OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 6 — Mar. 25, 2013
  • pp: 6943–6954
« Show journal navigation

Design of broadband and high-output power uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes

Rong Zhang, Bouchaib Hraimel, Xue Li, Peng Zhang, and Xiupu Zhang  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 6, pp. 6943-6954 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.006943


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (4418 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In this paper, physically-based simulations are carried out to investigate and design broadband and high-output power uni-traveling carrier (UTC) photodiodes. The physical model is first verified by comparison to experimentally measured results. The graded-bandgap structure, which can induce potential gradient, is considered to be used in the absorption layers. It is shown that the electric field in the absorption layer is increased by the gradient, thus the performance of bandwidth and saturation current is improved by 36.6% and 40% respectively for our considered photodiode. Moreover, a modified graded-bandgap structure is proposed to further increase the electric field, and an additional 9.5% improvement in bandwidth is achieved. The final proposed UTC-PD structures will result in 399-GHz bandwidth and 49-mA DC saturation current.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

Broadband and high-output-power photodiodes (PDs) are considered the key optical-to-electrical signal interface devices for future high-frequency and high-power fiber-optic systems, such as millimeter-wave photonic gigabit communication systems and high-speed coherent optical communication systems [1

1. C. Cox, E. Ackerman, G. Betts, and J. Prince, “Limits on the performance of RF-over-fiber links and their impact on device design,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 54(2), 906–920 (2006). [CrossRef]

3

3. M. Achouche, G. Glastre, C. Caillaud, M. Lahrichi, M. Chtioui, and D. Carpentier, “InGaAs communication photodiodes: from low- to high-power-level designs,” IEEE Photonics J. 2(3), 460–468 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. For conventional PDs, the speed performance is substantially limited by the inherent trade-off between the saturation current (related to the output power) and the resistance–capacitance (RC) limited bandwidth [2

2. J.-W. Shi, C.-B. Huang, and C.-L. Pan, “Millimeter-wave photonic wireless links for very high data rate communication,” NPG Asia Mater. 3(4), 41–48 (2011). [CrossRef]

4

4. H. Ito, S. Kodama, Y. Muramoto, T. Furuta, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Ishibashi, “High-speed and high-output InP–InGaAs unitraveling-carrier photodiodes,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(4), 709–727 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. To overcome this problem, the uni-traveling-carrier PD (UTC-PD) was proposed [3

3. M. Achouche, G. Glastre, C. Caillaud, M. Lahrichi, M. Chtioui, and D. Carpentier, “InGaAs communication photodiodes: from low- to high-power-level designs,” IEEE Photonics J. 2(3), 460–468 (2010). [CrossRef]

6

6. T. Ishibashi, S. Kodoma, N. Shimizu, and T. Furuta, “High-speed response of uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36(Part 1, No. 10), 6263–6268 (1997). [CrossRef]

]. Because only electrons are the active carriers in the UTC-PD, the slow hole transport is eliminated and the bandwidth and saturation-current performance is improved. In the past decade, the performance of UTC-PDs has been significantly improved by novel structure designs [7

7. M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-performance uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes with a new collector design,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(13), 1163–1165 (2008). [CrossRef]

14

14. M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-power and high-linearity uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes for analog photonic links,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(3), 202–204 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. A non-uniform doped collector was designed to relax the space charge effect [7

7. M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-performance uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes with a new collector design,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(13), 1163–1165 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. The modified UTC-PD (MUTC-PD) with partially depleted absorption layer was proposed to improve the bandwidth and the quantum efficiency [8

8. D.-H. Jun, J.-H. Jang, I. Adesida, and J.-I. Song, “Improved efficiency bandwidth product of modified uni-traveling carrier photodiode structures using an undoped photo-absorption layer,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45(4B), 3475–3478 (2006). [CrossRef]

10

10. M. Chtioui, F. Lelarge, A. Enard, F. Pommereau, D. Carpentier, A. Marceaux, F. van Dijk, and M. Achouche, “High responsivity and high power UTC and MUTC GaInAs-InP photodiodes,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(4), 318–320 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. Further increase of the saturation current of the MUTC-PD has been achieved by incorporating a cliff layer before the collector [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. Near-ballistic UTC-PD (NBUTC-PD) has been demonstrated to show superior output power performance [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

, 13

13. J.-W. Shi, Y.-S. Wu, C.-Y. Wu, P.-H. Chiu, and C.-C. Hong, “High-speed, high-responsivity, and high-power performance of near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode at 1.55-μm wavelength,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(9), 1929–1931 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. In the NBUTC-PD, a thin p-type charge layer is inserted in the collector layer to control the internal distribution of electric field, which makes the device operate under higher optimum bias voltage. On the other hand, various optical coupling techniques have also been developed. For instance, edge-illuminated UTC-PD [15

15. H. Fukano, Y. Muramoto, K. Takahata, and Y. Matsuoka, “High efficiency edge-illuminated unitravelling-carrier-structure refracting-facet photodiode,” Electron. Lett. 35(19), 1664–1665 (1999). [CrossRef]

], waveguide-based evanescently coupled UTC-PD [16

16. S. Demiguel, N. Li, X. Li, X. Zheng, J. Kim, J. C. Campbell, H. Lu, and A. Anselm, “Very high-responsivity evanescently coupled photodiodes integrating a short planar multimode waveguide for high-speed applications,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15(12), 1761–1763 (2003). [CrossRef]

, 17

17. J. Klamkin, S. M. Madison, D. C. Oakley, A. Napoleone, F. J. O’Donnell, M. Sheehan, L. J. Missaggia, J. M. Caissie, J. J. Plant, and P. W. Juodawlkis, “Uni-traveling-carrier variable confinement waveguide photodiodes,” Opt. Express 19(11), 10199–10205 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], and micro-ring-based UTC-PD [18

18. M. Hosseinifar, V. Ahmadi, and G. Abaeiani, “Microring-based unitraveling carrier photodiodes for high bandwidth-efficiency product photodetection in optical communication,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(9), 1285–1292 (2011). [CrossRef]

] were all demonstrated to show improved performance. In addition, flip-chip bonding has been implemented to minimize the device heating problem, which greatly improves the high-power performance [19

19. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. The recently reported UTC-PDs exhibit bandwidth and saturation current of 180 GHz and 37 mA [19

19. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]

], 24 GHz and 144 mA [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

], and 250 GHz and 17 mA [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

].

To simulate the device performance, equivalent-circuit models were developed including carrier-transit-time and the RC-delay-time bandwidth-limiting factors. These parameters can be extracted by fitting the values of the circuit components to match with the experimental results [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

, 20

20. Y.-S. Wu, J.-W. Shi, and P.-H. Chiu, “Analytical modeling of a high-performance near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode at a 1.55-μm wavelength,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(8), 938–940 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. Therefore, this method relies on measurement of the priory-fabricated device. As an alternative, physically-based modeling of UTC-PDs will be presented in this study. The accuracy of the modeling will be verified by simulating the UTC-PDs presented in [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

, 12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

], and then a structure design with graded bandgap absorption layer will be investigated. Based on the modeling results, a novel modified graded bandgap structure by splitting the absorption layer will be proposed to improve the bandwidth performance. It will be shown that the physically-based modeling can be used to accurately predict the intrinsic behavior of UTC-PDs and to directly design the device structure, and our proposed UTC-PDs with the modified graded bandgap absorption layer will improve the bandwidth and saturation current effectively.

2. Physical modeling

2.1 Simulator

2.2 Simulation of UTC-PDs

To verify the physical modeling, we simulate the MUTC1 reported in [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

] and NBUTC-PD reported in [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

], labeled here as device PA and PB, respectively. PA has a 1.05-μm partially-depleted absorption layer (0.9-μm undepleted followed by 0.15-μm depleted) and a 0.9-μm collector. By inserting a cliff layer before the collector, PA exhibits a high-saturation-current performance (144 mA). PB has a relative thin absorption layer and collector, which is designed for high-frequency operation (250 GHz). The detailed layer parameters are given in Tables 1

Table 1. Layer Parameters of PA in [11] and PA with Graded-bandgap Absorption Layer

table-icon
View This Table
| View All Tables
and 2

Table 2. Layer Parameters of PB in [12] and PB with Graded-bandgap Absorption Layer

table-icon
View This Table
| View All Tables
for PA and PB, respectively. For PA, Fig. 1(a)
Fig. 1 Simulated modulation response of (a) PA with diameters of 28, 34, 40, and 56 μm at −6 V bias voltage and measured bandwidth [11], and (b) PB (16 μm2) at bias voltages of −2 V and −5 V and measured response [12] (y-axis keeps the same scale with Fig. 2b in [12], and the inset shows only the simulated results). The dip at 135 GHz in the experimental curve is caused by the integrated coplanar waveguide [12].
shows simulated modulation response for four active area diameters of 28, 34, 40, and 56 μm, and for comparison measured bandwidths are also indicated [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. A series resistance of 15 Ω is included in the simulation for PA to fit the experimental results. The reported measured bandwidths of PA are 23 GHz, 20 GHz, 15 GHz, and 8 GHz at device diameters of 28, 34, 40, and 56 μm, respectively. Correspondingly, our simulated bandwidths are 24.3 GHz, 20.5 GHz, 15.9 GHz, and 9.7 GHz as shown in Fig. 1(a). For PB, Fig. 1(b) shows the simulated modulation response at two bias voltages of −2 and −5 V, and also the measured modulation response at −2 V is also shown for comparison. It is seen that a good agreement between the simulation and measurement is achieved. The experimental results in [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

] showed that there is a slight degradation of bandwidth at higher bias of −5 V, which is also predicted as shown in Fig. 1(b) inset.

On the other hand, the performance of high-output photodiodes may be impacted by high hole charge density due to high injection optical power. The effect of a high hole charge density in the p-type absorption would accelerate the electron diffusion and result in bandwidth enhancement under high power illumination [4

4. H. Ito, S. Kodama, Y. Muramoto, T. Furuta, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Ishibashi, “High-speed and high-output InP–InGaAs unitraveling-carrier photodiodes,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(4), 709–727 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Figure 2
Fig. 2 Simulated modulation response of PA (28 μm) under different illumination power densities.
shows the simulated modulation response at four illumination densities of 5000, 10000, 15000, and 20000 W/cm2. It is clearly obvious that higher hole charge density indeed improves the bandwidth. Consequently, the physically-based simulations are reliable. It should be mentioned that although in the simulation, parasitic elements in actual circuits are not included, and the series resistance is used to fit the simulated bandwidth with measured data, the physical effects showing bandwidth changed with device active area, external bias voltage, and illumination power are successfully predicted. All the fitted parameters are kept in the following simulations to ensure that the modeling is taken under the same condition.

3. Device design and analysis

3.1 Graded bandgap design

The graded structures include graded doping and graded bandgap. The graded doping can induce a built-in electric field, which can make electrons drift and move faster. For example, in Table 2, a large slope of linear graded doping profile is used in PB, which can create a built-in electric field from ~2 to ~80 kV/cm [19

19. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. Similarly, a step doping is adopted for PA as seen in Table 1. In contrast to the widely used graded doping, to the best of our knowledge, the absorption layer with graded-bandgap structure has not been adopted yet in actual UTC-PDs. The potential gradient from the graded bandgap can also accelerate the electrons and further improve the device performance. For the InP/InGaAs material system, In1-xGaxAsyP1-y or In1-x-yAlxGayAs with lattice matched to InP can provide a range of bandgaps, which can be used to construct a continuous compositionally-graded bandgap structure. Here, the graded absorption layer using In1-xGaxAsyP1-y will be considered.

Eg(In1-xGaxAsyP1y)=1.35+(0.642+0.758x)x+(0.101y1.101)y(0.28x0.109y+0.159)xy.
(1)

To design a graded In1-xGaxAsyP1-y absorption layer, two basic conditions should be satisfied.

  • 1) To maintain the lattice matched to InP, x and y should have the following relation [24

    24. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III–V Semiconductor Compounds InP, InAs, GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP, (John Wiley and Sons, 1992).

    ],
    x=0.1896y0.41760.0125y.
    (2)
  • 2) To excite the interband transition by the light around 1.5-μm wavelength, Eg should be no more than 0.82 eV.

The above two conditions can be fulfilled within the range of x from 0.38 to 0.47, and correspondingly, the range of y is from 0.82 to 1. Therefore, the maximum potential difference is formed between In0.62Ga0.38As0.82P0.18 and In0.53Ga0.47As.

To simulate the effect of graded bandgap, the linear compositionally-graded In0.62Ga0.38As0.82P0.18→In0.53Ga0.47As is considered to substitute for the In0.53Ga0.47As absorption layer of PA (0.9-μm undepleted part) and PB. Note that the graded InAlGaAs transition layer is also replaced with InGaAsP in PB structure. For clarity, the layer parameters of PA and PB with the graded bandgap absorption layers are also listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. If the top of the P contact layer is set as the origin of the depth (d), the relations between the composition fraction x and d (in μm) are2.762x0.276d=1, d[0.18,1.08]μmfor PA, and 3.247x1.948d=1,d[0.12,0.27]μmfor PB. The fraction y is calculated according to condition 1, i.e. (2). The electric field distributions and the band diagram in the 0.15-μm-thickness absorption layer (from 0.12 to 0.27 μm) of PB are plotted in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Distribution of electric field in the absorption layer of PB with and without graded-bandgap design. Inset shows the band diagram of the absorption layer with and without graded bandgap design. External bias voltage: −2 V.
. It is seen that the built-in electric filed induced by the graded doping is greater than ~2 kV/cm as mentioned above [19

19. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. When the graded bandgap is introduced, the built-in electric field is increased to greater than ~4 kV/cm, which will lead to the improvement in bandwidth. It is also seen that the potential gradient in conduction band is enhanced, which means that the graded bandgap will mainly enhance the transport of electrons.

To show the performance improvement of using the graded bandgap design for PA and PB as shown in Tables 1 and 2, simulated modulation responses with comparison to PA and PB without using graded bandgap are shown in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Simulated modulation response for (a) PA (28-μm diameter) at −6V bias, (b) PB at −2V bias, using and without using graded-bandgap absorption layer.
. It is seen that the bandwidths are increased from 24.3 GHz to 26.1 GHz and from 273 GHz to 373 GHz for PA and PB, respectively. The improvement of PB is 36.6%, much more significant than PA for which the improvement is 7.4%. This is attributed to a larger slope of the potential gradient in a thinner absorption layer in PB compared to PA.

3.2 Modified graded bandgap design

It is shown that the graded bandgap will contribute significantly to the built-in electric field if larger slope of the potential gradient is induced. The slope can be increased by using a larger potential difference or shortening the graded region. However, the maximum potential difference is determined by condition 2, and shortening the graded region by simply reducing the thickness of the absorption layer will sacrifice the device responsivity. As shown in Fig. 3, the improvement of electric field after the first 0.12-μm thickness (after the depth of 0.24 μm) of the absorption layer is not significant by using the graded bandgap. Thus, an efficient way to implement the gradient is to use the graded design (including graded bandgap and graded doping) only in the first 0.12-μm-thickness region and leave the rest 0.03-μm-thickness region ungraded. Similar design is also applied to PA in which the 0.9-μm-thickness undepleted absorption layer is split into an 0.82-μm-thickness graded region and an 0.08-μm-thickness ungraded region. The effect on the electric field distribution, in the absorption layer, by using this modified graded bandgap (graded doping is also modified, similarly hereinafter) for PB is shown in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Distribution of electric field in absorption layer of PB with graded and modified graded bandgap. Inset is a large-scale view in y axis.
. It is seen that the modified graded bandgap results in the increase of the build-in electric field, and also the increase of the electric field is the largest at around depth of 0.24 μm that is corresponding to the graded absorption layer. Using the modified graded bandgap, the improvements of bandwidth for both the devices can be found in Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Simulated modulation response of (a) PA (28-μm diameter) at −6V bias voltage (b) PB at −2V bias voltage using modified graded bandgap with comparison to graded bandgap.
, in which modulation responses of PA and PB are shown with comparison to the graded bandgap. It is seen that this modification of the graded absorption layers leads to additional 1-GHz (4.1%) and 26-GHz (9.5%) bandwidth improvements for PA and PB, respectively.

It is shown above that graded bandgap leads to enhancement of modulation response, and particularly much more significant for thin absorption layer. On the other hand, the modulation response may be limited by RC delay, mainly induced by the collector layer, thus use of graded doping and/or graded bandgap that enhance the electron diffusion may not improve the modulation performance. As an example, we consider PB in [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

] in which graded doping was used, where it was found that the modulation response might be limited by RC delay. Compared PB with similar devices in [19

19. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]

], much lower contact resistance and parasitic capacitance are achieved. Taking those values in the equivalent circuit in [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

], a RC bandwidth of around 340 GHz is achieved, much higher than the measured 250 GHz. Also, if sacrificing a small part of the output power by reducing the device active area from 16 μm2 to 14 μm2, the RC bandwidth can reach 380 GHz. Therefore, it is highly possible that improving the electron transit speed in the absorption layer by using graded bandgap is still an effective way to increase the bandwidth for many designs of broadband photodiodes.

3.3 Saturation current

With increased electron speed, the saturation current is also improved. The saturation current performance of PB is simulated indirectly by solving the photocurrent under DC illumination. Since the simulator simply takes the imaginary part (κ) of the refractive index to evaluate the optic-to-electric (O-E) conversion efficiency, in the simulations κ is determined by fitting the responsivity (the slopes of the curves in Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Under DC illumination, simulated photocurrent versus illumination power of PB.
) to the measured result in [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. κ is assumed the same for In0.53Ga0.47As and InGaAsP. Both InGaAsP (low P fraction for our structure) and In0.53Ga0.47As are direct bandgap materials and have similar band structures, therefore, this approximation is acceptable and may not lead to significant error in O-E conversion efficiency of InGaAsP. As shown in Fig. 7, the DC current increases linearly with the increasing light power till the inflection point, and then the current becomes to saturate. The reduction of the slope indicates a decreased responsivity due to the space charge effect from the carrier storage at high-optical input [4

4. H. Ito, S. Kodama, Y. Muramoto, T. Furuta, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Ishibashi, “High-speed and high-output InP–InGaAs unitraveling-carrier photodiodes,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(4), 709–727 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Such effect can also lead to the degradation of the bandwidth. The DC saturation current for PB is 35 mA. By using the graded bandgap structure, the DC saturation current can be improved to 49 mA.

The improvement in the saturation current by the graded bandgap design may be understood as follows. It is known that the saturation effect is due to the space charge in the depleted collector. High electron concentration caused by high power illumination will reduce the electric field in the collector, and thus leading to the saturation. Basically, there are critical values for electric field Ec and for electron concentration nc. When the electron concentration in the collector increases, the field in the collector reduces and finally falls below Ec, where the saturation occurs. Ec is usually determined by the material which is InP here. However, nc may vary as external conditions. For example, higher bias voltage usually leads to higher saturation current. This means nc is a function of bias voltage. This could be used to explain our situation. Under moderate illumination power, the external bias voltage mainly falls on the depleted collector. But when the illumination power increases, the bias voltage may be sharedby the junction at the interface of the block layer and the absorption layer, which is explained below. For the structure without graded bandgap biased at −2 V voltage, as shown in Figs. 8(a)
Fig. 8 Band diagrams (solid) and electron distributions (dashed) under different illumination levels for ungraded and graded bandgap structures. The bias voltage is −2 V. (a) Ungraded, no illumination, (b) Ungraded, illumination power: 105 W/cm2 (c) Ungraded, illumination power: 106 W/cm2 (d) Ungraded, illumination power: 2 × 106 W/cm2 (e) Graded, illumination power: 2 × 106 W/cm2 (f) Comparison of electron concentrations, illumination power: 2 × 106 W/cm2. The position of each layer is marked in the figures.
-8(d), when the illumination is increased, the concentration of photo-generated carriers in the absorption layer increases. For the case of no illumination, it is seen that the collector (as well as the transition layer which is actually a part of the effective collector) is depleted, and the electron concentration is around 103/cm3. For the case of illumination power density of 105 W/cm2, the photo generation occurs. The electron concentrations in the absorption layer and the collector increase, and the device operates. For the case of illumination power density of 106 W/cm2, the device operates normally. But there is a slight change at the interface between the block layer and the absorption layer, which is indicated by the boxes in the figures. The electron concentration in the absorption layer goes higher as the illumination power increases, thus electron diffusion into the block layer occurs, which forms a junction at the interface. For the case of illumination power density of 2 × 106W/cm2, as the illumination power increases continuously, the junction becomes significant because of the rise of the electron concentration. This junction suffers partial of the external bias, which lowers the electric field in the collector. As seen clearly in Fig. 8(d), the electric field at the p side of the collector (in the transition layer) is reduced compared to that in Fig. 8(a). Although at this illumination level, the electric field in the collector is not affected much and the output current is still not saturated, further increasing the illumination power will make this junction more depleted and experience more external bias. This effect will reduce the electric field in the collector, pushing the current saturation appearing early. If considering the graded bandgap design, the situation discussed above could be relaxed. For the graded bandgap structure, the electron concentration also increases with increasing illumination power. However, the shortened electron transition time by the potential gradient will reduce the electron concentration in the absorption layer greatly, which is shown in Figs. 8(e) and 8(f). At the same illumination level (2 × 106 W/cm2), the electron concentration is reduced by more than 3 times. This effect is especially significant in the vicinity of the interface between the block layer and the absorption layer. Therefore, the electron diffusion into the block layer is reduced accordingly, and the junction is also suppressed. That is to say, at the same illumination power, more external bias voltage falls on the collector for graded structure than ungraded structure, and the electric field in the collector of graded structure is maintained correspondingly. This may be the possible reason to explain the improvement of saturation current by the graded bandgap design.

Although the DC saturation current is simulated instead of the AC saturation current, both of them are closely affected by the space-charge effect. Thus, the reduction of the responsivity is an effective indicator of AC saturation current [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. The actual improvement of the saturation current might be much lower due to several factors such as voltage swing and thermal effect as stated in [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. To realize high-output power performance, the cliff layer design in [11

11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

] may be employed to further increase the saturation current. However, in practical use, the saturation current for such small device is usually limited by thermal failure. Therefore, including the heat dissipation problem in the simulation is necessary to evaluate the saturation current accurately. Our simulated results without considering the heat could be useful providing new packaging techniques with efficient heat sinking are developed.

3.4 Fabrication considerations

It should be noted that both In1-xGaxAsyP1-y and In1-x-yAlxGayAs can be grown by epitaxy techniques, such as MBE, MOVPE, or MOCVD, etc. For In1-xGaxAsyP1-y grown by MOCVD, the quality of linearly grading can be ensured except for large composition ranges, which can meet the requirement of the graded absorption layer. While for the thin transition layer with a large grading range from In0.53Ga0.47As to InP, an alternative method is using step grading. The differences in simulated performances between the linearly continuous grading and a 3-step grading in transition layer are negligible. In addition, In1-x-yAlxGayAs is easier to control in MBE. Therefore, the use of In1-x-yAlxGayAs graded layer may be more practical and economical. The design method of a continuous compositionally-graded In1-x-yAlxGayAs absorption layer is similar to that of In1-xGaxAsyP1-y.

4. Conclusion

Design of broadband and high-output power UTC-PDs is of crucial importance to future high-speed communication systems. Different from equivalent circuit models requiring fitted values from measurements, it is shown that physically-based modeling of UTC-PDs can predict the device performance as long as the device structural parameters are known, and the simulated results can be directly used in the device design. Using the physical modeling, the graded bandgap absorption layer has been considered and investigated, and it is shown that such design is especially effective for devices with thin absorption layers. The photodiode performance can be further improved by using the modified graded structure. The total improvement of 46.1% in bandwidth, by using the proposed modified graded bandgap absorption layer for PB, is predicted. With the reduced electron transit time, the saturation current is also improved by 40%. Using the PB structure in [12

12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

] with our proposed modified graded bandgap, 399-GHz bandwidth and 49-mA DC saturation current are predicted by the physically-based modeling. Our future work is to fabricate photodiodes with modified graded bandgap structure and further verify our proposed design.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a team research project of Quebec Fonds de recherche nature et technologies (FQRNT).

References and links

1.

C. Cox, E. Ackerman, G. Betts, and J. Prince, “Limits on the performance of RF-over-fiber links and their impact on device design,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 54(2), 906–920 (2006). [CrossRef]

2.

J.-W. Shi, C.-B. Huang, and C.-L. Pan, “Millimeter-wave photonic wireless links for very high data rate communication,” NPG Asia Mater. 3(4), 41–48 (2011). [CrossRef]

3.

M. Achouche, G. Glastre, C. Caillaud, M. Lahrichi, M. Chtioui, and D. Carpentier, “InGaAs communication photodiodes: from low- to high-power-level designs,” IEEE Photonics J. 2(3), 460–468 (2010). [CrossRef]

4.

H. Ito, S. Kodama, Y. Muramoto, T. Furuta, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Ishibashi, “High-speed and high-output InP–InGaAs unitraveling-carrier photodiodes,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(4), 709–727 (2004). [CrossRef]

5.

T. Ishibashi, N. Shimizu, S. Kodama, H. Ito, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Furuta, “Uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes,” in Ultrafast Electronics Optoelectronics OSA Spring Topical Meeting, Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, 1997), pp. 166–168.

6.

T. Ishibashi, S. Kodoma, N. Shimizu, and T. Furuta, “High-speed response of uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36(Part 1, No. 10), 6263–6268 (1997). [CrossRef]

7.

M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-performance uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes with a new collector design,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(13), 1163–1165 (2008). [CrossRef]

8.

D.-H. Jun, J.-H. Jang, I. Adesida, and J.-I. Song, “Improved efficiency bandwidth product of modified uni-traveling carrier photodiode structures using an undoped photo-absorption layer,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45(4B), 3475–3478 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

X. Wang, N. Duan, H. Chen, and J. C. Campbell, “InGaAs-InP photodiodes with high responsivity and high saturation power,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 19(16), 1272–1274 (2007). [CrossRef]

10.

M. Chtioui, F. Lelarge, A. Enard, F. Pommereau, D. Carpentier, A. Marceaux, F. van Dijk, and M. Achouche, “High responsivity and high power UTC and MUTC GaInAs-InP photodiodes,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(4), 318–320 (2012). [CrossRef]

11.

Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]

12.

J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]

13.

J.-W. Shi, Y.-S. Wu, C.-Y. Wu, P.-H. Chiu, and C.-C. Hong, “High-speed, high-responsivity, and high-power performance of near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode at 1.55-μm wavelength,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(9), 1929–1931 (2005). [CrossRef]

14.

M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-power and high-linearity uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes for analog photonic links,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(3), 202–204 (2008). [CrossRef]

15.

H. Fukano, Y. Muramoto, K. Takahata, and Y. Matsuoka, “High efficiency edge-illuminated unitravelling-carrier-structure refracting-facet photodiode,” Electron. Lett. 35(19), 1664–1665 (1999). [CrossRef]

16.

S. Demiguel, N. Li, X. Li, X. Zheng, J. Kim, J. C. Campbell, H. Lu, and A. Anselm, “Very high-responsivity evanescently coupled photodiodes integrating a short planar multimode waveguide for high-speed applications,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15(12), 1761–1763 (2003). [CrossRef]

17.

J. Klamkin, S. M. Madison, D. C. Oakley, A. Napoleone, F. J. O’Donnell, M. Sheehan, L. J. Missaggia, J. M. Caissie, J. J. Plant, and P. W. Juodawlkis, “Uni-traveling-carrier variable confinement waveguide photodiodes,” Opt. Express 19(11), 10199–10205 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

M. Hosseinifar, V. Ahmadi, and G. Abaeiani, “Microring-based unitraveling carrier photodiodes for high bandwidth-efficiency product photodetection in optical communication,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(9), 1285–1292 (2011). [CrossRef]

19.

J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]

20.

Y.-S. Wu, J.-W. Shi, and P.-H. Chiu, “Analytical modeling of a high-performance near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode at a 1.55-μm wavelength,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(8), 938–940 (2006). [CrossRef]

21.

R. Stratton, “Diffusion of hot and cold electrons in semiconductor barriers,” Phys. Rev. 126(6), 2002–2014 (1962). [CrossRef]

22.

R. Stratton, “Semiconductor current-flow equations (diffusion and degeneracy),” IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 19(12), 1288–1292 (1972). [CrossRef]

23.

New semiconductor materials, characteristics and properties, http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/SVA/NSM/.

24.

S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III–V Semiconductor Compounds InP, InAs, GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP, (John Wiley and Sons, 1992).

OCIS Codes
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications
(230.5170) Optical devices : Photodiodes
(250.0040) Optoelectronics : Detectors

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: January 28, 2013
Revised Manuscript: March 4, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: March 5, 2013
Published: March 13, 2013

Citation
Rong Zhang, Bouchaib Hraimel, Xue Li, Peng Zhang, and Xiupu Zhang, "Design of broadband and high-output power uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes," Opt. Express 21, 6943-6954 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-6-6943


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. C. Cox, E. Ackerman, G. Betts, and J. Prince, “Limits on the performance of RF-over-fiber links and their impact on device design,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.54(2), 906–920 (2006). [CrossRef]
  2. J.-W. Shi, C.-B. Huang, and C.-L. Pan, “Millimeter-wave photonic wireless links for very high data rate communication,” NPG Asia Mater.3(4), 41–48 (2011). [CrossRef]
  3. M. Achouche, G. Glastre, C. Caillaud, M. Lahrichi, M. Chtioui, and D. Carpentier, “InGaAs communication photodiodes: from low- to high-power-level designs,” IEEE Photonics J.2(3), 460–468 (2010). [CrossRef]
  4. H. Ito, S. Kodama, Y. Muramoto, T. Furuta, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Ishibashi, “High-speed and high-output InP–InGaAs unitraveling-carrier photodiodes,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.10(4), 709–727 (2004). [CrossRef]
  5. T. Ishibashi, N. Shimizu, S. Kodama, H. Ito, T. Nagatsuma, and T. Furuta, “Uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes,” in Ultrafast Electronics Optoelectronics OSA Spring Topical Meeting, Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, 1997), pp. 166–168.
  6. T. Ishibashi, S. Kodoma, N. Shimizu, and T. Furuta, “High-speed response of uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.36(Part 1, No. 10), 6263–6268 (1997). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-performance uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes with a new collector design,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20(13), 1163–1165 (2008). [CrossRef]
  8. D.-H. Jun, J.-H. Jang, I. Adesida, and J.-I. Song, “Improved efficiency bandwidth product of modified uni-traveling carrier photodiode structures using an undoped photo-absorption layer,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.45(4B), 3475–3478 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. X. Wang, N. Duan, H. Chen, and J. C. Campbell, “InGaAs-InP photodiodes with high responsivity and high saturation power,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.19(16), 1272–1274 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Chtioui, F. Lelarge, A. Enard, F. Pommereau, D. Carpentier, A. Marceaux, F. van Dijk, and M. Achouche, “High responsivity and high power UTC and MUTC GaInAs-InP photodiodes,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.24(4), 318–320 (2012). [CrossRef]
  11. Z. Li, H. Pan, H. Chen, A. Beling, and J. C. Campbell, “High-saturation-current modified uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with cliff layer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.46(5), 626–632 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, and J. E. Bowers, “Design and analysis of ultra-high-speed near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes under a 50-Ω load for high-power performance,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.24(7), 533–535 (2012). [CrossRef]
  13. J.-W. Shi, Y.-S. Wu, C.-Y. Wu, P.-H. Chiu, and C.-C. Hong, “High-speed, high-responsivity, and high-power performance of near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode at 1.55-μm wavelength,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.17(9), 1929–1931 (2005). [CrossRef]
  14. M. Chtioui, A. Enard, D. Carpentier, S. Bernard, B. Rousseau, F. Lelarge, F. Pommereau, and M. Achouche, “High-power and high-linearity uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes for analog photonic links,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20(3), 202–204 (2008). [CrossRef]
  15. H. Fukano, Y. Muramoto, K. Takahata, and Y. Matsuoka, “High efficiency edge-illuminated unitravelling-carrier-structure refracting-facet photodiode,” Electron. Lett.35(19), 1664–1665 (1999). [CrossRef]
  16. S. Demiguel, N. Li, X. Li, X. Zheng, J. Kim, J. C. Campbell, H. Lu, and A. Anselm, “Very high-responsivity evanescently coupled photodiodes integrating a short planar multimode waveguide for high-speed applications,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.15(12), 1761–1763 (2003). [CrossRef]
  17. J. Klamkin, S. M. Madison, D. C. Oakley, A. Napoleone, F. J. O’Donnell, M. Sheehan, L. J. Missaggia, J. M. Caissie, J. J. Plant, and P. W. Juodawlkis, “Uni-traveling-carrier variable confinement waveguide photodiodes,” Opt. Express19(11), 10199–10205 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. Hosseinifar, V. Ahmadi, and G. Abaeiani, “Microring-based unitraveling carrier photodiodes for high bandwidth-efficiency product photodetection in optical communication,” J. Lightwave Technol.29(9), 1285–1292 (2011). [CrossRef]
  19. J.-W. Shi, F.-M. Kuo, C.-J. Wu, C. L. Chang, C.-Y. Liu, C. Y. Chen, and J.-I. Chyi, “Extremely high saturation current-bandwidth product performance of a near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with a flip-chip bonding structure,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.46(1), 80–86 (2010). [CrossRef]
  20. Y.-S. Wu, J.-W. Shi, and P.-H. Chiu, “Analytical modeling of a high-performance near-ballistic uni-traveling-carrier photodiode at a 1.55-μm wavelength,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.18(8), 938–940 (2006). [CrossRef]
  21. R. Stratton, “Diffusion of hot and cold electrons in semiconductor barriers,” Phys. Rev.126(6), 2002–2014 (1962). [CrossRef]
  22. R. Stratton, “Semiconductor current-flow equations (diffusion and degeneracy),” IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev.19(12), 1288–1292 (1972). [CrossRef]
  23. New semiconductor materials, characteristics and properties, http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/SVA/NSM/ .
  24. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III–V Semiconductor Compounds InP, InAs, GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP, (John Wiley and Sons, 1992).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited