OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 10 — May. 20, 2013
  • pp: 12122–12128
« Show journal navigation

Lasing through a strongly-coupled mode by intra-cavity pumping

Gleb M. Akselrod, Elizabeth R. Young, M. Scott Bradley, and Vladimir Bulović  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 10, pp. 12122-12128 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.012122


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2498 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We demonstrate room temperature lasing through the polaritonic mode of a J-aggregate microcavity in which losses from exciton-exciton annihilation and slow polariton relaxation typical of direct J-aggregate excitation are circumvented via intra-cavity pumping. The pumping scheme utilizes an organic dye layer (DCM) within the cavity with an emission band overlapping the entire lower J-aggregate polariton branch spectrum, hence forcing DCM lasing to occur through the strongly-coupled mode. This cavity architecture, which separates strong coupling and gain into two materials, presents a general and flexible design for polariton devices and allows for the use of a wide range of materials, organic and inorganic, to be integrated into the cavity.

© 2013 OSA

The traditional non-resonant pumping scheme for populating the LP branch involves off-normal-angle excitation of the polariton microcavity with incident light of photon energy well above the LP energy [Fig. 1(a)] [16

16. J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, R. André, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and S. Dang, “Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons,” Nature 443(7110), 409–414 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The photogenerated hot excitons then relax to the exciton reservoir and subsequently relax to the bottom of the LP branch by polariton-polariton scattering or phonon-polariton scattering. In contrast, in the intra-cavity pumping scheme [Fig. 1(b)], described in this work, a second, emissive material inside the cavity acts as the LP pump [15

15. M. Bradley and V. Bulović, “Intracavity optical pumping of J-aggregate microcavity exciton polaritons,” Phys. Rev. B 82(3), 033305 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. The broadband emission spectrum of the pump material is chosen to overlap with the entire dispersion of the LP branch. Therefore, any cavity emission from the pump material, either spontaneous or stimulated, occurs through the strongly-coupled LP mode. By utilizing this intra-cavity pump scheme, scattering from the exciton reservoir can be avoided, hence reducing the amount of exciton-exciton annihilation. Furthermore, if the intra-cavity pump material has a large stimulated emission cross-section, lasing of the pump material will occur through the strongly coupled mode, thus not requiring LP-LP scattering to create lasing from a polaritonic cavity. In particular, the four-level structure of organic materials is responsible for low (~10 μJ/cm2) lasing thresholds [17

17. I. D. W. Samuel and G. A. Turnbull, “Organic semiconductor lasers,” Chem. Rev. 107(4), 1272–1295 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] [18

18. M. Koschorreck, R. Gehlhaar, V. G. Lyssenko, M. Swoboda, M. Hoffmann, and K. Leo, “Dynamics of a high-Q vertical-cavity organic laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(18), 181108 (2005). [CrossRef]

], which suggests that similarly low thresholds should be possible from a cavity in strong coupling. Lasing through the strongly coupled mode has been suggested to explain the room temperature polariton lasing in anthracene [19

19. G. C. La Rocca, “Organic photonics: polariton lasing,” Nat. Photonics 4(6), 343–345 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. Regardless of the mechanism of amplification—LP-LP scattering or stimulated emission—the result is coherent emission through a strongly-coupled mode with a single nonlinear threshold. In the case of organic microcavities, the use of two optically active materials creates a cavity architecture that relaxes the stringent material requirements to achieve organic lasing in a strongly coupled mode by employing one strongly coupled material to create the polariton mode and another material to populate the LP branch and creating lasing.

In this work, the strongly coupled material is a highly optically absorbing 5-nm thick J-aggregate thin film with an absorption line centered at energy E = 2.100 eV (corresponding to the wavelength λ = 591 nm), with a linewidth of 87 meV, and a peak absorption coefficient of 4 × 105 cm−1. The intra-cavity pump material is the laser dye DCM (4-(dicyanomethylene)-2-methyl-6-(4-dimethylaminostyryl)-4H-pyran), with broadband emission centered at E = 2.03 eV (λ = 612 nm), which overlaps well with the entire LP branch [Fig. 2(b)
Fig. 2 (a) Schematic of the cavity structure along with an approximate representation of the cavity electric field with the TDBC J-aggregate film at one of the cavity antinodes. (b) Absorption spectrum of TDBC J-aggregates and the emission spectrum of DCM showing overlap with the LP energy. The DCM:Alq3 absorption is negligible at the LP energy. (c) PL of the LP branch as a function of angle for three cavity-exciton detunings, showing a fit to the LP dispersion, demonstrating that the cavity is in strong coupling.
]. The absorption of DCM is negligible at the LP energy [Fig. 2(b)]. The cavity is fabricated on a quartz substrate by first depositing a 7.5 bilayer SiO2/TiO2 distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) by RF magnetron sputtering. A λ0/4 SiO2 spacer layer is deposited on the DBR (where λ0 = 605 nm is the average position of the lower polariton branch across the sample) in order to position the subsequently deposited J-aggregate layer at the anti-node of the cavity electric field. The J-aggregate thin film is grown by sequential immersion of the sample into solutions containing the anionic cyanine dye TDBC (5,6-dichloro-2- [3-[5,6-dichloro-1-ethyl-3-(3-sulfopropyl)-2(3H)- benzimidazolidene]-1-propenyl]-1-ethyl-3-(3-sulfopropyl) benzimidazolium hydroxide)) and the cationic polyelectrolyte PDAC (poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)) [20

20. M. S. Bradley, J. R. Tischler, and V. Bulovic, “Layer-by-layer J-aggregate thin films with a peak absorption constant of 10(6) cm(−1),” Adv. Mater. 17(15), 1881–1886 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. The remainder of the λ-thick cavity is filled with DCM doped at 2.5% w/w in Alq3 (aluminum tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)) [21

21. V. Kozlov, V. Bulovic, P. E. Burrows, M. Baldo, V. B. Khalfin, G. Parthasarathy, S. R. Forrest, Y. You, and M. E. Thompson, “Study of lasing action based on Förster energy transfer in optically pumped organic semiconductor thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 84(8), 4096–4108 (1998). [CrossRef]

] deposited by thermal co-evaporation. In addition, a 15 nm spacer layer of Alq3 containing no DCM is deposited on the J-aggregate film to avoid Förster resonant energy transfer (FRET) between the TDBC and the DCM. The top mirror is a thermally evaporated film of Ag with a thickness of 300 nm. The 30 nm effective optical path length at the Ag mirror due to phase shift upon reflection is taken into account in the cavity design. The Alq3:DCM layer is grown with a spatial gradient to achieve a variable cavity thickness, and hence cavity-exciton detuning, across the sample, with a detuning of 0 meV at the center of the sample. The complete microcavity structure is shown in Fig. 2(a).

The cavity is excited with near transform-limited λ = 400 nm, 100 fs pulses with a repetition rate of 1 kHz focused through a 0.7 NA microscope objective to a spot size of 20 μm in diameter. The excitation is linearly polarized. The λ = 400 nm excitation creates Alq3 excitons which undergo an efficient Förster-resonant-energy-transfer (FRET) to the DCM molecules [21

21. V. Kozlov, V. Bulovic, P. E. Burrows, M. Baldo, V. B. Khalfin, G. Parthasarathy, S. R. Forrest, Y. You, and M. E. Thompson, “Study of lasing action based on Förster energy transfer in optically pumped organic semiconductor thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 84(8), 4096–4108 (1998). [CrossRef]

]. Photoluminescence (PL) is collected from the sample through the same objective with the Fourier plane of the objective imaged onto a fiber coupled to a spectrograph. The fiber is scanned across the momentum space image to obtain the PL dispersion of the cavity with 0.5° angular resolution. Alternatively, an imaging CCD is positioned at the same image plane to obtain the momentum space image [22

22. C. W. Lai, N. Y. Kim, S. Utsunomiya, G. Roumpos, H. Deng, M. D. Fraser, T. Byrnes, P. Recher, N. Kumada, T. Fujisawa, and Y. Yamamoto, “Coherent zero-state and pi-state in an exciton-polariton condensate array.,” Nature 450(7169), 529–532 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. All experiments are performed at room temperature in ambient atmosphere. Angle-resolved PL is shown in Fig. 2(c) for three cavity-exciton detunings (Δ = 10, −50, −90 meV) corresponding to three points on the surface of the sample. A fit of the dispersion to the polariton two-level model results in a Rabi splitting of 60 ± 5 meV and demonstrates that the cavity is in strong coupling.

Figure 3(a)
Fig. 3 (a) Photoluminescence dispersion from a cavity with −43 meV detuning pumped below the lasing threshold, Eth (shown in linear scale). The plot shows the LP emission maximum at each angle (black circles) and a fit to the LP and UP energy (white solid lines), as well as the energy dispersion of the uncoupled cavity, Ecav, and the uncoupled exciton energy, Eex (white dashed lines). (b) Dispersion of same cavity above the lasing threshold, with the intensity shown in logarithmic scale to emphasize that cavity remains in strong coupling above threshold based on the median energies of emission that is not part of the lasing lines (black dots). (c) Emission in momentum space above threshold. (d) Degree of polarization of the emission as a function of angle above and below threshold.
shows the two-dimensional PL dispersion of the polariton cavity with negative cavity-exciton detuning (Δ = −43 meV) under low excitation pulse energy (3.5 μJ/cm2). At this detuning, the exciton and photon fractions are 0.15 and 0.85, respectively. The LP linewidth is 17 meV corresponding to a polariton lifetime of 40 fs. The LP linewidth is determined primarily by the J-aggregate homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening and is not further broadened by the minimal residual absorption of DCM at the cavity resonance energy. The momentum space distribution of the PL shows a wide ± 20° cone emission profile with no observed linear polarization.

Under increasing pump energy (7 μJ/cm2), a collapse in the spectral energy width and momentum dispersion of the polariton emission is observed for the cavity with −43 meV detuning (0.15 exciton fraction) [Fig. 3(b)]. Appearance of multiple narrow linewidth modes with a flat dispersion is indicative of the multimode lasing. The non-lasing emission follows the same polariton dispersion as below threshold, with the lasing lines superimposed in energy onto this polariton mode, indicating that the cavity remains in strong coupling above the lasing threshold. The relative intensity of the multiple lasing modes varies with power, but the energy spacing is nearly uniform at ~2.5 meV. Above the lasing threshold, the momentum space distribution shows a narrow ± 5° emission cone angle. The multiple emission spots produce interference fringes in the overlapping regions in momentum space, indicating that the regions in momentum space are coherent with each other [Fig. 3(c)]. A weak coupling cavity with only the DCM gain layer and no J-aggregate layer showed only a single lasing mode. In the strongly coupled cavity, the emission above threshold shows a high degree of linear polarization (ratio of 6) along the direction of the pump laser polarization, despite the FRET that occurs between Alq3 and DCM molecules, behavior which is also observed in DCM microcavity lasers in weak coupling [23

23. V. G. Kozlov, V. Bulović, and S. R. Forrest, “Temperature independent performance of organic semiconductor lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(18), 2575 (1997). [CrossRef]

]. Due to the amorphous nature of the organic materials, a preferred emission polarization is expected to be set by the pump polarization and not by the cavity structure. The emission in the center of the lasing cone is the most polarized, with spontaneous non-lasing emission at higher angles showing no linear polarization [Fig. 3(f)].

The threshold of nonlinear emission occurs at an absorbed excitation energy density of 6 μJ/cm2, accompanied by a narrowing of the emission line from 17 meV (below threshold) to 0.5 meV (above threshold) [Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Dependence of PL emission intensity at k = 0 as a function of the excitation pulse energy showing a lasing threshold at 6 μJ/cm2. A reduction in the emission linewidth from 7 meV to 0.5 meV is observed at the lasing threshold. (b) Emission spectrum below (0.8Eth excitation energy) and above (1.8Eth excitation energy) the lasing threshold.
]. Saturation of the emission occurs at 8 μJ/cm2. We note that the threshold occurs at an energy density below the onset of exciton-exciton annihilation [10

10. G. M. Akselrod, Y. R. Tischler, E. R. Young, D. G. Nocera, and V. Bulovic, “Exciton-exciton annihilation in organic polariton microcavities,” Phys. Rev. B 82(11), 113106 (2010). [CrossRef]

], which we found to be ~10 μJ/cm2. This input-output dependence is similar to what is observed in DCM VCSELs in weak coupling but the threshold for the polariton cavity at −43 meV detuning is ~2-fold higher than the threshold we find for a DCM VCSEL due to losses in the polariton mode. A nonlinear lasing threshold occurs for polariton cavities with detunings ranging from −35 meV (0.15 exciton fraction at k = 0) to −110 meV (0.04 exciton fraction at k = 0), with a lower lasing energy threshold for more negative detunings. No threshold was observed for detunings of less than −35 meV due to J-aggregate photobleaching on the time scale of measurement time (~30 s). In addition, for detunings of less than −35 meV, an increased exciton fraction results in higher nonradiative loses due to the increasing J-aggregate exciton portion of the exciton-polariton, which was measured to have a PL quantum yield at room temperature of (10 ± 2)%. The multiple spectral lasing modes were only observed for cavities containing J-aggregates, at all detunings, and not for weak coupling cavities containing DCM. The relative intensity of the multiple spectral peaks varies with increasing excitation energy, with a single mode dominating at higher power. The multiple modes can likely be attributed to disorder in the J-aggregate film across the excitation spot, an effect that is also observed in GaN polariton lasing [5

5. S. Christopoulos, G. B. von Högersthal, A. J. Grundy, P. G. Lagoudakis, A. V. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Christmann, R. Butté, E. Feltin, J.-F. Carlin, and N. Grandjean, “Room-temperature polariton lasing in semiconductor microcavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(12), 126405 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

In conclusion, we demonstrate lasing through a strongly coupled mode, achieved by intra-cavity pumping of a J-aggregate organic microcavity at room temperature. The laser shows spectral and momentum space collapse of the emission above threshold while the cavity remains in strong coupling. The laser employs a new architecture in which the strong coupling material is separated from the material that populates the lower polariton branch and creates gain in the cavity. This architecture opens the possibility for building lasers operating through a strongly-coupled mode at a wide range of wavelengths (from UV to NIR) simply by choosing a J-aggregating molecule with the appropriate absorption line and a corresponding, spectrally overlapping organic pump material. Furthermore, organic materials such as DCM could be incorporated with inorganic quantum wells to create hybrid polariton structures with intra-cavity pumping [24

24. V. M. Agranovich, D. M. Basko, and G. C. La Rocca, “Efficient optical pumping of organic-inorganic heterostructures for nonlinear optics,” Phys. Rev. B 86(16), 165204 (2012). [CrossRef]

].

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the Department of Energy, Energy Frontiers Research Center for Excitonics and the National Science Foundation (Award No. 1001994). G. M. A. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and the Hertz Foundation Fellowship. E. R. Y. gratefully acknowledges the National Science Foundation for an American Competitiveness in Chemistry (ACC-F) post-doctoral fellowship (Grant No. CHE-0936816). Measurements were performed in the MIT Nanostructured Materials Metrology Laboratory on equipment provided by the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. The authors thank Professor David Snoke and Professor Marc Baldo for valuable discussions.

References and links

1.

H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, “Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(2), 1489–1537 (2010). [CrossRef]

2.

D. Sanvitto, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, G. Tosi, M. Baudisch, F. P. Laussy, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, L. Marrucci, A. Lemaître, J. Bloch, C. Tejedor, and L. Viña, “Persistent currents and quantized vortices in a polariton superfluid,” Nat. Phys. 6(7), 527–533 (2010). [CrossRef]

3.

K. G. Lagoudakis, M. Wouters, M. Richard, A. Baas, I. Carusotto, R. André, L. S. Dang, and B. Deveaud-Plédran, “Quantized vortices in an exciton–polariton condensate,” Nat. Phys. 4(9), 706–710 (2008). [CrossRef]

4.

R. Balili, V. Hartwell, D. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, “Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap,” Science 316(5827), 1007–1010 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

S. Christopoulos, G. B. von Högersthal, A. J. Grundy, P. G. Lagoudakis, A. V. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Christmann, R. Butté, E. Feltin, J.-F. Carlin, and N. Grandjean, “Room-temperature polariton lasing in semiconductor microcavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(12), 126405 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, M. S. Skolnick, T. Virgili, S. Walker, and D. M. Whittaker, “Strong exciton-photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity,” Nature 395(6697), 53–55 (1998). [CrossRef]

7.

J. R. Tischler, M. S. Bradley, Q. Zhang, T. Atay, A. Nurmikko, and V. Bulovic, “Solid state cavity QED: strong coupling in organic thin films,” Org. Electron. 8(2-3), 94–113 (2007). [CrossRef]

8.

S. Kéna-Cohen and S. R. Forrest, “Room-temperature polariton lasing in an organic single-crystal microcavity,” Nat. Photonics 4(6), 371–375 (2010). [CrossRef]

9.

M. Slootsky, Y. Zhang, and S. R. Forrest, “Temperature dependence of polariton lasing in a crystalline anthracene microcavity,” Phys. Rev. B 86(4), 045312 (2012). [CrossRef]

10.

G. M. Akselrod, Y. R. Tischler, E. R. Young, D. G. Nocera, and V. Bulovic, “Exciton-exciton annihilation in organic polariton microcavities,” Phys. Rev. B 82(11), 113106 (2010). [CrossRef]

11.

C. E. Swenberg, N. E. Geacintov, and M. Pope, “Bimolecular quenching of excitons and fluorescence in the photosynthetic unit,” Biophys. J. 16(12), 1447–1452 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

C. Swenberg and M. Pope, Electronic Processes in Organic Crystals and Polymers (Oxford University Press, 1999).

13.

P. Michetti and G. La Rocca, “Simulation of J-aggregate microcavity photoluminescence,” Phys. Rev. B 77(19), 195301 (2008). [CrossRef]

14.

D. M. Coles, P. Michetti, C. Clark, W. C. Tsoi, A. M. Adawi, J.-S. Kim, and D. G. Lidzey, “Vibrationally assisted polariton-relaxation processes in strongly coupled organic-semiconductor microcavities,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 21(19), 3691–3696 (2011). [CrossRef]

15.

M. Bradley and V. Bulović, “Intracavity optical pumping of J-aggregate microcavity exciton polaritons,” Phys. Rev. B 82(3), 033305 (2010). [CrossRef]

16.

J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, R. André, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and S. Dang, “Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons,” Nature 443(7110), 409–414 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

I. D. W. Samuel and G. A. Turnbull, “Organic semiconductor lasers,” Chem. Rev. 107(4), 1272–1295 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

M. Koschorreck, R. Gehlhaar, V. G. Lyssenko, M. Swoboda, M. Hoffmann, and K. Leo, “Dynamics of a high-Q vertical-cavity organic laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(18), 181108 (2005). [CrossRef]

19.

G. C. La Rocca, “Organic photonics: polariton lasing,” Nat. Photonics 4(6), 343–345 (2010). [CrossRef]

20.

M. S. Bradley, J. R. Tischler, and V. Bulovic, “Layer-by-layer J-aggregate thin films with a peak absorption constant of 10(6) cm(−1),” Adv. Mater. 17(15), 1881–1886 (2005). [CrossRef]

21.

V. Kozlov, V. Bulovic, P. E. Burrows, M. Baldo, V. B. Khalfin, G. Parthasarathy, S. R. Forrest, Y. You, and M. E. Thompson, “Study of lasing action based on Förster energy transfer in optically pumped organic semiconductor thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 84(8), 4096–4108 (1998). [CrossRef]

22.

C. W. Lai, N. Y. Kim, S. Utsunomiya, G. Roumpos, H. Deng, M. D. Fraser, T. Byrnes, P. Recher, N. Kumada, T. Fujisawa, and Y. Yamamoto, “Coherent zero-state and pi-state in an exciton-polariton condensate array.,” Nature 450(7169), 529–532 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

V. G. Kozlov, V. Bulović, and S. R. Forrest, “Temperature independent performance of organic semiconductor lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(18), 2575 (1997). [CrossRef]

24.

V. M. Agranovich, D. M. Basko, and G. C. La Rocca, “Efficient optical pumping of organic-inorganic heterostructures for nonlinear optics,” Phys. Rev. B 86(16), 165204 (2012). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.4890) Materials : Organic materials
(240.5420) Optics at surfaces : Polaritons
(140.3945) Lasers and laser optics : Microcavities

ToC Category:
Lasers and Laser Optics

History
Original Manuscript: April 3, 2013
Revised Manuscript: May 2, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: May 3, 2013
Published: May 10, 2013

Citation
Gleb M. Akselrod, Elizabeth R. Young, M. Scott Bradley, and Vladimir Bulović, "Lasing through a strongly-coupled mode by intra-cavity pumping," Opt. Express 21, 12122-12128 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-10-12122


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, “Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2), 1489–1537 (2010). [CrossRef]
  2. D. Sanvitto, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, G. Tosi, M. Baudisch, F. P. Laussy, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, L. Marrucci, A. Lemaître, J. Bloch, C. Tejedor, and L. Viña, “Persistent currents and quantized vortices in a polariton superfluid,” Nat. Phys.6(7), 527–533 (2010). [CrossRef]
  3. K. G. Lagoudakis, M. Wouters, M. Richard, A. Baas, I. Carusotto, R. André, L. S. Dang, and B. Deveaud-Plédran, “Quantized vortices in an exciton–polariton condensate,” Nat. Phys.4(9), 706–710 (2008). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Balili, V. Hartwell, D. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, “Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap,” Science316(5827), 1007–1010 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. S. Christopoulos, G. B. von Högersthal, A. J. Grundy, P. G. Lagoudakis, A. V. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Christmann, R. Butté, E. Feltin, J.-F. Carlin, and N. Grandjean, “Room-temperature polariton lasing in semiconductor microcavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98(12), 126405 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, M. S. Skolnick, T. Virgili, S. Walker, and D. M. Whittaker, “Strong exciton-photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity,” Nature395(6697), 53–55 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. J. R. Tischler, M. S. Bradley, Q. Zhang, T. Atay, A. Nurmikko, and V. Bulovic, “Solid state cavity QED: strong coupling in organic thin films,” Org. Electron.8(2-3), 94–113 (2007). [CrossRef]
  8. S. Kéna-Cohen and S. R. Forrest, “Room-temperature polariton lasing in an organic single-crystal microcavity,” Nat. Photonics4(6), 371–375 (2010). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Slootsky, Y. Zhang, and S. R. Forrest, “Temperature dependence of polariton lasing in a crystalline anthracene microcavity,” Phys. Rev. B86(4), 045312 (2012). [CrossRef]
  10. G. M. Akselrod, Y. R. Tischler, E. R. Young, D. G. Nocera, and V. Bulovic, “Exciton-exciton annihilation in organic polariton microcavities,” Phys. Rev. B82(11), 113106 (2010). [CrossRef]
  11. C. E. Swenberg, N. E. Geacintov, and M. Pope, “Bimolecular quenching of excitons and fluorescence in the photosynthetic unit,” Biophys. J.16(12), 1447–1452 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. C. Swenberg and M. Pope, Electronic Processes in Organic Crystals and Polymers (Oxford University Press, 1999).
  13. P. Michetti and G. La Rocca, “Simulation of J-aggregate microcavity photoluminescence,” Phys. Rev. B77(19), 195301 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. D. M. Coles, P. Michetti, C. Clark, W. C. Tsoi, A. M. Adawi, J.-S. Kim, and D. G. Lidzey, “Vibrationally assisted polariton-relaxation processes in strongly coupled organic-semiconductor microcavities,” Adv. Funct. Mater.21(19), 3691–3696 (2011). [CrossRef]
  15. M. Bradley and V. Bulović, “Intracavity optical pumping of J-aggregate microcavity exciton polaritons,” Phys. Rev. B82(3), 033305 (2010). [CrossRef]
  16. J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, R. André, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and S. Dang, “Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons,” Nature443(7110), 409–414 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. I. D. W. Samuel and G. A. Turnbull, “Organic semiconductor lasers,” Chem. Rev.107(4), 1272–1295 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. Koschorreck, R. Gehlhaar, V. G. Lyssenko, M. Swoboda, M. Hoffmann, and K. Leo, “Dynamics of a high-Q vertical-cavity organic laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett.87(18), 181108 (2005). [CrossRef]
  19. G. C. La Rocca, “Organic photonics: polariton lasing,” Nat. Photonics4(6), 343–345 (2010). [CrossRef]
  20. M. S. Bradley, J. R. Tischler, and V. Bulovic, “Layer-by-layer J-aggregate thin films with a peak absorption constant of 10(6) cm(−1),” Adv. Mater.17(15), 1881–1886 (2005). [CrossRef]
  21. V. Kozlov, V. Bulovic, P. E. Burrows, M. Baldo, V. B. Khalfin, G. Parthasarathy, S. R. Forrest, Y. You, and M. E. Thompson, “Study of lasing action based on Förster energy transfer in optically pumped organic semiconductor thin films,” J. Appl. Phys.84(8), 4096–4108 (1998). [CrossRef]
  22. C. W. Lai, N. Y. Kim, S. Utsunomiya, G. Roumpos, H. Deng, M. D. Fraser, T. Byrnes, P. Recher, N. Kumada, T. Fujisawa, and Y. Yamamoto, “Coherent zero-state and pi-state in an exciton-polariton condensate array.,” Nature450(7169), 529–532 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. V. G. Kozlov, V. Bulović, and S. R. Forrest, “Temperature independent performance of organic semiconductor lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett.71(18), 2575 (1997). [CrossRef]
  24. V. M. Agranovich, D. M. Basko, and G. C. La Rocca, “Efficient optical pumping of organic-inorganic heterostructures for nonlinear optics,” Phys. Rev. B86(16), 165204 (2012). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited