OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 9 — May. 6, 2013
  • pp: 10746–10752
« Show journal navigation

Tunable dual-band negative refractive index in ferrite-based metamaterials

Ke Bi, Ji Zhou, Hongjie Zhao, Xiaoming Liu, and Chuwen Lan  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 9, pp. 10746-10752 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.010746


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (3109 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A tunable dual-band ferrite-based metamaterial has been investigated by experiments and simulations. The negative permeability is realized around the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) frequency which can be influenced by the dimension of the ferrites. Due to having two negative permeability frequency regions around the two FMR frequencies, the metamaterials consisting of metallic wires and ferrite rods with different sizes possess two passbands in the transmission spectra. The microwave transmission properties of the ferrite-based metamaterials can be not only tuned by the applied magnetic field, but also adjusted by the dimension of the ferrite rods. A good agreement between experimental and simulated results is demonstrated, which confirms that the tunable dual-band ferrite-based metamaterials can be used for cloaks, antennas and absorbers.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

Since Veselago [1

1. V. G. Veselago, “The electrodynamics of substance simultaneously negative values of ε and μ,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 10(4), 509–514 (1968). [CrossRef]

] predicted the negative refractive index (NRI) material with simultaneously negative effective permittivity and permeability, these materials have been recently stimulated tremendous fundamental and practical interests because of their unusual electric and magnetic features and due to their potential applications in different regimes of the electromagnetic spectrum [2

2. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, W. J. Stewart, and I. Youngs, “Extremely low frequency plasmons in metallic mesostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(25), 4773–4776 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5

5. A. Grbic and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Periodic Analysis of a 2-D Negative Refractive Index Transmission Line Structure,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 51(10), 2604–2611 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. Because NRI materials are not found in nature, metamaterials have been a major resort to obtain NRI materials [6

6. D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, and M. C. Wiltshire, “Metamaterials and Negative Refractive Index,” Science 305(5685), 788–792 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Hence, much attention has been focused on the unusual electromagnetic properties of these metamaterials such as the reversals of both Doppler shift and Cherenkov radiation, enhancement of evanescent wave, and subwavelength resolution imaging, etc [7

7. J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(18), 3966–3969 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9

9. C. G. Parazzoli, R. B. Greegor, J. A. Nielsen, M. A. Thompson, K. Li, A. M. Vetter, M. H. Tanielian, and D. C. Vier, “Performance of a negative index of refraction lens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(17), 3232–3234 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Most up-to-date metamaterials are artificial structures, like well-known composite periodic structures composed of thin metallic wires (ε < 0) and split-ring resonators (SRRs) (μ < 0) [10

10. D. R. Smith, W. J. Padilla, D. C. Vier, S. C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, “Composite Medium with Simultaneously Negative Permeability and Permittivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(18), 4184–4187 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14

14. X. J. He, Y. Wang, Z. X. Geng, J. M. Wang, and T. L. Gui, “3D broadband isotropic NRI metamaterial based on metallic cross-pairs,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323(20), 2425–2428 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. Such metamaterials usually obtain their unique electromagnetic properties from the designed structures rather than the composition.

Dual-band and multi-band metamaterials have been drown considerable attention because of multi-frequency applications [15

15. S. Kim, H. K. Choi, J. I. Choi, and J. H. Park, “A new approach to the design of a dual-band IFA with a metamaterial unit cell,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 54(2), 545–549 (2012). [CrossRef]

17

17. Y. Liu, S. Gu, C. Luo, and X. Zhao, “Ultra-thin broadband metamaterial absorber,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 108(1), 19–24 (2012). [CrossRef]

]. Some researchers have presented some dual-band or multi-band metamaterials by designing composite structures or the same structures with different sizes to broaden the bandwidth. However, characteristic metamaterial frequency band is difficult to tune in such metamaterials, since the dimension of the periodic composite structure should be small enough compared to the wavelength which creates challenges in the fabrication [18

18. G. Dewar, “Candidates for μ < 0, ε < 0 nanostructures,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15(24n25), 3258–3265 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. Recently, new ferrite-based metamaterial structures have been reported in which negative magnetic permeability is achieved by substituting SRR elements with ferrites [19

19. L. Kang, Q. Zhao, H. J. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Ferrite-based magnetically tunable left-handed metamaterial composed of SRRs and wires,” Opt. Express 16(22), 17269–17275 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22

22. P. He, J. Gao, Y. Chen, P. V. Parimi, C. Vittoria, and V. G. Harris, “Q-band tunable negative refractive index metamaterial using Sc-doped BaM hexaferrite,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(15), 155005 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. The negative permeability appears when the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) of the ferrite taking place [23

23. F. Xu, Y. Bai, F. Ai, L. Qiao, H. J. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Realization and modulation of negative permeability using an array of hexaferrite rods,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(6), 065416 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. The FMR of the magnetic materials is influenced by a lot of factors such as the bias magnetic field, magnetocrystalline anisotropy field, and demagnetization field. Hence, we can control the characteristic metamaterial frequency band by tuning these factors. A lot of researches on the negative index frequency band shifted by adjusting the bias magnetic field have been reported, but there are few reports on frequency band influenced by shape demagnetization factor. In this work, we designed a dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterial. In order to demonstrate the microwave transmission characteristics of the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterial, a single-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterial was also prepared. The microwave transmission properties of ferrite-based metamaterials tuned by the different shape demagnetization factor were investigated by experiments and simulations.

2. Experimental

The commercial yttrium iron garnet (YIG) rods were sliced with dimensions of l × w × h mm3, where l = 0.8, 1.6, and 2.4 mm, w = 0.4 mm, h = 10 mm, respectively. Saturation magnetization 4πMs, linewidth ΔH, and relative permittivity εr of the YIG rods are 1950 Gs, 10 Oe, and 14.5, respectively. Using a shadow mask/etching technique, we prepared 0.4 mm thick FR-4 dielectric substrates (εr = 4.4 and tanδ = 0.014) with copper wires spacing of 3 mm on one side. The size of the copper wires is 0.5 × 0.03 × 10 mm3. The other 0.4 mm thick FR-4 dielectric substrates without copper wires were pasted on the side of dielectric substrates with copper wires, which made two sides of the copper wires covered by the dielectric substrates. The YIG rods with the dimension of 0.8 × 0.4 × 10 mm3 were pasted back-to-back with copper wires on one side of the substrate/wire/substrate structure. The other YIG rods with a series of dimensions were pasted on the other side of the substrate/wire/substrate structure. The dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials were obtained by assembled the rod-wire-rod units into an array, as shown in Fig. 1(a)
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of (a) dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials and (b) single-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials.
. For comparison, the single-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials were also obtained by assembled the rod-wire units into an array, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The distance d between the rods is 3 mm.

The NRI ferrite-based metamaterials were placed in an X-band rectangular waveguide WR90 (22.86 × 10.16 mm2) under various applied magnetic fields which is generated by an electromagnet along the z direction. The microwave with TE10 mode propagates along y direction with an electric field polarized along the x direction. The microwave properties were measured by an HP 8720ES network analyzer. In addition, the microwave properties of ferrite rod and ferrite-based metamaterials were simulated by using CST Microwave Studio, a Maxwell’s equations solver. The geometry, dimensions and materials’ parameters for the simulation are chosen to be consistent with the experimental ones.

3. Results and discussion

The negative permeability of the ferrite can be obtained when the FMR takes place. The effective permeability of the ferrite can be expressed by [21

21. H. J. Zhao, J. Zhou, L. Kang, and Q. Zhao, “Tunable two-dimensional left-handed material consisting of ferrite rods and metallic wires,” Opt. Express 17(16), 13373–13380 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]
μeff(ω)=1Fωmp2ω2ωmp2iΓ(ω)ω
(1)
with
Γ(ω)=(ω2ωr+ωm+ωr+ωm)α
(2)
ωmp=ωr(ωr+ωm)
(3)
where α is damping coefficient of ferromagnetic precession, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, F = ωm/ωr, ωm = 4πMsγ is characteristic frequency of the ferrite, Ms is the saturation magnetization. The FMR frequency can be expressed by
ωr=γ[H0+(NxNz)4πMs][H0+(NyNz)4πMs]
(4)
where H0 is the applied magnetic field, Nx, Ny, and Nz are the demagnetization factor for x, y, and z directions, respectively. From Eqs. (1)-(4), it can be predicted that the permeability of the ferrite strongly desponds on the FMR frequency. The FMR frequency ωr is influenced by the demagnetization factor N.

Because of applying the electromagnet in this work, it is difficult to obtain precise measurements of the transmission and reflection by repeatedly assembling the waveguides and matching loads. Thus, instead of experimental data, the simulated scattering parameters are used to retrieve the effective material properties. The material parameters are obtained by S-parameter retrieval method which is described in detail elsewhere [24

24. D. R. Smith, D. C. Vier, Th. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 71(33 Pt 2B), 036617 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The unit cell of a ferrite rod alone with the dimension of 3 × 3 × 10 mm3 is shown in Fig. 2(a)
Fig. 2 (a) Unit cell of a ferrite rod alone; (b) real part of effective permeability retrieved from simulated scattering parameters with a series of rod length l at H0 = 2300 Oe.
. The geometry, dimensions and materials’ parameters used in the simulation are the same as the experimental ones. The retrieved effective permeability μeff of the ferrite rod with a series of length l is shown in Fig. 2(b). The applied magnetic field was set at H0 = 2300 Oe. Firstly, in all cases, there is one remarkable frequency dispersion in the range of 8-12 GHz and the negative Re(μeff) has appeared at the upper resonant frequencies. Secondly, one observes that the FMR frequency decreases as the rod length l increases.

The demagnetization factor N is determined by the dimension of the samples. The demagnetization factor N for one direction varies inversely with the dimension in that direction. On increasing l from 0.8 mm to 2.4 mm, the demagnetization factor Ny for y direction and the value of (NyNz) decrease. Based on Eq. (4), the ωr decreases as the (NyNz) decreases, which leads to the negative Re(μeff) frequency region shifting to the lower frequency.

The unit cell of two ferrite rods is shown in Fig. 4(a)
Fig. 4 (a) Unit cell of two ferrite rods; (b) real part of effective permeability retrieved from simulated scattering parameters with a series of length l of rod B at H0 = 2300 Oe.
. The dimension of the YIG rod A is 0.8 × 0.4 × 10 mm3. The width w and height h of the YIG rod B are the same as that of the YIG rod A, while the length l of the YIG rod B is 0.8, 1.6, and 2.4 mm, respectively. The retrieved effective permeability μeff of two ferrite rods with a series of length l of rod B at H0 = 2300 Oe is shown in Fig. 4(b). The rod-wire-rod unit shows the two negative permeability properties, which is different from the rod-wire unit shown in Fig. 2(b). When the length l of rod B is equivalent to that of rod A (l = 0.8 mm), there is only one frequency dispersion observed due to the same demagnetization factor for rod A and rod B. when l > 0.8 mm, there are two remarkable frequency dispersions in the range of 8-12 GHz. One can see that the first FMR frequency controlled by rod B decreases as the rod B length l increases, while the second FMR frequency controlled by rod A is constant. It is obvious that the two negative permeability frequency regions can be tuned by the dimension of the ferrites.

The dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials were composed of the rod-wire-rod units. Figure 5(a)
Fig. 5 (a) Measured transmission spectra for rods A and rods B, wires-only and the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials with the rod B length l = 2.4 mm at H0 = 2300 Oe; (b) Measured transmission spectra for the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials with a series of rod B length l at H0 = 2300 Oe.
shows the measured transmission spectra for rods A and rods B, wires-only and the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials with the rod B length l = 2.4 mm, respectively. There are two band gaps in the transmission curve for two YIG rods alone, which is induced by the negative permeability around the two FMR frequency regions. Two passbands were observed for the ferrite-based metamaterials consisting of rod-wire-rod units, which is different from the ferrite-based metamaterials consisting of rod-wire units. The measured transmission spectra for the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials with a series of rod B length l were shown in Fig. 5(b). When the length l of rod A and rod B equals 0.8 mm, a passband was observed. When the length l of rod B is different from that of rod A (l > 0.8 mm), there are two passbands observed in the range of 8-12 GHz. The first passband frequency controlled by rod B decreases as the rod B length l increases, while the second passband frequency controlled by rod A is constant. The passband tunable characteristic is in agreement with the behavior of effective permeability, which is influenced by the dimension of the ferrites.

The unit cell of ferrite rod A-copper wire-ferrite rod B is shown in Fig. 6(a)
Fig. 6 (a) Unit cell of ferrite rod A-copper wire-ferrite rod B; (b) retrieved real part of effective refractive index of the rod-wire-rod unit with a series of length l of rod B at H0 = 2300 Oe.
. The dimensions of the ferrite rod A, rod B and copper wire are the same as that described above. The real part of effective refractive index neff is retrieved from the simulated scattering parameters for the rod-wire-rod unit, as shown in Fig. 6(b). It can be seen that the real part of the index Re(neff) is negative in the frequency range where the passband appears, indicating that the dual-band ferrite-based metamaterials should be the NRI metamaterials. When the length l of rod B is different from that of rod A (l > 0.8 mm), there are two negative refractive index frequency region observed in the range of 8-12 GHz and the first negative refractive index frequency decreases as the rod B length l increases, which is in agreement with the behavior of transmission spectra.

Figure 7(a)
Fig. 7 (a) Simulated transmission spectra for the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials and (b) retrieved real part of effective refractive index of the rod-wire-rod unit with rod B length l = 2.4 mm under a series of applied magnetic fields.
shows the simulated transmission spectra for the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials with rod B length l = 2.4 mm under a series of applied magnetic fields. There are two passbands in the simulated transmission curves, which is in agreement with the behavior of the experimental ones. The passbands simulated under different H0 reveals its magnetically tunable property. As H0 rises from 1900 to 2300 Oe, the first passband frequency increases from 9.1 to 10.2 GHz, while the second passband frequency increases from 9.5 to 10.6 GHz. The real part of effective refractive index neff of the rod-wire-rod unit under a series of applied magnetic fields is shown in Fig. 7(b). It can be seen that the two negative refractive index frequencies increase as the H0 increases, which in good agreement with the behavior of transmission spectra.

4. Conclusion

The single-band and dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials consisting of metallic wires and ferrite rods with various dimensions have been prepared. The microwave transmission properties can be tuned not only by changing the applied magnetic field, but also by adjusting the dimensions of the ferrite rods. For the single-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials consisting of rod-wire units, the passband frequency decreases as rod length increases. For the dual-band NRI ferrite-based metamaterials consisting of rod-wire-rod units, there are two passbands observed in the range of 8-12 GHz when the length of rod B is different from that of rod A, and the passband frequencies are also decrease as the rod length increases. The results provide a new way to fabricate the tunable dual-band metamaterials cloaks, antennas and absorbers.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Shandong Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. ZR2010AM025, National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51032003, 11274198, 51102148, and National High Technology Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2012AA030403.

References and links

1.

V. G. Veselago, “The electrodynamics of substance simultaneously negative values of ε and μ,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 10(4), 509–514 (1968). [CrossRef]

2.

J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, W. J. Stewart, and I. Youngs, “Extremely low frequency plasmons in metallic mesostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(25), 4773–4776 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, “Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47(11), 2075–2084 (1999). [CrossRef]

4.

R. A. Shelby, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, “Experimental Verification of a Negative Index of Refraction,” Science 292(5514), 77–79 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

A. Grbic and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Periodic Analysis of a 2-D Negative Refractive Index Transmission Line Structure,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 51(10), 2604–2611 (2003). [CrossRef]

6.

D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, and M. C. Wiltshire, “Metamaterials and Negative Refractive Index,” Science 305(5685), 788–792 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(18), 3966–3969 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

N. Seddon and T. Bearpark, “Observation of the inverse Doppler effect,” Science 302(5650), 1537–1540 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

C. G. Parazzoli, R. B. Greegor, J. A. Nielsen, M. A. Thompson, K. Li, A. M. Vetter, M. H. Tanielian, and D. C. Vier, “Performance of a negative index of refraction lens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(17), 3232–3234 (2004). [CrossRef]

10.

D. R. Smith, W. J. Padilla, D. C. Vier, S. C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, “Composite Medium with Simultaneously Negative Permeability and Permittivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(18), 4184–4187 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

P. Gay-Balmaz and O. J. F. Martin, “Electromagnetic resonances in individual and coupled split-ring resonators,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(5), 2929–2936 (2002). [CrossRef]

12.

H. Chen, L. Ran, J. Huangfu, X. Zhang, K. Chen, T. M. Grzegorczyk, and J. A. Kong, “Negative refraction of a combined double S-shaped metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86(15), 151909 (2005). [CrossRef]

13.

K. Aydin and E. Ozbay, “Identifying magnetic response of split-ring resonators at microwave frequencies,” Opto-Electron. Rev. 14(3), 193–199 (2006). [CrossRef]

14.

X. J. He, Y. Wang, Z. X. Geng, J. M. Wang, and T. L. Gui, “3D broadband isotropic NRI metamaterial based on metallic cross-pairs,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323(20), 2425–2428 (2011). [CrossRef]

15.

S. Kim, H. K. Choi, J. I. Choi, and J. H. Park, “A new approach to the design of a dual-band IFA with a metamaterial unit cell,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 54(2), 545–549 (2012). [CrossRef]

16.

C. Sabah and H. G. Roskos, “Dual-band polarization-independent sub-terahertz fishnet metamaterial,” Curr. Appl. Phys. 12(2), 443–450 (2012). [CrossRef]

17.

Y. Liu, S. Gu, C. Luo, and X. Zhao, “Ultra-thin broadband metamaterial absorber,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 108(1), 19–24 (2012). [CrossRef]

18.

G. Dewar, “Candidates for μ < 0, ε < 0 nanostructures,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15(24n25), 3258–3265 (2001). [CrossRef]

19.

L. Kang, Q. Zhao, H. J. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Ferrite-based magnetically tunable left-handed metamaterial composed of SRRs and wires,” Opt. Express 16(22), 17269–17275 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

H. J. Zhao, J. Zhou, Q. Zhao, B. Li, L. Kang, and Y. Bai, “Magnetotunable left-handed material consisting of yttrium iron garnet slab and metallic wires,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(13), 131107 (2007). [CrossRef]

21.

H. J. Zhao, J. Zhou, L. Kang, and Q. Zhao, “Tunable two-dimensional left-handed material consisting of ferrite rods and metallic wires,” Opt. Express 17(16), 13373–13380 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

P. He, J. Gao, Y. Chen, P. V. Parimi, C. Vittoria, and V. G. Harris, “Q-band tunable negative refractive index metamaterial using Sc-doped BaM hexaferrite,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(15), 155005 (2009). [CrossRef]

23.

F. Xu, Y. Bai, F. Ai, L. Qiao, H. J. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Realization and modulation of negative permeability using an array of hexaferrite rods,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(6), 065416 (2009). [CrossRef]

24.

D. R. Smith, D. C. Vier, Th. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 71(33 Pt 2B), 036617 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25.

C. Tserkezis, N. Papanikolaou, G. Gantzounis, and N. Stefanou, “Understanding artificial optical magnetism of periodic metal-dielectric-metal layered structures,” Phys. Rev. B 78(16), 165114 (2008). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.3820) Materials : Magneto-optical materials
(160.3918) Materials : Metamaterials

ToC Category:
Integrated Optics

History
Original Manuscript: February 26, 2013
Revised Manuscript: April 7, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: April 7, 2013
Published: April 25, 2013

Citation
Ke Bi, Ji Zhou, Hongjie Zhao, Xiaoming Liu, and Chuwen Lan, "Tunable dual-band negative refractive index in ferrite-based metamaterials," Opt. Express 21, 10746-10752 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-9-10746


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. V. G. Veselago, “The electrodynamics of substance simultaneously negative values of ε and μ,” Sov. Phys. Usp.10(4), 509–514 (1968). [CrossRef]
  2. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, W. J. Stewart, and I. Youngs, “Extremely low frequency plasmons in metallic mesostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett.76(25), 4773–4776 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, “Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.47(11), 2075–2084 (1999). [CrossRef]
  4. R. A. Shelby, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, “Experimental Verification of a Negative Index of Refraction,” Science292(5514), 77–79 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. Grbic and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Periodic Analysis of a 2-D Negative Refractive Index Transmission Line Structure,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag.51(10), 2604–2611 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, and M. C. Wiltshire, “Metamaterials and Negative Refractive Index,” Science305(5685), 788–792 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85(18), 3966–3969 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. N. Seddon and T. Bearpark, “Observation of the inverse Doppler effect,” Science302(5650), 1537–1540 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. C. G. Parazzoli, R. B. Greegor, J. A. Nielsen, M. A. Thompson, K. Li, A. M. Vetter, M. H. Tanielian, and D. C. Vier, “Performance of a negative index of refraction lens,” Appl. Phys. Lett.84(17), 3232–3234 (2004). [CrossRef]
  10. D. R. Smith, W. J. Padilla, D. C. Vier, S. C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, “Composite Medium with Simultaneously Negative Permeability and Permittivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84(18), 4184–4187 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. P. Gay-Balmaz and O. J. F. Martin, “Electromagnetic resonances in individual and coupled split-ring resonators,” J. Appl. Phys.92(5), 2929–2936 (2002). [CrossRef]
  12. H. Chen, L. Ran, J. Huangfu, X. Zhang, K. Chen, T. M. Grzegorczyk, and J. A. Kong, “Negative refraction of a combined double S-shaped metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett.86(15), 151909 (2005). [CrossRef]
  13. K. Aydin and E. Ozbay, “Identifying magnetic response of split-ring resonators at microwave frequencies,” Opto-Electron. Rev.14(3), 193–199 (2006). [CrossRef]
  14. X. J. He, Y. Wang, Z. X. Geng, J. M. Wang, and T. L. Gui, “3D broadband isotropic NRI metamaterial based on metallic cross-pairs,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.323(20), 2425–2428 (2011). [CrossRef]
  15. S. Kim, H. K. Choi, J. I. Choi, and J. H. Park, “A new approach to the design of a dual-band IFA with a metamaterial unit cell,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett.54(2), 545–549 (2012). [CrossRef]
  16. C. Sabah and H. G. Roskos, “Dual-band polarization-independent sub-terahertz fishnet metamaterial,” Curr. Appl. Phys.12(2), 443–450 (2012). [CrossRef]
  17. Y. Liu, S. Gu, C. Luo, and X. Zhao, “Ultra-thin broadband metamaterial absorber,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process.108(1), 19–24 (2012). [CrossRef]
  18. G. Dewar, “Candidates for μ < 0, ε < 0 nanostructures,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B15(24n25), 3258–3265 (2001). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Kang, Q. Zhao, H. J. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Ferrite-based magnetically tunable left-handed metamaterial composed of SRRs and wires,” Opt. Express16(22), 17269–17275 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. H. J. Zhao, J. Zhou, Q. Zhao, B. Li, L. Kang, and Y. Bai, “Magnetotunable left-handed material consisting of yttrium iron garnet slab and metallic wires,” Appl. Phys. Lett.91(13), 131107 (2007). [CrossRef]
  21. H. J. Zhao, J. Zhou, L. Kang, and Q. Zhao, “Tunable two-dimensional left-handed material consisting of ferrite rods and metallic wires,” Opt. Express17(16), 13373–13380 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. P. He, J. Gao, Y. Chen, P. V. Parimi, C. Vittoria, and V. G. Harris, “Q-band tunable negative refractive index metamaterial using Sc-doped BaM hexaferrite,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.42(15), 155005 (2009). [CrossRef]
  23. F. Xu, Y. Bai, F. Ai, L. Qiao, H. J. Zhao, and J. Zhou, “Realization and modulation of negative permeability using an array of hexaferrite rods,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.42(6), 065416 (2009). [CrossRef]
  24. D. R. Smith, D. C. Vier, Th. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys.71(33 Pt 2B), 036617 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. C. Tserkezis, N. Papanikolaou, G. Gantzounis, and N. Stefanou, “Understanding artificial optical magnetism of periodic metal-dielectric-metal layered structures,” Phys. Rev. B78(16), 165114 (2008). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited