OSA's Digital Library

Optical Materials Express

Optical Materials Express

  • Editor: David J. Hagan
  • Vol. 2, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2012
  • pp: 864–871

Tuning the magneto-optic response of maghemite doped poly(phenylmethylvinyl siloxane) through electric field based nanoparticle orientation

Ganapathy Kumar, Satish M. Mahajan, Holly A. Stretz, and Sanjay K. Apte  »View Author Affiliations


Optical Materials Express, Vol. 2, Issue 6, pp. 864-871 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OME.2.000864


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1682 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Maghemite nanoparticles were doped in optical poly phenyl methyl vinyl siloxane and oriented by externally applied electric fields before curing. Consequent change in the morphology of the nanocomposite was observed and characterized using small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). After curing, Faraday rotation measurements were carried out at 632.8 nm. Electric field based alignment in addition to presence of the nanodopants enhanced the magneto-optic sensitivity by 14.3-48.6% for the polymer nanocomposites. A linear trend was observed between orienting electric fields and measured Faraday rotation angles. Limits on applicable electric fields for dopant concentrations were also ascertained from the magneto-optic response.

© 2012 OSA

OCIS Codes
(160.3820) Materials : Magneto-optical materials
(230.3810) Optical devices : Magneto-optic systems

ToC Category:
Magneto-Optical Materials

History
Original Manuscript: April 30, 2012
Revised Manuscript: May 20, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: May 21, 2012
Published: May 24, 2012

Citation
Ganapathy Kumar, Satish M. Mahajan, Holly A. Stretz, and Sanjay K. Apte, "Tuning the magneto-optic response of maghemite doped poly(phenylmethylvinyl siloxane) through electric field based nanoparticle orientation," Opt. Mater. Express 2, 864-871 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ome/abstract.cfm?URI=ome-2-6-864


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. P. R. Watekar, S. Ju, S. A. Kim, S. Jeong, Y. Kim, and W. T. Han, “Development of a highly sensitive compact sized optical fiber current sensor,” Opt. Express18(16), 17096–17105 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. H. Yoshida, K. Tsubakimoto, Y. Fujimoto, K. Mikami, H. Fujita, N. Miyanaga, H. Nozawa, H. Yagi, T. Yanagitani, Y. Nagata, and H. Kinoshita, “Optical properties and Faraday effect of ceramic terbium gallium garnet for a room temperature Faraday rotator,” Opt. Express19(16), 15181–15187 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. I. Savchuk, V. I. Fediv, S. A. Savchuk, and V. V. Makoviy, “Optical and magneto-optical diagnostics of polymer/nanoparticles colloidal solutions and composites,” Proc. SPIE7388, 73880Z (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. D. Golubchik, E. Polturak, G. Koren, and S. G. Lipson, “A high resolution magneto-optical system for imaging of individual magnetic flux quanta,” Opt. Express17(18), 16160–16165 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. L. Sun, S. Jiang, and J. R. Marciante, “All-fiber optical magnetic-field sensor based on Faraday rotation in highly terbium-doped fiber,” Opt. Express18(6), 5407–5412 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. A. Lopez-Santiago, P. Gangopadhyay, J. Thomas, R. A. Norwood, A. Persoons, and N. Peyghambarian, “Faraday rotation in magnetite-polymethylmethacrylate core-shell nanocomposites with high optical quality,” Appl. Phys. Lett.95(14), 143302 (2009). [CrossRef]
  7. M.-C. Oh, J.-K. Seo, K.-J. Kim, H. Kim, J.-W. Kim, and W.-S. Chu, “Optical Current Sensors Consisting of Polymeric Waveguide Components,” J. Lightwave Technol.28(12), 1851–1857 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. H. Koerner, J. Jacobs, D. Tomlin, J. Busbee, and R. Vaia, “Tuning Polymer Nanocomposite Morphology: AC Electric Field Manipulation of Epoxy–Montmorillonite (Clay) Suspensions,” Adv. Mater.16(4), 297–302 (2004). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Mittal, P. P. Lele, E. W. Kaler, and E. M. Furst, “Polarization and interactions of colloidal particles in ac electric fields,” J. Chem. Phys.129(6), 064513 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. S. K. Apte, S. D. Naik, R. S. Sonawane, B. B. Kale, and J. O. Baeg, “Synthesis of Nanosize-Necked Structure α- and γ-Fe2O3 and its Photocatalytic Activity,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc.90(2), 412–414 (2007). [CrossRef]
  11. A. E. DePrince and R. J. Hinde, “Accurate Computation of Electric Field Enhancement Factors for Metallic Nanoparticles Using the Discrete Dipole Approximation,” Nanoscale Res. Lett.5(3), 592–596 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. J. Park and W. Lu, “Orientation of core-shell nanoparticles in an electric field,” Appl. Phys. Lett.91(5), 053113 (2007). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optics of Waves in Crystals (Wiley, 2003).
  14. Yu. S. Dadoenkova, I. L. Lyubchanskii, Y. P. Lee, and Th. Rasing, “Electric field controlled Faraday rotation in an electro-optic/magneto-optic bilayer,” Appl. Phys. Lett.97(1), 011901 (2010). [CrossRef]
  15. X. J. Li and K. Chang, “Electric-field tuning s-d exchange interaction in quantum dots,” Appl. Phys. Lett.92(7), 071116 (2008). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited