OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 3 — Feb. 11, 2013
  • pp: 2624–2631
« Show journal navigation

Highly efficient Q-switched laser operation of Yb:Y3Ga5O12 garnet crystal

Junhai Liu, Xueping Tian, Kui Wu, Qibiao Dai, Wenjuan Han, and Huaijin Zhang  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 2624-2631 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.002624


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1212 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We demonstrate, for the first time, passively Q-switched laser operation of Yb:Y3Ga5O12 garnet crystal. An output power of 4.53 W at 1031 nm was generated at a pulse repetition rate of 55.6 kHz, with a Cr4+:YAG crystal acting as saturable absorber whose initial transmission was 97.5%, the corresponding pulse energy, duration and peak power were respectively 81.5 μJ, 28.5 ns and 2.86 kW. Laser pulses at a lower repetition rate of 18.2 kHz were also achieved at 1025 nm while the initial transmission of the Cr4+:YAG crystal was 85.0%, with an output power measured to be 2.56 W, the resulting pulse energy, duration, and peak power being 140.8 μJ, 5.9 ns, and 23.9 kW, respectively.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

Due to its excellent chemical, mechanical, and thermal properties, yttrium aluminum garnet, Y3Al5O12 (YAG), has become the most common crystal serving as host medium for trivalent rare earth active ions such as Nd, Yb, Tm, Ho, Er, etc., to make various solid-state laser materials, in particular for applications in high-power or high-energy laser systems. However, it has been found that in certain circumstances, YAG suffers from some disadvantages; e.g., the thermal conductivity of Yb:YAG tends to drop largely with the increase in Yb doping level [1

1. S. Chénais, F. Druon, F. Balembois, P. Georges, A. Brenier, and G. Boulon, “Diode-pumped Yb:GGG laser: comparison with Yb:YAG,” Opt. Mater. 22(2), 99–106 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. To avoid such drawbacks while exploiting other desirable properties possessed by Yb:YAG, several isomorphic Yb garnets have been developed, including Yb:Lu3Al5O12 (Yb:LuAG) [2

2. A. Brenier, Y. Guyot, H. Canibano, G. Boulon, A. Ródenas, D. Jaque, A. Eganyan, and A. G. Petrosyan, “Growth, spectroscopic, and laser properties of Yb3+-doped Lu3Al5O12 garnet crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23(4), 676–683 (2006). [CrossRef]

], Yb:Gd3Ga5O12 (Yb:GGG) [1

1. S. Chénais, F. Druon, F. Balembois, P. Georges, A. Brenier, and G. Boulon, “Diode-pumped Yb:GGG laser: comparison with Yb:YAG,” Opt. Mater. 22(2), 99–106 (2003). [CrossRef]

, 3

3. B. Jiang, Z. Zhao, X. Xu, P. Song, X. Wang, J. Xu, and P. Deng, “Spectral properties and charge transfer luminescence of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 (Yb:GGG) crystal,” J. Cryst. Growth 277(1-4), 186–191 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 4

4. Y. Guyot, H. Canibano, C. Goutaudier, A. Novoselov, A. Yoshikawa, T. Fukuda, and G. Boulon, “Yb3+-doped Gd3Ga5O12 garnet single crystals grown by the micro-pulling down technique for laser application. Part 2: Concentration quenching analysis and laser optimization,” Opt. Mater. 28(1-2), 1–8 (2006). [CrossRef]

], Yb:Y3Ga5O12 (Yb:YGG) [5

5. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, B. Zhou, C. Xu, Y. Zou, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, and J. Wang, “Diode-pumped passively mode-locked Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3316–3318 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 6

6. H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]

], and Yb:Lu3Ga5O12 (Yb:LuGG) [7

7. K. Wu, L. Hao, H. Zhang, H. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Wang, X. Tian, Z. Zhou, J. Liu, and R. I. Boughton, “Lu3Ga5O12: exploration of new laser host material for the ytterbium ion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29(9), 2320–2328 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. Among these Yb:LuAG has been studied most extensively, from high-power thin-disk lasers producing 5 kW of output to microchip lasers operating in continuous-wave (cw) or passively Q-switched modes, and also mode-locked laser operation generating ultrashort pulses [8

8. K. Beil, S. T. Fredrich-Thornton, F. Tellkamp, R. Peters, C. Kränkel, K. Petermann, and G. Huber, “Thermal and laser properties of Yb:LuAG for kW thin disk lasers,” Opt. Express 18(20), 20712–20722 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11

11. J. He, X. Liang, J. Li, H. Yu, X. Xu, Z. Zhao, J. Xu, and Z. Xu, “LD pumped Yb:LuAG mode-locked laser with 7.63ps duration,” Opt. Express 17(14), 11537–11542 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In the class of Yb doped gallium garnets, Yb:GGG is the first one developed, demonstrating comparable laser performance to that of Yb:YAG [1

1. S. Chénais, F. Druon, F. Balembois, P. Georges, A. Brenier, and G. Boulon, “Diode-pumped Yb:GGG laser: comparison with Yb:YAG,” Opt. Mater. 22(2), 99–106 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. Another member in this garnet class, Yb:YGG, was developed later in 2009 [5

5. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, B. Zhou, C. Xu, Y. Zou, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, and J. Wang, “Diode-pumped passively mode-locked Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3316–3318 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], its growth, thermal and spectroscopic properties have been studied [6

6. H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. In passively mode-locked operation, an output power of 570 mW was produced with pulse duration of 245 fs from a diode pumped Yb:YGG laser [5

5. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, B. Zhou, C. Xu, Y. Zou, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, and J. Wang, “Diode-pumped passively mode-locked Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3316–3318 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]; while cw laser operation was demonstrated with a folded resonator, generating 2.65 W of output power with a slope efficiency amounting to as high as 84.5% [12

12. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Q. Wang, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, H. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Lv, “Diode-pumped efficient continuous-wave Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser at 1035 nm,” Opt. Lett. 36(4), 472–474 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Despite these promising results, however, the research into its basic laser performance is still limited, with some important laser properties, such as passive or active Q-switching, and wavelength tenability, remaining unknown.

In this paper we report on the passive Q-switching laser performance of Yb:YGG crystal, demonstrated with Cr4+:YAG crystals utilized as saturable absorber. Employing several crystal samples of different lengths, the cw laser performance has also been evaluated.

2. Description of experiment

3. Results and discussion

First the cw laser performance of the Yb:YGG garnet was studied in a plano-concave resonator composed of couplers with R2 of 25 mm, the physical cavity length being 24 mm. With each crystal sample laser oscillation was achieved at room temperature with output couplings ranging from T = 0.5% to T = 30%. For the 4 mm thick crystal, the optimum coupling was found to be T = 1%; whereas for the 5 or 6 mm thick crystal it increased to T = 3%. This variation in optimum output coupling resulted mainly from the increasing resonant absorption losses of the longer crystals.

In the cw laser operation achieved with a Yb:YGG crystal of given thickness, the oscillation wavelengths varied only slightly with pump power for a certain output coupling. Shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Emission spectra measured for cw laser operation obtained with Yb:YGG crystals of different lengths at an intermediate pump level (a) and the highest pump power (b).
are the laser emission spectra, measured at an intermediate pump level (a) and the highest absorbed pump power (b) for each crystal. In the case of the 4 mm thick crystal, the laser oscillated in a wavelength range of 1065−1074 nm at Pabs = 5.82 W; at the highest pump power of Pabs = 9.93 W, the emission range changed to 1067−1076 nm. Similar situation occurred also in the cases of the two longer crystals. The oscillation wavelengths measured at the highest pump power covered a range of 1044−1049 nm (5-mm crystal) and 1045−1050 nm (6-mm crystal).

Figure 3
Fig. 3 Emission spectra measured at Pabs = 5.82 W for the laser operation generated with the 4 mm thick crystal, showing the dependence of oscillation wavelengths on the output coupling utilized.
illustrates the variation of the laser emission spectrum with the output coupling, measured for the 4 mm thick crystal in a wide range from T = 0.5% to T = 30%. With the output coupling increased, the laser oscillation was forced to occur at shorter wavelengths, as higher gain was required to balance the greater losses. One sees that in the case of T = 3%, the laser oscillated at 1042−1047 nm, which was very close to the laser emission range measured for the 5 mm or 6 mm thick crystal (Fig. 2). Similarly, the emission spectrum measured for the 5 mm or 6 mm thick crystal in the case of T = 1% also covered a range of roughly 1065−1075 nm. As a result, the different emission spectrum for the 4 mm thick crystal compared to those for the longer crystals, as shown in Fig. 2, was attributed to the different output couplings utilized.

Theoretically, the oscillation of a quasi-three-level laser operating in free-running mode will occur at wavelengths (λ) where the gain cross section, σg(λ) = βσem(λ) − (1−β)σabs(λ), reaches its maximum. Here σabs and σem are absorption and stimulated emission cross sections, respectively, whereas β is the fraction of population excited to the upper manifold. For a practical laser of which the output coupling remains extremely low, e.g., T ≤ 1%, the magnitude of β is very small, usually less than 0.1. Depicted in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Gain cross section versus wavelength for the Yb:YGG crystal, calculated for a number of small magnitudes of the parameter β.
is a group of σg(λ) versus λ curves for different parameter β ranging from 0.07 to 0.045, calculated by use of the absorption and emission spectra for the Yb:YGG crystal reported in [6

6. H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. One can see that as the parameter β decreases from 0.07 to 0.055, the maximum of σg(λ) will shift from 1036 to 1043 nm. Considering the fact that the magnitude of β for a practical laser under certain operational conditions is determined mainly by the output coupling of this laser, one can understand qualitatively the dependence of oscillation wavelengths upon the output coupling illustrated in Fig. 3 for the Yb:YGG laser. It is also seen from Fig. 4 that with β reduced further, the maximum in the σg(λ) curve will become less pronounced; in fact, for β = 0.05, the peak value of σg(λ) at 1045 nm has already become roughly equal to the values for the wavelength range of about 1064−1073 nm; and eventually for β = 0.045, the highest gain will be reached in this longer wavelength range. This explains the behavior of oscillation wavelength shifting from 1042−1047 nm to 1065−1074 nm, observed at Pabs = 5.82 W in the cw laser operation achieved with the 4 mm thick crystal, when the output coupling was changed to T = 1% from T = 3%, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3. As is known, under steady-state oscillation conditions, the gain and hence the magnitude of β will be clamped at some certain value as long as the overall losses of the resonator remain unchanged, regardless of the variation in pump power level. Therefore, it should not be difficult to understand that the laser action obtained with the 4 mm thick crystal in the case of T = 1%, occurring at 1067−1076 nm which proved far from the peak wavelength of the stimulated emission cross section (1024 nm [6

6. H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]

]), produced the highest output power.

To study the passive Q-switching laser performance of Yb:YGG garnet, only the 4 mm thick crystal was employed. The plano-concave resonator was formed by the plane reflector and a concave mirror of R2 = 50 mm, with output coupling limited to T ≥ 20%, in order to prevent any damage to the internal elements. The physical cavity length was 35 mm for the laser using a Cr4+:YAG of T0 = 97.5% or 94.4%, which was optimized experimentally to generate highest output power; it was shortened to 28 mm when the saturable absorber utilized was the one of T0 = 90.0% or 85.0%, in order to obtain laser pulses of shortest duration by reducing the cavity photon lifetime. The average output power, produced under several different operational conditions, is plotted in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Average output power versus Pabs for Q-switched laser operation generated with the 4 mm thick crystal under different conditions of T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%; T = 30%, T0 = 94.4%; T = 30%, T0 = 90.0%; and T = 30%, T0 = 85.0%.
against the absorbed pump power. In the case of T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%, the Q-switched laser oscillation reached threshold at Pabs = 2.05 W. Above this threshold the output power increased approximately linearly with Pabs, reaching 4.53 W at Pabs = 8.95 W, leading to an optical-to-optical efficiency of 50.6%, while the slope efficiency was determined to be 65%. With the output coupling increased to T = 30%, the threshold, as expected, became higher; it was measured to be Pabs = 2.50, 2.53, and 2.56 W, for T0 = 94.4%, 90.0%, and 85.0%, respectively. In connection with the closeness in threshold, one sees from Fig. 5 that the output characteristics of the Yb:YGG laser essentially differ only slightly for the three different saturable absorbers employed, over a wide operational range from the threshold up to Pabs ≈7.0 W, for which a common slope efficiency of 60% was measured approximately. In excess of this pumping level, while the output power produced in the case of T0 = 94.4% would continue to increase, reaching 3.81 W at the highest pump power of 8.95 W; the Q-switched laser operation that was generated by the saturable absorber of T0 = 90.0%, became less efficient, producing a maximum output power of 3.15 W at Pabs = 8.95 W. In the case of T0 = 85.0%, an average output power of 2.56 W was measured at Pabs = 7.14 W, resulting in an optical-to-optical efficiency of 35.9%. Above this power level damage was likely to occur on the crystal surface, due to the high peak power circulating inside the laser cavity. Similarly, the highest pump power absorbed in the crystal was limited to 8.95 W in the cases of T0 = 97.5%, 94.4%, and 90.0%, in order to prevent any damage to the internal elements.

Upon increasing pump power, the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of the Yb:YGG laser was found to rise, which is a typical behavior for passively Q-switched lasers. Depending on the operational conditions, the variation ranges for PRF were measured to be 9.5−55.6 kHz (T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%); 5.6−50.0 kHz (T = 30%, T0 = 94.4%); 2.0−28.6 kHz (T = 30%, T0 = 90.0%); and 0.6−18.2 kHz (T = 30%, T0 = 85.0%).

The energy contained in a single laser pulse can be estimated from the average output power and the corresponding PRF. As usual, the laser pulse energy was found to remain more of less unchanged when the laser was operated far above threshold. From the results shown in Fig. 5, one can determine the pulse energy obtained under different operational conditions: it was 81.5 μJ (T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%); 76.2 μJ (T = 30%, T0 = 94.4%); 110.1 μJ (T = 30%, T0 = 90.0%); and 140.8 μJ (T = 30%, T0 = 85.0%), at the highest output power.

The pulse duration was found to be independent of pump power, it depended only on the T and T0 used. Illustrated in Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Typical pulse profiles measured at Pabs = 6.02 W under different operational conditions.
are typical profiles of the laser pulses generated under different conditions of T and T0, measured at an intermediate power level of Pabs = 6.02 W. The pulse duration amounted to 28.5 ns for T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%; it was reduced to 5.9 ns in the case of T = 30%, T0 = 85.0%. In the other two cases, it was measured to be 14.0 (T = 30%, T0 = 94.4%) and 7.0 ns (T = 30%, T0 = 90.0%). From the pulse energy (Ep) and duration (tp), one can estimate the corresponding peak power by Pp = Ep/tp, giving 2.86 (T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%); 5.44 (T = 30%, T0 = 94.4%); 15.7 (T = 30%, T0 = 90.0%); and 23.9 kW (T = 30%, T0 = 85.0%). The intensity fluctuations from pulse to pulse were estimated to be less than 10%, while the time jitters were lower than 20%.

In Q-switched operation far above threshold, the Yb:YGG laser varied very slightly in oscillation wavelength, which was determined actually by only the output coupling utilized. Shown in Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Emission spectra measured at Pabs = 6.02 W for Q-switched operation generated under different operational conditions.
are the laser emission spectra measured at Pabs = 6.02 W, under different conditions of T and T0. The Q-switched laser oscillation occurred at 1031 nm under conditions of T = 20%, T0 = 97.5%; with the output coupling increased to T = 30%, it would shift to 1025 nm, regardless of the amount of T0 used. It is instructive to note from Fig. 7 that for each case, the emission spectrum consisted of only a single wavelength, with a linewidth less than 0.5 nm that was limited by the resolution of the spectrometer. This stands in sharp contrast to the emission spectra of cw operation illustrated in Fig. 3. During the passive Q-switching process, the absorption saturation in the Cr4+:YAG crystal played a crucial role in the discrimination of oscillating axial modes.

Table 1

Table 1. Parameters Characterizing the Passively Q-switched Yb:YGG laser

table-icon
View This Table
summarizes the primary parameters characterizing the passive Q-switching laser performance of Yb:YGG garnet, in which the additional symbols are defined as follows: Pavr, maximum average output power; ηopt, optical-to-optical efficiency; ηs, slope efficiency; and λ, oscillation wavelength. By a comparison with a Yb:LuGG laser formed with an identical cavity, which was also passively Q-switched under similar conditions (T = 20%, T0 = 97.6%) [13

13. J. Liu, X. Tian, Z. Zhou, K. Wu, W. Han, and H. Zhang, “Efficient laser operation of Yb:Lu3Ga5O12 garnet crystal,” Opt. Lett. 37(12), 2388–2390 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], one sees that while most parameters were very close, the output power and slope efficiency proved to be considerably higher for the Yb:YGG laser; more importantly, the Q-switching laser performance of the Yb:YGG achieved with a Cr4+:YAG of T0 = 85.0%, which was likely not to work with Yb:LuGG, turns out to be much more promising.

With the help of a theoretical model developed for passively Q-switched Yb lasers, which was used successfully in analyzing a Yb:GGG/Cr4+:YAG laser [14

14. X. Zhang, A. Brenier, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Chang, P. Li, S. Zhang, S. Ding, and S. Li, “Passive Q-switching characteristics of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 crystal,” Opt. Express 13(19), 7708–7719 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], we have calculated the parameters of laser pulses generated with the two lower initial transmission Cr4+:YAG crystals (T0 = 90.0%, 85.0%) in the 28 mm long resonator with a coupler of T = 30%. Using the same symbols as in [14

14. X. Zhang, A. Brenier, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Chang, P. Li, S. Zhang, S. Ding, and S. Li, “Passive Q-switching characteristics of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 crystal,” Opt. Express 13(19), 7708–7719 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] to denote the parameters needed in the calculation, we list the numbers for these parameters as follows: σgsa = 4.3 × 10−18 cm2, σesa = 8.2 × 10−19 cm2 [14

14. X. Zhang, A. Brenier, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Chang, P. Li, S. Zhang, S. Ding, and S. Li, “Passive Q-switching characteristics of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 crystal,” Opt. Express 13(19), 7708–7719 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], γσ = 2.5 × 10−20 cm2 (γ ≈1) [6

6. H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]

], tr = 0.20 ns, na0 = 4.0 × 1018 cm−3, L = 0.01, ωL = 70 μm, and ωp = 100 μm. The calculated pulse energy and duration, 117.9 μJ, 5.8 ns for T0 = 90.0%, and 165.8 μJ, 4.1 ns for T0 = 85.0%, are in fair agreement with the experimental results listed in Table 1.

4. Conclusion

In summary, the passive Q-switching laser performance of the Yb:Y3Ga5O12 garnet crystal has been studied employing different Cr4+:YAG saturable absorbers. An average output power of 4.53 W at 1031 nm was generated at a pulse repetition rate of 55.6 kHz, with optical-to-optical and slope efficiencies being 50.6% and 65%, respectively. In the pulsed operation achieved with a Cr4+:YAG of T0 = 85.0%, the output power could reach 2.56 W at 1025 nm with a slope efficiency of 60%, the resulting pulse energy, duration, and peak power were 140.8 μJ, 5.9 ns, and 23.9 kW, respectively. In cw laser operation the output power reached 6.75 W, with an optical-to-optical efficiency of 68%, while the slope efficiency amounting to 85%.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 60978023, 51272131, and 51025210).

References and links

1.

S. Chénais, F. Druon, F. Balembois, P. Georges, A. Brenier, and G. Boulon, “Diode-pumped Yb:GGG laser: comparison with Yb:YAG,” Opt. Mater. 22(2), 99–106 (2003). [CrossRef]

2.

A. Brenier, Y. Guyot, H. Canibano, G. Boulon, A. Ródenas, D. Jaque, A. Eganyan, and A. G. Petrosyan, “Growth, spectroscopic, and laser properties of Yb3+-doped Lu3Al5O12 garnet crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23(4), 676–683 (2006). [CrossRef]

3.

B. Jiang, Z. Zhao, X. Xu, P. Song, X. Wang, J. Xu, and P. Deng, “Spectral properties and charge transfer luminescence of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 (Yb:GGG) crystal,” J. Cryst. Growth 277(1-4), 186–191 (2005). [CrossRef]

4.

Y. Guyot, H. Canibano, C. Goutaudier, A. Novoselov, A. Yoshikawa, T. Fukuda, and G. Boulon, “Yb3+-doped Gd3Ga5O12 garnet single crystals grown by the micro-pulling down technique for laser application. Part 2: Concentration quenching analysis and laser optimization,” Opt. Mater. 28(1-2), 1–8 (2006). [CrossRef]

5.

Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, B. Zhou, C. Xu, Y. Zou, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, and J. Wang, “Diode-pumped passively mode-locked Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3316–3318 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]

7.

K. Wu, L. Hao, H. Zhang, H. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Wang, X. Tian, Z. Zhou, J. Liu, and R. I. Boughton, “Lu3Ga5O12: exploration of new laser host material for the ytterbium ion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29(9), 2320–2328 (2012). [CrossRef]

8.

K. Beil, S. T. Fredrich-Thornton, F. Tellkamp, R. Peters, C. Kränkel, K. Petermann, and G. Huber, “Thermal and laser properties of Yb:LuAG for kW thin disk lasers,” Opt. Express 18(20), 20712–20722 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

J. Dong, K. Ueda, and A. A. Kaminskii, “Laser-diode pumped efficient Yb:LuAG microchip lasers oscillating at 1030 and 1047 nm,” Laser Phys. Lett. 7(10), 726–733 (2010). [CrossRef]

10.

J. Dong, K. Ueda, and A. A. Kaminskii, “Efficient passively Q-switched Yb:LuAG microchip laser,” Opt. Lett. 32(22), 3266–3268 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

J. He, X. Liang, J. Li, H. Yu, X. Xu, Z. Zhao, J. Xu, and Z. Xu, “LD pumped Yb:LuAG mode-locked laser with 7.63ps duration,” Opt. Express 17(14), 11537–11542 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Q. Wang, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, H. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Lv, “Diode-pumped efficient continuous-wave Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser at 1035 nm,” Opt. Lett. 36(4), 472–474 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

J. Liu, X. Tian, Z. Zhou, K. Wu, W. Han, and H. Zhang, “Efficient laser operation of Yb:Lu3Ga5O12 garnet crystal,” Opt. Lett. 37(12), 2388–2390 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

X. Zhang, A. Brenier, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Chang, P. Li, S. Zhang, S. Ding, and S. Li, “Passive Q-switching characteristics of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 crystal,” Opt. Express 13(19), 7708–7719 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(140.3540) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, Q-switched
(140.3580) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, solid-state
(140.3615) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, ytterbium

ToC Category:
Lasers and Laser Optics

History
Original Manuscript: November 26, 2012
Revised Manuscript: January 19, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: January 20, 2013
Published: January 28, 2013

Citation
Junhai Liu, Xueping Tian, Kui Wu, Qibiao Dai, Wenjuan Han, and Huaijin Zhang, "Highly efficient Q-switched laser operation of Yb:Y3Ga5O12 garnet crystal," Opt. Express 21, 2624-2631 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-3-2624


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. Chénais, F. Druon, F. Balembois, P. Georges, A. Brenier, and G. Boulon, “Diode-pumped Yb:GGG laser: comparison with Yb:YAG,” Opt. Mater.22(2), 99–106 (2003). [CrossRef]
  2. A. Brenier, Y. Guyot, H. Canibano, G. Boulon, A. Ródenas, D. Jaque, A. Eganyan, and A. G. Petrosyan, “Growth, spectroscopic, and laser properties of Yb3+-doped Lu3Al5O12 garnet crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B23(4), 676–683 (2006). [CrossRef]
  3. B. Jiang, Z. Zhao, X. Xu, P. Song, X. Wang, J. Xu, and P. Deng, “Spectral properties and charge transfer luminescence of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 (Yb:GGG) crystal,” J. Cryst. Growth277(1-4), 186–191 (2005). [CrossRef]
  4. Y. Guyot, H. Canibano, C. Goutaudier, A. Novoselov, A. Yoshikawa, T. Fukuda, and G. Boulon, “Yb3+-doped Gd3Ga5O12 garnet single crystals grown by the micro-pulling down technique for laser application. Part 2: Concentration quenching analysis and laser optimization,” Opt. Mater.28(1-2), 1–8 (2006). [CrossRef]
  5. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, B. Zhou, C. Xu, Y. Zou, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, and J. Wang, “Diode-pumped passively mode-locked Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser,” Opt. Lett.34(21), 3316–3318 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. H. Yu, K. Wu, B. Yao, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Jiang, “Growth and characteristics of Yb-doped Y3Ga5O12 laser crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.46(12), 1689–1695 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. K. Wu, L. Hao, H. Zhang, H. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Wang, X. Tian, Z. Zhou, J. Liu, and R. I. Boughton, “Lu3Ga5O12: exploration of new laser host material for the ytterbium ion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B29(9), 2320–2328 (2012). [CrossRef]
  8. K. Beil, S. T. Fredrich-Thornton, F. Tellkamp, R. Peters, C. Kränkel, K. Petermann, and G. Huber, “Thermal and laser properties of Yb:LuAG for kW thin disk lasers,” Opt. Express18(20), 20712–20722 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. J. Dong, K. Ueda, and A. A. Kaminskii, “Laser-diode pumped efficient Yb:LuAG microchip lasers oscillating at 1030 and 1047 nm,” Laser Phys. Lett.7(10), 726–733 (2010). [CrossRef]
  10. J. Dong, K. Ueda, and A. A. Kaminskii, “Efficient passively Q-switched Yb:LuAG microchip laser,” Opt. Lett.32(22), 3266–3268 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. J. He, X. Liang, J. Li, H. Yu, X. Xu, Z. Zhao, J. Xu, and Z. Xu, “LD pumped Yb:LuAG mode-locked laser with 7.63ps duration,” Opt. Express17(14), 11537–11542 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Y. Zhang, Z. Wei, Q. Wang, D. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, H. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Lv, “Diode-pumped efficient continuous-wave Yb:Y3Ga5O12 laser at 1035 nm,” Opt. Lett.36(4), 472–474 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. J. Liu, X. Tian, Z. Zhou, K. Wu, W. Han, and H. Zhang, “Efficient laser operation of Yb:Lu3Ga5O12 garnet crystal,” Opt. Lett.37(12), 2388–2390 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. X. Zhang, A. Brenier, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Chang, P. Li, S. Zhang, S. Ding, and S. Li, “Passive Q-switching characteristics of Yb3+:Gd3Ga5O12 crystal,” Opt. Express13(19), 7708–7719 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited