OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: J. H. Eberly
  • Vol. 6, Iss. 1 — Jan. 3, 2000
  • pp: 2–6
« Show journal navigation

On the use of dual frequency nematic material for adaptive optics systems: first results of a closed -loop experiment.

Sergio R. Restaino, David Dayton, Steve Browne, John Gonglewski, Jeff Baker, Sam Rogers, Scott McDermott, Joe Gallegos, and Mike Shilko  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 2-6 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.6.000002


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (125 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The use of liquid crystal devices for wavefront control has been suggested and implemented by several authors. In this paper we report some preliminary results on the use of Nematic based liquid crystal devices. Several experimental efforts have been carried out in the past few months. One of the main aims was to characterize a new device that uses dual frequency nematic material in a closed loop arrangement.

© Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

In the past few years several groups have been actively engaged in demonstrating the use of liquid crystal (LC) devices for wavefront shaping and control. The focal points of these groups are in USA [1

1. S.R. Restainoet al.., “Use of electro-optical devices for path-length compensation”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 2200,46–48 (1994)

7

7. R.S. Dou and M.K. Giles, “Closed loop adaptive optics system with a liquid-crystal television as a phase retarder”, Opt. Lett. 20, 1583–1585 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], Europe [8

8. T.L. Kelly and G.D. Love, “White light performance of a polarization-independent liquid crystal phase modulator”, App. Opt. 38, 1986–1989 (1999) [CrossRef]

12

12. V.A. Dorezyuk, A.F. Naumov, and V.I. Shmalgauzen, “Control of liquid crystal correctors in adaptive optical systems”, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 34, 1384 (1989)

], and Japan [13

13. W. Klauset al., “Adaptive LC lens array and its applications”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 3635, 66–73 (1999)

]. The reasons behind the use of LC for wavefront control are several. First of all is cost: the main technological push is based on the display industry, which has invested a large amount of money in developing materials, techniques and hardware that can be modified and adapted to be used for wavefront control applications. Other reasons include the low power consumption, low weight, compactness of the devices, and the fact that these are non mechanical devices with very high lifetime.

However, there are also some drawbacks. In using nematic materials the main problems are: polarization dependence and low temporal bandwidth. The first problem was solved by our group through the Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) program in conjunction with Meadowlark Optics [14

14. SR Restainoet al., “Progress report on the USAF Research Laboratory liquid crystal AO program”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. , 3353, 776–781 (1998)

]. The second problem is now well under way of solution by using dual frequency material. This solution is, once again, based on an SBIR with Meadowlark Optics.

In an adaptive optics system one is adjusting the optical path (OP) of the incoming wavefront. Such adjustment can be done in two ways, if using a deformable mirror or liquid crystal device, since the OP is the product of two quantities

OP=Δz·n.
[1]

Where Δz is the geometrical path and n is the refractive index of the medium. A conventional deformable mirror (DM) will modulate Δz, while a liquid crystal device will modulate n. Since nematic materials are birefringent the modulation of the refractive index happens only for one of the polarization states. One way to obviate this problem is to manufacture a device with two orthogonal layers of the the same LC material3.

The phase modulation that can be induced by an LC cell is given by

Δϕ=2πλd2d2[n(z)n]dz+ΔΦ.
[2]

Here n is the extraordinary component of the refractive index, d is the thickness of the cell and <ΔΦ> is the phase component due to thermal fluctuations etc… This last term is usually negligible, for room temperature and standard thickness, for the material used in this experiment, this term is usually of the order of 10-7 radians. Detailed derivation of the expression for <ΔΦ> can be found in Ref. [15

15. G. Labrunie and J. Robert, “Fluctuation and scattering of light in nematic liquid crystals”, Journal App. Phys. 44, 48-69-4874 (1973)

]. From eq. 2 it is possible to see that the amount of phase modulation depends on the thickness of the cell. However, the thicker a cell is the slower will be its response time. A trade-off between these two parameters has to be found. Another way around the limitation of the bandwidth is to use different type of LC materials. In this paper we describe the use of the so-called dual frequency nematic material and the results of a closed loop experiment involving a device filled with such material.

2. The dual frequency LC material.

The dielectric permittivities of all liquid crystals vary with the frequency, ν, of the applied field when ν>108 Hz. In the low frequency range, hundreds of Hz to tens of kHz, the two components of the dielectric constant, ε and ε are usually constant. However, for certain materials, at low frequencies, ε changes which leads to a change in sign of the dielectric anisotropy, Δε. For most nematic materials Δε is positive at the low end of frequency range of the applied voltage, and negative at the high end. The frequency at which Δε reverses sign is called the crossover frequency νc. The sign reversal of Δε can be used to orient the liquid crystal either with the optical axis parallel (Δε>0) or normal (Δε<0) to the direction of the electric field by selecting the frequency of the applied voltage. This phenomenon is usually much faster than in the conventional nematic material, where the re-orientation is based on next-neighbor recall forces. Figure 1 shows the result of a test conducted on a dual frequency material modulating one wave of retardance using 38kHz and 100 Hz, respectively, as the high and low drive frequencies, with respect to the cross-over frequency of the material.

Figure 1. Measured performances of dual frequency material vs. frequency

While the use of dual frequency material has been proposed in the past, a real functioning device with independently controllable pixels has been fabricated by Meadowlark Optics only in the past year under an SBIR program with the USAF Research Laboratory. This device has 127 individually controllable elements. The overall optical quality of the device gives a residual rms wavefront error of ~λ/4, at HeNe wavelength. The device is similar to the one with 127 polarization preserving elements, described in Restaino et al. [14

14. SR Restainoet al., “Progress report on the USAF Research Laboratory liquid crystal AO program”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. , 3353, 776–781 (1998)

]. However, few meaningful differences have to be pointed out. First of all in order to work with unpolarized light, this device was built using a quarter-wave plate with a thin reflective layer deposited after the plate, following the suggestion made by Love [16

16. G.D. Love, “Liquid crystal phase modulator for unpolarized light”, Appl. Opt. 32, 2222–2223 (1993) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This procedure allows a simpler control scheme, only 127 channels; however, the optical quality is lower due to intrinsic fabrication difficulties. Furthermore a small parallax error, due to the reflective nature of the device, reduces the overall ‘fill factor’ by a small amount, depending on the incident angle of the light.

3. Experimental Set-up and results

The set-up for the test of the closed loop performances of this device is illustrated in Fig.2. The main components of the set-up are: a Zygo interferometer, used as source of unaberrated wavefront, a Shack-Hartmann lenslet array matched to a CCD camera, DALSA 128×128, with a fast read-out frame rate. The exposure time of the CCD camera was of 10 milli-seconds. The disturbance source that generated degraded wavefronts consisted of a heat-source with a fan. In this way a dynamically changing degradation was obtained.

Figure 2. Schematic lay-out of the experiment
Figure 3. Average uncompensated and compensated images.
Figure 4. Video of the closed-loop experiment.(942 KB movie size)

4. Conclusions

As far as the authors are aware this is the first closed loop demonstration of a dual frequency nematic device with individually controlled pixels, used as an adaptive optics component. The device is very promising as an adaptive optics component and offers many potential advantages when compared to traditional deformable mirror technology. However, more research and testing need to be carried out in order to fully assess the capabilities of this technology.

References and links

1.

S.R. Restainoet al.., “Use of electro-optical devices for path-length compensation”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 2200,46–48 (1994)

2.

P.V. Mitchellet al. , “Innovative adaptive optics using liquid crystal light valve”, Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C. (1992)

3.

G.D. Love, J.S. Fender, and S.R. Restaino, “Adaptive wavefront shaping using liquid crystals”, Opt. And Phot. News 6, 16–20 (1995) [CrossRef]

4.

G.D. Love, “Wave-front correction and production of Zernike modes with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator”, App. Opt. 36, 1517–1524 (1997) [CrossRef]

5.

A.V. Kudryashov, J. Gonglewski, S. Browne, and R. Highland, “Liquid crystal phase modulator for adaptive optics. Temporal performance characteristics”, Opt. Comm. 141, 247–253 (1997) [CrossRef]

6.

DC Dayton, SL Browne, and S.P. Sandven et. Al., “Theory and laboratory demonstrations on the use of a nematic liquid-crystal phase modulator for controlled turbulence generation and adaptive optics”, App. Opt. 37, 5579–5589 (1998) [CrossRef]

7.

R.S. Dou and M.K. Giles, “Closed loop adaptive optics system with a liquid-crystal television as a phase retarder”, Opt. Lett. 20, 1583–1585 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

T.L. Kelly and G.D. Love, “White light performance of a polarization-independent liquid crystal phase modulator”, App. Opt. 38, 1986–1989 (1999) [CrossRef]

9.

J. Gourlay, G.D. Love, and P.M. Birch, et al. “A real time closed loop liquid crystal adaptive optics system: first results”, Opt. Comm. 137, 17–21 (1997) [CrossRef]

10.

D. Bonacciniet al., “Adaptive optics wavefront corrector using addressable liquid crystal retarders”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 1334, 89–97 (1990)

11.

A. Purviset al., “Optical design, simulation, and testing of an addressable 64×64 liquid crystal phase plate”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 2000, 96–98 (1993)

12.

V.A. Dorezyuk, A.F. Naumov, and V.I. Shmalgauzen, “Control of liquid crystal correctors in adaptive optical systems”, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 34, 1384 (1989)

13.

W. Klauset al., “Adaptive LC lens array and its applications”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 3635, 66–73 (1999)

14.

SR Restainoet al., “Progress report on the USAF Research Laboratory liquid crystal AO program”, Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. , 3353, 776–781 (1998)

15.

G. Labrunie and J. Robert, “Fluctuation and scattering of light in nematic liquid crystals”, Journal App. Phys. 44, 48-69-4874 (1973)

16.

G.D. Love, “Liquid crystal phase modulator for unpolarized light”, Appl. Opt. 32, 2222–2223 (1993) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(230.3720) Optical devices : Liquid-crystal devices

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: December 2, 1999
Published: January 3, 2000

Citation
Sergio Restaino, David Dayton, Stephen Browne, John Gonglewski, Jeff Baker, Sam Rogers, Scott Mcdermott, Joe Gallegos, and Mike Shilko, "On the use of dual frequency nematic material for adaptive optics systems: first results of a closed-loop experiment.," Opt. Express 6, 2-6 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-6-1-2


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S.R. Restaino et al., "Use of electro-optical devices for path-length compensation", Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 2200,46-48 (1994).
  2. P.V. Mitchell et al. , "Innovative adaptive optics using liquid crystal light valve", Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C. (1992).
  3. G.D. Love, J.S. Fender, S.R. Restaino, "Adaptive wavefront shaping using liquid crystals", Opt. And Phot. News 6, 16-20 (1995). [CrossRef]
  4. G.D. Love, "Wave-front correction and production of Zernike modes with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator", App. Opt. 36, 1517-1524 (1997) [CrossRef]
  5. A.V. Kudryashov, J. Gonglewski, S. Browne, R. Highland, "Liquid crystal phase modulator for adaptive optics. Temporal performance characteristics", Opt. Comm. 141, 247-253 (1997) [CrossRef]
  6. D.C. Dayton, S.L. Browne, S.P. Sandven et. al., "Theory and laboratory demonstrations on the use of a nematic liquid-crystal phase modulator for controlled turbulence generation and adaptive optics", App. Opt. 37, 5579-5589 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. R.S. Dou, M.K. Giles, "Closed loop adaptive optics system with a liquid-crystal television as a phase retarder", Opt. Lett. 20, 1583-1585 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. T.L. Kelly, G.D. Love, "White light performance of a polarization-independent liquid crystal phase modulator", App. Opt. 38, 1986-1989 (1999). [CrossRef]
  9. J. Gourlay, G.D. Love, P.M. Birch, et al. " A real time closed loop liquid crystal adaptive optics system: first results", Opt. Comm. 137, 17-21 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. D. Bonaccini et al., "Adaptive optics wavefront corrector using addressable liquid crystal retarders", Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 1334, 89-97 (1990)
  11. A. Purvis et al., "Optical design, simulation, and testing of an addressable 64X64 liquid crystal phase plate", Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 2000, 96-98 (1993).
  12. V.A. Dorezyuk, A.F. Naumov, V.I. Shmalgauzen, "Control of liquid crystal correctors in adaptive optical systems", Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 34, 1384 (1989).
  13. W. Klaus et al., "Adaptive LC lens array and its applications", Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng. 3635, 66-73 (1999).
  14. S.R. Restaino et al., "Progress report on the USAF Research Laboratory liquid crystal AO program", Proc. Soc. Phot. Opt. Instrum. Eng., 3353, 776-781 (1998)
  15. G. Labrunie, J. Robert, "Fluctuation and scattering of light in nematic liquid crystals", Journal App. Phys. 44, 48-69-4874 (1973).
  16. G.D. Love, "Liquid crystal phase modulator for unpolarized light", Appl. Opt. 32, 2222-2223 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Supplementary Material


» Media 1: MOV (108 KB)     

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited