OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 8 — Apr. 22, 2013
  • pp: 10278–10288
« Show journal navigation

Enhanced 1.54 μm emission in Y-Er disilicate thin films on silicon photonic crystal cavities

R. Lo Savio, M. Miritello, A. Shakoor, P. Cardile, K. Welna, L. C. Andreani, D. Gerace, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, F. Priolo, and M. Galli  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 8, pp. 10278-10288 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.010278


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1577 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We introduce an Y-Er disilicate thin film deposited on top of a silicon photonic crystal cavity as a gain medium for active silicon photonic devices. Using photoluminescence analysis, we demonstrate that Er luminescence at 1.54 μm is enhanced by coupling with the cavity modes, and that the directionality of the Er optical emission can be controlled through far-field optimization of the cavity. We determine the maximum excitation power that can be coupled into the cavity to be 12 mW, which is limited by free carrier absorption and thermal heating. At maximum excitation, we observe that nearly 30% of the Er population is in the excited state, as estimated from the direct measurement of the emitted power. Finally, using time-resolved photoluminescence measurements, we determine a value of 2.3 for the Purcell factor of the system at room temperature. These results indicate that overcoating a silicon photonic nanostructure with an Er-rich dielectric layer is a promising method for achieving light emission at 1.54 µm wavelength on a silicon platform.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

Light emission from silicon is one of the main challenges of the silicon photonics paradigm, due to the material’s indirect band gap. Great efforts have been made in the last decades to overcome this limit and to fabricate Si light emitters; defect and device engineering are among the most interesting approaches [1

1. J. M. Shainline and J. Xu, “Silicon as an emissive optical medium,” Laser Photonics Rev. 1(4), 334–348 (2007). [CrossRef]

,2

2. D. Liang and J. E. Bowers, “Recent progress in lasers on silicon,” Nat. Photonics 4(8), 511–517 (2010). [CrossRef]

].

Defect engineering consists of the intentional insertion of optically active impurities, such as dopants or defects [3

3. G. Franzò, F. Priolo, S. Coffa, A. Polman, and A. Carnera, “Room-temperature electroluminescence from Er-doped crystalline Si,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(17), 2235–2237 (1994). [CrossRef]

6

6. S. G. Cloutier, P. A. Kossyrev, and J. M. Xu, “Optical gain and stimulated emission in periodic nanopatterned crystalline silicon,” Nat. Mater. 4(12), 887–891 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], into the crystalline silicon (c-Si). In particular, since the first demonstration of optical emission from Er-doped Si in 1983 [7

7. H. Ennen, J. Schneider, G. Pomrenke, and A. Axmann, “1.54-µm luminescence of erbium-implanted III-V semiconductors and silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 43(10), 943–945 (1983). [CrossRef]

], erbium has been widely studied as the active impurity. The transition between the first excited state and the ground state gives rise to the emission of a photon at the technologically important wavelength of 1.54 μm. Er-doped crystalline silicon as a luminescent material has two main drawbacks, however: (i) the low solubility of Er in Si limits the maximum concentration to about 1018 Er/cm3, and (ii) the luminescence is strongly quenched at room temperature [8

8. A. Polman, G. N. van den Hoven, J. S. Custer, J. H. Shin, R. Serna, and P. F. A. Alkemade, “Erbium in crystal silicon: optical activation, excitation, and concentration limits,” J. Appl. Phys. 77(3), 1256–1262 (1995). [CrossRef]

,9

9. S. Coffa, G. Franzò, F. Priolo, A. Polman, and R. Serna, “Temperature dependence and quenching processes of the intra-4f luminescence of Er in crystalline Si,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 49(23), 16313–16320 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. These limits can be overcome by introducing the Er atoms into different hosts that are compatible with Si, and that can accommodate higher Er concentrations. For example, Y-Er disilicate (Y2-xErxSi2O7, 0 < x ≤ 2) is a good host candidate since it affords a maximum solubility of 1022 cm−3. This high solubility is due to the fact that both constituent materials (Er2Si2O7, and Y2Si2O7) have the same crystalline structure with very similar lattice parameters, and both Er and Y atoms occupy the same atomic sites [10

10. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, and F. Priolo, “Enhanced down conversion of photons emitted by photoexcited ErxY2-xSi2O7 films grown on silicon,” Phys. Rev. B 81(4), 041411 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. In addition Y is optically inactive and the optical properties depend entirely on Er. Internal gain in a ridge waveguide and electroluminescence have already been demonstrated in these compounds [11

11. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, F. Iacona, G. Franzò, A. Irrera, A. M. Piro, C. Bongiorno, and F. Priolo, “Efficient luminescence and energy transfer in erbium silicate thin films,” Adv. Mater. 19(12), 1582–1588 (2007). [CrossRef]

13

13. Y. Yin, W. J. Xu, F. Wei, G. Z. Ran, G. G. Qin, Y. F. Shi, Q. G. Yao, and S. D. Yao, “Room temperature Er 3+ 1.54 µm electroluminescence from Si-rich erbium silicate deposited by magnetron sputtering,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43, 335102 (2010).

], which encourages further developments.

The device engineering approach consists of the optical emission enhancement via the strong confinement of electromagnetic fields in a small volume that contains the optically active centers. For example, light emission enhancement in crystalline Si photonic crystal (PhC) cavities was demonstrated as a combination of the Purcell effect and the increase of the extraction efficiency [14

14. S. Iwamoto, Y. Arakawa, and A. Gomyo, “Observation of enhanced photoluminescence from silicon photonic crystal nanocavity at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(21), 211104 (2007). [CrossRef]

17

17. A. Shakoor, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, S. L. Portalupi, D. Gerace, K. Welna, S. Boninelli, G. Franzò, F. Priolo, T. F. Krauss, M. Galli, and L. O’Faolain, “Room temperature all-silicon photonic crystal nanocavity light emitting diode at sub-bandgap wavelengths,” Laser Photonics Rev. 7(1), 114–121 (2013). [CrossRef]

]. This approach has also been used successfully to enhance the optical emission of Er atoms by coupling them with photonic crystals [18

18. M. Galli, A. Politi, M. Belotti, D. Gerace, M. Liscidini, M. Patrini, L. C. Andreani, M. Miritello, A. Irrera, F. Priolo, and Y. Chen, “Strong enhancement of Er3+ emission at room temperature in silicon-on-insulator photonic crystal waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(25), 251114 (2006). [CrossRef]

] and high-Q optical cavity modes, such as microdisks [19

19. T. J. Kippenberg, J. Kalkman, A. Polman, and K. J. Vahala, “Demonstration of an erbium-doped microdisk laser on a silicon chip,” Phys. Rev. A 74(5), 051802 (2006). [CrossRef]

] and microtoroids [20

20. J. Kalkman, A. Tchebotareva, A. Polman, T. J. Kippenberg, B. Min, and K. J. Vahala, “Fabrication and characterization of erbium-doped toroidal microcavity lasers,” J. Appl. Phys. 99(8), 083103 (2006). [CrossRef]

,21

21. H.-S. Hsu, C. Cai, and A. M. Armani, “Ultra-low-threshold Er:Yb sol-gel microlaser on silicon,” Opt. Express 17(25), 23265–23271 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]; stimulated emission and linewidth narrowing have also been observed [22

22. Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, L. Dal Negro, and J. Vuckovic, “Observation of Transparency of Erbium-doped Silicon nitride in photonic crystal nanobeam cavities,” Opt. Express 18(13), 13863–13873 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,23

23. Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, R. H. Hadfield, S. N. Dorenbos, V. Zwiller, J. Vuckovic, and L. Dal Negro, “Linewidth narrowing and Purcell enhancement in photonic crystal cavities on an Er-doped silicon nitride platform,” Opt. Express 18(3), 2601–2612 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. All of these results were realised in insulating materials, however, and not in silicon; moreover, the active atoms had a maximum concentration limited by the typical values of Er doping in insulators- of the order of 1020 at/cm3.

In this study, we combine both approaches and couple the 1.54 μm emission of Er atoms with the optical modes of an L3 silicon PhC cavity by depositing a very thin Y-Er disilicate layer (≈10 nm) on top of the photonic structure. Our approach presents two main advantages: (i) the novel active material allows us to fine-control the Er concentration, with the possibility of increasing the number of emitting atoms up to the maximum concentration of 1022 at/cm3; (ii) the photonic structures are fully fabricated in crystalline silicon, allowing us to create high quality factor and small volume cavities. We demonstrate an enhancement of the Er emission due to the coupling with the cavity fundamental modes and show that the maximum Er concentration in the excited state is about 30%.

2. Samples design and fabrication

The photonic structures studied here are L3 cavities, formed in a PhC slab by removing three holes from the Γ-Κ direction of a triangular lattice. The lattice constant (a) was varied between 405 and 430 nm in steps of 1 nm to fine-tune the cavity resonance wavelength, while the hole radius (r) was kept at fixed ratio r/a = 0.275. This wide parameter-range was chosen to tune the fundamental cavity mode around 1.54 μm and to allow for the modification of the resonance wavelength induced by the deposition of the silicate thin film. The two holes closest to the cavity in the Γ-Κ direction (circled in blue in Fig. 1(b)
Fig. 1 (a) Cross-section scheme of the top-coated Si PhC membrane. (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of a top-coated L3 cavity, after the Y-Er disilicate deposition and following thermal treatment. Blue-dashed circles indicate the holes shrunk and displaced to increase the Q-factor, while red-dashed circles indicate the holes enlarged by ∆r to enhance the far-field vertical coupling.
below) were shrunk and displaced in order to increase the cavity quality factor (Q-factor) [24

24. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425(6961), 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Moreover, we applied the far-field optimization technique to improve out-of-plane coupling [25

25. S. L. Portalupi, M. Galli, C. Reardon, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and D. Gerace, “Planar photonic crystal cavities with far-field optimization for high coupling efficiency and quality factor,” Opt. Express 18(15), 16064–16073 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], by modifying the radius of the holes close to the cavity (see larger holes circled in red in Fig. 1(b) below). In particular, if we define Δr as the radius modification, cavities with Δr = 0, + 6, and + 21 nm were fabricated with the Δr = 0 nm devices acting as a reference. In principle, since we keep r/a fixed in the lithographic tuning, we should also scale Δr with the lattice constant – however, since the relative variation is only a few percent and is below the resolution of the lithography, for simplicity we keep Δr fixed.

Photonic crystal lattices of 10 × 10 μm2 size were fabricated by e-beam lithography and reactive ion etching on a SOI substrate (220 nm thick c-Si on top of 2000 nm thick SiO2). Afterwards the oxide layer underneath the PhC slab was removed by HF to form a free-standing membrane, see [26

26. C. P. Reardon, I. H. Rey, K. Welna, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Fabrication and characterization of photonic crystal slow light waveguides and cavities,” J. Vis. Exp. (69): e50216 (2012), doi:. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] for more details.

The structures were then coated by a 10 nm thick Y-Er disilicate film. The film was deposited by magnetron sputtering in an ultra-high-vacuum chamber by co-sputtering from Y2O3, Er2O3, and SiO2 targets arranged in a confocal geometry. During the deposition, the substrate was heated to 400 °C. Following deposition, the samples were annealed at 1250 °C for 30 seconds in an O2 ambient to induce crystallization of the film and to improve the optical emission at 1.54 μm through the reduction of non-radiative decay channels [11

11. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, F. Iacona, G. Franzò, A. Irrera, A. M. Piro, C. Bongiorno, and F. Priolo, “Efficient luminescence and energy transfer in erbium silicate thin films,” Adv. Mater. 19(12), 1582–1588 (2007). [CrossRef]

,27

27. R. Lo Savio, M. Miritello, A. M. Piro, F. Priolo, and F. Iacona, “The influence of stoichiometry on the structural stability and on the optical emission of erbium silicate thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 021919 (2008). [CrossRef]

].

The film composition was evaluated by Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry, confirming that the deposited film had a disilicate-like stoichiometry ([Y + Er]:[Si]:[O] = 2:2:7), with an Er concentration of 8 × 1020 Er/cm3 (corresponding to 1.2 at.%). A schematic cross-section view of the final device is shown in Fig. 1(a), while a scanning electron micrograph of a finished L3 cavity is shown in Fig. 1(b). The Si membrane is intact, even after the high-T annealing.

3. Photoluminescence analysis

3.1 Er coupling with L3 cavity modes

Er emission from bare SOI material and from L3 cavities was measured at room temperature by using a confocal micro-photoluminescence (μPL) setup. Er atoms were resonantly excited by a diode laser operating at 980 nm and focused to a spot of about 1 μm diameter by a high numerical aperture (NA = 0.8) microscope objective. The relative position between the laser spot and the sample was controlled with piezoelectric nanopositioners. The emission is collected through the same objective and sent to an InGaAs detector equipped with two diffraction grating monochromators to afford different spectral resolutions.

The pump laser has a wavelength resonant with the 4I15/24I11/2 transition of Er; the excited atoms quickly undergo the non-radiative transition to 4I13/2, and then radiatively de-excite to the ground state 4I15/2 with the emission of photons at a wavelength around 1.54 μm. The PL emission observed in Y-Er disilicate film deposited on the unpatterned SOI substrate is shown as a dashed black line in Fig. 2(a)
Fig. 2 PL emission from top-coated L3 cavities by varying (a) the lattice parameter and (b) the far-field optimization parameter. The dashed black line in (a) is the shape of PL observed in the Y-Er disilicate film.
. The lineshape is typical for Er disilicates crystallized in the α-phase; among the different possible crystalline phases of this material, the α-phase shows the highest PL intensity due to its longer lifetime [10

10. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, and F. Priolo, “Enhanced down conversion of photons emitted by photoexcited ErxY2-xSi2O7 films grown on silicon,” Phys. Rev. B 81(4), 041411 (2010). [CrossRef]

,27

27. R. Lo Savio, M. Miritello, A. M. Piro, F. Priolo, and F. Iacona, “The influence of stoichiometry on the structural stability and on the optical emission of erbium silicate thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 021919 (2008). [CrossRef]

].

When the excitation spot is moved to the center of the L3 cavity, the PL spectrum consists of a sharp peak, corresponding to the excitation of the fundamental cavity mode, superimposed on a weaker background, corresponding to the PL emission of the Er atoms in the disilicate layer coating the L3 cavity. PL spectra of far-field optimized cavities (having Δr = + 6 nm) with different lattice constants are shown in Fig. 2(a). The most intense peaks, between 1525 and 1560 nm, correspond to the fundamental cavity modes. The modes shift towards longer wavelength with increasing lattice constant, and their intensities roughly follow the PL shape of Er in disilicate film, shown as a dashed black line in the same figure.

The effect of the far-field optimization is clearly apparent in Fig. 2(b), where we show the PL spectra of three cavities with different Δr, that feature modes which are resonant with the Er emission peak. As expected, the PL of the far-field optimized cavities with Δr ≠ 0 is more intense because of the higher coupling efficiency into the collection cone of the microscope objective. At the same time, the peaks are broader by increasing Δr as a consequence of the reduced Q-factor [25

25. S. L. Portalupi, M. Galli, C. Reardon, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and D. Gerace, “Planar photonic crystal cavities with far-field optimization for high coupling efficiency and quality factor,” Opt. Express 18(15), 16064–16073 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However PL analysis is not the most accurate technique to measure high-Q factor cavities, since the maximum value is limited to about 15000, due to the spectral resolution of the diffraction gratings. Therefore their values were measured using the resonant scattering technique [28

28. M. Galli, S. L. Portalupi, M. Belotti, L. C. Andreani, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Light scattering and Fano resonances in high-Q photonic crystal nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(7), 071101 (2009). [CrossRef]

] (data not shown), yielding Q = 26000, 16200, and 4000 for Δr = 0, + 6, and + 21 nm, respectively. The Q-factors of the far-field optimized cavities are comparable with the values measured before the coating process, while a 2-fold decrease is observed for the higher Q-factor reference structure (Δr = 0 nm), where the higher optical losses induced by the disilicate are more apparent. Therefore, the coating layer does not appear to have a detrimental effect on the Q-factor of the far-field optimized cavities. The PL emission is enhanced by about two orders of magnitude in all the investigated samples, as estimated by the peak-to-background ratios in Fig. 2(b). This is due to a combination of the increased extraction efficiency given by the presence of the photonic crystal pattern, and the Purcell effect given by the coupling with the cavity modes. We note that this enhancement, is comparable to the best values from L3 PhC cavities reported previously [14

14. S. Iwamoto, Y. Arakawa, and A. Gomyo, “Observation of enhanced photoluminescence from silicon photonic crystal nanocavity at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(21), 211104 (2007). [CrossRef]

,16

16. R. Lo Savio, S. L. Portalupi, D. Gerace, A. Shakoor, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and M. Galli, “Room-temperature emission at telecom wavelengths from silicon photonic crystal nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(20), 201106 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. Finally the structure with Δr = + 6 nm exhibits the strongest PL as a result of the best trade-off between the increased vertical coupling and the reduced Q-factor, and we only consider this in the following.

3.2 Concentration of excited Er in cavity

Through the analysis of PL spectra we estimate that only the 75% of the emitted power comes from the Er coupled to the cavity mode (the remaining 25% was attributed to the background PL). The absorption loss of the acquisition line of the setup (31%) was evaluated by directly measuring the transmittance at 1540 nm of the dichroic mirrors and the optical filters. The absorption loss of the microscope objective (35%) was measured by directly measuring the transmission of a 1540 nm laser light. The fraction of light that can be collected by the microscope objective was evaluated through FDTD methods (by using commercial software from Lumerical Solutions), integrating the far-field profile emission over an angle corresponding to the collection angle of the objective [25

25. S. L. Portalupi, M. Galli, C. Reardon, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and D. Gerace, “Planar photonic crystal cavities with far-field optimization for high coupling efficiency and quality factor,” Opt. Express 18(15), 16064–16073 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], yielding about 60%. Finally, only the photons emitted in the upper plane, that is the 50% of the total, can be collected by the objective, and then directly measured.

Following it, the estimated maximum power emitted by Er atoms coupled to the cavity mode is about 85 pW, over a very narrow peak (∆λ = 0.15 nm). The trend of the emitted power as a function of incident pump power is shown in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 PL emission vs pump power. The dashed red line is not a fit and is derived from Eq. (2). The dashed blue line is the calculated trend of the excited Er fraction in presence of Yb. The population inversion threshold is indicated as a green line.
. If we consider the pump power absorbed by Er ions, the efficiency is 0.9% for 12 mW; but given the sub-linear trend, this value further increases at lower pump powers.

In order to check the reliability of our estimated values we calculate the excited Er fraction starting from the Er rate equations. In the pump power range we investigated, the PL trend is sub-linear, suggesting that up-conversion processes that deplete the first excited level are occurring [31

31. G. N. van den Hoven, E. Snoeks, A. Polman, C. van Dam, J. W. M. van Uffelen, and M. K. Smit, “Upconversion in Er-implanted Al2O3 waveguides,” J. Appl. Phys. 79(3), 1258–1266 (1996). [CrossRef]

]. The rate equation of the first excited Er level in the two-level approximation (i.e., by assuming that all Er atoms resonantly excited by the pump to the 4I11/2 level relax to the 4I13/2 instantaneously), including the up-conversion term, is as follows:

dN1(t)dt=σφ(NEr-N1(t))-N1τ-C[N1(t)]2.
(1)

N1(φ)=12Cτ[1+σφτ(2+4CNErτ+σφτ)-(1+σφτ)].
(2)

The only parameter we cannot directly measure is the up-conversion coefficient C; it can be extrapolated from the values reported in ref [10

10. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, and F. Priolo, “Enhanced down conversion of photons emitted by photoexcited ErxY2-xSi2O7 films grown on silicon,” Phys. Rev. B 81(4), 041411 (2010). [CrossRef]

], giving C = 1.3 × 10−16 cm3/s. Substituting all the parameters in Eq. (2) we can calculate the excited Er concentration as a function of the pumping flux; the resulting trend is the dashed red curve in Fig. 4. We achieved a good agreement with the experimental data, up to 12 mW, thus confirming our estimation of the excited Er concentration. Note that the PL decrease for P > 12 mW is attributed to the detrimental effects of the underlying Si photonic crystal.

Alternatively, the fraction of excited Er can also be increased by the replacement of optically inactive yttrium with ytterbium, determining an enhancement by one order of magnitude of the excitation cross section [21

21. H.-S. Hsu, C. Cai, and A. M. Armani, “Ultra-low-threshold Er:Yb sol-gel microlaser on silicon,” Opt. Express 17(25), 23265–23271 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,32

32. M. Miritello, P. Cardile, R. Lo Savio, and F. Priolo, “Energy transfer and enhanced 1.54 μm emission in erbium-ytterbium disilicate thin films,” Opt. Express 19(21), 20761–20772 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The calculated trend of excited Er fraction as a function of incident flux in presence of Yb is shown as a dashed blue line in Fig. 4; in this case, the population inversion threshold could be reached already at the maximum pump flux allowed by the photonic structure studied here.

4. Time-resolved photoluminescence and Purcell effect

The Er PL enhancement is only an indirect signature of the Purcell effect that occurs when Er atoms are coupled to a cavity mode; a direct proof requires measuring the change in lifetime [33

33. E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681–681 (1946).

]. We measured the lifetime at room temperature on a setup similar to that used for μPL. The exciting laser was mechanically chopped at 30 Hz to give a square-wave pump signal, and the collected light was sent to a superconducting single photon detector (SSPD) cooled to 4.2 K, that produces an output voltage each time a photon is absorbed. The lifetime is recorded via the time-correlated single photon counting technique.

Figure 5
Fig. 5 Decay curves of fundamental cavity mode PL (black curve); PL collected from the PhC lattice outside the cavity region (red line). The dashed green line is the best fit of the black curve obtained by using Eq. (3).
shows two decay curves obtained under different conditions. The black curve represents the decay of the cavity resonance PL, obtained by spectrally selecting the narrow cavity peak only. The red curve is the time decay of the emission collected from Er atoms on the PhC lattice outside the cavity region; the signal was collected from a 1500-1800 nm transmission window.

At first glance, all of the curves show a non-single exponential behavior; we attribute this to the presence of up-conversion processes [31

31. G. N. van den Hoven, E. Snoeks, A. Polman, C. van Dam, J. W. M. van Uffelen, and M. K. Smit, “Upconversion in Er-implanted Al2O3 waveguides,” J. Appl. Phys. 79(3), 1258–1266 (1996). [CrossRef]

], although the decay curves were acquired at the lowest possible pump power in order to reduce the Er-Er interactions as much as possible. In order to extract the lifetime values, the experimental curves must then be fitted by using the solution of Eq. (1), when the external pump is switched off (corresponding to the case σ = 0).

I1(t)I(0)=1(1+N1(0)C×τ)et/τ-N1(0)C×τ.
(3)

In this case the fitting parameters are the lifetime τ, and the product N1(0)C between the excited Er concentration when the laser is switched-off and the up-conversion coefficient. From Fig. 5, the corresponding lifetime of Er atoms coupled to the cavity mode is the shortest (2.1 ms); if we move the laser spot away from the cavity region into the PhC lattice, the lifetime is increased to 3.0 ms. The decay rate for Er in PhC is given by the reciprocal sum of radiative (R) and non-radiative (nR) lifetime:

(1τ)PhC=1τR+1τnR.
(4)

The radiative decay rate of Er in cavity is increased by the Purcell effect through the Purcell factor FP, and Eq. (4) is modified into:

(1τ)cav=FP1τR+1τnR.
(5)

Then, in order to estimate the FP values in our system we can compare the lifetime of Er in cavity and in PhC, supposing that non-radiative lifetime is the same in both cases. This is true since the main non-radiative decay channel in Er-containing insulating host is the concentration quenching due to Er-Er energy transfer [34

34. E. Snoeks, P. G. Kik, and A. Polman, “Concentration quenching in erbium implanted alkali silicate glasses,” Opt. Mater. 5(3), 159–167 (1996). [CrossRef]

]. This process depends only on the Er-Er mean distance and then it is not influenced by the dielectric environment.

FP=[(1τ)cav-(1τ)PhC]τR+1.
(6)

Unfortunately it is not possible to estimate the radiative lifetime from the time decay measurements, since the Er concentration is too high to neglect non-radiative decay channels, such as concentration quenching [34

34. E. Snoeks, P. G. Kik, and A. Polman, “Concentration quenching in erbium implanted alkali silicate glasses,” Opt. Mater. 5(3), 159–167 (1996). [CrossRef]

]. Its value must be deduced following some approximations. As a starting point we consider the measured radiative lifetime of Er in a bulk Y2O3 (8 ms) [35

35. M. J. Weber, “Radiative and multiphonon relaxation of rare-earth ions in Y2O3,” Phys. Rev. 171(2), 283–291 (1968). [CrossRef]

]. The radiative lifetime of Er embedded in a homogeneous medium depends only on the refractive index of the host mateial, following an inverse squared dependence [36

36. W. Fowler and D. Dexter, “Relation between absorption and emission probabilities in luminescent centers in ionic solids,” Phys. Rev. 128(5), 2154–2165 (1962). [CrossRef]

]; since the refractive indexes of the Y-Er disilicate film and Y2O3 are 1.77 and 1.9 respectively [10

10. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, and F. Priolo, “Enhanced down conversion of photons emitted by photoexcited ErxY2-xSi2O7 films grown on silicon,” Phys. Rev. B 81(4), 041411 (2010). [CrossRef]

], then we estimate radiative lifetime of Er in disilicate to be 9 ms. Further modifications of the lifetime τR due to placing the disilicate on top of the Si layer, which reduces the lifetime by a factor of about 1.4 [37

37. C. Creatore, L. C. Andreani, M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, and F. Priolo, “Modification of erbium radiative lifetime in planar silicon slot waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(10), 103112 (2009). [CrossRef]

], and due to interaction of the Er emission with the photonic bandgap of the underlying PhC, which increases the lifetime by about the same amount, nearly compensate each other and lead to a small error bar in the estimation.

This finally gives us FP ≈2.3 ± 0.3, comparable to that reported for a L3 PhC cavity fully fabricated in Er-doped silicon nitride [23

23. Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, R. H. Hadfield, S. N. Dorenbos, V. Zwiller, J. Vuckovic, and L. Dal Negro, “Linewidth narrowing and Purcell enhancement in photonic crystal cavities on an Er-doped silicon nitride platform,” Opt. Express 18(3), 2601–2612 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This means that the radiative lifetime of the Er atoms coupled to the cavity mode (τR,cav) is further reduced to 4 ms.

The spontaneous emission rate enhancement of a single dipole, spectrally and spatially matched to the electric field antinode of a generic photonic cavity, is ideally given by the well-known Purcell expression
FP,ideal=3(λ/n)3Q2Veff.
(7)
where the effective cavity mode volume is consistently defined as [38

38. L. C. Andreani, G. Panzarini, and J. M. Gerard, “Strong-coupling regime for quantum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory,” Phys. Rev. B 60(19), 13276–13279 (1999). [CrossRef]

40

40. J. M. Gérard, “Solid-State Cavity-Quantum Electrodynamics with Self-Assembled Quantum Dots,” Top. Appl. Phys. 90, 269–314 (2003). [CrossRef]

]:
Veff=ε(r)|E(r)|2drε(rmax)|E(rmax)|2.
(8)
In the latter expression rmax is the position that maximizes the product ε(r)|E(r)|2. In our case, we can assume that the active medium is made of a uniformly distributed ensemble of narrow-line emitters. Indeed, the overall emission linewidth of Er atoms in insulating hosts is determined by inhomogenous or Stark splitting of the extremely narrow atomic transitions between the different multiplets involved in the 4I13/24I15/2 decay [29

29. P. C. Becker, N. A. Olsson, and J. R. Simpson, Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: Fundamentals and Technology (Academic, 1999)

]. The long radiative lifetime, in the millisecond range, clearly supports this hypothesis. We can then assume that the emitter linewidth is much smaller than the cavity mode, and apply a generalized expression for the Purcell factor that only depends on the cavity Q-factor [40

40. J. M. Gérard, “Solid-State Cavity-Quantum Electrodynamics with Self-Assembled Quantum Dots,” Top. Appl. Phys. 90, 269–314 (2003). [CrossRef]

]:
FP=3λ3Q2nεmaxVeff13p(r)|f(r)|2dr.
(9)
This expression fully takes into account the convolution of the spatial distribution function of the active dipoles, p(r), with the cavity mode spatial profile, here consistently defined as f(r) = E(r)/|E(rmax)|, and where the factor 1/3 in the integral accounts for the random orientation of the dipole emitters. Although local-field effect may have an influence on the radiative lifetime in a dielectric medium, depending on the details of the local surrounding of the impurity [41

41. G. L. J. A. Rikken and Y. A. R. R. Kessener, “Local field effects and electric and magnetic dipole transitions in dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(6), 880–883 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], in the present case the local-field effects are implicitly included in the radiative lifetime of Er in the silicate matrix. Notice that the “local” surrounding is defined on a scale of a few lattice constants, and is unaffected by a material thickness of 10 nm: thus, the local-field effect gives no corrections to our measured or calculated Purcell factor.

To estimate the expected Purcell enhancement in our system we apply Eq. (9) to the L3 photonic crystal cavity corresponding to the measured device. The electric field profile is calculated with the FDTD method, by using commercial software from Lumerical Solutions. We assume uniformly distributed Er active centers on the surface of the cavity, with a layer thickness of 10 nm. The result is an estimated Purcell factor of FP ≈3.2, close to the experimentally determined value.

The relatively low Purcell factor as compared to the ideal value FP,ideal of Eq. (7) follows from three effects: (i) the polarization factor 1/3, as the Er emitter dipoles are randomly oriented; (ii) the uniform spatial distribution of the dipoles in the plane, instead of having dipoles at the cavity center; (iii) the non-optimal location of Er layer on top of the silicon slab, instead of having dipoles at the middle of the slab. All these effects are contained in the formula (9) and are taken into account in the FDTD evaluation of the Purcell factor. Effect (iii) could be overcome by fabricating similar PhC cavities in which the active material is placed inside the crystalline silicon, in order to improve the overlap between the active layer and the cavity region, by using e.g. vertical slot waveguides [42

42. Q. Xu, V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material,” Opt. Lett. 29(14), 1626–1628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]: this solution would be especially advantageous, as it would also reduce the effective volume Veff by the slot effect leading to enhanced electric fields in the slot region.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully demonstrated coupling between Er atoms and the optical modes of an L3 photonic crystal cavity realized in crystalline silicon by coating the cavity with a thin Y-Er disilicate layer. The PL of Er atoms in the cavity region is enhanced by the increased extraction efficiency and the Purcell effect, the extraction efficiency being maximized using far-field optimization. By measuring the emitted power, we estimate that 30% of Er population is excited; this opens the route for further improvements through an optimization of both active material and photonic structure. The Purcell factor that we extract from time-resolved photoluminescence measurements is FP ≈2.3, close to the calculated value of FP ≈3.2. However, we expect FP to increase in optimized PhC cavities in which the active material can be inserted spatially closer to the region of highest field confinement. Finally since our photonic structure is fully fabricated in crystalline silicon and coated with a very thin insulating layer, it is possible, in principle, to fabricate an electroluminescent device. The Er atoms could be excited through an impact excitation mechanism, with carriers tunneling through the active layer, a scheme that has already been used to demonstrate electroluminescence in other silicate-based devices [13

13. Y. Yin, W. J. Xu, F. Wei, G. Z. Ran, G. G. Qin, Y. F. Shi, Q. G. Yao, and S. D. Yao, “Room temperature Er 3+ 1.54 µm electroluminescence from Si-rich erbium silicate deposited by magnetron sputtering,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43, 335102 (2010).

]. This would greatly broaden the range of applications for the present Si-based nanoemitters opening the route to the development of small-sized Er light source and amplifiers.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Era-NET NanoSci LECSIN project coordinated by F. Priolo, by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, and the UK EPSRC UK Silicon Photonics project. The fabrication was carried out in the framework of NanoPiX (see http://www.nanophotonics.eu).

References and links

1.

J. M. Shainline and J. Xu, “Silicon as an emissive optical medium,” Laser Photonics Rev. 1(4), 334–348 (2007). [CrossRef]

2.

D. Liang and J. E. Bowers, “Recent progress in lasers on silicon,” Nat. Photonics 4(8), 511–517 (2010). [CrossRef]

3.

G. Franzò, F. Priolo, S. Coffa, A. Polman, and A. Carnera, “Room-temperature electroluminescence from Er-doped crystalline Si,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(17), 2235–2237 (1994). [CrossRef]

4.

G. Davies, “The optical properties of luminescent centres in silicon,” Phys. Rep. 176(3-4), 83–188 (1989). [CrossRef]

5.

W. L. Ng, M. A. Lourenço, R. M. Gwilliam, S. Ledain, G. Shao, and K. P. Homewood, “An efficient room-temperature silicon-based light-emitting diode,” Nature 410(6825), 192–194 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

S. G. Cloutier, P. A. Kossyrev, and J. M. Xu, “Optical gain and stimulated emission in periodic nanopatterned crystalline silicon,” Nat. Mater. 4(12), 887–891 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

H. Ennen, J. Schneider, G. Pomrenke, and A. Axmann, “1.54-µm luminescence of erbium-implanted III-V semiconductors and silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 43(10), 943–945 (1983). [CrossRef]

8.

A. Polman, G. N. van den Hoven, J. S. Custer, J. H. Shin, R. Serna, and P. F. A. Alkemade, “Erbium in crystal silicon: optical activation, excitation, and concentration limits,” J. Appl. Phys. 77(3), 1256–1262 (1995). [CrossRef]

9.

S. Coffa, G. Franzò, F. Priolo, A. Polman, and R. Serna, “Temperature dependence and quenching processes of the intra-4f luminescence of Er in crystalline Si,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 49(23), 16313–16320 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, and F. Priolo, “Enhanced down conversion of photons emitted by photoexcited ErxY2-xSi2O7 films grown on silicon,” Phys. Rev. B 81(4), 041411 (2010). [CrossRef]

11.

M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, F. Iacona, G. Franzò, A. Irrera, A. M. Piro, C. Bongiorno, and F. Priolo, “Efficient luminescence and energy transfer in erbium silicate thin films,” Adv. Mater. 19(12), 1582–1588 (2007). [CrossRef]

12.

K. Suh, M. Lee, J. S. Chang, H. Lee, N. Park, G. Y. Sung, and J. H. Shin, “Cooperative upconversion and optical gain in ion-beam sputter-deposited ErxY2-xSiO5 waveguides,” Opt. Express 18(8), 7724–7731 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

Y. Yin, W. J. Xu, F. Wei, G. Z. Ran, G. G. Qin, Y. F. Shi, Q. G. Yao, and S. D. Yao, “Room temperature Er 3+ 1.54 µm electroluminescence from Si-rich erbium silicate deposited by magnetron sputtering,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43, 335102 (2010).

14.

S. Iwamoto, Y. Arakawa, and A. Gomyo, “Observation of enhanced photoluminescence from silicon photonic crystal nanocavity at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(21), 211104 (2007). [CrossRef]

15.

M. Fujita, Y. Tanaka, and S. Noda, “Light emission from silicon in photonic crystal nanocavity,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14(4), 1090–1097 (2008). [CrossRef]

16.

R. Lo Savio, S. L. Portalupi, D. Gerace, A. Shakoor, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and M. Galli, “Room-temperature emission at telecom wavelengths from silicon photonic crystal nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(20), 201106 (2011). [CrossRef]

17.

A. Shakoor, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, S. L. Portalupi, D. Gerace, K. Welna, S. Boninelli, G. Franzò, F. Priolo, T. F. Krauss, M. Galli, and L. O’Faolain, “Room temperature all-silicon photonic crystal nanocavity light emitting diode at sub-bandgap wavelengths,” Laser Photonics Rev. 7(1), 114–121 (2013). [CrossRef]

18.

M. Galli, A. Politi, M. Belotti, D. Gerace, M. Liscidini, M. Patrini, L. C. Andreani, M. Miritello, A. Irrera, F. Priolo, and Y. Chen, “Strong enhancement of Er3+ emission at room temperature in silicon-on-insulator photonic crystal waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(25), 251114 (2006). [CrossRef]

19.

T. J. Kippenberg, J. Kalkman, A. Polman, and K. J. Vahala, “Demonstration of an erbium-doped microdisk laser on a silicon chip,” Phys. Rev. A 74(5), 051802 (2006). [CrossRef]

20.

J. Kalkman, A. Tchebotareva, A. Polman, T. J. Kippenberg, B. Min, and K. J. Vahala, “Fabrication and characterization of erbium-doped toroidal microcavity lasers,” J. Appl. Phys. 99(8), 083103 (2006). [CrossRef]

21.

H.-S. Hsu, C. Cai, and A. M. Armani, “Ultra-low-threshold Er:Yb sol-gel microlaser on silicon,” Opt. Express 17(25), 23265–23271 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, L. Dal Negro, and J. Vuckovic, “Observation of Transparency of Erbium-doped Silicon nitride in photonic crystal nanobeam cavities,” Opt. Express 18(13), 13863–13873 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, R. H. Hadfield, S. N. Dorenbos, V. Zwiller, J. Vuckovic, and L. Dal Negro, “Linewidth narrowing and Purcell enhancement in photonic crystal cavities on an Er-doped silicon nitride platform,” Opt. Express 18(3), 2601–2612 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature 425(6961), 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

S. L. Portalupi, M. Galli, C. Reardon, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and D. Gerace, “Planar photonic crystal cavities with far-field optimization for high coupling efficiency and quality factor,” Opt. Express 18(15), 16064–16073 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26.

C. P. Reardon, I. H. Rey, K. Welna, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Fabrication and characterization of photonic crystal slow light waveguides and cavities,” J. Vis. Exp. (69): e50216 (2012), doi:. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

R. Lo Savio, M. Miritello, A. M. Piro, F. Priolo, and F. Iacona, “The influence of stoichiometry on the structural stability and on the optical emission of erbium silicate thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(2), 021919 (2008). [CrossRef]

28.

M. Galli, S. L. Portalupi, M. Belotti, L. C. Andreani, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Light scattering and Fano resonances in high-Q photonic crystal nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(7), 071101 (2009). [CrossRef]

29.

P. C. Becker, N. A. Olsson, and J. R. Simpson, Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: Fundamentals and Technology (Academic, 1999)

30.

M. El Kurdi, X. Checoury, S. David, T. P. Ngo, N. Zerounian, P. Boucaud, O. Kermarrec, Y. Campidelli, and D. Bensahel, “Quality factor of Si-based photonic crystal L3 nanocavities probed with an internal source,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8780–8791 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

31.

G. N. van den Hoven, E. Snoeks, A. Polman, C. van Dam, J. W. M. van Uffelen, and M. K. Smit, “Upconversion in Er-implanted Al2O3 waveguides,” J. Appl. Phys. 79(3), 1258–1266 (1996). [CrossRef]

32.

M. Miritello, P. Cardile, R. Lo Savio, and F. Priolo, “Energy transfer and enhanced 1.54 μm emission in erbium-ytterbium disilicate thin films,” Opt. Express 19(21), 20761–20772 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33.

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681–681 (1946).

34.

E. Snoeks, P. G. Kik, and A. Polman, “Concentration quenching in erbium implanted alkali silicate glasses,” Opt. Mater. 5(3), 159–167 (1996). [CrossRef]

35.

M. J. Weber, “Radiative and multiphonon relaxation of rare-earth ions in Y2O3,” Phys. Rev. 171(2), 283–291 (1968). [CrossRef]

36.

W. Fowler and D. Dexter, “Relation between absorption and emission probabilities in luminescent centers in ionic solids,” Phys. Rev. 128(5), 2154–2165 (1962). [CrossRef]

37.

C. Creatore, L. C. Andreani, M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, and F. Priolo, “Modification of erbium radiative lifetime in planar silicon slot waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(10), 103112 (2009). [CrossRef]

38.

L. C. Andreani, G. Panzarini, and J. M. Gerard, “Strong-coupling regime for quantum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory,” Phys. Rev. B 60(19), 13276–13279 (1999). [CrossRef]

39.

M. Notomi, “Manipulating light with strongly modulated photonic crystals,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 73(9), 096501 (2010). [CrossRef]

40.

J. M. Gérard, “Solid-State Cavity-Quantum Electrodynamics with Self-Assembled Quantum Dots,” Top. Appl. Phys. 90, 269–314 (2003). [CrossRef]

41.

G. L. J. A. Rikken and Y. A. R. R. Kessener, “Local field effects and electric and magnetic dipole transitions in dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(6), 880–883 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

42.

Q. Xu, V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material,” Opt. Lett. 29(14), 1626–1628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(160.5690) Materials : Rare-earth-doped materials
(230.0230) Optical devices : Optical devices
(260.3800) Physical optics : Luminescence
(230.5298) Optical devices : Photonic crystals

ToC Category:
Photonic Crystals

History
Original Manuscript: December 11, 2012
Revised Manuscript: March 8, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: March 15, 2013
Published: April 18, 2013

Citation
R. Lo Savio, M. Miritello, A. Shakoor, P. Cardile, K. Welna, L. C. Andreani, D. Gerace, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, F. Priolo, and M. Galli, "Enhanced 1.54 μm emission in Y-Er disilicate thin films on silicon photonic crystal cavities," Opt. Express 21, 10278-10288 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-8-10278


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. M. Shainline and J. Xu, “Silicon as an emissive optical medium,” Laser Photonics Rev.1(4), 334–348 (2007). [CrossRef]
  2. D. Liang and J. E. Bowers, “Recent progress in lasers on silicon,” Nat. Photonics4(8), 511–517 (2010). [CrossRef]
  3. G. Franzò, F. Priolo, S. Coffa, A. Polman, and A. Carnera, “Room-temperature electroluminescence from Er-doped crystalline Si,” Appl. Phys. Lett.64(17), 2235–2237 (1994). [CrossRef]
  4. G. Davies, “The optical properties of luminescent centres in silicon,” Phys. Rep.176(3-4), 83–188 (1989). [CrossRef]
  5. W. L. Ng, M. A. Lourenço, R. M. Gwilliam, S. Ledain, G. Shao, and K. P. Homewood, “An efficient room-temperature silicon-based light-emitting diode,” Nature410(6825), 192–194 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. S. G. Cloutier, P. A. Kossyrev, and J. M. Xu, “Optical gain and stimulated emission in periodic nanopatterned crystalline silicon,” Nat. Mater.4(12), 887–891 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. H. Ennen, J. Schneider, G. Pomrenke, and A. Axmann, “1.54-µm luminescence of erbium-implanted III-V semiconductors and silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett.43(10), 943–945 (1983). [CrossRef]
  8. A. Polman, G. N. van den Hoven, J. S. Custer, J. H. Shin, R. Serna, and P. F. A. Alkemade, “Erbium in crystal silicon: optical activation, excitation, and concentration limits,” J. Appl. Phys.77(3), 1256–1262 (1995). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Coffa, G. Franzò, F. Priolo, A. Polman, and R. Serna, “Temperature dependence and quenching processes of the intra-4f luminescence of Er in crystalline Si,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter49(23), 16313–16320 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, and F. Priolo, “Enhanced down conversion of photons emitted by photoexcited ErxY2-xSi2O7 films grown on silicon,” Phys. Rev. B81(4), 041411 (2010). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, F. Iacona, G. Franzò, A. Irrera, A. M. Piro, C. Bongiorno, and F. Priolo, “Efficient luminescence and energy transfer in erbium silicate thin films,” Adv. Mater.19(12), 1582–1588 (2007). [CrossRef]
  12. K. Suh, M. Lee, J. S. Chang, H. Lee, N. Park, G. Y. Sung, and J. H. Shin, “Cooperative upconversion and optical gain in ion-beam sputter-deposited ErxY2-xSiO5 waveguides,” Opt. Express18(8), 7724–7731 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Y. Yin, W. J. Xu, F. Wei, G. Z. Ran, G. G. Qin, Y. F. Shi, Q. G. Yao, and S. D. Yao, “Room temperature Er 3+ 1.54 µm electroluminescence from Si-rich erbium silicate deposited by magnetron sputtering,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.43, 335102 (2010).
  14. S. Iwamoto, Y. Arakawa, and A. Gomyo, “Observation of enhanced photoluminescence from silicon photonic crystal nanocavity at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett.91(21), 211104 (2007). [CrossRef]
  15. M. Fujita, Y. Tanaka, and S. Noda, “Light emission from silicon in photonic crystal nanocavity,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.14(4), 1090–1097 (2008). [CrossRef]
  16. R. Lo Savio, S. L. Portalupi, D. Gerace, A. Shakoor, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and M. Galli, “Room-temperature emission at telecom wavelengths from silicon photonic crystal nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett.98(20), 201106 (2011). [CrossRef]
  17. A. Shakoor, R. Lo Savio, P. Cardile, S. L. Portalupi, D. Gerace, K. Welna, S. Boninelli, G. Franzò, F. Priolo, T. F. Krauss, M. Galli, and L. O’Faolain, “Room temperature all-silicon photonic crystal nanocavity light emitting diode at sub-bandgap wavelengths,” Laser Photonics Rev.7(1), 114–121 (2013). [CrossRef]
  18. M. Galli, A. Politi, M. Belotti, D. Gerace, M. Liscidini, M. Patrini, L. C. Andreani, M. Miritello, A. Irrera, F. Priolo, and Y. Chen, “Strong enhancement of Er3+ emission at room temperature in silicon-on-insulator photonic crystal waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett.88(25), 251114 (2006). [CrossRef]
  19. T. J. Kippenberg, J. Kalkman, A. Polman, and K. J. Vahala, “Demonstration of an erbium-doped microdisk laser on a silicon chip,” Phys. Rev. A74(5), 051802 (2006). [CrossRef]
  20. J. Kalkman, A. Tchebotareva, A. Polman, T. J. Kippenberg, B. Min, and K. J. Vahala, “Fabrication and characterization of erbium-doped toroidal microcavity lasers,” J. Appl. Phys.99(8), 083103 (2006). [CrossRef]
  21. H.-S. Hsu, C. Cai, and A. M. Armani, “Ultra-low-threshold Er:Yb sol-gel microlaser on silicon,” Opt. Express17(25), 23265–23271 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, L. Dal Negro, and J. Vuckovic, “Observation of Transparency of Erbium-doped Silicon nitride in photonic crystal nanobeam cavities,” Opt. Express18(13), 13863–13873 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Y. Gong, M. Makarova, S. Yerci, R. Li, M. J. Stevens, B. Baek, S. W. Nam, R. H. Hadfield, S. N. Dorenbos, V. Zwiller, J. Vuckovic, and L. Dal Negro, “Linewidth narrowing and Purcell enhancement in photonic crystal cavities on an Er-doped silicon nitride platform,” Opt. Express18(3), 2601–2612 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, “High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal,” Nature425(6961), 944–947 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. S. L. Portalupi, M. Galli, C. Reardon, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, L. C. Andreani, and D. Gerace, “Planar photonic crystal cavities with far-field optimization for high coupling efficiency and quality factor,” Opt. Express18(15), 16064–16073 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. C. P. Reardon, I. H. Rey, K. Welna, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Fabrication and characterization of photonic crystal slow light waveguides and cavities,” J. Vis. Exp. (69): e50216 (2012), doi:. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. R. Lo Savio, M. Miritello, A. M. Piro, F. Priolo, and F. Iacona, “The influence of stoichiometry on the structural stability and on the optical emission of erbium silicate thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett.93(2), 021919 (2008). [CrossRef]
  28. M. Galli, S. L. Portalupi, M. Belotti, L. C. Andreani, L. O’Faolain, and T. F. Krauss, “Light scattering and Fano resonances in high-Q photonic crystal nanocavities,” Appl. Phys. Lett.94(7), 071101 (2009). [CrossRef]
  29. P. C. Becker, N. A. Olsson, and J. R. Simpson, Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: Fundamentals and Technology (Academic, 1999)
  30. M. El Kurdi, X. Checoury, S. David, T. P. Ngo, N. Zerounian, P. Boucaud, O. Kermarrec, Y. Campidelli, and D. Bensahel, “Quality factor of Si-based photonic crystal L3 nanocavities probed with an internal source,” Opt. Express16(12), 8780–8791 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. G. N. van den Hoven, E. Snoeks, A. Polman, C. van Dam, J. W. M. van Uffelen, and M. K. Smit, “Upconversion in Er-implanted Al2O3 waveguides,” J. Appl. Phys.79(3), 1258–1266 (1996). [CrossRef]
  32. M. Miritello, P. Cardile, R. Lo Savio, and F. Priolo, “Energy transfer and enhanced 1.54 μm emission in erbium-ytterbium disilicate thin films,” Opt. Express19(21), 20761–20772 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev.69, 681–681 (1946).
  34. E. Snoeks, P. G. Kik, and A. Polman, “Concentration quenching in erbium implanted alkali silicate glasses,” Opt. Mater.5(3), 159–167 (1996). [CrossRef]
  35. M. J. Weber, “Radiative and multiphonon relaxation of rare-earth ions in Y2O3,” Phys. Rev.171(2), 283–291 (1968). [CrossRef]
  36. W. Fowler and D. Dexter, “Relation between absorption and emission probabilities in luminescent centers in ionic solids,” Phys. Rev.128(5), 2154–2165 (1962). [CrossRef]
  37. C. Creatore, L. C. Andreani, M. Miritello, R. Lo Savio, and F. Priolo, “Modification of erbium radiative lifetime in planar silicon slot waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett.94(10), 103112 (2009). [CrossRef]
  38. L. C. Andreani, G. Panzarini, and J. M. Gerard, “Strong-coupling regime for quantum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory,” Phys. Rev. B60(19), 13276–13279 (1999). [CrossRef]
  39. M. Notomi, “Manipulating light with strongly modulated photonic crystals,” Rep. Prog. Phys.73(9), 096501 (2010). [CrossRef]
  40. J. M. Gérard, “Solid-State Cavity-Quantum Electrodynamics with Self-Assembled Quantum Dots,” Top. Appl. Phys.90, 269–314 (2003). [CrossRef]
  41. G. L. J. A. Rikken and Y. A. R. R. Kessener, “Local field effects and electric and magnetic dipole transitions in dielectrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.74(6), 880–883 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Q. Xu, V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Experimental demonstration of guiding and confining light in nanometer-size low-refractive-index material,” Opt. Lett.29(14), 1626–1628 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited