OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 23 — Nov. 18, 2013
  • pp: 27550–27557
« Show journal navigation

Investigation of cascaded SiN microring resonators at 1.3 µm and 1.5 µm

Vanessa Zamora, Peter Lützow, Martin Weiland, and Daniel Pergande  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 23, pp. 27550-27557 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.027550


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1253 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

An optical device operating at wavelengths around 1.3 µm and 1.5 µm is demonstrated experimentally. It is based on cascaded microring resonators (CMRRs) and the Vernier effect (VE). The architecture consists of two microring resonators (MRRs) connected via a common waveguide; two waveguides were added for the interrogation of CMRRs. The free spectral ranges of both MRRs are slightly different in order to activate the VE, which is known to enhance the sensitivity in optical sensors. CMRRs were fabricated on a silicon nitride (SiN) platform. Two types of buffer layers—benzocyclobutene (BCB) polymer and thermal silicon oxide (SiOx)—were tested. A study of CMRRs was carried out with three structures of different structural parameters. The experimental results show good agreement with the theoretical analysis. This approach is promising for the fabrication of highly sensitive optical sensors in wide operating wavelength range.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Integrated optical devices are remarkable tools for analysis and fast data acquisition in sensing and telecommunication applications. In detection and sensing areas, they possess potential features such as label-free detection of target molecules, integration of arrays of compact structures on a single chip for a simultaneously detection of several analytes, and the ability for high volume fabrication. As the fabrication process is compatible with CMOS technology even electronics integration is feasible. Several optical circuits have been developed so far such as waveguides [1

1. G. Rong, A. Najmaie, J. E. Sipe, and S. M. Weiss, “Nanoscale porous silicon waveguide for label-free DNA sensing,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 23(10), 1572–1576 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], Mach-Zehnder interferometers [2

2. A. Densmore, D.-X. Xu, S. Janz, P. Waldron, T. Mischki, G. Lopinski, A. Delâge, J. Lapointe, P. Cheben, B. Lamontagne, and J. H. Schmid, “Spiral-path high-sensitivity silicon photonic wire molecular sensor with temperature-independent response,” Opt. Lett. 33(6), 596–598 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], directional couplers [3

3. S. Nacer and A. Aissat, “Optical sensing by silicon slot-based directional couplers,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 44(1-2), 35–43 (2012). [CrossRef]

], photonic crystals [4

4. D. Dorfner, T. Zabel, T. Hürlimann, N. Hauke, L. Frandsen, U. Rant, G. Abstreiter, and J. Finley, “Photonic crystal nanostructures for optical biosensing applications,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 24(12), 3688–3692 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and microring resonators (MRRs) [5

5. A. Ramachandran, S. Wang, J. Clarke, S. J. Ja, D. Goad, L. Wald, E. M. Flood, E. Knobbe, J. V. Hryniewicz, S. T. Chu, D. Gill, W. Chen, O. King, and B. E. Little, “A universal biosensing platform based on optical micro-ring resonators,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 23(7), 939–944 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,6

6. A. Ksendzov and Y. Lin, “Integrated optics ring-resonator sensors for protein detection,” Opt. Lett. 30(24), 3344–3346 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Among them, MRRs are a favored candidate due to their high sensitivity and ultra-compactness. In addition, an array of MRRs for multiplexed detection has been demonstrated [7

7. C. F. Carlborg, K. B. Gylfason, A. Kaźmierczak, F. Dortu, M. J. Bañuls Polo, A. Maquieira Catala, G. M. Kresbach, H. Sohlström, T. Moh, L. Vivien, J. Popplewell, G. Ronan, C. A. Barrios, G. Stemme, and W. van der Wijngaart, “A packaged optical slot-waveguide ring resonator sensor array for multiplex label-free assays in labs-on-chips,” Lab Chip 10(3), 281–290 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9

9. D. X. Xu, M. Vachon, A. Densmore, R. Ma, A. Delâge, S. Janz, J. Lapointe, Y. Li, G. Lopinski, D. Zhang, Q. Y. Liu, P. Cheben, and J. H. Schmid, “Label-free biosensor array on silicon-on-insulator ring resonators addressed using a WDM approach,” Opt. Lett. 35(16), 2771–2773 (2010). [CrossRef]

].

MRRs exploit the interaction of the waveguide’s evanescent field with the external medium. In this manner, the refractive index change caused by an analyte on the waveguide surface can be monitored by the resonance wavelength shift. Bulk refractive index sensitivities (BRISs) from 70 to 200 nm/RIU (refractive index unit) and limits of detection (LODs) from 10−4 to 10−6 RIU were reported using MRRs [5

5. A. Ramachandran, S. Wang, J. Clarke, S. J. Ja, D. Goad, L. Wald, E. M. Flood, E. Knobbe, J. V. Hryniewicz, S. T. Chu, D. Gill, W. Chen, O. King, and B. E. Little, “A universal biosensing platform based on optical micro-ring resonators,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 23(7), 939–944 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9

9. D. X. Xu, M. Vachon, A. Densmore, R. Ma, A. Delâge, S. Janz, J. Lapointe, Y. Li, G. Lopinski, D. Zhang, Q. Y. Liu, P. Cheben, and J. H. Schmid, “Label-free biosensor array on silicon-on-insulator ring resonators addressed using a WDM approach,” Opt. Lett. 35(16), 2771–2773 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. A meaningful progress in the development of MRR-based sensors can be recognized during the last years, especially the high interest in order to improve sensitivity and LOD of MRRs.

Cascaded microring resonators (CMRRs) exploiting the Vernier effect (VE) are novel structures to achieve maximum sensitivity. Firstly, CMRRs were investigated theoretically [10

10. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Highly-sensitive optical sensor using two cascaded-microring resonators with vernier effect,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, Technical Digest (TD) (Optical Society of America, 2009), paper TuM4. [CrossRef]

,11

11. D. Dai, “Highly sensitive digital optical sensor based on cascaded high-Q ring-resonators,” Opt. Express 17(26), 23817–23822 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and later experimentally [12

12. T. Claes, W. Bogaerts, and P. Bienstman, “Experimental characterization of a silicon photonic biosensor consisting of two cascaded ring resonators based on the Vernier effect and introduction of a curve fitting method for an improved detection limit,” Opt. Express 18(22), 22747–22761 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14

14. J. Hu and D. Dai, “Cascaded-ring optical sensor with enhanced sensitivity by using suspended Si-nanowires,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23(13), 842–844 (2011). [CrossRef]

] based on a Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) platform. An BRIS of 2169 nm/RIU was obtained for NaCl concentrations in DI water solutions compared to 76 nm/RIU for a single MRR [12

12. T. Claes, W. Bogaerts, and P. Bienstman, “Experimental characterization of a silicon photonic biosensor consisting of two cascaded ring resonators based on the Vernier effect and introduction of a curve fitting method for an improved detection limit,” Opt. Express 18(22), 22747–22761 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Later, a low cost system for an intensity interrogation method of CMRRs was investigated by using a low-cost broadband source [15

15. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Optical waveguide double-ring sensor using intensity interrogation with a low-cost broadband source,” Opt. Lett. 36(7), 1128–1130 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. All these devices operated at a wavelength of 1.5 µm.

Here, we investigate CMRRs based on a silicon nitride (SiN) platform in the spectral windows of 1.3 µm and 1.5 µm, respectively. Three structures with two different buffer layers −benzocyclobutene (BCB) polymer and thermal silicon oxide (SiOx) − were fabricated and characterized optically. The experimental results are compared with the simple theoretical analysis reported previously [16

16. V. Zamora, P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Cascaded microring resonators for biomedical applications: improved sensitivity at large tuning range,” Proc. SPIE 8570, 857002, 857002–857008 (2013). [CrossRef]

]. Tapered grating couplers were integrated at the ends of the waveguides for the investigation of CMRRs at 1.5 µm. Gratings enable a reliable coupling of the light between the chip and optical fibers at moderate alignment tolerances. First devices have been demonstrated operating in a wide operating range to be utilized as optical sensors for biological and chemical applications.

Additionally, polymers like BCB possess good thermal transmission properties being an excellent candidate for the incorporation of individual micro-heater electrodes in MRRs as suggested in [16

16. V. Zamora, P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Cascaded microring resonators for biomedical applications: improved sensitivity at large tuning range,” Proc. SPIE 8570, 857002, 857002–857008 (2013). [CrossRef]

]. This approach permits the spectral tuning of the resonances compensating the deviations of the fabrication process [8

8. P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Integrated optical sensor platform for multiparameter bio-chemical analysis,” Opt. Express 19(14), 13277–13284 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In this paper we present the design and experimental results of first CMRR circuits based on BCB buffer layers. BCB can be an alternative material compared to the standard SiOx material offering unique properties, practical handling and low cost.

2. CMRRs design, fabrication and characterization method

The principle of operation of CMRR circuits is based on the VE. It is defined as the superposition of two signals with different free spectral ranges (FSRs) as shown in Fig. 1(a)
Fig. 1 (a) Vernier principle of two cascaded systems. (b) Configuration of CMRRs to exploit the VE. (c) Scheme of the cross section of a SiN ridge waveguide.
. Here, the periodicity of the resulting beat signal defines the new FSR, which is larger than the FSR of the individual signals. Thereby, VE can be generated simply by cascading two systems whose signals display slightly different FSR. Firstly, this principle has been exploited only to expand the FSR of filter devices [17

17. S. J. Choi, Z. Peng, Q. Yang, and P. D. Dapkus, “Tunable narrow linewidth all-buried heterostructure ring resonator filters using vernier effects,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(1), 106–108 (2005). [CrossRef]

,18

18. G. Ren, T. Cao, and S. Chen, “Design and analysis of a cascaded microring resonator-based thermo-optical tunable filter with ultralarge free spectrum range and low power consumption,” Opt. Eng. 50(7), 074601 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. Thereafter, its application has been focused on BRIS enhancement in optical sensors [10

10. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Highly-sensitive optical sensor using two cascaded-microring resonators with vernier effect,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, Technical Digest (TD) (Optical Society of America, 2009), paper TuM4. [CrossRef]

15

15. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Optical waveguide double-ring sensor using intensity interrogation with a low-cost broadband source,” Opt. Lett. 36(7), 1128–1130 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Here, we propose CMRRs-based devices formed by cascading two MRRs as is illustrated in Fig. 1(b). The two MRRs are connected via a bus waveguide and two additional waveguides are used to couple light in and out of the device. For sensing operation, the structure—filter element (MRRf) and waveguides—is passivated by using a top cladding layer except the sensor element (MRRs). Here the evanescent field of the MRRs interacts with the external medium causing a small refractive index change and resulting in a large wavelength shift of the Vernier spectrum.

Tapered grating couplers are used for optical interfacing of the optical circuit with feeding optical fibers as these coupling elements enable efficient coupling performance and moderate alignment tolerances. An efficient coupling of 60% at wavelengths of 1.31 µm has been previously reported using grating couplers integrated on SiN waveguides [19

19. G. Maire, L. Vivien, G. Sattler, A. Kaźmierczak, B. Sanchez, K. B. Gylfason, A. Griol, D. Marris-Morini, E. Cassan, D. Giannone, H. Sohlström, and D. Hill, “High efficiency silicon nitride surface grating couplers,” Opt. Express 16(1), 328–333 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

CMRRs are based on SiN platform technology where waveguides have a ridge shape as illustrated in Fig. 1(c). Three types of SiN structures were designed (c. f. Table 1

Table 1. Nominal parameters for Structures I, II and III

table-icon
View This Table
): Structure I and Structure II consist of SiN waveguides (nSiN = 1.94) with a buffer layer of BCB (nBCB = 1.55). Structure III is based on SiN waveguides (nSiN = 1.98) on SiOx buffer layer (nSiOx = 1.46). Here, BCB is utilized as a top cladding layer. The effective (n) and group (ng) refractive indices of waveguides were calculated as described in [16

16. V. Zamora, P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Cascaded microring resonators for biomedical applications: improved sensitivity at large tuning range,” Proc. SPIE 8570, 857002, 857002–857008 (2013). [CrossRef]

]. Initially, all structures were designed for TE single mode light propagation at 1.5 µm. In addition, Structures I and II support TE resonances at 1.3 µm. The difference between both radii (Rf and Rs) is defined by ΔR where Rs>Rf, e. g., this value is ΔR = 298 µm - 297 µm = 1 µm for Structure I.

The FSR of individual MRRs can be calculated by using FSRi = λ2/ng,iLi, where ng,i and Li are the group refractive index and circumference of each MRR. Both FSRs of individual MRRs leading to estimate the VernierFSR (FSRVE) using the standard expression given by

FSRVE=FSRfFSRs/|FSRsFSRf|.
(1)

From (1), FSRVE values at λ = 1.3 µm were found to be of 105 nm and 41.3 nm for Structures I and II, respectively. Note that the FSRVE is larger when the difference of individual FSRs is smaller.

The VernierBRIS (SVE) in CMRR scan be calculated from the BRIS (S) of the sensor element multiplied by an amplification factor (M) that depends on the difference of FSRs [12

12. T. Claes, W. Bogaerts, and P. Bienstman, “Experimental characterization of a silicon photonic biosensor consisting of two cascaded ring resonators based on the Vernier effect and introduction of a curve fitting method for an improved detection limit,” Opt. Express 18(22), 22747–22761 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]:

SVE=(FSRf/|FSRsFSRf|)(λ/ng,s·δns/δnmedium)=M·S
(2)

Here, δns and δnmedium are the effective index change and the index change of the sensing medium, respectively. An M factor at λ = 1.5 µm can be expected of 51.6for Structure III with l = 10 µm when water (nmedium = 1.33) covers the sensor element.

CMRRs were elaborated by using a standard lithographic technique [8

8. P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Integrated optical sensor platform for multiparameter bio-chemical analysis,” Opt. Express 19(14), 13277–13284 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For Structures I and II, a 7 µm-thick BCB polymer was spin-coated on a commercial 4″ silicon (Si) wafer. Afterwards, a 400 nm-thick SiN layer (nSiN = 1.94) was deposited on top of the BCB layer by using ICP-PECVD followed by a dry etching process to fabricate a ridge depth of 250 nm. Here, the waveguides have no top cladding layer. All MRRs had a racetrack shape with a straight section length (l) of 10 µm, and coupling gap of 1 µm. For Structure III, a 250 nm-thick SiN layer (nSiN = 1.98) was deposited via LPCVD on a thermal SiOx layer of 8 µm thickness. A ridge depth of 180 nm was obtained by dry etching. Finally, the complete structure except the MRRss was covered with a BCB layer of 4 µm thickness. In this structure, the straight section lengths vary from 10 µm to 50 µm. Figure 2
Fig. 2 Microscope images for two types of CMRRs fabricated on SiN platform: (a) Structure I with a buffer layer of BCB and (b) Structure III with a buffer layer of SiOx and top cladding layer of BCB on MRRfs. (c) Top view of the tapered grating coupler with a period of 1.2 µm. Inset images in Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 2(b) show the coupling region between the bus waveguide and MRR. All MRRs have a nominal gap of 1 µm.
shows the microscope images of fabricated structures: CMRRs, coupling region of waveguides, and the tapered grating coupler with a period of 1.2 µm – grating width of 0.6 µm and spacing of 0.6 µm – localized at the feeding ends of waveguides in Structure III.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Optical devices operating at 1.3 µm

Structures I and II were characterized optically at 1.3 µm. Single MRRss from Structure II show resonances with a Q-factor about 104 and an FSRs of ~0.45 nm. The waveguides on BCB have propagation losses of about 10 dB/cm. Figure 3
Fig. 3 Transmission spectra of SiN CMRRs for (a) Structure I (ΔR = 1 µm) and (b) Structure II (ΔR = 3 µm). Purple dots indicate the positions of the transmission maxima and the fitted envelope is drawn as a black line.
shows the transmission spectra of CMRRs with two slightly different radii: (a) ΔR = 1 µm and (b) ΔR = 3 µm. The typical Vernier spectrum (pink line), that is constituted by a series of peaks whose envelope of maxima (purple dots) have a Lorentzian shape, is observed for both cases between 1.27 – 1.335 µm. The experimental analysis of the spectrum is based on a Lorentzian fit of the envelope of the maxima. After an individual fit of the amplitudes of the peaks, the envelope was generated by localizing the maxima. The obtained fit envelopes were centered at 1.27927 µm and 1.32378 µm, their widths (ΔλVEs) were found to be of 3.53 nm and 2.29 nm, respectively. Concerning the FSRVE, defined as the spectral distance between two peaks at center of the envelope, they can be estimated by using (1). FSRVEs about 131.7 nm and 47.21 nm, respectively, were calculated. Only one complete Vernier peak can be observed within the laser tuning range (1.27 – 1.34 µm). In Fig. 3(a), a significant deviation of the amplitudes of individual peaks compared to the fitted envelope can be identified. This discrepancy originates from perturbations caused by mechanical oscillations of the fibers which can cause an error on the fit of the envelope as well. This becomes critical for monitoring small changes in the external medium of the sensor element of CMRRs and finally deteriorates the LOD.

The theoretical model presented in [16

16. V. Zamora, P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Cascaded microring resonators for biomedical applications: improved sensitivity at large tuning range,” Proc. SPIE 8570, 857002, 857002–857008 (2013). [CrossRef]

] has been used to simulate the spectrum of Fig. 3(b). The model is based on an ideal filter MRR generalized for two cascaded MRRs. Initially, the experimental spectrum of each MRR was reconstructed by a simple add-drop filter model, where a finite difference time domain method (FDTD) was utilized in order to obtain the losses (f) and coupling coefficient (α) parameters that were used later as input for the simulations of CMRRs. Afterwards, the spectral position was matched by adjusting the radii (Rf and Rs) until the solutions closely reproduced the experimental Vernier spectrum. This slight adjust in radius can be included within fabrication tolerances. Figure 4
Fig. 4 Transmission spectra of SiN CMRRs for Structure II: (a) experimental and (b) theoretical results. Simulation parameters following [16]: α1 = α2 = α11 = α12 = 0.957, f1 = f2 = 0.97, ng,f = ng,s = 1.969292, Rf = 297.03 µm, Rs = 299.918 µm, l = 10 µm.
illustrates the normalized experimental spectrum and the theoretical results. The parameters used for such simulations are given in the figure caption. The theoretical envelope is centered at 1.3235 µm having a ΔλVE of 2.23 nm, while the center of the experimental envelope is shifted around 280 pm with a 60 pm wider ΔλVE. These values show good agreement in spite of that the calculations were done considering ideal MRRs where the propagation loss was assumed wavelengths independent over the investigated spectral range as well as the fabrication tolerances of CMRRs were not taken into account. The envelope fit in Fig. 4(b) was achieved as explained previously.

3.2 Optical devices operating at 1.5 µm

Structure II was investigated also in order to study the VE at 1.5 µm. In Fig. 5(a)
Fig. 5 Transmission spectrum at wavelengths around 1.5 µm for Structure II: (a) experimental and (b) theoretical results. Simulation parameters following [16]: α1 = α2 = α11 = α12 = 0.915, f1 = f2 = 0.935, ng,f = ng,s = 1.920625, Rf = 297.03 µm, Rs = 300.02 µm, l = 10 µm.
, the transmission spectrum has been measured between 1.55 µm and 1.65 µm. Here, two Vernier peaks were centered at 1.57165 µm and 1.63685 µm, respectively, resulting in an FSRVE of 65.2 nm. The FSRVE calculated using (1) is 68.2 nm, which is a good approximation to the experimental value. The envelope fit for each Vernier peak showed a ΔλVE of 6.85 nm and 10.24 nm, respectively. This spectrum was obtained via the theoretical model as explained above. Figure 5(b) shows the calculated Vernier peaks centered at 1.56879 µm and 1.64013 µm using the parameters given in the figure caption as input of the theoretical model mentioned above. A large theoretical FSRVE of 71.34 nm was found by and the envelope widths differ 142 pm and 2.49 nm, respectively, from the values of the measured spectrum. These theoretical results are based on an analytical model where the absorption of materials and the material dispersion were not considered. Here, this effect has been relevant for longer wavelengths, resulting in a moderately good approximation to the experimental results. Note that the amplitude difference of the two Vernier peaks in Fig. 5(a) originates from the wavelength-dependent coupling coefficient of the directional couplers.

Excellent stability in amplitude of the peaks has been measured in each spectrum using tapered grating couplers. The envelope of peaks was not affected by noisy effects due to slightly vibrating fibers. Nevertheless, an optimization of the coupling efficiency of the SiN grating couplers would improve the performance of the Vernier structures.

For sensing operation in aqueous solutions, a VernierBRIS of about S = (51.6)·(190 nm/RIU) = 9804 nm/RIU for Structure III can be expected by using (2)and the BRIS of the single MRR reported previously in [20

20. P. Lützow, D. Pergande, D. Gausa, S. Huscher, and H. Heidrich, “Microring resonator arrays for multiparameter biochemical analysis,” Proc. SPIE 8427(84270E), 84270E (2012). [CrossRef]

]. Concerning the LOD, a value about of 2.04 × 10−6 RIU− with a minimum detectable wavelength shift of 0.02 nm taking into account the noise level of our system −can be expected for the fabricated cascaded SiN MRRs. Then, CMRRs based on a SiN material are promising candidates for broad applications in sensing areas.

4. Conclusion

We investigated an optical device based on silicon nitride cascaded microring resonators (CMRRs) and the Vernier effect (VE). The characterization of the Vernier spectrum was carried out successfully around 1.3 µm and 1.5 µm, respectively. Three structures were fabricated with two different buffer materials and different structural parameters. For CMRRs on BCB, a detailed analysis of the Vernier spectrum was performed showing good agreement with the simulations. CMRRs on SiOx with different straight section lengths incorporating tapered grating couplers were measured at 1.5 µm, which exhibit a good stability of the Vernier spectrum. This study suggests that CMRRs based on SiN waveguides will be an excellent candidate to realize highly sensitive optical sensors for biological and chemical applications to be operated in a wide wavelength region.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with Dr. Helmut Heidrich from Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute (HHI).

References and links

1.

G. Rong, A. Najmaie, J. E. Sipe, and S. M. Weiss, “Nanoscale porous silicon waveguide for label-free DNA sensing,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 23(10), 1572–1576 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

A. Densmore, D.-X. Xu, S. Janz, P. Waldron, T. Mischki, G. Lopinski, A. Delâge, J. Lapointe, P. Cheben, B. Lamontagne, and J. H. Schmid, “Spiral-path high-sensitivity silicon photonic wire molecular sensor with temperature-independent response,” Opt. Lett. 33(6), 596–598 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

S. Nacer and A. Aissat, “Optical sensing by silicon slot-based directional couplers,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 44(1-2), 35–43 (2012). [CrossRef]

4.

D. Dorfner, T. Zabel, T. Hürlimann, N. Hauke, L. Frandsen, U. Rant, G. Abstreiter, and J. Finley, “Photonic crystal nanostructures for optical biosensing applications,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 24(12), 3688–3692 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

A. Ramachandran, S. Wang, J. Clarke, S. J. Ja, D. Goad, L. Wald, E. M. Flood, E. Knobbe, J. V. Hryniewicz, S. T. Chu, D. Gill, W. Chen, O. King, and B. E. Little, “A universal biosensing platform based on optical micro-ring resonators,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 23(7), 939–944 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

A. Ksendzov and Y. Lin, “Integrated optics ring-resonator sensors for protein detection,” Opt. Lett. 30(24), 3344–3346 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

C. F. Carlborg, K. B. Gylfason, A. Kaźmierczak, F. Dortu, M. J. Bañuls Polo, A. Maquieira Catala, G. M. Kresbach, H. Sohlström, T. Moh, L. Vivien, J. Popplewell, G. Ronan, C. A. Barrios, G. Stemme, and W. van der Wijngaart, “A packaged optical slot-waveguide ring resonator sensor array for multiplex label-free assays in labs-on-chips,” Lab Chip 10(3), 281–290 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Integrated optical sensor platform for multiparameter bio-chemical analysis,” Opt. Express 19(14), 13277–13284 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

D. X. Xu, M. Vachon, A. Densmore, R. Ma, A. Delâge, S. Janz, J. Lapointe, Y. Li, G. Lopinski, D. Zhang, Q. Y. Liu, P. Cheben, and J. H. Schmid, “Label-free biosensor array on silicon-on-insulator ring resonators addressed using a WDM approach,” Opt. Lett. 35(16), 2771–2773 (2010). [CrossRef]

10.

L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Highly-sensitive optical sensor using two cascaded-microring resonators with vernier effect,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, Technical Digest (TD) (Optical Society of America, 2009), paper TuM4. [CrossRef]

11.

D. Dai, “Highly sensitive digital optical sensor based on cascaded high-Q ring-resonators,” Opt. Express 17(26), 23817–23822 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

T. Claes, W. Bogaerts, and P. Bienstman, “Experimental characterization of a silicon photonic biosensor consisting of two cascaded ring resonators based on the Vernier effect and introduction of a curve fitting method for an improved detection limit,” Opt. Express 18(22), 22747–22761 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Highly-sensitive silicon-on-insulator sensor based on two cascaded-microring resonators with Vernier effect,” Opt. Commun. 284(1), 156–159 (2011). [CrossRef]

14.

J. Hu and D. Dai, “Cascaded-ring optical sensor with enhanced sensitivity by using suspended Si-nanowires,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 23(13), 842–844 (2011). [CrossRef]

15.

L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Optical waveguide double-ring sensor using intensity interrogation with a low-cost broadband source,” Opt. Lett. 36(7), 1128–1130 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

V. Zamora, P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Cascaded microring resonators for biomedical applications: improved sensitivity at large tuning range,” Proc. SPIE 8570, 857002, 857002–857008 (2013). [CrossRef]

17.

S. J. Choi, Z. Peng, Q. Yang, and P. D. Dapkus, “Tunable narrow linewidth all-buried heterostructure ring resonator filters using vernier effects,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(1), 106–108 (2005). [CrossRef]

18.

G. Ren, T. Cao, and S. Chen, “Design and analysis of a cascaded microring resonator-based thermo-optical tunable filter with ultralarge free spectrum range and low power consumption,” Opt. Eng. 50(7), 074601 (2011). [CrossRef]

19.

G. Maire, L. Vivien, G. Sattler, A. Kaźmierczak, B. Sanchez, K. B. Gylfason, A. Griol, D. Marris-Morini, E. Cassan, D. Giannone, H. Sohlström, and D. Hill, “High efficiency silicon nitride surface grating couplers,” Opt. Express 16(1), 328–333 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

P. Lützow, D. Pergande, D. Gausa, S. Huscher, and H. Heidrich, “Microring resonator arrays for multiparameter biochemical analysis,” Proc. SPIE 8427(84270E), 84270E (2012). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(130.3120) Integrated optics : Integrated optics devices
(130.6010) Integrated optics : Sensors
(230.5750) Optical devices : Resonators

ToC Category:
Integrated Optics

History
Original Manuscript: June 21, 2013
Revised Manuscript: August 16, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: August 21, 2013
Published: November 4, 2013

Citation
Vanessa Zamora, Peter Lützow, Martin Weiland, and Daniel Pergande, "Investigation of cascaded SiN microring resonators at 1.3 µm and 1.5 µm," Opt. Express 21, 27550-27557 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-23-27550


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. G. Rong, A. Najmaie, J. E. Sipe, and S. M. Weiss, “Nanoscale porous silicon waveguide for label-free DNA sensing,” Biosens. Bioelectron.23(10), 1572–1576 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. A. Densmore, D.-X. Xu, S. Janz, P. Waldron, T. Mischki, G. Lopinski, A. Delâge, J. Lapointe, P. Cheben, B. Lamontagne, and J. H. Schmid, “Spiral-path high-sensitivity silicon photonic wire molecular sensor with temperature-independent response,” Opt. Lett.33(6), 596–598 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. S. Nacer and A. Aissat, “Optical sensing by silicon slot-based directional couplers,” Opt. Quantum Electron.44(1-2), 35–43 (2012). [CrossRef]
  4. D. Dorfner, T. Zabel, T. Hürlimann, N. Hauke, L. Frandsen, U. Rant, G. Abstreiter, and J. Finley, “Photonic crystal nanostructures for optical biosensing applications,” Biosens. Bioelectron.24(12), 3688–3692 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. Ramachandran, S. Wang, J. Clarke, S. J. Ja, D. Goad, L. Wald, E. M. Flood, E. Knobbe, J. V. Hryniewicz, S. T. Chu, D. Gill, W. Chen, O. King, and B. E. Little, “A universal biosensing platform based on optical micro-ring resonators,” Biosens. Bioelectron.23(7), 939–944 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. A. Ksendzov and Y. Lin, “Integrated optics ring-resonator sensors for protein detection,” Opt. Lett.30(24), 3344–3346 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. C. F. Carlborg, K. B. Gylfason, A. Kaźmierczak, F. Dortu, M. J. Bañuls Polo, A. Maquieira Catala, G. M. Kresbach, H. Sohlström, T. Moh, L. Vivien, J. Popplewell, G. Ronan, C. A. Barrios, G. Stemme, and W. van der Wijngaart, “A packaged optical slot-waveguide ring resonator sensor array for multiplex label-free assays in labs-on-chips,” Lab Chip10(3), 281–290 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Integrated optical sensor platform for multiparameter bio-chemical analysis,” Opt. Express19(14), 13277–13284 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. D. X. Xu, M. Vachon, A. Densmore, R. Ma, A. Delâge, S. Janz, J. Lapointe, Y. Li, G. Lopinski, D. Zhang, Q. Y. Liu, P. Cheben, and J. H. Schmid, “Label-free biosensor array on silicon-on-insulator ring resonators addressed using a WDM approach,” Opt. Lett.35(16), 2771–2773 (2010). [CrossRef]
  10. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Highly-sensitive optical sensor using two cascaded-microring resonators with vernier effect,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, Technical Digest (TD) (Optical Society of America, 2009), paper TuM4. [CrossRef]
  11. D. Dai, “Highly sensitive digital optical sensor based on cascaded high-Q ring-resonators,” Opt. Express17(26), 23817–23822 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. T. Claes, W. Bogaerts, and P. Bienstman, “Experimental characterization of a silicon photonic biosensor consisting of two cascaded ring resonators based on the Vernier effect and introduction of a curve fitting method for an improved detection limit,” Opt. Express18(22), 22747–22761 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Highly-sensitive silicon-on-insulator sensor based on two cascaded-microring resonators with Vernier effect,” Opt. Commun.284(1), 156–159 (2011). [CrossRef]
  14. J. Hu and D. Dai, “Cascaded-ring optical sensor with enhanced sensitivity by using suspended Si-nanowires,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.23(13), 842–844 (2011). [CrossRef]
  15. L. Jin, M. Li, and J.-J. He, “Optical waveguide double-ring sensor using intensity interrogation with a low-cost broadband source,” Opt. Lett.36(7), 1128–1130 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. V. Zamora, P. Lützow, D. Pergande, and H. Heidrich, “Cascaded microring resonators for biomedical applications: improved sensitivity at large tuning range,” Proc. SPIE8570, 857002, 857002–857008 (2013). [CrossRef]
  17. S. J. Choi, Z. Peng, Q. Yang, and P. D. Dapkus, “Tunable narrow linewidth all-buried heterostructure ring resonator filters using vernier effects,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.17(1), 106–108 (2005). [CrossRef]
  18. G. Ren, T. Cao, and S. Chen, “Design and analysis of a cascaded microring resonator-based thermo-optical tunable filter with ultralarge free spectrum range and low power consumption,” Opt. Eng.50(7), 074601 (2011). [CrossRef]
  19. G. Maire, L. Vivien, G. Sattler, A. Kaźmierczak, B. Sanchez, K. B. Gylfason, A. Griol, D. Marris-Morini, E. Cassan, D. Giannone, H. Sohlström, and D. Hill, “High efficiency silicon nitride surface grating couplers,” Opt. Express16(1), 328–333 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. P. Lützow, D. Pergande, D. Gausa, S. Huscher, and H. Heidrich, “Microring resonator arrays for multiparameter biochemical analysis,” Proc. SPIE8427(84270E), 84270E (2012). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited