OSA's Digital Library

Energy Express

Energy Express

  • Editor: Christian Seassal
  • Vol. 20, Iss. S6 — Nov. 5, 2012
  • pp: A916–A923
« Show journal navigation

Enhanced power generation in concentrated photovoltaics using broadband antireflective coverglasses with moth eye structures

Young Min Song, Yonkil Jeong, Chan Il Yeo, and Yong Tak Lee  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue S6, pp. A916-A923 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.00A916


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1287 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present the effect of broadband antireflective coverglasses (BARCs) with moth eye structures on the power generation capability of a sub-receiver module for concentrated photovoltaics. The period and height of the moth eye structures were designed by a rigorous coupled-wave analysis method in order to cover the full solar spectral ranges without transmission band shrinkage. The BARCs with moth eye structures were prepared by the dry etching of silver (Ag) nanomasks, and the fabricated moth eye structures on coverglass showed strongly enhanced transmittance compared to the bare glass with a flat surface, at wavelengths of 300 - 1800 nm. The BARCs were mounted on InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells and the power conversion efficiency of this sub-receiver module reached 42.16% for 196 suns, which is a 7.41% boosted value compared to that of a module with bare coverglass, without any detrimental changes of the open circuit voltages (Voc) and fill factor (FF).

© 2012 OSA

1. Introduction

Concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) systems with III-V based multi-junction solar cells have been considered a promising form of solar power generation due to their high power conversion efficiency per unit area [1

1. R. M. Swanson, “The promise of Concentrators,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 8(1), 93–111 (2000). [CrossRef]

3

3. D. Friedman, “Progress and challenges for next-generation high-efficiency multijunction solar cells,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 14(6), 131–138 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. Other attractive features, such as higher photon absorption by the direct bandgap energies, strong durability against high temperature, and a variety of material selection, also make III-V solar cells very competitive for the space and terrestrial market [4

4. M. Yamaguchi, “III-V compound multi-junction solar cells: present and future,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 75(1-2), 261–269 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. A key challenge for CPV technology is light management, which is implemented both by tuning the materials' bandgap and by reducing light reflection at each interface, in a broad solar spectral range. By stacking absorbing materials of different bandgaps (i.e., GaInP/(In)GaAs/Ge cells), III-V multi-junction solar cells currently can absorb light from 300 nm to 1800 nm [5

5. W. Guter, J. Schone, S. P. Philipps, M. Steiner, G. Siefer, A. Wekkeli, E. Welser, E. Oliva, A. W. Bett, and F. Dimroth, “Current-matched triple-junction solar cell reaching 41.1% conversion efficiency under concentrated sunlight,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(22), 223504 (2009). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. S. P. Philipps, G. Peharz, R. Hoheisel, T. Hornung, N. M. Al-Abbadi, F. Dimroth, and A. W. Bett, “Energy harvesting efficiency of III-V triple-junction concentrator solar cells under realistic spectral conditions,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94(5), 869–877 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. Standard single or double layer antireflection (AR) coatings are clearly unsuitable for this type of solar cell due to the limited spectral and angular bandwidth; hence, broadband antireflection layers are necessary in order to improve the power conversion efficiency. In particular, for CPV systems, these AR layers should be designed to minimize reflection at the sub-receiver module level, which contains coverglasses and encapsulants.

Broadband and omni-directional AR characteristics can be realized in this manner by using multi-layered thin film coatings of materials with a gradually varying refractive index [7

7. W. H. Southwell, “Gradient-index antireflection coatings,” Opt. Lett. 8(11), 584–586 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10

10. S. J. Jang, Y. M. Song, C. I. Yeo, C. Y. Park, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Antireflective property of thin film a-Si solar cell structures with graded refractive index structure,” Opt. Express 19(S2Suppl 2), A108–A117 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], or through nano-patterning with a tapered profile, creating the so called moth eye structure [11

11. S. Chattopadhyay, Y.-F. Huang, Y.-J. Jen, A. Ganguly, K.-H. Chen, and L.-C. Chen, “Anti-reflecting and photonic nanostructures,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 69(1-3), 1–35 (2010). [CrossRef]

17

17. P. Yu, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Chiu, C.-S. Yang, J.-C. Yu, H.-C. Kuo, S.-H. Hsu, and Y.-C. Chang, “Efficiency enhancement of GaAs photovoltaics employing antireflective indium tin oxide nanocolums,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(16), 1618–1621 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Many approaches to produce nanostructures with this moth eye effect were successfully developed on various organic/inorganic materials [11

11. S. Chattopadhyay, Y.-F. Huang, Y.-J. Jen, A. Ganguly, K.-H. Chen, and L.-C. Chen, “Anti-reflecting and photonic nanostructures,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 69(1-3), 1–35 (2010). [CrossRef]

, 12

12. R. Brunner, O. Sandfuchs, C. Pacholski, C. Morhard, and J. Spatz, “Lessons from nature: biomimetic subwavelength structures for high-performance optics,” Laser Photon. Rev. 5, 1–19 (2011).

], and some of those structures were applied on the surface of solar cells to minimize reflection over the broad wavelength range [16

16. H. Sai, H. Fujii, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, Y. Kanamori, H. Yugami, and M. Yamaguchi, “Wide-Angle Antireflection Effect of Subwavelength Structures for Solar Cells,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(6A), 3333–3336 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 17

17. P. Yu, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Chiu, C.-S. Yang, J.-C. Yu, H.-C. Kuo, S.-H. Hsu, and Y.-C. Chang, “Efficiency enhancement of GaAs photovoltaics employing antireflective indium tin oxide nanocolums,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(16), 1618–1621 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. However, structures directly integrated on the cell surface could lead to severe surface recombination [16

16. H. Sai, H. Fujii, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, Y. Kanamori, H. Yugami, and M. Yamaguchi, “Wide-Angle Antireflection Effect of Subwavelength Structures for Solar Cells,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(6A), 3333–3336 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 18

18. K. Peng, Y. Xu, Y. Wu, Y. Yan, S. T. Lee, and J. Zhu, “Aligned single-crystalline Si nanowire arrays for photovoltaic applications,” Small 1(11), 1062–1067 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 19

19. E. C. Garnett and P. Yang, “Silicon nanowire radial p-n junction solar cells,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(29), 9224–9225 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], which degrades the cell performance, or require complex and time consuming fabrication schemes.

Herein, we present an approach to improve the power conversion efficiency of III-V based CPV systems by using broadband antireflective coverglasses (BARCs) with moth eye structures. The use of BARCs provides i) enhanced external quantum efficiency, due strongly to the reduced reflection; ii) a way of integrating the moth eye structures without changing any fabrication procedure at the device level; and iii) no electrical characteristic degradation because of the electrically separated schemes of the moth eye structures from the solar cells. The moth eye structure was fabricated on the coverglasses by using thermally dewetted Ag nanoparticles (NPs) [14

14. Y. M. Song, E. S. Choi, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Light-extraction enhancement of red AlGaInP light-emitting diodes with antireflective subwavelength structures,” Opt. Express 17(23), 20991–20997 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 20

20. Y. Kojima and T. Kato, “Nanoparticle formation in Au thin films by electron-beam-induced dewetting,” Nanotechnology 19(25), 255605 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The design rules for the moth eye structure were optimized to have AR properties over the entire solar spectral range (300 nm to 1800 nm) through optical modeling by a rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) method. The AR properties of BARCs were characterized by transmittance spectra measurement and confirmed by cell efficiency measurement of the CPV sub-receiver modules, with BARCs both at one sun and high concentration conditions.

2. Experimental details

Figure 1(a)
Fig. 1 (a) Schematic diagram of CPV sub-receiver module with BARCs. The right figure shows the fabrication steps for BARCs with moth eye surfaces, (b) Refractive index profiles of CPV sub-receiver module as a function of height for three different cases: without bare coverglass (BC), with BC, and with BARC. Refractive indices of each material at ~600 nm were considered.
illustrates the basic structure of the III-V based CPV sub-receiver module with BARCs. InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells (active area = 0.3025 cm2) with TiO2/Al2O3 double layer AR coatings were used in this experiment. The solar cells are mounted on an alumina substrate with gold-plated thick copper electrode. Then, the cells were encapsulated by a silicone resin and the BARCs were attached on the top of the resin by subsequent hardening with thermal treatment. The steps of BARCs fabrication are depicted in the right image of Fig. 1(a). First, Ag thin films with 10, 20 and 30 nm thickness were deposited on the coverglass substrates (BoroFloat33, Schott) through e-beam evaporation with a deposition rate of 1.0Å/s. To form Ag NPs, the samples were heated in a rapid thermal annealing (RTA) system at 500 °C for 1 min in a nitrogen environment. To fabricate moth eye structures, an overall dry etch process was carried out in an inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etch (ICP-RIE) system with a CF4/O2 (40 sccm/10 sccm) gas mixture at room temperature. The process pressure and RF power were kept at 50 mTorr and 150 W, respectively. The residual Ag NPs were removed by immersion in a wet etchant (KI: I2: H2O = 1: 1: 40) that does not affect the shape of the moth eye structure. The surface morphology of the fabricated BARCs was characterized by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4700). The transmittance spectra of each sample were evaluated using an UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (Cary 500, Varian) in the wavelength range of 300 - 2400 nm.

For comparison, three different types of sub-receiver module (i. e., without bare coverglass (BC), with BC, and with BARC) were prepared. As described in Fig. 1(b), in a sub-receiver module without BC (black dashed line), the refractive index changes abruptly from ~2.98 (AlInP, outermost layer of triple-junction solar cells) to 1.0 (air) via only two step grading. The silicone resin (nresin~1.53) and the coverglass (nglass~1.50) slightly relax this abrupt index change (blue dashed line), but an index discontinuity still exists between glass and air. In contrast, the use of the moth eye surface (red solid line) makes an almost linearly graded effective refractive index profile at the interface between the glass and air, which provides efficient light transmission. The current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of these three different modules were measured by using a solar simulator (WACOM, WXS-450S-65, AM 1.5 G) with various light concentration ratios at room temperature. An optical rod was used as a secondary optic concentrator to focus the light within the designated cell area under the highly concentrated solar irradiation.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Design and fabrication of BARCs

A sub-200 nm pattern with an aspect ratio of >2 is difficult to obtain through conventional nanolithography, due to the low etch selectivity of glass over e-beam resist or photoresist as well as time consuming fabrication schemes. In contrast, metal NPs act as nano-scale hard masks, and these enable high aspect ratio nano features. Figure 3(a)
Fig. 3 (a) SEM images (45°-tilted angle view) of (i-iii) thermally dewetted Ag NPs on coverglass substrates and (iv-vi) moth eye structures fabricated with an overall dry etch process for 7 min. Initial Ag film thicknesses correspond to (i, iv) 10 nm, (ii, v) 20 nm, and (iii, vi) 30 nm, respectively. Scale bar: 1 μm. (b) Measured transmittance of a bare glass (black solid line) and moth eye structure integrated glasses with Ag film thickness of 10, 20, and 30 nm, respectively. A black dotted line corresponds to the maximum transmittance spectra of glass with zero-reflectance at single-side.
shows the SEM images of thermally dewetted Ag NPs on coverglass substrates with thicknesses of (i) 10 nm, (ii) 20 nm, and (iii) 30 nm, respectively. The average size of the Ag NPs and the distance of each NP increased as the deposited film thickness increased and these features transferred to the fabricated moth eye structure. After the overall dry etch process of the Ag NPs and the removal of Ag residues, disordered and tapered nanoscale patterns were generated on the coverglass surface. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the pattern height for the moth eye structure with 10 nm thick Ag films was ~500 nm and taller heights are observed in the structure with thicker Ag films. This can be explained by the fact that the packing density affects the etch rate. Figure 3(b) shows the measured transmittance spectra of the base glass and moth eye glasses with different Ag film thicknesses in the wavelengths of 300 - 2400 nm. If the glass has flat surface on both sides, the reflection values are the same for air/glass interface and glass/air interface. In this case, (100-Tbare) / 2 means the reflection at single side. Therefore, if the reflection is 0 at one side, the total transmittance can be defined as 100-(100-Tbare)/2. This maximum transmittance for the glass with zero-reflection at single side is also presented in Fig. 3(b). As expected, transmittance drops exist at the short wavelength ranges for the moth eye structures with 20 and 30 nm Ag films, while the transmittance curve was sustained over the full solar spectral range for those with 10 nm Ag film. These drops are attributed to the large distance between the tapered structures, which generates higher order diffraction. Since the disordered structures consist of multiple spatial wavelength components to the pattern, the curves do not change rapidly, a result that is different than the expected ones in the calculation. In the case of Ag 10 nm, as the wavelength increases, the transmittance decays faster than that of 20 and 30 nm because of their relatively smaller height. Nevertheless, the moth eye structure fabricated with Ag 10 nm on the coverglass is enough to use as BARCs over the range of interest (300 - 1800 nm). The averaged value of transmittance for the case of 10 nm Ag film is 95.7% in the range of 300 - 1800 nm, which is quite similar with the ideal value (Tmax_ave = 96.5%).

3.2. III-V based sub-receiver module with BARCs

To verify the effect of BARCs on the cell performance, the BARCs with an Ag film thickness of 10 nm were mounted on InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells with silicone resin. Figure 4(a)
Fig. 4 (a) Measured reflectance results of GaInP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells without BC (black line), with BC (blue line), with BARC (red line). AM 1.5G solar spectrum is also shown as a reference. (b) J-V characteristics of sub-receiver modules with three different types under AM 1.5G 1-sun. Inset shows the Jsc of modules of three types.
shows the measured reflectance spectra of the cells with three different types (i. e., without BC, with BC, with BARC). In all cases, the reflectance spectra show ripple patterns in the wavelength range above ~900 nm due to the interference of light reflected at the different interfacial layers inside the cell structure, which is analogous to a Fabry-Perot resonance. These fringing on the reflectivity of triple-junction solar cells has similar tendency with the calculation results in other literature [9

9. M. F. Schubert, F. W. Mont, S. Chhajed, D. J. Poxson, J. K. Kim, and E. F. Schubert, “Design of multilayer antireflection coatings made from co-sputtered and low-refractive-index materials by genetic algorithm,” Opt. Express 16(8), 5290–5298 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. By applying the BC, the reflectance was slightly lowered to the level without BC, owing mainly to the relaxed refractive index gap between air and the cells. As shown in Fig. 4(a), it is clear that the BARC have the lowest reflectance over the whole solar spectral range compared to that of other cases. It is valuable to calculate the solar weight reflectance (SWR), which is determined by the ratio of the reflected photons to total incident photons [22

22. H. Sai, Y. Kanamori, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, and M. Yamaguchi, “Light trapping effect of submicron surface textures in crystalline Si solar cells,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 15(5), 415–423 (2007). [CrossRef]

], to optimize the AR structure. The SWR of BARC for the wavelength of 300 - 1800 nm is 2.11%, which is 3.20% and 4.58% lower than that of the cells with and without the BC, respectively. This reflectance suppression contributes to the enhanced current density of the fabricated sub-receiver module. Figure 4(b) represents the measured current J-V curves for three different types of sub-receiver modules under one-sun of Air Mass (AM) 1.5G. The obtained device characteristics are summarized in Table 1

Table 1. Device characteristics of the sub-receiver modules for three different types

table-icon
View This Table
. The values in the brackets represent the data before BC and BARC structures are applied. The sub-receiver module without BC had a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 14.88 mA/cm2, and this value was enhanced 3.29% by adding the BC. The use of BARC instead of BC brings an additionally improved Jsc of 4.99% compared to that of the BC due to the efficient light management, while the open circuit voltage (Voc) and the fill factor were kept at similar values.

Under the light concentration, the cell efficiency increased due to the increased Voc and fill factor. Figure 5
Fig. 5 Power conversion efficiency and current density of CPV sub-receiver modules with three different types as a function of light concentration ratio.
illustrates the power conversion efficiency and Jsc of the CPV sub-receiver modules versus the light concentration ratio. A strong increase in power conversion efficiency was shown in all three curves, and these have a roll-over point at around 200 - 300 suns, which results from the decreased fill factor by the increased series resistance of the cells [23

23. J. Nelson, The Physics of Solar Cells (Imperical College Press, 2003).

]. The modules with BC and BARC exhibit the improved power conversion performance in comparison to the modules uncovered by glass and resin, which is mainly caused by the increased Jsc. The tendency of the enhanced efficiency was sustained at high concentration ratio, and the maximum efficiency of the sub-receiver module with BARC was achieved at 42.16% for 196 suns, which is a 7.41% boosted value, relative to the use of conventional coverglasses.

4. Conclusion

To improve the power conversion efficiency of a III-V based CPV sub-receiver module, the moth eye structures were fabricated on a coverglass substrate using thermally dewetted Ag NPs, and their optical characteristics were investigated in terms of wavelength, together with a theoretical calculation using the RCWA method. The fabricated moth eye structures on the coverglass substrate showed very high transmittance compared to the sample with a flat surface over the full solar spectral range (300 - 1800 nm). Also, the fabricated CPV sub-receiver module with BARCs showed an increased Jsc both in one sun and high concentration mode, without any detrimental changes. From these results, we expect that the use of BARCs may provide a promising potential for various photovoltaic devices.

Acknowledgment

References and links

1.

R. M. Swanson, “The promise of Concentrators,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 8(1), 93–111 (2000). [CrossRef]

2.

G. Zubi, J. L. Bernal-Agustin, and G. V. Fracastoro, “High concentration photovoltaic systems applying III-V cell,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13(9), 2645–2652 (2009). [CrossRef]

3.

D. Friedman, “Progress and challenges for next-generation high-efficiency multijunction solar cells,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 14(6), 131–138 (2010). [CrossRef]

4.

M. Yamaguchi, “III-V compound multi-junction solar cells: present and future,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 75(1-2), 261–269 (2003). [CrossRef]

5.

W. Guter, J. Schone, S. P. Philipps, M. Steiner, G. Siefer, A. Wekkeli, E. Welser, E. Oliva, A. W. Bett, and F. Dimroth, “Current-matched triple-junction solar cell reaching 41.1% conversion efficiency under concentrated sunlight,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(22), 223504 (2009). [CrossRef]

6.

S. P. Philipps, G. Peharz, R. Hoheisel, T. Hornung, N. M. Al-Abbadi, F. Dimroth, and A. W. Bett, “Energy harvesting efficiency of III-V triple-junction concentrator solar cells under realistic spectral conditions,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94(5), 869–877 (2010). [CrossRef]

7.

W. H. Southwell, “Gradient-index antireflection coatings,” Opt. Lett. 8(11), 584–586 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

J.-Q. Xi, M. F. Schubert, J. K. Kim, E. F. Schubert, M. Chen, S.-Y. Lin, W. Liu, and J. A. Smart, “Optical thin-film materials with low refractive index for broadband elimination of Fresnel reflection,” Nat. Photonics 1, 176–179 (2007).

9.

M. F. Schubert, F. W. Mont, S. Chhajed, D. J. Poxson, J. K. Kim, and E. F. Schubert, “Design of multilayer antireflection coatings made from co-sputtered and low-refractive-index materials by genetic algorithm,” Opt. Express 16(8), 5290–5298 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

S. J. Jang, Y. M. Song, C. I. Yeo, C. Y. Park, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Antireflective property of thin film a-Si solar cell structures with graded refractive index structure,” Opt. Express 19(S2Suppl 2), A108–A117 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

S. Chattopadhyay, Y.-F. Huang, Y.-J. Jen, A. Ganguly, K.-H. Chen, and L.-C. Chen, “Anti-reflecting and photonic nanostructures,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 69(1-3), 1–35 (2010). [CrossRef]

12.

R. Brunner, O. Sandfuchs, C. Pacholski, C. Morhard, and J. Spatz, “Lessons from nature: biomimetic subwavelength structures for high-performance optics,” Laser Photon. Rev. 5, 1–19 (2011).

13.

Y.-F. Huang, S. Chattopadhyay, Y.-J. Jen, C.-Y. Peng, T.-A. Liu, Y.-K. Hsu, C.-L. Pan, H.-C. Lo, C. H. Hsu, Y. H. Chang, C.-S. Lee, K.-H. Chen, and L.-C. Chen, “Improved broadband and quasi-omnidirectional anti-reflection properties with biomimetic silicon nanostructures,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 2(12), 770–774 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

Y. M. Song, E. S. Choi, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Light-extraction enhancement of red AlGaInP light-emitting diodes with antireflective subwavelength structures,” Opt. Express 17(23), 20991–20997 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

Y. M. Song, S. J. Jang, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Bioinspired parabola-shaped subwavelength structures for improved broadband antireflection,” Small 6(9), 984–987 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

H. Sai, H. Fujii, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, Y. Kanamori, H. Yugami, and M. Yamaguchi, “Wide-Angle Antireflection Effect of Subwavelength Structures for Solar Cells,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(6A), 3333–3336 (2007). [CrossRef]

17.

P. Yu, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Chiu, C.-S. Yang, J.-C. Yu, H.-C. Kuo, S.-H. Hsu, and Y.-C. Chang, “Efficiency enhancement of GaAs photovoltaics employing antireflective indium tin oxide nanocolums,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.) 21(16), 1618–1621 (2009). [CrossRef]

18.

K. Peng, Y. Xu, Y. Wu, Y. Yan, S. T. Lee, and J. Zhu, “Aligned single-crystalline Si nanowire arrays for photovoltaic applications,” Small 1(11), 1062–1067 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

E. C. Garnett and P. Yang, “Silicon nanowire radial p-n junction solar cells,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(29), 9224–9225 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

Y. Kojima and T. Kato, “Nanoparticle formation in Au thin films by electron-beam-induced dewetting,” Nanotechnology 19(25), 255605 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21.

Y. M. Song, H. J. Choi, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Design of highly transparent glasses with broadband antireflective subwavelength structures,” Opt. Express 18(12), 13063–13071 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

H. Sai, Y. Kanamori, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, and M. Yamaguchi, “Light trapping effect of submicron surface textures in crystalline Si solar cells,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 15(5), 415–423 (2007). [CrossRef]

23.

J. Nelson, The Physics of Solar Cells (Imperical College Press, 2003).

OCIS Codes
(040.5350) Detectors : Photovoltaic
(220.4241) Optical design and fabrication : Nanostructure fabrication
(050.6624) Diffraction and gratings : Subwavelength structures
(310.6805) Thin films : Theory and design

ToC Category:
Photovoltaics

History
Original Manuscript: July 13, 2012
Revised Manuscript: September 15, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 7, 2012
Published: October 15, 2012

Citation
Young Min Song, Yonkil Jeong, Chan Il Yeo, and Yong Tak Lee, "Enhanced power generation in concentrated photovoltaics using broadband antireflective coverglasses with moth eye structures," Opt. Express 20, A916-A923 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-S6-A916


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. M. Swanson, “The promise of Concentrators,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.8(1), 93–111 (2000). [CrossRef]
  2. G. Zubi, J. L. Bernal-Agustin, and G. V. Fracastoro, “High concentration photovoltaic systems applying III-V cell,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.13(9), 2645–2652 (2009). [CrossRef]
  3. D. Friedman, “Progress and challenges for next-generation high-efficiency multijunction solar cells,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.14(6), 131–138 (2010). [CrossRef]
  4. M. Yamaguchi, “III-V compound multi-junction solar cells: present and future,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells75(1-2), 261–269 (2003). [CrossRef]
  5. W. Guter, J. Schone, S. P. Philipps, M. Steiner, G. Siefer, A. Wekkeli, E. Welser, E. Oliva, A. W. Bett, and F. Dimroth, “Current-matched triple-junction solar cell reaching 41.1% conversion efficiency under concentrated sunlight,” Appl. Phys. Lett.94(22), 223504 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. S. P. Philipps, G. Peharz, R. Hoheisel, T. Hornung, N. M. Al-Abbadi, F. Dimroth, and A. W. Bett, “Energy harvesting efficiency of III-V triple-junction concentrator solar cells under realistic spectral conditions,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells94(5), 869–877 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. W. H. Southwell, “Gradient-index antireflection coatings,” Opt. Lett.8(11), 584–586 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J.-Q. Xi, M. F. Schubert, J. K. Kim, E. F. Schubert, M. Chen, S.-Y. Lin, W. Liu, and J. A. Smart, “Optical thin-film materials with low refractive index for broadband elimination of Fresnel reflection,” Nat. Photonics1, 176–179 (2007).
  9. M. F. Schubert, F. W. Mont, S. Chhajed, D. J. Poxson, J. K. Kim, and E. F. Schubert, “Design of multilayer antireflection coatings made from co-sputtered and low-refractive-index materials by genetic algorithm,” Opt. Express16(8), 5290–5298 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. S. J. Jang, Y. M. Song, C. I. Yeo, C. Y. Park, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Antireflective property of thin film a-Si solar cell structures with graded refractive index structure,” Opt. Express19(S2Suppl 2), A108–A117 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. S. Chattopadhyay, Y.-F. Huang, Y.-J. Jen, A. Ganguly, K.-H. Chen, and L.-C. Chen, “Anti-reflecting and photonic nanostructures,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep.69(1-3), 1–35 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. R. Brunner, O. Sandfuchs, C. Pacholski, C. Morhard, and J. Spatz, “Lessons from nature: biomimetic subwavelength structures for high-performance optics,” Laser Photon. Rev.5, 1–19 (2011).
  13. Y.-F. Huang, S. Chattopadhyay, Y.-J. Jen, C.-Y. Peng, T.-A. Liu, Y.-K. Hsu, C.-L. Pan, H.-C. Lo, C. H. Hsu, Y. H. Chang, C.-S. Lee, K.-H. Chen, and L.-C. Chen, “Improved broadband and quasi-omnidirectional anti-reflection properties with biomimetic silicon nanostructures,” Nat. Nanotechnol.2(12), 770–774 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Y. M. Song, E. S. Choi, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Light-extraction enhancement of red AlGaInP light-emitting diodes with antireflective subwavelength structures,” Opt. Express17(23), 20991–20997 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Y. M. Song, S. J. Jang, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Bioinspired parabola-shaped subwavelength structures for improved broadband antireflection,” Small6(9), 984–987 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. H. Sai, H. Fujii, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, Y. Kanamori, H. Yugami, and M. Yamaguchi, “Wide-Angle Antireflection Effect of Subwavelength Structures for Solar Cells,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.46(6A), 3333–3336 (2007). [CrossRef]
  17. P. Yu, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Chiu, C.-S. Yang, J.-C. Yu, H.-C. Kuo, S.-H. Hsu, and Y.-C. Chang, “Efficiency enhancement of GaAs photovoltaics employing antireflective indium tin oxide nanocolums,” Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla.)21(16), 1618–1621 (2009). [CrossRef]
  18. K. Peng, Y. Xu, Y. Wu, Y. Yan, S. T. Lee, and J. Zhu, “Aligned single-crystalline Si nanowire arrays for photovoltaic applications,” Small1(11), 1062–1067 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. E. C. Garnett and P. Yang, “Silicon nanowire radial p-n junction solar cells,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.130(29), 9224–9225 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Y. Kojima and T. Kato, “Nanoparticle formation in Au thin films by electron-beam-induced dewetting,” Nanotechnology19(25), 255605 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Y. M. Song, H. J. Choi, J. S. Yu, and Y. T. Lee, “Design of highly transparent glasses with broadband antireflective subwavelength structures,” Opt. Express18(12), 13063–13071 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. H. Sai, Y. Kanamori, K. Arafune, Y. Ohshita, and M. Yamaguchi, “Light trapping effect of submicron surface textures in crystalline Si solar cells,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.15(5), 415–423 (2007). [CrossRef]
  23. J. Nelson, The Physics of Solar Cells (Imperical College Press, 2003).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited