It is shown that, even using the mathematical treatment proposed by the comment [ Opt. Lett. 35, 265 (2010) ], the results of our paper will be revised only in quantity. The qualitative features, i.e., negative $\mathrm{Im}\left[\sigma \right]$ (imaginary conductivity) of AlInN, are unchanged. Otherwise, the method used by Schneider, which produces positive $\mathrm{Im}\left[\sigma \right]$ based only on $|E_{\text{film}}\left(\omega \right)∕E_{\mathrm{ref}}\left(\omega \right)|$ value, is proved to be incorrect.