OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 22, Iss. 2 — Jan. 27, 2014
  • pp: 1394–1401
« Show journal navigation

Microresonator-based comb generation without an external laser source

Adrea R. Johnson, Yoshitomo Okawachi, Michael R. E. Lamont, Jacob S. Levy, Michal Lipson, and Alexander L. Gaeta  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 1394-1401 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.001394


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1019 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We demonstrate a fiber-microresonator dual-cavity architecture with which we generate 880 nm of comb bandwidth without the need for a continuous-wave pump laser. Comb generation with this pumping scheme is greatly simplified as compared to pumping with a single frequency laser, and the generated combs are inherently robust due to the intrinsic feedback mechanism. Temporal and radio frequency (RF) characterization show a regime of steady comb formation that operates with reduced RF amplitude noise. The dual-cavity design is capable of being integrated on-chip and offers the potential of a turn-key broadband multiple wavelength source.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Recent developments demonstrate that parametric four-wave mixing (FWM) in high-Q microresonators is a highly promising and effective approach for optical frequency comb generation [1

1. T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth, and S. A. Diddams, “Microresonator-based optical frequency combs,” Science 332(6029), 555–559 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10

10. T. Herr, K. Hartinger, J. Riemensberger, C. Y. Wang, E. Gavartin, R. Holzwarth, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Universal formation dynamics and noise of Kerr-frequency combs in microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 480–487 (2012). [CrossRef]

], with applications including spectroscopy, optical clocks, arbitrary waveform generation, frequency metrology, and astronomical spectrograph calibration [1

1. T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth, and S. A. Diddams, “Microresonator-based optical frequency combs,” Science 332(6029), 555–559 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,11

11. Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13

13. T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch, L. Pasquini, A. Manescau, S. D’Odorico, M. T. Murphy, Th. Kentischer, W. Schmidt, and Th. Udem, “Laser frequency combs for astronomical observations,” Science 321(5894), 1335–1337 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Frequency comb generation in each of these microresonator platforms requires tuning an external, single-frequency, continuous-wave (cw) laser into a resonance of the microresonator. As the pump power is coupled into the microresonator, thermal effects shift the resonance to higher wavelengths, creating a soft thermal lock between the cavity resonance and the pump laser [14

14. T. Carmon, L. Yang, and K. J. Vahala, “Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,” Opt. Express 12(20), 4742–4750 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. When the intracavity power exceeds the threshold for parametric oscillation, cascaded four-wave mixing and higher-order four-wave mixing processes occur, resulting in comb generation. Fluctuations in the frequency or power of the pump laser can detune the pump out of the cavity resonance, which disrupts comb generation. These limitations can be overcome using a drop-port of the microresonator as shown by Peccianti et al. [15

15. M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, Y. Park, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Demonstration of a stable ultrafast laser based on a nonlinear microcavity,” Nat. Commun 3, 765 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18

18. A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Stable, dual mode, high repetition rate mode-locked laser based on a microring resonator,” Opt. Express 20(24), 27355–27362 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] with a hydex microring imbedded in a fiber cavity pumped with an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA). Through filter-driven four-wave mixing, they demonstrate a high-repetition-rate pulse source with a 60-nm bandwidth and a 200-GHz repetition rate. In this drop-port configuration the microresonator acts as a filter, seeding the EDFA with wavelengths that correspond to resonances of the microresonator, similar to the recent work done by Cholan, et al. [19

19. N. A. Cholan, M. H. Al-Mansoori, A. S. M. Noor, A. Ismail, and M. A. Mahdi, “Multi-wavelength generation by self-seeded four-wave mixing,” Opt. Express 21(5), 6131–6138 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] for realization of a multiple wavelength source.

Here, we explore a dual-cavity architecture where a single bus waveguide (through-port), which forms part of the external fiber cavity, is coupled to the microresonator (Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Experimental setup for comb generation. The system is based on a dual-cavity design consisting of the silicon-nitride microresonator and an external fiber cavity.
). Due to the higher density of photonic states in the microresonator as compared to the fiber cavity, preferential emission occurs at the microresonator modes resulting in lasing and parametric comb generation defined by the microresonator. Our through-port configuration is effectively analogous to microresonator-based comb generation using a cw pump laser. Additionally, since only a single bus waveguide is coupled to the microresonator, the system operates with reduced coupling losses and allows for higher power efficiency.

Through the use of this dual-cavity design, we achieve broadband comb generation spanning more than 880 nm. Key advantages of this scheme are that the system requires only a narrow-band optical amplifier, as opposed to a stabilized single-frequency laser, and that it eliminates the need to pump at and tune to a resonance wavelength which eliminates disruptions to comb generation due to pump frequency fluctuations which can shift the pump out of resonance. Such a scheme could greatly simplify the comb generation process and allow for a fully-integrated chip-scale multiple-wavelength source with an on-chip amplifier [20

20. H. Park, A. W. Fang, O. Cohen, R. Jones, M. J. Paniccia, and J. E. Bowers, “A hybrid AlGaInAs–silicon evanescent amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 19(4), 230–232 (2007). [CrossRef]

,21

21. L. Agazzi, J. D. B. Bradley, M. Dijkstra, F. Ay, G. Roelkens, R. Baets, K. Wörhoff, and M. Pollnau, “Monolithic integration of erbium-doped amplifiers with silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express 18(26), 27703–27711 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

2. Experiment

Our dual-cavity-based scheme for comb generation is shown in Fig. 1. Amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from an EDFA is coupled into a silicon-nitride microresonator. A fiber polarization controller (FPC) allows for adjustment of the polarization of light coupled to the microresonator, which is a critical issue for cw lasing of the external fiber cavity and comb generation. A polarizer is placed at the output to select quasi-TE polarization. The dispersion of the microresonator waveguide is engineered to optimize parametric FWM gain and oscillation for the TE modes. After the microresonator, a 3-dB coupler is used for output coupling, and the remaining light in the external cavity is passed through a fixed bandpass filter and fed back into the EDFA. The bandpass filter allows for control of the spectral region that experiences round-trip EDFA gain.

Our system achieves comb generation through a different mechanism as compared to the filter-driven FWM process utilizing the drop-port of the microresonator [15

15. M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, Y. Park, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Demonstration of a stable ultrafast laser based on a nonlinear microcavity,” Nat. Commun 3, 765 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18

18. A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Stable, dual mode, high repetition rate mode-locked laser based on a microring resonator,” Opt. Express 20(24), 27355–27362 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In the drop-port configuration, the microresonator effectively acts as both the nonlinear element and as a filter which selects the wavelengths that correspond to resonances of the microresonator for amplification in the EDFA. In our system, depending upon the state of the input polarization, lasing of the dual-cavity can be achieved at modes corresponding to the external fiber cavity or at modes of the microresonator. Initially, it may be counterintuitive that the cavity lases at microresonator resonances at which the round-trip cavity losses are higher. However, the mechanism can be understood in terms of the transition probability as dictated by Fermi's Golden Rule [22

22. P. A. M. Dirac, “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 114(767), 243–265 (1927). [CrossRef]

,23

23. C. Y. Jin, M. Y. Swinkels, R. Johne, T. B. Hoang, L. Midolo, P. J. van Veldhoven, and A. Fiore, “All optical control of the spontaneous emission of quantum dots using coupled-cavity quantum electrodynamics,” arXiv:1207.5311.

]. Below the lasing threshold, the probability of the system emitting at either a microresonator mode or a mode of the external fiber cavity is directly proportional to the density of available states at that frequency. The enhancement of the density of states in a cavity is given by the Purcell factor Fp = (3λ3/4π2)(Q/V) where Q is the quality factor and V is the mode volume [24

24. E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).

]. While the loaded Q-factor of the microresonator, when considering the cold-cavity modes, is lower than that of the external cavity by approximately a factor of 100, the mode volume of the microresonator cavity is lower by a factor of 106, in which case the microresonator resonances provide a higher density of states and thus a higher transition probability to the frequencies corresponding to the microresonator resonance. Since the threshold power for lasing contains the same V/Q factor [25

25. V. Sandoghdar, F. Treussart, J. Hare, V. Lefèvre-Seguin, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Very low threshold whispering-gallery-mode microsphere laser,” Phys. Rev. A 54(3), R1777–R1780 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the modes corresponding to the microresonator cavity reach the oscillation threshold before the external fiber cavity. With sufficient power buildup, the microresonator cavity reaches oscillation threshold, at which point, frequency dependent EDFA gain will preferentially amplify the oscillating mode(s) to the point where it can serve as a pump for comb generation. For comb generation, the polarization is adjusted to quasi-TE, as the coupling between the microresonator and the bus waveguide is optimized for the TE mode. When the polarization is adjusted away from quasi-TE, the Q-factor of the microresonator cavity decreases relative to that of the fiber cavity, and lasing occurs in modes corresponding to the external fiber cavity.

We experimentally investigate the lasing behavior at the modes of the microresonator and external fiber cavities using the dual-cavity setup minus the bandpass filter. We pump at low EDFA power such that the system is near the lasing threshold and adjust the polarization to select the lasing wavelength of the system. For quasi-TE polarization, Fig. 3(a)
Fig. 3 Output spectra of the dual-cavity system for a range of power levels in the bus waveguide. (a) Dual-cavity system oscillating at modes of microresonator. (b) Dual-cavity system oscillating at an external fiber cavity mode away from microresonator resonances.
illustrates lasing at modes of the microresonator for a range of power levels coupled into the bus waveguide. Dips in the optical spectrum correspond to TM resonances of the microresonator. Adjusting the polarization away from quasi-TE leads to lasing at modes of the external cavity away from the microresonator resonances [see Fig. 3(b)]. The modulations in the spectra result from the Fabry-Perot effect caused by reflections from the facets of the bus waveguide. Slight dips in the spectrum at 1542.5 nm and 1544.3 nm correspond to losses due to the TE resonances of the microresonator. The lasing wavelength of the dual-cavity system can therefore be selected through the state of the input polarization.

The dependence of the dual-cavity lasing wavelength on the state of the input polarization to the microresonator is further illustrated in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Measured optical spectra as the polarization is adjusted towards quasi-TE (bottom). The system makes transitions from lasing in an external fiber cavity mode, away from a microresonator mode, to lasing and comb generation in a microresonator mode.
which shows how the dual-cavity lasing mode shifts to modes of the microresonator as the polarization is adjusted toward quasi-TE. The system starts away from the quasi-TE polarization state, resulting in lasing at modes of the external fiber cavity away from the microresonator modes (top). Adjustment of the polarization towards TE can lead to an intermediate state where the system is lasing at both an external cavity and microresonator mode. Further optimization of the polarization results in lasing at a microresonator mode. And finally, for quasi-TE polarization, the system achieves lasing at modes of the microresonator and the generation of a frequency comb (bottom).

We apply the dual-cavity design to produce a broad comb spectra using a 230-GHz free spectral range (FSR) microresonator with a waveguide cross section of 725 x 1600 nm to provide a broad region of anomalous dispersion which yields a comb spectrum spanning 880 nm (90 THz) with over 390 comb lines when pumped with 2.17 W of EDFA power [Fig. 5(a)
Fig. 5 Parametric frequency comb spectra generated from silicon-nitride microresonators with FSR’s of (a) 230-GHz and (b) 80-GHz.
]. For a microresonator with an 80-GHz FSR and 725 x 1700 nm cross section a bandwidth of 730 nm (78 THz) [Fig. 5(b)] is achieved with 2 W of EDFA power.

We confirm that comb generation in this system is similar to that using an external cw pump laser by utilizing a 1.1-nm bandpass filter whose bandwidth is narrower than the FSR of the microresonator. This restricts the amplifier bandwidth to a narrow region surrounding a single microresonator resonance. Figure 6
Fig. 6 Dual-cavity-based comb generation with a 1.1 nm bandpass filter centered at (a) 1544 nm and, (b) 1558.7 nm.
shows broadband comb generation for the bandpass filter centered at 1544 and 1558.7 nm. In both cases the single lasing peak is responsible for the generation of the comb.

In order to understand the spectral properties of our dual-comb system, we perform simultaneous RF and optical spectral measurements of the dual-cavity output. We utilize the dual-cavity configuration with the bandpass filter removed from the external fiber cavity. By adjusting the polarization, we allow the external fiber cavity to lase without interaction with the resonator [see Fig. 8(a)
Fig. 8 Optical output spectra without (a) and with (b) coupling to the microresonator and (c) and (d) are the corresponding RF spectra, respectively. The insets in (c) and (d) show the RF noise from DC to 2 GHz.
]. The output from the bus waveguide is detected with a 12.5-GHz photodiode, and the resulting RF signal is amplified with a 0.1-500-MHz low-noise amplifier and measured using an RF spectrum analyzer. The detected RF beatnote is 5 MHz [Fig. 8(c)], which corresponds to beating of the external cavity modes since the 1-GHz linewidth of the microresonator mode supports multiple modes of the external cavity. The inset in Fig. 8(c) further illustrates this multi-mode behavior as the RF noise is present out to 2 GHz. Next, the polarization in the bus waveguide is rotated to quasi-TE for comb generation and the entire comb output is sent to the photodiode and RF amplifier for characterization. The measured optical power at the photodiode is equal to that for the case of lasing in the fiber cavity. When a state of steady comb generation is reached [Fig. 8(b)], despite the multi-mode pump, a steady state of comb generation can be reached in which the RF amplitude of the 5 MHz beatnote is reduced by 20 dB, and the beatnote linewidth broadens significantly [Fig. 8(d)]. In addition, Fig. 8(d) inset shows 220 MHz (3-dB bandwidth) of RF noise during comb generation, indicating that the number of oscillating external cavity modes is greatly reduced when comb generation occurs. We believe the system can be further improved to allow for single-mode operation by reducing the external cavity length. Additionally, we expect that complete stabilization of the comb can be achieved through FSR control of both the microresonator and external fiber cavity. Microresonator FSR stabilization can be implemented through pump power or temperature control, while stabilization of the external fiber cavity FSR can be performed using a piezo-based delay arm.

Finally, we perform measurements to determine the parametric oscillation threshold of the dual-cavity system. Figure 9
Fig. 9 Optical spectra for EDFA pump powers ranging from 15 to 103 mW. Parametric oscillation is obtained for an EDFA pump power of 20 mW (third row).
shows the optical spectra obtained for a range of EDFA pump powers. Taking into account a 6-dB coupling loss per facet, we obtain a frequency comb with 30 nm of bandwidth with 26 mW in the bus waveguide (top). Decreasing the EDFA pump power decreases the comb bandwidth until the threshold for parametric oscillation is reached (third row). Parametric oscillation occurs for an EDFA pump power of 20 mW, corresponding to 5 mW in the bus waveguide. The low oscillation threshold of the dual-cavity system and the robust nature of the comb generation suggest a promising platform that can be integrated to create a compact, turn-key multiple wavelength source.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a dual-cavity design to produce broadband parametric frequency comb generation spanning 90 THz without the need of an external pump laser. As a result of the higher photonic density of states of the microresonator as compared to that of the fiber cavity, the system lases at a microresonator resonance which eliminates the need to carefully tune a cw laser into a cavity resonance and results in comb generation that is inherently robust. Future designs could allow for the inclusion of an on-chip amplifier into the dual-cavity design to realize a fully-integrated, chip-scale, ultra-broadband multiple wavelength source.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) via the QuASAR program, the Air-Force Office of Scientific Research under grant FA9550-12-1-0377 and Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC). This work was performed in part at the Cornell Nano-Scale Facility, a member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (grant ECS-0335765). We also acknowledge useful discussions with I. H. Agha, K. Saha, R. Salem, and Y. H. Wen. A. R. J. and Y.O. contributed equally to this work.

References and links

1.

T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth, and S. A. Diddams, “Microresonator-based optical frequency combs,” Science 332(6029), 555–559 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator,” Nature 450(7173), 1214–1217 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, I. Solomatine, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, “Tunable optical frequency comb with a crystalline whispering gallery mode resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(9), 093902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

M. A. Foster, J. S. Levy, O. Kuzucu, K. Saha, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “A silicon-based monolithic optical frequency comb source,” arXiv:1102.0326.

5.

Y. Okawachi, K. Saha, J. S. Levy, Y. H. Wen, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Octave-spanning frequency comb generation in a silicon nitride chip,” Opt. Lett. 36(17), 3398–3400 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

W. Liang, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, “Generation of near-infrared frequency combs from a MgF₂ whispering gallery mode resonator,” Opt. Lett. 36(12), 2290–2292 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

S. B. Papp and S. A. Diddams, “Spectral and temporal characterization of a fused-quartz-microresonator optical frequency comb,” Phys. Rev. A 84(5), 053833 (2011). [CrossRef]

8.

K. Saha, Y. Okawachi, B. Shim, J. S. Levy, R. Salem, A. R. Johnson, M. A. Foster, M. R. Lamont, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Modelocking and femtosecond pulse generation in chip-based frequency combs,” Opt. Express 21(1), 1335–1343 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

F. Ferdous, H. Miao, D. E. Leaird, K. Srinivasan, J. Wang, L. Chen, L. T. Varghese, and A. M. Weiner, “Spectral line-by-line pulse shaping of an on-chip microresonator frequency comb,” Nat. Photonics 5(12), 770–776 (2011). [CrossRef]

10.

T. Herr, K. Hartinger, J. Riemensberger, C. Y. Wang, E. Gavartin, R. Holzwarth, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Universal formation dynamics and noise of Kerr-frequency combs in microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 480–487 (2012). [CrossRef]

11.

Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

Z. Jiang, D. E. Leaird, and A. M. Weiner, “Line-by-line pulse shaping control for optical arbitrary waveform generation,” Opt. Express 13(25), 10431–10439 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch, L. Pasquini, A. Manescau, S. D’Odorico, M. T. Murphy, Th. Kentischer, W. Schmidt, and Th. Udem, “Laser frequency combs for astronomical observations,” Science 321(5894), 1335–1337 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

T. Carmon, L. Yang, and K. J. Vahala, “Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,” Opt. Express 12(20), 4742–4750 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, Y. Park, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Demonstration of a stable ultrafast laser based on a nonlinear microcavity,” Nat. Commun 3, 765 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

L. Caspani, M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, M. Clerici, L. Razzari, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Self-locked low threshold OPO in a CMOS-compatible microring resonator,” CM2M.2, CLEO: Science and Innovations (2012).

17.

A. Pasquazi, L. Caspani, M. Peccianti, M. Clerici, M. Ferrera, L. Razzari, D. Duchesne, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Self-locked optical parametric oscillation in a CMOS compatible microring resonator: a route to robust optical frequency comb generation on a chip,” Opt. Express 21(11), 13333–13341 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Stable, dual mode, high repetition rate mode-locked laser based on a microring resonator,” Opt. Express 20(24), 27355–27362 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

N. A. Cholan, M. H. Al-Mansoori, A. S. M. Noor, A. Ismail, and M. A. Mahdi, “Multi-wavelength generation by self-seeded four-wave mixing,” Opt. Express 21(5), 6131–6138 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

H. Park, A. W. Fang, O. Cohen, R. Jones, M. J. Paniccia, and J. E. Bowers, “A hybrid AlGaInAs–silicon evanescent amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 19(4), 230–232 (2007). [CrossRef]

21.

L. Agazzi, J. D. B. Bradley, M. Dijkstra, F. Ay, G. Roelkens, R. Baets, K. Wörhoff, and M. Pollnau, “Monolithic integration of erbium-doped amplifiers with silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express 18(26), 27703–27711 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

P. A. M. Dirac, “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 114(767), 243–265 (1927). [CrossRef]

23.

C. Y. Jin, M. Y. Swinkels, R. Johne, T. B. Hoang, L. Midolo, P. J. van Veldhoven, and A. Fiore, “All optical control of the spontaneous emission of quantum dots using coupled-cavity quantum electrodynamics,” arXiv:1207.5311.

24.

E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).

25.

V. Sandoghdar, F. Treussart, J. Hare, V. Lefèvre-Seguin, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Very low threshold whispering-gallery-mode microsphere laser,” Phys. Rev. A 54(3), R1777–R1780 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26.

D. D. Smith, H. Chang, and K. A. Fuller, “Whispering-gallery mode splitting in coupled microresonators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20(9), 1967–1974 (2003). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(190.4380) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, four-wave mixing
(190.4390) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, integrated optics

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: November 14, 2013
Revised Manuscript: January 3, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: January 4, 2014
Published: January 14, 2014

Citation
Adrea R. Johnson, Yoshitomo Okawachi, Michael R. E. Lamont, Jacob S. Levy, Michal Lipson, and Alexander L. Gaeta, "Microresonator-based comb generation without an external laser source," Opt. Express 22, 1394-1401 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-22-2-1394


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth, S. A. Diddams, “Microresonator-based optical frequency combs,” Science 332(6029), 555–559 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, T. J. Kippenberg, “Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator,” Nature 450(7173), 1214–1217 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, I. Solomatine, D. Seidel, L. Maleki, “Tunable optical frequency comb with a crystalline whispering gallery mode resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(9), 093902 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. M. A. Foster, J. S. Levy, O. Kuzucu, K. Saha, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “A silicon-based monolithic optical frequency comb source,” arXiv:1102.0326.
  5. Y. Okawachi, K. Saha, J. S. Levy, Y. H. Wen, M. Lipson, A. L. Gaeta, “Octave-spanning frequency comb generation in a silicon nitride chip,” Opt. Lett. 36(17), 3398–3400 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. W. Liang, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, V. S. Ilchenko, D. Seidel, L. Maleki, “Generation of near-infrared frequency combs from a MgF₂ whispering gallery mode resonator,” Opt. Lett. 36(12), 2290–2292 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. S. B. Papp, S. A. Diddams, “Spectral and temporal characterization of a fused-quartz-microresonator optical frequency comb,” Phys. Rev. A 84(5), 053833 (2011). [CrossRef]
  8. K. Saha, Y. Okawachi, B. Shim, J. S. Levy, R. Salem, A. R. Johnson, M. A. Foster, M. R. Lamont, M. Lipson, A. L. Gaeta, “Modelocking and femtosecond pulse generation in chip-based frequency combs,” Opt. Express 21(1), 1335–1343 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. F. Ferdous, H. Miao, D. E. Leaird, K. Srinivasan, J. Wang, L. Chen, L. T. Varghese, A. M. Weiner, “Spectral line-by-line pulse shaping of an on-chip microresonator frequency comb,” Nat. Photonics 5(12), 770–776 (2011). [CrossRef]
  10. T. Herr, K. Hartinger, J. Riemensberger, C. Y. Wang, E. Gavartin, R. Holzwarth, M. L. Gorodetsky, T. J. Kippenberg, “Universal formation dynamics and noise of Kerr-frequency combs in microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 480–487 (2012). [CrossRef]
  11. Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416(6877), 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Z. Jiang, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, “Line-by-line pulse shaping control for optical arbitrary waveform generation,” Opt. Express 13(25), 10431–10439 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch, L. Pasquini, A. Manescau, S. D’Odorico, M. T. Murphy, Th. Kentischer, W. Schmidt, Th. Udem, “Laser frequency combs for astronomical observations,” Science 321(5894), 1335–1337 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. T. Carmon, L. Yang, K. J. Vahala, “Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,” Opt. Express 12(20), 4742–4750 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, Y. Park, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, R. Morandotti, “Demonstration of a stable ultrafast laser based on a nonlinear microcavity,” Nat. Commun 3, 765 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. L. Caspani, M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, M. Clerici, L. Razzari, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, and R. Morandotti, “Self-locked low threshold OPO in a CMOS-compatible microring resonator,” CM2M.2, CLEO: Science and Innovations (2012).
  17. A. Pasquazi, L. Caspani, M. Peccianti, M. Clerici, M. Ferrera, L. Razzari, D. Duchesne, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, R. Morandotti, “Self-locked optical parametric oscillation in a CMOS compatible microring resonator: a route to robust optical frequency comb generation on a chip,” Opt. Express 21(11), 13333–13341 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, D. J. Moss, R. Morandotti, “Stable, dual mode, high repetition rate mode-locked laser based on a microring resonator,” Opt. Express 20(24), 27355–27362 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. N. A. Cholan, M. H. Al-Mansoori, A. S. M. Noor, A. Ismail, M. A. Mahdi, “Multi-wavelength generation by self-seeded four-wave mixing,” Opt. Express 21(5), 6131–6138 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. H. Park, A. W. Fang, O. Cohen, R. Jones, M. J. Paniccia, J. E. Bowers, “A hybrid AlGaInAs–silicon evanescent amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 19(4), 230–232 (2007). [CrossRef]
  21. L. Agazzi, J. D. B. Bradley, M. Dijkstra, F. Ay, G. Roelkens, R. Baets, K. Wörhoff, M. Pollnau, “Monolithic integration of erbium-doped amplifiers with silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express 18(26), 27703–27711 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. P. A. M. Dirac, “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 114(767), 243–265 (1927). [CrossRef]
  23. C. Y. Jin, M. Y. Swinkels, R. Johne, T. B. Hoang, L. Midolo, P. J. van Veldhoven, and A. Fiore, “All optical control of the spontaneous emission of quantum dots using coupled-cavity quantum electrodynamics,” arXiv:1207.5311.
  24. E. M. Purcell, “Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies,” Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946).
  25. V. Sandoghdar, F. Treussart, J. Hare, V. Lefèvre-Seguin, J.-M. Raimond, S. Haroche, “Very low threshold whispering-gallery-mode microsphere laser,” Phys. Rev. A 54(3), R1777–R1780 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. D. D. Smith, H. Chang, K. A. Fuller, “Whispering-gallery mode splitting in coupled microresonators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20(9), 1967–1974 (2003). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited