Abstract

Imaging polarimeters infer the spatial distribution of the polarization state of the optical field as a function of time and/or wavelength. A polarimeter indirectly determines the polarization state by first modulating the intensity of the light field and then demodulating the measured data to infer the polarization parameters. This Letter considers passive Stokes parameter polarimeters and their inversion methods. The most widely used method is the data reduction matrix (DRM), which builds up a matrix equation that can be inverted to find the polarization state from a set of intensity measurements. An alternate strategy uses linear system formulations that allow band limited reconstruction through a filtering perspective. Here we compare these two strategies for overdetermined polarimeters and find that design of the null space of the inversion operator provides degrees of freedom to optimize the trade off between accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio. We further describe adaptive filtering techniques that could optimize the reconstruction for a particular experimental configuration. This Letter considers time-varying Stokes parameters, but the methods apply equally to polarimeters that are modulated in space or in wavelength.

©2012 Optical Society of America

Band limited data reconstruction in modulated polarimeters

Charles F. LaCasse, Russell A. Chipman, and J. Scott Tyo
Opt. Express 19(16) 14976-14989 (2011)

Spectral density response functions for modulated polarimeters

Charles F. LaCasse, Oscar G. Rodríguez-Herrera, Russell A. Chipman, and J. Scott Tyo
Appl. Opt. 54(32) 9490-9499 (2015)

Imaging dynamic scenes with a spatio-temporally channeled polarimeter

Jiawei Song, Israel J. Vaughn, Andrey S. Alenin, and J. Scott Tyo
Opt. Express 27(20) 28423-28436 (2019)

Noise equalization in Stokes parameter images obtained by use of variable-retardance polarimeters

J. Scott Tyo
Opt. Lett. 25(16) 1198-1200 (2000)

Snapshot imaging Mueller matrix polarimeter using polarization gratings

Michael W. Kudenov, Michael J. Escuti, Nathan Hagen, Eustace L. Dereniak, and Kazuhiko Oka
Opt. Lett. 37(8) 1367-1369 (2012)