OSA's Digital Library

Optics Letters

Optics Letters

| RAPID, SHORT PUBLICATIONS ON THE LATEST IN OPTICAL DISCOVERIES

  • Editor: Xi-Cheng Zhang
  • Vol. 39, Iss. 11 — Jun. 1, 2014
  • pp: 3102–3105

Molecular specificity in photoacoustic microscopy by time-resolved transient absorption

Ryan L. Shelton, Scott P. Mattison, and Brian E. Applegate  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 11, pp. 3102-3105 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003102


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (339 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We have recently harnessed transient absorption, a resonant two-photon process, for ultrahigh resolution photoacoustic microscopy, achieving nearly an order of magnitude improvement in axial resolution. The axial resolution is optically constrained due to the two-photon process unlike traditional photoacoustic microscopy where the axial resolution is inversely proportional to the frequency bandwidth of the detector. As a resonant process, the arrival time of the two photons need not be instantaneous. Systematically recording the signal as a function of the delay between two pulses will result in the measurement of an exponential decay whose time constant is related to the molecular dynamics. This time constant, analogous to the fluorescence lifetime, but encompassing nonradiative decay as well, can be used to differentiate between molecular systems with overlapping absorption spectra. This is frequently the situation for closely related yet distinct molecules such as redox pairs. In order to enable the measure of the exponential decay, we have reconfigured our transient absorption ultrasonic microscopy (TAUM) system to incorporate two laser sources with precisely controlled pulse trains. The system was tested by measuring Rhodamine 6G, an efficient laser dye where the molecular dynamics are dominated by the fluorescence pathway. As expected, the measured exponential time constant or ground state recovery time, 3.3 ± 0.7 ns , was similar to the well-known fluorescence lifetime, 4.11 ± 0.05 ns . Oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin are the quintessential pair whose relative concentration is related to the local blood oxygen saturation. We have measured the ground state recovery times of these two species in fully oxygenated and deoxygenated bovine whole blood to be 3.7 ± 0.8 ns and 7.9 ± 1.0 ns , respectively. Hence, even very closely related pairs of molecules may be differentiated with this technique.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.5120) Imaging systems : Photoacoustic imaging
(170.3650) Medical optics and biotechnology : Lifetime-based sensing
(170.6920) Medical optics and biotechnology : Time-resolved imaging
(180.4315) Microscopy : Nonlinear microscopy

ToC Category:
Medical Optics and Biotechnology

History
Original Manuscript: January 22, 2014
Revised Manuscript: April 21, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: April 21, 2014
Published: May 19, 2014

Citation
Ryan L. Shelton, Scott P. Mattison, and Brian E. Applegate, "Molecular specificity in photoacoustic microscopy by time-resolved transient absorption," Opt. Lett. 39, 3102-3105 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-39-11-3102


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. L. V. Wang and S. Hu, Science 335, 1458 (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. K. Maslov, H. F. Zhang, S. Hu, and L. V. Wang, Opt. Lett. 33, 929 (2008). [CrossRef]
  3. R. L. Shelton and B. E. Applegate, Biomed. Opt. Express 1, 676 (2010). [CrossRef]
  4. R. L. Shelton, S. P. Mattison, and B. E. Applegate, “Volumetric imaging of erythrocytes using label-free multiphoton photoacoustic microscopy,” J. Biophoton., doi:10.1002/jbio.201300059 (2013). [CrossRef]
  5. S. W. Huang, J. F. Eary, C. X. Jia, L. Y. Huang, S. Ashkenazi, and M. O’Donnell, Opt. Lett. 34, 2393 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. S. Ashkenazi, S. W. Huang, T. Horvath, Y. E. L. Koo, and R. Kopelman, J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 034023 (2008). [CrossRef]
  7. S. Ashkenazi, J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 040501 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. Q. Shao, E. Morgounova, C. Jiang, J. Choi, J. Bischof, and S. Ashkenazi, J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 076019 (2013). [CrossRef]
  9. D. Fu, T. Ye, T. E. Matthews, G. Yurtsever, and W. S. Warren, J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 054004 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. R. F. Kubin and A. N. Fletcher, J. Lumin. 27, 455 (1982). [CrossRef]
  11. Q. S. Hanley, V. Subramaniam, D. J. Arndt-Jovin, and T. M. Jovin, Cytometry 43, 248 (2001). [CrossRef]
  12. B. E. Applegate and J. A. Izatt, Opt. Express 14, 9142 (2006). [CrossRef]
  13. K. Dalziel and J. R. P. O’brien, Biochem. J. 78, 236 (1961).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited