Monolithic InP receiver chip with a 90° hybrid and 56 GHz balanced photodiodes

doi:10.1364/OE.20.00B250

Monolithic InP receiver chip with a 90° hybrid and 56 GHz balanced photodiodes

Patrick Runge, Stefan Schubert, Angela Seeger, Klemens Janiak, Jens Stephan, Dirk Trommer, Patrick Domburg, and Mads Lønstrup Nielsen »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 26, pp. B250-B255 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.00B250

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1859 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Full Text
Article Info
References (7)
Cited By
Figures (9)
Metrics

Abstract

We demonstrate a monolithically integrated quadrature coherent receiver photonic integrated curcuit on an InP substrate with a 90° optical hybrid and two balanced 56 GHz pin-photodetectors on chip level and as a packaged device. The presented devices enable the use of 56/64 Gbaud dual polarisation 16-QAM signals either in the C-band or the L-band.

1. Introduction

In recent 100 G Ethernet long haul optical fiber transmission links 112 Gbits/s dual-polarisation quadrature phase-shift keying (DP-QPSK) is the commonly used modulation format. Typical receiver frontends of these transmission links are intradyne coherent receiver with a 90° hybrid converting the phase modulated signal into an amplitude modulation detectable by the photodiodes. There are several realisations of such a receiver, e.g. monolithic [1

C. R. Doerr, L. L. Buhl, Y. Baeyens, R. Aroca, S. Chandrasekhar, X. Liu, L. Chen, and Y.-K. Chen, “Packaged Monolithic Silicon 112 Gb/s Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23, 762–764 (2011). [CrossRef]

, 2

C. R. Doerr, L. Zhang, P. J. Winzer, N. Weimann, V. Houtsma, T.-C. Hu, N. J. Sauer, L. L. Buhl, D. T. Neilson, S. Chandrasekhar, and Y. K. Chen, “Monolithic InP Dual-Polarization and Dual-Quadrature Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23, 694–696 (2011). [CrossRef]

] or hybrid implementations [3

A. Beling, N. Ebel, A. Matiss, G. Unterbörsch, M. Nölle, J. K. Fischer, J. Hilt, L. Molle, C. Schubert, F. Verluise, and L. Fulop, “Fully-Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver Module for 100 G DP-QPSK,” Proc. OFC’11 , OML5 (2011).

K. Murata, T. Saida, K. Sano, I. Ogawa, H. Fukuyama, R. Kasahara, Y. Muramoto, H. Nosaka, S. Tsunashima, T. Mizuno, H. Tanobe, K. Hattori, T. Yoshimatsu, H. Kawakami, and E. Yoshida, “100 Gbit/s PDM-QPSK Coherent Receiver with Wide Dynamic Range and Excellent Common-mode Rejection Ratio,” Proc. ECOC’11, Tu.3.LeSaleve.1 (2011).

–5

T. Richter, M. Kroh, J. Wang, A. Theurer, C. Zawadzki, Z. Zhang, N. Keil, A. Steffan, and C. Schubert, “Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver on Polymer PLC for QPSK and QAM signals,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.1 (2012).

]. Besides good performance, a further demand of the industry to all these devices is low production cost and compact devices size.

In order to fulfill the still increasing demand of capacity in communication traffic, 400 G Ethernet is expected to be the data rate of the next generation. Moreover, it can be supposed that both modulation and baud rate will increase in order to achieve the required 448 Gbit/s. A possible candidate for the modulation format is dual-polarisation 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (16-QAM) with 56 Gbaud. In general, the 90° hybrids in combination with highly linear pin-photodiodes of the receivers photonic integrated circuit (PIC) can be used without major changes for 16-QAM [5

]. Regarding the baud rate, the photodiode and the electrical interface have to be adapted without decreasing responsivity which is an important parameter for high sensitivity and high signal to noise ratios. The simultaneous increase of bandwidth and responsivity is challenging because the high responsivity requires a large active region area, which in turn increases the photodiode capacity, resulting in a reduced bandwidth of the photodiode. For the hybrid implementations of the receiver PIC, where the photodiodes are attached onto the waveguides [4

, 5

] the assembly becomes less tolerant due to smaller active areas and thus will increase the production costs. Although monolithically integrated waveguide photodiodes have been presented for silicon on insulator and silica substrates [1

, 6

C. T. DeRose, D. C. Trotter, W. A. Zortman, A. L. Starbuck, M. Fisher, M. R. Watts, and P. S. Davids, “Ultra compact 45 GHz CMOS compatible Germanium waveguide photodiode with low dark current,” Opt. Express 19, 24897–24904 (2011). [CrossRef]

, 7

H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, R. Kou, H. Shinojima, K. Yamada, T. Yamada, H. Kimura, Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, and S. Mutoh, “Monolithic integration of silica-based AWG filter and germanium photodiodes for one-chip WDM receiver,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.6 (2012).

] the photodiodes either suffer from low responsivity in the C-band and L-band, or their dark current is increased because of the applied stressors, thus increasing the noise floor.

In this contribution, we demonstrate a monolithic InP based receiver chip with a 90° hybrid and 56 GHz photodiodes. The fabricated devices are supposed to operate with 56 Gbaud RZ-16-QAM signals in the C-band and L-band. Moreover, the performance of the packaged chips with a hybrid integrated polarisation beam splitter (PBS) is presented, extending the performance of the packaged receiver for polarisation diversity modulation schemes.

2. Design and fabrication of the PIC

A top-view SEM image of the integrated InP photonic chip is shown in Fig. 1. The receiver PIC includes two full spot-size fiber taper (one for the data signal S and one for the local oscillator LO), an optical 90° hybrid, and two balanced photodiodes.

Fig. 1 SEM photograph of the receiver PIC; chip size of the receiver PIC: 3.5 mm²

A DC reverse voltage is applied to the array of photodiodes using an integrated bias network consisting of integrated capacitors and resistors (Fig. 2). As currently, no 56 Gbaud 4-arrays of transimpedance amplifiers are available, we chose a balanced detector scheme with 50 Ω terminated RF lines to guide the RF signal directly to devices outside of the package.

Fig. 2 Conceptual setup of the receiver PIC with 90° hybrid and photodiodes with biasts and 50 Ω terminated RF lines

Due to the balanced photodiode configuration, the fabricated chips have a size of only 3.5 mm². The compact size results in a maximum skew between the different photodiode channels of only 0.2 ps.

A chip prototype has been fabricated on a 3 inch InP wafer. Semi-insulating InGaAsP/InP waveguide layers and the doped detector layers are grown by single-step MOVPE. The structuring of the photodiodes and the waveguides is done by etching. The waveguide integrated pin photodiodes comprise an InGaAs absorption layer and heterostructure contact layers in order to allow high responsivities and high bandwidths. The optical facet of the chips is AR coated to reduce insertion loss and to avoid back reflection into the local oscillator.

3. Measurement results of the PIC

For the following measurements the port definition and nomenclature from Fig. 2 will be used. The inphase component of the signal and the quadrature component of the signal are defined as I = I_P − I_N and Q = Q_P − Q_N. Important parameters for the envisaged system operation can already be obtained from single fibre input measurements:

the minimum responsivities of the photodiodes
the imbalance

${IMB}_{TE} = 10 log (\frac{Σ R_{TE, S i}}{Σ R_{TE, LO i}}) i = I_{P}, I_{N}, Q_{P}, Q_{N}$
the uniformity

$Δ R_{TE} = 10 log (\frac{max (R_{TE})}{min (R_{TE})})$
the common mode rejection ratio (CMRR)

$\begin{array}{l} {CMRR}_{TE, j I} = 20 log (| \frac{R_{TE, j I_{P}} - R_{TE, j I_{N}}}{R_{TE, j I_{P}} + R_{TE, j I_{N}}} |) j = S, LO \\ {CMRR}_{TE, j Q} = 20 log (| \frac{R_{TE, j Q_{P}} - R_{TE, j Q_{N}}}{R_{TE, j Q_{P}} + R_{TE, j Q_{N}}} |) j = S, LO \end{array}$
the dark current of the photodiodes
the small signal bandwidth of the photodiodes.

The imbalance can be regarded as figure of merit for the imperfection between the signal input and the local oscillator input. The uniformity represents the maximum pitch of the different optical paths and the CMRR is a figure of merit for the differential output signals (I, Q).

Figure 3 shows the responsivity as a function of the wavelength for a C-band device and a L-band device. For all four photodiodes responsivities of 0.12 A/W can be achieved at the centre of the C-band and the L-band, respectively.

Fig. 3 Measured responsivity for a C-band chip (left) and for a L-band chip (right); positive in-phase channel (I_P), negative in-phase channel (I_N), positive quadrature channel (Q_P), negative quadrature channel (Q_N)

The measurements mainly related to the performance of the 90° hybrid are presented in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. An excellent imbalance, uniformity below 0.75 dB and a CMRR better 21 dB can be obtained over the entire C-band and L-band, respectively.

Fig. 4 Measured imbalance (left) and uniformity of the signal and the local oscillator input (right) for a C-band chip and a L-band chip; indices S and LO denote the signal input and the local oscillator input

Fig. 5 Measured common mode rejection ratio for a C-band chip and a L-band device

In Fig. 6 the dark currents of the photodiodes of the fabricated chips are shown. Low dark currents of less than 1 nA for a reverse bias voltage of 3 V are obtained. The measured bandwidth of the photodiode is plotted in Fig. 6. For all four photodiodes bandwidths of 56 GHz are obtained.

Fig. 6 Dark current measurements (left) and frequency response measurements (right) for all four photodiodes of the receiver PIC

4. Design of the module

Packaging the receiver PIC and including a free space optic with a low loss polarisation beam splitter (PBS), the performance of the device is extended to dual-polarisation modulation formats. Figure 7 depicts the conceptual setup of such a module. The two hybrid integrated PBS split the signal and the local oscillator into their polarisation components so that they can be routed to their designated 90° hybrid.

Fig. 7 Conceptual setup of the packaged chip (left) and a photograph of the package (right)

A photograph of a package is presented in Fig. 7. A CCRx compatible footprint was chosen for the package to provide high comparability for nowadays applications. Nevertheless, due to the small chip size even smaller form factors of the package are possible. In order to route the RF output signals to a following device, the package has a GPPO^® interface.

5. Measurement results of the module

The measured polarisation extinction ratio (PER) for the signal input of the packaged device is shown in Fig. 8. The excellent behaviour of more than 30 dB over the complete bands could be achieved for C-band and L-band modules, respectively.

Fig. 8 Measured PER for a C-band module and a L-band module

The RF performance of the packaged device is characterised by the RF measurements presented in Fig. 9. Typically, a CMRR of more than 15 dB is obtained at 40 GHz. A differential frequency response with its 3 dB-limit of the power has also been measured at 47.5 GHz (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9 Measured CMRR over the excitation frequency (left) and differential frequency response measurement (right)

6. Conclusion

We proposed and realised a monolithic InP coherent receiver chips with optical 90° hybrid and photodiodes for C-band and L-band. The photodiodes show excellent performance regarding the responsivity, the dark current and the bandwidth. Thus, the performance of the receiver chips is sufficient for 56 GBaud QPSK data signals. Furthermore, the presented packaged devices have a hybrid integrated PBSs which extends the performance to dual polarisation modulation formats.

The presented coherent dual-polarisation optical front-ends can be regarded as a first step towards a fully integrated 400 G receiver. Moreover, the small chip size can result in smaller package sizes being also a step forward to next generation form factors.

References and links

1.	C. R. Doerr, L. L. Buhl, Y. Baeyens, R. Aroca, S. Chandrasekhar, X. Liu, L. Chen, and Y.-K. Chen, “Packaged Monolithic Silicon 112 Gb/s Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23, 762–764 (2011). [CrossRef]
2.	C. R. Doerr, L. Zhang, P. J. Winzer, N. Weimann, V. Houtsma, T.-C. Hu, N. J. Sauer, L. L. Buhl, D. T. Neilson, S. Chandrasekhar, and Y. K. Chen, “Monolithic InP Dual-Polarization and Dual-Quadrature Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23, 694–696 (2011). [CrossRef]
3.	A. Beling, N. Ebel, A. Matiss, G. Unterbörsch, M. Nölle, J. K. Fischer, J. Hilt, L. Molle, C. Schubert, F. Verluise, and L. Fulop, “Fully-Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver Module for 100 G DP-QPSK,” Proc. OFC’11 , OML5 (2011).
4.	K. Murata, T. Saida, K. Sano, I. Ogawa, H. Fukuyama, R. Kasahara, Y. Muramoto, H. Nosaka, S. Tsunashima, T. Mizuno, H. Tanobe, K. Hattori, T. Yoshimatsu, H. Kawakami, and E. Yoshida, “100 Gbit/s PDM-QPSK Coherent Receiver with Wide Dynamic Range and Excellent Common-mode Rejection Ratio,” Proc. ECOC’11, Tu.3.LeSaleve.1 (2011).
5.	T. Richter, M. Kroh, J. Wang, A. Theurer, C. Zawadzki, Z. Zhang, N. Keil, A. Steffan, and C. Schubert, “Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver on Polymer PLC for QPSK and QAM signals,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.1 (2012).
6.	C. T. DeRose, D. C. Trotter, W. A. Zortman, A. L. Starbuck, M. Fisher, M. R. Watts, and P. S. Davids, “Ultra compact 45 GHz CMOS compatible Germanium waveguide photodiode with low dark current,” Opt. Express 19, 24897–24904 (2011). [CrossRef]
7.	H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, R. Kou, H. Shinojima, K. Yamada, T. Yamada, H. Kimura, Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, and S. Mutoh, “Monolithic integration of silica-based AWG filter and germanium photodiodes for one-chip WDM receiver,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.6 (2012).

OCIS Codes
(040.5160) Detectors : Photodetectors
(060.1660) Fiber optics and optical communications : Coherent communications
(250.3140) Optoelectronics : Integrated optoelectronic circuits

ToC Category:
Waveguide and Optoelectronic Devices

History
Original Manuscript: October 1, 2012
Revised Manuscript: November 1, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: November 1, 2012
Published: November 29, 2012

Virtual Issues
European Conference on Optical Communication 2012 (2012) Optics Express

Citation
Patrick Runge, Stefan Schubert, Angela Seeger, Klemens Janiak, Jens Stephan, Dirk Trommer, Patrick Domburg, and Mads Lønstrup Nielsen, "Monolithic InP receiver chip with a 90° hybrid and 56 GHz balanced photodiodes," Opt. Express 20, B250-B255 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-26-B250

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

C. R. Doerr, L. L. Buhl, Y. Baeyens, R. Aroca, S. Chandrasekhar, X. Liu, L. Chen, and Y.-K. Chen, “Packaged Monolithic Silicon 112 Gb/s Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.23, 762–764 (2011). [CrossRef]
C. R. Doerr, L. Zhang, P. J. Winzer, N. Weimann, V. Houtsma, T.-C. Hu, N. J. Sauer, L. L. Buhl, D. T. Neilson, S. Chandrasekhar, and Y. K. Chen, “Monolithic InP Dual-Polarization and Dual-Quadrature Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.23, 694–696 (2011). [CrossRef]
A. Beling, N. Ebel, A. Matiss, G. Unterbörsch, M. Nölle, J. K. Fischer, J. Hilt, L. Molle, C. Schubert, F. Verluise, and L. Fulop, “Fully-Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver Module for 100 G DP-QPSK,” Proc. OFC’11, OML5 (2011).
K. Murata, T. Saida, K. Sano, I. Ogawa, H. Fukuyama, R. Kasahara, Y. Muramoto, H. Nosaka, S. Tsunashima, T. Mizuno, H. Tanobe, K. Hattori, T. Yoshimatsu, H. Kawakami, and E. Yoshida, “100 Gbit/s PDM-QPSK Coherent Receiver with Wide Dynamic Range and Excellent Common-mode Rejection Ratio,” Proc. ECOC’11, Tu.3.LeSaleve.1 (2011).
T. Richter, M. Kroh, J. Wang, A. Theurer, C. Zawadzki, Z. Zhang, N. Keil, A. Steffan, and C. Schubert, “Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver on Polymer PLC for QPSK and QAM signals,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.1 (2012).
C. T. DeRose, D. C. Trotter, W. A. Zortman, A. L. Starbuck, M. Fisher, M. R. Watts, and P. S. Davids, “Ultra compact 45 GHz CMOS compatible Germanium waveguide photodiode with low dark current,” Opt. Express19, 24897–24904 (2011). [CrossRef]
H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, R. Kou, H. Shinojima, K. Yamada, T. Yamada, H. Kimura, Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, and S. Mutoh, “Monolithic integration of silica-based AWG filter and germanium photodiodes for one-chip WDM receiver,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.6 (2012).

Aroca, R.
Baeyens, Y.
Beling, A.
Buhl, L. L.
Chandrasekhar, S.
Chen, L.
Chen, Y. K.
Chen, Y.-K.
Davids, P. S.
DeRose, C. T.
Doerr, C. R.
Ebel, N.
Fischer, J. K.
Fisher, M.
Fukuyama, H.
Fulop, L.
Hattori, K.
Hilt, J.
Houtsma, V.
Hu, T.-C.
Ishikawa, Y.
Kasahara, R.
Kawakami, H.
Keil, N.
Kimura, H.
Kou, R.
Kroh, M.
Liu, X.
Matiss, A.
Mizuno, T.
Molle, L.
Muramoto, Y.
Murata, K.
Mutoh, S.
Neilson, D. T.
Nishi, H.
Nölle, M.
Nosaka, H.
Ogawa, I.
Richter, T.
Saida, T.
Sano, K.
Sauer, N. J.
Schubert, C.
Shinojima, H.
Starbuck, A. L.
Steffan, A.
Tanobe, H.
Theurer, A.
Trotter, D. C.
Tsuchizawa, T.
Tsunashima, S.
Unterbörsch, G.
Verluise, F.
Wada, K.
Wang, J.
Watts, M. R.
Weimann, N.
Winzer, P. J.
Yamada, K.
Yamada, T.
Yoshida, E.
Yoshimatsu, T.
Zawadzki, C.
Zhang, L.
Zhang, Z.
Zortman, W. A.

IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.

C. R. Doerr, L. L. Buhl, Y. Baeyens, R. Aroca, S. Chandrasekhar, X. Liu, L. Chen, and Y.-K. Chen, “Packaged Monolithic Silicon 112 Gb/s Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.23, 762–764 (2011). [CrossRef]
C. R. Doerr, L. Zhang, P. J. Winzer, N. Weimann, V. Houtsma, T.-C. Hu, N. J. Sauer, L. L. Buhl, D. T. Neilson, S. Chandrasekhar, and Y. K. Chen, “Monolithic InP Dual-Polarization and Dual-Quadrature Coherent Receiver,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.23, 694–696 (2011). [CrossRef]

Opt. Express

C. T. DeRose, D. C. Trotter, W. A. Zortman, A. L. Starbuck, M. Fisher, M. R. Watts, and P. S. Davids, “Ultra compact 45 GHz CMOS compatible Germanium waveguide photodiode with low dark current,” Opt. Express19, 24897–24904 (2011). [CrossRef]

Proc. OFC’11

A. Beling, N. Ebel, A. Matiss, G. Unterbörsch, M. Nölle, J. K. Fischer, J. Hilt, L. Molle, C. Schubert, F. Verluise, and L. Fulop, “Fully-Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver Module for 100 G DP-QPSK,” Proc. OFC’11, OML5 (2011).

Other

K. Murata, T. Saida, K. Sano, I. Ogawa, H. Fukuyama, R. Kasahara, Y. Muramoto, H. Nosaka, S. Tsunashima, T. Mizuno, H. Tanobe, K. Hattori, T. Yoshimatsu, H. Kawakami, and E. Yoshida, “100 Gbit/s PDM-QPSK Coherent Receiver with Wide Dynamic Range and Excellent Common-mode Rejection Ratio,” Proc. ECOC’11, Tu.3.LeSaleve.1 (2011).
T. Richter, M. Kroh, J. Wang, A. Theurer, C. Zawadzki, Z. Zhang, N. Keil, A. Steffan, and C. Schubert, “Integrated Polarization-Diversity Coherent Receiver on Polymer PLC for QPSK and QAM signals,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.1 (2012).
H. Nishi, T. Tsuchizawa, R. Kou, H. Shinojima, K. Yamada, T. Yamada, H. Kimura, Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, and S. Mutoh, “Monolithic integration of silica-based AWG filter and germanium photodiodes for one-chip WDM receiver,” Proc. OFC’12, OW3G.6 (2012).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper