Room-temperature continuous-wave operation of lateral current injection wavelength-scale embedded active-region photonic-crystal laser

doi:10.1364/OE.20.003773

Room-temperature continuous-wave operation of lateral current injection wavelength-scale embedded active-region photonic-crystal laser

Shinji Matsuo, Koji Takeda, Tomonari Sato, Masaya Notomi, Akihiko Shinya, Kengo Nozaki, Hideaki Taniyama, Koichi Hasebe, and Takaaki Kakitsuka »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 3773-3780 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.003773

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1093 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Device structure and fabrication
3. Device characteristics
4. Conclusion
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (23)
Cited By
Figures (5)
Metrics

Abstract

We have developed a wavelength-scale embedded active-region photonic-crystal laser using lateral p-i-n structure. Zn diffusion and Si ion implantation are used for p- and n-type doping. Room-temperature continuous-wave lasing behavior is clearly observed from the injection current dependence of the output power, 3dB-bandwidth of the peak, and lasing wavelength. The threshold current is 390 μA and the estimated effective threshold current is 9.4 μA. The output power in output waveguide is 1.82 μW for a 2.0-mA current injection. These results indicate that the embedded active-region structure effectively reduce the thermal resistance. Ultrasmall electrically driven lasers are an important step towards on-chip photonic network applications.

1. Introduction

The development of room-temperature (RT) continuous-wave (CW) operated semiconductor lasers is very promising in relation to progress on optical communication systems. In 1970, the first RT CW operated edge-emitting semiconductor lasers were developed by using a double-heterostructure in a GaAs/AlGaAs material system [1

I. Hayashi, M. B. Panish, P. W. Foy, and S. Sumski, “Junction lasers which operate continuously at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 17(3), 109–111 (1970). [CrossRef]

, 2

Zh. I. Alferov, V. M. Andreev, D. Z. Garbuzov, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, E. P. Morozov, E. L. Portnoi, and V. G. Trofim, “Investigation of the influence of the AlAs–GaAs heterostructure parameters on the laser threshold current and the realization of continuous emission at room temperature,” Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. 4, 1826 (1970).

]. These lasers are widely used for telecommunication networks ranging from backbone to access networks. In 1988, the CW operation of a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) was demonstrated at RT [3

F. Koyama, S. Kinoshita, and K. Iga, “Room-temperature continuous wave lasing characteristics of a GaAs vertical cavity surface-emitting laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(3), 221–222 (1989). [CrossRef]

]. A reduction of the active volume enables us to reduce the power consumption of the transmitter, which means that an optical transmission system has many advantages compared with its electric counterpart such as data transmission speed and power consumption, even over shorter transmission distances. Therefore, VCSELs are widely used for datacom networks ranging from intra-systems, such as data centers and super-computers, to board-to-board interconnects.

In this context, further reduction of the active volume opens up a novel application area for optical communication systems, namely off-chip and on-chip networks for silicon CMOS. For example, an on-chip photonic network that is integrated with silicon CMOS has attracted a lot of attention because it shows promise as regards overcoming the bandwidth and power consumption limits faced by on-chip electrical interconnects [4

Y. Vlasov, W. M. J. Green, and F. Xia, “High-throughput silicon nanophotonic wavelength-insensitive switch for on-chip optical networks,” Nat. Photonics 2(4), 242–246 (2008). [CrossRef]

–7

S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, C.-H. Chen, K. Nozaki, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, “20-Gbit/s directly modulated photonic crystal nanocavity laser with ultra-low power consumption,” Opt. Express 19(3), 2242–2250 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For this photonic integrated circuit (PIC), the density requirement is a critical issue as several thousand lasers, photodetectors, and switches must be integrated on a single chip. Thus the device operating energy should be reduced and the target device energy for the transmitter side should be less than 10 fJ/bit [6

D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical Interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]

], considering the demands for future interconnects in CMOS based on the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors [8

http://www.itrs.net/Links/2007ITRS/Home2007.htm.

]. In addition, it is well known that the use of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) technology greatly increases the total bandwidth and reduces the total power consumption of a CMOS chip [5

A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. P. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]

, 9

M. Haurylau, G. Chen, H. Chen, J. Zhang, N. A. Nelson, D. H. Albonesi, E. G. Friedman, and P. M. Fauchet, “On-chip optical interconnect roadmap: challenges and critical directions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12(6), 1699–1705 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. Thus, the laser requires wavelength controllability because it should oscillate the required wavelength at any position on the chip.

In terms of satisfying the above requirements, lasers incorporating wavelength-scale photonic-crystal (PhC) cavities are ideal [10

M. Notomi, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, S. Matsuo, E. Kuramochi, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and H. Sumikura, “Low power nanophotonic devices based on photonic crystals towards dense photonic network on chip,” IET Circuits, Devices Syst. 5(2), 84–93 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. A PhC is an artificial structure having periodic modulation in refractive index which can have a photonic band gap [11

M. Notomi, “Strong light confinement with periodicity,” Proc. IEEE 99, 1768–1779 (2011).

]. Because of the strong light confinement achieved through the existence of photonic bandgaps, ultrasmall (comparable to the wavelength) and high-Q (1 × 10⁶) cavities can be realized in PhCs [12

T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, A. Shinya, and H. Taniyama, “Trapping and delaying photons for one nanosecond in an ultrasmall high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Nat. Photonics 1(1), 49–52 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 13

Y. Takahashi, H. Hagino, Y. Tanaka, B.-S. Song, T. Asano, and S. Noda, “High-Q nanocavity with a 2-ns photon lifetime,” Opt. Express 15(25), 17206–17213 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, the RT CW operation of an electrically driven wavelength-scale PhC laser has not been achieved. Only RT pulsed operation has been demonstrated in a wavelength-scale PhC laser by employing a vertical p-i-n junction and a current post [14

H. G. Park, S. H. Kim, S. H. Kwon, Y. G. Ju, J. K. Yang, J. H. Baek, S. B. Kim, and Y. H. Lee, “Electrically driven single-cell photonic crystal laser,” Science 305(5689), 1444–1447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 15

M.-K. Seo, K.-Y. Jeong, J.-K. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, H.-G. Park, and S.-B. Kim, “Low threshold current single-cell hexapole mode photonic crystal laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(17), 171122 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. However, the current post limits the quality (Q) factor of the cavity (threshold Q-factor (Q_th) ~3400), which prevents CW operation. Furthermore, a PhC laser consisting of a vertical p-i-n junction and a current post is unsuitable for constructing a large-scale PIC on a CMOS chip. In this context, PhC lasers with an air-bridge and lateral current injection structure have been demonstrated [16

C. M. Long, A. V. Giannopoulos, and K. D. Choquette, “Modified spontaneous emission from laterally injected photonic crystal emitter,” Electron. Lett. 45(4), 227–228 (2009). [CrossRef]

, 17

B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. However, these devices did not realize laser oscillation even during pulsed operation at RT because their all-active structure, in which a two-dimensional photonic slab consists of a single active region, provides no carrier confinement structure and exhibits high thermal resistance.

To overcome these problems, we have developed a wavelength (lambda)-scale embedded active-region PhC (LEAP) laser, in which wavelength-scale InGaAsP-based active region is embedded with an InP based line-defect PhC waveguide [18

S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, T. Kakitsuka, K. Nozaki, T. Segawa, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Notomi, “High-speed ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic-crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit transmitted,” Nat. Photonics 4(9), 648–654 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. This structure allows us to greatly reduce the thermal resistance and realize the strong confinement of both photons and carriers in the active region, because the thermal conductivity and bandgap of the InP layer are larger than those of the InGaAsP layer. Thus, we have demonstrated a low threshold input power of 6.8 μW with a Q_th of 14,300, an output power of −10.3 dBm, and 20-Gbit/s direct modulation with 8.76 fJ/bit by optical pumping [7

]. Furthermore, we controlled the lasing wavelength over a wavelength range of more than 100 nm by controlling the lattice constant of the PhC [19

K. Takeda, T. Sato, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, C.-H. Chen, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, and S. Matsuo, “80°C continuous wave operation of photonic-crystal nanocavity lasers,” 23rd International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, Berlin, May 2011.

The purpose of the present study is, therefore, the development of a CW operated LEAP laser using lateral current injection at RT. The modulated line-defect cavity [11

M. Notomi, “Strong light confinement with periodicity,” Proc. IEEE 99, 1768–1779 (2011).

, 18

] is suitable for making a lateral p-i-n junction. We have reported a successful fabrication of ultrahigh-Q nanocavities based on this design with lateral p-i-n junctions in Si photonic crystals by employing ion implantation [20

T. Tanabe, K. Nishiguchi, E. Kuramochi, and M. Notomi, “Low power and fast electro-optic silicon modulator with lateral p-i-n embedded photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22505–22513 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. To fabricate a lateral p-i-n current junction in InP photonic crystals, here we employ Zn diffusion and Si ion implantation respectively for p- and n-type doping into an i-InP layer. Room-temperature continuous-wave lasing behavior is clearly observed from the injection current dependence of the output power, 3dB-bandwidth of the peak, and lasing wavelength. The threshold current is 390 μA and the estimated effective threshold current is 9.4 μA. The output power in output waveguide is 1.82 μW for a 2.0-mA current injection. These results indicate that the embedded active-region structure enables us to reduce the thermal resistance of the device and confine both the carrier and photon within wavelength-scale cavity.

2. Device structure and fabrication

Figure 1(a) shows the schematic diagram of LEAP laser and Fig. 1(b) shows cross-sectional view of the device. We place an extremely small embedded active region in a straight-line defect waveguide in an InP-PhC slab. This structure allows us to greatly reduce the thermal resistance and realize the strong confinement of both photons and carriers in the active region, because the thermal conductivity and bandgap of the InP layer are larger than those of the InGaAsP layer [18

]. Furthermore, a cavity based on a line-defect waveguide is expected to provide an extraordinarily high-Q (Q>1 million) nanocavity with a mode volume (V_eff) of ~(λ/n)³ by implementing the slight local structural or reflective index modulation of a line-defect waveguide [11

M. Notomi, “Strong light confinement with periodicity,” Proc. IEEE 99, 1768–1779 (2011).

, 21

M. Notomi and H. Taniyama, “On-demand ultrahigh-Q cavity formation and photon pinning via dynamic waveguide tuning,” Opt. Express 16(23), 18657–18666 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The output waveguide is placed in an offset position with respectto the line-defect waveguide including the active region to obtain effective coupling between the cavity and output waveguide [7

Fig. 1 Schematic diagrams of LEAP laser with lateral current injection structure: (a) top view, (b) cross-sectional view. Wavelength-scale InGaAsP-based active region is embedded with an InP based line-defect PhC waveguide

To fabricate a lateral p-i-n current injection structure, we employ Zn diffusion and Si ion implantation respectively for p- and n-type doping into an i-InP layer. Silicon ions were implanted for n-type doping with an energy of 240 keV and a dose of 1.2 × 10¹⁴ cm⁻² and photoresist was used to pattern the n-type doping region. After removing the photoresist, we deposited a SiO₂ layer. The sample was then annealed at 700°C for 3 min to activate the dopants. Then, a p-type InP layer was formed by Zn diffusion with 550°C for 1 min. A patterned SiO₂ layer was used to define the p-type region. A fabrication process that employs impurity implantation and diffusion will result in greater performance repeatability and increased yield because it is the same fabrication technique that is used for silicon CMOS.

Figure 2(a) shows a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) image of our fabricated LEAP laser with an air-bridge structure. We use a 3-quantum well structure for the active region with 2.6 × 0.3 × 0.15 μm³ (0.12 μm³). The active region was embedded within line-defect PhC waveguide with flat surface, which is important to obtain high-Q cavity. The output waveguide is placed in an offset position with respect to the line-defect including the active region. The cavity design is basically same as previous developed optically pumped laser in ref. 7

, in which we achieved a high external differential quantum efficiency of 53% and ultra-low energy cost of 8.76 fJ/bit with 20-Gbit/s NRZ signal. However, main purpose of this manuscript is to achieve the electrically driven laser operated at RT CW condition. In this context, the reduction of the threshold current is the most promising way because RT CW operation of the laser is suppressed by the increase of the active region temperature due to the current injection. Thus, compared with the device in ref. 7

, we decrease the active region length to reduce the threshold current and increase the Q-factor to reduce the threshold current density. Therefore, the output waveguide is positioned further away from the cavity than with the previous device to increase the Q-factor. The output waveguide consists of a 3-μm wide waveguide, a taper waveguide and the line-defect of the PhC. The field profile of the cavity mode obtained by using a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) calculation is shown in Fig. 2(b). Q-factor was ~4200 and V_eff was ~0.15 μm³. This clearly shows that the embedded active region largely overlaps the cavity mode profile.

Fig. 2 (a) Cross-sectional SEM image of fabricated device. The active region was 2.6 x 0.3 x 0.15 μm³ and the air hole was 220 nm in diameter. Zn diffusion and Si ion implantation were used for p- and n-type doping into an i-InP layer. (b) Field profile of the cavity mode obtained by using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) calculation. The Q-factor was ~4200 and V_eff was ~0.15 μm³.

3. Device characteristics

The fabricated electrically driven LEAP laser is CW operated at RT. The light and voltage versus current characteristic is shown in Fig. 3(a) . The laser output light from an output line-defect waveguide was collected into a single-mode fiber. We used a tapered waveguide from the output line-defect waveguide to a 3-μm-wide waveguide. We estimated a coupling loss of　10 dB between the optical fiber and the line-defect waveguide [7

]. The device exhibits a clear kink at a threshold of 390 μA. The output power coupled to the output line-defect waveguide was 1.82 μW when the injection current was 2.0 mA. The images captured using an IR camera are shown in Fig. 3(b) and (c) for injection current of 0.4 and 2.0 mA, respectively. The output lights are observed from the cavity to the surface normal direction and the facet of the output waveguide because the output waveguide has no anti-reflection coating. As described in section 2, the coupling efficiency with the output waveguide was decreased and therefore the output from the surface normal direction was increased. This could be improved by optimizing the cavity design. In addition, as shown in Fig. 3(b) and 3(c), electroluminescent light was observed under the p-contact electrode (lower-side of electrode). Since the image was monitored through the 1450-nm optical long-pass filter, the light was emitted from the InGaAs sacrificial layer due to the current leakage. This means that undoped InP buffer layer shown in Fig. 1(b) cannot suppress the current through the InGaAs sacrificial layer. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the injection current was increased from bias voltage of 0.4 V, which agree with the built-in potential of the InGaAs layer.

Fig. 3 (a) Light and voltage versus current characteristic of LEAP laser for RT CW operation. The device exhibits a clear kink at a threshold of 390 μA. The output power coupled to output line-defect waveguide was increased to 1.82 μW. (b, c) Images captured using IR camera for injection currents of 0.4 and 2.0 mA. The output lights are observed from the cavity to surface normal direction and the facet of the output waveguide.

The injection current dependence of the 3-dB bandwidth of the peak, and the lasing wavelength are shown in Fig. 4(a) . Below the threshold region (less than 390 μA), the 3-dB bandwidth decreased as the injection current increased because the loss in the cavity decreased. The lasing wavelength also decreased as the injection current increased because the generated carriers induced band filling and plasma effects, which led to a reduction in the refractive index of the cavity and shortened the cavity resonance wavelength. In the threshold region, where the laser field underwent a phase transition, the linewidth broadened with increasing output power as the gain-refractive index coupling rapidly started to influence the linewidth [22

G. Björk, A. Karlsson, and Y. Yamamoto, “On the linewidth of microcavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 60(3), 304–306 (1992). [CrossRef]

]. The 3-dB bandwidth at the threshold was 0.035 nm, corresponding to a Q-factor of 44,600. Above the threshold region, the lasing wavelength was constant because the carrier density was clamped and the 3-dB bandwidth decreased with increasing input power. Our experimental results agreed with the calculated results [22

G. Björk, A. Karlsson, and Y. Yamamoto, “On the linewidth of microcavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 60(3), 304–306 (1992). [CrossRef]

], and we confirmed that our laser clearly showed lasing oscillation with RT CW operation.

Fig. 4 (a) Injection current dependence of the 3-dB bandwidth of the peak, and the lasing wavelength. In the threshold region around 0.4 mA, the linewidth broadened with increasing output power. The 3-dB bandwidth at the threshold was 0.035 nm, corresponding to a Q-factor of 44,600. (b) Light output change near the threshold region for electrical and optical pumping experiment. The output light was detected from the output waveguide for both measurements. The absorbed optical power (upper X-axis) is shifted to agree with the output power dependence of the injection current.

As shown in Fig. 3(b) and 3(c), the present device has large leakage current. To estimate the effective current input into the laser cavity, we measured the device characteristics by using optical pumping. Optical pumping measurements were performed using a laser diode (λ = 980 nm) as the excitation source. The pump laser beam was incident from the surface normal direction and focused to a 3-μm diameter spot on the sample surface with a microscope objective (50x, numerical aperture = 0.42). Since the absorption coefficient of the InP layer for 980 nm-pump light is negligible, we correctly estimated the absorbed optical power by using an absorption coefficient, α, of 14850 cm⁻¹ and an absorbed region ( = active region) of 0.25 x 0.3 x 0.15 μm³. The absorption coefficient α was calculated using the 6-band k·p analysis and the Fermi’s golden rule [23

S. L. Chuang, Physics of Optoelectronic Devices (John Willey & Sons, 1995).

]. The effective absorbed power, P_eff, is given by,

P_{eff} {=P}_{0} (1-exp(-Γαh))=0 .0314 \cdot P_{0} \begin{matrix}  \end{matrix}

(1)

where P₀ is the input power, Γ is the confinement factor, and h is the height of the active region. The confinement factor Γ is 0.143, which is the overlap between the absorption region and the Gaussian beam pump light. The reflection of the pump light was neglected. The experimental results are shown in Fig. 4(b), where the red and blue circles represent the experimental results for electrical and optical pumping, respectively. The output light was detected from the output waveguide in both measurements. Thus, the threshold output powers are the same because the optical property of the cavity is not related to the pumping methods and the required threshold gain must be the same for both optical and electrical pumping. Thus, we shifted the absorbed optical power (upper X-axis in Fig. 4(b)) to agree with the output power dependence of the injection current. This indicates that the effective absorbed optical power at the threshold was 11.8 μW, corresponding to an effective threshold current of 9.4 μA. The present device has a large leakage current through the InGaAs sacrificial layer. Thus, we can reduce the operating current by modifying the epitaxial structure and mask design. The threshold optical input power was larger than that of previously developed optical pumped lasers reported in ref. 7

(P_th = 3.2 μW). This is because the carrier absorption such as the intervalence band absorption and the free carrier absorption in the p-InP region increases the loss in the cavity. Thus, we need to optimize the device fabrication process.

The lasing spectrum was measured during RT pulsed operation to determine the increase in the active region temperature. Figure 5(a) shows the lasing spectra for pulse widths of 20 ns and 180 μs with a 200-μs repetition. The peak wavelength of the device operated with a 180-μs pulse is the same as the lasing wavelength operated under a 1.2-mA CW condition. Using the temperature dependence of the lasing wavelength for our laser (0.095 nm/K) [18

], we estimated the increase in the active region temperature caused by CW operation to be 7.1 K for an injection current of 1.2 mA. The lasing spectra and increase in the active region temperature for various injection currents ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mA are shown in Fig. 5(b) and (c), respectively. Although the active region temperature increases with the injection current, it was less than 15 K when the injection current was 2.0 mA.

Fig. 5 (a) Lasing spectra for pulse widths of 20 ns and 180 μs with 200-μs repetition. (b) Lasing spectra for various injection currents ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mA. (c) Active region temperature for various injection currents.

4. Conclusion

Lateral current injected LEAP laser realizes CW operation at RT, and exhibits a threshold current of 390 μA. If the leakage current flowing into the substrate and the InGaAs sacrificial layer is subtracted, the threshold current is estimated to be ~9.5 μA. We believe that a further reduction in the threshold current could be achieved by optimizing the fabrication process and epitaxial layer design. The output power in output waveguide is 1.82 μW for a 2.0-mA current injection. These results indicate that the combination of the embedded active-region structure and photonic crystal cavity is essential to obtain electrical driven ultrasmall cavity laser. Hence, the LEAP laser constitutes a new and exciting class of lasers, with the potential to employ data transmission in a silicon CMOS chip.

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Kato for fruitful discussions. We also thank K. Ishibashi and Y. Shouji for fabricating the device. Part of this work was supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

References and links

1.	I. Hayashi, M. B. Panish, P. W. Foy, and S. Sumski, “Junction lasers which operate continuously at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 17(3), 109–111 (1970). [CrossRef]
2.	Zh. I. Alferov, V. M. Andreev, D. Z. Garbuzov, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, E. P. Morozov, E. L. Portnoi, and V. G. Trofim, “Investigation of the influence of the AlAs–GaAs heterostructure parameters on the laser threshold current and the realization of continuous emission at room temperature,” Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. 4, 1826 (1970).
3.	F. Koyama, S. Kinoshita, and K. Iga, “Room-temperature continuous wave lasing characteristics of a GaAs vertical cavity surface-emitting laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(3), 221–222 (1989). [CrossRef]
4.	Y. Vlasov, W. M. J. Green, and F. Xia, “High-throughput silicon nanophotonic wavelength-insensitive switch for on-chip optical networks,” Nat. Photonics 2(4), 242–246 (2008). [CrossRef]
5.	A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. P. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]
6.	D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical Interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]
7.	S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, C.-H. Chen, K. Nozaki, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, “20-Gbit/s directly modulated photonic crystal nanocavity laser with ultra-low power consumption,” Opt. Express 19(3), 2242–2250 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.	http://www.itrs.net/Links/2007ITRS/Home2007.htm.
9.	M. Haurylau, G. Chen, H. Chen, J. Zhang, N. A. Nelson, D. H. Albonesi, E. G. Friedman, and P. M. Fauchet, “On-chip optical interconnect roadmap: challenges and critical directions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12(6), 1699–1705 (2006). [CrossRef]
10.	M. Notomi, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, S. Matsuo, E. Kuramochi, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and H. Sumikura, “Low power nanophotonic devices based on photonic crystals towards dense photonic network on chip,” IET Circuits, Devices Syst. 5(2), 84–93 (2011). [CrossRef]
11.	M. Notomi, “Strong light confinement with periodicity,” Proc. IEEE 99, 1768–1779 (2011).
12.	T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, A. Shinya, and H. Taniyama, “Trapping and delaying photons for one nanosecond in an ultrasmall high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Nat. Photonics 1(1), 49–52 (2007). [CrossRef]
13.	Y. Takahashi, H. Hagino, Y. Tanaka, B.-S. Song, T. Asano, and S. Noda, “High-Q nanocavity with a 2-ns photon lifetime,” Opt. Express 15(25), 17206–17213 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	H. G. Park, S. H. Kim, S. H. Kwon, Y. G. Ju, J. K. Yang, J. H. Baek, S. B. Kim, and Y. H. Lee, “Electrically driven single-cell photonic crystal laser,” Science 305(5689), 1444–1447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.	M.-K. Seo, K.-Y. Jeong, J.-K. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, H.-G. Park, and S.-B. Kim, “Low threshold current single-cell hexapole mode photonic crystal laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(17), 171122 (2007). [CrossRef]
16.	C. M. Long, A. V. Giannopoulos, and K. D. Choquette, “Modified spontaneous emission from laterally injected photonic crystal emitter,” Electron. Lett. 45(4), 227–228 (2009). [CrossRef]
17.	B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]
18.	S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, T. Kakitsuka, K. Nozaki, T. Segawa, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Notomi, “High-speed ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic-crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit transmitted,” Nat. Photonics 4(9), 648–654 (2010). [CrossRef]
19.	K. Takeda, T. Sato, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, C.-H. Chen, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, and S. Matsuo, “80°C continuous wave operation of photonic-crystal nanocavity lasers,” 23rd International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, Berlin, May 2011.
20.	T. Tanabe, K. Nishiguchi, E. Kuramochi, and M. Notomi, “Low power and fast electro-optic silicon modulator with lateral p-i-n embedded photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22505–22513 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21.	M. Notomi and H. Taniyama, “On-demand ultrahigh-Q cavity formation and photon pinning via dynamic waveguide tuning,” Opt. Express 16(23), 18657–18666 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22.	G. Björk, A. Karlsson, and Y. Yamamoto, “On the linewidth of microcavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 60(3), 304–306 (1992). [CrossRef]
23.	S. L. Chuang, Physics of Optoelectronic Devices (John Willey & Sons, 1995).

OCIS Codes
(250.5300) Optoelectronics : Photonic integrated circuits
(230.5298) Optical devices : Photonic crystals
(250.5960) Optoelectronics : Semiconductor lasers

ToC Category:
Optoelectronics

History
Original Manuscript: January 3, 2012
Revised Manuscript: January 25, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: January 25, 2012
Published: January 31, 2012

Citation
Shinji Matsuo, Koji Takeda, Tomonari Sato, Masaya Notomi, Akihiko Shinya, Kengo Nozaki, Hideaki Taniyama, Koichi Hasebe, and Takaaki Kakitsuka, "Room-temperature continuous-wave operation of lateral current injection wavelength-scale embedded active-region photonic-crystal laser," Opt. Express 20, 3773-3780 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-4-3773

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

I. Hayashi, M. B. Panish, P. W. Foy, and S. Sumski, “Junction lasers which operate continuously at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett.17(3), 109–111 (1970). [CrossRef]
Zh. I. Alferov, V. M. Andreev, D. Z. Garbuzov, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, E. P. Morozov, E. L. Portnoi, and V. G. Trofim, “Investigation of the influence of the AlAs–GaAs heterostructure parameters on the laser threshold current and the realization of continuous emission at room temperature,” Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn.4, 1826 (1970).
F. Koyama, S. Kinoshita, and K. Iga, “Room-temperature continuous wave lasing characteristics of a GaAs vertical cavity surface-emitting laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.55(3), 221–222 (1989). [CrossRef]
Y. Vlasov, W. M. J. Green, and F. Xia, “High-throughput silicon nanophotonic wavelength-insensitive switch for on-chip optical networks,” Nat. Photonics2(4), 242–246 (2008). [CrossRef]
A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. P. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput.57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]
D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical Interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]
S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, C.-H. Chen, K. Nozaki, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, “20-Gbit/s directly modulated photonic crystal nanocavity laser with ultra-low power consumption,” Opt. Express19(3), 2242–2250 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
http://www.itrs.net/Links/2007ITRS/Home2007.htm .
M. Haurylau, G. Chen, H. Chen, J. Zhang, N. A. Nelson, D. H. Albonesi, E. G. Friedman, and P. M. Fauchet, “On-chip optical interconnect roadmap: challenges and critical directions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.12(6), 1699–1705 (2006). [CrossRef]
M. Notomi, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, S. Matsuo, E. Kuramochi, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and H. Sumikura, “Low power nanophotonic devices based on photonic crystals towards dense photonic network on chip,” IET Circuits, Devices Syst.5(2), 84–93 (2011). [CrossRef]
M. Notomi, “Strong light confinement with periodicity,” Proc. IEEE99, 1768–1779 (2011).
T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, A. Shinya, and H. Taniyama, “Trapping and delaying photons for one nanosecond in an ultrasmall high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Nat. Photonics1(1), 49–52 (2007). [CrossRef]
Y. Takahashi, H. Hagino, Y. Tanaka, B.-S. Song, T. Asano, and S. Noda, “High-Q nanocavity with a 2-ns photon lifetime,” Opt. Express15(25), 17206–17213 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
H. G. Park, S. H. Kim, S. H. Kwon, Y. G. Ju, J. K. Yang, J. H. Baek, S. B. Kim, and Y. H. Lee, “Electrically driven single-cell photonic crystal laser,” Science305(5689), 1444–1447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M.-K. Seo, K.-Y. Jeong, J.-K. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, H.-G. Park, and S.-B. Kim, “Low threshold current single-cell hexapole mode photonic crystal laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.90(17), 171122 (2007). [CrossRef]
C. M. Long, A. V. Giannopoulos, and K. D. Choquette, “Modified spontaneous emission from laterally injected photonic crystal emitter,” Electron. Lett.45(4), 227–228 (2009). [CrossRef]
B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett.96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]
S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, T. Kakitsuka, K. Nozaki, T. Segawa, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Notomi, “High-speed ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic-crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit transmitted,” Nat. Photonics4(9), 648–654 (2010). [CrossRef]
K. Takeda, T. Sato, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, C.-H. Chen, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, and S. Matsuo, “80°C continuous wave operation of photonic-crystal nanocavity lasers,” 23rd International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, Berlin, May 2011.
T. Tanabe, K. Nishiguchi, E. Kuramochi, and M. Notomi, “Low power and fast electro-optic silicon modulator with lateral p-i-n embedded photonic crystal nanocavity,” Opt. Express17(25), 22505–22513 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. Notomi and H. Taniyama, “On-demand ultrahigh-Q cavity formation and photon pinning via dynamic waveguide tuning,” Opt. Express16(23), 18657–18666 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
G. Björk, A. Karlsson, and Y. Yamamoto, “On the linewidth of microcavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.60(3), 304–306 (1992). [CrossRef]
S. L. Chuang, Physics of Optoelectronic Devices (John Willey & Sons, 1995).

Appl. Phys. Lett.

I. Hayashi, M. B. Panish, P. W. Foy, and S. Sumski, “Junction lasers which operate continuously at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett.17(3), 109–111 (1970). [CrossRef]
F. Koyama, S. Kinoshita, and K. Iga, “Room-temperature continuous wave lasing characteristics of a GaAs vertical cavity surface-emitting laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.55(3), 221–222 (1989). [CrossRef]
M.-K. Seo, K.-Y. Jeong, J.-K. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, H.-G. Park, and S.-B. Kim, “Low threshold current single-cell hexapole mode photonic crystal laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.90(17), 171122 (2007). [CrossRef]
B. Ellis, T. Sarmiento, M. Mayer, B. Zhang, J. Harris, E. E. Haller, and J. Vuckovic, “Electrically pumped photonic crystal nanocavity light sources using a laterally doped p-i-n junction,” Appl. Phys. Lett.96(18), 181103 (2010). [CrossRef]
G. Björk, A. Karlsson, and Y. Yamamoto, “On the linewidth of microcavity laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.60(3), 304–306 (1992). [CrossRef]

Electron. Lett.

C. M. Long, A. V. Giannopoulos, and K. D. Choquette, “Modified spontaneous emission from laterally injected photonic crystal emitter,” Electron. Lett.45(4), 227–228 (2009). [CrossRef]

Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn.

Zh. I. Alferov, V. M. Andreev, D. Z. Garbuzov, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, E. P. Morozov, E. L. Portnoi, and V. G. Trofim, “Investigation of the influence of the AlAs–GaAs heterostructure parameters on the laser threshold current and the realization of continuous emission at room temperature,” Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn.4, 1826 (1970).

IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.

M. Haurylau, G. Chen, H. Chen, J. Zhang, N. A. Nelson, D. H. Albonesi, E. G. Friedman, and P. M. Fauchet, “On-chip optical interconnect roadmap: challenges and critical directions,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.12(6), 1699–1705 (2006). [CrossRef]

IEEE Trans. Comput.

A. Shacham, K. Bergman, and L. P. Carloni, “Photonic networks-on-chip for future generations of chip multiprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Comput.57(9), 1246–1260 (2008). [CrossRef]

IET Circuits, Devices Syst.

M. Notomi, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, S. Matsuo, E. Kuramochi, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and H. Sumikura, “Low power nanophotonic devices based on photonic crystals towards dense photonic network on chip,” IET Circuits, Devices Syst.5(2), 84–93 (2011). [CrossRef]

Nat. Photonics

T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, A. Shinya, and H. Taniyama, “Trapping and delaying photons for one nanosecond in an ultrasmall high-Q photonic-crystal nanocavity,” Nat. Photonics1(1), 49–52 (2007). [CrossRef]
S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, T. Kakitsuka, K. Nozaki, T. Segawa, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Notomi, “High-speed ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic-crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit transmitted,” Nat. Photonics4(9), 648–654 (2010). [CrossRef]
Y. Vlasov, W. M. J. Green, and F. Xia, “High-throughput silicon nanophotonic wavelength-insensitive switch for on-chip optical networks,” Nat. Photonics2(4), 242–246 (2008). [CrossRef]

Opt. Express

Proc. IEEE

M. Notomi, “Strong light confinement with periodicity,” Proc. IEEE99, 1768–1779 (2011).
D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical Interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE97(7), 1166–1185 (2009). [CrossRef]

Science

H. G. Park, S. H. Kim, S. H. Kwon, Y. G. Ju, J. K. Yang, J. H. Baek, S. B. Kim, and Y. H. Lee, “Electrically driven single-cell photonic crystal laser,” Science305(5689), 1444–1447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Other

K. Takeda, T. Sato, A. Shinya, K. Nozaki, C.-H. Chen, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, and S. Matsuo, “80°C continuous wave operation of photonic-crystal nanocavity lasers,” 23rd International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, Berlin, May 2011.
http://www.itrs.net/Links/2007ITRS/Home2007.htm .
S. L. Chuang, Physics of Optoelectronic Devices (John Willey & Sons, 1995).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper