OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 19 — Sep. 23, 2013
  • pp: 21981–21990
« Show journal navigation

Transferring the attoclock technique to velocity map imaging

Matthias Weger, Jochen Maurer, André Ludwig, Lukas Gallmann, and Ursula Keller  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 19, pp. 21981-21990 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.021981


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1896 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Attosecond angular streaking measurements have revealed deep insights into the timing of tunnel ionization processes of atoms in intense laser fields. So far experiments of this type have been performed only with a cold-target recoil-ion momentum spectrometer (COLTRIMS). Here, we present a way to apply attosecond angular streaking experiments to a velocity map imaging spectrometer (VMIS) with few-cycle pulses at a repetition rate of 10 kHz and a high ionization yield per pulse. Three-dimensional photoelectron momentum distributions from strong-field ionization of helium with an elliptically polarized, sub-10-fs pulse were retrieved by tomographic reconstruction from the momentum space electron images and used for the analysis in the polarization plane.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

In recent years, a number of experiments using the attoclock technique [1

1. P. Eckle, M. Smolarski, P. Schlup, J. Biegert, A. Staudte, M. Schöffler, H. G. Muller, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Attosecond Angular Streaking,” Nat. Phys. 4(7), 565–570 (2008). [CrossRef]

, 2

2. P. Eckle, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. Dörner, H. G. Muller, M. Büttiker, and U. Keller, “Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium,” Science 322(5907), 1525–1529 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] have addressed fundamental questions in ultrafast science, including tunneling delay time [2

2. P. Eckle, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. Dörner, H. G. Muller, M. Büttiker, and U. Keller, “Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium,” Science 322(5907), 1525–1529 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 3

3. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys. 8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]

], tunnel geometry [3

3. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys. 8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]

] release times [4

4. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Timing the release in sequential double ionization,” Nat. Phys. 7(5), 428–433 (2011). [CrossRef]

] and correlations [5

5. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, X. Wang, J. H. Eberly, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Breakdown of the independent electron approximation in sequential double ionization,” New J. Phys. 13(9), 093008 (2011). [CrossRef]

] in sequential double ionization [4

4. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Timing the release in sequential double ionization,” Nat. Phys. 7(5), 428–433 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. This technique uses the angular streaking of the electron and the ion after the ionization of the target to obtain time information about ultrafast processes in atoms and molecules on the attosecond scale. So far all attoclock experiments have been performed with a cold target recoil ion momentum spectrometer (COLTRIMS) [6

6. J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, A. Dorn, R. Dorner, L. P. H. Schmidt, and H. Schmidt-Bocking, “Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 66(9), 1463–1545 (2003). [CrossRef]

], a coincidence detector that offers the possibility to record the full kinematic information of each ionization event. The drawbacks of COLTRIMS measurements are the restriction to a low count rate originating from the coincidence detection and the rather low momentum resolution compared to other momentum imaging techniques. Most recently, moving from 1-kHz to 10-kHz pulse repetition rates for COLTRIMS measurements the attoclock method was used to resolve an angular offset that suggests a real and probabilistic tunneling time [7

7. A. S. Landsman, M. Weger, J. Maurer, R. Boge, A. Ludwig, S. Heuser, C. Cirelli, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “Tunneling time in ultrafast science is real and probabilistic,” arXiv:1301.2766 (2013).

].

A different charged-particle momentum imaging technique that is widely used in atomic, molecular and optical science is velocity map imaging (VMI) [8

8. A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, “Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68(9), 3477–3484 (1997). [CrossRef]

,9

9. D. H. Parker and A. T. J. B. Eppink, “Photoelectron and photofragment velocity map imaging of state-selected molecular oxygen dissociation/ionization dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 107(7), 2357–2362 (1997). [CrossRef]

]. It offers reduced technical complexity, higher momentum resolution and a significantly higher ionization yield per pulse compared to a COLTRIMS setup. Because the ionization rate and thus the signal strength are only restricted by the onset of space charge effects, the setup allows few hundred ionization events per laser pulse. A velocity map imaging spectrometer (VMIS) images only two-dimensional projections of the charged particle distribution, typically in the set of planes that are perpendicular to the polarization plane. The polarization plane, i.e. the plane perpendicular to the beam propagation direction, is, however, the plane of interest in attoclock experiments. The demand to exploit the momentum distribution in three dimensions and in particular the polarization plane is fulfilled by the combination of VMI and tomographic reconstruction that has been used by various groups in several applications in atomic, molecular and optical science [10

10. M. Wollenhaupt, M. Krug, J. Kohler, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, and T. Baumert, “Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction of ultrashort free electron wave packets,” Appl. Phys. B 95(4), 647–651 (2009). [CrossRef]

13

13. P. Hockett, M. Staniforth, and K. L. Reid, “Photoelectron angular distributions from rotationally state-selected NH3((BE)-E-1 “): dependence on ion rotational state and polarization geometry,” Mol. Phys. 108(7-9), 1045–1054 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. The method can be used for momentum distributions with arbitrary symmetry. A different and more common method to retrieve three-dimensional charged particle distributions from two-dimensional projections is the application of a reconstruction algorithm that results in an Abel-inversion, like e.g. BASEX [14

14. V. Dribinski, A. Ossadtchi, V. A. Mandelshtam, and H. Reisler, “Reconstruction of Abel-transformable Images: The Gaussian basis-set expansion Abel transform method,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73(7), 2634–2642 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. Algorithms that create an Abel inversion are however restricted to momentum distributions with cylindrical symmetry.

In this article, we present a way to implement the attoclock with a VMIS with high count rate and thus short data acquisition time and high momentum resolution employing few-cycle pulses. The article is structured as follows. In section 2, we give an introduction to the attoclock method. The experimental details are described in section 3 and the data processing, analysis and results are described in section 4. Furthermore, the results are compared with COLTRIMS measurements. The conclusions drawn from the work in this article follow in section 5.

2. Principle of the attoclock

The attoclock technique has been used to experimentally resolve the single electron tunneling delay time for the first time [2

2. P. Eckle, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. Dörner, H. G. Muller, M. Büttiker, and U. Keller, “Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium,” Science 322(5907), 1525–1529 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,7

7. A. S. Landsman, M. Weger, J. Maurer, R. Boge, A. Ludwig, S. Heuser, C. Cirelli, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “Tunneling time in ultrafast science is real and probabilistic,” arXiv:1301.2766 (2013).

]. How to measure a tunneling time has been a long ongoing debate because time is not an operator in quantum mechanics. For example, very often the exact start of the tunnel process is also not well defined.

The final electron momentum vector from strong-field-ionized helium can be well explained by a semi-classical model [16

16. P. B. Corkum, “Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71(13), 1994–1997 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] with two steps: the first step is the electron tunneling only described in quantum mechanics and the second step is the classical electron propagation in the laser field and ion potential. Models that neglect the interaction between the electron and the ion, predict a final angular coordinate (i.e. the streaking angle) of 90 degrees between the major axis of the polarization ellipse and the peak of the photoelectron angular distribution assuming no tunneling delay time [17

17. M. Smolarski, P. Eckle, U. Keller, and R. Dörner, “Semiclassical model for attosecond angular streaking,” Opt. Express 18(17), 17640–17650 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In helium the ion potential is very simple and combined with the laser field we have a well-defined tunnel geometry [3

3. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys. 8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]

] from which we can resolve and reconstruct the electron tunneling delay in this two-step model [7

7. A. S. Landsman, M. Weger, J. Maurer, R. Boge, A. Ludwig, S. Heuser, C. Cirelli, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “Tunneling time in ultrafast science is real and probabilistic,” arXiv:1301.2766 (2013).

].

Therefore, the key elements of an attoclock measurement are elliptically polarized few-cycle pulses, accurate polarization control and a detector that is capable of imaging three dimensional momentum distributions of charged particles (electrons or ions).

3. Experimental details

3.1 Velocity map imaging spectrometer

For the experiments we designed and built a VMIS that meets the requirement of high ionization rate and offers a back-focusing geometry. A schematic of the setup is shown in Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic of a cut through the VMIS. The incoming laser beam is marked in red.
. In our case a high count rate is of particular interest since the tomographic reconstruction requires good statistics to allow for extraction of distributions that are free of artifacts and low in noise. In order to achieve high count rates and to keep the data acquisition time as low as possible, it is desirable to have a high pulse repetition rate as well as a high number of ionized electrons per pulse. A high number of ionization events per pulse is achieved by the high target density in the focal volume in combination with an adequate laser peak intensity. Typical data acquisition times range from few minutes up to two hours, depending on the laser intensity. The acquisition time for the data shown in Fig. 6 was 40 minutes. The high target density in the interaction volume is accomplished with a rather unconventional design with the gas nozzle integrated into the repeller plate [18

18. O. Ghafur, W. Siu, P. Johnsson, M. F. Kling, M. Drescher, and M. J. J. Vrakking, “A velocity map imaging detector with an integrated gas injection system,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80(3), 033110 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The use of few-cycle pulses dictates the back-focusing geometry. A silver mirror with focal length of 50 mm was used to create a tight focus with a short Rayleigh length. Since the special repeller design with the integrated gas nozzle leads to a decreased region with optimal electron imaging compared to setups with three open electrodes, it is beneficial to have a short Rayleigh length to keep the volume where the electrons are created as small as possible. From simulations we know that a resolution of Δp/p0.01 is achieved for electrons that are created 1 mm apart from each other in the interaction region. Thus, the resolution in momenta for electrons in the VMIS is better than the resolution of 0.05-0.2 a.u. for ions and around 0.1 a.u. for electrons in the COLTRIMS. Since the Rayleigh length is smaller than 1 mm for our beam and the chosen focal length of 50 mm, we make sure that the photoelectrons are created within the imaging volume. Although the back-focusing mirror poses the complexity of having an additional potential surface between the electrodes, we ensured that the mirror is not a problem for high-quality electron momentum imaging. This was validated with the ring structure from above threshold ionization [19

19. P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray, G. Petite, and N. K. Rahman, “Free-free transitions following six-photon ionization of xenon atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(17), 1127–1130 (1979). [CrossRef]

] that is shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Electron momentum images recorded with linear light. (a) An original momentum image as it was recorded plotted linearly scaled. (b) A cut through the three-dimensional electron momentum distribution of the image in (a) after reconstruction with BASEX and plotted on a logarithmic scale. The ATI-structure confirms the high quality of the momentum imaging.
. The absence of any molecular contaminant was confirmed by the absence of any Coulomb explosion channels [20

20. F. Légaré, K. F. Lee, I. V. Litvinyuk, P. W. Dooley, S. S. Wesolowski, P. R. Bunker, P. Dombi, F. Krausz, A. D. Bandrauk, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Laser Coulomb-explosion imaging of small molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 71(1), 013415 (2005). [CrossRef]

] when the spectrometer voltages were switched to ion imaging. An example of an ion image recorded with linear polarization is shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Ion image on logarithmic scale recorded with linear polarization at an intensity of ~0.2 PW/cm2. The circles indicate the expected momenta of ion fragments H+, O+, N+ from Coulomb explosion of H2, O2 and N2. (b) Radial distribution of the ions from the image in Fig. (a) on a logarithmic scale.
. This is of course important to make sure that our reconstruction is based on data from helium ionization because the VMIS is not based on coincidence detection. The background pressure was on the order of 10−10 mbar.

3.2 Optical setup

A commercial Ti:sapphire laser system with a multipass amplifier (Femtolasers, Femtopower Compact Pro HR CEP) that delivers pulse energies of up to 750 µJ at a central wavelength of 797 nm and a pulse length of 30 fs at a repetition rate of 10 kHz was used for the experiment. The output from the amplifier was spectrally broadened in a hollow-core fiber filled with approximately 1 bar of neon and recompressed by a chirped-mirror compressor (Femtolasers, GSM 014). The pulse length was minimized by inserting an appropriate amount of fused silica into the beam path. The pulse characterization with a SPIDER resulted in a measured pulse length of 6.1 fs at a central wavelength of 735 nm. Before the pulse entered the vacuum chamber through the entrance window it passed a polarizer, a quarter quarter-wave plate (QWP) and a half-wave plate (HWP). The polarizer (Newport polarcor 05P109AR.16) ensured a clean linear polarization state of the beam before the pulse passes through the QWP. The desired ellipticity of 0.87 was induced by the quarter-wave plate (B.Halle Nachfl. GmbH RAC 5.4.10L). For the acquisition of the electron images under a large number of angles, the polarization was rotated by a superachromatic HWP (B.Halle Nachfl. GmbH RSO 2.2.10) that was mounted on a motorized rotational stage with an electronic readout with a resolution of better than 0.1 degree. The angular orientation of the waveplate is read out from an encoder on the waveplate mount. This method to determine and control the orientation of the waveplate removes any susceptibility to backlash of the rotational mount. The polarization control is discussed in more detail in section 3.4.

3.3 Polarization characterization

The polarization was characterized with a beam-splitting cube polarizer followed by a power meter that was placed between the optical setup and the entrance window of the VMIS. The transmission through the polarizer was measured as a function of the orientation of the major polarization axis. The result gives a calibration of the orientation of the major polarization axis with respect to the laboratory frame. The result was fitted with a cos2 function. The ellipticity and the orientation of the HWP for which the major polarization axis lies horizontally in the laboratory frame were extracted from the fit. A reconstructed electron momentum distribution from linearly polarized pulses was used to cross-check the result from the polarimetry.

3.4 Polarization control

An excellent control over the polarization of the laser pulse is crucial for the attoclock experiments. In our case, an accuracy of better than a few degrees is required. The use of few-cycle laser pulses with a large bandwidth poses further challenges on the control of the polarization. Dispersion is a concern with regard to the wavelength dependence of the retardation as well as the temporal spreading of the short pulses that is induced by the retarding material. The dependence of the streaking angle on the ellipticity leads to inaccurate results when the experimentally obtained streaking angle is compared with the theoretical value assuming a wrong ellipticity. Furthermore, the orientation of the major polarization axis with respect to the detector needs to be well characterized for accurate results. In order to quantify the error that is induced by the waveplates, we numerically propagated the pulse through these plates based on the specifications obtained from the manufacturer and the measured spectrum of our laser pulse [17

17. M. Smolarski, P. Eckle, U. Keller, and R. Dörner, “Semiclassical model for attosecond angular streaking,” Opt. Express 18(17), 17640–17650 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Polarimetry measurements were done for two different types of HWPs, an achromatic and a superachromatic HWP from B.Halle Nachfl. GmbH. The results shown in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Data from the polarimetry measurements. (a) Achromatic HWP. The data were fitted by a sum of two weighted cos2-functions. The data show a clear deviation from the expected behavior. Ideally, the peaks have the same height and are separated by 180 degrees from each other. (b) Superachromatic HWP. The peaks have the expected height and periodicity.
indicate that it is necessary to use the superachromatic HWP for our experiment in order to achieve a sufficiently well-defined polarization state of our few-cycle pulses. This choice becomes obvious from our simulation shown in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Simulations of the pulse propagation through the achromatic (upper row, a-c) and superachromatic (lower row, d-f) waveplates. The plots show the transmission through a polarizer as a function of the orientations of the polarizer and the HWP (a and d, the ellipticity as a function of the rotation angle of the HWP (b and e), and the dependence of the angle of the major axis of the polarization ellipse on the rotation of the HWP (c and f). The results demonstrate how crucial the proper choice of waveplate is.
of the ellipticity as well as the polarizer transmission as a function of the angle of the HWP. For the large bandwidths in our experiment, the simulations show the desired behavior only for the superachromatic waveplate, i.e. the orientation of the major polarization axis depends linearly on the orientation of the HWP and the ellipticity is independent of the orientation of the HWP within a deviation of 0.08% in ellipticity.

4. Data processing and results

4.1 Tomographic reconstruction

In principle the VMIS only allows to record two-dimensional projections of the actual three-dimensional electron distribution in the momentum space. In its typical geometry, a VMIS does not allow to record projections in the polarization plane, i.e. the plane of interest in angular streaking experiments. This matter can be overcome with tomographic reconstruction. A widely used, fast and efficient method for tomographic reconstruction is the filtered back-projection algorithm [21

21. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomography (IEEE Press, 1988).

]. The combination of tomographic reconstruction with VMI was pioneered [10

10. M. Wollenhaupt, M. Krug, J. Kohler, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, and T. Baumert, “Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction of ultrashort free electron wave packets,” Appl. Phys. B 95(4), 647–651 (2009). [CrossRef]

,11

11. C. Smeenk, L. Arissian, A. Staudte, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Momentum space tomographic imaging of photoelectrons,” J. Phys. B 42, 185402 (2009).

] and successfully applied [12

12. J. Maurer, D. Dimitrovski, L. Christensen, L. B. Madsen, and H. Stapelfeldt, “Molecular-frame 3D photoelectron momentum distributions by tomographic reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(12), 123001 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,13

13. P. Hockett, M. Staniforth, and K. L. Reid, “Photoelectron angular distributions from rotationally state-selected NH3((BE)-E-1 “): dependence on ion rotational state and polarization geometry,” Mol. Phys. 108(7-9), 1045–1054 (2010). [CrossRef]

] by various research groups in experiments on atoms and molecules. The algorithm performs the slice-wise reconstruction along the laser propagation direction on the basis of a Fourier transform. The reconstructed momentum distribution for each slice in the direction of beam propagation can be expressed as follows
f(px,py)=+dω0πdθP(ω,θ)|ω|ei2πωt
(1)
where θ denotes the projection angle, ω the frequency space coordinate and P(ω,θ) the Fourier transform of the corresponding projection [21

21. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomography (IEEE Press, 1988).

]. The momentum coordinate py points along the major axis and the momentum coordinate px along the minor axis of the polarization ellipse. The parameter t=pxcosθ+pysinθ denotes the coordinate along the projection plane. The reconstruction is performed slicewise along the beam propagation direction. In order to reduce artifacts from the reconstruction and to filter out high-frequency noise, a filter function with an appropriate cut-off frequency can be applied during the reconstruction. A variety of filters were designed for this purpose. In our case, a Hann-filter proved to be an excellent choice for the reconstruction of the full three-dimensional electron momentum distribution. If one is only interested in the projection onto the polarization plane, it is possible to project the electron images onto this plane prior to the reconstruction. For the analysis of the streaking angle we chose the latter method for numerical efficiency and without any significant effect on the extracted angle. Since the detector showed slightly non-uniform detection efficiency, the images were symmetrized on the beam propagation axis. As an angular step size, two degrees turned out to be an excellent choice for our purposes.

4.2 Analysis

For consistency, the same analysis approach as for earlier measurements with the COLTRIMS was chosen. The radially integrated angular distribution of the electrons was calculated from the reconstructed photoelectron distributions that were projected along the beam propagation direction, i.e. the data were integrated along the beam propagation direction, and fitted with a double peak Gaussian function. The peak location determined in this way was used as the streaking angle. An example for a photoelectron angular distribution together with a fit is shown in the inset of Fig. 7 Potential ionization delay times manifest themselves in an offset from a theoretical curve assuming instantaneous ionization. The fitting procedure is justified since the same method was used in the simulations that are used as a reference for the time zero. In our case, classical trajectory Monte-Carlo simulations using the tunnel ionization in a field induced tunnel barrier in parabolic coordinates was used for helium [3

3. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys. 8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. The tunnel barrier is further modified by an induced dipole and Stark shift in other noble gases as described with the TIPIS (tunnel ionization in parabolic coordinates with induced dipole and Stark shift) model [3

3. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys. 8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]

].

4.3 Results and comparison with data from COLTRIMS

5. Conclusion

We presented an alternative implementation of the attoclock with few-cycle pulses at a high repetition rate and count rate per pulse. The comparatively low technical complexity on the side of the vacuum chamber and the electronics eases the use of more complex targets, like e.g. molecules in gas phase. The high count and repetition rates and the correspondingly reduced acquisition time allows one to vary several parameters in the measurements while maintaining reasonable measurement times. In this work we varied the intensity of the driving laser. Another major advantage with respect to a COLTRIMS setup is the high momentum resolution that can be achieved in a VMI. However, this comes at the price of losing the ability to perform coincidence measurements. Few VMI setups have been reported to be capable of coincidence detection [22

22. C. S. Lehmann, N. B. Ram, and M. H. M. Janssen, “Velocity map photoelectron-photoion coincidence imaging on a single detector,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83(9), 093103 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24

24. A. Vredenborg, W. G. Roeterdink, and M. H. M. Janssen, “A photoelectron-photoion coincidence imaging apparatus for femtosecond time-resolved molecular dynamics with electron time-of-flight resolution of sigma=18 ps and energy resolution Delta E/E=3.5%,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79(6), 063108 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Here, we described the experimental details transferring the attoclock technique to a VMIS with few-cycle pulses. This approach fully benefits from high repetition and count rates. The essential electron momentum distribution was retrieved with tomographic reconstruction. Crucial elements are the waveplates, in particular the HWP that is rotated to record images for the set of angles that is required for the tomographic reconstruction. It was demonstrated in the experiment and supported by simulations that the usage of superachromatic waveplates is necessary for the broad bandwidth that is associated with few-cycle pulses. The continuous gas flow and the back-focusing geometry that allows high peak intensity and short pulses at a high target density calls for further applications in atomic, molecular and optical science with a variety of laser sources and targets.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Centres of Competence in Research Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology (NCCR MUST), research instrument of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). This project has been co-financed under FP7 Marie Curie COFUND.

References

1.

P. Eckle, M. Smolarski, P. Schlup, J. Biegert, A. Staudte, M. Schöffler, H. G. Muller, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Attosecond Angular Streaking,” Nat. Phys. 4(7), 565–570 (2008). [CrossRef]

2.

P. Eckle, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. Dörner, H. G. Muller, M. Büttiker, and U. Keller, “Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium,” Science 322(5907), 1525–1529 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys. 8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]

4.

A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Timing the release in sequential double ionization,” Nat. Phys. 7(5), 428–433 (2011). [CrossRef]

5.

A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, X. Wang, J. H. Eberly, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Breakdown of the independent electron approximation in sequential double ionization,” New J. Phys. 13(9), 093008 (2011). [CrossRef]

6.

J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, A. Dorn, R. Dorner, L. P. H. Schmidt, and H. Schmidt-Bocking, “Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 66(9), 1463–1545 (2003). [CrossRef]

7.

A. S. Landsman, M. Weger, J. Maurer, R. Boge, A. Ludwig, S. Heuser, C. Cirelli, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “Tunneling time in ultrafast science is real and probabilistic,” arXiv:1301.2766 (2013).

8.

A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, “Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68(9), 3477–3484 (1997). [CrossRef]

9.

D. H. Parker and A. T. J. B. Eppink, “Photoelectron and photofragment velocity map imaging of state-selected molecular oxygen dissociation/ionization dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys. 107(7), 2357–2362 (1997). [CrossRef]

10.

M. Wollenhaupt, M. Krug, J. Kohler, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, and T. Baumert, “Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction of ultrashort free electron wave packets,” Appl. Phys. B 95(4), 647–651 (2009). [CrossRef]

11.

C. Smeenk, L. Arissian, A. Staudte, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Momentum space tomographic imaging of photoelectrons,” J. Phys. B 42, 185402 (2009).

12.

J. Maurer, D. Dimitrovski, L. Christensen, L. B. Madsen, and H. Stapelfeldt, “Molecular-frame 3D photoelectron momentum distributions by tomographic reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(12), 123001 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

P. Hockett, M. Staniforth, and K. L. Reid, “Photoelectron angular distributions from rotationally state-selected NH3((BE)-E-1 “): dependence on ion rotational state and polarization geometry,” Mol. Phys. 108(7-9), 1045–1054 (2010). [CrossRef]

14.

V. Dribinski, A. Ossadtchi, V. A. Mandelshtam, and H. Reisler, “Reconstruction of Abel-transformable Images: The Gaussian basis-set expansion Abel transform method,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73(7), 2634–2642 (2002). [CrossRef]

15.

C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley, “Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses,” Opt. Lett. 23(10), 792–794 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

P. B. Corkum, “Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71(13), 1994–1997 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

M. Smolarski, P. Eckle, U. Keller, and R. Dörner, “Semiclassical model for attosecond angular streaking,” Opt. Express 18(17), 17640–17650 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

O. Ghafur, W. Siu, P. Johnsson, M. F. Kling, M. Drescher, and M. J. J. Vrakking, “A velocity map imaging detector with an integrated gas injection system,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80(3), 033110 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray, G. Petite, and N. K. Rahman, “Free-free transitions following six-photon ionization of xenon atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(17), 1127–1130 (1979). [CrossRef]

20.

F. Légaré, K. F. Lee, I. V. Litvinyuk, P. W. Dooley, S. S. Wesolowski, P. R. Bunker, P. Dombi, F. Krausz, A. D. Bandrauk, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Laser Coulomb-explosion imaging of small molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 71(1), 013415 (2005). [CrossRef]

21.

A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomography (IEEE Press, 1988).

22.

C. S. Lehmann, N. B. Ram, and M. H. M. Janssen, “Velocity map photoelectron-photoion coincidence imaging on a single detector,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83(9), 093103 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

D. Rolles, Z. D. Pešić, M. Perri, R. C. Bilodeau, G. D. Ackerman, B. S. Rude, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, J. D. Bozek, and N. Berrah, “A velocity map imaging spectrometer for electron-ion and ion-ion coincidence experiments with synchrotron radiation,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 261(1-2), 170–174 (2007). [CrossRef]

24.

A. Vredenborg, W. G. Roeterdink, and M. H. M. Janssen, “A photoelectron-photoion coincidence imaging apparatus for femtosecond time-resolved molecular dynamics with electron time-of-flight resolution of sigma=18 ps and energy resolution Delta E/E=3.5%,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79(6), 063108 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(020.0020) Atomic and molecular physics : Atomic and molecular physics
(020.2649) Atomic and molecular physics : Strong field laser physics

ToC Category:
Atomic and Molecular Physics

History
Original Manuscript: July 4, 2013
Revised Manuscript: September 2, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: September 2, 2013
Published: September 11, 2013

Citation
Matthias Weger, Jochen Maurer, André Ludwig, Lukas Gallmann, and Ursula Keller, "Transferring the attoclock technique to velocity map imaging," Opt. Express 21, 21981-21990 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-19-21981


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. Eckle, M. Smolarski, P. Schlup, J. Biegert, A. Staudte, M. Schöffler, H. G. Muller, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Attosecond Angular Streaking,” Nat. Phys.4(7), 565–570 (2008). [CrossRef]
  2. P. Eckle, A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, A. Staudte, R. Dörner, H. G. Muller, M. Büttiker, and U. Keller, “Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in helium,” Science322(5907), 1525–1529 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, “Attoclock reveals natural coordinates of the laser-induced tunnelling current flow in atoms,” Nat. Phys.8(1), 76–80 (2011). [CrossRef]
  4. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Timing the release in sequential double ionization,” Nat. Phys.7(5), 428–433 (2011). [CrossRef]
  5. A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, X. Wang, J. H. Eberly, R. Dörner, and U. Keller, “Breakdown of the independent electron approximation in sequential double ionization,” New J. Phys.13(9), 093008 (2011). [CrossRef]
  6. J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, A. Dorn, R. Dorner, L. P. H. Schmidt, and H. Schmidt-Bocking, “Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes,” Rep. Prog. Phys.66(9), 1463–1545 (2003). [CrossRef]
  7. A. S. Landsman, M. Weger, J. Maurer, R. Boge, A. Ludwig, S. Heuser, C. Cirelli, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “Tunneling time in ultrafast science is real and probabilistic,” arXiv:1301.2766 (2013).
  8. A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, “Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.68(9), 3477–3484 (1997). [CrossRef]
  9. D. H. Parker and A. T. J. B. Eppink, “Photoelectron and photofragment velocity map imaging of state-selected molecular oxygen dissociation/ionization dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys.107(7), 2357–2362 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Wollenhaupt, M. Krug, J. Kohler, T. Bayer, C. Sarpe-Tudoran, and T. Baumert, “Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction of ultrashort free electron wave packets,” Appl. Phys. B95(4), 647–651 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. C. Smeenk, L. Arissian, A. Staudte, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Momentum space tomographic imaging of photoelectrons,” J. Phys. B42, 185402 (2009).
  12. J. Maurer, D. Dimitrovski, L. Christensen, L. B. Madsen, and H. Stapelfeldt, “Molecular-frame 3D photoelectron momentum distributions by tomographic reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109(12), 123001 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. P. Hockett, M. Staniforth, and K. L. Reid, “Photoelectron angular distributions from rotationally state-selected NH3((BE)-E-1 “): dependence on ion rotational state and polarization geometry,” Mol. Phys.108(7-9), 1045–1054 (2010). [CrossRef]
  14. V. Dribinski, A. Ossadtchi, V. A. Mandelshtam, and H. Reisler, “Reconstruction of Abel-transformable Images: The Gaussian basis-set expansion Abel transform method,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.73(7), 2634–2642 (2002). [CrossRef]
  15. C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley, “Spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses,” Opt. Lett.23(10), 792–794 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. P. B. Corkum, “Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71(13), 1994–1997 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. M. Smolarski, P. Eckle, U. Keller, and R. Dörner, “Semiclassical model for attosecond angular streaking,” Opt. Express18(17), 17640–17650 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. O. Ghafur, W. Siu, P. Johnsson, M. F. Kling, M. Drescher, and M. J. J. Vrakking, “A velocity map imaging detector with an integrated gas injection system,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.80(3), 033110 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray, G. Petite, and N. K. Rahman, “Free-free transitions following six-photon ionization of xenon atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett.42(17), 1127–1130 (1979). [CrossRef]
  20. F. Légaré, K. F. Lee, I. V. Litvinyuk, P. W. Dooley, S. S. Wesolowski, P. R. Bunker, P. Dombi, F. Krausz, A. D. Bandrauk, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Laser Coulomb-explosion imaging of small molecules,” Phys. Rev. A71(1), 013415 (2005). [CrossRef]
  21. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomography (IEEE Press, 1988).
  22. C. S. Lehmann, N. B. Ram, and M. H. M. Janssen, “Velocity map photoelectron-photoion coincidence imaging on a single detector,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.83(9), 093103 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. D. Rolles, Z. D. Pešić, M. Perri, R. C. Bilodeau, G. D. Ackerman, B. S. Rude, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, J. D. Bozek, and N. Berrah, “A velocity map imaging spectrometer for electron-ion and ion-ion coincidence experiments with synchrotron radiation,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B261(1-2), 170–174 (2007). [CrossRef]
  24. A. Vredenborg, W. G. Roeterdink, and M. H. M. Janssen, “A photoelectron-photoion coincidence imaging apparatus for femtosecond time-resolved molecular dynamics with electron time-of-flight resolution of sigma=18 ps and energy resolution Delta E/E=3.5%,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.79(6), 063108 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited