We comment on the recent Letter by Jiao <i>et al.</i> [Opt. Lett. <i>28,</i> 1206 (2003)] in which a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system was presented. Interrogating a sample with two orthogonal incident polarization states cannot always recover birefringence correctly. A previously presented fiber-based polarization-sensitive system was inaccurately characterized, and its method of eliminating the polarization distortion caused by single-mode optical fiber was presented earlier by Saxer <i>et al.</i> [Opt. Lett. <i>25,</i> 1355 (2000)].
© 2004 Optical Society of America
(120.2130) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Ellipsometry and polarimetry
(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical optics and biotechnology
(170.1870) Medical optics and biotechnology : Dermatology
(170.4500) Medical optics and biotechnology : Optical coherence tomography
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization
B. Hyle Park, Mark C. Pierce, and Johannes F. de Boer, "Comment on "Optical-fiber-based Mueller optical coherence tomography"," Opt. Lett. 29, 2873-2874 (2004)