OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 23 — Nov. 18, 2013
  • pp: 28824–28835
« Show journal navigation

Spectral self-imaging of time-periodic coherent frequency combs by parabolic cross-phase modulation

Reza Maram and José Azaña  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 23, pp. 28824-28835 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.028824


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1261 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Integer and fractional spectral self-imaging effects are induced on infinite-duration periodic frequency combs (probe signal) using cross-phase modulation (XPM) with a parabolic pulse train as pump signal. Free-spectral-range tuning (fractional effects) or wavelength-shifting (integer effects) of the frequency comb can be achieved by changing the parabolic pulse peak power or/and repetition rate without affecting the spectral envelope shape and bandwidth of the original comb. For design purposes, we derive the complete family of different pump signals that allow implementing a desired spectral self-imaging process. Numerical simulation results validate our theoretical analysis. We also investigate the detrimental influence of group-delay walk-off and deviations in the nominal temporal shape or power of the pump pulses on the generated output frequency combs.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The spectral self-imaging (SSI) effect, or spectral Talbot effect, is the frequency-domain counterpart of the well-known temporal Talbot effect [1

1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. SSI occurs when a coherent periodic frequency comb (periodic optical pulse sequence in the time domain) is temporally phase-modulated with a linear frequency chirp through either cross-phase modulation (XPM) [2

2. J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or electro-optic modulation (EOM) [3

3. J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 4

4. A. Malacarne and J. Azaña, “Discretely tunable comb spacing of a frequency comb by multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Express 21(4), 4139–4144 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] processes. Under specific phase modulation conditions, the free spectral range (FSR) of the frequency comb is divided by a desired integer number (m) while the comb spectral envelope remains unchanged (fractional SSI). Undistorted wavelength-shifting by half the FSR can also be induced on the original frequency comb (integer SSI). Besides the intrinsic physical interest of SSI phenomena, the capability to controlling key features (e.g. FSR or spectral line location) of periodic optical frequency combs can be potentially interesting for a wide range of applications, such as precision spectroscopy [5

5. L. Consolino, G. Giusfredi, P. De Natale, M. Inguscio, and P. Cancio, “Optical frequency comb assisted laser system for multiplex precision spectroscopy,” Opt. Express 19(4), 3155–3162 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7

7. P. Del'Haye, O. Arcizet, M. L. Gorodetsky, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Frequency comb assisted diode laser spectroscopy for measurement of microcavity dispersion,” Nat. Photonics 3(9), 529–533 (2009). [CrossRef]

], optical frequency metrology [8

8. Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], microwave photonics [9

9. S. C. Chan, G. Q. Xia, and J. M. Liu, “Optical generation of a precise microwave frequency comb by harmonic frequency locking,” Opt. Lett. 32(13), 1917–1919 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) transmitters [10

10. S. Tainta, W. Amaya, M. J. Erro, M. J. Garde, S. Sales, and M. A. Muriel, “WDM compatible and electrically tunable SPE-OCDMA system based on the temporal self-imaging effect,” Opt. Lett. 36(3), 400–402 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], THz generation [11

11. S. Fukushima, C. F. C. Silva, Y. Muramoto, and A. J. Seeds, “10 to 110 GHz tunable opto-electronic frequency synthesis using optical frequency comb generator and uni-travelling-carrier photodiode,” Electron. Lett. 37(12), 780–781 (2001). [CrossRef]

], coherent communications [12

12. T. Healy, F. C. Garcia Gunning, A. D. Ellis, and J. D. Bull, “Multi-wavelength source using low drive-voltage amplitude modulators for optical communications,” Opt. Express 15(6), 2981–2986 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and radio-frequency (RF) waveform generation and clock transmission [13

13. A. Alatawi, R. P. Gollapalli, and L. Duan, “Radio-frequency clock delivery via free-space frequency comb transmission,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3346–3348 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

The first proposal on SSI [2

2. J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] exploits XPM in an optical fiber to linearly chirp the original periodic pulse sequence using the central (quadratic intensity profile) section of a long Gaussian pump pulse. A basic assumption in this work is that a ‘continuous’ (cumulative) quadratic phase modulation profile is needed to induce the desired SSI effects. Based on this assumption and the intrinsic finite extent of a Gaussian pulse, this original approach can be applied on periodic pulse sequences with limited time duration only, greatly limiting the practical use of the method. Recently, the SSI effect has been implemented by EOM using discrete (multi-level) temporal phase modulation of the original pulse train in a periodic fashion [3

3. J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 4

4. A. Malacarne and J. Azaña, “Discretely tunable comb spacing of a frequency comb by multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Express 21(4), 4139–4144 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], which can be shown to be equivalent to the effect of a ‘continuous’ quadratic phase modulation at discrete pulse positions. Despite the relative simplicity of this implementation, its capability is severely limited by the sampling rate of available electronic arbitrary waveform generation systems -needed for generation of the multi-level temporal modulation patterns- so that the input repetition rate is ultimately restricted to a few GHz.

In this paper, we numerically demonstrate that integer and fractional SSI phenomena can be induced on an infinite-duration coherent optical frequency comb using nonlinear XPM with a periodic parabolic pulse train, overcoming the speed limitations of EOM-based methods. Our proposal relies on the fact that the needed quadratic phase-modulation profile at the discrete input pulse locations is a temporally periodic function and as such, a cumulative phase chirp is not necessary for implementation of the effect [14

14. J. Azaña and S. Gupta, “Complete family of periodic Talbot filters for pulse repetition rate multiplication,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4270–4279 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Based on this observation, we derive, for the first time to our knowledge, the complete family of periodic parabolic pump pulse trains that can be used to induce a desired SSI effect on an incoming frequency comb. Free-spectral-range tuning (fractional effects) or undistorted wavelength-shifting (reversed integer effects) can be achieved by suitably changing the parabolic pulse peak power or/and repetition rate.

Optical pulses with parabolic temporal intensity profiles have attracted a great deal of attention for a wide range of applications from high-power ultrashort pulse generation to optical nonlinear processing of telecommunication signals [15

15. C. Finot, J. M. Dudley, B. Kibler, D. J. Richardson, and G. Millot, “Optical parabolic pulse generation and applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 45(11), 1482–1489 (2009). [CrossRef]

21

21. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. In particular, it has been previously shown that quadratic phase modulation of an incoming optical pulse (probe) can be realized optically through XPM with a parabolic optical pulse (pump); this operation has proven especially useful for intensity profile restoration of optical pulses degraded by a variety of linear perturbations in communication links, including jitter, polarization-mode dispersion, higher order dispersion and time-varying dispersion [19

19. T. T. Ng, F. Parmigiani, M. Ibsen, Z. Zhang, P. Petropoulos, and D. J. Richardson, “Compensation of linear distortions by using XPM with parabolic pulses as a time lens,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(13), 1097–1099 (2008). [CrossRef]

21

21. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. Parabolic optical pulses have been experimentally generated with durations ranging from the sub-picosecond range to a few tens of picoseconds using either the intrinsic nonlinear reshaping undergone by an optical pulse propagating through an active/passive normally dispersive fiber [22

22. Y. Ozeki, Y. Takushima, K. Aiso, and K. Kikuchi, “High repetition-rate similariton generation in normal dispersion erbium-doped fiber amplifiers and its application to multi-wavelength light sources,” IEICE Trans. Electron. 88(5), 904–911 (2005). [CrossRef]

24

24. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “Parabolic pulse generation by use of a dispersion-decreasing fiber with normal group-velocity dispersion,” Opt. Lett. 29(5), 498–500 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or linear pulse shaping techniques [25

25. F. Parmigiani, P. Petropoulos, M. Ibsen, and D. J. Richardson, “Pulse retiming based on XPM using parabolic pulses formed in a fiber bragg grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(7), 829–831 (2006). [CrossRef]

27

27. D. Krcmarík, R. Slavík, Y. Park, and J. Azaña, “Nonlinear pulse compression of picosecond parabolic-like pulses synthesized with a long period fiber grating filter,” Opt. Express 17(9), 7074–7087 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The latter has been practical implemented using superstructured fiber Bragg gratings [25

25. F. Parmigiani, P. Petropoulos, M. Ibsen, and D. J. Richardson, “Pulse retiming based on XPM using parabolic pulses formed in a fiber bragg grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(7), 829–831 (2006). [CrossRef]

], line-by-line pulse shaping in an arrayed waveguide grating [26

26. T. Hirooka, M. Nakazawa, and K. Okamoto, “Bright and dark 40 GHz parabolic pulse generation using a picosecond optical pulse train and an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Lett. 33(10), 1102–1104 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or a long-period fiber grating filter [27

27. D. Krcmarík, R. Slavík, Y. Park, and J. Azaña, “Nonlinear pulse compression of picosecond parabolic-like pulses synthesized with a long period fiber grating filter,” Opt. Express 17(9), 7074–7087 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The approach proposed here for SSI requires the use of a periodic train of parabolic pulses each with a pulse time width filling the train temporal period. Such parabolic optical pulse trains, with pulse durations/periods up to the nanosecond range, could be potentially generated by use of spectral parabolic re-shaping of optical pulse trains with the adequate rate followed by dispersion-induced frequency-to-time mapping [28

28. J. Chou, Y. Han, and B. Jalali, “Adaptive RF-photonic arbitrary waveform generator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15(4), 581–583 (2003). [CrossRef]

].

2. Operation principle

The temporal self-imaging effect (TSI), also referred to as temporal Talbot effect, is the time-domain counterpart of the well-known spatial self-imaging phenomenon [1

1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. This space-time duality is due to the mathematical equivalence between the equations describing the paraxial diffraction of beams in space and the first-order temporal dispersion of optical pulses. The TSI occurs when a periodic train of optical pulses with repetition period T ( = 1/f0) propagates through a dispersive medium in a first-order approximation; such, which dispersive medium exhibits a linear all-pass response that is characterized by a quadratic phase variation in frequency, namely exp(iΦ2ω2/2), whereΦ2 is the first-order dispersion coefficient andω(=2πf)denotes angular frequency. An appropriate amount of dispersion, given by the so-called self-imaging condition [1

1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

], leads either to an exact reproduction of the original pulse train (integer temporal Talbot effect) or to repetition-rate multiplication, i.e. repetition period division, by an integer factor (fractional temporal Talbot effect), as shown in Fig. 1(a).
Fig. 1 Illustration of (a) the temporal self-imaging effect using quadratic phase filtering in frequency (1st-order dispersion) and (b) the spectral self-imaging using quadratic phase modulation in time domain (time-lens). F stands for Fourier transform.

In addition to the duality between space and time, a duality between time and frequency has been also identified [29

29. J. Azaña, N. K. Berger, B. Levit, and B. Fischer, “Spectral Fraunhofer regime: time-to-frequency conversion by the action of a single time lens on an optical pulse,” Appl. Opt. 43(2), 483–490 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 30

30. E. R. Andresen, C. Finot, D. Oron, and H. Rigneault, “Spectral analog of the Gouy phase shift,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(14), 143902 (2013). [CrossRef]

]: the function of the dispersion operator in the frequency domain is equivalent to the function of a time-lens operator in the time domain. The latter refers to the time-domain counterpart of a spatial thin lens and is essentially characterized by a quadratic phase temporal modulation of the form exp(iϕt2/2), where ϕ is the linear chirp coefficient of the time-lens process. An important consequence of this duality is the frequency-domain counterpart of the TSI effect, the so-called SSI effect [2

2. J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. SSI occurs when a periodic sequence of optical pulses (periodic comb in the frequency domain) is linearly chirped by a time-lens process. Under specific temporal linear chirping conditions, the input periodic frequency comb is essentially unaffected by the time lens (integer SSI), whereas for other linear chirping conditions, the FSR of the frequency comb is divided by an integer factor (fractional SSI) without undergoing any further distortion in its spectral envelope, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The SSI condition on the linear chirp coefficient can be obtained from the frequency-domain analog of the well-established TSI theory [1

1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

] such that the needed temporal phase modulation function is:
φ(t)=ϕ2t2=±smπT2t2
(1)
where T is the fundamental period of the input optical pulse train (i.e. f0 = 1/T is the FSR of the input frequency comb), the positive integer m is the FSR division factor induced by the SSI effect under consideration (m = 1 for integer effects and m = 2, 3, … for fractional effects), s is an arbitrary positive integer such than s and m are co-prime. We recall that when Eq. (1) is satisfied, the comb spectral envelope is unchanged after temporal phase modulation (time-lens) either (i) keeping the same FSR as the input (integer effects, m = 1) or (ii) with a reduced FSR by a factor m (fractional effects, m = 2, 3, 4, …). Furthermore, similarly to its temporal counterpart [1

1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

], the spectral lines of the modulated comb match the positions of the lines in the input comb when the product (s × m) is an even number (direct effects); however, the lines are additionally frequency shifted by half the output FSR when the product (s × m) is an odd number (reversed effects).

A key observation for the work reported in this paper is that the phase function in Eq. (1) needs to be applied only on the specific discrete times corresponding to the positions of the input pulses, and the resulting discrete-time phase modulation is thus periodic with a fundamental period given by the product mT [3

3. J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. An equivalent property was also previously predicted for TSI [14

14. J. Azaña and S. Gupta, “Complete family of periodic Talbot filters for pulse repetition rate multiplication,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4270–4279 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In the following, we show that the required time-lens process to induce SSI can then be obtained using XPM of the original optical frequency comb (probe) with a periodic parabolic optical pulse train (pump).
Fig. 2 Schematic of the principle of SSI through XPM by a periodic parabolic pulse train as a time-lens. HNLF, Highly Nonlinear Fiber; BPF, Band-Pass Filter. ‘t’ stands for time variable, ‘f’ stands for optical frequency variable.
Figure 2 explains schematically the principle operation of SSI by XPM of an infinite-duration periodic pulse sequence (input periodic frequency comb, probe signal in λProbe) by a periodic parabolic pulse train (pump signal in λPump). Two different fractional SSI effects are illustrated, for m = 2 and 4, which are respectively induced by two parabolic pump signals with identical repetition periods and different peak powers. The probe and the pump signals are assumed to be centered at different wavelengths such that their respective spectra do not overlap. The pump signal is a periodic parabolic pulse train which exhibits a repetition period of Tpuwhich, for the sake of simplicity, is here assumed to coincide with the temporal width of each individual parabolic pump pulse, and a peak power of PPu_peak.

In the proposed scheme, the probe signal co-propagates with the pump signal through a given length L of a highly nonlinear optical fiber (HNLF). Under ideal conditions (ignoring the dispersive and group-delay walk-off effects at first), the pump signal will induce a nonlinear phase shift of ϕNL(t)=2γLPPu(t) across the temporal profile of the probe signal [20

20. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “Optical adaptive equalization of high-speed signals using time-domain optical Fourier transformation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(7), 2530–2540 (2006). [CrossRef]

, 21

21. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]

, 31

31. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2001).

], where PPu(t)is the temporal intensity profile of the pump signal at the fiber input, and γ=n2k0/AEffis the nonlinear coefficient per unit length of the fiber (AEff is the effective fiber core area, n2 is nonlinear refractive index and k0=2π/λProbe). A quadratic (parabolic) temporal phase modulation is thus applied across a number of consecutive probe pulses when a train of pulses, each with a parabolic intensity shape, is used as the pump. The maximum nonlinear phase shift, which occurs at the center of each individual parabolic pulse, is given by ϕNL,max=2γLPPu_peak.

On the other hand, by substituting t=Tpu/2(where the maximum phase nonlinear shift occurs) in Eq. (1), the peak value of the pump-induced quadratic phase shift that is required to achieve a desired SSI process on a given input frequency comb is given by the following expression:
φmax=smπ(Tpu2T)2
(2)
Using the above expression for maximum nonlinear phase shift, we can rewrite Eq. (2) as 2γLPPu_peak=(s/m)π(Tpu/2T)2. Thus, the peak power of the required pump signal (PPu_peak) so as to achieve SSI by a factor m ( = 1, 2, 3, …) can be derived to satisfy the following condition:

PPu_peak=smπ8γL(TpuT)2
(3)

The original SSI theory [2

2. J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] states that a ‘continuous’ quadratic phase modulation needs to be applied over the entire duration of the input periodic frequency comb; thus, the frequency comb was then assumed to have a finite duration. However, more recently, it has been shown that the required quadratic phase modulation is periodic with a fundamental period given by mT [3

3. J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], a feature that was also previously anticipated for temporal self-imaging (Talbot) effects [14

14. J. Azaña and S. Gupta, “Complete family of periodic Talbot filters for pulse repetition rate multiplication,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4270–4279 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This property has been exploited to achieve SSI effects on infinite-duration periodic frequency combs through multi-level discrete EOM [3

3. J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In our newly proposed implementation, we exploit this feature of self-imaging effects to extend the XPM-based SSI theory for application on infinite-duration frequency combs. For this purpose, the pump signal must be temporally periodic with a fundamental period given by Tpu=mT. Hence, the same SSI process can be achieved using a periodic quadratic pump signal with a temporal period given by any integer multiple of the fundamental period, i.e. with a temporal period given by
p Tpu=pmT
(4)
where p = 1, 2, 3, …. Additionally, as discussed above, the individual pulses in the optical pump train must exhibit a parabolic temporal intensity shape, with duration equal to Tpu, Eq. (4), and with a peak power satisfying Eq. (3). This set of design specifications defines a complete family of different pump signals that allow implementing a desired SSI process by simply suitably changing the peak power or/and the repetition rate of the pump pulse train.

3. Simulation results

We have performed several numerical simulations to validate the introduced theory on SSI by parabolic XPM. We assume an input probe signal characterized by a FSR of f0=40 GHz (T = 25 ps), and numerically simulate a periodic train of 1,500 Gaussian pulses, each with a 1.6-ps FWHM, corresponding to a Gaussian spectral envelope with a 275.8-GHz FWHM. In all simulated cases, we assume a typical HNLF with L = 1km, γ = 25 W−1km−1, zero-dispersion wavelength at λ0 = 1551nm and a flat dispersion profile with a slope of 0.017 ps/nm2 ·km [2

2. J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 21

21. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]

, 32

32. M. Galili, L. K. Oxenløwe, H. C. H. Mulvad, A. T. Clausen, and P. Jeppesen, “Optical wavelength conversion by cross-phase modulation of data signals up to 640 Gb/s,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(3), 573–579 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. The dispersion characteristics of the assumed HNLF are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3 Dispersion and group delay characteristics of HNLF.
Therefore, first, we set the probe and pump wavelengths so that they are symmetric with respect to λ0 to avoid walk-off between the two pulses and second, we place them close enough to λ0 to reduce dispersion-induced pulse broadening of the propagating pulses, provided also that the respective spectra do not overlap (λProbe = 1560nm and λPump = 1542nm). Thus, in our simulations, the probe pulses are not affected by dispersion during propagation through the HNLF considering the GVD specifications of the fiber and bandwidth of the considered probe signal. For simplicity, the polarization effects are ignored assuming that the pump and probe signals propagate in the fiber with the same polarization state [31

31. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2001).

]. Moreover, the probe peak power should be low enough to neglect the corresponding self-phase modulation (SPM) contribution. The probe peak power of PPr_peak = 5mW guarantees this assumption since L<<LProbe_NL=1/(γPPr_peak)=8km where LProbe_NLis the distance for which SPM plays a significant role [31

31. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2001).

]. The simulations are based on the nonlinear Schrödinger equation which is numerically solved by the split-step Fourier method [31

31. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2001).

].

Fig. 4 Results from numerical simulations, illustrating fractional SSI on infinite-duration periodic pulse trains, where the FSR division factor is tuned by modifying the repetition period and peak power of the parabolic pump pulse train: (a)-(b) temporal traces of input probe and pump signals and periodic frequency comb (probe) spectra before and after XPM for m = 2 and m = 3, when p = 1. GE: Gaussian envelope of the input periodic frequency comb.
We first consider that the probe signal launched at the input of the HNLF is synchronized with a pump signal whose period is set to Tpu=2T, considering m = 2 and p = 1, as illustrated in Fig. 4(a) , top. The pump peak power is then fixed to satisfy the SSI condition in Eq. (3) with s = 1 and m = 2, i.e., PPu_peak = 31.4 mW. As shown in Fig. 4(a), bottom, the resultant spectrum at the output of the HNLF is a replica of the input spectrum (4(a), middle) but exhibits a FSR that is exactly half of that of the input probe signal; i.e., we observe a spectral line density (SLD) multiplication by m = 2. For comparison, the spectral Gaussian envelope (GE) of the input frequency comb is also illustrated (dotted dark green lines) in all the spectral simulation results to show the fidelity of the Gaussian spectral envelope shape of the output signals with respect to the input one.

We further observe that by changing the period of the pump pulse train to be equal to three times the probe signal period (Tpu=3T) and adjusting its peak power to satisfy Eq. (3) with s = 1 and m = 3, such thatPPu_peak = 47.1 mW, the spectrum of the probe signal at the output of the HNLF is again a self-imaged version of the input signal’s spectrum but with a FSR now reduced by a factor 3, as presented in Fig. 4(b).

As expected, for a non-dispersive XPM operation, the temporal waveform of the probe signal is not affected by XPM; i.e., the upper row in Fig. 4 represents the probe temporal waveforms at both the input and the output of the fiber. It is also worth noting that the SLD multiplication by m ideally yields the same order of reduction in the power spectral density (PSD) amplitude.

In the second set of simulations, we fix the period of the pump signal to Tpu=4Tand we observe that by modifying the pump peak power only, different SSI effects can be induced, namely integer (m = 1) and fractional (m = 2, 4) effects, as shown in Figs. 5(a)5(e). In particular, in Fig. 5(c) the pump peak power is fixed to satisfy the SSI condition in Eq. (3), with s = 1 and m = 1, such that PPu_peak = 251 mW. As predicted, the resultant output spectrum is an exact replica of the input spectrum shifted by half of the original FSR (reversed integer SSI condition).
Fig. 5 Results from numerical simulations, illustrating integer and fractional SSI on infinite-duration periodic pulse trains, where the FSR division factor is tuned by modifying only the peak power of the bright/ dark parabolic pump pulse trains; (a) and (f): Temporal traces of input probe and bright/dark pump signals, respectively; periodic frequency comb (probe) spectra (b, g) before and after XPM with (c-e) bright and (h-j) dark parabolic pump pulse trains for m = 1, m = 2 and m = 4, respectively, with fixed Tpu=4T and different pump peak powers (values given in the text). The dotted green curves in plots (b)-(e) and plots (g)-(j) represent the spectral Gaussian envelope of the input periodic frequency comb.

Subsequently, just by reducing the pump peak power to PPu_peak = 125.5 mW andPPu_peak = 62.75 mW, SLD multiplications by m = 2 and m = 4 are also achieved, as shown in Figs. 5(d) and 5(e), respectively. One can readily notice that as anticipated, the same SSI process for m = 2 has been obtained using different pump signals: one with period of Tpu=2T (with p = 1) and peak power of PPu_peak = 31.4 mW (Fig. 4(a)) and the other with periodTpu=4T (with p = 2) and peak power of PPu_peak = 125.5 mW (Fig. 5(d)).

Similar to TSI, the observation of SSI effects depends only on the magnitude of the linear chirp coefficient and not its sign, as explicitly indicated in Eq. (1). The parabolic pulses we have used so far in our simulations, typically referred to as “bright” parabolic pulses, exhibit positive chirp. Nonetheless, there is another class of optical parabolic pulses, namely “dark” parabolic pulses, which can provide the same linear chirp variation but with negative sign [21

21. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]

, 26

26. T. Hirooka, M. Nakazawa, and K. Okamoto, “Bright and dark 40 GHz parabolic pulse generation using a picosecond optical pulse train and an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Lett. 33(10), 1102–1104 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Likewise, we anticipate that application of dark parabolic pulses as the pump signal will also yield the same SSI results. Notice that a dark parabolic pulse has zero amplitude at its center and reach its peak power at the pulse edges. We replicated the second set of simulations with a dark parabolic pump signal with period of Tpu=4Tand the corresponding pump peak powers used for SSI with m = 1, 2 and 4. Figures 5 (f)5(j) show the induced SSI results which are nearly identical to the corresponding results for bright parabolic pump pulses, depicted in Figs. 5(a)5(e). It should be, however, noted that a dark pulse requires half of the average power of a bright pulse to produce the same magnitude of chirp, since the average power of bright and dark pulses is given by (2/3)PPu_peak and (1/3)PPu_peak, respectively [26

26. T. Hirooka, M. Nakazawa, and K. Okamoto, “Bright and dark 40 GHz parabolic pulse generation using a picosecond optical pulse train and an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Lett. 33(10), 1102–1104 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Fig. 6 (a) Spectral distribution of the probe signal’s spectrum as a function of the pump peak power (SSI carpet), and (b) defined criterion to determine the acceptable power deviation from the SSI condition.
The evolution of the probe signal’s energy spectrum as a function of parabolic pump peak power can be visualized using the SSI carpet shown in Fig. 6(a), an illustration that is inspired from the well-known TSI carpet [1

1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. In Fig. 6(a), the period of the parabolic pump signal is fixed to Tpu=4T. In weaving this SSI carpet, we omitted the empty portions of the probe spectrum between the discrete frequency comb lines, and enlarged the frequency comb lines to be clearly visible. We also peak-normalized the probe spectrum for each pump peak power value.

As can be directly inferred from the carpet, the hopping power from one mode (corresponding to an specific SLD multiplication factor) to the neighbor mode is equal to PMTM=π/2γL=62.75mW, in the reported example.

For any given specific mode, the predicted SSI effect is observed with no distortion on the comb spectral envelope only if Eq. (3) is exactly satisfied; a small pump peak power deviation from the exact SSI condition (Eq. (3) will induce distortions in the comb spectral shape. To determine the acceptable power deviation from the SSI condition, we define a maximum acceptable extinction ratio of 3dB between the amplitudes of the highest and lowest in-mode frequency comb lines, over a 80-GHz frequency range around the comb central frequency, and a minimum acceptable extinction ratio of 15 dB between the amplitudes of the highest in-mode and out-mode frequency comb lines, as shown in Fig. 6(b).

Using this criterion, we estimate that the acceptable range of pump peak power deviation from the SSI condition so that SSI is observed without significant mode-hopping is about 20mW.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that integer and fractional SSI effects can be induced on an infinite-duration coherent optical frequency comb using XPM with a periodic parabolic pump pulse train. We have derived the complete family of parabolic pulse profiles that can be used to induce a desired SSI effect on an incoming frequency comb. Our numerical simulations confirm that FSR tuning or wavelength-shifting can be achieved on the comb, without distorting the comb spectral envelope, by suitably changing the parabolic pulse peak power or/and repetition rate. We have also investigated the effect of deviations in the nominal temporal shape or power of the pump pulses on the generated output frequency combs.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the referees of the original submission, whose comments and suggestions have been very useful to improve the quality and extent of the reported work. This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canada Research Chair in “Ultrafast Photonic Signal Processing”. R.M acknowledges financial support from the Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (MELS) du Québec through the Merit Scholarship Program for Foreign Students.

References and links

1.

J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]

2.

J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

A. Malacarne and J. Azaña, “Discretely tunable comb spacing of a frequency comb by multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Express 21(4), 4139–4144 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

L. Consolino, G. Giusfredi, P. De Natale, M. Inguscio, and P. Cancio, “Optical frequency comb assisted laser system for multiplex precision spectroscopy,” Opt. Express 19(4), 3155–3162 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

F. Adler, M. J. Thorpe, K. C. Cossel, and J. Ye, “Cavity-enhanced direct frequency comb spectroscopy: Technology and applications,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 3(1), 175–205 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

P. Del'Haye, O. Arcizet, M. L. Gorodetsky, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Frequency comb assisted diode laser spectroscopy for measurement of microcavity dispersion,” Nat. Photonics 3(9), 529–533 (2009). [CrossRef]

8.

Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

S. C. Chan, G. Q. Xia, and J. M. Liu, “Optical generation of a precise microwave frequency comb by harmonic frequency locking,” Opt. Lett. 32(13), 1917–1919 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

S. Tainta, W. Amaya, M. J. Erro, M. J. Garde, S. Sales, and M. A. Muriel, “WDM compatible and electrically tunable SPE-OCDMA system based on the temporal self-imaging effect,” Opt. Lett. 36(3), 400–402 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

S. Fukushima, C. F. C. Silva, Y. Muramoto, and A. J. Seeds, “10 to 110 GHz tunable opto-electronic frequency synthesis using optical frequency comb generator and uni-travelling-carrier photodiode,” Electron. Lett. 37(12), 780–781 (2001). [CrossRef]

12.

T. Healy, F. C. Garcia Gunning, A. D. Ellis, and J. D. Bull, “Multi-wavelength source using low drive-voltage amplitude modulators for optical communications,” Opt. Express 15(6), 2981–2986 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

A. Alatawi, R. P. Gollapalli, and L. Duan, “Radio-frequency clock delivery via free-space frequency comb transmission,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3346–3348 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

J. Azaña and S. Gupta, “Complete family of periodic Talbot filters for pulse repetition rate multiplication,” Opt. Express 14(10), 4270–4279 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

C. Finot, J. M. Dudley, B. Kibler, D. J. Richardson, and G. Millot, “Optical parabolic pulse generation and applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 45(11), 1482–1489 (2009). [CrossRef]

16.

J. P. Limpert, T. Schreiber, T. Clausnitzer, K. Zöllner, H. J. Fuchs, E. B. Kley, H. Zellmer, and A. Tünnermann, “High-power femtosecond Yb-doped fiber amplifier,” Opt. Express 10(14), 628–638 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

P. Dupriez, C. Finot, A. Malinowski, J. K. Sahu, J. Nilsson, D. J. Richardson, K. G. Wilcox, H. D. Foreman, and A. C. Tropper, “High-power, high repetition rate picosecond and femtosecond sources based on Yb-doped fiber amplification of VECSELs,” Opt. Express 14(21), 9611–9616 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

F. Parmigiani, C. Finot, K. Mukasa, M. Ibsen, M. A. F. Roelens, P. Petropoulos, and D. J. Richardson, “Ultra-flat SPM-broadened spectra in a highly nonlinear fiber using parabolic pulses formed in a fiber Bragg grating,” Opt. Express 14(17), 7617–7622 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

T. T. Ng, F. Parmigiani, M. Ibsen, Z. Zhang, P. Petropoulos, and D. J. Richardson, “Compensation of linear distortions by using XPM with parabolic pulses as a time lens,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(13), 1097–1099 (2008). [CrossRef]

20.

T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “Optical adaptive equalization of high-speed signals using time-domain optical Fourier transformation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(7), 2530–2540 (2006). [CrossRef]

21.

T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]

22.

Y. Ozeki, Y. Takushima, K. Aiso, and K. Kikuchi, “High repetition-rate similariton generation in normal dispersion erbium-doped fiber amplifiers and its application to multi-wavelength light sources,” IEICE Trans. Electron. 88(5), 904–911 (2005). [CrossRef]

23.

S. Pitois, C. Finot, J. Fatome, B. Sinardet, and G. Millot, “Generation of 20-Ghz picosecond pulse trains in the normal and anomalous dispersion regimes of optical fibers,” Opt. Commun. 260(1), 301–306 (2006). [CrossRef]

24.

T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “Parabolic pulse generation by use of a dispersion-decreasing fiber with normal group-velocity dispersion,” Opt. Lett. 29(5), 498–500 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

F. Parmigiani, P. Petropoulos, M. Ibsen, and D. J. Richardson, “Pulse retiming based on XPM using parabolic pulses formed in a fiber bragg grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(7), 829–831 (2006). [CrossRef]

26.

T. Hirooka, M. Nakazawa, and K. Okamoto, “Bright and dark 40 GHz parabolic pulse generation using a picosecond optical pulse train and an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Lett. 33(10), 1102–1104 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

D. Krcmarík, R. Slavík, Y. Park, and J. Azaña, “Nonlinear pulse compression of picosecond parabolic-like pulses synthesized with a long period fiber grating filter,” Opt. Express 17(9), 7074–7087 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28.

J. Chou, Y. Han, and B. Jalali, “Adaptive RF-photonic arbitrary waveform generator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15(4), 581–583 (2003). [CrossRef]

29.

J. Azaña, N. K. Berger, B. Levit, and B. Fischer, “Spectral Fraunhofer regime: time-to-frequency conversion by the action of a single time lens on an optical pulse,” Appl. Opt. 43(2), 483–490 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

30.

E. R. Andresen, C. Finot, D. Oron, and H. Rigneault, “Spectral analog of the Gouy phase shift,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(14), 143902 (2013). [CrossRef]

31.

G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2001).

32.

M. Galili, L. K. Oxenløwe, H. C. H. Mulvad, A. T. Clausen, and P. Jeppesen, “Optical wavelength conversion by cross-phase modulation of data signals up to 640 Gb/s,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(3), 573–579 (2008). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(060.5060) Fiber optics and optical communications : Phase modulation
(070.6760) Fourier optics and signal processing : Talbot and self-imaging effects
(190.4370) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, fibers

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: September 17, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 29, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 30, 2013
Published: November 15, 2013

Virtual Issues
Nonlinear Optics (2013) Optics Express

Citation
Reza Maram and José Azaña, "Spectral self-imaging of time-periodic coherent frequency combs by parabolic cross-phase modulation," Opt. Express 21, 28824-28835 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-23-28824


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Temporal self-imaging effects: theory and application for multiplying pulse repetition rates,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.7(4), 728–744 (2001). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Azaña, “Spectral Talbot phenomena of frequency combs induced by cross-phase modulation in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett.30(3), 227–229 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. Caraquitena, M. Beltrán, R. Llorente, J. Martí, and M. A. Muriel, “Spectral self-imaging effect by time-domain multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Lett.36(6), 858–860 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. Malacarne and J. Azaña, “Discretely tunable comb spacing of a frequency comb by multilevel phase modulation of a periodic pulse train,” Opt. Express21(4), 4139–4144 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. L. Consolino, G. Giusfredi, P. De Natale, M. Inguscio, and P. Cancio, “Optical frequency comb assisted laser system for multiplex precision spectroscopy,” Opt. Express19(4), 3155–3162 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. F. Adler, M. J. Thorpe, K. C. Cossel, and J. Ye, “Cavity-enhanced direct frequency comb spectroscopy: Technology and applications,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem.3(1), 175–205 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. P. Del'Haye, O. Arcizet, M. L. Gorodetsky, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Frequency comb assisted diode laser spectroscopy for measurement of microcavity dispersion,” Nat. Photonics3(9), 529–533 (2009). [CrossRef]
  8. Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. C. Chan, G. Q. Xia, and J. M. Liu, “Optical generation of a precise microwave frequency comb by harmonic frequency locking,” Opt. Lett.32(13), 1917–1919 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. S. Tainta, W. Amaya, M. J. Erro, M. J. Garde, S. Sales, and M. A. Muriel, “WDM compatible and electrically tunable SPE-OCDMA system based on the temporal self-imaging effect,” Opt. Lett.36(3), 400–402 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. S. Fukushima, C. F. C. Silva, Y. Muramoto, and A. J. Seeds, “10 to 110 GHz tunable opto-electronic frequency synthesis using optical frequency comb generator and uni-travelling-carrier photodiode,” Electron. Lett.37(12), 780–781 (2001). [CrossRef]
  12. T. Healy, F. C. Garcia Gunning, A. D. Ellis, and J. D. Bull, “Multi-wavelength source using low drive-voltage amplitude modulators for optical communications,” Opt. Express15(6), 2981–2986 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. A. Alatawi, R. P. Gollapalli, and L. Duan, “Radio-frequency clock delivery via free-space frequency comb transmission,” Opt. Lett.34(21), 3346–3348 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. J. Azaña and S. Gupta, “Complete family of periodic Talbot filters for pulse repetition rate multiplication,” Opt. Express14(10), 4270–4279 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. C. Finot, J. M. Dudley, B. Kibler, D. J. Richardson, and G. Millot, “Optical parabolic pulse generation and applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.45(11), 1482–1489 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. J. P. Limpert, T. Schreiber, T. Clausnitzer, K. Zöllner, H. J. Fuchs, E. B. Kley, H. Zellmer, and A. Tünnermann, “High-power femtosecond Yb-doped fiber amplifier,” Opt. Express10(14), 628–638 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. P. Dupriez, C. Finot, A. Malinowski, J. K. Sahu, J. Nilsson, D. J. Richardson, K. G. Wilcox, H. D. Foreman, and A. C. Tropper, “High-power, high repetition rate picosecond and femtosecond sources based on Yb-doped fiber amplification of VECSELs,” Opt. Express14(21), 9611–9616 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. F. Parmigiani, C. Finot, K. Mukasa, M. Ibsen, M. A. F. Roelens, P. Petropoulos, and D. J. Richardson, “Ultra-flat SPM-broadened spectra in a highly nonlinear fiber using parabolic pulses formed in a fiber Bragg grating,” Opt. Express14(17), 7617–7622 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. T. T. Ng, F. Parmigiani, M. Ibsen, Z. Zhang, P. Petropoulos, and D. J. Richardson, “Compensation of linear distortions by using XPM with parabolic pulses as a time lens,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20(13), 1097–1099 (2008). [CrossRef]
  20. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “Optical adaptive equalization of high-speed signals using time-domain optical Fourier transformation,” J. Lightwave Technol.24(7), 2530–2540 (2006). [CrossRef]
  21. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “All-optical 40-GHz time-domain Fourier transformation using XPM with a dark parabolic pulse,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20(22), 1869–1871 (2008). [CrossRef]
  22. Y. Ozeki, Y. Takushima, K. Aiso, and K. Kikuchi, “High repetition-rate similariton generation in normal dispersion erbium-doped fiber amplifiers and its application to multi-wavelength light sources,” IEICE Trans. Electron.88(5), 904–911 (2005). [CrossRef]
  23. S. Pitois, C. Finot, J. Fatome, B. Sinardet, and G. Millot, “Generation of 20-Ghz picosecond pulse trains in the normal and anomalous dispersion regimes of optical fibers,” Opt. Commun.260(1), 301–306 (2006). [CrossRef]
  24. T. Hirooka and M. Nakazawa, “Parabolic pulse generation by use of a dispersion-decreasing fiber with normal group-velocity dispersion,” Opt. Lett.29(5), 498–500 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. F. Parmigiani, P. Petropoulos, M. Ibsen, and D. J. Richardson, “Pulse retiming based on XPM using parabolic pulses formed in a fiber bragg grating,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.18(7), 829–831 (2006). [CrossRef]
  26. T. Hirooka, M. Nakazawa, and K. Okamoto, “Bright and dark 40 GHz parabolic pulse generation using a picosecond optical pulse train and an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Lett.33(10), 1102–1104 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. D. Krcmarík, R. Slavík, Y. Park, and J. Azaña, “Nonlinear pulse compression of picosecond parabolic-like pulses synthesized with a long period fiber grating filter,” Opt. Express17(9), 7074–7087 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. J. Chou, Y. Han, and B. Jalali, “Adaptive RF-photonic arbitrary waveform generator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.15(4), 581–583 (2003). [CrossRef]
  29. J. Azaña, N. K. Berger, B. Levit, and B. Fischer, “Spectral Fraunhofer regime: time-to-frequency conversion by the action of a single time lens on an optical pulse,” Appl. Opt.43(2), 483–490 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. E. R. Andresen, C. Finot, D. Oron, and H. Rigneault, “Spectral analog of the Gouy phase shift,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110(14), 143902 (2013). [CrossRef]
  31. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2001).
  32. M. Galili, L. K. Oxenløwe, H. C. H. Mulvad, A. T. Clausen, and P. Jeppesen, “Optical wavelength conversion by cross-phase modulation of data signals up to 640 Gb/s,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.14(3), 573–579 (2008). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited