Nonlinear couplers with tapered plasmonic waveguides

doi:10.1364/OE.20.009403

« Show journal navigation

Nonlinear couplers with tapered plasmonic waveguides

José R. Salgueiro and Yuri S. Kivshar »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 9, pp. 9403-9408 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.009403

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (810 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Model and approach
3. Results and discussions
4. Conclusions
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (23)
Cited By
Figures (4)
Metrics

Abstract

We suggest and demonstrate numerically that, by employing tapered waveguides in the geometry of a directional coupler, we can enhance dramatically the performance for optical switching of nonlinear plasmonic couplers operating at the nanoscale, overcoming the detrimental losses but preserving the subwavelength confinement. We demonstrate that, by an appropriate choice of the taper angle of the coupled metal-dielectric slot waveguides, we can compensate for the amplitude decrease and enhance the sharpness of the response for the switching operation.

1. Introduction

Recent advances in the study of light propagation in nanophotonic structures suggest many potential applications of subwavelength photonics for light manipulation at the nanoscale, with perspectives for creating functional optical devices [1

M. I. Brongersma and P. G. Krik, Eds. Surface Plasmon Nanophotonics (Springer, 2007), p. 268

S. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2007), p. 219

]. When the size of conventional optical devices is reduced to the nanoscale, the spatial confinement of light becomes inherently limited by diffraction. However, metal-dielectric structures allow to achieve subwavelength light confinement with surface plasmon polaritons, or plasmons [3

D. K. Gramotnev and S.I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit,” Nat. Photonics 4, 83–91 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. Using plasmons we can spatially confine and manipulate optical energy over distances much smaller than the wavelength.

Because of the strong enhancement of the field induced by the excitation of plasmons and increased nonlinearity, surface plasmons can be employed for the realization of a variety of nonlinear optical effects. In particular, several nonlinear optical processes have been demonstrated in plasmonic nanostructures, e.g. optical limiting and self-phase modulation in arrays of structured nanoparticles [4

N. C. Panoiu and R. M. Osgood, “Subwavelength nonlinear plasmonic nanowire,” Nano Lett. 4, 2427–2430 (2004). [CrossRef]

] or second-harmonic generation in nanostructured metal films [5

W. Fan, S. Zhang, N. C. Panoiu, A. Abdenour, S. Krishna, R. M. Osgood, K. J. Malloy, and S. R. J. Brueck, “Second harmonic generation from a nanopatterned isotropic nonlinear material,” Nano Lett. 6, 1027–1030 (2006). [CrossRef]

J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandke, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers, “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

The simplest plasmonic waveguide is an interface between metal and dielectric that supports surface plasmon polaritons. However, more complex systems as metal-dielectric-metal waveguides became attractive for more efficient excitation of plasmonic modes and for the loss reduction. In such guiding structures, light is tightly confined between two metal slabs, and it can be used for efficient nanofocusing [7

R. Yang, M. A. G. Abushagur, and Z. Lu, “Efficiently squeezing near infrared light into a 21 nm-by-24 nm nanospot,” Opt. Express 16, 20142–20148 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

A directional coupler is composed of two coupled waveguides, and for plasmonic waves it was studied theoretically and demonstrated experimentally for different geometries [8

D. K. Gramotnev, K. C. Vernon, and D. F. P. Pile, “Directional coupler using gap plasmon waveguides,” Appl. Phys. B 93, 99–106 (2008). [CrossRef]

–10

T. Holmgaard, Z. Chen, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, L. Markey, and A. Dereux, “Design and characterization of dielectric-loaded plasmonic directional couplers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27, 5521–5528 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Such couplers were suggested also for converting the modes of a dielectric waveguide into plasmonic modes propagating along a thin metal stripe [11

A. Degiron, S. Y. Cho, T. Tyler, N. M. Jokerst, and D. R. Smith, “Directional coupling between dielectric and long-range plasmon waveguides,” New J. Phys. 11, 015002 (2009). [CrossRef]

Nonlinear effects may provide novel functionalities for the light control in plasmonic structures. Nonlinear plasmonic waveguides were studied for a number of years (see, e.g., Refs. [12

V. M. Agranovich, V. S. Babichenko, and V. Y. Chernyak, “Nonlinear surface polaritons,” Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 512–515 (1980).

–14

D. Mihalache, G. I. Stegeman, C. T. Seaton, E. M. Wright, R. Zanoni, A. D. Boardman, and T. Twardowski, “Exact dispersion relations for transverse magnetic polarized guided waves at a nonlinear interface,” Opt. Lett. 12, 187–189 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]), and it was recently shown that nonlinear slot waveguides created by a nonlinear dielectric slab sandwiched between two metals may support subwavelength nonlinear guided modes of different symmetries [15

A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic slot waveguides,” Opt. Express 16, 21209–21214 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], including a novel type of asymmetric modes which is important for nonlinear switching, which is the application we are considering for the directional coupler in this paper. If the length of the coupler is adjusted to a beat length the device has two different output states depending whether the input signal is over or below certain power threshold, and this means that the signal can be optically switched from one channel to the other just controlling its power. It was already shown that couplers formed by a pair of plasmonic slot waveguides may demonstrate all-optical switching at the distances of few tenths of nanometers [16

J. R. Salgueiro and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 081106 (2010). [CrossRef]

Here we demonstrate that tapered waveguides can be employed for overcoming the effect of losses amplifying the field amplitude as happens for isolated plasmonic waveguides [17

A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, A. A. Zharov, D. K. Gramotnev, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear nanofocusing in tapered plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 116804 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–19

S. I. Bozhevolnyi and K. V. Nerkararyan, “Adiabatic nanofocusing of channel plasmon polaritons,” Opt. Lett. 35, 541–543 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This solution is also effective to enhance the switching performance of plasmonic couplers. In order to measure performance we consider how fast is the change from one state of the coupler to the other when input power is increased. Ideally one would desire a fast change but it was shown that power losses in the metals completely spoil the sharpness of the change [16

J. R. Salgueiro and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 081106 (2010). [CrossRef]

2. Model and approach

We consider a coupler formed by two close tapered waveguides with a dielectric core showing the Kerr nonlinearity and surrounded by metallic layers. In order to maintain the separation between both waveguides constant, we made both internal waveguide borders parallel to the z-axis (which will be considered the propagation direction) and lie both external borders forming an angle α so that the waveguide width decreases linearly with distance as shown in Fig. 1. Considering the TM mode described by the electric and magnetic fields E = E_xx + E_zz and H = H_yy, we can write the permittivity of the medium as follows,

ε (r) = {\begin{array}{l} ε_{m}; & for metallic claddings, \\ ε_{d} + {| E_{x} |}^{2} + {| E_{z} |}^{2}; & for nonlinear cores, \end{array}

(1)

where ε_m is a complex number with negative real part and an imaginary part which accounts for the loss in the metallic claddings and ε_d the linear permittivity of the dielectric cores. The Kerr coefficient γ does not appear in the above equation since we have rescaled the fields E and H by the factor γ⁻¹^/². Additionally we will consider spatial variables rescaled by the vacuum wavenumber k₀ = ω/c, being ω the frequency and c the speed of light in vacuum.

Fig. 1 Tapered plasmonic waveguide coupler. (a) Sketch of the coupled tapered metal-dielectric-metal slot waveguides. (b) View of the XZ-plane showing the different domains used in numerical FDTD simulations of the plasmonic coupler. Notations are: PML, perfectly marched layer; TF/SF, total field-scattered field technique.

In order to study the dynamics of this system a simple model to describe the effect of losses as well as the tapering shape was already proposed [17

, 18

A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, Yu. S. Kivshar, and D. K. Gramotnev, “Optimal tapers for compensating losses in plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Status Solidi RRL 4, 277–279 (2010). [CrossRef]

] for a single waveguide. It showed that for small tapering angles (α ∼ 1 deg.) the effect of power concentration due to the taper fully compensated the power loss in the metal claddings. This model can be in principle also applied to the present directional coupler considering mode amplitudes at each of the waveguides A_1,2(z) and writing the coupled equations:

2 i σ \frac{\partial A_{1}}{\partial z} + i (\frac{\partial σ}{\partial z} + Γ) A_{1} + N {| A_{1} |}^{2} A_{1} + K A_{2} = 0,

(2)

2 i σ \frac{\partial A_{2}}{\partial z} + i (\frac{\partial σ}{\partial z} + Γ) A_{2} + N {| A_{n} |}^{2} A_{2} + K A_{1} = 0,

(3)

where σ, Γ, N and K are parameters calculated applying a perturbation theory to the linear mode in order to describe losses and nonlinear effects, and considering an adiabatic approach to describe the effect of the width change of the waveguide with the propagation distance. In that way, σ describes power carried by the guides and so ∂_zσ accounts for the effect of the tapering shape, Γ describes de effect of losses, N the nonlinearity and K is the coupling coefficient describing the power transference between both waveguides [20

E. Marcatili, “Improved coupled-mode equations for dielectric guides,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 22, 988–993 (1986). [CrossRef]

Simulations of the coupled equations above using the beam-propagation method allow to obtain the characteristic switching curve of the nonlinear couplers and show that for increasing tapering angles the power density efficiency notably raises, revealing an effect of loss compensation. Unfortunately this model is too simple to describe the previously showed effect of slope decreasing [16

J. R. Salgueiro and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 081106 (2010). [CrossRef]

] that spoiled the performance of switching. Consequently, in order to better evaluate the effect of losses and study the performance enhancing of the tapered-waveguide coupler we finally carried out some FDTD simulations.

For the use of FDTD technique we considered a calculation domain divided in different regions according to the distribution of metals and nonlinear dielectrics [see Fig. 1(b)] and a specific model was applied at each region. Besides, the whole domain was surrounded by additional calculation cells to implement suitable perfectly-matched boundary (PML) conditions. To excite the mesh we used the total field-scattered field technique (TF/SF) to generate a plane wave whose amplitude was modulated with the shape of a single waveguide mode, at the position of the left core of the coupler.

In order to model metallic regions we used a scheme for cold plasmas based on Drude’s theory, necessary to take into account the strong dispersion of metals. The dispersion is introduced in Maxwell’s equations using a polarization current term [21

S. A. Cummer, “An analysis of new and existing FDTD methods for isotropic cold plasma and a method for improving their accuracy,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 45, 392–400 (1997). [CrossRef]

] J = ∂_t P which is introduced in the Maxwell’s equations, ∂_t D = ∇ × H − J, being D the electric displacement, and modeled by solving an additional differential equation,

\partial_{t} J + η J = ω_{p}^{2} E

, where ω_p is the plasma frequency and η is the electron collision frequency describing the power losses. Both parameters can be calculated from Drude’s model

ε (ω) = 1 - ω_{p}^{2} / (ω^{2} + i η ω)

. For our calculations we took the values Re(ε) = −8.25 and Im(ε) = 0.3 deduced from the optical constants of silver at λ ≈ 480 nm [22

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]

]. Taking ω = 1, we obtain ω_p = 3.043 and η = 0.031.

For the dielectric showing the Kerr nonlinearity we use a model based on an instantaneous response of the medium which is valid for a CW or even for non ultrashort pulses [23

R. M. Joseph and T. Allen, “Spatial soliton deflection mechanism indicated by FD-TD Maxwell’s equations modelling,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 6, 1251–1254 (1994). [CrossRef]

]. According to this, we use the relationship D = ε(|E|²)E taking the nonlinear permittivity as in Eq. (1). For the simulations we took ε_d = 2.25 (pure silica) though the nonlinear model is general for any Kerr material just rescaling back the fields by the factor γ^1/2, γ is the Kerr coefficient, after the simulation. At each time step, after obtaining the magnetic component and then the two components for the displacement vector, D_x and D_z, the calculation of the electric field components requires the solution of a nonlinear cubic equation at each point of the mesh. This is efficiently done by a single Newton step, starting from the value of the electric components at the previous time step.

3. Results and discussions

First, we consider a linear regime and search for the proper angle range leading to the compensation of loss. To this aim, we perform a set of experiments for different taper angles, measuring total power at each waveguide and also the irradiance inside each of the cores. In Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) plots of the irradiance at each core versus propagation distance are showed for non tapered waveguides and for tapers with an angle α = 1.9 deg. We deduced that for angles slightly lower than α = 2.0 degrees loss is compensated by the focusing effect of the taper waveguides. We should remark that irradiance is a more convenient parameter than power for this study as it represents the optical density inside the waveguide core, that can result enhanced by a progressive decrease of the core width. The total power, however, will always decrease as an effect of the optical loss in the metallic layers. In fact Fig. 2(c) shows how total power in the second waveguide decreases when the taper angle increases. This is due to the fact that when the waveguide core width is smaller a larger fraction of the modal field lies inside the metallic cladding and relative loss increase. Nevertheless the irradiance inside the core increases when the angle increases [Fig. 2(d)] because the power concentration inside the core partially compensates loss.

Fig. 2 Numerical experiments for a linear regime and different taper angles. (a–b) Irradiance at each of the cores of the coupler for a non-tapered coupler and for a loss compensating angle α = 1.9 deg. respectively. (c) Coupled power into the second waveguide versus propagation distance for different taper angles. (d) Irradiance at each waveguide core versus propagation distance.

Next, we studied the switching properties of this coupler. In Fig. 3 we show images representing the modulus of the field (magnetic component) simulated for nonlinear cores and different power regimes using tapered waveguides at an angle of α = 1.9 deg. The three images correspond to linear, intermediate and nonlinear regimes reached when input power is increasedly larger. Though loss still exist, the irradiance inside the core is enhanced as was shown in Fig. 2(d) and this is the reason why switching results more effective. This is clearly seen in the switching curve shown in Fig. 4 where the relative irradiance for a beat length is plotted against the input irradiance. The case for non tapered waveguides (α = 0.0) was already studied in Ref. [16

J. R. Salgueiro and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 081106 (2010). [CrossRef]

] where we showed how loss spoiled the performance of the coupler when used for power switching. In such a case, though switching is still possible, the slope of the curve was small and the peak reaches less than 20% respect to the case when loss is not considered. As the taper angle increases, the curve slope becomes sharper and reaches a larger fraction of the input irradiance, dramatically improving the efficiency of the device.

Fig. 3 Different images showing the evolution of the electromagnetic field (magnetic component) for tapered waveguides at an angle α = 1.9 deg. (a) corresponds to the linear case, (b) to an intermediate power regime and (c) corresponds to a nonlinear regime.

Fig. 4 Switching curve for different taper angles. Mean irradiance inside the excited core after a beat length normalized to the mean input irradiance vs. the mean input irradiance.

4. Conclusions

We have studied numerically linear and nonlinear propagation of surface plasmon polaritons in coupled metal-dielectric-metal slot waveguides and demonstrated that, by an appropriate choice of the tapering angle, we can compensate for the amplitude attenuation and enhance substantially the performance of nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers operating at the nanoscale for all-optical switching. We expect that plasmonic tapers can be useful to improve functionalities of other plasmonic devices as well as enhancing nonlinear effects, including plasmon parametric amplification, second-harmonic generation, and all-optical switching.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge a financial support from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (project MAT2008-06870), Xunta de Galicia (project 10PXIB265118PR), and the Australian Research Council.

References and links

1.	M. I. Brongersma and P. G. Krik, Eds. Surface Plasmon Nanophotonics (Springer, 2007), p. 268
2.	S. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2007), p. 219
3.	D. K. Gramotnev and S.I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit,” Nat. Photonics 4, 83–91 (2010). [CrossRef]
4.	N. C. Panoiu and R. M. Osgood, “Subwavelength nonlinear plasmonic nanowire,” Nano Lett. 4, 2427–2430 (2004). [CrossRef]
5.	W. Fan, S. Zhang, N. C. Panoiu, A. Abdenour, S. Krishna, R. M. Osgood, K. J. Malloy, and S. R. J. Brueck, “Second harmonic generation from a nanopatterned isotropic nonlinear material,” Nano Lett. 6, 1027–1030 (2006). [CrossRef]
6.	J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandke, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers, “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.	R. Yang, M. A. G. Abushagur, and Z. Lu, “Efficiently squeezing near infrared light into a 21 nm-by-24 nm nanospot,” Opt. Express 16, 20142–20148 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.	D. K. Gramotnev, K. C. Vernon, and D. F. P. Pile, “Directional coupler using gap plasmon waveguides,” Appl. Phys. B 93, 99–106 (2008). [CrossRef]
9.	Z. Chen, T. Holmgaard, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, A. V. Krasavin, A. V. Zayats, L. Markey, and A. Dereux, “Wavelength-selective directional coupling with dielectric-loaded plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 34, 810–812 (2009). [CrossRef]
10.	T. Holmgaard, Z. Chen, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, L. Markey, and A. Dereux, “Design and characterization of dielectric-loaded plasmonic directional couplers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27, 5521–5528 (2009). [CrossRef]
11.	A. Degiron, S. Y. Cho, T. Tyler, N. M. Jokerst, and D. R. Smith, “Directional coupling between dielectric and long-range plasmon waveguides,” New J. Phys. 11, 015002 (2009). [CrossRef]
12.	V. M. Agranovich, V. S. Babichenko, and V. Y. Chernyak, “Nonlinear surface polaritons,” Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 512–515 (1980).
13.	G. I. Stegeman, C. T. Seaton, J. Ariyasu, R. F. Wallis, and A. A. Maradudin, “Nonlinear electromagnetic waves guided by a single interface,” J. Appl. Phys. 58, 2453–2459 (1985). [CrossRef]
14.	D. Mihalache, G. I. Stegeman, C. T. Seaton, E. M. Wright, R. Zanoni, A. D. Boardman, and T. Twardowski, “Exact dispersion relations for transverse magnetic polarized guided waves at a nonlinear interface,” Opt. Lett. 12, 187–189 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.	A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic slot waveguides,” Opt. Express 16, 21209–21214 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.	J. R. Salgueiro and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 081106 (2010). [CrossRef]
17.	A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, A. A. Zharov, D. K. Gramotnev, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear nanofocusing in tapered plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 116804 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18.	A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, Yu. S. Kivshar, and D. K. Gramotnev, “Optimal tapers for compensating losses in plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Status Solidi RRL 4, 277–279 (2010). [CrossRef]
19.	S. I. Bozhevolnyi and K. V. Nerkararyan, “Adiabatic nanofocusing of channel plasmon polaritons,” Opt. Lett. 35, 541–543 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20.	E. Marcatili, “Improved coupled-mode equations for dielectric guides,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 22, 988–993 (1986). [CrossRef]
21.	S. A. Cummer, “An analysis of new and existing FDTD methods for isotropic cold plasma and a method for improving their accuracy,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 45, 392–400 (1997). [CrossRef]
22.	P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]
23.	R. M. Joseph and T. Allen, “Spatial soliton deflection mechanism indicated by FD-TD Maxwell’s equations modelling,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 6, 1251–1254 (1994). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(190.4390) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, integrated optics
(130.4815) Integrated optics : Optical switching devices

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: February 7, 2012
Revised Manuscript: March 21, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: April 2, 2012
Published: April 9, 2012

Citation
José R. Salgueiro and Yuri S. Kivshar, "Nonlinear couplers with tapered plasmonic waveguides," Opt. Express 20, 9403-9408 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-9-9403

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

M. I. Brongersma and P. G. Krik, Eds. Surface Plasmon Nanophotonics (Springer, 2007), p. 268
S. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2007), p. 219
D. K. Gramotnev and S.I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit,” Nat. Photonics4, 83–91 (2010). [CrossRef]
N. C. Panoiu and R. M. Osgood, “Subwavelength nonlinear plasmonic nanowire,” Nano Lett.4, 2427–2430 (2004). [CrossRef]
W. Fan, S. Zhang, N. C. Panoiu, A. Abdenour, S. Krishna, R. M. Osgood, K. J. Malloy, and S. R. J. Brueck, “Second harmonic generation from a nanopatterned isotropic nonlinear material,” Nano Lett.6, 1027–1030 (2006). [CrossRef]
J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandke, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers, “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
R. Yang, M. A. G. Abushagur, and Z. Lu, “Efficiently squeezing near infrared light into a 21 nm-by-24 nm nanospot,” Opt. Express16, 20142–20148 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
D. K. Gramotnev, K. C. Vernon, and D. F. P. Pile, “Directional coupler using gap plasmon waveguides,” Appl. Phys. B93, 99–106 (2008). [CrossRef]
Z. Chen, T. Holmgaard, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, A. V. Krasavin, A. V. Zayats, L. Markey, and A. Dereux, “Wavelength-selective directional coupling with dielectric-loaded plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Lett.34, 810–812 (2009). [CrossRef]
T. Holmgaard, Z. Chen, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, L. Markey, and A. Dereux, “Design and characterization of dielectric-loaded plasmonic directional couplers,” J. Lightwave Technol.27, 5521–5528 (2009). [CrossRef]
A. Degiron, S. Y. Cho, T. Tyler, N. M. Jokerst, and D. R. Smith, “Directional coupling between dielectric and long-range plasmon waveguides,” New J. Phys.11, 015002 (2009). [CrossRef]
V. M. Agranovich, V. S. Babichenko, and V. Y. Chernyak, “Nonlinear surface polaritons,” Sov. Phys. JETP32, 512–515 (1980).
G. I. Stegeman, C. T. Seaton, J. Ariyasu, R. F. Wallis, and A. A. Maradudin, “Nonlinear electromagnetic waves guided by a single interface,” J. Appl. Phys.58, 2453–2459 (1985). [CrossRef]
D. Mihalache, G. I. Stegeman, C. T. Seaton, E. M. Wright, R. Zanoni, A. D. Boardman, and T. Twardowski, “Exact dispersion relations for transverse magnetic polarized guided waves at a nonlinear interface,” Opt. Lett.12, 187–189 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic slot waveguides,” Opt. Express16, 21209–21214 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. R. Salgueiro and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear plasmonic directional couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett.97, 081106 (2010). [CrossRef]
A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, A. A. Zharov, D. K. Gramotnev, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear nanofocusing in tapered plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 116804 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. R. Davoyan, I. V. Shadrivov, Yu. S. Kivshar, and D. K. Gramotnev, “Optimal tapers for compensating losses in plasmonic waveguides,” Phys. Status Solidi RRL4, 277–279 (2010). [CrossRef]
S. I. Bozhevolnyi and K. V. Nerkararyan, “Adiabatic nanofocusing of channel plasmon polaritons,” Opt. Lett.35, 541–543 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
E. Marcatili, “Improved coupled-mode equations for dielectric guides,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.22, 988–993 (1986). [CrossRef]
S. A. Cummer, “An analysis of new and existing FDTD methods for isotropic cold plasma and a method for improving their accuracy,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.45, 392–400 (1997). [CrossRef]
P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B6, 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]
R. M. Joseph and T. Allen, “Spatial soliton deflection mechanism indicated by FD-TD Maxwell’s equations modelling,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.6, 1251–1254 (1994). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper