OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 23 — Nov. 18, 2013
  • pp: 27865–27872
« Show journal navigation

Observation of two output light pulses from a partial wavelength converter preserving phase of an input light at a single-photon level

Rikizo Ikuta, Toshiki Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kato, Shigehito Miki, Taro Yamashita, Hirotaka Terai, Mikio Fujiwara, Takashi Yamamoto, Masahide Sasaki, Zhen Wang, Masato Koashi, and Nobuyuki Imoto  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 23, pp. 27865-27872 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.027865


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (903 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We experimentally demonstrate that both of the two output light pulses of different wavelengths from a wavelength converter with various branching ratios preserve phase information of an input light at a single-photon level. In our experiment, we converted temporally-separated two coherent light pulses with average photon numbers of ∼ 0.1 at 780 nm to light pulses at 1522 nm by using difference-frequency generation in a periodically-poled lithium niobate waveguide. We observed an interference between temporally-separated two modes for both the converted and the unconverted light pulses at various values of the conversion efficiency. We observed interference visibilities greater than 0.88 without suppressing the background noises for any value of the conversion efficiency the wavelength converter achieves. At a conversion efficiency of ∼ 0.5, the observed visibilities are 0.98 for the unconverted light and 0.99 for the converted light. Such a phase-preserving wavelength converter with high visibilities will be useful for manipulating quantum states encoded in the frequency degrees of freedom.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

In this paper, we demonstrate that two output light pulses of different wavelengths after wavelength conversion inherit phase information of the input light with high visibilities. Observed interference visibilities are over 0.88 without suppressing the background noises regardless of the conversion efficiencies our wavelength converter achieves. At a conversion efficiency of ∼ 0.5, the observed visibilities are 0.98 for the unconverted light and 0.99 for the converted light. The wavelength conversion is achieved by the difference-frequency generation (DFG) in a periodically-poled lithium niobate (PPLN) waveguide. We used temporally-separated two light pulses at a single-photon level from a laser source at 780 nm as the input. The wavelength of the photons is converted to 1522 nm with various conversion efficiencies by choosing the pump power at 1600 nm. We observed an interference between temporally-separated two modes for both the converted and the unconverted light pulses. The operation of the partial wavelength converter which splits an input light into two different wavelengths while preserving the phase information is similar to the conventional beamsplitter dividing the input into two spatial modes. Therefore such a wavelength converter will be useful for manipulating quantum states encoded in the frequency degrees of freedom.

2. Theory of an ideal wavelength conversion

We summarize the quantum dynamics of an ideal wavelength conversion based on difference frequency generation (DFG) in a nonlinear optical medium as follows [1

1. P. Kumar, “Quantum frequency conversion,” Opt. Lett. 15, 1476–1478 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 7

7. R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, “Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion,” Nat. Commun. 2, 1544 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We suppose that a signal mode at angular frequency ωs and a converted mode at angular frequency ωc satisfies ωc = ωsωp, where ωp is the angular frequency of the pump light. When the pump light is sufficiently strong, the effective Hamiltonian of the DFG process is described by
H^=ih¯(ξ*a^ca^sξa^sa^c),
(1)
where âs and âc are annihilation operators of the signal mode and the converted mode, respectively. Here ξ = |ξ|e is proportional to the complex amplitude of the classical pump light. By using Eq. (1), annihilation operators âs,out and âc,out of the signal and converted modes from the nonlinear optical medium are described by
a^c,out=eiϕsin(|ξ|τ)a^s+cos(|ξ|τ)a^c
(2)
and
a^s,out=cos(|ξ|τ)a^seiϕsin(|ξ|τ)a^c,
(3)
where τ is the propagation time of the pulses through the nonlinear optical medium. Eqs. (2) and (3) are equivalent to the relation between input and output modes of a BS. The transmittance and the reflectance are |cos(ξτ)|2 and |sin(ξτ)|2, respectively. These can be adjusted by changing the pump power for the wavelength conversion. From Eqs. (2) and (3), the converted light and the remaining unconverted light take over the phase information from the input signal light. In the experiments in [5

5. S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, M. Halder, O. Alibart, P. Baldi, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, “A photonic quantum information interface,” Nature 437, 116–120 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7

7. R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, “Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion,” Nat. Commun. 2, 1544 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 12

12. H. Takesue, “Single-photon frequency down-conversion experiment,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 013833 (2010). [CrossRef]

14

14. S. Ramelow, a. Fedrizzi, a. Poppe, N. Langford, and a. Zeilinger, “Polarization-entanglement-conserving frequency conversion of photons,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 013845 (2012). [CrossRef]

], the phase preservation of the converted light in Eq. (2) has been demonstrated. On the other hand, that of the unconverted light in Eq. (3) has not been observed with a high fidelity [15

15. G. Giorgi, P. Mataloni, and F. De Martini, “Frequency hopping in quantum interferometry: Efficient up-down conversion for qubits and ebits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

3. Experiment

3.1. Experimental setup

The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. We use a +45° polarized mode-locked Ti:sapphire (Ti:S) laser (wavelength: 780 nm; pulse width: 1.2 ps; repetition rate: 82 MHz) as a light source. The light is divided into a short path (S1) and a long path (L1) by a polarizing beamsplitter (PBS). After the polarization of the light passing through S1 is flipped from horizontal (H) to vertical (V) polarization by a half wave plate (HWP), they are recombined by a BS. The time difference of about 600 ps gives phase difference between the two light pulses, and it is varied by mirrors (M) on a piezo motor driven stage. After the light pulses are spectrally narrowed by a Bragg grating (BGV) with a bandwidth of 0.2 nm, an average photon number of each of the temporally-separated light pulses is set to |α|2, which can be varied from 10−3 to 1 by a variable attenuator (VA). Then the light pulses are coupled to the quasi-phase-matched PPLN waveguide [18

18. T. Nishikawa, A. Ozawa, Y. Nishida, M. Asobe, F.-L. Hong, and T. W. Hänsch, “Efficient 494 mW sum-frequency generation of sodium resonance radiation at 589 nm by using a periodically poled Zn:LiNbO3 ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express 17, 17792–17800 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Their frequencies are down-converted to the wavelength of 1522 nm by the DFG using a cw pump laser at 1600 nm which is combined with the signal light by a dichroic mirror (DM). The conversion efficiency is changed by the pump power up to ∼ 700 mW.

Fig. 1 Experimental setup. We initially prepare two temporally-separated light pulses at 780 nm. Their frequencies are down-converted to 1522 nm by DFG in the PPLN. The length of the PPLN crystal is 20 mm, and the acceptable bandwidth is calculated to be 0.3 nm. The conversion efficiency is changed by the pump power up to ∼ 700 mW. After the process of the wavelength conversion, the interference fringe of each of the unconverted light at 780 nm and the converted light at 1522 nm is measured.

After the wavelength conversion, the pump light is eliminated by a high-pass filter (HPF), and the light pulses at 780 nm and 1522 nm are separated by a DM. The temporally-separated light pulses at 780 nm are diffracted by another BGV, while the light pulses at 1522 nm are diffracted by BGT with a bandwidth of 1 nm. The temporally-separated two light pulses at each wavelength are divided into a short path (S2) and a long path (L2) with a time difference of 600 ps. After the polarization of the light passing through S2 is flipped, the light pulses from S2 and L2 are mixed by a PBS. Finally, the light pulses are projected onto +45° polarization, and then coupled to single-mode fibers followed by superconducting single-photon detectors (SSPDs) [19

19. S. Miki, M. Takeda, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Compactly packaged superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with an optical cavity for multichannel system,” Opt. Express 17, 23557–23564 (2009). [CrossRef]

,20

20. S. Miki, T. Yamashita, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Multichannel SNSPD system with high detection efficiency at telecommunication wavelength,” Opt. Lett. 35, 2133–2135 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] which are denoted by DV for the light at 780 nm and DT for the light at 1522 nm.

Electric signals from DV and DT are connected to a time-to-digital converter (TDC) which is gated by a 1-MHz clock signal. The clock signal is obtained by frequency division of the 82 MHz clock signal from Ti:S laser. There are three possible arrival times in the electric signals from DV and DT. The earlest and the latest signals are obtained by the light passing through S1–S2 and L1–L2 paths, respectively. We post-select the 200-ps time windows of the central peaks originated with the light pulses passing through S1–L2 and L1–S2. Such post-selected signals from DV and DT should show the first-order interference pattern of the coherent light pulses at 780 nm and 1522 nm, respectively, depending on the position of M.

3.2. Experimental results

Before we describe the demonstration of the phase-preservation property of our wavelength converter, we first observed the dependencies of the probability of the unconverted events and the conversion efficiency on the pump power by measuring the photon counts of the unconverted mode at 780 nm and the converted mode at 1522 nm. In this experiment, we set |α|2 to ∼ 0.1. The experimental result is shown in Fig. 2(a). From the result, the maximum conversion efficiency is achieved at the pump power of ≈ 560 mW which is smaller than the maximum pump power of 700 mW we can supply. We roughly estimate the internal conversion efficiency in the PPLN crystal as follows. The transmittance of the optical circuit before the wavelength conversion including the coupling efficiency to the PPLN is represented by Tin. The conversion efficiency and the probability of the unconverted events are represented by R(P) and 1 − R(P) = T(P), respectively, where P is the pump power. Note that R(P) corresponds to |sin(ξτ)|2 in Eqs. (2) and (3). We denote overall transmittance of the optical circuit including the quantum efficiency of the detector after the conversion process by TV for the unconverted light at 780 nm. The detection counts of the unconverted light pulse is described by C = 𝒩TinT(P)TV, where 𝒩 is the total number of the input photons. We assume that Tin and TV take constant values regardless of the pump power. By using T (0mW) = 1 and the observed count of C0 = 𝒩TinTV at P = 0 mW, we obtain the dependency of C/C0 = T (P) on the pump power as shown in Fig. 2(b). The best fit to T(P) with 1Asin2(ηP) gives A ≈ 0.94 and η ≈ 0.0044/mW.

Fig. 2 (a) Observed counts of the unconverted photons (red circle) and the converted photons (green triangle). (b) The probability of the unconverted events T (red circle), the conversion efficiency R = 1 − T (green triangle) and the ratio of TT to TV (black square). We derived the curve for T(P) by using the observed photon counts of the unconverted light. The red curve for T is obtained by the best fit to T with 1Asin2(ηP), where A ≈ 0.94 and η ≈ 0.0044/mW. The green curve for R is given by Asin2(ηP).

When we denote overall transmittance after the conversion process by TT for the converted light at 1522 nm, the detection counts of the converted light is given by 𝒩TinR(P)TT. Because 𝒩TinR(P)TT/C0 = R(P)TT/TV and R(P) = 1 − T(P), TT/TV is estimated from the observed photon count of the unconverted light and that of the converted light at each pump power, which is shown in Fig. 2(b). We see that TT/TV takes an almost constant value of about 1.5, which is in accord with the assumption of TV being constant in our rough estimation.

Fig. 3 (a) The interference fringes of the unconverted photons (red circle) and the converted photons (green triangle). These data were observed at the pump power of 165 mW, namely T ≈ 0.5. The interference visibilities are 0.98 for the unconverted light and 0.99 for the converted light. (b) Dependencies of the visibilities on the pump power. The inset shows the enlarged view.

From the experimental result in Fig. 3(b), we see that the visibilities decrease with the pump power more prominently for the unconverted mode. In order to see the reason for the degradation of the visibilities, we measured the background noises from the detected counts temporally away from the three signal peaks. The average noise counts are shown in Fig. 4(a). For the converted mode at 1522 nm, the linear dependency of the noise photons on the pump power is observed, which is caused by the Raman scattering of the pump light for the DFG [7

7. R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, “Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion,” Nat. Commun. 2, 1544 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 16

16. S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, and C. Becher, “Efficient frequency downconversion at the single photon level from the red spectral range to the telecommunications C-band,” Opt. Express 19, 12825–12836 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. On the other hand, for the unconverted mode at 780 nm, nonlinear dependency of the noise photons on the pump power is observed. Such a dependency has been reported in a lot of demonstrations of frequency up-conversion to a visible light [2

2. C. Langrock, E. Diamanti, R. V. Roussev, Y. Yamamoto, M. M. Fejer, and H. Takesue, “Highly efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths by use of upconversion in reverse-proton-exchanged periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 1725–1727 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 17

17. L. Ma, O. Slattery, and X. Tang, “Single photon frequency up-conversion and its applications,” Phys. Rep. 521, 69–94 (2012). [CrossRef]

, 21

21. J. S. Pelc, L. Ma, C. R. Phillips, Q. Zhang, C. Langrock, O. Slattery, X. Tang, and M. M. Fejer, “Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm : performance and noise analysis,” Opt. Express 19, 21445–21456 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. They claim that when we use a pump light longer than a signal light and a converted light, the optical noises are mainly originated from the Raman scattering of the pump light followed by its frequency up-conversion. By subtracting the background noises, we plotted the net visibilities in Fig. 4(b). The net visibilities exceed 0.98 for all pump powers. The result indicates that the degradation of the visibilities are mainly caused by the optical noises from the pump light.

Fig. 4 (a) Dependencies of the background noises on the pump power. The green triangles show the result for the unconverted visible photons. The red circles show the result for the converted telecom photons. The background noise of the unconverted mode when the pump light is off is slightly larger than zero while the dark count of the detector DV is almost zero, indicating that such a noise may be caused by a component of the residual fundamental cw light as a result of the imperfection of the signal light from the Ti:S laser. (b) Dependencies of the net visibilities on the pump power. The green triangles and the red circles show the results for the unconverted visible and the converted telecom photons, respectively.

Finally, we measured the interference visibility for various values of |α|2 with the fixed pump power of 165 mW. The observed values of V are shown in Fig. 5(a). The high visibilities over 0.9 remain for the converted and the unconverted light pulses for |α|2 > 0.01. The behavior of the visibilities in Fig. 5(a) can be explained by using temporally continuous background noises depending on |α|2, which was separately measured and is shown in Fig. 5(b). We assume the noise photons are statistically independent of the signal photon counts. Due to the estimated values of the visibilities close to 1 when we subtracted the background noises from the experimental result in Fig. 4(b), we construct a simple model of the visibilities described by the signal photons with unit visibility and the noise photons. In this model, the visibility is given by V = |α|2Tallf/(|α|2Tallf + 2d), where Tall is the overall transmittance of the optical circuit described by TinT (P)TV for the unconverted mode and by TinR(P)TT for the converted mode. We roughly estimate TinTV ≈ 0.03 for the unconverted mode and TinTT ≈ 0.04 for the converted mode from the observed values. From Fig. 2(b), we see R(165mW) = T(165mW) = 0.5. f = 1 MHz is the frequency of the clock and d is the rate of the noise photons. By using polynomial functions fitted to the experimental result of the rates of the noise photons for d as shown in Fig. 5(b), we obtain the expected curves of the visibilities shown in Fig. 5(a), which are in good agreement with the experimental data. From the high visibilities for |α|2 much smaller than 1, the phase-preserving property of the wavelength converter will be expected to hold in a quantum regime. We note that the noise-photon rates take almost constant values for |α|2 < 0.01. These values are the intrinsic optical noises generated through the DFG. On the other hand, for larger values of |α|2, the noise-count rates increase. We guess this increase may come from the imperfection in the signal light from the Ti:S laser. Because the residual fundamental cw component of the laser is frequency-converted continuously, the effect of the cw component contributes to the constant background photon counts.

Fig. 5 (a) Dependencies of the visibilities on |α|2 when the pump power is 165 mW. The points of the red circle and the green triangle show the visibilities of the unconverted photons and the converted photons, respectively. The solid curves are obtained by using the signal-photon rates estimated from the experimental data and the observed noise counts shown in Fig. 5(b). (b) Dependencies of the noise counts on |α|2. The points of the red circle and the green triangle are for the unconverted photons and the converted photons, respectively. The solid curves are obtained by using polynomial functions fitted to the observed noise count rate d.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the two output pulses at different wavelengths from the DFG-based wavelength converter using the PPLN crystal keep the phase information of the input light with high visibilities. By using the temporally-separated two coherent light pulses at 780 nm with average photon numbers smaller than 1 as the input light pulse, we observed the interference between temporally-separated two modes for both the converted and the unconverted light pulses after the wavelength conversion. The observed values of the visibility are over 0.88 for all conversion efficiencies achievable with our wavelength converter. At a conversion efficiency of ∼ 0.5, the observed visibilities are 0.98 for the unconverted light and 0.99 for the converted light.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R & D on Science and Technology (FIRST), MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 21102008, MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Young scientists(A) 23684035, JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(A) 25247068 and (B) 25286077.

References and links

1.

P. Kumar, “Quantum frequency conversion,” Opt. Lett. 15, 1476–1478 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

C. Langrock, E. Diamanti, R. V. Roussev, Y. Yamamoto, M. M. Fejer, and H. Takesue, “Highly efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths by use of upconversion in reverse-proton-exchanged periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 1725–1727 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

M. T. Rakher, L. Ma, O. Slattery, X. Tang, and K. Srinivasan, “Quantum transduction of telecommunications-band single photons from a quantum dot by frequency upconversion,” Nat. Photonics 4, 786–791 (2010). [CrossRef]

4.

H. Takesue, “Erasing Distinguishability Using Quantum Frequency Up-Conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 173901 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, M. Halder, O. Alibart, P. Baldi, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, “A photonic quantum information interface,” Nature 437, 116–120 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

Y. Dudin, A. Radnaev, R. Zhao, J. Blumoff, T. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, “Entanglement of Light-Shift Compensated Atomic Spin Waves with Telecom Light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 260502 (2010). [CrossRef]

7.

R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, “Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion,” Nat. Commun. 2, 1544 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, C. Keßler, J. Kettler, C. Hepp, C. Arend, R. Albrecht, W.-M. Schulz, M. Jetter, P. Michler, and C. Becher, “Visible-to-Telecom Quantum Frequency Conversion of Light from a Single Quantum Emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 147404 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

R. Ikuta, H. Kato, Y. Kusaka, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Fujiwara, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, M. Sasaki, Z. Wang, and N. Imoto, “High-fidelity conversion of photonic quantum information to telecommunication wavelength with superconducting single-photon detectors,” Phys. Rev. A 87, 010301 (2013). [CrossRef]

10.

R. Ikuta, T. Kobayashi, H. Kato, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Fujiwara, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, M. Sasaki, Z. Wang, and N. Imoto, “Nonclassical two-photon interference between independent telecommunication light pulses converted by difference-frequency generation,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 042317 (2013). [CrossRef]

11.

M. Raymer, S. van Enk, C. McKinstrie, and H. McGuinness, “Interference of two photons of different color,” Opt. Commun. 283, 747–752 (2010). [CrossRef]

12.

H. Takesue, “Single-photon frequency down-conversion experiment,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 013833 (2010). [CrossRef]

13.

N. Curtz, R. Thew, C. Simon, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, “Coherent frequency-down-conversion interface for quantum repeaters,” Opt. Express 18, 22099–22104 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

S. Ramelow, a. Fedrizzi, a. Poppe, N. Langford, and a. Zeilinger, “Polarization-entanglement-conserving frequency conversion of photons,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 013845 (2012). [CrossRef]

15.

G. Giorgi, P. Mataloni, and F. De Martini, “Frequency hopping in quantum interferometry: Efficient up-down conversion for qubits and ebits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, and C. Becher, “Efficient frequency downconversion at the single photon level from the red spectral range to the telecommunications C-band,” Opt. Express 19, 12825–12836 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

L. Ma, O. Slattery, and X. Tang, “Single photon frequency up-conversion and its applications,” Phys. Rep. 521, 69–94 (2012). [CrossRef]

18.

T. Nishikawa, A. Ozawa, Y. Nishida, M. Asobe, F.-L. Hong, and T. W. Hänsch, “Efficient 494 mW sum-frequency generation of sodium resonance radiation at 589 nm by using a periodically poled Zn:LiNbO3 ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express 17, 17792–17800 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

S. Miki, M. Takeda, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Compactly packaged superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with an optical cavity for multichannel system,” Opt. Express 17, 23557–23564 (2009). [CrossRef]

20.

S. Miki, T. Yamashita, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Multichannel SNSPD system with high detection efficiency at telecommunication wavelength,” Opt. Lett. 35, 2133–2135 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21.

J. S. Pelc, L. Ma, C. R. Phillips, Q. Zhang, C. Langrock, O. Slattery, X. Tang, and M. M. Fejer, “Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm : performance and noise analysis,” Opt. Express 19, 21445–21456 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(270.1670) Quantum optics : Coherent optical effects
(190.4223) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear wave mixing
(270.5565) Quantum optics : Quantum communications
(270.5585) Quantum optics : Quantum information and processing
(130.7405) Integrated optics : Wavelength conversion devices

ToC Category:
Quantum Optics

History
Original Manuscript: September 12, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 27, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 28, 2013
Published: November 6, 2013

Citation
Rikizo Ikuta, Toshiki Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kato, Shigehito Miki, Taro Yamashita, Hirotaka Terai, Mikio Fujiwara, Takashi Yamamoto, Masahide Sasaki, Zhen Wang, Masato Koashi, and Nobuyuki Imoto, "Observation of two output light pulses from a partial wavelength converter preserving phase of an input light at a single-photon level," Opt. Express 21, 27865-27872 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-23-27865


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. Kumar, “Quantum frequency conversion,” Opt. Lett.15, 1476–1478 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. C. Langrock, E. Diamanti, R. V. Roussev, Y. Yamamoto, M. M. Fejer, and H. Takesue, “Highly efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths by use of upconversion in reverse-proton-exchanged periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguides,” Opt. Lett.30, 1725–1727 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. T. Rakher, L. Ma, O. Slattery, X. Tang, and K. Srinivasan, “Quantum transduction of telecommunications-band single photons from a quantum dot by frequency upconversion,” Nat. Photonics4, 786–791 (2010). [CrossRef]
  4. H. Takesue, “Erasing Distinguishability Using Quantum Frequency Up-Conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 173901 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, M. Halder, O. Alibart, P. Baldi, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, “A photonic quantum information interface,” Nature437, 116–120 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Y. Dudin, A. Radnaev, R. Zhao, J. Blumoff, T. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, “Entanglement of Light-Shift Compensated Atomic Spin Waves with Telecom Light,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 260502 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, “Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion,” Nat. Commun.2, 1544 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, C. Keßler, J. Kettler, C. Hepp, C. Arend, R. Albrecht, W.-M. Schulz, M. Jetter, P. Michler, and C. Becher, “Visible-to-Telecom Quantum Frequency Conversion of Light from a Single Quantum Emitter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 147404 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. R. Ikuta, H. Kato, Y. Kusaka, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Fujiwara, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, M. Sasaki, Z. Wang, and N. Imoto, “High-fidelity conversion of photonic quantum information to telecommunication wavelength with superconducting single-photon detectors,” Phys. Rev. A87, 010301 (2013). [CrossRef]
  10. R. Ikuta, T. Kobayashi, H. Kato, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Fujiwara, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, M. Sasaki, Z. Wang, and N. Imoto, “Nonclassical two-photon interference between independent telecommunication light pulses converted by difference-frequency generation,” Phys. Rev. A88, 042317 (2013). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Raymer, S. van Enk, C. McKinstrie, and H. McGuinness, “Interference of two photons of different color,” Opt. Commun.283, 747–752 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. H. Takesue, “Single-photon frequency down-conversion experiment,” Phys. Rev. A82, 013833 (2010). [CrossRef]
  13. N. Curtz, R. Thew, C. Simon, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, “Coherent frequency-down-conversion interface for quantum repeaters,” Opt. Express18, 22099–22104 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. S. Ramelow, a. Fedrizzi, a. Poppe, N. Langford, and a. Zeilinger, “Polarization-entanglement-conserving frequency conversion of photons,” Phys. Rev. A85, 013845 (2012). [CrossRef]
  15. G. Giorgi, P. Mataloni, and F. De Martini, “Frequency hopping in quantum interferometry: Efficient up-down conversion for qubits and ebits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 027902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. S. Zaske, A. Lenhard, and C. Becher, “Efficient frequency downconversion at the single photon level from the red spectral range to the telecommunications C-band,” Opt. Express19, 12825–12836 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. L. Ma, O. Slattery, and X. Tang, “Single photon frequency up-conversion and its applications,” Phys. Rep.521, 69–94 (2012). [CrossRef]
  18. T. Nishikawa, A. Ozawa, Y. Nishida, M. Asobe, F.-L. Hong, and T. W. Hänsch, “Efficient 494 mW sum-frequency generation of sodium resonance radiation at 589 nm by using a periodically poled Zn:LiNbO3 ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express17, 17792–17800 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. S. Miki, M. Takeda, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Compactly packaged superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with an optical cavity for multichannel system,” Opt. Express17, 23557–23564 (2009). [CrossRef]
  20. S. Miki, T. Yamashita, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and Z. Wang, “Multichannel SNSPD system with high detection efficiency at telecommunication wavelength,” Opt. Lett.35, 2133–2135 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. J. S. Pelc, L. Ma, C. R. Phillips, Q. Zhang, C. Langrock, O. Slattery, X. Tang, and M. M. Fejer, “Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm : performance and noise analysis,” Opt. Express19, 21445–21456 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited