OSA's Digital Library

Optics Letters

Optics Letters

| RAPID, SHORT PUBLICATIONS ON THE LATEST IN OPTICAL DISCOVERIES

  • Vol. 28, Iss. 8 — Apr. 15, 2003
  • pp: 637–639

Nonlinear photonic crystal microdevices for optical integration

Marin Soljačić, Chiyan Luo, J. D. Joannopoulos, and Shanhui Fan  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Letters, Vol. 28, Issue 8, pp. 637-639 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.000637


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1291 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A four-port nonlinear photonic crystal system is discussed that exhibits optical bistability with negligible backscattering to the inputs, making it particularly suitable for integration with other active devices on the same chip. Devices based on this system can be made to be small [O3)] in volume, have a nearly instantaneous response, and consume only a few milliwatts of power. Among many possible applications, we focus on an all-optical transistor and integrated optical isolation.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(190.1450) Nonlinear optics : Bistability
(190.4360) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, devices

Citation
Marin Soljačić, Chiyan Luo, J. D. Joannopoulos, and Shanhui Fan, "Nonlinear photonic crystal microdevices for optical integration," Opt. Lett. 28, 637-639 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-28-8-637


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics (Wiley, New York, 1991).
  2. M. Soljačić, M. Ibanescu, S. G. Johnson, Y. Fink, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Phys. Rev. E 66, 055601(R) (2002).
  3. S. F. Mingaleev and Y. S. Kivshar, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 2241 (2002).
  4. S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, J. D. Joannopoulos, and H. A. Haus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 960 (1998).
  5. There also exist stable states of the system that are not left–right symmetric; we were able to excite them with particular initial conditions purposely designed to ruin the left–right symmetry. Nevertheless, the states that respect left–right symmetry appear to be particularly stable; various nonlinearly induced left–right asymmetries (at typcial operating power levels) with as large as 10% differences in the energies stored in the two cavities did not destabilize them.
  6. For a review, see A. Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1995).
  7. M. L. Povinelli, S. G. Johnson, S. Fan, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Phys. Rev. B 64, 075313 (2001).
  8. M. Scalora, J. P. Dowling, M. J. Bloemer, and C. M. Bowden, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2023 (1994).
  9. K. Gallo, G. Assanto, K. R. Parameswaran, and M. M. Fejer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 314 (2001).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited