OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 20, Iss. 25 — Dec. 3, 2012
  • pp: 27820–27829
« Show journal navigation

Multi-gigahertz frequency comb-based interferometry using frequency-variable supercontinuum generated by optical pulse synthesizer

Samuel Choi, Ken Kasiwagi, Yosuke Kasuya, Shuto Kojima, Tatsutoshi Shioda, and Takashi Kurokawa  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 25, pp. 27820-27829 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.027820


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2031 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A multi-gigahertz frequency comb (MGFC)-based interferometer was developed for profilometry and tomography using a frequency variable supercontinuum (SC). The comparatively flattened and broadened SC light source with variable multi-gigahertz interval frequency was developed using an optical pulse synthesizer and highly nonlinear dispersion flattened fiber. The generated SC provided a stable interference output with a full width half maximum of 19 μm during interval frequency sweeping of over 400 MHz. We experimentally confirmed that the interference signal exhibited an envelope-only waveform without fringes, which enabled the drastic reduction of the sampling points resulting in high speed measurement. A full-field 3-D image with 320 × 256 × 300 pixels was acquired with a measurement time of only 10 seconds. It was demonstrated that the MGFC-based interferometer with the novel SC light source has the potential for application in a high speed full-field 3-D metrology.

© 2012 OSA

1. Introduction

Monochromatic laser interferometers using a phase shift [1

1. Y. Ishii, J. Chen, and K. Murata, “Digital phase-measuring interferometry with a tunable laser diode,” Opt. Lett. 12(4), 233–235 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or sinusoidal phase modulating method [2

2. O. Sasaki and H. Okazaki, “Sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry for surface profile measurement,” Appl. Opt. 25(18), 3137–3140 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] ensue high accuracy for a precise profilometer. However, these interferometers suffer from measurements of longer displacement than the wavelength due to 2π ambiguities of the measured interference phase. A variety of light sources such as white-light sources, wavelength tunable laser, and short pulse lasers have been used for optical interferometry, and been extensively developed for distance measurements, surface profilometry, and tomography. The femtosecond laser exhibits a frequency comb spectrum with a mode frequency (i.e. interval frequency) in the MHz band and a bandwidth of several tens of nano-meters. The femtosecond pulse laser can generate a much broader frequency comb called a supercontinuum (SC) in a highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF) [3

3. G. Genty, S. Coen, and J. M. Dudley, “Fiber supercontinuum sources (Invited),” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(8), 1771–1785 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. The SC has an extremely large broadband spectrum over several hundreds of nanometers with an interval frequency of the order of 10 MHz; therefore, it has been regarded as a white-light source with a semi-continuous spectrum, and has been applied to white-light interferometry with an ultra-high resolution [4

4. N. Nishizawa, Y. Chen, P. Hsiung, E. P. Ippen, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Real-time, ultrahigh-resolution, optical coherence tomography with an all-fiber, femtosecond fiber laser continuum at 1.5 microm,” Opt. Lett. 29(24), 2846–2848 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6

6. B. Povazay, K. Bizheva, A. Unterhuber, B. Hermann, H. Sattmann, A. F. Fercher, W. Drexler, A. Apolonski, W. J. Wadsworth, J. C. Knight, P. St. J. Russell, M. Vetterlein, and E. Scherzer, “Submicrometer axial resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 27(20), 1800–1802 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

For several years, a variety of metrology techniques based on frequency combs have been developed to replace white-light interferometers. The femtosecond laser has been utilized for precise distance measurements using the phase difference of the beat signal [7

7. K. Minoshima and H. Matsumoto, “High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser,” Appl. Opt. 39(30), 5512–5517 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and for metrology using the carrier envelope offset frequency [8

8. D. Wei, S. Takahashi, K. Takamasu, and H. Matsumoto, “Analysis of the temporal coherence function of a femtosecond optical frequency comb,” Opt. Express 17(9), 7011–7018 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The synthesis of the coherence function as a quasi-frequency comb has been utilized for fiber stress tests [9

9. Z. He and K. Hotate, “Distributed fiber-optics stress-location measurement by arbitrary shaping of optical coherence function,” J. Lightwave Technol. 20(9), 1715–1723 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. The frequency comb generator with a monolithic modulator has been applied to ultrahigh-speed tomography based on the vernier effects of the two slightly different repetition frequencies [10

10. S. J. Lee, B. Widiyatmoko, M. Kourogi, and M. Ohtsu, “Ultrahigh scanning speed optical coherence tomography,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40(Part 2, No. 8B), L878–L880 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. The surface profilometeries have been demonstrated using a Fizeau interferometer with multiple frequencies produced by a Fabry–Pérot cavity [11

11. J. Schwider, “Multiple beam Fizeau interferometer with filtered frequency comb illumination,” Opt. Commun. 282(16), 3308–3324 (2009). [CrossRef]

,12

12. S. Choi, H. Miyatsuka, O. Sasaki, and T. Suzuki, “Profilometry using Fizeau-interferometer based on optical comb interferometry and sinusoidal phase modulation method,” Proc. SPIE 7855, 78550K1–78550K7 (2010).

].The quasi-monochromatic optical coherence metrology using a spatial frequency comb has been proposed for dispersion-free depth sensing [13

13. Z. Duan, Y. Miyamoto, and M. Takeda, “Dispersion-free optical coherence depth sensing with a spatial frequency comb generated by an angular spectrum modulator,” Opt. Express 14(25), 12109–12121 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. More recently, short temporal coherence digital holography using the frequency comb has been proposed [14

14. K. Körner, G. Pedrini, I. Alexeenko, T. Steinmetz, R. Holzwarth, and W. Osten, “Short temporal coherence digital holography with a femtosecond frequency comb laser for multi-level optical sectioning,” Opt. Express 20(7), 7237–7242 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. As noted above, the requirements for various metrology techniques based on frequency combs has been increasing recently.

We have already proposed a laser frequency comb (LFC)-based interferometer without mechanical scanning for surface profilometry and tomography [15

15. S. Choi, M. Yamamoto, D. Moteki, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Frequency-comb-based interferometer for profilometry and tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31(13), 1976–1978 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 16

16. S. Choi, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Frequency-comb-based interference microscope with a line-type image sensor,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(10A), 6842–6847 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. This technology has the potential for full electro-optic and a high speed measurement for a full-field 3-D profilometry. It requires a multi-gigaherz frequency comb (MGFC) light source with a variable interval frequency. However, it is not easy to produce a variable and multi-gigaherz interval frequency.

2. Principle of MGFC-based interferometer using SC light source

Figure 1
Fig. 1 Schematic of MGFC-based interferometer.
shows the configuration for the MGFC-based interferometer using the SC light source with a variable MGFC. This system consists of an SC light source and a microscopic interferometer. The SC light source consists of a seed comb generator, the OPS, a high-power erbium doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), and a highly nonlinear fiber. The initial seed comb was generated by an optical modulator and a laser diode (LD). The comb interval frequency was determined at 12.5 GHz by a modulation frequency applied to the optical modulator. The OPS synthesizes picosecond pump pulses with a repetition frequency of 12.5 GHz from the initial seed comb. The pump pulse peak power was amplified by the EDFA to achieve a sufficient nonlinear effect in the HNLF. The interval frequency of the generated SC was varied by several hundred MHz by sweeping the modulation frequency applied to the optical modulator. The generated SC entered the microscopic interferometer, in which the high order interference was produced by reflection beams from a sample and a reference mirror.

The N-th order interference waveform SN detected on the detector can be approximately written by
SN=A(νiNncL)cos(2πLλc),
(1)
where n, c, νi, L, and λc, are the refractive index, speed of light, the interval frequency, the optical path difference (OPD), and the comb center wavelength, respectively. In Eq. (1), the following expression
A(νiNncL)
(2)
denotes the envelope function of the interference waveform, which is proportional to the inverse Fourier transform of the envelope of the SC power spectrum. The envelope term A can be observed as an interference waveform with an intensity peak which appears every time the interval frequency satisfies νi = Nnc/L. The measurable range is approximately expressed as
ΔL=Nncνi2Δν,
(3)
which is proportional to the frequency sweeping range Δν and interference order N. The depth axial resolution is equivalent to the intensity peak width determined by the SC bandwidth.

The phase term of cos(2πL/λc) in the SN is fixed at a constant value because the OPD and the λc are fixed while the νi is swept. Figure 2
Fig. 2 The interference waveforms (a) as a function of L as given in Eq. (4), and (b) as a function of νi for the N-th interference order as given in Eq. (1). The waveforms each correspond to the mechanical mirror scan and interval frequency sweeping, respectively. The sampling point in (b) can be reduced by comparison with that in (a). This is because one period of the interference fringe system in (a) requires at least eight sampling points to be acquired, whereas in the case of (b), a larger sampling step with the wavelength range is sufficient to acquire the intensity peak.
shows schematics of the interference waveform obtained by varying νi (i.e., interval frequency) and L (i.e., OPD), respectively for the interference order of N. Note that this phase term characterizes a unique interference output which is different from the one in the conventional time-domain interferometer. In the time-domain interferometer, the interference waveform is rewritten as
A(L)cos(2πLλc),
(4)
where A(L) has an intensity peak when L = 0. Because the phase term cos(2πL/λc) in Eq. (4) is varied by a mechanical scan of L, the interference fringe with a period of the wavelength λc is observed.

For this interference characteristic wherein only the intensity envelope is directly obtained, the number of measurement points can be greatly reduced to less than 1/8 relative to a conventional interferometry as shown in Fig. 2. In addition, a full-field 3-D profile can be measured using a 2-D CCD image sensor without x-y axial scanning because the high output power and coherence of the SC permits the illumination of the entire field of the sample surface. For example, as a sampling interval longer than the wavelength can sufficiently fix the interference waveform, a 3-D profile with a measurement range of 1 mm requires only approximately 500 points. A high-speed CCD image sensor with a frame rate of a few KHz enables a measurement time of within one second to obtain the 3-D volume data. Therefore, a high speed and stable full-field measurement can be performed by the MGFC-based interferometry.

3. Pump pulse synthesis and SC generation

Figure 3
Fig. 3 SC light source (SG: signal generator, PC: polarization controller, LN-PM: lithium-niobate phase modulator, IM: Intensity modulator, PM: phase modulator, HNLF: highly nonlinear fiber).
shows the actual experimental setup for the SC light source. The light source was a distributed feedback LD with a center wavelength in the 1550 nm region. The initial seed comb with an interval frequency of 12.5 GHz was produced as approximately 30 sidebands using the single Lithium Niobate phase modulator driven by an RF signal generator (SG). By varying the RF, we investigated the stability of seed comb spectrum for an interval frequency sweep. As a result it was determined that the spectral intensity fluctuation in the comb spectrum was negligible even for an interval frequency sweeping of several hundred MHz.

The OPS consisted of an arrayed waveguide grating (AWG) with 30 output waveguides. Each output waveguide has an intensity and phase modulator. They are integrated on a single chip fabricated by silica-based planar waveguide technology. The AWG spectrally separates the input comb into the waveguides with 12.5-GHz spacing. The interval frequency sweeping range is unlimited within the channel bandwidth of the AWG. The modulators precisely manipulate the intensity and phase of each frequency component. The pulse waveform was synthesized as follows. First, we defined the target intensity spectrum, which was calculated by the Fourier transform of the desired pulse shapes. Next, the power spectrum of the optical frequency combs was reshaped with the intensity modulators by monitoring the power spectrum with an optical spectrum analyzer. Finally, the phase spectrum was adjusted using the feedback control of the phase modulators to obtain target-shaped pulses. We employed genetic algorithm to precisely manipulate the phase spectrum. We used the differences between the pulse waveform measured by an autocorrelator and the target waveform as a fitness function.

Figure 4(a)
Fig. 4 Synthesized sech2 pulse obtained by the OPS. (a) Auto-correlation waveforms, and (b) FWHM as a function of the repetition frequency from 12.3 to 12.7 GHz.
shows autocorrelation waveforms of the synthesized sech2 pulse used to vary the repetition frequency, which was varied by the comb interval frequency νi. The time-bandwidth product was 0.351 with a full width half maximum (FWHM) of 3.4 ps when the repetition frequency was 12.5 GHz. Marginal variation in the pulse waveform was observed when sweeping the repetition frequency from 12.3 to 12.7 GHz. Figure 4(b) shows FWHM of the pulses as a function of the repetition frequency. The change in the FWHM of the synthesized pulse was within ± 0.3 ps for the interval frequency sweep in the range of 400 MHz.

The synthesized sech2 pulse was amplified by a high power EDFA and propagated in the HNLF. We investigated the SC characteristics of HN-DSF and HN-DFF for a length of 1km. The HN-DSF has a zero-dispersion wavelength of 1571 nm with a dispersion slope of + 0.019 ps/nm2/km. The group velocity dispersion (GVD) at 1550 nm was −0.37 ps/nm/km with a nonlinear coefficient of 30 /W/km. On the other hand, the HN-DFF has a flattened dispersion slope, which is + 0.003 ps/nm2/km less than that of HN-DSF. It exhbits a GVD of −0.02 ps/nm/km and a nonlinear coefficient of 7 /W/km at 1550 nm. Both parameters are much smaller than those of HN-DSF.

Figure 5(a)
Fig. 5 SC spectra generated by propagating (a) the HN-DSF and (b) the HN-DFF as the pulse peak power was increased (the interval frequency was 12.5 GHz).
and 5(b) show the generated SC spectra as a function of the pulse peak power input into the HN-DSF and HN-DFF, respectively. The pulse peak power was amplified by the EDFA from approximately 4 to 41 W. The SC spectrum broadening in the HN-DSF was suppressed for the wavelength range of 1520−1570 nm, even if the peak power was increased, as shown in Fig. 5(a). This was due to the modulation instability in the anomalous dispersion regime of the HN-DSF. On the other hand, the SC spectrum in the HN-DFF was broadened more effectively by the SPM effects in the normal dispersion region over the range of 1520−1600 nm. The bandwidth in terms of −20dB became approximately 90 nm when the pump pulse was amplified by 41 W.

We investigated the effect on the SC spectrum of the sweep of the pulse repetition frequency when it was applied to the MGFC-based interferometer. Figure 6(a)
Fig. 6 (a) SC spectral envelopes and (b) fluctuation of −20dB-bandwidth of the SC generated from a 12.5 GHz sech2 pulse as a function of the repetition frequency sweep.
shows the variation of the SC spectral envelope as a function of the repetition frequency when the input pulse peak power was 41 W. Figure 6(b) shows the −20 dB-bandwidth fluctuation as a function of the repetition frequency. Marginal variation was observed in the SC spectrum when the repetition frequency was swept. In Fig. 6(b), the red square plot shows the simulated interference peak widths calculated using the inverse Fourier transform from the spectral envelopes shown in Fig. 6(a). The maximum fluctuation of the spectrum bandwidth was approximately 6 nm when the repetition frequency was swept in a range of over 400 MHz. This resulted in a very small change that was less than 1 μm of the interference peak width (i.e., axial resolution) for the repetition frequency sweep.

5. MGFC-based interferometer and its demonstration

We constructed a microscopic MGFC-based interferometer with a frequency-variable SC light source, as shown in Fig. 7
Fig. 7 A schematic of a microscopic MGFC-based interferometer.
. The light beam output from the SC light source through an SMF was collimated with a beam diameter of 2 mm. The input average power was attenuated less than approximately 1 mW by using a tunable fiber attenuator placed before the collimator to avoid the damage of a CCD image sensor. The collimated beam was divided into two paths by a non-polarization beam splitter (BS) with a ratio of 50:50 over the wavelength range of 1500−1600 nm. The transmitted beam was reflected by a gold-coated reference mirror that produced a reference wave. The reflected beam was directed toward the object. The illuminated area was magnified to 10 times using an objective lens with a working range of 10 mm. The OPD was set to 72 mm to observe the 6-th interference order with an interval frequency of approximately 12.5 GHz. The interference image recombined by the BS was formed by an optical configuration with the objective and projection lenses on a detection plane of a photo detector or a 2-D CCD image sensor (ALPHA NIR, 30 frame/s). The sensitivity of noise equivalent irradiation of the CCD was approximately 1 nW/cm2 at the wavelength of 1550 nm.

Before taking the 3-D measurements for some samples, we first observed the interference waveform for both the interval frequency sweep and the mechanical scan. The observation was performed using the microscopic interferometer shown in Fig. 7 with a photo detector instead of the CCD. Figure 8(a)
Fig. 8 Interference waveforms of 6-th order; (a) intensity peak obtained by the interval frequency sweeping and (b) mirror scan. The interval frequency was varied for 40 MHz with 0.1 MHz step corresponding to the scan range of approximately 230 μm and step size of approximately 0.57 μm in (a). In (b) the mirror scan range was 200 μm with a 0.05 μm step. The number of sampling points in (a) and (b) are 400 and 4000 respectively.
shows the envelope−only interference waveform without fringes, as observed by the interval frequency sweep. On the other hand, in the case of the mechanical scan of the reference mirror for the fixed frequency comb, an interference waveform with fringes was observed as shown in Fig. 8(b). These results agree with the principle (e.g. Figure 2). There is a difference factor of greater than 10 between the sampling points of these two methods. The FWHM of both intensity peaks were approximately 19 μm, and the resulting interference waveforms exhibited small ripples which may disturb the S/N ratio. The spectral shaping of the SC in the vicinity of the pump wavelength using a proper frequency filter is required for further improvement.

Figure 9
Fig. 9 Tomographic measurement of glass plate obtained by the interval frequency sweeping.
shows the one-dimensional tomographic measurement of a glass plate with a thickness of approximately 0.15 mm. The interference signal was obtained by the interval frequency sweep ranging from 12.45 to 12.55 GHz with a 0.1 MHz step. This sweeping range corresponded to an approximately 500 μm scan range with a 0.6 μm sampling interval. Even such a coarse sampling interval enables us to fix the interference peak, and results in a high-speed measurement. The average depth axial resolution was approximately 19 μm, which was maintained during measurement with the interval frequency sweep. The measured optical thickness including the refractive index was 219 μm, which agreed well with the known value that was measured by a caliper. The standard deviation of the thicknesses from nine measurements was 0.6 μm.

5. Conclusion

The MGFC-based interferometer was developed for surface profile and tomographic measurement using a frequency-variable SC. The comparatively flattened and broadened SC light source with a variable multi-gigahertz interval frequency was developed using an optical pulse synthesizer and HN-DFF. The generated SC provided stable interference output with a FWHM of 19 μm during interval frequency sweeping of over 400 MHz. We experimentally confirmed that the interference signal exhibited an envelope-only waveform without fringes, which enabled the drastic reduction of the sampling points resulting in high speed measurement. The cross-section of the glass plate was measured with a repeatability of 0.6 μm. We acquired the full-field 3-D 320 × 256 × 300 pixel image of the surface profile of a 10-yen coin with a measurement time of only 10 seconds. It was demonstrated that the MGFC-based interferometer with the novel SC light source has the potential for an application in a high-speed full-field 3-D metrology.

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was supported by Grant-in-Aid of JSPS No. 23360029. The authors appreciate the contributions of Naoyuki Tamura and Hiroyuki Ishizu. Samuel Choi thanks Osami Sasaki for his helpful discussions and encouragement.

References and links

1.

Y. Ishii, J. Chen, and K. Murata, “Digital phase-measuring interferometry with a tunable laser diode,” Opt. Lett. 12(4), 233–235 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

O. Sasaki and H. Okazaki, “Sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry for surface profile measurement,” Appl. Opt. 25(18), 3137–3140 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

G. Genty, S. Coen, and J. M. Dudley, “Fiber supercontinuum sources (Invited),” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(8), 1771–1785 (2007). [CrossRef]

4.

N. Nishizawa, Y. Chen, P. Hsiung, E. P. Ippen, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Real-time, ultrahigh-resolution, optical coherence tomography with an all-fiber, femtosecond fiber laser continuum at 1.5 microm,” Opt. Lett. 29(24), 2846–2848 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

W. Drexler, U. Morgner, R. K. Ghanta, F. X. Kärtner, J. S. Schuman, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography,” Nat. Med. 7(4), 502–507 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

B. Povazay, K. Bizheva, A. Unterhuber, B. Hermann, H. Sattmann, A. F. Fercher, W. Drexler, A. Apolonski, W. J. Wadsworth, J. C. Knight, P. St. J. Russell, M. Vetterlein, and E. Scherzer, “Submicrometer axial resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 27(20), 1800–1802 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

K. Minoshima and H. Matsumoto, “High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser,” Appl. Opt. 39(30), 5512–5517 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

D. Wei, S. Takahashi, K. Takamasu, and H. Matsumoto, “Analysis of the temporal coherence function of a femtosecond optical frequency comb,” Opt. Express 17(9), 7011–7018 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

Z. He and K. Hotate, “Distributed fiber-optics stress-location measurement by arbitrary shaping of optical coherence function,” J. Lightwave Technol. 20(9), 1715–1723 (2002). [CrossRef]

10.

S. J. Lee, B. Widiyatmoko, M. Kourogi, and M. Ohtsu, “Ultrahigh scanning speed optical coherence tomography,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40(Part 2, No. 8B), L878–L880 (2001). [CrossRef]

11.

J. Schwider, “Multiple beam Fizeau interferometer with filtered frequency comb illumination,” Opt. Commun. 282(16), 3308–3324 (2009). [CrossRef]

12.

S. Choi, H. Miyatsuka, O. Sasaki, and T. Suzuki, “Profilometry using Fizeau-interferometer based on optical comb interferometry and sinusoidal phase modulation method,” Proc. SPIE 7855, 78550K1–78550K7 (2010).

13.

Z. Duan, Y. Miyamoto, and M. Takeda, “Dispersion-free optical coherence depth sensing with a spatial frequency comb generated by an angular spectrum modulator,” Opt. Express 14(25), 12109–12121 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

K. Körner, G. Pedrini, I. Alexeenko, T. Steinmetz, R. Holzwarth, and W. Osten, “Short temporal coherence digital holography with a femtosecond frequency comb laser for multi-level optical sectioning,” Opt. Express 20(7), 7237–7242 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

S. Choi, M. Yamamoto, D. Moteki, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Frequency-comb-based interferometer for profilometry and tomography,” Opt. Lett. 31(13), 1976–1978 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

S. Choi, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Frequency-comb-based interference microscope with a line-type image sensor,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(10A), 6842–6847 (2007). [CrossRef]

17.

K. Mandai, D. Miyamoto, T. Suzuki, H. Tsuda, A. Aizawa, and T. Kurokawa, “Repetition rate and center wavelength-tunable optical pulse generation using an optical comb generator and a high resolution arrayed-waveguide grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(5), 679–681 (2006). [CrossRef]

18.

H. Tsuda, Y. Tanaka, T. Shioda, and T. Kurokawa, “Analog and digital optical pulse synthesizers using arrayed-waveguide gratings for high-speed optical signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(6), 670–677 (2008). [CrossRef]

19.

S. Choi, N. Tamura, K. Kashiwagi, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Supercontinuum comb generation using optical pulse synthesizer and highly nonlinear dispersion-shifted fiber,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48(9), 09LF01 (2009). [CrossRef]

20.

T. Ohta, N. Nishizawa, T. Ozawa, and K. Itoh, “Highly-sensitive and high-resolution all-fiber three-dimensional measurement system,” Appl. Opt. 47(13), 2503–2509 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(110.6960) Imaging systems : Tomography
(120.3180) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Interferometry
(120.6650) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Surface measurements, figure
(320.6629) Ultrafast optics : Supercontinuum generation

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: September 27, 2012
Revised Manuscript: November 16, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: November 19, 2012
Published: November 29, 2012

Citation
Samuel Choi, Ken Kasiwagi, Yosuke Kasuya, Shuto Kojima, Tatsutoshi Shioda, and Takashi Kurokawa, "Multi-gigahertz frequency comb-based interferometry using frequency-variable supercontinuum generated by optical pulse synthesizer," Opt. Express 20, 27820-27829 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-25-27820


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Y. Ishii, J. Chen, and K. Murata, “Digital phase-measuring interferometry with a tunable laser diode,” Opt. Lett.12(4), 233–235 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. O. Sasaki and H. Okazaki, “Sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry for surface profile measurement,” Appl. Opt.25(18), 3137–3140 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. G. Genty, S. Coen, and J. M. Dudley, “Fiber supercontinuum sources (Invited),” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B24(8), 1771–1785 (2007). [CrossRef]
  4. N. Nishizawa, Y. Chen, P. Hsiung, E. P. Ippen, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Real-time, ultrahigh-resolution, optical coherence tomography with an all-fiber, femtosecond fiber laser continuum at 1.5 microm,” Opt. Lett.29(24), 2846–2848 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. W. Drexler, U. Morgner, R. K. Ghanta, F. X. Kärtner, J. S. Schuman, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography,” Nat. Med.7(4), 502–507 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. B. Povazay, K. Bizheva, A. Unterhuber, B. Hermann, H. Sattmann, A. F. Fercher, W. Drexler, A. Apolonski, W. J. Wadsworth, J. C. Knight, P. St. J. Russell, M. Vetterlein, and E. Scherzer, “Submicrometer axial resolution optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett.27(20), 1800–1802 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. K. Minoshima and H. Matsumoto, “High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser,” Appl. Opt.39(30), 5512–5517 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. Wei, S. Takahashi, K. Takamasu, and H. Matsumoto, “Analysis of the temporal coherence function of a femtosecond optical frequency comb,” Opt. Express17(9), 7011–7018 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Z. He and K. Hotate, “Distributed fiber-optics stress-location measurement by arbitrary shaping of optical coherence function,” J. Lightwave Technol.20(9), 1715–1723 (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. S. J. Lee, B. Widiyatmoko, M. Kourogi, and M. Ohtsu, “Ultrahigh scanning speed optical coherence tomography,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.40(Part 2, No. 8B), L878–L880 (2001). [CrossRef]
  11. J. Schwider, “Multiple beam Fizeau interferometer with filtered frequency comb illumination,” Opt. Commun.282(16), 3308–3324 (2009). [CrossRef]
  12. S. Choi, H. Miyatsuka, O. Sasaki, and T. Suzuki, “Profilometry using Fizeau-interferometer based on optical comb interferometry and sinusoidal phase modulation method,” Proc. SPIE7855, 78550K1–78550K7 (2010).
  13. Z. Duan, Y. Miyamoto, and M. Takeda, “Dispersion-free optical coherence depth sensing with a spatial frequency comb generated by an angular spectrum modulator,” Opt. Express14(25), 12109–12121 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. K. Körner, G. Pedrini, I. Alexeenko, T. Steinmetz, R. Holzwarth, and W. Osten, “Short temporal coherence digital holography with a femtosecond frequency comb laser for multi-level optical sectioning,” Opt. Express20(7), 7237–7242 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. S. Choi, M. Yamamoto, D. Moteki, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Frequency-comb-based interferometer for profilometry and tomography,” Opt. Lett.31(13), 1976–1978 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. S. Choi, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Frequency-comb-based interference microscope with a line-type image sensor,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.46(10A), 6842–6847 (2007). [CrossRef]
  17. K. Mandai, D. Miyamoto, T. Suzuki, H. Tsuda, A. Aizawa, and T. Kurokawa, “Repetition rate and center wavelength-tunable optical pulse generation using an optical comb generator and a high resolution arrayed-waveguide grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.18(5), 679–681 (2006). [CrossRef]
  18. H. Tsuda, Y. Tanaka, T. Shioda, and T. Kurokawa, “Analog and digital optical pulse synthesizers using arrayed-waveguide gratings for high-speed optical signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol.26(6), 670–677 (2008). [CrossRef]
  19. S. Choi, N. Tamura, K. Kashiwagi, T. Shioda, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kurokawa, “Supercontinuum comb generation using optical pulse synthesizer and highly nonlinear dispersion-shifted fiber,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.48(9), 09LF01 (2009). [CrossRef]
  20. T. Ohta, N. Nishizawa, T. Ozawa, and K. Itoh, “Highly-sensitive and high-resolution all-fiber three-dimensional measurement system,” Appl. Opt.47(13), 2503–2509 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited