OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 21 — Oct. 21, 2013
  • pp: 25324–25332
« Show journal navigation

Investigation of local strain distribution and linear electro-optic effect in strained silicon waveguides

Bartos Chmielak, Christopher Matheisen, Christian Ripperda, Jens Bolten, Thorsten Wahlbrink, Michael Waldow, and Heinrich Kurz  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 21, pp. 25324-25332 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.025324


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2366 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present detailed investigations of the local strain distribution and the induced second-order optical nonlinearity within strained silicon waveguides cladded with a Si3N4 strain layer. Micro-Raman Spectroscopy mappings and electro-optic characterization of waveguides with varying width wWG show that strain gradients in the waveguide core and the effective second-order susceptibility χ(2)yyz increase with reduced wWG. For 300 nm wide waveguides a mean effective χ(2)yyz of 190 pm/V is achieved, which is the highest value reported for silicon so far. To gain more insight into the origin of the extraordinary large optical second-order nonlinearity of strained silicon waveguides numerical simulations of edge induced strain gradients in these structures are presented and discussed.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Recently, the induction of second-order nonlinear optical effects in silicon nanophotonic structures has gained considerable interest for a wide field of applications [1

1. C. Schriever, C. Bohley, J. Schilling, and R. B. Wehrspohn, “Strained silicon photonics,” Materials 5(12), 889–908 (2012). [CrossRef]

14

14. B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 19(18), 17212–17219 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Due to the inherent absence of a second-order susceptibility in silicon, resulting from its centro-symmetric crystal structure, different approaches of functionalizing silicon waveguides have been theoretically and experimentally investigated. For example filling silicon slot waveguides with nonlinear optic polymers for high-speed electro-optic modulators [2

2. J. H. Wülbern, S. Prorok, J. Hampe, A. Petrov, M. Eich, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, M. Jenett, and A. Jacob, “40 GHz electro-optic modulation in hybrid silicon-organic slotted photonic crystal waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 35(16), 2753–2755 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5

5. R. Palmer, L. Alloatti, D. Korn, P. C. Schindler, R. Schmogrow, M. Baier, S. Koenig, D. Hillerkuss, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Waldow, R. Dinu, W. Freude, C. Koos, and J. Leuthold, “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulator generating up to 84 Gbit/s BPSK and M-ASK signals,“ in Optical Fiber Communication Conference/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, OW4J.6 (2013). [CrossRef]

] or modifying the silicon surface with HBr chemistry for terahertz emitters [6

6. M. Wächter, C. Matheisen, M. Waldow, T. Wahlbrink, J. Bolten, M. Nagel, and H. Kurz, “Optical generation of terahertz and second-harmonic light in plasma-activated silicon nanophotonic structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(16), 161107 (2010). [CrossRef]

] are efficient methods to create useable second-order nonlinear optical effects in silicon structures. Another prominent way is to induce asymmetric mechanical strain inside silicon waveguides by means of a silicon nitride (Si3N4) strain layer. This concept was first presented by Jacobsen et al [7

7. R. S. Jacobsen, K. N. Andersen, P. I. Borel, J. Fage-Pedersen, L. H. Frandsen, O. Hansen, M. Kristensen, A. V. Lavrinenko, G. Moulin, H. Ou, C. Peucheret, B. Zsigri, and A. Bjarklev, “Strained silicon as a new electro-optic material,” Nature 441(7090), 199–202 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and Fage-Pedersen et al [8

8. J. Fage-Pedersen, L. H. Frandsen, A. V. Lavrinenko, and P. I. Borel, “A linear electro-optic effect in silicon, induced by use of strain,” in 3rd IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 37–39 (2006).

] in 2006. Thereafter several groups gave attention to this approach [9

9. N. K. Hon, K. K. Tsia, D. R. Solli, B. Jalali, and J. B. Khurgin, “Stress-induced χ(2) in silicon – comparison between theoretical and experimental values,” in 6th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 232–234 (2009).

13

13. F. Bianco, K. Fedus, F. Enrichi, R. Pierobon, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, “Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping of stress and strain distributions in strained silicon waveguides,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27(8), 085009 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. Recently Avrutsky and Soref [11

11. I. Avrutsky and R. Soref, “Phase-matched sum frequency generation in strained silicon waveguides using their second-order nonlinear optical susceptibility,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21707–21716 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] presented a theoretical study on phase-matched second harmonic generation (SHG) in strained silicon waveguides with a Si3N4 strain layer. Furthermore, Cazzanelli et al [12

12. M. Cazzanelli, F. Bianco, E. Borga, G. Pucker, M. Ghulinyan, E. Degoli, E. Luppi, V. Véniard, S. Ossicini, D. Modotto, S. Wabnitz, R. Pierobon, and L. Pavesi, “Second-harmonic generation in silicon waveguides strained by silicon nitride,” Nat. Mater. 11(2), 148–154 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] realized SHG in Si3N4 cladded multi-mode waveguides, however, without demonstrating phase matching. Also Bianco et al [13

13. F. Bianco, K. Fedus, F. Enrichi, R. Pierobon, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, “Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping of stress and strain distributions in strained silicon waveguides,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27(8), 085009 (2012). [CrossRef]

] investigated the stress and strain distributions in these waveguides using micro-Raman mappings conducted on the waveguide facet.

To make the concept of the strained silicon waveguide competitive with the established LiNbO3 modulator technology further improvement of the structure is necessary. In particular the reduction of Vπ L ≈110 Vcm (55 Vcm using electrodes in push-pull configuration [14

14. B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 19(18), 17212–17219 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]) to a value that can be supplied by state-of-the-art high-speed drivers at reasonable length is essential. To accomplish this, two approaches are viable: First, the efficiency of the field coupling could be improved by optimizing the electrode design so that for a given modulation voltage the induced electric field inside the waveguide is increased. Second, the effective χ(2)yyz of the waveguide could be enhanced by optimizing the strain profiles within the structure. For this a fundamental understanding of the strain generation is critical.

In this work we investigate the influence of the waveguide geometry, especially the waveguide width wWG, on the strain distribution and the effective χ(2)yyz in strained silicon rib waveguides. Spatially resolved Micro-Raman Spectroscopy (MRS) mappings conducted across waveguides with different wWG reveal large strain gradients in the vicinity of the waveguide sidewalls. Electro-optic characterization of Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) based modulators with varying wWG show a strong impact of wWG on the effective χ(2)yyz. In complementary numerical simulations the conditions for edge induced strain gradients are investigated.

2. Experiments and results

2.1 Spatially resolved Raman mappings

The first experimental investigation focuses on the analysis of the local strain distribution inside strained silicon waveguides with different wWG as the asymmetric distortion of the silicon lattice is responsible for the generation of the χ(2) in silicon. To get information about the strain distribution MRS line scans were conducted across different waveguides in y-direction. At each measuring point the exact spectral position and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the silicon Raman peak close to ωc = 520.5 cm−1 is analyzed. Deviations in the spectral position of the silicon Raman peak Δω reveal the type of predominant strain in the probed volume while an increase of the FWHM is interpreted as inhomogeneity, i.e. gradient in the strain distribution [15

15. I. DeWolf, “Micro-raman spectroscopy to study local mechanical stress in silicon integrated circuits,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 11(2), 139–154 (1996). [CrossRef]

]. Before and after each line scan the spectrum of a bulk silicon reference sample is measured and only the relative Raman shift Δω is considered. Thereby any influence of the calibration of the Raman Spectrometer is eliminated. The spatial resolution of the setup is given by the diameter of the gaussian-shaped laser spot which is approximately 800 nm (1/e). Together with a step size of 100 nm this results in a spatial overlap of the probed material volume for adjacent measuring points.
Fig. 2 MRS mappings conducted on 2 μm (a) and 500 nm (b) wide strained waveguides (solid lines) and unstrained reference waveguides (dotted lines). In the upper part (black lines) the relative Raman shift Δω is shown. The lower part (blue lines) contains the corresponding FWHM of the Raman peak. The red dashed lines mark the position of the waveguide edges.
Figure 2 displays MRS line scans measured on 2 μm and 500 nm wide waveguides including the relative Raman shift (black lines) and the FWHM of the silicon peak (blue line) on strained waveguides (solid line) and equivalent unstrained waveguides without Si3N4 layer (dotted line). The measurements on the reference waveguides show typical values for unstrained silicon (Δω ≈0, FWHM ≈3 cm−1) at the waveguide core and slight compressive strain in the slab region that originates from the Si/SiO2 interface. In case of the strained waveguides the Raman shift close to the waveguide sidewalls considerably changes its sign. Consequently the type of the predominant strain changes from compressive (positive Δω) to tensile (negative Δω) back to compressive. As can be seen from the FWHM this asymmetric strain profile is reflected in a prominent broadening of the Raman peak at the edges of the waveguides. Hence, the highest second-order nonlinearity is expected to be located in these regions.

2.2 Electro-optic characterization

The electro-optic characterization is performed by measuring the spectral transfer functions (STF) of different MZI modulator devices in TE polarization at the C-band wavelength window under varied modulation voltages [14

14. B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 19(18), 17212–17219 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. From the STF the induced phase shift and thus the change of the effective waveguide index Δneff is extracted. Taking into account the specific confinement factor for high-index-contrast waveguides [16

16. J. T. Robinson, K. Preston, O. Painter, and M. Lipson, “First-principle derivation of gain in high-index-contrast waveguides,” Opt. Express 16(21), 16659–16669 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] the index change ΔnSi of the silicon part of the waveguide structure is calculated. The electric modulation field EMod inside the silicon waveguide is determined using numerical simulation. Finally the effective second order susceptibility of the silicon part of the waveguide structure χ(2)yyz = nSi·ΔnSi/EMod is calculated. In our evaluation of the χ(2) the measured phase shift is fully attributed to the strain induced Pockels effect inside the silicon waveguides and as in [14

14. B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 19(18), 17212–17219 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] parasitic carrier-based effects are neglected. Even though no detectable current (I < 1 nA) is observed during the measurements and the number of residual charges due to a background doping of 1·1015/cm3 is low possible carrier-based contributions to the observed phase shift are subject to further investigations.

The investigated modulators are identical except for the waveguide width wWG below the electrodes. The center electrode has a width of 70 µm while the side electrodes are 150 µm wide. Electrodes are spaced by 50 µm and have a length of 1.73 cm or 0.76 cm. The insertion loss of the modulators ranges from 43 dB to 38 dB.

2.3 Simulation of strain profiles

In addition to the mapping of Raman and electro-optic responses numerical process simulations were performed to obtain information on the strain distribution within the strained silicon waveguides. The strain profiles after processing are simulated using the Sentaurus Process tool by Synopsys. The quasi-static equations of force equilibrium are solved to calculate the stress and strain profile within the structure. The simulated volume has been chosen large enough so that the impact of the Dirichlet boundary conditions on the calculated stress can be neglected. Si3N4 is treated as a purely viscous material while silicon is assumed to be elastic. As the viscosity of Si3N4 depends on the temperature the thermal history is important for the calculation of the stress and strain profiles. It is also crucial for a realistic simulation to take into account the temperature dependence of the expansion coefficients for both Si3N4 and silicon. Here we use values reported in the literature [18

18. M. Maeda and K. Ikeda, “Stress evaluation of radio-frequency-biased plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon nitride films,” J. Appl. Phys. 83(7), 3865 (1998). [CrossRef]

].

Fig. 4 (a) SEM cross-section image of a rib waveguide with a Si3N4 strain layer. (b) 2D-Model of the waveguide structure.
The actual growth process of the Si3N4 layer is not simulated. Instead a 2D scale model (Fig. 4(b)) of the waveguide cross section is created based on scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the real structure (Fig. 4(a)). With this model the temporal evolution of the temperature within the waveguide structure during the rapid thermal annealing step is calculated. In particular the quench from maximum temperature (1050° C) to room temperature is taken into account. Another relevant factor for the simulation is the initial stress that is induced during the Si3N4 deposition before the annealing step. From earlier Raman experiments we know that the Si3N4 covered silicon waveguides features tensile stress directly after deposition. To consider this we have introduced a complementary compressive stress in the Si3N4 layer with a magnitude of 1 GPa. The simulation result is a 2D strain profile of the waveguide in the y-z-plane.

For this study we focus on the strain component εyy because the gradient δεyyz generates a polarization in the silicon crystal that is aligned in z-direction [9

9. N. K. Hon, K. K. Tsia, D. R. Solli, B. Jalali, and J. B. Khurgin, “Stress-induced χ(2) in silicon – comparison between theoretical and experimental values,” in 6th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 232–234 (2009).

] parallel to the electric modulation field. Therefore we assume this gradient along the z-axis is the main origin of the χ(2)yyz in the strained silicon waveguides. Furthermore the strain component εyy is also probed in the MRS measurements. Figure 4(a) shows a cross-section SEM image of the investigated structure: a silicon rib waveguide cladded with a 350 nm thick Si3N4 strain layer. Due to the fact that a low temperature plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition process is used to deposit the Si3N4, layer growth takes place on all faces of the waveguide simultaneously. The resulting Si3N4 layer is therefore not planar but features pronounced gaps located close to the waveguide edges. These gaps strongly influence the formation of the strain profile within the silicon waveguide as they interrupt the Si3N4 layer and lead to a local strain relaxation. Thus this feature is also implemented in the simulation model shown in Fig. 4(b).
Fig. 5 Simulated strain distribution εyy for different waveguides structures. (a)-(c) Waveguides with different gaps in the Si3N4 layer. (d) and (e) Comparison of a 2 μm and a 400 nm wide waveguide.
Figure 5 displays multiple simulated strain profiles. In this graphic presentation blue colors indicate compressive strain while red colors indicate tensile strain in the crystal lattice ranging from εyy = −1⋅10−3 to + 1⋅10−2. To validate the simulations several parameter variations were carried out.

First the influence of the gap in the Si3N4 layer on the strain distribution is examined. As it is not possible to clearly identify the exact depth of the gap from the SEM image we have conducted strain simulations on identical silicon waveguides with different Si3N4 gaps. Three exemplary results of this investigation are shown in Figs. 5(a)-5(c). In case of a closed Si3N4 layer without a gap the strain distribution inside the silicon waveguide is nearly homogenous. This changes dramatically if a gap is included. Depending on the depth of the gap pronounced strain gradients with strong tensile and compressive components are induced in the vicinity of the vertical waveguide edges. The strain gradient is maximal if the gap reaches down to the silicon slab.

In a second investigation the waveguide width wWG was varied. Figures 5(d) and 5(e) show exemplary strain simulations of a 2 μm and a 400 nm wide waveguide with the gap reaching down to the silicon slab. The most significant difference between these structures is that the strain gradient δεyyz in the waveguide center (y = 0) is much stronger in the narrow waveguide. A numerical analysis of this characteristic is displayed in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6 Simulated strain component εyy in the center of the waveguide (y = 0) calculated for different wWG. The gradient of εyy increases for smaller wWG.
Here the strain component εyy is plotted along the z-axis (at y = 0) for different wWG ranging from 300 nm to 2 μm. It can be seen that εyy exhibits the steepest slope and therefore the strongest gradient |δεyyz| for the 300 nm wide waveguide. With increasing width |δεyyz| gradually decreases. At wWG = 2 μm still a gradient can be detected but it is comparatively small. This correlation is in good agreement with the Raman experiments and explains the observed increased Raman line broadening in the waveguide center of small waveguide structures. Furthermore, the simulations are consistent with the results of the electro-optic experiments. There a larger strain gradient in the center of smaller waveguides induces a higher electro-optic effect in the respective modulator devices.

3. Discussion

The presented results demonstrate that increasing the optical non-linearity of strained silicon waveguides is possible by optimizing the geometry of the waveguides. Similar implications can be derived from the work of Cazzanelli and Bianco [12

12. M. Cazzanelli, F. Bianco, E. Borga, G. Pucker, M. Ghulinyan, E. Degoli, E. Luppi, V. Véniard, S. Ossicini, D. Modotto, S. Wabnitz, R. Pierobon, and L. Pavesi, “Second-harmonic generation in silicon waveguides strained by silicon nitride,” Nat. Mater. 11(2), 148–154 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,13

13. F. Bianco, K. Fedus, F. Enrichi, R. Pierobon, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, “Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping of stress and strain distributions in strained silicon waveguides,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27(8), 085009 (2012). [CrossRef]

], who have measured spatially resolved strain profiles on the cross-section of large multi-mode waveguides and correlated them with χ(2) values obtained from SHG experiments. Interestingly, they found that the effective χ(2) is higher in larger waveguides. This discrepancy is probably caused by fundamental differences in the structures. The most obvious distinctive feature is that their Si3N4/SiNx straining layer is located exclusively on top of the waveguide. Therefore the strain originates solely from the upper interface of the waveguide. In our structures we found that the largest strain gradients are located at the vertical waveguide sidewalls that are in our case also covered with Si3N4. For the optimization of the effective χ(2) in our waveguides a smaller wWG is required to increase the relevant strain gradient |δεyyz| at the waveguide center (y = 0). On the contrary the strain profiles shown in [12

12. M. Cazzanelli, F. Bianco, E. Borga, G. Pucker, M. Ghulinyan, E. Degoli, E. Luppi, V. Véniard, S. Ossicini, D. Modotto, S. Wabnitz, R. Pierobon, and L. Pavesi, “Second-harmonic generation in silicon waveguides strained by silicon nitride,” Nat. Mater. 11(2), 148–154 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,13

13. F. Bianco, K. Fedus, F. Enrichi, R. Pierobon, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, “Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping of stress and strain distributions in strained silicon waveguides,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27(8), 085009 (2012). [CrossRef]

] do not show distinct maxima at the waveguide sidewalls. Obviously this can lead to a completely different waveguide width dependency of the strain gradients and consequently the effective χ(2).

An overall improvement regarding the modulation efficiency of strained silicon rib waveguides was achieved in this work by reducing wWG. As one way to further improve the applicability of strained silicon waveguides for an efficient modulator application more sophisticated changes in the waveguide structure like the use of asymmetric waveguide geometries are suggested.

4. Conclusion

In summary we have shown that the waveguide geometry in particular the width of the waveguide wWG has a strong influence on the induced strain asymmetry and the resulting effective χ(2)yyz in strained silicon waveguides. We have demonstrated a device with a new record of χ(2)yyz in strained silicon and have proven that by reducing wWG the strain gradient and therefore the effective χ(2)yyz can be significantly enhanced. In complementary process simulations we reproduced the strain distribution within the Si3N4 covered waveguides. In particular gaps in the Si3N4 layer allowing a local strain relaxation are identified as source for the large strain gradients close to the vertical waveguide edges. With specific waveguide structures exploiting these findings in a favorable way may open the road to challenge the well established LiNbO3 modulators.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the MISTRAL project (contract# 01BL0800).

References and links

1.

C. Schriever, C. Bohley, J. Schilling, and R. B. Wehrspohn, “Strained silicon photonics,” Materials 5(12), 889–908 (2012). [CrossRef]

2.

J. H. Wülbern, S. Prorok, J. Hampe, A. Petrov, M. Eich, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, M. Jenett, and A. Jacob, “40 GHz electro-optic modulation in hybrid silicon-organic slotted photonic crystal waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 35(16), 2753–2755 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

M. Gould, T. Baehr-Jones, R. Ding, S. Huang, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, J.-M. Fedeli, M. Fournier, and M. Hochberg, “Silicon-polymer hybrid slot waveguide ring-resonator modulator,” Opt. Express 19(5), 3952–3961 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

L. Alloatti, D. Korn, R. Palmer, D. Hillerkuss, J. Li, A. Barklund, R. Dinu, J. Wieland, M. Fournier, J. Fedeli, H. Yu, W. Bogaerts, P. Dumon, R. Baets, C. Koos, W. Freude, and J. Leuthold, “42.7 Gbit/s electro-optic modulator in silicon technology,” Opt. Express 19(12), 11841–11851 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

R. Palmer, L. Alloatti, D. Korn, P. C. Schindler, R. Schmogrow, M. Baier, S. Koenig, D. Hillerkuss, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Waldow, R. Dinu, W. Freude, C. Koos, and J. Leuthold, “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulator generating up to 84 Gbit/s BPSK and M-ASK signals,“ in Optical Fiber Communication Conference/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, OW4J.6 (2013). [CrossRef]

6.

M. Wächter, C. Matheisen, M. Waldow, T. Wahlbrink, J. Bolten, M. Nagel, and H. Kurz, “Optical generation of terahertz and second-harmonic light in plasma-activated silicon nanophotonic structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(16), 161107 (2010). [CrossRef]

7.

R. S. Jacobsen, K. N. Andersen, P. I. Borel, J. Fage-Pedersen, L. H. Frandsen, O. Hansen, M. Kristensen, A. V. Lavrinenko, G. Moulin, H. Ou, C. Peucheret, B. Zsigri, and A. Bjarklev, “Strained silicon as a new electro-optic material,” Nature 441(7090), 199–202 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

J. Fage-Pedersen, L. H. Frandsen, A. V. Lavrinenko, and P. I. Borel, “A linear electro-optic effect in silicon, induced by use of strain,” in 3rd IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 37–39 (2006).

9.

N. K. Hon, K. K. Tsia, D. R. Solli, B. Jalali, and J. B. Khurgin, “Stress-induced χ(2) in silicon – comparison between theoretical and experimental values,” in 6th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 232–234 (2009).

10.

N. K. Hon, K. K. Tsia, D. R. Solli, and B. Jalali, “Periodically-Poled Silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(9), 091116 (2009). [CrossRef]

11.

I. Avrutsky and R. Soref, “Phase-matched sum frequency generation in strained silicon waveguides using their second-order nonlinear optical susceptibility,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21707–21716 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

M. Cazzanelli, F. Bianco, E. Borga, G. Pucker, M. Ghulinyan, E. Degoli, E. Luppi, V. Véniard, S. Ossicini, D. Modotto, S. Wabnitz, R. Pierobon, and L. Pavesi, “Second-harmonic generation in silicon waveguides strained by silicon nitride,” Nat. Mater. 11(2), 148–154 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

F. Bianco, K. Fedus, F. Enrichi, R. Pierobon, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, “Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping of stress and strain distributions in strained silicon waveguides,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27(8), 085009 (2012). [CrossRef]

14.

B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express 19(18), 17212–17219 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

I. DeWolf, “Micro-raman spectroscopy to study local mechanical stress in silicon integrated circuits,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 11(2), 139–154 (1996). [CrossRef]

16.

J. T. Robinson, K. Preston, O. Painter, and M. Lipson, “First-principle derivation of gain in high-index-contrast waveguides,” Opt. Express 16(21), 16659–16669 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

G. L. Li and P. K. L. Yu, “Optical intensity modulators for digital and analog applications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 21(9), 2010–2030 (2003). [CrossRef]

18.

M. Maeda and K. Ikeda, “Stress evaluation of radio-frequency-biased plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon nitride films,” J. Appl. Phys. 83(7), 3865 (1998). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(130.0130) Integrated optics : Integrated optics
(160.2100) Materials : Electro-optical materials
(170.5660) Medical optics and biotechnology : Raman spectroscopy
(190.0190) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics
(250.7360) Optoelectronics : Waveguide modulators

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: August 20, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 7, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 8, 2013
Published: October 16, 2013

Citation
Bartos Chmielak, Christopher Matheisen, Christian Ripperda, Jens Bolten, Thorsten Wahlbrink, Michael Waldow, and Heinrich Kurz, "Investigation of local strain distribution and linear electro-optic effect in strained silicon waveguides," Opt. Express 21, 25324-25332 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-21-25324


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. C. Schriever, C. Bohley, J. Schilling, and R. B. Wehrspohn, “Strained silicon photonics,” Materials5(12), 889–908 (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. J. H. Wülbern, S. Prorok, J. Hampe, A. Petrov, M. Eich, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, M. Jenett, and A. Jacob, “40 GHz electro-optic modulation in hybrid silicon-organic slotted photonic crystal waveguides,” Opt. Lett.35(16), 2753–2755 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. Gould, T. Baehr-Jones, R. Ding, S. Huang, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, J.-M. Fedeli, M. Fournier, and M. Hochberg, “Silicon-polymer hybrid slot waveguide ring-resonator modulator,” Opt. Express19(5), 3952–3961 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. L. Alloatti, D. Korn, R. Palmer, D. Hillerkuss, J. Li, A. Barklund, R. Dinu, J. Wieland, M. Fournier, J. Fedeli, H. Yu, W. Bogaerts, P. Dumon, R. Baets, C. Koos, W. Freude, and J. Leuthold, “42.7 Gbit/s electro-optic modulator in silicon technology,” Opt. Express19(12), 11841–11851 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. R. Palmer, L. Alloatti, D. Korn, P. C. Schindler, R. Schmogrow, M. Baier, S. Koenig, D. Hillerkuss, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Waldow, R. Dinu, W. Freude, C. Koos, and J. Leuthold, “Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulator generating up to 84 Gbit/s BPSK and M-ASK signals,“ in Optical Fiber Communication Conference/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, OW4J.6 (2013). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Wächter, C. Matheisen, M. Waldow, T. Wahlbrink, J. Bolten, M. Nagel, and H. Kurz, “Optical generation of terahertz and second-harmonic light in plasma-activated silicon nanophotonic structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett.97(16), 161107 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. R. S. Jacobsen, K. N. Andersen, P. I. Borel, J. Fage-Pedersen, L. H. Frandsen, O. Hansen, M. Kristensen, A. V. Lavrinenko, G. Moulin, H. Ou, C. Peucheret, B. Zsigri, and A. Bjarklev, “Strained silicon as a new electro-optic material,” Nature441(7090), 199–202 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. Fage-Pedersen, L. H. Frandsen, A. V. Lavrinenko, and P. I. Borel, “A linear electro-optic effect in silicon, induced by use of strain,” in 3rd IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 37–39 (2006).
  9. N. K. Hon, K. K. Tsia, D. R. Solli, B. Jalali, and J. B. Khurgin, “Stress-induced χ(2) in silicon – comparison between theoretical and experimental values,” in 6th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics, 232–234 (2009).
  10. N. K. Hon, K. K. Tsia, D. R. Solli, and B. Jalali, “Periodically-Poled Silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett.94(9), 091116 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. I. Avrutsky and R. Soref, “Phase-matched sum frequency generation in strained silicon waveguides using their second-order nonlinear optical susceptibility,” Opt. Express19(22), 21707–21716 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. M. Cazzanelli, F. Bianco, E. Borga, G. Pucker, M. Ghulinyan, E. Degoli, E. Luppi, V. Véniard, S. Ossicini, D. Modotto, S. Wabnitz, R. Pierobon, and L. Pavesi, “Second-harmonic generation in silicon waveguides strained by silicon nitride,” Nat. Mater.11(2), 148–154 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. F. Bianco, K. Fedus, F. Enrichi, R. Pierobon, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, “Two-dimensional micro-Raman mapping of stress and strain distributions in strained silicon waveguides,” Semicond. Sci. Technol.27(8), 085009 (2012). [CrossRef]
  14. B. Chmielak, M. Waldow, C. Matheisen, C. Ripperda, J. Bolten, T. Wahlbrink, M. Nagel, F. Merget, and H. Kurz, “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Opt. Express19(18), 17212–17219 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. I. DeWolf, “Micro-raman spectroscopy to study local mechanical stress in silicon integrated circuits,” Semicond. Sci. Technol.11(2), 139–154 (1996). [CrossRef]
  16. J. T. Robinson, K. Preston, O. Painter, and M. Lipson, “First-principle derivation of gain in high-index-contrast waveguides,” Opt. Express16(21), 16659–16669 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. G. L. Li and P. K. L. Yu, “Optical intensity modulators for digital and analog applications,” J. Lightwave Technol.21(9), 2010–2030 (2003). [CrossRef]
  18. M. Maeda and K. Ikeda, “Stress evaluation of radio-frequency-biased plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon nitride films,” J. Appl. Phys.83(7), 3865 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited