Reanalysis of generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators

doi:10.1364/OE.21.002297

« Show journal navigation

Reanalysis of generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators

Jie Yuan, Meixiong Chen, Yingying Li, Zhongqi Tan, and Zhiguo Wang »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 2297-2306 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.002297

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1060 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Analysis method
3. Analysis results of the generalized sensitivity factors
4. Conclusion
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (20)
Cited By
Figures (7)
Metrics

Abstract

By utilizing the novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection and the generalized ray matrix for spherical mirror reflection, the generalized sensitivity factors SD1, ST1, SD2 and ST2 influenced by both the radial and axial displacements of a spherical mirror in a nonplanar ring resonator have been obtained. Besides, the singular points of different kinds of non-planar ring resonators under the conditions of incident angle A ranging from 0° to 45° or total coordinate rotation angle ρ ranging from 0°to 360°have also been obtained through the analysis of the determinant of the coefficient matrix of the linear equations. The analysis in this paper is important to the cavity design of non-planar ring resonators and it could be helpful to avoid the violent movement of the optical-axis to small misalignment of the mirrors in non-planar ring resonators.

1. Introduction

There have been some kinds of planar ring resonators which are widely used for laser gyroscopes [1

W. W. Chow, J. Gea-Banacloche, L. M. Pedrotti, V. E. Sanders, W. Schleich, and M. O. Scully, “The ring laser gyro,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(1), 61–104 (1985). [CrossRef]

–3

A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science, 1986).

]. Non-planar ring resonators (NPRO) are also widely used for high precision ring laser gyroscopes including Zero-Lock Laser Gyroscopes [1

W. W. Chow, J. Gea-Banacloche, L. M. Pedrotti, V. E. Sanders, W. Schleich, and M. O. Scully, “The ring laser gyro,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(1), 61–104 (1985). [CrossRef]

–9

J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett. 37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The ray matrix technique is a fast way to gain an understanding of how a ray of light propagates through a series of optics [3

A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science, 1986).

], and augmented ray matrix method has been widely used for optical-axis perturbation analyzing in planar or non-planar ring resonators [3

A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science, 1986).

–20

H. Z. Liu, L. R. Liu, R. W. Xu, and Z. Luan, “ABCD matrix for reflection and refraction of Gaussian beams at the surface of a parabola of revolution,” Appl. Opt. 44(23), 4809–4813 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

The coordinate system of Gaussian beam reflection is important because it is the bridge between the theoretical analysis and experimental research. For example, one can find out the perturbation direction of optical-axis in optical-axis analysis by referring to the detailed coordinate system. Traditional ray matrices should be based on suitable coordinate systems and the ray matrices should be consistent with related coordinate systems. In another word, before deducing the ray matrices, the suitable coordinate system should be established. The traditional ABCD ray matrix of Gaussian beam reflection is not consistent with traditional coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection (TCS) because incorrect position of beam will be obtained in the numerical analyses by utilizing TCS. To solve this inconsistency, novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection (NCS) has been proposed in Ref. [9

J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett. 37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and NCS is consistent with traditional ABCD ray matrix of Gaussian beam reflection [9

J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett. 37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The generalized ray matrix of spherical mirror reflection in Ref. [10

J. Yuan, X. W. Long, and M. X. Chen, “Generalized ray matrix for spherical mirror reflection and its application in square ring resonators and monolithic triaxial ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(7), 6762–6776 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] is obtained based on NCS. By utilizing NCS, the optical-axis perturbation rules of square ring resonators have been obtained and the validity of NCS has been approved by related optical-axis experiments [9

J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett. 37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,10

]. There exist problems in many analytical results of several other related articles because those analyses are based on TCS. Those related articles have been listed and discussed in detail in ref 0.9 [4

G. A. Massey and A. E. Siegman, “Reflection and refraction of Gaussian light beams at tilted ellipsoidal surfaces,” Appl. Opt. 8(5), 975–978 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,17

Y. X. Zhao, M. G. Sceats, and A. D. Stokes, “Application of ray tracing to the design of a monolithic nonplanar ring laser,” Appl. Opt. 30(36), 5235–5238 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–20

The numerical analysis results of sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in NPRO have been obtained in Refs. [6

S.-C. Sheng, “Optical-axis perturbation singularity in an out-of-plane ring resonator,” Opt. Lett. 19(10), 683–685 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and those results are incorrect because those analysis are based on TCS [6

S.-C. Sheng, “Optical-axis perturbation singularity in an out-of-plane ring resonator,” Opt. Lett. 19(10), 683–685 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. By utilizing NCS, generalized sensitivity factors influenced by both the radial and axial displacements of a spherical mirror in NPRO have been obtained in this article. Besides, the singular points of different kinds of NPRO under the conditions of incident angle A ranging from 0° to 45° or total coordinate rotation angle ρ ranging from 0°to 360°have also been obtained. These analyses are important to the cavity design of NPRO and it could be helpful to avoid the violent movement of the optical-axis to small misalignment of the mirrors in NPRO.

2. Analysis method

As shown in Fig. 1, let’s take the four-equal-sided non-planar ring resonator (NPRO) as an example and assume that the resonator contains four segments. Each of the segments has a free-space propagation Lj (j = 1, 2, 3, 4), a reflection on one spherical mirror m_j with radius of curvature R_j (infinite for the plane mirror), an incident angle Aj and a coordinate rotation angle φj. β is the folded angle.

Fig. 1 Geometrical construction of a four-equal-sided non-planar ring resonator (NPRO), m_j(j = 1,2,3,4):reflecting mirror with radius of R_j(j = 1,2,3,4), P_j(j = 1,2,3,4): terminal points of the resonator.

The matrix for spherical mirror reflection and matrix for such a single segment as shown in Fig. 1:

M (R_{j}, A_{j}) = [\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 δ_{j z} \cdot \sin (A_{i}) \\ - \frac{2}{R_{j} \cdot \cos (A_{j})} & 1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{- 2 δ_{j z} \cdot \tan (A_{j})}{R_{j}} + 2 (θ_{j x} + \frac{δ_{j x}}{R_{j}}) \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - \frac{2 \times \cos (A_{j})}{R_{j}} & 1 & 2 (θ_{j y} + \frac{δ_{j y}}{R_{j}}) \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}] .

(1)

M_{j} = R (φ_{j}) M (R_{j}, A_{j}) T (L_{j})

(2)

where, θ_jx and θ_jy are the misalignment angles of the spherical mirror mj in its local tangential and sagittal planes respectively; δjx and δjy are the radial displacements, and δjz is the axial displacement. T(L_j) and R(φ_j) represent the matrices for free space propagation and coordinate rotation respectively.

M(R_j, A_j) is dependent on the detailed coordinate system and φ_j should be illustrated in the detailed coordinate system. The form of M(R_j, A_j) shown in Eq. (1) is not independent and it is dependent on the detailed coordinate system. A positive or negative sign may be added to δjz in the standard ray-matrix elements M(R_j,A_j)(1, 5) and M(R_j,A_j)(2, 5) for different mirrors with the consideration of the detailed coordinate system [10

]. It would be better for M(R_j,A_j) to be replaced by M(m_j) which represents the matrix of mirror m_j. and then Eq. (2) became

M_{j} = R (φ_{j}) M (m_{j}) T (L_{j}) .

(3)

Some of the φ_j and the R(φ_j) used in Refs. [7

J. Yuan and X. W. Long, “Optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Commun. 281(5), 1204–1210 (2008). [CrossRef]

] and [8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] are incorrect and M(m_j) of some mirrors are incorrect too. Therefore, the results of Refs. [7

J. Yuan and X. W. Long, “Optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Commun. 281(5), 1204–1210 (2008). [CrossRef]

] and [8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] are incorrect.

NPRO for numerical analysis is shown in Fig. 2 with detailed coordinate axes, where m₁, m₂ are spherical mirrors with the identical radius of curvature R. The incident angles on all four mirrors are identical [7

J. Yuan and X. W. Long, “Optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Commun. 281(5), 1204–1210 (2008). [CrossRef]

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], i.e. A₁ = A₂ = A₃ = A₄ = A. The cavity lengths of all four sides are equal and the total cavity length is L.

Fig. 2 Coordinate systems and corresponding coordinate rotations based on traditional coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection (TCS) and novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection (NCS) in four equal-sided non-planar ring resonators (NPRO), β: folding angle, m₁ and m₂: spherical mirrors with radius of R₁ and R₂, m₃ and m₄: planar mirrors, A_j(j = 1,2,3,4): incident angles on four mirrors, P_j(j = 1,2,3,4): terminal points of the resonator, P_e, P_f, P_g, P_h, O₁, O₂: the midpoints of straight lines P₁P₂, P₂P₃, P₃P₄, P₄P₁, P₁P₃ and P₂P₄ separately, φ_tj(j = 1,2,3,4) and φ_j(j = 1,2,3,4): coordinate rotation angles based on TCS and NCS respectively, n_j(j = 1,2,3,4): the binormals at points P_j(j = 1,2,3,4), (x_tj, y_j, z_j) and (x_j, y_j, z_j)(j = 1,2,3,4): coordinate systems for the incident beam (based on TCS and NCS respectively) before being reflected from points P_j(j = 1,2,3,4), (x_tjr, y_jr, z_jr) and (x_jr, y_jr, z_jr)(j = 1,2,3,4): coordinate systems for the reflected beam (based on TCS and NCS respectively) after being reflected from points P_j(j = 1,2,3,4), δ_jz(j = 1,2,3,4): axial displacement of mirrors m_j(j = 1, 2, 3, 4), δ_jx, δ_jy(j = 1,2): radial displacements of the spherical mirrors m₁ and m₂. (Note: The positive directions of y_j and y_jr(j = 1,2,3,4) are along the directions of n_j(j = 1,2,3,4); the positive directions of z_j and z_jr(j = 1,2,3,4,b,c) are along the direction of beam propagation; (x_t1, x_t1r, x₁, x_1r), (x_t2, x_t2r, x₂, x_2r), (x_t3, x_t3r, x₃, x_3r) and (x_t4, x_t4r, x₄, x_4r) are located at the incident planes of P₄P₁P₂, P₁P₂P₃, P₂P₃P₄ and P₃P₄P₁ separately; the positive directions of δ_1x, δ_2x, δ_1z, δ_2z, δ_3z and δ_4z are along the directions of straight lines P₂P₄, P₁P₃, P₁O₂, P₂O₁, P₃O₂ and P₄O₁ separately; the positive direction of δ_jy (j = 1,2) is along the direction of n_j(j = 1,2).)

The positive orientations of δ_jz(j = 1,2,3,4), δ_jx(j = 1,2) and δ_jy(j = 1,2) are shown in Fig. 2 and these orientations are their translational axes respectively. The definitions of δ_jz(j = 1,2,3,4), δ_jx(j = 1,2) and δ_jy(j = 1,2) are similar to those in Fig. 1 of Ref. [10

]. The sign of δ_jz(j = 1,2,3,4) in M(m_j) is dependent on the detailed coordinate system and a reflection on mirrors m₁, m₂, m₃ and m₄ can be written as [10

]

M (m_{1}) = [\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 δ_{1 z} \cdot \sin (A) \\ - \frac{2}{R \cdot \cos (A)} & 1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{- 2 δ_{1 z} \cdot \tan (A)}{R} + \frac{2 δ_{1 x}}{R} \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - \frac{2 \times \cos (A)}{R} & 1 & \frac{2 δ_{1 y}}{R} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}],

(4)

M (m_{2}) = [\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - 2 δ_{2 z} \cdot \sin (A) \\ - \frac{2}{R \cdot \cos (A)} & 1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{2 δ_{2 z} \cdot \tan (A)}{R} + \frac{2 δ_{2 x}}{R} \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - \frac{2 \times \cos (A)}{R} & 1 & \frac{2 δ_{2 y}}{R} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}],

(5)

M (m_{3}) = [\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 δ_{3 z} \cdot \sin (A) \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}],

(6)

and

M (m_{4}) = [\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - 2 δ_{4 z} \cdot \sin (A) \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}] .

(7)

Coordinate rotation matrix can be found in textbook on lasers [3

A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science, 1986).

] and R(φ_j) is

R (φ_{j}) = [\begin{matrix} \cos (φ_{j}) & 0 & \sin (φ_{j}) & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \cos (φ_{j}) & 0 & \sin (φ_{j}) & 0 \\ - \sin (φ_{j}) & 0 & \cos (φ_{j}) & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & - \sin (φ_{j}) & 0 & \cos (φ_{j}) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix}]

(8)

As shown in Fig. 2, the detailed coordinate systems (based on TCS and NCS) and related coordinate rotations in NPRO have been illustrated. For every optical reflecting element (such as m₂ and m₃), its coordinate systems are composed of the coordinate system of incident beam and the coordinate system of reflected beam. That is to say, every optical reflecting element has two coordinate systems for the incident beam and the reflected beam respectively, and it is not to say that there exists only one coordinate system on every side of the beam path. When a beam propagates from one optical element to another, a coordinate transformation is needed to make the coordinate system of the reflected beam (after being reflected from previous optical element) consistent with the coordinate system of the incident beam (before being reflected from the next optical element).

The beam propagates along each leg in the clockwise direction as P₁→P₄→P₃→P₂→P₁. A coordinate transformation is needed when the beam propagates from one optical element to another. Before the incident beam is reflected from mirror m₁, the initial coordinate systems (x_t2r, y_2r, z_2r) based on TCS and (x_2r, y_2r, z_2r) based on NCS should be rotated into (x_t1, y₁, z₁) with the angle of φ_t1<0 and into (x₁, y₁, z₁) with the angle of φ₁<0 respectively, and it is the first coordinate rotation. Then the beam is reflected from m₁ and meanwhile, the coordinate systems have become (x_t1r, y_1r, z_1r) and (x_1r, y_1r, z_1r) which are based on TCS and NCS separately. The beam is followed by free-space propagation L₁. Before the incident beam is reflected from mirror m₄, the coordinate systems (x_t1r, y_1r, z_1r) based on TCS and (x_1r, y_1r, z_1r) based on NCS should be rotated into (x_t4, y₄, z₄) with the angle of φ_t4>0 and into (x₄, y₄, z₄) with the angle of φ₄<0 respectively, and it is the second coordinate rotation. Then the beam is reflected from m₄ and meanwhile, the coordinate systems have become (x_t4r, y_4r, z_4r) based on TCS and (x_4r, y_4r, z_4r) based on NCS separately. The beam is followed by free-space propagation L₄. Before the incident beam is reflected from mirror m₃, the coordinate systems (x_t4r, y_4r, z_4r) based on TCS and (x_4r, y_4r, z_4r) based on NCS should be rotated into (x_t3, y₃, z₃) with the angle of φ_t3<0 and into (x₃, y₃, z₃) with the angle of φ₃<0 respectively, and it is the third coordinate rotation. Then the beam is reflected from m₃ and meanwhile, the coordinate systems have become (x_t3r, y_3r, z_3r) based on TCS and (x_3r, y_3r, z_3r) based on NCS separately. The beam is followed by free-space propagation L₃. Finally, before the incident beam is reflected from mirror m₂, the coordinate systems (x_t3r, y_3r, z_3r) based on TCS and (x_3r, y_3r, z_3r) based on NCS should be rotated into (x_t2, y₂, z₂) with the angle of φ_t2>0 and into (x₂, y₂, z₂) with the angle of φ₂<0 respectively, and it is the fourth coordinate rotation. Then the beam is reflected from m₂ and meanwhile, the coordinate systems have become (x_t2r, y_2r, z_2r—the initial coordinate system based on TCS) and (x_2r, y_2r, z_2r—the initial coordinate system based on NCS) separately, and then the beam is followed by free-space propagation L₂. The coordinate rotation angles have the following relationships

φ_{t 1} = - φ_{t 2} = φ_{t 3} = - φ_{t 4} = - φ,

(9)

φ_{1} = φ_{2} = φ_{3} = φ_{4} = - φ .

(10)

where φ is the absolute value of φ_j(j = 1,2,3,4). The problem existed in utilzing TCS has been pointed out in Ref. [9

J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett. 37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Coordinate rotation of φ_{t j}(j = 1,2,3,4) and Eq. (9) is incorrect because it is based on incorrect TCS.

The relationship between A and φ is

\sin {(A)}^{2} = \frac{\cos (φ)}{1 + \cos (φ)} .

(11)

The relation between incident angle A and the coordinate rotation angle φ is shown in Eq. (11) and it is illustrated in Fig. 3. It is easy to find out that the larger the coordinate rotation angle φ, the smaller the incident angle A. By utilizing Eq. (11), the corresponding total image rotation angle ρ varies from 0° to 360° and the incident angle varies from 45° to 0° when the coordinate rotation angle varies from 0° to 90°.

Fig. 3 Incident angle A versus coordinate rotation angle φ

It would be better that image rotation in Ref. [5

H. Statz, T. A. Dorschner, M. Holtz, and I. W. Smith, “The multioscillator ring laser gyroscope,” in Laser Handbook, M. I. Stitch, and M. Bass, eds. 4, Chap. 3, 229–327, (North-Holland, 1985).

] is called beam rotation and its value is equal to the value of total coordinate rotation angle ρ. ρ can be written as

ρ = | φ_{1} | + | φ_{2} | + | φ_{3} | + | φ_{4} | = 4 φ

(12)

The initial position is point P₁ and the round trip matrix can be written as

M = R (φ_{1}) M (m_{1}) T (L_{1}) R (φ_{4}) M (m_{4}) T (L_{4}) R (φ_{3}) M (m_{3}) T (L_{3}) R (φ_{2}) M (m_{2}) T (L_{2})

(13)

The resonator optical-axis that is invariant under the round-trip propagation coincides with the eigenvector of M with eigenvalue 1:

(\begin{matrix} r_{x} \\ r_{x}' \\ r_{y} \\ r_{y}' \\ 1 \end{matrix}) = M (\begin{matrix} r_{x} \\ r_{x}' \\ r_{y} \\ r_{y}' \\ 1 \end{matrix}) .

(14)

where r_x and r_y are the ray heights from the reference axis along the x and y axes respectively and they are called optical-axis decentration in this article. r_x′ and r_y′ are the angles that the ray make with the reference axes in the x and y plane(which are vertical to axis y and axis x separately) respectively and they are called optical-axis tilt. The impact of the perturbation sources δ_jz(j = 1,2,3,4), δ_jx(j = 1,2) and δ_jy(j = 1,2) on optical-axis perturbation can be obtained by solving Eq. (14).

3. Analysis results of the generalized sensitivity factors

With reference to the definitions of SD1, ST1, SD2 and ST2 in Ref. [8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 shows the results of (SD1, ST1) and (SD2, ST2) respectively (versus L/R with A = 43.866° (ρ = 90°). φ₁ = φ₂ = φ₃ = φ₄ = φ = 22.5° and ρ = φ₁ + φ₂ + φ₃ + φ₄ = 90°). It can be seen that both the SD1 and ST1 caused by the angular misalignments of mirror m₁ have four common singular points at L/R = 0.403, L/R = 0.774, L/R = 3.447 and L/R = 6.619, where the optical-axis movements diverge. SD2 and ST2 caused by the translational displacements of mirror m₁ have the same four common singular points as mentioned above. The values of the sensitivity factors approach infinite at these singular points and the absolute value of the sensitivity factors increase sharply when L/R approaches the singular points. SD1, ST1, SD2 and ST2 caused by the misalignments of other mirrors have also been studied and it is found that they have the same singular points as discussed above. Similarly, it has been identified that the singular points are located at L/R = 1.075, L/R = 1.531, L/R = 3.484 and L/R = 4.960, when A = 40.060° (ρ = 180°), while the singular points are located at L/R = 0.543, L/R = 0.556, L/R = 4.799 and L/R = 4.909, when A = 31.742° (ρ = 270°). It has also been identified that the singular points are located at L/R = 0, L/R = 3.771 and L/R = 7.543, when A = 45° (ρ = 0°) which is corresponding to a square planar ring resonator.

Fig. 4 Sensitivity factors SD1 and ST1 characterizing the movement of the optical-axis on mirror m₁ with A = 43.866°. The perturbation source is the angular misalignments of mirror m₁.

Fig. 5 Sensitivity factors SD2 and ST2 characterizing the movement of the optical-axis on mirror m₁ with A = 43.866°. The perturbation source is the translational displacements of mirror m₁.

Defining the 4 × 4 matrix on the left side of Eq. (6) in Ref. [8

D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] as M', we can obtain the determinant of M' (det M') versus L/R as shown in Fig. 6. Compared with the singular points mentioned above, it can be seen that the location of the singular points overlap with the zero value point of det M'. As we know, det M' can be expressed by L/R and A, therefore, the equation of det M' = 0 can be solved and L/R can be expressed in terms of A (here the expression is named as f(A) and f(A) is the function of the zero points in det M'). After the sensitivity factors are expressed in terms of L/R and A, it is found that the left (right) limit of the sensitivity factors approaches plus (minus) or minus (plus) infinity when L/R is close to f(A), and the zero points in det M' are just the singular points of the sensitivity factors. It is an easier way to find the accurate location of the singular points by calculating the determinant of M' rather than the traditional way.

Fig. 6 Determinant of M' versues L/R.

A stable nonplanar ring resonator (of which the beam size is finite) has effective modes. By utilizing the matrix method of generalized Gaussian beams, we obtain the stability map of the resonator as shown in Fig. 7. The detailed stability map with ρ ranging from 0°to 360°is shown in Fig. 7(a) and Fig. 7(b). The detailed stability map with A ranging from 0°to 45°is shown in Fig. 7(c) and Fig. 7(d). In region 0, the resonator is stable, with (in general) elliptical isophotes. In region 1, the major axis of the isophotes ellipse is infinite, and in region 2 both axes are infinite. As mentioned above, L/R can be expressed in terms of A (or φ) after the equation of det M' = 0 is solved. Then the accurate location of the singular points can be found out in NPRO with different incident angle A. The unsuitable tracks of the singular points of a NPRO are shown in Fig. 7(a), Fig. 7(b), Fig. 7(c) and Fig. 7(d) with red marked lines.

Fig. 7 Stability map of NPRO and the track of the singular points under the condition of (a) ρ ranging from 0°to 360°and L/R ranging from 0 to 2, (b) ρ ranging from 0°to 360°and L/R ranging from 2 to 8, (c) A ranging from 0°to 45°and L/R ranging from 0 to 2, (d) A ranging from 0°to 45°and L/R ranging from 2 to 8. (Note: the stable and unstable regions are separated with solid lines; the tracks of the singular points are illustrated with the red marked lines)

4. Conclusion

In summary, by utilizing the novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection, the generalized sensitivity factors SD1, ST1, SD2 and ST2 influenced by both the radial and axial displacements of a spherical mirror in a nonplanar ring resonator have been obtained. Besides, the singular points of different kinds of NPRO under the conditions of incident angle A ranging from 0° to 45° or total coordinate rotation angle ρ ranging from 0°to 360°have also been obtained through the analysis of the determinant of the coefficient matrix of the linear equations. The analysis in this paper is important to the cavity design of NPRO and it could be helpful to avoid the violent movement of the optical-axis to small misalignment of the mirrors in NPRO.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under grant 61078017.

References and links

1.	W. W. Chow, J. Gea-Banacloche, L. M. Pedrotti, V. E. Sanders, W. Schleich, and M. O. Scully, “The ring laser gyro,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(1), 61–104 (1985). [CrossRef]
2.	A. E. Siegman, “Laser beams and resonators: beyond the 1960s,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6(6), 1389–1399 (2000). [CrossRef]
3.	A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science, 1986).
4.	G. A. Massey and A. E. Siegman, “Reflection and refraction of Gaussian light beams at tilted ellipsoidal surfaces,” Appl. Opt. 8(5), 975–978 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.	H. Statz, T. A. Dorschner, M. Holtz, and I. W. Smith, “The multioscillator ring laser gyroscope,” in Laser Handbook, M. I. Stitch, and M. Bass, eds. 4, Chap. 3, 229–327, (North-Holland, 1985).
6.	S.-C. Sheng, “Optical-axis perturbation singularity in an out-of-plane ring resonator,” Opt. Lett. 19(10), 683–685 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.	J. Yuan and X. W. Long, “Optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Commun. 281(5), 1204–1210 (2008). [CrossRef]
8.	D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett. 37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.	J. Yuan, X. W. Long, and M. X. Chen, “Generalized ray matrix for spherical mirror reflection and its application in square ring resonators and monolithic triaxial ring resonators,” Opt. Express 19(7), 6762–6776 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.	J. Yuan, X. Long, L. Liang, B. Zhang, F. Wang, and H. Zhao, “Nonplanar ring resonator modes: generalized Gaussian beams,” Appl. Opt. 46(15), 2980–2989 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.	G. J. Martin, “Multioscillator ring laser gyro using compensated optical wedge,” U.S. patent 5,907,402 (25 May 1999).
13.	J. Yuan, X. W. Long, B. Zhang, F. Wang, and H. C. Zhao, “Optical axis perturbation in folded planar ring resonators,” Appl. Opt. 46(25), 6314–6322 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	A. H. Paxton and W. P. Latham Jr., “Unstable resonators with 90 ° beam rotation,” Appl. Opt. 25(17), 2939–2946 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.	J. Yuan, X. W. Long, and L. M. Liang, “Optical-axis perturbation in triaxial ring resonator,” Appl. Opt. 47(5), 628–631 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.	X. W. Long and J. Yuan, “Method for eliminating mismatching error in monolithic triaxial ring resonators,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 8(12), 1135–1138 (2010). [CrossRef]
17.	Y. X. Zhao, M. G. Sceats, and A. D. Stokes, “Application of ray tracing to the design of a monolithic nonplanar ring laser,” Appl. Opt. 30(36), 5235–5238 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18.	H. T. Tuan and S. L. Huang, “Analysis of reentrant two-mirror nonplanar ring laser cavity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22(11), 2476–2482 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.	S. Gangopadhyay and S. Sarkar, “ABCD matrix for reflection and refraction of Gaussian light beams at surfaces of hyperboloid of revolution and efficiency computation for laser diode to single-mode fiber coupling by way of a hyperbolic lens on the fiber tip,” Appl. Opt. 36(33), 8582–8586 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20.	H. Z. Liu, L. R. Liu, R. W. Xu, and Z. Luan, “ABCD matrix for reflection and refraction of Gaussian beams at the surface of a parabola of revolution,” Appl. Opt. 44(23), 4809–4813 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(070.2590) Fourier optics and signal processing : ABCD transforms
(080.2730) Geometric optics : Matrix methods in paraxial optics
(140.3370) Lasers and laser optics : Laser gyroscopes
(140.3410) Lasers and laser optics : Laser resonators
(140.4780) Lasers and laser optics : Optical resonators

ToC Category:
Lasers and Laser Optics

History
Original Manuscript: May 7, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: January 3, 2013
Published: January 23, 2013

Citation
Jie Yuan, Meixiong Chen, Yingying Li, Zhongqi Tan, and Zhiguo Wang, "Reanalysis of generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators," Opt. Express 21, 2297-2306 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-2-2297

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

W. W. Chow, J. Gea-Banacloche, L. M. Pedrotti, V. E. Sanders, W. Schleich, and M. O. Scully, “The ring laser gyro,” Rev. Mod. Phys.57(1), 61–104 (1985). [CrossRef]
A. E. Siegman, “Laser beams and resonators: beyond the 1960s,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.6(6), 1389–1399 (2000). [CrossRef]
A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science, 1986).
G. A. Massey and A. E. Siegman, “Reflection and refraction of Gaussian light beams at tilted ellipsoidal surfaces,” Appl. Opt.8(5), 975–978 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
H. Statz, T. A. Dorschner, M. Holtz, and I. W. Smith, “The multioscillator ring laser gyroscope,” in Laser Handbook, M. I. Stitch, and M. Bass, eds. 4, Chap. 3, 229–327, (North-Holland, 1985).
S.-C. Sheng, “Optical-axis perturbation singularity in an out-of-plane ring resonator,” Opt. Lett.19(10), 683–685 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Yuan and X. W. Long, “Optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Commun.281(5), 1204–1210 (2008). [CrossRef]
D. D. Wen, D. Li, and J. L. Zhao, “Generalized sensitivity factors for optical-axis perturbation in nonplanar ring resonators,” Opt. Express19(20), 19752–19757 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Yuan, M. Chen, Z. Kang, and X. Long, “Novel coordinate system for Gaussian beam reflection,” Opt. Lett.37(11), 2082–2084 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Yuan, X. W. Long, and M. X. Chen, “Generalized ray matrix for spherical mirror reflection and its application in square ring resonators and monolithic triaxial ring resonators,” Opt. Express19(7), 6762–6776 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Yuan, X. Long, L. Liang, B. Zhang, F. Wang, and H. Zhao, “Nonplanar ring resonator modes: generalized Gaussian beams,” Appl. Opt.46(15), 2980–2989 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
G. J. Martin, “Multioscillator ring laser gyro using compensated optical wedge,” U.S. patent 5,907,402 (25 May 1999).
J. Yuan, X. W. Long, B. Zhang, F. Wang, and H. C. Zhao, “Optical axis perturbation in folded planar ring resonators,” Appl. Opt.46(25), 6314–6322 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. H. Paxton and W. P. Latham., “Unstable resonators with 90 ° beam rotation,” Appl. Opt.25(17), 2939–2946 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Yuan, X. W. Long, and L. M. Liang, “Optical-axis perturbation in triaxial ring resonator,” Appl. Opt.47(5), 628–631 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
X. W. Long and J. Yuan, “Method for eliminating mismatching error in monolithic triaxial ring resonators,” Chin. Opt. Lett.8(12), 1135–1138 (2010). [CrossRef]
Y. X. Zhao, M. G. Sceats, and A. D. Stokes, “Application of ray tracing to the design of a monolithic nonplanar ring laser,” Appl. Opt.30(36), 5235–5238 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
H. T. Tuan and S. L. Huang, “Analysis of reentrant two-mirror nonplanar ring laser cavity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A22(11), 2476–2482 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
S. Gangopadhyay and S. Sarkar, “ABCD matrix for reflection and refraction of Gaussian light beams at surfaces of hyperboloid of revolution and efficiency computation for laser diode to single-mode fiber coupling by way of a hyperbolic lens on the fiber tip,” Appl. Opt.36(33), 8582–8586 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
H. Z. Liu, L. R. Liu, R. W. Xu, and Z. Luan, “ABCD matrix for reflection and refraction of Gaussian beams at the surface of a parabola of revolution,” Appl. Opt.44(23), 4809–4813 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper