

A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Circularly polarized beams and vortex generation in uniaxial media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(1), 163–171 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In contrast, the experiment showed that a Bessel-Gaussian (BG)-like beam can obtain efficiency near 100% [18

C. Loussert and E. Brasselet, “Efficient scalar and vectorial singular beam shaping using homogeneous anisotropic media,” Opt. Lett. 35(1), 7–9 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. BG beams can also obtain high conversion efficiency [25

T. A. Fadeyeva and A. V. Volyar, “Extreme spin-orbit coupling in crystal-travelling paraxial beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(3), 381–389 (2010). [CrossRef]

], for example 99.61% as shown below. So, we choose BG beams for our investigation. For a m-order right-handed circularly polarized paraxial BG beam, its field at the incident surface of SBN crystal (z = 0) is

E_{i n ⊥} (r, φ, 0) = J_{m} (β r) \exp (- r^{2} / w_{0}^{2})

_{$\exp (- i m φ) (X + i Y) / \sqrt{2}$}, where β and w₀ are the transverse component of wave-number and beam waist, respectively_. Following the method proposed in [25

T. A. Fadeyeva and A. V. Volyar, “Extreme spin-orbit coupling in crystal-travelling paraxial beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(3), 381–389 (2010). [CrossRef]

], the right- and left-handed circularly polarized (RHP and LHP) components of output light field can be expressed as

\begin{matrix} E_{+} (r, φ, z) = \frac{1}{2} \exp (- \frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{4} - i m φ) [\frac{1}{σ_{o}} J_{m} (\frac{β r}{σ_{o}}) \exp (- \frac{r^{2}}{w_{0}^{2} σ_{o}} + \frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{4 σ_{o}}) \\ + \frac{1}{σ_{e}} J_{m} (\frac{β r}{σ_{e}}) \exp (- \frac{r^{2}}{w_{0}^{2} σ_{e}} + \frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{4 σ_{e}})], \end{matrix}

(2a)

\begin{matrix} E_{-} (r, φ, z) = \frac{1}{2} {(\frac{β w_{0}}{2})}^{m} {(\frac{r}{w_{0}})}^{m - 2} \exp [- \frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{4} - i (m - 2) φ] \times \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{n + 1}{(n + m)!} {(\frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{4})}^{n} \\ [\frac{1}{σ_{o}^{n + m - 2}} \exp (- \frac{r^{2}}{w_{0}^{2} σ_{o}}) L_{n + 1}^{m - 2} (\frac{r^{2}}{w_{0}^{2} σ_{o}}) - \frac{1}{σ_{e}^{n + m - 2}} \exp (- \frac{r^{2}}{w_{0}^{2} σ_{e}}) L_{n + 1}^{m - 2} (\frac{r^{2}}{w_{0}^{2} σ_{e}})], \end{matrix}

(2b)

where

σ_{o (e)} = 1 - i z / z_{o (e)}

with

z_{o} = k_{0} w_{0}^{2} \sqrt{ε_{o}^{e f f}}

and

z_{e} = k_{0} w_{0}^{2} ε_{e}^{e f f} / \sqrt{ε_{o}^{e f f}}

. It should be noticed that the RHP and LHP components of the output light field all depend on the applied electric field since

ε_{o}^{e f f}

and

ε_{e}^{e f f}

depend on the applied electric field. When β = 0 and m = 0, Eqs. (2a) and (2b) reduce to that describing the propagation of Gaussian beam through a uniaxial crystal. They also describe the propagation of non-diffracting Bessel beam when w₀→∞.

The angular momentum of a light beam is given by the sum of spin and orbital contributions in paraxial regime. If a particle is held off-axis, SAM results in the rotation of the particle around its own axis, while OAM causes the rotation around the beam axis. SAM and OAM are mechanically equivalent for the particle held on the beam axis, where the center of the particle cannot move [26

R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Local transfer of angular momentum to matter,” J. Mod. Opt. 52, 1045–1052 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. The cross product of radius vector r and linear momentum density P gives the angular momentum density. And the angular momentum density in the propagation direction is j_z = l_z + s_z, with [8

R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Angular momentum of multimode and polarization patterns,” Opt. Express 15(23), 15214–15227 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]

l_{z} = \frac{ε_{0}}{2 ω} Im (E_{x}^{*} \partial_{φ} E_{x} + E_{y}^{*} \partial_{φ} E_{y}),

(3a)

s_{z} = \frac{ε_{0}}{ω} Im (E_{x}^{*} E_{y}) = \frac{ε_{0}}{ω} S_{3},

(3b)

where S₃ is the Stokes parameter, E_x and E_y are the light field components along two orthogonal directions. By the relations

E_{x} = (E_{+} + E_{-}) / \sqrt{2}

and E_{y $= i (E_{+} - E_{-}) / \sqrt{2}$}, we get l_z = -ε₀/(2w) [m|A₁(r,z)|² + (m-2)|A₂(r,z)|²], s_z = ε₀/(2w) [|A₁(r,z)|²-|A₂(r,z)|²], where A₁(r,z) and A₂(r,z) are the azimuthal independent parts of E₊(r,φ,z) and E_-(r,φ,z) in Eqs. (2a) and (2b), respectively. The output local SAM and OAM densities rely on the local intensities of RHP and LHP components of the output beam. This can be easily understood by taking the output beam as a superposition of two circularly polarized waves, then performing an addition of their OAM but a subtraction between their SAM [8

R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Angular momentum of multimode and polarization patterns,” Opt. Express 15(23), 15214–15227 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The average SAM (or OAM) is obtained by integrating the SAM (or OAM) density over the whole cross section of the beam. However, it is not an easy work. A much simple method for calculating the average SAM per photon in the uniaxial crystal is proposed in [25

T. A. Fadeyeva and A. V. Volyar, “Extreme spin-orbit coupling in crystal-travelling paraxial beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(3), 381–389 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. For a BG_m incident beam, the average SAM can be calculated and is with the form

S_{z} = Re {\frac{2}{σ_{o} + σ_{e}^{*}} I_{m} [\frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{2 (σ_{o} + σ_{e}^{*})}] \exp [\frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{2} (\frac{1}{σ_{o} + σ_{e}^{*}} - \frac{1}{2})]} / I_{m} (\frac{β^{2} w_{0}^{2}}{4}),

(4)

where I_m(x) stands for the modified Bessel function of first kind. By employing the conservation law of angular momentum, we get the average OAM per photon

L_{z} = 1 - m - S_{z} .

(5)

SAM and OAM are not independent of each other, thus we can control SAM and OAM simultaneously. In the next section, we will use numerical method to investigate the influence of Pockels effect on the local (density) and global (average) properties of SAM and OAM in the output beam.

3. The electric control of local and global angular momentum of the output beam

To study the electric dependence of the local and global angular momentum, and of the conversion between SAM and OAM, we first consider the lowest order BG beam with β = 1 μm⁻¹ and w₀ = 10 μm at the input plane (z = 0), propagating along the optical axis of SBN crystal. The parameters of the beam are in paraxial regime [27

R. Borghi, M. Santarsiero, and M. A. Porras, “Nonparaxial Bessel-Gauss beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18(7), 1618–1626 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. BG beam is a well known diffraction-free beam [28

F. Gori, G. Guattari, and C. Padovani, “Bessel-Gauss beams,” Opt. Commun. 64(6), 491–495 (1987). [CrossRef]

]. However, it is non-diffracting for a distance D = kw₀/β only. The intensity distribution of BG beam cannot keep its initial profile and becomes single-ringed after a propagation distance z>>D [28

F. Gori, G. Guattari, and C. Padovani, “Bessel-Gauss beams,” Opt. Commun. 64(6), 491–495 (1987). [CrossRef]

]. In our case, the length of the crystal L = 8 mm is much longer than D, thus the total intensity pattern of output light beam is a single ring when E₀ = 0, which is evident in Fig. 1(b) . The pattern hardly changes when the applied electric field varies from −1.6883 to 3.55 kV/mm. The local SAM and OAM densities have circular symmetry. Figure 1(c) shows the dependences of normalized SAM (blue line) and OAM (red line) densities on radius for different E₀, from which one sees that, the densities can be tuned by the applied electric field. This is because the Pockels effect modulates the diffraction lengths of both ordinary and extraordinary beam components [24

A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Circularly polarized beams and vortex generation in uniaxial media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(1), 163–171 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. And hence the RHP and LHP components change with E₀ [shown by Eqs. (2a) and (2b)]. As a result, the local SAM and OAM densities become electrically tunable. At E₀ = −1.6883 kV/mm the OAM vanishes.

Fig. 1 The intensity distributions of the input beam |E_in|² (a) and the output beam |E_out|² (b) for a RHP BG₀ incident beam with β = 1 μm⁻¹ and w₀ = 10 μm when E₀ = 0. (c) The dependences of the normalized SAM (blue line) and OAM (red line) densities on the radius for different applied electric fields E₀ (in kV/mm).

Then a single ring emerges in OAM density pattern and grows gradually. The peak value of the ring increases with E₀ and reaches its maximum at E₀ = 1 kV/mm. At the same time, the SAM density changes from positive to negative one. The reverse process occurs when E₀ continues increasing. The distributions of OAM and SAM densities are interesting for some special values of E_0. For example, at E₀ = 3.55 kV/mm, the OAM density is not longer single-ringed but double-ringed. There are two rings with opposite signs in the SAM pattern when E₀ = −0.35 and 2.26 kV/mm. That is to say, the SAMs located at these two rings have different orientations. Therefore, two absorbing or birefringent particles trapped in these two different rings (off axis) may have opposite rotation directions. The sign of the inner ring is positive while that of the outer ring is negative at E₀ = −0.35 kV/mm. The signs of these two rings reverse at E₀ = 2.26 kV/mm. Form Fig. 1(b) and 1(c) one concludes that, the patterns of SAM and OAM densities are quite different with that of total intensity.

In the following, we investigate the control of the global SAM and OAM of the output beam, and compare them with the local ones. For a RHP BG₀ incident beam, the global SAM and OAM of the output beam can be calculated according to Eqs. (4) and (5). And their dependences on the applied electric field E₀ are shown in Fig. 2 for w₀ = 10 μm, where the blue and green lines represent the global SAM and OAM, respectively. As illustrated by Fig. 2, the conversion between SAM and OAM is electrically controllable. When E₀ varies from −1.6883 to 0.87 kV/mm, SAM transfers to OAM gradually. The conversion efficiency of such a transformation defined as a ratio of the energy of LHP component to the total energy of output light beam, namely, η = (1-S_z)/2, has a maximum value more than 90% at E₀ = 0.87 kV/mm. When further increasing E₀, OAM returns back to SAM. By comparing Fig. 1(c) and 2, one finds that, the applied electric field for obtaining the maximum value of global OAM (E₀ = 0.87 kV/mm) is smaller than that corresponding to the maximum peak in OAM density pattern (E₀ = 1 kV/mm). Although the ring in the OAM density pattern has a relatively smaller peak value at E₀ = 0.87 kV/mm, it has a larger size, which leads to a maximum global OAM. One can further conclude that, light beam may have different local angular momentum density patterns even though its global angular momentum is identical. Besides, the local angular momentum changes in both magnitude and sign over the beam profile, while the global one describes the whole beam by a single value. Thus the signs of the local angular momentum density in some regions can be different with the global one.

Fig. 2 The dependences of the global SAM and OAM on E₀ for a RHP BG₀ incident beam with β = 1 μm⁻¹ and w₀ = 10 μm.

We find that the conversion efficiency from SAM to OAM depends not only on applied electric field E₀ but also on beam waist w₀. Figure 3 shows the efficiency as a function of E₀ and w₀ for L = 8 mm and β = 1 μm⁻¹. One sees from Fig. 3 that, the maximum conversion efficiency increases with w₀, reaches 99.61% when w₀ = 50μm. And the applied electric field has only a small change for different w₀ at the maximum conversion efficiency.

Fig. 3 The conversion efficiency from SAM to OAM as a function of the applied electric field E₀ and the beam waist w₀ for L = 8 mm and β = 1 μm⁻¹. The dashed line shows the maximum conversion efficiency.

4. The electric control of local and global angular momentum of the light beam after SBN and QWP

When a quarter-wave plate (QWP) with its fast axis being 45° to x-axis is placed near the output surface of SBN crystal, it will transfer RHP and LHP components to horizontal and vertical ones, respectively, and causes a phase difference of π/2 between the horizontal and vertical components [23

A. Yariv, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, 1983).

]. Therefore, the light field after QWP becomes

\begin{matrix} E = A_{1} (r, z) \exp (- i m φ) x + A_{2} (r, z) \exp [- i (m - 2) φ - i π / 2] y \\ = \sqrt{{| A_{1} (r, z) |}^{2} + {| A_{2} (r, z) |}^{2}} \exp [- i m φ + i \arg (A_{1} (r, z))] [\begin{array}{l} \cos Ψ (r, z) \\ \sin Ψ (r, z) e^{i δ (r, φ, z)} \end{array}], \end{matrix}

(6)

where tanΨ(r,z) = |A₂(r,z)|/|A₁(r,z)| and δ(r,φ,z) = arg(A₂(r,z))-arg(A₁(r,z)) + 2φ-π/2. After some simple calculations, we find that the total intensity and the OAM keep the same as those before QWP. The SAM, in contrast, shows new features. The global SAM vanishes whatever the applied electric field is. Of particular interesting, the local SAM density is nonzero, except for E₀ = −1.6883 kV/mm. As shown by the Jones representation in Eq. (6), the phase difference between the horizontal and vertical components of light field depends on the azimuthal angle, while the parameter Ψ is independent of it. Therefore the parameter S₃ = sin(2Ψ)sinδ has 2-fold rotational symmetry around the axis of light beam, which means that the SAM density has lost its circular symmetry. The parameters Ψ and δ rely on both radius r and the applied electric field E₀, and the sign of sinδ would change with r and E₀. So, the SAM density will change its magnitude and sign against r or E₀. Figure 4 shows the electric dependence of normalized SAM density for a RHP BG₀ incident beam, where the beam waist of the incident beam is chosen to be 10 μm in order to display the SAM density patterns in good quality. For E₀ in range of −1.6883 and −0.35 kV/mm, the SAM density is closely proportional to -sin(2φ), and has a ring shape pattern. The peak value of the ring increases with E₀ and reaches its maximum at E₀ = −0.35 kV/mm. Then it decreases when E₀ further increases and vanish at E₀ = 2.26 kV/mm. When E₀ varies from −0.35 to 2.26 kV/mm, an outer ring emerges in the density pattern and grows gradually. And the SAM located at this ring is nearly directly proportional to sin(2φ). The peak value of the outer ring reaches its maximum at E₀ = 2.26 kV/mm, when the inner ring disappears and a new ring with a radius larger than the old outer ring begins to emerge. It is worth noting that the peak values of inner and outer rings are equal at E₀ = 1 and 3.55 kV/mm. However, the signs of the SAM densities for these two cases are opposite. For higher-order BG incident beams, the patterns of SAM density have similar behavior, changing with E₀, if L>>D.

Fig. 4 The patterns of the normalized SAM density for different E₀ with a RHP BG₀ beam of β = 1 μm⁻¹ and w₀ = 10 μm incident. E₀ is in kV/mm.

5. Conclusion

We have investigated the electro-optical control of the local SAM and OAM of light beam by focusing a RHP BG_m beam into a SBN crystal with an applied electric field E₀ along its optical axis. For a BG₀ beam incident onto a 8 mm long crystal, SAM converts to OAM with a very high conversion efficiency, for example 99.61% when w₀ = 50μm. The patterns of SAM and OAM densities of the output light beam are ring-shaped and electrically controllable. When the output beam passes through a QWP, the OAM keeps the same, while the SAM shows new features. The local SAM density loses its circular symmetry and is proportional to ± sin(2φ) with signs dependent on the radius and E₀.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (grant 90921009).

References and links

1.	L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A 45(11), 8185–8189 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.	H. He, M. E. Friese, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(5), 826–829 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.	S. H. Tao, X.-C. Yuan, J. Lin, X. Peng, and H. B. Niu, “Fractional optical vortex beam induced rotation of particles,” Opt. Express 13(20), 7726–7731 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.	A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, “Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 3(2), 161–204 (2011) (and references therein). [CrossRef]
5.	A. Vaziri, J. W. Pan, T. Jennewein, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: Qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(22), 227902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.	L. Paterson, M. P. MacDonald, J. Arlt, W. Sibbett, P. E. Bryant, and K. Dholakia, “Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles,” Science 292(5518), 912–914 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.	R. Dasgupta, S. Ahlawat, R. S. Verma, and P. K. Gupta, “Optical orientation and rotation of trapped red blood cells with Laguerre-Gaussian mode,” Opt. Express 19(8), 7680–7688 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.	R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Angular momentum of multimode and polarization patterns,” Opt. Express 15(23), 15214–15227 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	V. Garcés-Chávez, D. McGloin, M. J. Padgett, W. Dultz, H. Schmitzer, and K. Dholakia, “Observation of the transfer of the local angular momentum density of a multi-ringed light beam to an optically trapped particle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(9), 093602 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.	K. Volke-Sepulveda, S. Chávez-Cerda, V. Garcés-Chávez, and K. Dholakia, “Three-dimensional optical forces and transfer of orbital angular momentum from multiringed light beams to spherical microparticles,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1749–1757 (2004). [CrossRef]
11.	L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, “Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(16), 163905 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.	Z. Bouchal, V. Kollarova, P. Zemanek, and T. Cizmar, “Orbital angular momentum of mixed vortex beams,” Proc. SPIE 6609, 660907, 660907-8 (2007). [CrossRef]
13.	I. A. Litvin, A. Dudley, and A. Forbes, “Poynting vector and orbital angular momentum density of superpositions of Bessel beams,” Opt. Express 19(18), 16760–16771 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	S. H. Tao, X. C. Yuan, J. Lin, and R. E. Burge, “Residue orbital angular momentum in interferenced double vortex beams with unequal topological charges,” Opt. Express 14(2), 535–541 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.	C. H. J. Schmitz, K. Uhrig, J. P. Spatz, and J. E. Curtis, “Tuning the orbital angular momentum in optical vortex beams,” Opt. Express 14(15), 6604–6612 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.	E. Brasselet, Y. Izdebskaya, V. Shvedov, A. S. Desyatnikov, W. Krolikowski, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dynamics of optical spin-orbit coupling in uniaxial crystals,” Opt. Lett. 34(7), 1021–1023 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.	Y. A. Egorov, T. A. Fadeyeva, and A. V. Volyar, “The fine structure of singular beams in crystals: colours and polarization,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6(5), S217–S228 (2004). [CrossRef]
18.	C. Loussert and E. Brasselet, “Efficient scalar and vectorial singular beam shaping using homogeneous anisotropic media,” Opt. Lett. 35(1), 7–9 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.	N. A. Khilo, E. S. Petrova, and A. A. Ryzhevich, “Transformation of the order of Bessel light beams in uniaxial crystals,” Quantum Electron. 31(1), 85–89 (2001). [CrossRef]
20.	W. Zhu and W. She, “Electro-optically generating and controlling right- and left-handed circularly polarized multiring modes of light beams,” Opt. Lett. 37(14), 2823–2825 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21.	A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Angular momentum dynamics of a paraxial beam in a uniaxial crystal,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 67(3), 036618 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22.	L. Chen and W. She, “Electro-optically forbidden or enhanced spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in a focused light beam,” Opt. Lett. 33(7), 696–698 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.	A. Yariv, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, 1983).
24.	A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Circularly polarized beams and vortex generation in uniaxial media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(1), 163–171 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.	T. A. Fadeyeva and A. V. Volyar, “Extreme spin-orbit coupling in crystal-travelling paraxial beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(3), 381–389 (2010). [CrossRef]
26.	R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Local transfer of angular momentum to matter,” J. Mod. Opt. 52, 1045–1052 (2005). [CrossRef]
27.	R. Borghi, M. Santarsiero, and M. A. Porras, “Nonparaxial Bessel-Gauss beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18(7), 1618–1626 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28.	F. Gori, G. Guattari, and C. Padovani, “Bessel-Gauss beams,” Opt. Commun. 64(6), 491–495 (1987). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(230.2090) Optical devices : Electro-optical devices
(260.2160) Physical optics : Energy transfer
(350.4855) Other areas of optics : Optical tweezers or optical manipulation

ToC Category:
Physical Optics

History
Original Manuscript: August 28, 2012
Revised Manuscript: October 2, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 5, 2012
Published: November 1, 2012

Citation
Wenguo Zhu and Weilong She, "Electrically controlling spin and orbital angular momentum of a focused light beam in a uniaxial crystal," Opt. Express 20, 25876-25883 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-23-25876

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A45(11), 8185–8189 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
H. He, M. E. Friese, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75(5), 826–829 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
S. H. Tao, X.-C. Yuan, J. Lin, X. Peng, and H. B. Niu, “Fractional optical vortex beam induced rotation of particles,” Opt. Express13(20), 7726–7731 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, “Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,” Adv. Opt. Photon.3(2), 161–204 (2011) (and references therein). [CrossRef]
A. Vaziri, J. W. Pan, T. Jennewein, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: Qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91(22), 227902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
L. Paterson, M. P. MacDonald, J. Arlt, W. Sibbett, P. E. Bryant, and K. Dholakia, “Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles,” Science292(5518), 912–914 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R. Dasgupta, S. Ahlawat, R. S. Verma, and P. K. Gupta, “Optical orientation and rotation of trapped red blood cells with Laguerre-Gaussian mode,” Opt. Express19(8), 7680–7688 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Angular momentum of multimode and polarization patterns,” Opt. Express15(23), 15214–15227 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
V. Garcés-Chávez, D. McGloin, M. J. Padgett, W. Dultz, H. Schmitzer, and K. Dholakia, “Observation of the transfer of the local angular momentum density of a multi-ringed light beam to an optically trapped particle,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91(9), 093602 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
K. Volke-Sepulveda, S. Chávez-Cerda, V. Garcés-Chávez, and K. Dholakia, “Three-dimensional optical forces and transfer of orbital angular momentum from multiringed light beams to spherical microparticles,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B21, 1749–1757 (2004). [CrossRef]
L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, “Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96(16), 163905 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Z. Bouchal, V. Kollarova, P. Zemanek, and T. Cizmar, “Orbital angular momentum of mixed vortex beams,” Proc. SPIE6609, 660907, 660907-8 (2007). [CrossRef]
I. A. Litvin, A. Dudley, and A. Forbes, “Poynting vector and orbital angular momentum density of superpositions of Bessel beams,” Opt. Express19(18), 16760–16771 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
S. H. Tao, X. C. Yuan, J. Lin, and R. E. Burge, “Residue orbital angular momentum in interferenced double vortex beams with unequal topological charges,” Opt. Express14(2), 535–541 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. H. J. Schmitz, K. Uhrig, J. P. Spatz, and J. E. Curtis, “Tuning the orbital angular momentum in optical vortex beams,” Opt. Express14(15), 6604–6612 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
E. Brasselet, Y. Izdebskaya, V. Shvedov, A. S. Desyatnikov, W. Krolikowski, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dynamics of optical spin-orbit coupling in uniaxial crystals,” Opt. Lett.34(7), 1021–1023 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Y. A. Egorov, T. A. Fadeyeva, and A. V. Volyar, “The fine structure of singular beams in crystals: colours and polarization,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A6(5), S217–S228 (2004). [CrossRef]
C. Loussert and E. Brasselet, “Efficient scalar and vectorial singular beam shaping using homogeneous anisotropic media,” Opt. Lett.35(1), 7–9 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
N. A. Khilo, E. S. Petrova, and A. A. Ryzhevich, “Transformation of the order of Bessel light beams in uniaxial crystals,” Quantum Electron.31(1), 85–89 (2001). [CrossRef]
W. Zhu and W. She, “Electro-optically generating and controlling right- and left-handed circularly polarized multiring modes of light beams,” Opt. Lett.37(14), 2823–2825 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Angular momentum dynamics of a paraxial beam in a uniaxial crystal,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys.67(3), 036618 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
L. Chen and W. She, “Electro-optically forbidden or enhanced spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in a focused light beam,” Opt. Lett.33(7), 696–698 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. Yariv, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, 1983).
A. Ciattoni, G. Cincotti, and C. Palma, “Circularly polarized beams and vortex generation in uniaxial media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A20(1), 163–171 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
T. A. Fadeyeva and A. V. Volyar, “Extreme spin-orbit coupling in crystal-travelling paraxial beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A27(3), 381–389 (2010). [CrossRef]
R. Zambrini and S. M. Barnett, “Local transfer of angular momentum to matter,” J. Mod. Opt.52, 1045–1052 (2005). [CrossRef]
R. Borghi, M. Santarsiero, and M. A. Porras, “Nonparaxial Bessel-Gauss beams,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A18(7), 1618–1626 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
F. Gori, G. Guattari, and C. Padovani, “Bessel-Gauss beams,” Opt. Commun.64(6), 491–495 (1987). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper