OSA's Digital Library

Optics Letters

Optics Letters

| RAPID, SHORT PUBLICATIONS ON THE LATEST IN OPTICAL DISCOVERIES

  • Vol. 26, Iss. 11 — Jun. 1, 2001
  • pp: 840–842

Deterministic vectorial effects lead to multiple filamentation

G. Fibich and B. Ilan  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Letters, Vol. 26, Issue 11, pp. 840-842 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.000840


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (925 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The standard explanation for multiple filamentation of laser pulses is that it is caused by noise in the input beam. We propose an alternative explanation that is based on deterministic vectorial (polarization) effects. We present numerical simulations in support of the vectorial-effects explanation and suggest a simple experiment for deciding whether multiple filamentation is due to vectorial effects.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(260.5950) Physical optics : Self-focusing

Citation
G. Fibich and B. Ilan, "Deterministic vectorial effects lead to multiple filamentation," Opt. Lett. 26, 840-842 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-26-11-840


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic, Boston, Mass., 1992).
  2. P. D. Maker, R. W. Terhune, and C. M. Savage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 507 (1964).
  3. For example, g=0 (electrostriction), g=0.5 (nonresonant electrons), and g=3 (molecular orientation).
  4. P. L. Kelley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 1005 (1965).
  5. G. Fibich and A. Gaeta, Opt. Lett. 25, 335 (2000).
  6. N. F. Pilipetskii and A. R. Rustamov, JETP Lett. 2, 55 (1965).
  7. V. I. Bespalov and V. I. Talanov, JETP Lett. 3, 307 (1966).
  8. G. Fibich and B. Ilan, “Vectorial and random effects in self-focusing and in multiple filamentation,” www.math.tau.ac.il/~fibich.
  9. The vectorial effects in Eq. 5 result only from coupling between A1 and A3, because the effect of coupling to A2 is O(f4).
  10. S. Chi and Q. Guo, Opt. Lett. 20, 1598 (1995).
  11. B. Crosignani, P. D. Porto, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 22, 778 (1997).
  12. B. Crosignani, P. D. Porto, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 22, 1820 (1997), erratum of Ref. 11.
  13. R. de la Fuente, O. Varela, and H. Michinel, Opt. Commun. 173, 403 (2000).
  14. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report of simulations in which noise in the input beam did lead to multiple filamentation in the unperturbed NLS (6).
  15. A. V. Nowak and D. O. Ham, Opt. Lett. 6, 185 (1981).
  16. J. M. Soto-Crespo, E. M. Wright, and N. N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3168 (1992).
  17. J. Atai, Y. Chen, and J. M. Soto-Crespo, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3170 (1994).
  18. F. Vidal and T. W. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 1282 (1996).
  19. S. Gatz and J. Hermann, Opt. Lett. 23, 1176 (1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited