OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 23 — Nov. 18, 2013
  • pp: 28103–28110
« Show journal navigation

Numerical analysis of transmission efficiency for parabolic optical fiber nano-probe

Wei Zhu, Tielin Shi, Zirong Tang, Bo Gong, Guanglan Liao, and Shiyuan Liu  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 23, pp. 28103-28110 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.028103


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1535 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Theoretical calculations are performed for the transmission efficiencies of parabolic nano-probes with different shapes, based on the finite element method. It shows that the transmittance will fluctuate dramatically with the variation of either wavelength or probe shape, and the efficiency could be rather high even at long wavelengths. Subsequently, we thoroughly investigate this phenomenon and find that these fluctuations are due to the joint effect of light propagating modes and surface plasmon polaritons modes. It indicates that high transmittance can be achieved with the selection of appropriate wavelength and probe structure.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

2. Theoretical modeling

The geometrical feature of the parabolic probe is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematics and modeling of the metal-coated parabolic nano-probe.
with the axial symmetry, where the probe is composed of the linear and nonlinear parts. The linear shape is the curvature with a cone angle of 120° nearby the apex, and the nonlinear shape is the section of parabola tangential to the linear curvature. The cone angle at the input port is defined as θ. The input port fiber diameter Dc is 7 μm, and the aperture diameter Da is 100 nm. The model is constructed in the Cartesian coordinate. Due to the nonlinearity of probe shape, the metallic coating thickness is derived from the transversal shift of probe curvature, which is defined as T of 200 nm. The metal adopted here is the aluminum with dielectric constant taken from Smith et al. [13

13. D. Y. Smith, E. Shiles, and M. Inokuti, “The Optical Properties of Metallic Aluminum” in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, E.D. Palik, ed. (Academic, Orlando, Fla., 1985).

].

As reported previously, the highest transmission efficiency will be obtained through the injection of linearly polarized fundamental (HE11) mode [4

4. L. Novotny, D. W. Pohl, and B. Hecht, “Scanning near-field optical probe with ultrasmall spot size,” Opt. Lett. 20(9), 970–972 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,14

14. P. Tortora, E. Descrovi, L. Aeschimann, L. Vaccaro, H. P. Herzig, and R. Dändliker, “Selective coupling of HE11 and TM01 modes into microfabricated fully metal-coated quartz probes,” Ultramicroscopy 107(2-3), 158–165 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Since the fundamental mode field of step-index fiber is the Bessel distribution with the energy mainly concentrating in the central region. Therefore, we simply define the light source as a Gaussian beam linearly polarizing along x direction with the waist radius of w. Thus the light distribution on the input boundary can be expressed by Eq. (1),
E=A0exp(x2+y2w2)
(1)
where the amplitude A0 is normalized to 1, the value of w is equal to the Marcuse Radius determined by Eq. (2) [15

15. D. Marcuse, “Loss analysis of single-mode fiber splices,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 56(5), 703–718 (1977). [CrossRef]

],
wa=0.65+1.619V1.5+2.879V6
(2)
where a is the fiber radius of 3.5 μm, and V is the normalized cutoff frequency determined by Eq. (3),
V=2πaλNA
(3)
where NA is the fiber numerical aperture of 0.25.

As inferred from Eq. (3), when V is larger than 2.405 with the decrease of the wavelength, the higher order modes are able to be introduced [16

16. E. Snitzer, “Cylindrical dielectric waveguide modes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51(5), 491–498 (1961). [CrossRef]

]. In this study, we consider only HE11 mode since it contributes most to the effective improvement of the power transmission and the effects of higher order modes are neglected. The corresponding Maxwell equations of the model are numerically solved by the finite element method (FEM), and all the calculation is performed on the commercial FEM software COMSOL Multiphysics.

3. Results and discussion

In SNOM regime, the transmission efficiency is defined as the ratio of the output power intensity (Iout) to input power intensity (Iin), namely, Iout / Iin, and the power intensity is equivalent to the Poynting vector. We calculate the transmittances of parabolic probes with different angle of θ at various wavelengths, and the curves are plotted in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Transmission efficiencies for different probes at various wavelengths.
.

As shown in Fig. 2, the transmission efficiency depends on both the probe shape and wavelength, and fluctuates with the change of wavelength for a certain probe shape. With the variation of probe shape and wavelength, the predicted transmittance ranges from the lowest magnitude of 10−8 to the highest magnitude of 10−1. Although systematic investigations on the transmittance versus wavelength have not been experimentally conducted for parabolic probes in reported literatures, there are some experimental studies concerning the transmission efficiency at a fixed wavelength [9

9. M. Garcia-Parajo, T. Tate, and Y. Chen, “Gold-coated parabolic tapers for scanning near-field optical microscopy: fabrication and optimisation,” Ultramicroscopy 61(1-4), 155–163 (1995). [CrossRef]

, 10

10. G. A. Valaskovic, M. Holton, and G. H. Morrison, “Parameter control, characterization, and optimization in the fabrication of optical fiber near-field probes,” Appl. Opt. 34(7), 1215–1228 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. At the wavelength of 633 nm [9

9. M. Garcia-Parajo, T. Tate, and Y. Chen, “Gold-coated parabolic tapers for scanning near-field optical microscopy: fabrication and optimisation,” Ultramicroscopy 61(1-4), 155–163 (1995). [CrossRef]

], the transmission efficiency was reported to range from 3.8 × 10−5 to 6.5 × 10−4 with the tip diameter of 80 nm, while it was in the range of 1 × 10−7 to 3 × 10−5 with the same tip diameter at the wavelength of 514 nm [10

10. G. A. Valaskovic, M. Holton, and G. H. Morrison, “Parameter control, characterization, and optimization in the fabrication of optical fiber near-field probes,” Appl. Opt. 34(7), 1215–1228 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This indicates that optimal transmission efficiency can be achieved by the proper selection of both probe shape and wavelength, which is in consistent with our theoretical prediction.

Moreover, it shows that all the efficiencies decrease gradually with the increase of wavelength on the whole, namely that for every probe, the efficiency fluctuates up and down with a gradual diminishing trend. The highest transmission efficiency of all the probes appears when θ is 70° at the wavelength of 500 nm and the lowest efficiency appears when θ equals 40° at the wavelength of 1350 nm. In order to understand this phenomenon we subsequently investigate the light propagation of these two situations.

Figure 3
Fig. 3 (a) Electric field and (b) power intensity distribution of the central cross section for the 70° probe; (c) electric field and (d) power intensity distribution of the central cross section for the 90° probe.
shows the electric field and power intensity distributions of the central x-z and y-z cross sections.

It is known that the SNOM probe’s transmission regime is the light wave propagation through the hollow metal waveguide filled with dielectric medium [17

17. L. Novotny and C. Hafner, “Light propagation in a cylindrical waveguide with a complex, metallic, dielectric function,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 50(5), 4094–4106 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,18

18. B. Hecht, B. Sick, U. P. Wild, V. Deckert, R. Zenobi, O. J. F. Martin, and D. W. Pohl, “Scanning near-field optical microscopy with aperture probes: Fundamentals and applications,” J. Chem. Phys. 112(18), 7761–7774 (2000). [CrossRef]

], there will be different modes in the dielectric cone with the change of diameter. With the decreasing of diameter, the higher-order modes will vanish and only the fundamental mode propagates in the probe. Subsequently, when the waves reach the region of the cutoff diameter, even the fundamental mode will be transformed to the non-propagating mode that attenuates faster than exponentially [19

19. L. Novotny and D. W. Pohl, “Light propagation in scanning near-field optical microscopy” in Photons and Local Probes, O. Marti and R. Möller, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995).

]. On the other hand, there will be surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) with the intrinsic energy dissipation in the metal layer [20

20. H. Raether, “Surface plasmon on smooth and rough surface and on gratings” in Surface Plasmons, G. Hohler, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

]. Therefore the power dissipation is attributed to the losses of modes in propagation regime, the dramatic attenuation of cutoff regime and the transformation of SPP regime. The cutoff diameter can be estimated through Dc = λ / 2n1 where n1 is the core refractive index and λ is the wavelength [21

21. P. B. Catrysse, H. Shin, and S. H. Fan, “Propagating modes in subwavelength cylindrical holes,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23(6), 2675–2678 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. The cutoff region of different probes are the same except when θ equals 20° with a negligible nonlinear curvature. Hence, the influence of cutoff region can be excluded. We then calculate the transmission ratio of power intensity of the cross section at the cutoff diameter to the input port to obtain the transmission properties of the propagating regime. Although the SPP modes may be excited on the metallic and dielectric interface, the fields distribute mostly on the central area, leading to a limited effect of SPP. In addition, the SPP has its intrinsic attenuation along the interface, therefore its influence on the transmission will not be considered. Figure 4
Fig. 4 Transmission ratios of power intensity for probes with various angles: (a) ratio of the cutoff diameter’s cross section to the input port; (b) ratio of the output port to the cutoff diameter’s cross section.
plots the transmission ratio for the propagating and cutoff regions at the wavelength of 630 and 1550 nm, which are commonly adopted in communication industry.

Figure 4(a) plots the ratio of the cross section at the cutoff diameter to the input port, where the highest and lowest efficiencies are about 0.5 and 0.003 respectively, and the ratios fluctuate with the angle of θ at the wavelength of both 630 and 1550 nm. It is obvious that the probe shape significantly affects the transmission ratio as has been verified by the sharply fluctuations with different angle of θ. In fact, in the propagating region, due to the metal and dielectric interface, a part of light waves travel back after one or multiple reflections, while the others will propagate along the cutoff region. During this process, this region also plays a role similar to a resonant cavity, which is determined by the probe shape and wavelength, leading to the fluctuations of the transmittance. Then we calculate the ratio of power intensity of the output port to the cross section at the cutoff diameter, as plotted in Fig. 4(b), where the ratios also fluctuate at the wavelength of 630 and 1550 nm respectively.

For the highest (λ = 630 nm, θ = 70°) and lowest (λ = 1550 nm, θ = 60°) ratios in Fig. 4(b), we calculate the electric field and power intensity distributions of each situation, and the field distributions are magnified for the region marked with the red frames. Figures 5(a)
Fig. 5 (a) Electric filed and (b) power intensity distributions of the central cross section for λ = 630, θ = 70°; (c) electric field and (d) power intensity distributions of the central cross section for λ = 1550, θ = 60°. The 2D plots are the magnified field distributions of the area in the red frames.
and 5(b) correspond to the highest ratio and Figs. 5(c) and 5(d) correspond to the lowest ratio.

As illustrated in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), the fields in the cutoff region exhibit higher magnitudes compared to the adjacent area of propagating region and are highly concentrated at the aperture. It shows that the fields near the aperture edges are of higher intensities than those in the middle of aperture, leading to a high level of transmission ratio. We attribute the field distribution of high magnitudes in the cutoff region to the penetration of SPP into the dielectric medium, which can be also verified since the electric fields of the cutoff region in x-z central plane are obviously higher than those in y-z central plane. Since the input source is polarized along x axis, the light in x-z central plane propagates like the p-polarized wave which is capable of exciting the SPP mode. While in y-z central plane, the light behaves similar to the s-polarized wave which is ineffective to the SPP excitation [20

20. H. Raether, “Surface plasmon on smooth and rough surface and on gratings” in Surface Plasmons, G. Hohler, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

,24

24. E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Extraordinary optical transmission without plasmons: the s-polarization case,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 8(4), S94–S97 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. On the other hand, as shown in Figs. 5(c) and 5(d), the field magnitudes in the cutoff region are much weaker than the adjacent part of propagating region, and the fields at the aperture are rather weak, which leads to the poor transmission ratio. Under this situation, SPP effect is not apparent due to the ineffective excitation of SPP mode. In terms of SPP, the excitation condition is determined by Eq. (5),
kspp=2πλn1sinα
(5)
where kspp is the wave vector of SPP, α is the incident angle of light wave from the dielectric medium to the metal surface. When the probe shape is changed, α will be changed accordingly, hence, the excitation of SPP is determined by the probe structure and wavelength. Consequently, the fluctuations of the transmission ratio in cutoff region are attributed to the selective excitation of SPP modes.

In general, the propagating regime and SPP modes in cutoff region will both cause the fluctuations of transmission ratio, and are both affected by the probe shape and wavelength. Therefore, the fluctuations of the transmittance are attributed to the joint effect of propagating and SPP modes.

4. Conclusions

We have systematically investigated the propagation properties of parabolic nano-probes, and find that the efficiencies are fluctuated and significantly affected by the probe shape and the wavelength. This is explained by the compound effect of the propagating modes in the propagation region and the SPP modes in cutoff region. In the propagating regime, the fluctuations are derived from the resonant cavity effect of light waves, while in the SPP regime, they are attributed to the selective excitation of SPP mode. This work provides the design guidelines for optical fiber nano-probes in SNOM application, and the highest transmission efficiency can be obtained through optimal design of probe shape and appropriate selection of wavelength.

Acknowledgment

This work is financially supported by National Science Foundation of China (No. 51275195) and the National Instrument Development Specific Project of China (No. 2011YQ160002).

References and links

1.

T. Yatsui, M. Kourogi, and M. Ohtsu, “Increasing throughput of a near-field optical fiber probe over 1000 times by the use of a triple-tapered structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73(15), 2090–2092 (1998). [CrossRef]

2.

B. Vohnsen and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Characterization of near-field optical probes,” Appl. Opt. 38(9), 1792–1797 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

L. Neumann, Y. J. Pang, A. Houyou, M. L. Juan, R. Gordon, and N. F. van Hulst, “Extraordinary optical transmission brightens near-field fiber probe,” Nano Lett. 11(2), 355–360 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

L. Novotny, D. W. Pohl, and B. Hecht, “Scanning near-field optical probe with ultrasmall spot size,” Opt. Lett. 20(9), 970–972 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

H. Nakamura, T. Sato, H. Kambe, K. Sawada, and T. Saiki, “Design and optimization of tapered structure of near-field fibre probe based on finite-difference time-domain simulation,” J. Microsc. 202(1), 50–52 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

X. Wang, Z. Z. Fan, and T. T. Tang, “Study on the power transmission and light spot size of optical probes in scanning near-field optical microscopes,” Opt. Commun. 235(1-3), 31–40 (2004). [CrossRef]

7.

I. Sychugov, H. Omi, T. Murashita, and Y. Kobayashi, “Modeling tip performance for combined STM-luminescence and aperture-SNOM scanning probe: Spatial resolution and collection efficiency,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 254(23), 7861–7863 (2008). [CrossRef]

8.

V. Lotito, U. Sennhauser, and C. Hafner, “Effects of asymmetric surface corrugations on fully metal-coated scanning near field optical microscopy tips,” Opt. Express 18(8), 8722–8734 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

M. Garcia-Parajo, T. Tate, and Y. Chen, “Gold-coated parabolic tapers for scanning near-field optical microscopy: fabrication and optimisation,” Ultramicroscopy 61(1-4), 155–163 (1995). [CrossRef]

10.

G. A. Valaskovic, M. Holton, and G. H. Morrison, “Parameter control, characterization, and optimization in the fabrication of optical fiber near-field probes,” Appl. Opt. 34(7), 1215–1228 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

Z. H. Liu, C. K. Guo, J. Yang, and L. B. Yuan, “Tapered fiber optical tweezers for microscopic particle trapping: fabrication and application,” Opt. Express 14(25), 12510–12516 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

W. Zhu, T. L. Shi, Z. R. Tang, B. Gong, G. L. Liao, and J. Tully, “Dynamic selective etching: a facile route to parabolic optical fiber nano-probe,” Opt. Express 21(6), 6919–6927 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

D. Y. Smith, E. Shiles, and M. Inokuti, “The Optical Properties of Metallic Aluminum” in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, E.D. Palik, ed. (Academic, Orlando, Fla., 1985).

14.

P. Tortora, E. Descrovi, L. Aeschimann, L. Vaccaro, H. P. Herzig, and R. Dändliker, “Selective coupling of HE11 and TM01 modes into microfabricated fully metal-coated quartz probes,” Ultramicroscopy 107(2-3), 158–165 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

D. Marcuse, “Loss analysis of single-mode fiber splices,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 56(5), 703–718 (1977). [CrossRef]

16.

E. Snitzer, “Cylindrical dielectric waveguide modes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51(5), 491–498 (1961). [CrossRef]

17.

L. Novotny and C. Hafner, “Light propagation in a cylindrical waveguide with a complex, metallic, dielectric function,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 50(5), 4094–4106 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

B. Hecht, B. Sick, U. P. Wild, V. Deckert, R. Zenobi, O. J. F. Martin, and D. W. Pohl, “Scanning near-field optical microscopy with aperture probes: Fundamentals and applications,” J. Chem. Phys. 112(18), 7761–7774 (2000). [CrossRef]

19.

L. Novotny and D. W. Pohl, “Light propagation in scanning near-field optical microscopy” in Photons and Local Probes, O. Marti and R. Möller, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995).

20.

H. Raether, “Surface plasmon on smooth and rough surface and on gratings” in Surface Plasmons, G. Hohler, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1988).

21.

P. B. Catrysse, H. Shin, and S. H. Fan, “Propagating modes in subwavelength cylindrical holes,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23(6), 2675–2678 (2005). [CrossRef]

22.

U. Schroter and A. Dereux, “Surface plasmon polaritons on metal cylinders with dielectric core,” Phys. Rev. B 64(12), 125420 (2001). [CrossRef]

23.

S. Collin, F. Pardo, and J. L. Pelouard, “Waveguiding in nanoscale metallic apertures,” Opt. Express 15(7), 4310–4320 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Extraordinary optical transmission without plasmons: the s-polarization case,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 8(4), S94–S97 (2006). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(000.4430) General : Numerical approximation and analysis
(060.2310) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics
(120.4640) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optical instruments
(180.5810) Microscopy : Scanning microscopy

ToC Category:
Microscopy

History
Original Manuscript: August 14, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 31, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: November 1, 2013
Published: November 8, 2013

Citation
Wei Zhu, Tielin Shi, Zirong Tang, Bo Gong, Guanglan Liao, and Shiyuan Liu, "Numerical analysis of transmission efficiency for parabolic optical fiber nano-probe," Opt. Express 21, 28103-28110 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-23-28103


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. T. Yatsui, M. Kourogi, and M. Ohtsu, “Increasing throughput of a near-field optical fiber probe over 1000 times by the use of a triple-tapered structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett.73(15), 2090–2092 (1998). [CrossRef]
  2. B. Vohnsen and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Characterization of near-field optical probes,” Appl. Opt.38(9), 1792–1797 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. L. Neumann, Y. J. Pang, A. Houyou, M. L. Juan, R. Gordon, and N. F. van Hulst, “Extraordinary optical transmission brightens near-field fiber probe,” Nano Lett.11(2), 355–360 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. L. Novotny, D. W. Pohl, and B. Hecht, “Scanning near-field optical probe with ultrasmall spot size,” Opt. Lett.20(9), 970–972 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. H. Nakamura, T. Sato, H. Kambe, K. Sawada, and T. Saiki, “Design and optimization of tapered structure of near-field fibre probe based on finite-difference time-domain simulation,” J. Microsc.202(1), 50–52 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. X. Wang, Z. Z. Fan, and T. T. Tang, “Study on the power transmission and light spot size of optical probes in scanning near-field optical microscopes,” Opt. Commun.235(1-3), 31–40 (2004). [CrossRef]
  7. I. Sychugov, H. Omi, T. Murashita, and Y. Kobayashi, “Modeling tip performance for combined STM-luminescence and aperture-SNOM scanning probe: Spatial resolution and collection efficiency,” Appl. Surf. Sci.254(23), 7861–7863 (2008). [CrossRef]
  8. V. Lotito, U. Sennhauser, and C. Hafner, “Effects of asymmetric surface corrugations on fully metal-coated scanning near field optical microscopy tips,” Opt. Express18(8), 8722–8734 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. M. Garcia-Parajo, T. Tate, and Y. Chen, “Gold-coated parabolic tapers for scanning near-field optical microscopy: fabrication and optimisation,” Ultramicroscopy61(1-4), 155–163 (1995). [CrossRef]
  10. G. A. Valaskovic, M. Holton, and G. H. Morrison, “Parameter control, characterization, and optimization in the fabrication of optical fiber near-field probes,” Appl. Opt.34(7), 1215–1228 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Z. H. Liu, C. K. Guo, J. Yang, and L. B. Yuan, “Tapered fiber optical tweezers for microscopic particle trapping: fabrication and application,” Opt. Express14(25), 12510–12516 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. W. Zhu, T. L. Shi, Z. R. Tang, B. Gong, G. L. Liao, and J. Tully, “Dynamic selective etching: a facile route to parabolic optical fiber nano-probe,” Opt. Express21(6), 6919–6927 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. D. Y. Smith, E. Shiles, and M. Inokuti, “The Optical Properties of Metallic Aluminum” in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, E.D. Palik, ed. (Academic, Orlando, Fla., 1985).
  14. P. Tortora, E. Descrovi, L. Aeschimann, L. Vaccaro, H. P. Herzig, and R. Dändliker, “Selective coupling of HE11 and TM01 modes into microfabricated fully metal-coated quartz probes,” Ultramicroscopy107(2-3), 158–165 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. D. Marcuse, “Loss analysis of single-mode fiber splices,” Bell Syst. Tech. J.56(5), 703–718 (1977). [CrossRef]
  16. E. Snitzer, “Cylindrical dielectric waveguide modes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.51(5), 491–498 (1961). [CrossRef]
  17. L. Novotny and C. Hafner, “Light propagation in a cylindrical waveguide with a complex, metallic, dielectric function,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics50(5), 4094–4106 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. B. Hecht, B. Sick, U. P. Wild, V. Deckert, R. Zenobi, O. J. F. Martin, and D. W. Pohl, “Scanning near-field optical microscopy with aperture probes: Fundamentals and applications,” J. Chem. Phys.112(18), 7761–7774 (2000). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Novotny and D. W. Pohl, “Light propagation in scanning near-field optical microscopy” in Photons and Local Probes, O. Marti and R. Möller, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995).
  20. H. Raether, “Surface plasmon on smooth and rough surface and on gratings” in Surface Plasmons, G. Hohler, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
  21. P. B. Catrysse, H. Shin, and S. H. Fan, “Propagating modes in subwavelength cylindrical holes,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B23(6), 2675–2678 (2005). [CrossRef]
  22. U. Schroter and A. Dereux, “Surface plasmon polaritons on metal cylinders with dielectric core,” Phys. Rev. B64(12), 125420 (2001). [CrossRef]
  23. S. Collin, F. Pardo, and J. L. Pelouard, “Waveguiding in nanoscale metallic apertures,” Opt. Express15(7), 4310–4320 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Extraordinary optical transmission without plasmons: the s-polarization case,” J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt.8(4), S94–S97 (2006). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited