OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: J. H. Eberly
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 10 — May. 10, 1999
  • pp: 388–399
« Show journal navigation

Three-dimensional field structure in open unstable resonators Part I: Passive cavity results

Kurt E. Oughstun and Chris C. Khamnei  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 4, Issue 10, pp. 388-399 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.4.000388


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (195 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The three-dimensional field distribution of the diffractive cavity mode structure in a passive, open, unstable resonator is presented as a function of the equivalent Fresnel number of the cavity. The qualitative structure of this intracavity field distribution, including the central intensity core (or oscillator filament), is characterized in terms of the Fresnel zone structure that is defined over the cavity feedback aperture. Previous related research is reviewed.

© Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The essential optical parameters for describing the transverse mode structure properties of an open, unstable cavity with a single, sharp-edge feedback aperture are the cavity magnification M and equivalent Fresnel number Neq . These properties are embodied in the appropriate diffractive transverse mode eigenvalue equation [1–3

1. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, 1986) Chapters 21–23.

]; for a cylindrical cavity, each azimuthal component radial mode satisfies the integral equation

γ˜nlunl(r)=2πei(l+1)π/2NcM01unl(r0)Jl(2πNcrr0/M)exp[Nc(r02+r2/M2)]r0dr0,
(1)

where l = 0,±1,±2,… is the azimuthal mode index and n = 1,2,3,… is the radial mode index for the total cavity mode field u(r, ϕ) = Σn=1 Σl= unl (r) exp (ilϕ). The radial mode indices are chosen such that γnlγ n+1,l, where γnl = |γ̃nl | denotes the magnitude of the complex eigenvalue of the mode. The integration domain in Eq. (1) extends over the normalized transverse radial extent of the cavity feedback aperture. Here

Nc=Ma2
(2)

is the collimated Fresnel number of the cavity [1

1. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, 1986) Chapters 21–23.

], where 2a is the feedback aperture dimension, B is the equivalent collimated cavity length, and λ is the wavelength of the cavity wave field.

The cavity magnification M determines the geometric optical properties of the transverse mode structure, as described by the geometrical mode equation of Siegman and Arrathoon [2

2. A. E. Siegman and R. Arrathoon, “Modes in unstable optical resonators and lens waveguides,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-3, 156–163 (1967). [CrossRef]

]

γ˜nl(G)unl(G)(r)=flMunl(G)(r/M);r<M
(3)

for a cylindrical, circular aperture cavity, where fl = 1 for a positive branch (M > 1) cavity, while fl = (-1)l+1 for a negative branch (M < -1) cavity. This relation expresses the conservation of energy in a single geometrical magnification of the cavity field and follows from the asymptotic behavior of the integral equation (1) in the limit as the collimated Fresnel number Nc approaches infinity. Superimposed on this geometrical optics contribution is the diffractive edge-scattered wave from the cavity feedback aperture whose first-order contribution modifies the geometric mode equation (3) into the form [3

3. K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

]

γ˜nl(1)unl(1)=flMunl(1)(r/M)
eiπlπ(MNcr)1/2unl(1)(1)1(r/M)2exp[Nc(1+(r/M)2)]
·{cos(2πNcr/Mlπ/2π/4)irMsin(2πNcr/Mlπ/2π/4)}
(4)

for 0 < r < |M| asymptotically as Nc → ∞. The transverse mode structure for a large Fresnel number cavity is then seen to be dominated by the geometric optics mode solution plus the secondary edge diffracted wave that is a characteristic of the cavity magnification and collimated Fresnel number.

In the opposite extreme as the collimated Fresnel number Nc becomes small and approaches zero in the limit, the transverse mode equation (1) may be approximated as

γ˜nlunl(r)2πei(l+1)π2NcMexp(Ncr2M2)01unl(r0)Jl(2πNcMrr0)r0dr0,
(5)

which is proportional to the Hankel transform of the feedback aperture field. The transverse mode structure in a small Fresnel number unstable cavity is then dominated by the edge diffracted wave.

The collimated Fresnel number Nc of the unstable cavity represents the number of Fresnel half-period zones for a plane wave field filling the magnified feedback aperture when viewed from the center of that aperture at a distance of one equivalent collimated cavity length away [3

3. K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

] and describes the diffractive phenomena that occurs in a single round-trip propagation through the cavity. As such, it is the parameter upon which the sampling criteria for the numerical evaluation of the transverse mode structure are based [3

3. K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

, 4

4. E. A. Sziklas and A. E. Siegman, “Diffraction calculations using fast Fourier transform methods,” IEEE Proc. 62, 410–412 (1974). [CrossRef]

]. However, it does not describe the Fresnel zone structure of the cavity mode field distribution at the feedback aperture, as this is the result of repeated round-trip iterations through the optical cavity. That parameter must be defined in terms of the number of Fresnel half-period zones that are present in the geometrical optics mode phase front incident upon the feedback aperture plane as viewed from the center of the feedback aperture plane one iteration removed. As a consequence, the equivalent Fresnel number Neq of an unstable cavity is defined such that the quantity Neqλ is equal to the sagittal distance between the expanding geometrical optics mode phase front and the corresponding converging wave front at the edge of the cavity feedback aperture [5

5. Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Unstable resonators and their applications (Review),” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565–586 (1972). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. Yu. A. Anan’ev, Laser Resonators and the Beam Divergence Problem (Adam Hilger, 1992).

]. With this definition the general expression [1

1. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, 1986) Chapters 21–23.

]

Neq=M212M2Nc
(6)

is obtained within the paraxial approximation.

2. Fresnel Zone Structure of an Open Unstable Cavity

The diffractive mode properties of an unstable open cavity may be understood through a consideration of the edge diffraction effects introduced by the cavity feedback aperture [5

5. Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Unstable resonators and their applications (Review),” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565–586 (1972). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. Yu. A. Anan’ev, Laser Resonators and the Beam Divergence Problem (Adam Hilger, 1992).

]. Diffraction at the cavity feedback aperture produces both a reflected feedback field and an edge scattered field whose virtual source is located at the edge of the feedback aperture, as described in Eq. (4). A portion of this edge-scattered field gives rise to a converging, demagnifying wave field which is nearly completely retained within the cavity, even after several round-trip propagations through the cavity, and only begins to diverge when the fundamental physical process of diffraction begins to dominate its geometric demagnification. By comparison, the flux of the magnifying geometrical mode field decreases by the factor Ln = 1- |γn(G)|2 after each round-trip propagation through the cavity, while the field scattered along other directions rapidly escapes from the unstable cavity. As a consequence, the intensity of the converging wave, which is negligible near the edge of the cavity feedback aperture, is geometrically amplified as it propagates inward toward the cavity optical axis to such an extent that it has a significant influence on the entire structure of the cavity field [5

5. Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Unstable resonators and their applications (Review),” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565–586 (1972). [CrossRef]

]. It is precisely this mechanism of diffractive feedback, along with its coherent interaction with the magnifying cavity field that determines the diffractive mode properties of an unstable optical cavity. The coherent radiation in the diverging cavity field that is incident upon the edge of the feedback aperture and is then scattered into the converging wave travels the distance Neqλ between these two wavefronts. As a consequence, when the equivalent Fresnel number of the cavity is changed by unity, the phase shift between the diverging and converging waves changes by 2π and the coherent interaction between those two wave fields is essentially unchanged [5

5. Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Unstable resonators and their applications (Review),” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565–586 (1972). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. Yu. A. Anan’ev, Laser Resonators and the Beam Divergence Problem (Adam Hilger, 1992).

]. The diffractive properties of an unstable resonator with a sharply defined feedback aperture are then quasiperiodic with respect to the equivalent Fresnel number of the cavity.

The diffractive structure of the cavity mode field may be explained in terms of the Fresnel zone structure that is defined over the feedback aperture [3

3. K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

, 7

7. W. H. Steier and G. L. McAllister, “A simplified method for predicting unstable resonator mode profiles,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-11, 725–728 (1975). [CrossRef]

, 8

8. K. E. Oughstun, “Passive cavity transverse mode stability and its influence on the active cavity mode properties for unstable optical resonators,” in Optical Resonators, SPIE Proceedingsvol. 1224, D. A. Holmes, ed. (SPIE, 1990) pp. 80–98. [CrossRef]

]. For a cylindrically symmetric cavity, the sagittal distance between the magnifying and demagnifying geometrical mode phase fronts at the circular feedback aperture is, in the paraxial approximation, given by [3

3. K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

]

Δ(r)12(1r+1r)r2
(7)

Δ(r)M212MBr2.
(8)

A radially dependent equivalent Fresnel number function may then be defined at the cavity feedback aperture as [8

8. K. E. Oughstun, “Passive cavity transverse mode stability and its influence on the active cavity mode properties for unstable optical resonators,” in Optical Resonators, SPIE Proceedingsvol. 1224, D. A. Holmes, ed. (SPIE, 1990) pp. 80–98. [CrossRef]

]

Neq(r)Δ(r)λNeqr2a2
(9)

for ra. At the feedback mirror edge (r = a) this function is equal to the equivalent Fresnel number of the cavity. The associated cavity Fresnel zones over the circular feedback aperture are then defined by the set of concentric circles whose radii rna satisfy the condition

Neq(rn)=n+fNeqn=0,1,2,3,,
(10)

where 0 ≤ f < 1 such that the fractional number f is set by the numerical value of Neq . The radii of the cavity Fresnel zones at the feedback aperture are then given by

rn=a(n+fNeq)12,n=0,1,2,3,,
(11)

The importance of the central Fresnel zone lies in the observation that it is from this central core region of the resonator that the cavity field propagates out from and constructs the remainder of the cavity field [5–7

5. Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Unstable resonators and their applications (Review),” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565–586 (1972). [CrossRef]

]. The resulting edge-diffracted wave component from the feedback aperture edge that gives rise to the converging wave propagating back into the cavity provides the feedback to the central core region and accounts for the Fresnel number dependence of the cavity mode structure.

3. Three-Dimensional Field Structure in a Positive Branch Half-Symmetric Unstable Cavity

The Fresnel zone structure and associated central intensity core of an unstable resonator is best illustrated through a detailed consideration of the three-dimensional field structure of the dominant cavity mode. For this purpose, a positive branch half-symmetric unstable cavity geometry, illustrated in Fig. 1, was chosen. The cavity magnification was set at M = 2 and the intracavity field structure was numerically determined as a function of the equivalent Fresnel number of the cavity. The diffractive field calculations are based on the angular spectrum of plane waves representation utilizing the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) as described, along with the associated sampling criteria, in Ref. 3

3. K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

. Once the dominant, azimuthally symmetric (l = 0) mode field structure incident upon the cavity feedback mirror was obtained in a Fox and Li type iteration procedure, the three dimensional intracavity field distribution was obtained by calculating the diffractive feedback field at 80 transverse planes evenly spaced through the unfolded cavity [11

11. C. C. Khamnei, Open Unstable Optical Resonator Mode Field Theory (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vermont, 1998).

].

Fig. 1. Half-symmetric, positive branch unstable cavity geometry with magnification M.

The same behavior is obtained for larger equivalent Fresnel number cavities [11

11. C. C. Khamnei, Open Unstable Optical Resonator Mode Field Theory (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vermont, 1998).

], as illustrated in Figs. 8–11. At the integer equivalent Fresnel number Neq = 6.0, the central intensity core is weakly defined, as seen in Fig. 8, has improved definition at Neq = 6.25 , as seen in Fig. 9, achieves a local optimum at Neq = 6.5 , as seen in Fig. 10, and decreases in definition at N = 6.75, as seen in Fig. 11.

The numerical results presented in Figs. 2–11 clearly illustrate the Fresnel zone structure of the passive cavity mode field distribution and the interrelationship between the central intensity core and the transverse mode discrimination ratio. A notable characteristic of each of these three-dimensional passive cavity mode field distributions is that each represents the decaying cavity field, the peak in the intensity structure appearing in the feedback field, the relative intensity decreasing as the field propagates away from the feedback mirror because of the cavity magnification. The opposite occurs for a laser with an unstable cavity since the gain medium compensates for both the geometric magnification and the resultant outcoupling loss from the cavity.

Fig. 1. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 0.5 .
Fig. 2. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 0.75.
Fig. 3. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 1.0.
Fig. 4. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 1.25.
Fig. 5. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq =1.5.
Fig. 6. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 1.75.
Fig. 7. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 6.0
Fig. 8. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 6.25.
Fig. 9. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 6.5.
Fig. 10. Passive three-dimensional intracavity field distribution in an M = 2 half-symmetric unstable cavity with Neq = 6.75.

4. Discussion

These results clearly show the importance of the Fresnel zone structure on the intracavity mode structure properties of an unstable resonator in the passive (purely optical) cavity case. Anan′ev′s analogy [9

9. Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Angular divergence of radiation of solid-state lasers,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 197–215 (1971). [CrossRef]

] that a laser with an unstable cavity corresponds to an optical system comprised of a driving generator and an amplifier with a matching telescope between them has been verified through these calculations for the passive (i.e. zero gain) case. The role of the generator is played by the central intensity core that is defined by the central Fresnel zone of the cavity and the role of the amplifier by the remaining peripheral zone of the cavity, with the edge-diffracted field at the feedback aperture edge providing the controlling feedback to the central intensity core. It is this mechanism of diffractive feedback into a converging wave field and its interaction with the magnifying or diverging cavity field that produces the central intensity core and determines the diffractive properties of the cavity mode structure.

Acknowledgments

The research presented here has been supported, in part, by the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant # F49620-97-1-0300, and by the Graduate College of the University of Vermont.

References and Links

1.

A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, 1986) Chapters 21–23.

2.

A. E. Siegman and R. Arrathoon, “Modes in unstable optical resonators and lens waveguides,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-3, 156–163 (1967). [CrossRef]

3.

K. E. Oughstun, “Unstable resonator modes,” in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165–387. [CrossRef]

4.

E. A. Sziklas and A. E. Siegman, “Diffraction calculations using fast Fourier transform methods,” IEEE Proc. 62, 410–412 (1974). [CrossRef]

5.

Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Unstable resonators and their applications (Review),” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565–586 (1972). [CrossRef]

6.

Yu. A. Anan’ev, Laser Resonators and the Beam Divergence Problem (Adam Hilger, 1992).

7.

W. H. Steier and G. L. McAllister, “A simplified method for predicting unstable resonator mode profiles,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-11, 725–728 (1975). [CrossRef]

8.

K. E. Oughstun, “Passive cavity transverse mode stability and its influence on the active cavity mode properties for unstable optical resonators,” in Optical Resonators, SPIE Proceedingsvol. 1224, D. A. Holmes, ed. (SPIE, 1990) pp. 80–98. [CrossRef]

9.

Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Angular divergence of radiation of solid-state lasers,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 197–215 (1971). [CrossRef]

10.

Yu. A. Anan’ev, “Establishment of oscillations in unstable resonators,” Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 5, 615–617 (1975). [CrossRef]

11.

C. C. Khamnei, Open Unstable Optical Resonator Mode Field Theory (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vermont, 1998).

OCIS Codes
(140.3410) Lasers and laser optics : Laser resonators
(140.4780) Lasers and laser optics : Optical resonators

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: March 5, 1999
Published: May 10, 1999

Citation
Kurt Oughstun and Chris Khamnei, "Three-dimensional field structure in open unstable resonators Part I: Passive cavity results," Opt. Express 4, 388-399 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-4-10-388


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, 1986) Chapters 21-23.
  2. A. E. Siegman and R. Arrathoon, "Modes in unstable optical resonators and lens waveguides," IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-3, 156-163 (1967). [CrossRef]
  3. K. E. Oughstun, "Unstable resonator modes," in Progress in Optics, vol. xxiv, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, 1987) pp. 165-387. [CrossRef]
  4. E. A. Sziklas and A. E. Siegman, "Diffraction calculations using fast Fourier transform methods," IEEE Proc. 62, 410-412 (1974). [CrossRef]
  5. Yu A. Ananev, "Unstable resonators and their applications (Review)," Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 1, 565-586 (1972). [CrossRef]
  6. Yu. A. Ananev, Laser Resonators and the Beam Divergence Problem (Adam Hilger, 1992).
  7. W. H. Steier and G. L. McAllister, "A simplified method for predicting unstable resonator mode profiles," IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-11, 725-728 (1975). [CrossRef]
  8. K. E. Oughstun, "Passive cavity transverse mode stability and its influence on the active cavity mode properties for unstable optical resonators," in Optical Resonators, SPIE Proceedings vol. 1224, D. A. Holmes, ed. (SPIE, 1990) pp. 80-98. [CrossRef]
  9. Yu. A. Ananev, "Angular divergence of radiation of solid-state lasers," Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 197-215 (1971). [CrossRef]
  10. Yu. A. Ananev, "Establishment of oscillations in unstable resonators," Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 5, 615-617 (1975). [CrossRef]
  11. C. C. Khamnei, Open Unstable Optical Resonator Mode Field Theory (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vermont, 1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited