Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Amplitude ambiguities in second-harmonic-generation frequency-resolved optical gating: comment

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

The authors of an earlier paper [Opt. Lett. 32, 3558 (2007) ] reported two “ambiguities” in second-harmonic-generation frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG). One ambiguity is simply wrong—a miscalculation. The other is well known and easily avoided in simple well-known FROG variations. Finally, the authors’ main conclusion—that autocorrelation can be more sensitive to pulse variations than FROG—is also wrong.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Amplitude ambiguities in second-harmonic-generation frequency-resolved optical gating: reply to comment

Balakishore Yellampalle, KiYong Kim, and Antoinette J. Taylor
Opt. Lett. 34(17) 2603-2603 (2009)

Amplitude ambiguities in second-harmonic generation frequency-resolved optical gating

Balakishore Yellampalle, KiYong Kim, and Antoniette J. Taylor
Opt. Lett. 32(24) 3558-3560 (2007)

Amplitude ambiguities in second-harmonic generation frequency-resolved optical gating: erratum

Balakishore Yellampalle, KiYong Kim, and Antoniette J. Taylor
Opt. Lett. 33(23) 2854-2854 (2008)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved