170 W, single-frequency, single-mode, linearly-polarized, Yb-doped all-fiber amplifier

doi:10.1364/OE.21.005456

« Show journal navigation

170 W, single-frequency, single-mode, linearly-polarized, Yb-doped all-fiber amplifier

Lei Zhang, Shuzhen Cui, Chi Liu, Jun Zhou, and Yan Feng »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 5, pp. 5456-5462 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.005456

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1646 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experiment configuration
3. SBS suppression scheme
4. Experimental results and analysis
4. Conclusion
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (17)
Cited By
Figures (3)
Metrics

Abstract

A 170 W all-fiber linearly-polarized single-frequency sing-mode ytterbium amplifier at 1064 nm with an optical efficiency of 80% is demonstrated. 3.9 m long ytterbium-doped polarization maintaining fiber with a core diameter of 10 μm is used as the gain fiber, which guarantees a diffraction-limited output with a measured M² of 1.02. To suppress the stimulated Brillouin scattering, longitudinally varied strains are applied on the gain fiber according to the signal power evolution and the temperature distribution. 7 times increase of the stimulated Brillouin scattering threshold is achieved.

1. Introduction

Recently, high-power single-frequency single-transverse-mode linearly-polarized lasers have found widespread applications in science and industry, such as gravitational wave detection, coherent beam combination, active laser remote sensing, and parametric wavelength conversion in resonant cavities. However, due to limitation primarily from the nonlinear effect of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS), the laser power scaling has been difficult with single transverse mode and narrow linewidth output. In earlier investigations, up to 600 W level high power single frequency fiber amplifier had been demonstrated using bulk free-space components [1

Y. Jeong, J. Nilsson, J. K. Sahu, D. N. Payne, R. Horley, L. M. B. Hickey, and P. W. Turner “Power scaling of single-frequency ytterbium-doped fiber master-oscillator power-amplifier sources up to 500 W,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 13(3), 546–551 (2007). [CrossRef]

–3

G. D. Goodno, L. D. Book, and J. E. Rothenberg, “Low-phase-noise, single-frequency, single-mode 608 W thulium fiber amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 34(8), 1204–1206 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], facilitating the backward pump configuration. For all-fiber single frequency amplifier, 194 W laser power using large mode area (LMA) Yb-doped SBS-suppressing fiber was achieved [4

M. D. Mermelstein, K. Brar, M. J. Andrejco, A. D. Yablon, M. Fishteyn, C. Headley, and D. J. DiGiovanni, “All-fiber 194 W single-frequency single-mode Yb-doped master-oscillator power-amplifier,” in Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (LEOS), the 20th Annual Meeting of the IEEE, 382–383 (2007).

]. A 300 W level counter-propagation pumped all fiber single frequency amplifier was reported with a demanding pump and signal combiner. The backward pump configuration and the applied temperature gradient increase the threshold of the SBS [5

T. Theeg, H. Sayinc, J. Neumann, and D. Kracht, “All-fiber counter-propagation pumped single frequency amplifier stage with 300-W output power,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(20), 1864–1867 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. With high absorption Yb-doped LMA fiber, Wang et al. reported a 310 W all fiber single frequency laser [6

X. L. Wang, P. Zhou, H. Xiao, Y. X. Ma, X. J. Xu, and Z. J. Liu, “310 W single-frequency all-fiber laser in master oscillator power amplification configuration,” Laser Phys. Lett. 9(8), 591–595 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. However, the polarization state of the laser output is uncertain in these works, since the polarization may rotate and drift in non-polarization maintaining fiber.

For many applications, all fiber linearly polarized laser is required. However, SBS gain is higher for linearly polarized laser propagating in polarization maintaining (PM) fiber [1

]. Therefore, power scaling of linearly polarized narrow linewidth fiber amplifier is even more difficult. Up to 174 W polarized output had been achieved through heating of the fiber and optimizing the fiber length [7

D. P. Machewirth, Q. Wang, B. Samson, K. Tankala, M. O'Connor, and M. Alam, “Current developments in high-power monolithic polarization maintaining fiber amplifiers for coherent beam combining applications,” Proc. SPIE 6453, Fiber Lasers IV: Technology, Systems, and Applications, 64531F–64531F (2007).

]. Using the gain competition method, Zeringue et al. reported a 203 W single frequency all fiber linearly polarized amplifier [8

C. Zeringue, C. Vergien, and I. Dajani, “Pump-limited, 203 W, single-frequency monolithic fiber amplifier based on laser gain competition,” Opt. Lett. 36(5), 618–620 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, multimode ytterbium-doped fibers have been used in these studies.

In this paper, we report a 170 W all-fiber linearly-polarized single frequency fiber amplifier with a 10 μm-core single-transverse-mode PM ytterbium-doped fiber. We design and apply a strain distribution along the gain fiber according to the signal power evolution and the temperature distribution to suppress the SBS effect. 7 times increase of SBS threshold is achieved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest output from a single-frequency true-single-mode PM all-fiber amplifier. The SBS suppression technique can be applied to amplifiers with larger mode area fibers, so as to further scale the single frequency output power.

2. Experiment configuration

The experimental configuration of single frequency amplifier is illustrated in Fig. 1 . A commercial NPRO laser (Innolight Mephisto) is used as seed, which can generate up to 50 mW, ~1 kHz bandwidth, linearly polarized fiber-coupled laser at 1064 nm according to the datasheet. The seed is amplified by two preamplifier stages and a power scaling stage, which are built with all-fiber PM components. The seed light is amplified up to 3 W by the first two stages using Nufern 5/130 μm PM YDF and Nufern 10/125 μm PM YDF as the gain fibers, respectively. High power PM isolators are inserted between the adjacent amplifiers to prevent parasitic oscillation. A 1% diagnostic tap coupler is placed before the 3rd stage to monitor the backscattered optical power and the spectrum. The signal light is combined with the pump light by a PM (6 + 1) × 1 combiner and the 976 nm pump light is provided by ten 25 W laser diode. However, due to the coupling efficiency of the 2 × 1 combiners and (6 + 1) × 1 combiner, the measured available pump power is 210 W after the combiner. The gain fiber for the last stage amplifier is 3.9 m PLMA-YDF-10/125 fiber (Nufern) with a core diameter of 10 μm, a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.075, and nominal cladding absorption of 4.8 dB/m at 976 nm. 10 and 20 steps of longitudinal varied strain (details in section 3) are applied onto the gain fiber to suppress the SBS in two separate experiments. The output fiber is cleaved with an angle of 8° to suppress the parasitic oscillation. A dichroic mirror at the output port is used to separate the signal light from the pump light.

Fig. 1 Experimental configuration of the 1064 nm single frequency Yb-doped fiber amplifier

3. SBS suppression scheme

3.1 Longitudinally varied strain for SBS suppression

SBS suppression by applying strain distribution along fiber is well known [9

J. M. C. Boggio, J. D. Marconi, and H. L. Fragnito, “Experimental and numerical investigation of the SBS-threshold increase in an optical fiber by applying strain distributions,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(11), 3808–3814 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. However, most of the studies focused on narrow linewidth laser transmission in passive fibers. In high gain fiber amplifiers, the power distribution along the fiber is very uneven. To effectively suppress SBS, a clever design of strain distribution is necessary. In high power single frequency Raman fiber amplifier, 20 times reduction in effective stimulated Brillouin scattering coefficient was achieved by 30 steps of longitudinally varied strain [10

L. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Wang, and Y. Feng, “Stimulated-Brillouin-scattering-suppressed high-power single-frequency polarization-maintaining Raman fiber amplifier with longitudinally varied strain for laser guide star,” Opt. Lett. 37(22), 4796–4798 (2012). [PubMed]

We focus on step-wise strain distribution. This means each step contains a piece of fiber with uniform strain. SBS gain spectra of different fiber segments are shifted, but still have some overlap to each other, depending on the difference of applied tensile strain. With a given step number, the best SBS suppression happens when each strain step sees the same SBS light generation at different frequency shift. This can be achieved by adjusting the individual step lengths, since SBS gain is an integration along the fiber length. A standard differential equation model is built for calculating the laser power distribution along the fiber and estimating SBS gain. Considering Yb fiber amplifier with pump going from left, seeded from left, so SBS light propagates from right to left, the equations read [11

A. Liu, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in single-frequency fiber amplifiers with delivery fibers,” Opt. Express 17(17), 15201–15209 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

\begin{array}{l} \frac{d P_{p}}{d x} = (N_{2} σ_{p}^{e} - N_{1} σ_{p}^{a}) Γ_{p} P_{p} - α_{p} P_{p} \\ \frac{d P_{s}}{d x} = (N_{2} σ_{s}^{e} - N_{1} σ_{s}^{a}) Γ_{s} P_{s} - α_{s} P_{s} - P_{s} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} g_{S B S}^{i} P_{S B S}^{i} \\ \frac{d P_{S B S}^{i}}{d x} = - g_{S B S}^{i} P_{s} P_{S B S}^{i} + α_{S B S} P_{S B S}^{i} + (N_{2} σ_{s}^{e} - N_{1} σ_{s}^{a}) Γ_{s} P_{S B S}^{i} \end{array}

(1)

Where P_P and P_S are powers of pump light and signal light, respectively. x is the location along the fiber.

σ_{p}^{e}

and

σ_{p}^{a}

are the emission and absorption cross-sections for the 975 nm pump light, which are 2.15 × 10⁻²⁴ m² and 2.35 × 10⁻²⁴ m².

σ_{s}^{e}

and

σ_{s}^{a}

are the emission and absorption cross-sections for the 1064 nm signal light, which are 2.5 × 10⁻²⁵ m² and 2.95 × 10⁻²⁷ m².

Γ_{P}

and

Γ_{S}

are the overlap factors between the light-field modes and the Yb distribution, which are 6.4 × 10⁻³ and 0.69. The SBS light is considered by dividing into spectral channels with a frequency bin size of 2 MHz.

P_{S B S}^{i}

is the i-th Brillouin wave power, while

g_{S B S}^{i}

is the SBS gain coefficient at the corresponding frequency, which is a function of fiber location x. SBS gain spectrum at any location is assumed to have a Lorentz shape with a peak gain coefficient of 0.125 m⁻¹W⁻¹ and a bandwidth of 60 MHz. However, the center frequency varies along the fiber due to the strain and temperature distribution.

α_{p}

α_{s}

and

α_{S B S}

are loss coefficient of pump, signal and SBS light in fiber, which are 0.09 m⁻¹, 0.046 m⁻¹ and 0.046 m⁻¹, respectively. The initiation of SBS light is considered following the method in [12

C. Vergien, I. Dajani, and C. Zeringue, “Theoretical analysis of single-frequency Raman fiber amplifier system operating at 1178 nm,” Opt. Express 18(25), 26214–26228 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We come to a configuration with 3.7 m of fiber and 20 strain steps separated by 80 MHz. Aiming an output power of ~170 W seeded by 3 W and pump power of 210 W, an optimum strain step distribution is calculated as shown in Fig. 2(a) , which depicts the calculated signal power and the strain distribution along the gain fiber.

Fig. 2 (a) Calculated signal power evolution and designed strain distribution along the fiber. (b) Calculated SBS light spectrum under the strain distribution. (c) Calculated pump power, signal power and temperature distribution along the gain fiber. (d) Calculated SBS light spectrum considering both the strain and temperature distribution.

3.2 Contribution of temperature distribution

The previous investigations indicated that temperature distribution along the fiber played a significant role in influencing the SBS spectrum in high power single frequency amplifier [1

]. In our experiment, the high pump power (210 W), the high absorption of the gain fiber (4.8 dB/m) and the small fiber cladding diameter of 125 μm cause a high temperature rise. So the temperature distribution must be taken into consideration to achieve a synergistic effect with the designed strain distribution to suppress the SBS. The temperature distribution along the gain fiber is calculated according to [13

Y. Fan, B. He, J. Zhou, J. Zheng, H. Liu, Y. Wei, J. Dong, and Q. Lou, “Thermal effects in kilowatt all-fiber MOPA,” Opt. Express 19(16), 15162–15172 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

T_{0} = T_{c} + \frac{q a^{2}}{2 h c} + \frac{q a^{2}}{4 k_{1}} + \frac{q a^{2}}{2 k_{2}} \ln (\frac{b}{a}) + \frac{q a^{2}}{2 k_{3}} \ln (\frac{c}{b})

(2)

q = (1 - \frac{λ_{p}}{λ_{s}}) \frac{-d P_{P}}{d x} \frac{1}{π a^{2}}

(3)

where T₀ is the temperature at the center of the fiber core, T_c is the ambient temperature which is 290 K in our experiment, q is the dissipated heat per unit volume as is defined in Eq. (3), where

λ_{p}

and

λ_{s}

are the wavelengths of the pump light and signal light, and equal to 975 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. The quantum defect of the laser is assumed to be the only source of the thermal load. In our experiment, the gain fibers are spooled on an aluminum metal tube. Two electric fans are used to blow the metal tube to dissipate the heat generated by the laser system. Therefore, the convective heat transfer coefficient h is defined to be 100 W/(m²·K) in the simulation [14

I. Dajani, C. Vergien, C. Robin, and C. Zeringue, “Experimental and theoretical investigations of photonic crystal fiber amplifier with 260 W output,” Opt. Express 17(26), 24317–24333 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The core radius a, inner cladding radius b and outer cladding radius c are 5 μm, 62.5 μm and 125 μm, respectively. k₁, k₂ and k₃ are thermal conductivities of core, inner cladding and outer polymer region, which take values of k₁ = k₂ = 1.38 W/(m·K), k₃ = 0.2 W/(m·K). The pump and signal light power distribution along the fiber length is calculated by Eq. (1). As is depicted in Fig. 2(c), the calculated temperature is 336 K at the input end of the gain fiber, and then increases to 422 K at 0.7 m from the input end. This is due to improved pump absorption when the signal power increases. Along the remaining gain fiber, the temperature decreases gradually to 300 K at the output end of the gain fiber because the pump power decreases. Providing the SBS frequency shift with temperature is 1.36 MHz/degree [15

M. Nikles, L. Thevenaz, and P. A. Robert, “Brillouin gain spectrum characterization in single-mode optical fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 15(10), 1842–1851 (1997). [CrossRef]

], 166 MHz SBS shift is generated by the temperature differences along the last 3.2 m gain fiber, where the signal power is much higher than in the 0.7 m gain fiber at the input end. So it is important to take the temperature distribution into consideration. Unlike what we did in single frequency Raman amplifier [10

], now we apply the maximum strain to the input end of the gain fiber, and then make a step-decreasing strain distribution, to achieve a synergistic effect with the designed strain distribution.

3.3 SBS suppression

Based on the analysis above, we spool the fiber on a metallic drum with variable strains. Starting from the seed side of the gain fiber, the tension decreases by 100 g successively until the 19th step. The 20th step is unstrained as output fiber. Using the tool provided by Corning [16

Corning. Inc., http://www.corning.com/opticalfiber/library/fiber_mechanical_reliability/calculators.aspx.

], the strain on each segments can be calculated. Then the shift of Brillouin gain spectrum peak can be estimated with a formula [17

T. Horiguchi, K. Shimizu, T. Kurashima, M. Tateda, and Y. Koyamada, “Development of a distributed sensing technique using Brillouin scattering,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(7), 1296–1302 (1995). [CrossRef]

ν_{B} (ε) = ν_{B} (0) [1 + C_{S} ε]

(5)

where

ν_{B} (0)

is the SBS shift at zero strain which is about 16.0 GHz,

ε

is the amount of applied strain, and coefficient C_S is about 4.6%⁻¹. The detailed results are shown in Table 1 .

Table 1 Applied Strain Distribution and the Corresponding SBS Shifts

Step	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Length [m]	0.79	0.287	0.222	0.191	0.174	0.162	0.154	0.148	0.143	0.139
Strain [%]	2.27	2.16	2.06	1.96	1.86	1.76	1.65	1.55	1.44	1.34
SBS shift by Strain [MHz]	1671	1590	1516	1442	1369	1295	1214	1141	1060	986
SBS shift by Temperature [MHz]	146	172	148	125	107	91	78	67	58	50
Total SBS shift [MHz]	1817	1762	1664	1567	1476	1386	1292	1208	1118	1036
Step	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
Length [m]	0.136	0.134	0.132	0.130	0.129	0.128	0.127	0.126	0.125	0.124
Strain [%]	1.23	1.12	1.02	0.91	0.80	0.69	0.58	0.47	0.36	0
SBS shift by strain[MHz]	905	824	751	670	589	508	427	346	265	0
SBS shift by Temperature [MHz]	43	38	33	28	25	22	19	16	14	12
Total SBS shift [MHz]	948	862	784	698	614	530	446	362	279	12

Figure 2(b) shows the calculated SBS output spectrum in the amplifier under the strain distribution. Twenty peaks are shown in the SBS spectrum and broaden the spectrum from 60 MHz to 1.6 GHz. The calculated SBS spectrum considering both the temperature and strain effect is shown in Fig. 2(d). Compared to Fig. 2(b), the SBS spectrum is broadened further. And as a result the amplitude of each frequency decreases.

4. Experimental results and analysis

In the first round of experiments, 3.4 m and 3.6 m 10/130 YDF with identical 10-step strain distribution (125 g per stage, the maximum strain is 1.5%, design length of the last step is 0.20 m) are used as the gain fiber, while the lengths of the last unstrained fiber segments are 0.2 m and 0.4 m, respectively. Six 25 W 976 nm diode lasers are spliced directly to the combiner to pump the amplifier. When the signal light power is 2 W, the output power curves are shown in Fig. 3(a) . For the 3.4 m gain fiber, a maximum 127 W laser output is achieved at the full pump power. The power of the backward propagating light is 7.5 mW, corresponding to 0.06 ‰ of the output power. However, for the 3.6 m gain fiber with 0.4 m output fiber segment, when the output power reaches 117 W, the backward light starts to increase quickly to 38 mW and limits the amplifier output. The result shows the importance of the precision of the strain distribution.

Fig. 3 (a) Output and backward light power for the cases of 3.4 and 3.6 m gain fiber with 10 strain steps. (b) Output and backward light power for the cases of 3.9 m gain fiber without strain and with 20 strain steps, inset, far field spatial profile of the 1064 nm beam. (c) Spectrum at the maximum output power, inset, zoom-in view of the laser emission at 1064 nm. (d) Backward light spectra at different output power.

In a higher power experiment, a 3.9 m-long 10/125 fiber with 20 strain steps is used as gain fiber. The strain distribution is described in Tab. 1. However, for experimental convenience, the last unstrained output fiber is 20 cm, which is higher than the designed 12.4 cm. And there is another unstrained 10 cm Yb fiber used for fusion with the combiner at the start of the input gain fiber. As depicted in Fig. 3(b), the maximum output power and the backward light power are 171 W and 31.6 mW (0.21‰ of the output power), respectively, limited by the available pump power. The corresponding optical efficiency is 81%. For comparison, we tested a 3.9 m unstrained fiber as the gain fiber. The maximum output power is 24.5 W and the backward light increases quickly to be 38 mW. Therefore, the SBS threshold is improved by 7 times.

The spectra of the 1064 nm signal light are measured with an optical spectrum analyzer (AQ 6370, Yakogawa) and shown in Fig. 3(c). A signal to ASE ratio of > 50 dB is measured at full output. Figure 3(d) shows the backward light spectra at different output powers. It is seen that the backward light consists of Rayleigh scattering of the laser and the SBS light. The SBS light at the highest laser output is 7.8 dB higher than the Rayleigh scattering. A polarization extinction ratio (PER) of > 20 dB and a M² factor of 1.02 are measured at an output power of 30 W. Measurement at higher power is limited by the setup. A far field spatial profile is show in the inset of the Fig. 3(b).

4. Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated a 171 W all-fiber single-frequency single-mode polarization maintaining Yb-doped amplifier, which is the record-high single-frequency output for a gain fiber of 10 μm core. A numerical model including both the strain and temperature is developed to simulate the SBS generation in single frequency Yb doped fiber amplifier. The designed stepwise strain distribution is applied to the gain fiber and 7 times increase of SBS threshold is demonstrated experimentally. The SBS suppression technique can be applied to fibers with larger mode area, which is the natural path for further power scaling.

References and links

1.	Y. Jeong, J. Nilsson, J. K. Sahu, D. N. Payne, R. Horley, L. M. B. Hickey, and P. W. Turner “Power scaling of single-frequency ytterbium-doped fiber master-oscillator power-amplifier sources up to 500 W,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 13(3), 546–551 (2007). [CrossRef]
2.	S. Gray, A. Liu, D. T. Walton, J. Wang, M.-J. Li, X. Chen, A. B. Ruffin, J. A. Demeritt, and L. A. Zenteno, “502 Watt, single transverse mode, narrow linewidth, bidirectionally pumped Yb-doped fiber amplifier,” Opt. Express 15(25), 17044–17050 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.	G. D. Goodno, L. D. Book, and J. E. Rothenberg, “Low-phase-noise, single-frequency, single-mode 608 W thulium fiber amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 34(8), 1204–1206 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.	M. D. Mermelstein, K. Brar, M. J. Andrejco, A. D. Yablon, M. Fishteyn, C. Headley, and D. J. DiGiovanni, “All-fiber 194 W single-frequency single-mode Yb-doped master-oscillator power-amplifier,” in Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (LEOS), the 20th Annual Meeting of the IEEE, 382–383 (2007).
5.	T. Theeg, H. Sayinc, J. Neumann, and D. Kracht, “All-fiber counter-propagation pumped single frequency amplifier stage with 300-W output power,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(20), 1864–1867 (2012). [CrossRef]
6.	X. L. Wang, P. Zhou, H. Xiao, Y. X. Ma, X. J. Xu, and Z. J. Liu, “310 W single-frequency all-fiber laser in master oscillator power amplification configuration,” Laser Phys. Lett. 9(8), 591–595 (2012). [CrossRef]
7.	D. P. Machewirth, Q. Wang, B. Samson, K. Tankala, M. O'Connor, and M. Alam, “Current developments in high-power monolithic polarization maintaining fiber amplifiers for coherent beam combining applications,” Proc. SPIE 6453, Fiber Lasers IV: Technology, Systems, and Applications, 64531F–64531F (2007).
8.	C. Zeringue, C. Vergien, and I. Dajani, “Pump-limited, 203 W, single-frequency monolithic fiber amplifier based on laser gain competition,” Opt. Lett. 36(5), 618–620 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	J. M. C. Boggio, J. D. Marconi, and H. L. Fragnito, “Experimental and numerical investigation of the SBS-threshold increase in an optical fiber by applying strain distributions,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(11), 3808–3814 (2005). [CrossRef]
10.	L. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Wang, and Y. Feng, “Stimulated-Brillouin-scattering-suppressed high-power single-frequency polarization-maintaining Raman fiber amplifier with longitudinally varied strain for laser guide star,” Opt. Lett. 37(22), 4796–4798 (2012). [PubMed]
11.	A. Liu, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in single-frequency fiber amplifiers with delivery fibers,” Opt. Express 17(17), 15201–15209 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.	C. Vergien, I. Dajani, and C. Zeringue, “Theoretical analysis of single-frequency Raman fiber amplifier system operating at 1178 nm,” Opt. Express 18(25), 26214–26228 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13.	Y. Fan, B. He, J. Zhou, J. Zheng, H. Liu, Y. Wei, J. Dong, and Q. Lou, “Thermal effects in kilowatt all-fiber MOPA,” Opt. Express 19(16), 15162–15172 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	I. Dajani, C. Vergien, C. Robin, and C. Zeringue, “Experimental and theoretical investigations of photonic crystal fiber amplifier with 260 W output,” Opt. Express 17(26), 24317–24333 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.	M. Nikles, L. Thevenaz, and P. A. Robert, “Brillouin gain spectrum characterization in single-mode optical fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 15(10), 1842–1851 (1997). [CrossRef]
16.	Corning. Inc., http://www.corning.com/opticalfiber/library/fiber_mechanical_reliability/calculators.aspx.
17.	T. Horiguchi, K. Shimizu, T. Kurashima, M. Tateda, and Y. Koyamada, “Development of a distributed sensing technique using Brillouin scattering,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13(7), 1296–1302 (1995). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(060.2320) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics amplifiers and oscillators
(140.3510) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, fiber
(290.5900) Scattering : Scattering, stimulated Brillouin

ToC Category:
Lasers and Laser Optics

History
Original Manuscript: November 27, 2012
Revised Manuscript: January 16, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: February 18, 2013
Published: February 26, 2013

Citation
Lei Zhang, Shuzhen Cui, Chi Liu, Jun Zhou, and Yan Feng, "170 W, single-frequency, single-mode, linearly-polarized, Yb-doped all-fiber amplifier," Opt. Express 21, 5456-5462 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-5-5456

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

Y. Jeong, J. Nilsson, J. K. Sahu, D. N. Payne, R. Horley, L. M. B. Hickey, and P. W. Turner “Power scaling of single-frequency ytterbium-doped fiber master-oscillator power-amplifier sources up to 500 W,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.13(3), 546–551 (2007). [CrossRef]
S. Gray, A. Liu, D. T. Walton, J. Wang, M.-J. Li, X. Chen, A. B. Ruffin, J. A. Demeritt, and L. A. Zenteno, “502 Watt, single transverse mode, narrow linewidth, bidirectionally pumped Yb-doped fiber amplifier,” Opt. Express15(25), 17044–17050 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
G. D. Goodno, L. D. Book, and J. E. Rothenberg, “Low-phase-noise, single-frequency, single-mode 608 W thulium fiber amplifier,” Opt. Lett.34(8), 1204–1206 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. D. Mermelstein, K. Brar, M. J. Andrejco, A. D. Yablon, M. Fishteyn, C. Headley, and D. J. DiGiovanni, “All-fiber 194 W single-frequency single-mode Yb-doped master-oscillator power-amplifier,” in Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (LEOS), the 20th Annual Meeting of the IEEE, 382–383 (2007).
T. Theeg, H. Sayinc, J. Neumann, and D. Kracht, “All-fiber counter-propagation pumped single frequency amplifier stage with 300-W output power,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.24(20), 1864–1867 (2012). [CrossRef]
X. L. Wang, P. Zhou, H. Xiao, Y. X. Ma, X. J. Xu, and Z. J. Liu, “310 W single-frequency all-fiber laser in master oscillator power amplification configuration,” Laser Phys. Lett.9(8), 591–595 (2012). [CrossRef]
D. P. Machewirth, Q. Wang, B. Samson, K. Tankala, M. O'Connor, and M. Alam, “Current developments in high-power monolithic polarization maintaining fiber amplifiers for coherent beam combining applications,” Proc. SPIE 6453, Fiber Lasers IV: Technology, Systems, and Applications, 64531F–64531F (2007).
C. Zeringue, C. Vergien, and I. Dajani, “Pump-limited, 203 W, single-frequency monolithic fiber amplifier based on laser gain competition,” Opt. Lett.36(5), 618–620 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. M. C. Boggio, J. D. Marconi, and H. L. Fragnito, “Experimental and numerical investigation of the SBS-threshold increase in an optical fiber by applying strain distributions,” J. Lightwave Technol.23(11), 3808–3814 (2005). [CrossRef]
L. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Wang, and Y. Feng, “Stimulated-Brillouin-scattering-suppressed high-power single-frequency polarization-maintaining Raman fiber amplifier with longitudinally varied strain for laser guide star,” Opt. Lett.37(22), 4796–4798 (2012). [PubMed]
A. Liu, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in single-frequency fiber amplifiers with delivery fibers,” Opt. Express17(17), 15201–15209 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Vergien, I. Dajani, and C. Zeringue, “Theoretical analysis of single-frequency Raman fiber amplifier system operating at 1178 nm,” Opt. Express18(25), 26214–26228 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Y. Fan, B. He, J. Zhou, J. Zheng, H. Liu, Y. Wei, J. Dong, and Q. Lou, “Thermal effects in kilowatt all-fiber MOPA,” Opt. Express19(16), 15162–15172 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
I. Dajani, C. Vergien, C. Robin, and C. Zeringue, “Experimental and theoretical investigations of photonic crystal fiber amplifier with 260 W output,” Opt. Express17(26), 24317–24333 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. Nikles, L. Thevenaz, and P. A. Robert, “Brillouin gain spectrum characterization in single-mode optical fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol.15(10), 1842–1851 (1997). [CrossRef]
Corning. Inc., http://www.corning.com/opticalfiber/library/fiber_mechanical_reliability/calculators.aspx .
T. Horiguchi, K. Shimizu, T. Kurashima, M. Tateda, and Y. Koyamada, “Development of a distributed sensing technique using Brillouin scattering,” J. Lightwave Technol.13(7), 1296–1302 (1995). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper