OSA's Digital Library

Optics Letters

Optics Letters

| RAPID, SHORT PUBLICATIONS ON THE LATEST IN OPTICAL DISCOVERIES

  • Editor: Alan E. Willner
  • Vol. 35, Iss. 21 — Nov. 1, 2010
  • pp: 3562–3564

Demonstration of a quasi-scalar angular Goos–Hänchen effect

M. Merano, N. Hermosa, A. Aiello, and J. P. Woerdman  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 21, pp. 3562-3564 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003562


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (270 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We show experimentally that the angular Goos–Hänchen (GH) effect can be easily observed, also without employing its resonant enhancement at Brewster incidence. An s-polarized beam was used to decouple the polarization from the propagation dynamics of the beam. We found that, in this case, the angular GH effect can be strongly enhanced by increasing the angular aperture of the Gaussian beam. Our experiments suggest a route toward observing the angular GH effect for true scalar waves, such as acoustic waves and quantum matter waves.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization
(240.3695) Optics at surfaces : Linear and nonlinear light scattering from surfaces

ToC Category:
Physical Optics

History
Original Manuscript: July 8, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: August 9, 2010
Published: October 19, 2010

Citation
M. Merano, N. Hermosa, A. Aiello, and J. P. Woerdman, "Demonstration of a quasi-scalar angular Goos-Hänchen effect," Opt. Lett. 35, 3562-3564 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-35-21-3562


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Goos and H. Hänchen, Ann. Phys. 436, 333 (1947). [CrossRef]
  2. F. Bretenaker, A. L. Floch, and L. Dutriaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 931 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. Merano, A. Aiello, M. P. van Exter, and J. P. Woerdman, Nat. Photon. 3, 337 (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. M. Merano, A. Aiello, G. W. 't Hooft, M. P. van Exter, E. R. Eliel, and J. P. Woerdman, Opt. Express 15, 15928 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. D. Müller, D. Tharanga, A. A. Stahlhofen, and G. Nimtz, Europhys. Lett. 73, 526 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. J. W. Ra, H. L. Bertoni, and L. B. Felsen, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 24, 396 (1973). [CrossRef]
  7. Y. M. Antar and W. M. Boerner, Can. J. Phys. 52, 962(1974).
  8. C. C. Chan and T. Tamir, Opt. Lett. 10, 378 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. M. A. Porras, Opt. Commun. 131, 13 (1996). [CrossRef]
  10. W. Nasalski, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 172 (1996). [CrossRef]
  11. A. Aiello and J. P. Woerdman, Opt. Lett. 33, 1437 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 073903 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. V. G. Fedoseyev, Opt. Commun. 282, 1247 (2009). [CrossRef]
  14. O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Acoustic waves are not scalar waves in general. For example, acoustic waves in solid-state physics can be nonscalar.
  16. A. Schoch, Acustica 2, 18 (1952).
  17. H. L. Bertoni and T. Tamir, Appl. Phys. 2, 157 (1973). [CrossRef]
  18. C. Bonnet, D. Chauvat, O. Emile, F. Bretenaker, A. L. Floch, and L. Dutriaux, Opt. Lett. 26, 666 (2001). [CrossRef]
  19. A. Teklu, M. A. Breazeale, N. F. Declercq, R. D. Hasse, and M. S. McPherson, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 084904 (2005). [CrossRef]
  20. S. C. Miller, Jr., and N. Ashby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 740(1972). [CrossRef]
  21. J. Huang, Z. Duan, H. Y. Ling, and W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 77, 063608 (2008). [CrossRef]
  22. V. O. de Haan, J. Plomp, T. M. Rekveldt, W. H. Kraan, and A. A. van Well, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010401 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. M. Maaza and B. Pardo, Opt. Commun. 142, 84(1997). [CrossRef]
  24. The difference between a neutron and a photon from a spin (polarization) point of view is as follows. A neutron is a massive particle whose spin ½ is not coupled to the propagation direction of the neutron beam; contrarily, a photon is a zero-mass particle whose paraxial spin ½ is either parallel or antiparallel with the propagation direction of the photon beam.
  25. Y. Fainman and J. Shamir, Appl. Opt. 23, 3188 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. Aiello, M. Merano, and J. P. Woerdman, Opt. Lett. 34, 1207 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited