OSA's Digital Library

Optics Letters

Optics Letters

| RAPID, SHORT PUBLICATIONS ON THE LATEST IN OPTICAL DISCOVERIES

  • Editor: Alan E. Willner
  • Vol. 38, Iss. 16 — Aug. 15, 2013
  • pp: 3099–3102

Revealing interference by continuous variable discordant states

A. Meda, S. Olivares, I. P. Degiovanni, G. Brida, M. Genovese, and M. G. A. Paris  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 16, pp. 3099-3102 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.003099


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (273 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In general, a pair of uncorrelated Gaussian states mixed in a beam splitter (BS) produces a correlated state at the output. However, when the inputs are identical Gaussian states the output state is equal to the input, and no correlations appear, as the interference had not taken place. On the other hand, since physical phenomena do have observable effects, and the BS is there, a question arises on how to reveal the interference between the two beams. We prove theoretically and demonstrate experimentally that this is possible if at least one of the two beams is prepared in a discordant, i.e., Gaussian correlated, state with a third beam. We also apply the same technique to reveal the erasure of polarization information. Our experiment involves thermal states and the results show that Gaussian discordant states, even when they show a positive Glauber P-function, may be useful to achieve specific tasks.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(270.0270) Quantum optics : Quantum optics
(270.5290) Quantum optics : Photon statistics
(270.6570) Quantum optics : Squeezed states

ToC Category:
Quantum Optics

History
Original Manuscript: May 13, 2013
Revised Manuscript: July 12, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: July 12, 2013
Published: August 13, 2013

Citation
A. Meda, S. Olivares, I. P. Degiovanni, G. Brida, M. Genovese, and M. G. A. Paris, "Revealing interference by continuous variable discordant states," Opt. Lett. 38, 3099-3102 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-38-16-3099


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655 (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. D. Girolami and G. Adesso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 150403 (2012). [CrossRef]
  3. D. Girolami and G. Adesso, Int. J. Quantum. Inform. 9, 1773 (2011). [CrossRef]
  4. A. Streltsov, S. M. Giampaolo, W. Roga, D. Bruss, and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012313 (2013). [CrossRef]
  5. A. Ferraro and M. Paris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 260403 (2012). [CrossRef]
  6. W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013605 (2008). [CrossRef]
  7. C. Gehrke, J. Sperling, and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052118 (2012). [CrossRef]
  8. H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012320 (2003). [CrossRef]
  10. L. Henderson and V. Vedral, J. Phys. A 34, 6899 (2001). [CrossRef]
  11. P. Giorda and M. Paris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 020503 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. G. Adesso and A. Datta, Phys. Rev. Lett 105, 030501 (2010). [CrossRef]
  13. M. D. Lang, C. M. Caves, and A. Shaji, Int. J. Quantum. Inform. 9, 1553 (2011). [CrossRef]
  14. R. Blandino, M. G. Genoni, J. Etesse, M. Barbieri, M. G. A. Paris, P. Grangier, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180402 (2012). [CrossRef]
  15. L. S. Madsen, A. Berni, M. Lassen, and U. L. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 030402 (2012). [CrossRef]
  16. V. Madhok and A. Datta, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1345041 (2013). [CrossRef]
  17. R. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963). [CrossRef]
  18. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963). [CrossRef]
  19. S. Rahimi-Keshari, C. M. Caves, and T. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012119 (2013). [CrossRef]
  20. P. Giorda, M. Allegra, and M. G. A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052328 (2012). [CrossRef]
  21. Since we are interested in correlations, we may safely assume that both the input states have zero first moments without any loss of generality.
  22. A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, M. Piani, and D. Bruss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050503 (2012). [CrossRef]
  23. S. Olivares and M. G. A. Paris, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1345024 (2013). [CrossRef]
  24. S. Olivares and M. G. A. Paris, Metrologia 49, L14 (2012). [CrossRef]
  25. P. G. Kwiat, A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7729 (1992). [CrossRef]
  26. M. Gu, H. M. Chrzanowski, S. M. Assad, T. Symul, K. Modi, T. C. Ralph, V. Vedral, and P. Koy Lam, Nat. Phys. 8, 671 (2012). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited