OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 22 — Nov. 4, 2013
  • pp: 27286–27290
« Show journal navigation

Focus issue on surface plasmon photonics introduction

Pierre Berini, Alexandre Bouhelier, Javier Garcia de Abajo, and Namkyoo Park  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 22, pp. 27286-27290 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.027286


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (716 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The 6th International Conference on Surface Plasmon Photonics (SPP6) was held in Ottawa, Canada from May 26th to 31st, 2013. This independent series of biennial conferences is widely regarded as the premier series in the field, and the 6th edition maintained the tradition of excellence. This Focus Issue collects several papers related to research presented at SPP6, and although the number of papers it comprises is small compared to the total number of papers presented at the conference, the issue is representative and provides a good snapshot of the field at this point in time.

© 2013 OSA

Introduction to the focus issue on surface plasmon photonics

Surface plasmon photonics is a rapidly growing and evolving field on the cutting edge of optical science and engineering. The field is concerned with the interaction of light on metallic structures, from THz to UV wavelengths, and is driven by interests in fundamental questions and in applications such as biosensors for health care, light concentration for solar energy, devices for telecommunications, and near-field instrumentation for performing state-of-the-art research.

The drive for engineering ultimate field enhancement and confinement has recently entered a new realm as optical feed gaps are now routinely reaching sub-nanometer dimensions. In this interaction regime, the classical description of the plasmonic response based on Maxwell’s equations fails to capture the underlying physics. In their approach Teperik and associates used a full quantum mechanical approach to take into account electron tunneling to appropriately predict the optical response of two strongly coupled nanowires [3

3. T. V. Teperik, P. Nordlander, J. Aizpurua, and A. G. Borisov, “Quantum effects and nonlocality in strongly coupled plasmonic nanowire dimers,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27306– 27325 (2013).

].

The regime of strong coupling is further discussed in the work of Rodriguez and Gómez Rivas [4

4. S. R. K. Rodriguez and J. Gómez Rivas, “Surface lattice resonances strongly coupled to Rhodamine 6G excitons: tuning the plasmon-exciton-polariton mass and composition,” Opt. Express 21(20), 27411– 27421 (2013).

]. Using energy-momentum spectroscopy, the authors investigate the coupling mechanisms between lattice resonances and organic excitons. They show that the lattice constant controls the properties of the hybridization and that the effective mass of the coupled system can be reduced. This is a prerequisite to achieve quantum condensation.

Raza et al. [5

5. S. Raza, W. Yan, N. Stenger, M. Wubs, and N. Asger Mortensen, “Blueshift of the surface plasmon resonance in silver nanoparticles: substrate effects,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27344– 27421 (2013).

] have studied the blueshift of the surface plasmon resonance of Ag nanoparticles with decreasing particle diameter from 26 to 3.5 nm. A blueshift of 0.5 eV observed from EELS was in qualitative agreement with the nonlocal hydrodynamic model, for which a nonlocal Clausius-Mossotti factor was derived. The authors suggested the neglect of the intrinsic properties of silver as a possible mechanism for the observed quantitative deviation between theory and experiment.Emission and nonlinearities: By examining light emission from the junction of a STM in the presence of 20 nm topographical features in thin gold films, Divitt et al. [6

6. S. Divitt, P. Bharadwaj, and L. Novotny, “The role of gap plasmons in light emission from tunnel junctions,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27452– 27459 (2013).

] show that the variability in STM photoemission rates between a gold tip and a gold film under ambient conditions is due to the modification of localized gap plasmon modes. The electro-luminescence from gold clusters on the STM probe apex was typically negligible.

The enhancement of optical nonlinearities using plasmonic structures is of strong current interest. Khurgin and Sun [8

8. J. B. Khurgin and G. Sun, “Plasmonic enhancement of the third order nonlinear optical phenomena: figures of merit,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27460– 27480 (2013).

] investigated the plasmonic enhancement of 3rd order nonlinear optical phenomena in metal-cladded dielectric waveguides, with the nonlinearity originating in the dielectric. They find that the effective nonlinear index is strongly enhanced relative to the bulk dielectric but that propagation losses limit the overall efficiency.Sensors: Because of their nature, surface plasmons are routinely used to probe and monitor minute changes in the refractive index of the bounding dielectric environment. With the quest to ever more sensitive platforms, Špačková and Homola numerically investigate the figure-of-merit of lattice resonances [9

9. B. Špačková and J. Homola, “Sensing properties of lattice resonances of 2D metal nanoparticle arrays: An analytical model,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27490– 27502 (2013).

]. They found that while this parameter is comparable to that for surface sensing on non-ordered arrays of nanoparticles, lattice resonances outperform when the bulk surrounding refractive index changes.

The large field enhancement and strong focusing of light produced by localized plasmons allow using them as “lighthouses”, whereby any substance in the vicinity of the metallic particles sustaining plasmons are detected with a minimum of noise, as the surrounding environment is comparatively less exposed to the applied light. Using this principle, Punj et al. [10

10. D. Punj, J. de Torres, H. Rigneault, and J. Wenger, “Gold nanoparticles for enhanced single molecule fluorescence analysis at micromolar concentration,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27338– 27343 (2013).

] have managed to detect micromolar concentrations in zeptomol volumes with improved sensitivity by combining it with fluorescence correlation analysis.Nano-particles and nano-antennas: Pors and Bozhevolnyi [11

11. A. Pors and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonic metasurfaces for efficient phase control in reflection,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27438– 27451 (2013).

] investigate theoretically the absorption and scattering properties of an array composed of gap surface plasmon resonators. The authors introduced the concept of a birefringent metal surface to control the phase of polarized light and meta-scatterers to steer light beams in integrated nanophotonic systems.

Earl et al. [12

12. S. K. Earl, T. D. James, T. J. Davis, J. C. McCallum, R. E. Marvel, R. F. Haglund Jr, and A. Roberts, “Tunable optical antennas enabled by the phase transition in vanadium dioxide,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27503– 27508 (2013).

] investigated tunable optical antenna arrays as resonating Ag nano-structures on films of VO2. Tuning was achieved thermally by inducing a phase transition in VO2, by heating the film above its critical temperature (68 °C). Tuning of resonant wavelengths by up to 110 nm was observed.

The field of plasmonics has witnessed an impressive, continued effort to devise simple analytical descriptions of the interaction of light with nanostructures. Following this tradition, a new method has been put forward by Bai et al. to analyze the scattering of light by resonant plasmonic antennas [13

13. Q. Bai, M. Perrin, C. Sauvan, J.-P. Hugonin, and P. Lalanne, “Efficient and intuitive method for the analysis of light scattering by a resonant nanostructure,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27371– 27382 (2013).

].

Weeber et al. [16

16. J.-C. Weeber, T. Bernardin, M. G. Nielsen, K. Hassan, S. Kaya, J. Fatome, C. Finot, A. Dereux, and N. Pleros, “Nanosecond thermo-optical dynamics of polymer loaded plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27291– 27305 (2013).

] investigated the thermo-optic dynamics of polymer-loaded plasmonic waveguides driven photo-thermally on ns time scales. They demonstrated the thermally-modulated absorption of SPP modes, by thermally modulating the absorption of the metal (i.e., they exploit the temperature-dependent Ohmic loss of metals). Modulation depths of up to 50% were observed, with 2 and 800 ns characteristic times. Racetrack-shaped resonators were also investigated.

Babicheva et al. [17

17. V. E. Babicheva, N. Kinsey, G. V. Naik, M. Ferrera, A. V. Lavrinenko, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, “Towards CMOS-compatible nanophotonics: Ultra-compact modulators using alternative plasmonic materials,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27326– 27337 (2013).

] propose ultra-compact plasmonic modulators using alternative plasmonic materials, such as transparent conducting oxides and titanium nitride, with a view towards eventual integration with silicon electronics. They exploit the carrier refraction effect in a conducting oxide, whereby modulating the carrier density therein modulates the loss of the SPPs. They predict extinction ratios of up to ~45 dB/μm.

Schmidt et al. [18

18. S. Schmidt, P. Engelke, B. Piglosiewicz, M. Esmann, S. F. Becker, K. Yoo, N. Park, C. Lienau, and P. Groß, “Wave front adaptation using a deformable mirror for adiabatic nanofocusing along an ultrasharp gold taper,” Opt. Express 21(22), 26564–26577 (2013). [CrossRef]

] propose and demonstrate the use of a deformable mirror to increase the excitation efficiency to SPPs by a grating coupler fabricated on a conical ultra-sharp gold taper. The deformable mirror adaptively controls the wave front of the incident far field light. The shape of the mirror was optimized to maximize the intensity of the light scattered from the tip by nanofocused SPPs converging thereon. They find that a highly astigmatic beam profile maximizes the nanofocusing efficiency of their structure.Ultrafast phenomena: Lemke et al. [19

19. C. Lemke, T. Leißner, A. Klick, J. W. Radke, J. Fiutowski, J. Kjelstrup-Hansen, H.-G. Rubahn, and M. Bauer, “Measurement of surface plasmon autocorrelation functions,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27392– 27401 (2013).

] demonstrated a plasmonic autocorrelator for SPP pulse characterization based on a wedge-shaped structure which continuously increases the time delay (0 ~ 30 fs) between two interfering SPPs. The autocorrelation signal monitored by non-linear two-photon photoemission electron microscopy also provided the mapping of SPP field amplitudes in a direct manner.

Zerula and co-workers [20

20. B. Ashall, J. F. López-Barberá, E. McClean-Ilten, and D. Zerulla, “Highly efficient broadband ultrafast plasmonics,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27383– 27391 (2013).

] introduce an engineered periodic surface to efficiently excite surface plasmons over the entire spectral content of a sub-20 fs laser pulse. A nearly dispersion-less mode is identified by energy-momentum spectroscopy. The ability to excite propagating broadband modes with no chirp is an important step for controlling the ultrafast dynamics of surface plasmons.

In closing, we hope that researchers will enjoy reading this Focus Issue, and we extend to all an enthusiastic invitation to the 7th edition of the SPP conference series which will be held in Jerusalem May 31 to June 5, 2015.

References and links

1.

D. Pile, “View from SPP6: New directions in plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics 7(8), 594–596 (2013). [CrossRef]

2.

A. Wiener, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, J. B. Pendry, A. P. Borsfield, and S. A. Maier, “Nonlocal propagation and tunnelling of surface plasmons in metallic hourglass waveguides,” Opt. Express 21(20), 27509–27519 (2013).

3.

T. V. Teperik, P. Nordlander, J. Aizpurua, and A. G. Borisov, “Quantum effects and nonlocality in strongly coupled plasmonic nanowire dimers,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27306– 27325 (2013).

4.

S. R. K. Rodriguez and J. Gómez Rivas, “Surface lattice resonances strongly coupled to Rhodamine 6G excitons: tuning the plasmon-exciton-polariton mass and composition,” Opt. Express 21(20), 27411– 27421 (2013).

5.

S. Raza, W. Yan, N. Stenger, M. Wubs, and N. Asger Mortensen, “Blueshift of the surface plasmon resonance in silver nanoparticles: substrate effects,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27344– 27421 (2013).

6.

S. Divitt, P. Bharadwaj, and L. Novotny, “The role of gap plasmons in light emission from tunnel junctions,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27452– 27459 (2013).

7.

M. P. van Exter, V. T. Tenner, F. van Beijnum, M. J. A. de Dood, P. J. van Veldhoven, E. J. Geluk, and G. W. 't Hooft, “Surface plasmon dispersion in metal hole array lasers,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27422– 27437 (2013).

8.

J. B. Khurgin and G. Sun, “Plasmonic enhancement of the third order nonlinear optical phenomena: figures of merit,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27460– 27480 (2013).

9.

B. Špačková and J. Homola, “Sensing properties of lattice resonances of 2D metal nanoparticle arrays: An analytical model,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27490– 27502 (2013).

10.

D. Punj, J. de Torres, H. Rigneault, and J. Wenger, “Gold nanoparticles for enhanced single molecule fluorescence analysis at micromolar concentration,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27338– 27343 (2013).

11.

A. Pors and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonic metasurfaces for efficient phase control in reflection,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27438– 27451 (2013).

12.

S. K. Earl, T. D. James, T. J. Davis, J. C. McCallum, R. E. Marvel, R. F. Haglund Jr, and A. Roberts, “Tunable optical antennas enabled by the phase transition in vanadium dioxide,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27503– 27508 (2013).

13.

Q. Bai, M. Perrin, C. Sauvan, J.-P. Hugonin, and P. Lalanne, “Efficient and intuitive method for the analysis of light scattering by a resonant nanostructure,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27371– 27382 (2013).

14.

G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. García-Martín, M. U. González, F. García, D. Meneses-Rodríguez, N. de Sousa, and L. S. Froufe-Pérez, “Mimicking electromagnetically induced transparency in the magneto-optical activity of magnetoplasmonic nanoresonators,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27356– 27370 (2013).

15.

J. Takahara and M. Miyata, “Mutual mode control of short- and long-range surface plasmons,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27402– 27410 (2013).

16.

J.-C. Weeber, T. Bernardin, M. G. Nielsen, K. Hassan, S. Kaya, J. Fatome, C. Finot, A. Dereux, and N. Pleros, “Nanosecond thermo-optical dynamics of polymer loaded plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27291– 27305 (2013).

17.

V. E. Babicheva, N. Kinsey, G. V. Naik, M. Ferrera, A. V. Lavrinenko, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, “Towards CMOS-compatible nanophotonics: Ultra-compact modulators using alternative plasmonic materials,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27326– 27337 (2013).

18.

S. Schmidt, P. Engelke, B. Piglosiewicz, M. Esmann, S. F. Becker, K. Yoo, N. Park, C. Lienau, and P. Groß, “Wave front adaptation using a deformable mirror for adiabatic nanofocusing along an ultrasharp gold taper,” Opt. Express 21(22), 26564–26577 (2013). [CrossRef]

19.

C. Lemke, T. Leißner, A. Klick, J. W. Radke, J. Fiutowski, J. Kjelstrup-Hansen, H.-G. Rubahn, and M. Bauer, “Measurement of surface plasmon autocorrelation functions,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27392– 27401 (2013).

20.

B. Ashall, J. F. López-Barberá, E. McClean-Ilten, and D. Zerulla, “Highly efficient broadband ultrafast plasmonics,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27383– 27391 (2013).

21.

K. Imaeda and K. Imura, “Optical control of plasmonic fields by phase modulated pulse excitations,” Opt. Express 21(22), 27481– 27489 (2013).

OCIS Codes
(240.6680) Optics at surfaces : Surface plasmons

History
Original Manuscript: October 23, 2013
Published: November 4, 2013

Virtual Issues
Surface Plasmon Photonics (2013) Optics Express

Citation
Pierre Berini, Alexandre Bouhelier, Javier Garcia de Abajo, and Namkyoo Park, "Focus issue on surface plasmon photonics introduction," Opt. Express 21, 27286-27290 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-22-27286


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Pile, “View from SPP6: New directions in plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics7(8), 594–596 (2013). [CrossRef]
  2. A. Wiener, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, J. B. Pendry, A. P. Borsfield, and S. A. Maier, “Nonlocal propagation and tunnelling of surface plasmons in metallic hourglass waveguides,” Opt. Express21(20), 27509–27519 (2013).
  3. T. V. Teperik, P. Nordlander, J. Aizpurua, and A. G. Borisov, “Quantum effects and nonlocality in strongly coupled plasmonic nanowire dimers,” Opt. Express21(22), 27306– 27325 (2013).
  4. S. R. K. Rodriguez and J. Gómez Rivas, “Surface lattice resonances strongly coupled to Rhodamine 6G excitons: tuning the plasmon-exciton-polariton mass and composition,” Opt. Express21(20), 27411– 27421 (2013).
  5. S. Raza, W. Yan, N. Stenger, M. Wubs, and N. Asger Mortensen, “Blueshift of the surface plasmon resonance in silver nanoparticles: substrate effects,” Opt. Express21(22), 27344– 27421 (2013).
  6. S. Divitt, P. Bharadwaj, and L. Novotny, “The role of gap plasmons in light emission from tunnel junctions,” Opt. Express21(22), 27452– 27459 (2013).
  7. M. P. van Exter, V. T. Tenner, F. van Beijnum, M. J. A. de Dood, P. J. van Veldhoven, E. J. Geluk, and G. W. 't Hooft, “Surface plasmon dispersion in metal hole array lasers,” Opt. Express21(22), 27422– 27437 (2013).
  8. J. B. Khurgin and G. Sun, “Plasmonic enhancement of the third order nonlinear optical phenomena: figures of merit,” Opt. Express21(22), 27460– 27480 (2013).
  9. B. Špačková and J. Homola, “Sensing properties of lattice resonances of 2D metal nanoparticle arrays: An analytical model,” Opt. Express21(22), 27490– 27502 (2013).
  10. D. Punj, J. de Torres, H. Rigneault, and J. Wenger, “Gold nanoparticles for enhanced single molecule fluorescence analysis at micromolar concentration,” Opt. Express21(22), 27338– 27343 (2013).
  11. A. Pors and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Plasmonic metasurfaces for efficient phase control in reflection,” Opt. Express21(22), 27438– 27451 (2013).
  12. S. K. Earl, T. D. James, T. J. Davis, J. C. McCallum, R. E. Marvel, R. F. Haglund, and A. Roberts, “Tunable optical antennas enabled by the phase transition in vanadium dioxide,” Opt. Express21(22), 27503– 27508 (2013).
  13. Q. Bai, M. Perrin, C. Sauvan, J.-P. Hugonin, and P. Lalanne, “Efficient and intuitive method for the analysis of light scattering by a resonant nanostructure,” Opt. Express21(22), 27371– 27382 (2013).
  14. G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, A. García-Martín, M. U. González, F. García, D. Meneses-Rodríguez, N. de Sousa, and L. S. Froufe-Pérez, “Mimicking electromagnetically induced transparency in the magneto-optical activity of magnetoplasmonic nanoresonators,” Opt. Express21(22), 27356– 27370 (2013).
  15. J. Takahara and M. Miyata, “Mutual mode control of short- and long-range surface plasmons,” Opt. Express21(22), 27402– 27410 (2013).
  16. J.-C. Weeber, T. Bernardin, M. G. Nielsen, K. Hassan, S. Kaya, J. Fatome, C. Finot, A. Dereux, and N. Pleros, “Nanosecond thermo-optical dynamics of polymer loaded plasmonic waveguides,” Opt. Express21(22), 27291– 27305 (2013).
  17. V. E. Babicheva, N. Kinsey, G. V. Naik, M. Ferrera, A. V. Lavrinenko, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, “Towards CMOS-compatible nanophotonics: Ultra-compact modulators using alternative plasmonic materials,” Opt. Express21(22), 27326– 27337 (2013).
  18. S. Schmidt, P. Engelke, B. Piglosiewicz, M. Esmann, S. F. Becker, K. Yoo, N. Park, C. Lienau, and P. Groß, “Wave front adaptation using a deformable mirror for adiabatic nanofocusing along an ultrasharp gold taper,” Opt. Express21(22), 26564–26577 (2013). [CrossRef]
  19. C. Lemke, T. Leißner, A. Klick, J. W. Radke, J. Fiutowski, J. Kjelstrup-Hansen, H.-G. Rubahn, and M. Bauer, “Measurement of surface plasmon autocorrelation functions,” Opt. Express21(22), 27392– 27401 (2013).
  20. B. Ashall, J. F. López-Barberá, E. McClean-Ilten, and D. Zerulla, “Highly efficient broadband ultrafast plasmonics,” Opt. Express21(22), 27383– 27391 (2013).
  21. K. Imaeda and K. Imura, “Optical control of plasmonic fields by phase modulated pulse excitations,” Opt. Express21(22), 27481– 27489 (2013).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited