OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: J. H. Eberly
  • Vol. 6, Iss. 13 — Jun. 19, 2000
  • pp: 251–256
« Show journal navigation

Diffusion of Cs atoms in Ne buffer gas measured by optical magnetic resonance tomography

D. Giel, G. Hinz, D. Nettels, and A. Weis  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 6, Issue 13, pp. 251-256 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.6.000251


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (236 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Optical magnetic resonance tomography uses optical pumping and the paramagnetic Faraday effect to image spin density distributions in optically thin media. In this paper we present an apparatus that allows to measure the distribution of spin-polarized Cs atoms, which we applied to study the diffusion of Cs in Ne buffer gas by time-resolved 2D-mapping of the evolution of an initial inhomogeneous spin distribution. The diffusion constant D0 for Cs in a Ne buffer gas of 1013 mbar is determined as 0.20(1) cm2/s.

© Optical Society of America

1 Introduction

Fig. 1. Experimental setup.

2 Experiment

The experiments were performed in a cubic quartz cell of 1 cm3 filled with Ne buffer gas (p=135 mbar) and condensed Cs (Fig. 1). The cell is located in the center of a solenoid used to apply the main field and two saddle coil pairs as well as one anti-Helmholtz coil pair for the generation of the field gradients. Radio-frequency is applied by a pair of Helmholtz coils. The cell and all coils are surrounded by a 1.5 mm thick cylindrical µ-metal shield (Ø=36 cm, l=60 cm) to reduce stray fields. Optical pumping is done with the beam from a diode laser whose frequency is locked to the F=4 component of the Cs D1-line at 894 nm using a dichroic atomic vapor lock [5

5. K. L. Corwin, Z. T. Lu, C. F. Hand, R. J. Epstein, and C. E. Wieman, “Frequency-stabilized diode laser with Zeeman shift in an atomic vapor,” Appl. Opt. 37, 3295 (1998). [CrossRef]

]. The pumping beam - expanded by means of a telescope - passes through a polarizer and a λ=4-plate and finally traverses the cell parallel to the main magnetic field. The inhomogeneity and position of the beam are controlled by monitoring the light scattered from a screen by means of a CCD camera. The beam is chopped mechanically with a period of 20 ms.

Fig. 2. Timing sequence of the experiment.

After the pumping beam is blocked by the chopper the longitudinal magnetization Mz is transferred into a transverse magnetization M +=Mx +iMy by a radio—frequency π/2-pulse, after which the transverse polarization starts to precess in the static field B0, producing a free induction decay (FID) of M +.

A second - free running - diode laser produces the linearly polarized probe beam which, after expansion to a diameter of 1.5 cm, intersects the pump beam at right angles within the cell. The probe laser is current-tuned to the frequency of maximum dispersion of the D2 transition without any active stabilization. The power of the probe beam is less than 100 µ W in order to minimize disturbing effects due to absorption of the probe beam. The paramagnetic rotation of the light polarization produced by the vapor magnetization is detected using an ‘autobalanced’ photodetector (New Focus, model Nirvana) and a polarizing beamsplitter cube orientated at 45° with respect to the incident polarization. The coherent transient signal (FID) is observed as the difference of the photocurrents of two photodiodes at the output ports of the polarizer.

In order to synchronize the radio-frequency pulses (provided by a waveform generator), the strength and orientation of the gradients and the detection of the FID (recorded by an ADC plug-in module), all devices are triggered by a multi-channel pulse generator and controlled by a personal computer. The pulse generator itself is triggered by the mechanical shutter.

After a delay time tdelay following the optical pumping pulse the imaging process is started through the application of the π/2-rf-pulse (Fig.2). Gradient fields are switched on at the same time to encode the spin density. The FID is recorded and stored on hard disk for off-line processing. A single tomographic snapshot of the diffusion process is taken by recording 40 FID’s with gradients of identical magnitude and different orientations in a plane perpendicular to B̂0. A projection reconstruction (PR) algorithm is used to reconstruct the 2-dimensional spin density distribution [6

6. P. T. Callaghan, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).

]. For the tomography of our diffusion-limited gaseous Cs sample the PR algorithm is more suitable than a Fourier imaging algorithm.

The space-time evolution of the magnetization can be calculated by solving the diffusion equation including relaxation for the magnetization Mz (x⃗)

Mzt=D2MzK·Mz
(1)

for a given initial distribution of magnetization. K is the rate of homogeneous depolarization due to collisions with bu er gas atoms and residual absorption of the probe beam. D is the diffusion constant at the actual buffer gas density. As collisions with the cell walls destroy the polarization, the boundary conditions of Eq. (1) are simply that the magnetization Mz vanishes at the cell walls. The solutions of Eq. (1) for a cubic cell can hence be expanded in terms of cosine functions with a spatial periodicity of ni·a2 where a is the cell dimension and ni are integers:

Mz=l,m,n=1cl,m,ncos(lπxa)cos(mπya)cos(nπza)e(γl,m,n+K)t
(2)
Fig. 3. Tomographic picture (a) of an inhomogeneous polarization produced by a mask (b) inside the pump beam. (c) is a cut through distribution showing the Gaussian shapes (blue line) resulting from the diffusion of an initial cylindrical distribution (rectangles).

These functions are commonly referred to as diffusion modes. Each three-dimensional mode is labeled by a triplet (l, m, n) of integers and decays exponentially with a time constant

Tl,m,n=1γl,m,n=a2πD(l2+m2+n2).
(3)

In order to simulate the diffusion process we expand the measured initial spin distribution into cubic diffusion modes. As the time development of each mode is known, this allows to compare measured and calculated distributions at later times and to determine the diffusion constant D. We determined the spatial resolution of the imaging process and calibrated the magnitude of the gradient fields by recording the magnetization generated by pumping the cell through a calibration mask inserted into the pump beam. Fig. 3 shows an example where the mask consisted of six circular apertures (Ø=1 mm, 2.5 mm separation). The tomographic image of the created polarization pattern is amplitude coded. Each initial cylindrically shaped distribution of the magnetization is convoluted with a Gaussian distribution due to diffusion during the FID. From the widths of the peaks we determined the experimental resolution to be 360(20) µm.

3 Discussion

In order to measure the diffusion of the spin polarized cesium atoms within the cell, we first prepare a spatially inhomogeneous distribution of spin polarization using a masking aperture of approximately 2 mm clear diameter centered in the pump beam. Stroboscobic pictures of the diffusion process are obtained by varying tdelay in steps of 0.5 ms from 0 to 10 ms after the pump pulse. The animation linked to Fig. 4 (left side) shows the measured evolution in a cell with a buffer gas pressure of 135 mbar. Cuts through the distribution are shown in Fig. 6. According to the model outlined above the higher order diffusion modes vanish quickly until only the lowest order mode remains visible; the distribution evolves from an initial Gaussian-shaped distribution to a pure cosine-shaped distribution (lowest order diffusion mode).

In order to extract a quantitative value of the diffusion coffiecient D from the measured distributions we proceeded as follows: We first determined the width Δx FWHM of each measured distribution. The results are shown as dots in Fig. 7. For an open cell (no boundaries) one would expect Δx FWHM to vary according to

Fig. 4. Experimental (left) and simulated (right) evolutions of a given initial experimental magnetization distribution (Animation, 1.1 MB). The frames are separated by Δtdelay=0.5 ms.
Fig. 5. The same as Fig. 4 but with the distributions at each step of tdelay normalized to the same peak height to demonstrate the change of shape due to diffusion. (Animation, 1.4 MB)
ΔxFWHM2=2Dt.
(4)

The deviation of the experimental results from this simple law is due to the cell boundaries i.e. to the rapid damping of the higher order diffusion modes. We simulated the actual experimental situation by decomposing numerically the distribution at tdelay=0 into diffusion modes (Eq. (2)), calculating the relaxation of each mode according to Eq. (3), reassembling the relaxed modes and finally determining the widths of the relaxed distributions. The values thus obtained are shown as curved line in Fig. 7. Adjustment of the calculated widths was done by a X 2-minimizing procedure that varied the parameter D. Note that one of the main advantages of our method is the fact that the determination of x FWHM depends only on D and is independent of K. We obtained a minimal X 2 value for D=1.73(4) cm2=s from data recorded at T=51(2) °C. The straight line in Fig. 7 is given by Eq. (4) with this optimal value of D. The animations on the right hand sides of Figs. (4,5) show the simulated distributions after the fitting procedure.

It is customary to scale the diffusion constant D 0 to standard pressure (p 0=1013 mbar) and temperature (T 0=20°C) via the relation

D=D0p0p(TT0)32.
(5)

We determined the Ne buffer gas pressure p in our cell in an auxiliary experiment by measuring the pressure shift of the F=3, M=0→F=4, M=0 hyperfine clock transition of the ground state in an optical-microwave double resonance experiment. A small magnetic field (5 µT) was applied in order to lift the Zeeman degeneracy of the ground state sublevels and to isolate the 0-0 transition. The transition-frequency was found to be shifted by 62.0(2) kHz with respect to the clock frequency of 9.19263177 GHz. From the pressure shift measurements described in [8

8. N. Beverini, F. Strumia, and G. Rovera, “Buffer gas pressure shift in the mF=0→mF=0 ground state hyperne line in Cs,” Opt. Commun. 37,6, 394 (1981). [CrossRef]

] we conclude that the buffer gas pressure in our cell at T=51(2) °C is p=135(5) mbar. This gives a reduced diffusion coefficient of

Fig. 6. Time Evolution of cuts through the spin density distribution
Fig. 7. Time evolution of the widths Δx FWHM of the magnetization distributions (dots). Solid line: Solution Eq. (1) with D=1.73 cm2/s. Straight line: Theoretical evolution without boundaries (’open’ cell), ΔxFWHM2=2Dt.
D0=0.20(1)cm2s.
(6)

The literature shows a broad range of experimental values for the diffusion constant of cesium in neon buffer gas, ranging from 0.40 cm2/s down to D 0=0.10 cm2/s (Measured values up to 1989 are tabulated in [9

9. J. Vanier and C. Audoin, The Quantum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards (Bristol, Hilger, 1989). [CrossRef]

]). In most of these experiments, the diffusion constant is deduced from the measurement of the longitudinal relaxation time T1 as a function of buffer gas pressure. Diffusion to the walls as well as depolarizing collisions cause the magnetization to vanish. In the analysis of this integral measurement there is a strong correlation between the parameters describing the diffusion and the depolarization and even small (depolarizing) admixtures of paramagnetic impurities to the buffer gas can influence the inferred diffusion constants significantly. The direct space- and time-resolved measurement of the diffusion constant in our experiment is not affected by depolarization processes due to impurities or depolarizing scattering of probe laser radiation.

4 Conclusion and outlook

We have developed a novel technique for the quantitative measurement of the diffusion constant of spin polarized alkali atoms in a noble gas. The technique allows to determine the diffusion constant D of Cs in Ne with a precision of 2%, while the reduced diffusion constant D 0 could be determined with precision of 4% only, due to the uncertainty of the buffer gas pressure. Compared to previously used techniques our method is insensitive to uncertainties in the relaxation times. Moreover the diffusion constant D - of dimension (length)2/time - is easily calibrated, the length scale being determined by a calibrating mask and the time scale being given by the delay generating synthesizer used. In the future we plan to apply the technique presented here to samples of Cs atoms embedded in crystalline 4 He matrices [10

10. S. I. Karnorsky and A. Weis, “Optical and magneto-optical spectroscopy of point defects in condensed helium,” Advances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , 38, 87 (1998). [CrossRef]

] in order to study their spatial distribution. The strongly suppressed diffusion in these samples and the very long coherence times T 2>300 ms should allow to achieve spatial resolutions in the micron range.

References and links

1.

D. Nettels, “Optische Magnetresonanztomographie an spinpolarisiertem Cäsiumdampf,” Dipl. the-sis Univ. Bonn (unpublished)(1998).

2.

D. Giel, “Darstellung der Diffusion atomarer Spinpolarisation mit optischer Magnetresonanzto-mographie,” Dipl. thesis Univ. Bonn (unpublished)(2000).

3.

J. Skalla, G. Wäckerle, M. Mehring, and A. Pines, “Optical magnetic resonance imaging of vapor in low magnetic fields,” Phys. Lett. A 226, 69–74 (1997). [CrossRef]

4.

K. Ishikawa et al., “Optical magnetic resonance imaging of laser-polarized Cs atoms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 31–37 (1999). [CrossRef]

5.

K. L. Corwin, Z. T. Lu, C. F. Hand, R. J. Epstein, and C. E. Wieman, “Frequency-stabilized diode laser with Zeeman shift in an atomic vapor,” Appl. Opt. 37, 3295 (1998). [CrossRef]

6.

P. T. Callaghan, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).

7.

A. Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1977).

8.

N. Beverini, F. Strumia, and G. Rovera, “Buffer gas pressure shift in the mF=0→mF=0 ground state hyperne line in Cs,” Opt. Commun. 37,6, 394 (1981). [CrossRef]

9.

J. Vanier and C. Audoin, The Quantum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards (Bristol, Hilger, 1989). [CrossRef]

10.

S. I. Karnorsky and A. Weis, “Optical and magneto-optical spectroscopy of point defects in condensed helium,” Advances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , 38, 87 (1998). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(020.0020) Atomic and molecular physics : Atomic and molecular physics
(110.6960) Imaging systems : Tomography
(290.1990) Scattering : Diffusion

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: May 16, 2000
Published: June 19, 2000

Citation
D. Giel, G. Hinz, D. Nettels, and Antoine Weis, "Diffusion of Cs atoms in Ne buffer gas measured by optical magnetic resonance tomography," Opt. Express 6, 251-256 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-6-13-251


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Nettels, "Optische Magnetresonanztomographie an spinpolarisiertem Casiumdampf," Dipl. thesis Univ. Bonn (unpublished)(1998).
  2. D. Giel, "Darstellung der Diffusion atomarer Spinpolarisation mit optischer Magnetresonanztomographie," Dipl. thesis Univ. Bonn (unpublished)(2000).
  3. J. Skalla, G.Wackerle, M. Mehring and A. Pines, "Optical magnetic resonance imaging of vapor in low magnetic fields," Phys. Lett. A 226, 69-74 (1997). [CrossRef]
  4. K. Ishikawa et al., "Optical magnetic resonance imaging of laser-polarized Cs atoms," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 31-37 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. K. L. Corwin, Z. T. Lu, C. F. Hand, R. J. Epstein and C. E. Wieman, "Frequency-stabilized diode laser with Zeeman shift in an atomic vapor," Appl. Opt. 37, 3295 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. P. T. Callaghan, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).
  7. A. Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1977).
  8. N. Beverini, F. Strumia and G. Rovera, "Buffer gas pressure shift in the mF =0->mF =0 ground state hyperfine line in Cs," Opt. Commun. 37,6, 394 (1981). [CrossRef]
  9. J. Vanier, C. Audoin, The Quantum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards (Bristol, Hilger, 1989). [CrossRef]
  10. S. I. Karnorsky and A. Weis, "Optical and magneto-optical spectroscopy of point defects in condensed helium," Advances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 38, 87 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Supplementary Material


» Media 1: MOV (1026 KB)     
» Media 2: MOV (1364 KB)     

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited