Tm3+/Ho3+ co-doped LiGd(MoO4)2 crystal as laser gain medium around 2.0 μm

doi:10.1364/OME.2.001064

Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LiGd(MoO₄)₂ crystal as laser gain medium around 2.0 μm

Jianfeng Tang, Yujin Chen, Yanfu Lin, Xinghong Gong, Jianhua Huang, Zundu Luo, and Yidong Huang »View Author Affiliations

Optical Materials Express, Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 1064-1075 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OME.2.001064

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2844 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental procedure
3. Results and discussion
4. Conclusion
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (27)
Cited By
Figures (11)
Metrics

Abstract

Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LiGd(MoO₄)₂ (LGM) crystals were investigated as gain media for the Ho³⁺ laser around 2.0 μm. Polarized spectroscopic parameters of Ho³⁺ ions in the crystals were calculated based on the absorption spectra by the Judd-Ofelt theory. Related fluorescence spectra and decay curves were measured and analyzed for the crystals with different Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped concentrations, 5.4/1.4 and 4.6/0.6 at.%. Stimulated emission cross sections of the ⁵I₇→⁵I₈ transition of Ho³⁺ ions were derived according to the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg formula. End-pumped by a pulsed diode laser at 795 nm, the Ho³⁺ laser at 2.05 μm with a slope efficiency of 20% was realized in a c-cut crystal sample with the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ concentrations of 4.6/0.6 at.%.

1. Introduction

Ho³⁺-doped crystals have been widely studied for lasing around 2.0 μm via the ⁵I₇→⁵I₈ transition. The laser is eye-safe and matches well with the absorption lines of H₂O and CO₂. Therefore, a number of applications such as coherent lidar, atmospheric sensing, and surgery are possible [1

S. W. Henderson, P. J. M. Suni, C. P. Hale, S. M. Hannon, J. R. Magee, D. L. Bruns, and E. H. Yuen, “Coherent laser-radar at 2 μm using solid-state lasers,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 31(1), 4–15 (1993). [CrossRef]

–3

B. Walsh, “Review of Tm and Ho materials; spectroscopy and lasers,” Laser Phys. 19(4), 855–866 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Furthermore, the laser operating in ultrafast pulse regime can also be used in time-resolved spectroscopy and as pumping source for the optical parametric oscillator (OPO) in the mid-infrared region [4

A. A. Lagatsky, F. Fusari, S. Calvez, S. V. Kurilchik, V. E. Kisel, N. V. Kuleshov, M. D. Dawson, C. T. A. Brown, and W. Sibbett, “Femtosecond pulse operation of a Tm,Ho-codoped crystalline laser near 2 μm,” Opt. Lett. 35(2), 172–174 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

P. A. Budni, L. A. Pomeranz, M. L. Lemons, C. A. Miller, J. R. Mosto, and E. P. Chicklis, “Efficient mid-infrared laser using 1.9-μm-pumped Ho:YAG and ZnGeP₂ optical parametric oscillators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17(5), 723–728 (2000). [CrossRef]

]. Research of gain media for realizing the pulse laser has recently attracted substantial attentions. Generally, Tm³⁺ or Yb³⁺ ions, which has large absorption cross section at the emitting wavelengths of the commercially available high power laser diodes (LD), is co-doped as sensitizer for improving pump absorption [6

V. Kushawaha, Y. Chen, Y. Yan, and L. Major, “High-efficiency continuous-wave diode-pumped Tm:Ho:LuAG laser at 2.1 μm,” Appl. Phys. B 62(1), 109–111 (1996). [CrossRef]

–9

S. D. Jackson and S. Mossman, “Diode-cladding-pumped Yb³⁺, Ho³⁺-doped silica fiber laser operating at 2.1-μm,” Appl. Opt. 42(18), 3546–3549 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The processes of energy transfers from Tm³⁺ and Yb³⁺ to Ho³⁺ ions are schemed in Fig. 1 . Notably for the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped system, a maximal pump quantum efficiency close to 2 could be expected due to the cross relaxation (CR) of Tm³⁺ ions, ³H₄ + ³H₆→³F₄ + ³F₄.

Fig. 1 Schematic of energy transfer from Tm³⁺ to Ho³⁺ ions and Yb³⁺ to Ho³⁺ ions.

Double tungstate and double molybdate crystals with a general formula of MT(XO₄)₂ (M = Li, Na, or K; T = Y, La, Gd, or Lu; X = W or Mo) have been proved to meet the requirement of hosts for ultrashort pulse laser [4

,10

A. A. Lagatsky, X. Han, M. D. Serrano, C. Cascales, C. Zaldo, S. Calvez, M. D. Dawson, J. A. Gupta, C. T. A. Brown, and W. Sibbett, “Femtosecond (191 fs) NaY(WO₄)₂ Tm,Ho-codoped laser at 2060 nm,” Opt. Lett. 35(18), 3027–3029 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Especially for the subgroup with M = Li or Na, which belongs to the tetragonal system with space group of

I \bar{4}

. Crystals with this structure are usually characterized by a high disordered local environment due to the monovalent alkali ions and trivalent rare earth ions randomly sharing two different S₄ lattice sites labeled as 2b and 2d [11

C. Cascales, A. Méndez-Blas, M. Rico, V. Volkov, and C. Zaldo, “The optical spectroscopy of lanthanides R³⁺ in ABi(XO₄)₂ (A = Li, Na; X = Mo, W) and LiYb(MoO₄)₂ multifunctional single crystals: relationship with the structural local disorder,” Opt. Mater. 27(11), 1672–1680 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. When active ions of rare earths substitute the trivalent cations, inhomogeneous broadening for absorption and emission bands are beneficial to being pumped by LD and generating wide tunable and ultrashort pulse lasers. Recently, a pulse laser operation as short as 191 fs has been realized in a Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped NaY(WO₄)₂ crystal [10

]. Detailed spectroscopic and laser properties of another isostructural Tm³⁺ singly doped LiGd(MoO₄)₂ (LGM) crystal have been reported in our previous work [12

J. Tang, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, X. Gong, J. Huang, Z. Luo, and Y. Huang, “Polarized spectral properties and laser demonstration of Tm³⁺-doped LiGd(MoO₄)₂ crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(9), 1769–1777 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. In this work, Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM crystals are studied as the gain media for Ho³⁺ laser around 2.0 μm. The laser has been realized in a simple plano-concave cavity with a pulsed LD as pumping source.

2. Experimental procedure

Two Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ and one Yb³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM single crystals were grown by the Czochralski method in air at about 1030 °C. After growth the crystals were annealed at about 850 °C for 10 hours to reduce the residual stress. The doping concentrations measured by an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Ultima 2, Jobin-Yvon) are 5.4/1.4 and 4.6/0.6 at.% for the two Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped crystals and 7.7/1.4 at.% for the Yb³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped crystal (hereafter 5.4/1.4 TH, 4.6/0.6 TH and 7.7/1.4 YH for short, respectively). Oriented crystal samples were cut and polished for spectral experiments with dimensions (crystallographic a × b × c) of 2.70 × 10 × 10, 1.88 × 7 × 8, and 2.20 × 5 × 7 mm³, respectively. No gas bubbles or inclusions were found in these samples. The optical quality of the crystals was examined by a ZYGO GPI optical interferometer. The interference fringes are straight and have a uniform distribution which shows the crystals have good optical homogeneity. Figure 2 shows the result for the 4.6/0.6 TH. The polarized absorption spectra were measured using a UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer (Lambda 900, Perkin-Elmer) with a scanning step of 0.5 nm. A deuterium lamp (UV) and a tungsten-halogen lamp (VIS/NIR) were equipped as the light sources. The polarized fluorescence spectra were measured by a TE-cooled PbS detector in the NIR region associated with a monochromator (Triax 550, Jobin-Yvon) ahead of it, a Ti:sapphire laser operating at 795 nm and an InGaAs LD operating at 970 nm were used as exciting sources for the Tm³⁺ and Yb³⁺ ions, respectively, with a measured resolution of 1.0 nm. The fluorescence decay curves were measured by a spectrometer (FLSP920, Edinburgh) with a Hamamatsu R928 PMT and an InSb detectors in the VIS and NIR regions, respectively, a tunable mid-band OPO laser (Vibrant 355II, OPOTEK) with pulse duration of about 5 ns was adopted as the exciting source. In fluorescence experiments front-surface excitation-detection was used to measure fluorescence spectra of the crystal samples in order to minimize the impact of re-absorption. Additionally, the excitation intensity was always kept as low as possible to avoid some possible amplified spontaneous emission. All of the spectral experiments were carried out at room temperature.

Fig. 2 Interference fringes for 4.6/0.6 TH crystal sample.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Absorption and Judd-Ofelt analysis

Absorption spectra of the 7.7/1.4 YH in a range of 350−2200 nm were measured for two different polarizations of σ (E⊥c, E represents the electric field direction of incident light) and π (E//c) and are shown in Fig. 3 . It can be found that the absorption of Ho³⁺ ions exhibits a strong anisotropic behavior. The Yb³⁺ ions have only an intense absorption band around 980 nm and do not influence the absorption of Ho³⁺ ions in other measured spectral region. The Judd-Ofelt (J-O) theory [13

B. R. Judd, “Optical absorption intensities of rare-earth ions,” Phys. Rev. 127(3), 750–761 (1962). [CrossRef]

,14

G. S. Ofelt, “Intensities of crystal spectra of rare-earth ions,” J. Chem. Phys. 37(3), 511–520 (1962). [CrossRef]

] was applied to determine the intermultiplet spontaneous transition rates of Ho³⁺ ions in LGM crystal. The J-O intensity parameters Ω_t (t = 2, 4, 6) were fitted by adopting the six easily distinguishable absorption bands corresponding to the transitions from the ground ⁵I₈ multiplet to the excited ⁵I₇, ⁵I₆, ⁵F₅, ⁵F₄ + ⁵S₂, ⁵F₁ + ⁵G₆, and ³G₅ multiplets. The calculation procedure can be found in the literature [15

B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, and B. Di Bartolo, “Branching ratios, cross sections, and radiative lifetimes of rare earth ions in solids: application to Tm³⁺ and Ho³⁺ ions in LiYF₄,” J. Appl. Phys. 83(5), 2772–2787 (1998). [CrossRef]

,16

W. Guo, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Z. Luo, X. Gong, and Y. Huang, “Spectroscopic properties and laser performance of Tm³⁺-doped NaLa(MoO₄)₂ crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103(9), 093106 (2008). [CrossRef]

] and the refractive index has been estimated in [17

A. A. Kaminskii, A. A. Mayer, N. S. Nikonova, M. V. Provotorov, and S. E. Sarkisov, “Stimulated emission from the new LiGd(MoO₄)₂:Nd³⁺ crystal laser,” Phys. Status Solidi A 12(2), K73–K75 (1972). [CrossRef]

]. The contribution of the magnetic dipole (MD) transition of ⁵I₈→⁵I₇ was excluded before the calculation. The values of the reduced matrix elements of unit tensor operators and the coefficients of the intermediate coupling wavefunctions were taken from [18

M. J. Weber, B. H. Matsinger, V. L. Donlan, and G. T. Surratt, “Optical transition probabilities for trivalent holmium in LaF₃ and YAlO₃,” J. Chem. Phys. 57(1), 562–567 (1972). [CrossRef]

] and [19

K. Rajnak and W. F. Krupke, “Energy levels of Ho³⁺ in LaCl₃,” J. Chem. Phys. 46(9), 3532–3542 (1967). [CrossRef]

], respectively. The mean wavelength (

\bar{λ}

), the experimental oscillator strength (

f_{ED}^{exp}

), and the oscillator strength calculated from the J-O intensity parameters (

f_{ED}^{calc}

) for each band are listed in Table 1 . The root mean square (rms) deviations between the experimental and calculated oscillator strengths are 0.95 × 10⁻⁶ and 2.42 × 10⁻⁶ for σ and π polarizations, respectively. Both are in the typical error range of the J-O fitting [20

A. Méndez-Blas, M. Rico, V. Volkov, C. Zaldo, and C. Cascales, “Crystal field analysis and emission cross sections of Ho³⁺ in the locally disordered single-crystal laser hosts M⁺Bi(XO₄)₂ (M⁺ = Li,Na; X = W, Mo),” Phys. Rev. B 75(17), 174208 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. The intensity parameters for Ho³⁺ ions in LGM crystal are listed in Table 2 and the effective J-O intensity parameters were calculated according to

Ω_{t}^{eff} = (2 Ω_{t}^{σ} + Ω_{t}^{π}) / 3

. These parameters are comparable to those of Ho³⁺ in KGd(WO₄)₂ crystal [21

M. C. Pujol, J. Massons, M. Aguiló, F. Díaz, M. Rico, and C. Zaldo, “Emission cross sections and spectroscopy of Ho³⁺ laser channels in KGd(WO₄)₂ single crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 38(1), 93–100 (2002). [CrossRef]

Fig. 3 Polarized absorption spectra of 7.7/1.4 YH crystal in a range of 350−2200 nm.

Table 1 Mean wavelengths and experimental and calculated absorption oscillator strengths for ED transitions of Ho³⁺ in LGM crystal

⁵I₈→	σ polarization			π polarization
	$\bar{λ}$  (nm)	$f_{ED}^{exp}$  (10⁻⁶)	$f_{ED}^{calc}$  (10⁻⁶)	$\bar{λ}$  (nm)	$f_{ED}^{exp}$  (10⁻⁶)	$f_{ED}^{calc}$  (10⁻⁶)
⁵I₇	1978	1.50	1.78	1990	2.19	2.77
⁵I₆	1166	1.28	1.21	1176	1.61	1.86
⁵F₅	650	4.84	4.74	647	10.95	9.57
⁵F₄ + ⁵S₂	538	6.37	4.90	544	11.77	8.94
⁵G₆ + ⁵F₁	454	89.73	89.71	451	96.30	96.25
³G₅	419	6.01	6.70	420	11.92	14.61
Rms Δf_ED		0.95 × 10⁻⁶			2.42 × 10⁻⁶

Table 2 J-O intensity parameters of Ho³⁺ in LGM crystal (in unit of 10⁻²⁰ cm²)

Intensity parameter	σ polarization	π polarization	Effective
Ω₂	19.38	17.94	18.90
Ω₄	4.30	9.39	5.99
Ω₆	1.20	1.84	1.41

The intermultiplet electric dipole (ED) spontaneous transition rates (

A_{ED}^{q}

) of Ho³⁺ were calculated from the intensity parameters for both polarizations (q = σ and π) and are listed in Table 3 . Taking the MD transition rates (

A_{MD}^{}

) into account, the average spontaneous transition rates could be calculated by

A = (2 A^{σ} + A^{π}) / 3

with

A^{q} = A_{ED}^{q} + A_{MD}^{q}

. Then the fluorescence branching ratios (β) and the radiative lifetimes (

τ_{r}

) could be further calculated and the results are also listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Spontaneous transition rates, fluorescence branching ratios, and radiative lifetimes of Ho³⁺ in LGM crystal

Transition		${\bar{λ}}_{EM}$  (nm)	$A_{MD}$  (s⁻¹)	$A_{ED}^{σ}$  (s⁻¹)	$A_{ED}^{π}$  (s⁻¹)	A (s⁻¹)	β (%)	$τ_{r}$  (μs)
⁵F₄→	⁵S₂	80645		~0	~0	~0	~0	83
	⁵F₅	3271	6	70	73	77	0.6
	⁵I₄	1918		34	58	42	0.4
	⁵I₅	1376		260	478	333	2.8
	⁵I₆	1018		742	1532	1005	8.4
	⁵I₇	751		1236	2667	1713	14.3
	⁵I₈	545		6810	12884	8835	73.6
⁵S₂→	⁵F₅	3410		1	3	2	0.1	255
	⁵I₄	1965		67	111	82	2.1
	⁵I₅	1400		56	91	68	1.7
	⁵I₆	1032		262	458	327	8.4
	⁵I₇	758		1189	1825	1401	37.7
	⁵I₈	549		1734	2662	2043	52.1
⁵F₅→	⁵I₄	4636		~0	~0	~0	~0	132
	⁵I₅	2376		16	24	19	0.3
	⁵I₆	1479		195	332	241	3.2
	⁵I₇	975		1180	2180	1514	20.1
	⁵I₈	654		4321	8681	5774	76.5
⁵I₄→	⁵I₅	4873	5	11	17	18	10.5	5774
	⁵I₆	2172		55	87	66	37.9
	⁵I₇	1235		63	99	75	43.3
	⁵I₈	762		12	19	14	8.3
⁵I₅→	⁵I₆	3919	11	18	27	32	10.5	3229
	⁵I₇	1655		128	200	152	49.2
	⁵I₈	903		101	173	125	40.3
⁵I₆→	⁵I₇	2865	22	40	61	69	17	2430
	⁵I₈	1173		290	448	343	83.3
⁵I₇→	⁵I₈	1988	38	129	202	191	100	5236

The polarized absorption spectra were also measured for the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM crystals in a range of 750−850 nm. Since the absorption cross sections corresponding to the ³H₆→³H₄ transition of Tm³⁺ ions are nearly identical for both 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH, only the spectra of the latter are shown in Fig. 4 for brevity. The peak absorption cross sections were 4.66 × 10⁻²⁰ cm² for σ polarization at 795 nm and 1.93 × 10⁻²⁰ cm² for π polarization at 781 nm, with band widths of 8 and 37 nm, respectively. Both the peak values are slightly larger than those of the Tm³⁺ singly doped LGM, respectively [12

]. Taking into account the typical wavelength drift with temperature is about 0.3 nm/K and the spectral bandwidth is 3 to 6 nm for commercial LD pumping source, the stronger absorption of Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM in σ polarization should be ideal for LD pumping.

Fig. 4 Polarized absorption spectra of 4.6/0.6 TH crystal in a range of 750–850 nm.

3.2 Fluorescence and stimulated emission cross sections

When the Yb³⁺ ions were excited to the ²F_5/2 multiplet at 970 nm, the polarized fluorescence spectra of 7.7/1.4 YH around 2.0 μm were measured and are shown in Fig. 5(a) . The emission bands in the range of 1900−2100 nm with peaks around 2050 nm are attributed to the ⁵I₇→⁵I₈ transition of Ho³⁺ ions. Under excitation at 795 nm, the Tm³⁺ ions were excited to the ³H₄ multiplet and the polarized fluorescence spectra of both 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH were measured and are shown in Figs. 5(b) and 5(c), respectively. The emission bands of Tm³⁺ ions corresponding to the transition of ³F₄→³H₆ can still be found in the range of 1650−1950 nm, which suggests that the energy transfer from Tm³⁺ to Ho³⁺ is not complete. Furthermore, the ratio of the integrated fluorescence intensity of Ho³⁺ ions to that of both Tm³⁺ and Ho³⁺ ions, i.e.,

\int_{{Ho}^{3 +}} I (λ) d λ / \int_{{Tm}^{3 +} {+Ho}^{3 +}} I (λ) d λ

, in the entire emission band of 1650−2100 nm in one co-doped crystal, can be used as a measure for the net energy transfer efficiency from Tm³⁺ to Ho³⁺. The ratio in 5.4/1.4 TH is larger compared with that for 4.6/0.6 TH just indicates a preferred energy distribution on Ho³⁺ ions in the higher co-doped case.

Fig. 5 Polarized fluorescence spectra of 7.7/1.4 YH (a) under excitation at 970 nm; 5.4/1.4 TH (b) and 4.6/0.6 TH (c) under excitation at 795 nm.

The fluorescence decay curves for the ³H₄ multiplet of Tm³⁺ ions were measured for both 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH and are shown in Fig. 6 in semi-log scale. The exciting and monitoring wavelengths were 783 and 810 nm, respectively. Both decay curves display a departure from the single exponential behavior. The mean fluorescence lifetimes are estimated 18 and 28 μs for 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH, respectively, according to

τ_{f} = \int_{0}^{\infty} t I (t) d t / \int_{0}^{\infty} I (t) d t

where

I (t)

is the fluorescence intensity at time t [22

G. C. Righini and M. Ferrari, “Photoluminescence of rare-earth-doped glasses,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 28, 1–53 (2005).

]. Since an intrinsic lifetime τ₀ = 134 μs for the ³H₄ multiplet has been reported in a 0.79 at.% Tm³⁺ singly doped LGM crystal [12

], the energy transfer efficiency (η) for Tm³⁺ ions on the ³H₄ multiplet were estimated 87% and 79% for 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH, respectively, by

η = 1 - τ_{f} / τ_{0}

and the energy transfer should be firstly attributed to the cross relaxation (³H₄ + ³H₆→³F₄ + ³F₄) between Tm³⁺ ions.

Fig. 6 Fluorescence decay curves for the ³H₄ multiplet of Tm³⁺ ions for 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH. The exciting and monitoring wavelengths are 783 and 810 nm, respectively.

The fluorescence decay curves for the ³F₄ multiplet of Tm³⁺ ions and the ⁵I₇ multiplet of Ho³⁺ ions were also measured for the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM crystals and are shown in Fig. 7 . The exciting and monitoring wavelengths were 1700 (2000) nm and 1750 (2050) nm for the ³F₄ (⁵I₇) multiplet of Tm³⁺ (Ho³⁺) ions, respectively. Similar kinetic behaviors can be found for both the 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH. Notably for the curves of Tm³⁺ ions, a sharp decay in the early time was recorded responsible for the fast energy transfer of ³F₄(Tm³⁺) + ⁵I₈(Ho³⁺)→³H₆(Tm³⁺) + ⁵I₇(Ho³⁺). Since the energy transfer is nearly resonant and always accompanied by its inverse process of ⁵I₇(Ho³⁺) + ³H₆(Tm³⁺)→⁵I₈(Ho³⁺) + ³F₄(Tm³⁺), the two multiplets, ³F₄ and ⁵I₇, will share their excitations and be rapidly coupled into an equilibrium system after excitation [23

B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, and B. D. Bartolo, “The temperature dependence of energy transfer between the Tm ³F₄ and Ho ⁵I₇ manifolds of Tm-sensitized Ho luminescence in YAG and YLF,” J. Lumin. 90(1-2), 39–48 (2000). [CrossRef]

]. Therefore, the decay rates of both the Tm³⁺ and Ho³⁺ ions become nearly identical in the late decay period. The mean fluorescence lifetimes were estimated 3.9 ms for the ³F₄ multiplet and 4.2 ms for the ⁵I₇ multiplet in 5.4/1.4 TH and 2.1 and 2.3 ms in 4.6/0.6 TH, respectively. By the way, the fluorescence decay curve for the ⁵I₇ multiplet of Ho³⁺ ions was also measured from the 7.7/1.4 YH and is shown in Fig. 8 . The lifetime fitted from the single exponential decay curve is 4.9 ms which is longer than the above Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped systems. Meanwhile, the fluorescence lifetime for the ³F₄ multiplet of Tm³⁺ ions was previously reported about 1 ms in Tm³⁺ singly doped LGM crystals [12

], the distinct coupled decay behaviors for the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped systems just embodies the energy transfers between Tm³⁺ and Ho³⁺ ions. The coupled lifetimes are closely related to the doping concentrations, especially, related to the ratio of Tm³⁺ to Ho³⁺ concentrations [24

T. Y. Fan, G. Huber, R. L. Byer, and P. Mitzscherlich, “Spectroscopy and diode laser-pumped operation of Tm, Ho-YAG,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24(6), 924–933 (1988). [CrossRef]

].The stimulated emission cross section (

σ_{EM}^{q}

) for the ⁵I₇→⁵I₈ transition of Ho³⁺ ions is an important factor related to the 2.0 μm laser operation. According to the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg (F-L) formula [25

Z. Luo, Y. Huang, and X. Chen, Spectroscopy of Solid-State Laser and Luminescent Materials (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2007).

]

σ_{EM}^{q} (λ) = \frac{A^{q} λ^{5} I_{q} (λ)}{8 π c n_{q}^{2} \int λ I_{q} (λ) d λ},

(1)

where

A^{q}

is the spontaneous transition rate,

I_{q} (λ)

is the fluorescence intensity at wavelength λ, c is the speed of light. The polarized stimulated emission cross sections versus wavelength were derived from the fluorescence spectra of the 7.7/1.4 YH and are shown in Fig. 9 . The maximum emission cross sections are 0.75 × 10⁻²⁰ cm² at 2050 nm for σ polarization and 1.67 × 10⁻²⁰ cm² at 2045 nm for π polarization.

Fig. 7 Fluorescence decay curves for the ³F₄ (⁵I₇) multiplet of Tm³⁺ (Ho³⁺) ions for 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH. The exciting and monitoring wavelengths are 1700 (2000) and 1750 (2050) nm, respectively.

Fig. 8 Fluorescence decay curve for the ⁵I₇ multiplet of Ho³⁺ ions for 7.7/1.4 YH. The exciting and monitoring wavelengths are 2000 and 2050 nm, respectively.

Fig. 9 Polarized emission cross sections for the ⁵I₇→⁵I₈ transition of Ho³⁺ ions derived by the F-L formula. The corresponding absorption cross sections for ⁵I₈→⁵I₇ transition are also plotted for comparison.

Using the absorption and emission cross sections derived above, the wavelength dependence of the gain cross sections can be calculated by [26

K. Ohta, H. Saito, and M. Obara, “Spectroscopic characterization of Tm³⁺-YVO₄ crystal as an efficient diode pumped laser source near 2000-nm,” J. Appl. Phys. 73(7), 3149–3152 (1993). [CrossRef]

]

σ_{G}^{q} (λ) = P σ_{EM}^{q} (λ) - (1 - P) σ_{GSA}^{q} (λ) .

(2)

where P represents the population inversion defined as the ratio of the Ho³⁺ ions at the ⁵I₇ multiplet to those at both the ⁵I₇ and ⁵I₈ multiplets,

σ_{GSA}^{q}

is the absorption cross section. Figure 10 shows the calculated gain cross sections for several values of P (P = 0.3, 0.4, …, 0.7) for both polarizations. To take the P = 0.5 for an example, it can be seen that the gain for π polarization is larger than that for σ polarization and the theoretical tunable range of Ho³⁺ laser covers from 1975 to 2100 nm.

Fig. 10 Polarized gain cross sections for ⁵I₇→⁵I₈ transition of Ho³⁺ ions in LGM crystal with different values of population inversion P (P = 0.3, 0.4, …, 0.7).

3.3 Laser demonstration

In order to assess the laser performance of the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM, an end-pumped plano-concave resonator was adopted with a fiber-coupled pulsed LD emitting at 795 nm as the pumping source. The pump beam was modulated with a duty cycle of 2% and a modulation frequency of 10 Hz. It passed through an input coupler which had a 90% transmission at 795 nm and a reflectivity of R > 99% in the region between 1900 and 2100 nm. The crystal sample, without any antireflection coating, was held in an aluminum mount and positioned to the input coupler as close as possible. The diameter of pump beam inside the gain medium was about 115 μm. Three output couplers with transmissions T_OC = 0.7%, 2.4%, and 3.9% around 2.0 μm and the same curvature radius of 100 mm were adopted in the experiment, respectively. The length of the plano-concave cavity was set close to the curvature radius of the output couplers.

Taking into account the polarization-dependent absorption of the Tm³⁺ ions at the pump wavelength, the c-cut Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM crystal samples with dimensions (a × b × c) of 7 × 10 × 0.87 and 7 × 7 × 1.10 mm for 5.4/1.4 TH and 4.6/0.6 TH were used as laser gain media, respectively. However, the Ho³⁺ laser was only realized in the 4.6/0.6 TH with lasing wavelength at 2.05 μm. Within a low-power pump, the single-path pump absorption efficiency was measured about 80% which is in agreement with the calculated 79% from absorption cross section. The absorption efficiency was almost kept the same in our experiment. Figure 11 shows the average output power versus the average absorbed pump power at different output coupler transmissions, the laser operated at a relative low-power level. The maximum output power of 25 mW was achieved when the absorbed pump power was 138 mW for the T_OC = 3.9%. The related slope efficiency (η_S) was about 20%. Moreover, it can be found that, since the slope efficiency has monotonically increased from 10% to 20% with the increment of T_OC from 0.7% to 3.9%, a higher efficient laser can be expected by optimizing the output coupler transmission.

Fig. 11 Average output power versus average absorbed pump power for a c-cut 4.6/0.6 TH laser at different output coupler transmissions.

The Ho³⁺ laser around 2.0 μm operating at room temperature is a quasi-three-level system. The reason for the lack of laser demonstration in the higher co-doped 5.4/1.4 TH sample may be mainly attributed to the stronger re-absorption loss.

4. Conclusion

A detailed description of the spectroscopic properties for the Ho³⁺ ions in LGM crystals was performed. Comparative study on the spectroscopic properties related to the 2.0 μm laser of Ho³⁺ has been carried out for the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM crystals with concentrations of 5.4/1.4 and 4.6/0.6 at.%. Although the fluorescence spectra suggest that a more efficient energy transfer from Tm³⁺ to Ho³⁺ ions has occurred in the 5.4/1.4 TH, laser operation has been realized only in the 4.6/0.6 TH. The main reason for the lack of laser operation in the higher co-doped sample should be attributed to the stronger re-absorption loss as the Ho³⁺ concentration is more than twice as high in the lower co-doped case.

A 2.05 μm Ho³⁺ laser has been realized in a 1.10-mm-thick c-cut 4.6/0.6 TH sample with a fiber-coupled pulsed LD end-pumped at 795 nm. The slope efficiency of 20% was achieved at the output coupler transmission of 3.9% and the maximum average output power was 25 mW when the absorbed pump power was 138 mW. Since a continuous wave Ho³⁺ laser with slope efficiency as high as 48% has been realized in another isostructural 5/0.25 at.% Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped NaY(WO₄)₂ crystal when a V-type astigmatically-compensated resonator has been adopted [27

X. Han, F. Fusari, M. D. Serrano, A. A. Lagatsky, J. M. Cano-Torres, C. T. A. Brown, C. Zaldo, and W. Sibbett, “Continuous-wave laser operation of Tm and Hoco-doped NaY(WO₄)₂ and NaLu(WO₄)₂ crystals,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5413–5419 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], a better result can be expected for the Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LGM crystal by further optimizing the concentrations of Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ ions and configuration of laser cavity.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 50972142), the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant KJCX2-EW-H03-01), and the Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Optoelectronic Crystalline Materials.

References and links

1.	S. W. Henderson, P. J. M. Suni, C. P. Hale, S. M. Hannon, J. R. Magee, D. L. Bruns, and E. H. Yuen, “Coherent laser-radar at 2 μm using solid-state lasers,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 31(1), 4–15 (1993). [CrossRef]
2.	R. M. Mihalcea, M. E. Webber, D. S. Baer, R. K. Hanson, G. S. Feller, and W. B. Chapman, “Diode-laser absorption measurements of CO₂, H₂O, N₂O, and NH₃ near 2.0 μm,” Appl. Phys. B 67(3), 283–288 (1998). [CrossRef]
3.	B. Walsh, “Review of Tm and Ho materials; spectroscopy and lasers,” Laser Phys. 19(4), 855–866 (2009). [CrossRef]
4.	A. A. Lagatsky, F. Fusari, S. Calvez, S. V. Kurilchik, V. E. Kisel, N. V. Kuleshov, M. D. Dawson, C. T. A. Brown, and W. Sibbett, “Femtosecond pulse operation of a Tm,Ho-codoped crystalline laser near 2 μm,” Opt. Lett. 35(2), 172–174 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.	P. A. Budni, L. A. Pomeranz, M. L. Lemons, C. A. Miller, J. R. Mosto, and E. P. Chicklis, “Efficient mid-infrared laser using 1.9-μm-pumped Ho:YAG and ZnGeP₂ optical parametric oscillators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17(5), 723–728 (2000). [CrossRef]
6.	V. Kushawaha, Y. Chen, Y. Yan, and L. Major, “High-efficiency continuous-wave diode-pumped Tm:Ho:LuAG laser at 2.1 μm,” Appl. Phys. B 62(1), 109–111 (1996). [CrossRef]
7.	G. Rustad and K. Stenersen, “Low threshold laser-diode side-pumped Tm:YAG and Tm:Ho:YAG lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 3(1), 82–89 (1997). [CrossRef]
8.	A. Diening, B.-M. Dicks, E. Heumann, R. Groß, and G. Huber, “970 nm diode pumped Yb, Tm and Yb,Ho:YAG laser in the 2 μm spectral region,” in Advanced Solid State Lasers, C. R. Pollock and W. R. Bosenberg, eds., Vol. 10 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1997), pp. 202–204.
9.	S. D. Jackson and S. Mossman, “Diode-cladding-pumped Yb³⁺, Ho³⁺-doped silica fiber laser operating at 2.1-μm,” Appl. Opt. 42(18), 3546–3549 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.	A. A. Lagatsky, X. Han, M. D. Serrano, C. Cascales, C. Zaldo, S. Calvez, M. D. Dawson, J. A. Gupta, C. T. A. Brown, and W. Sibbett, “Femtosecond (191 fs) NaY(WO₄)₂ Tm,Ho-codoped laser at 2060 nm,” Opt. Lett. 35(18), 3027–3029 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.	C. Cascales, A. Méndez-Blas, M. Rico, V. Volkov, and C. Zaldo, “The optical spectroscopy of lanthanides R³⁺ in ABi(XO₄)₂ (A = Li, Na; X = Mo, W) and LiYb(MoO₄)₂ multifunctional single crystals: relationship with the structural local disorder,” Opt. Mater. 27(11), 1672–1680 (2005). [CrossRef]
12.	J. Tang, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, X. Gong, J. Huang, Z. Luo, and Y. Huang, “Polarized spectral properties and laser demonstration of Tm³⁺-doped LiGd(MoO₄)₂ crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27(9), 1769–1777 (2010). [CrossRef]
13.	B. R. Judd, “Optical absorption intensities of rare-earth ions,” Phys. Rev. 127(3), 750–761 (1962). [CrossRef]
14.	G. S. Ofelt, “Intensities of crystal spectra of rare-earth ions,” J. Chem. Phys. 37(3), 511–520 (1962). [CrossRef]
15.	B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, and B. Di Bartolo, “Branching ratios, cross sections, and radiative lifetimes of rare earth ions in solids: application to Tm³⁺ and Ho³⁺ ions in LiYF₄,” J. Appl. Phys. 83(5), 2772–2787 (1998). [CrossRef]
16.	W. Guo, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Z. Luo, X. Gong, and Y. Huang, “Spectroscopic properties and laser performance of Tm³⁺-doped NaLa(MoO₄)₂ crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103(9), 093106 (2008). [CrossRef]
17.	A. A. Kaminskii, A. A. Mayer, N. S. Nikonova, M. V. Provotorov, and S. E. Sarkisov, “Stimulated emission from the new LiGd(MoO₄)₂:Nd³⁺ crystal laser,” Phys. Status Solidi A 12(2), K73–K75 (1972). [CrossRef]
18.	M. J. Weber, B. H. Matsinger, V. L. Donlan, and G. T. Surratt, “Optical transition probabilities for trivalent holmium in LaF₃ and YAlO₃,” J. Chem. Phys. 57(1), 562–567 (1972). [CrossRef]
19.	K. Rajnak and W. F. Krupke, “Energy levels of Ho³⁺ in LaCl₃,” J. Chem. Phys. 46(9), 3532–3542 (1967). [CrossRef]
20.	A. Méndez-Blas, M. Rico, V. Volkov, C. Zaldo, and C. Cascales, “Crystal field analysis and emission cross sections of Ho³⁺ in the locally disordered single-crystal laser hosts M⁺Bi(XO₄)₂ (M⁺ = Li,Na; X = W, Mo),” Phys. Rev. B 75(17), 174208 (2007). [CrossRef]
21.	M. C. Pujol, J. Massons, M. Aguiló, F. Díaz, M. Rico, and C. Zaldo, “Emission cross sections and spectroscopy of Ho³⁺ laser channels in KGd(WO₄)₂ single crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 38(1), 93–100 (2002). [CrossRef]
22.	G. C. Righini and M. Ferrari, “Photoluminescence of rare-earth-doped glasses,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 28, 1–53 (2005).
23.	B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, and B. D. Bartolo, “The temperature dependence of energy transfer between the Tm ³F₄ and Ho ⁵I₇ manifolds of Tm-sensitized Ho luminescence in YAG and YLF,” J. Lumin. 90(1-2), 39–48 (2000). [CrossRef]
24.	T. Y. Fan, G. Huber, R. L. Byer, and P. Mitzscherlich, “Spectroscopy and diode laser-pumped operation of Tm, Ho-YAG,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24(6), 924–933 (1988). [CrossRef]
25.	Z. Luo, Y. Huang, and X. Chen, Spectroscopy of Solid-State Laser and Luminescent Materials (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2007).
26.	K. Ohta, H. Saito, and M. Obara, “Spectroscopic characterization of Tm³⁺-YVO₄ crystal as an efficient diode pumped laser source near 2000-nm,” J. Appl. Phys. 73(7), 3149–3152 (1993). [CrossRef]
27.	X. Han, F. Fusari, M. D. Serrano, A. A. Lagatsky, J. M. Cano-Torres, C. T. A. Brown, C. Zaldo, and W. Sibbett, “Continuous-wave laser operation of Tm and Hoco-doped NaY(WO₄)₂ and NaLu(WO₄)₂ crystals,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5413–5419 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(140.3380) Lasers and laser optics : Laser materials
(140.3580) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, solid-state
(160.5690) Materials : Rare-earth-doped materials

ToC Category:
Laser Materials

History
Original Manuscript: February 9, 2012
Revised Manuscript: June 5, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: July 16, 2012
Published: July 18, 2012

Citation
Jianfeng Tang, Yujin Chen, Yanfu Lin, Xinghong Gong, Jianhua Huang, Zundu Luo, and Yidong Huang, "Tm³⁺/Ho³⁺ co-doped LiGd(MoO₄)₂ crystal as laser gain medium around 2.0 μm," Opt. Mater. Express 2, 1064-1075 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ome/abstract.cfm?URI=ome-2-8-1064

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

S. W. Henderson, P. J. M. Suni, C. P. Hale, S. M. Hannon, J. R. Magee, D. L. Bruns, and E. H. Yuen, “Coherent laser-radar at 2 μm using solid-state lasers,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens.31(1), 4–15 (1993). [CrossRef]
R. M. Mihalcea, M. E. Webber, D. S. Baer, R. K. Hanson, G. S. Feller, and W. B. Chapman, “Diode-laser absorption measurements of CO2, H2O, N2O, and NH3 near 2.0 μm,” Appl. Phys. B67(3), 283–288 (1998). [CrossRef]
B. Walsh, “Review of Tm and Ho materials; spectroscopy and lasers,” Laser Phys.19(4), 855–866 (2009). [CrossRef]
A. A. Lagatsky, F. Fusari, S. Calvez, S. V. Kurilchik, V. E. Kisel, N. V. Kuleshov, M. D. Dawson, C. T. A. Brown, and W. Sibbett, “Femtosecond pulse operation of a Tm,Ho-codoped crystalline laser near 2 μm,” Opt. Lett.35(2), 172–174 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. A. Budni, L. A. Pomeranz, M. L. Lemons, C. A. Miller, J. R. Mosto, and E. P. Chicklis, “Efficient mid-infrared laser using 1.9-μm-pumped Ho:YAG and ZnGeP2 optical parametric oscillators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B17(5), 723–728 (2000). [CrossRef]
V. Kushawaha, Y. Chen, Y. Yan, and L. Major, “High-efficiency continuous-wave diode-pumped Tm:Ho:LuAG laser at 2.1 μm,” Appl. Phys. B62(1), 109–111 (1996). [CrossRef]
G. Rustad and K. Stenersen, “Low threshold laser-diode side-pumped Tm:YAG and Tm:Ho:YAG lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.3(1), 82–89 (1997). [CrossRef]
A. Diening, B.-M. Dicks, E. Heumann, R. Groß, and G. Huber, “970 nm diode pumped Yb, Tm and Yb,Ho:YAG laser in the 2 μm spectral region,” in Advanced Solid State Lasers, C. R. Pollock and W. R. Bosenberg, eds., Vol. 10 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1997), pp. 202–204.
S. D. Jackson and S. Mossman, “Diode-cladding-pumped Yb3+, Ho3+-doped silica fiber laser operating at 2.1-μm,” Appl. Opt.42(18), 3546–3549 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. A. Lagatsky, X. Han, M. D. Serrano, C. Cascales, C. Zaldo, S. Calvez, M. D. Dawson, J. A. Gupta, C. T. A. Brown, and W. Sibbett, “Femtosecond (191 fs) NaY(WO4)2 Tm,Ho-codoped laser at 2060 nm,” Opt. Lett.35(18), 3027–3029 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Cascales, A. Méndez-Blas, M. Rico, V. Volkov, and C. Zaldo, “The optical spectroscopy of lanthanides R3+ in ABi(XO4)2 (A = Li, Na; X = Mo, W) and LiYb(MoO4)2 multifunctional single crystals: relationship with the structural local disorder,” Opt. Mater.27(11), 1672–1680 (2005). [CrossRef]
J. Tang, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, X. Gong, J. Huang, Z. Luo, and Y. Huang, “Polarized spectral properties and laser demonstration of Tm3+-doped LiGd(MoO4)2 crystal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B27(9), 1769–1777 (2010). [CrossRef]
B. R. Judd, “Optical absorption intensities of rare-earth ions,” Phys. Rev.127(3), 750–761 (1962). [CrossRef]
G. S. Ofelt, “Intensities of crystal spectra of rare-earth ions,” J. Chem. Phys.37(3), 511–520 (1962). [CrossRef]
B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, and B. Di Bartolo, “Branching ratios, cross sections, and radiative lifetimes of rare earth ions in solids: application to Tm3+ and Ho3+ ions in LiYF4,” J. Appl. Phys.83(5), 2772–2787 (1998). [CrossRef]
W. Guo, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Z. Luo, X. Gong, and Y. Huang, “Spectroscopic properties and laser performance of Tm3+-doped NaLa(MoO4)2 crystal,” J. Appl. Phys.103(9), 093106 (2008). [CrossRef]
A. A. Kaminskii, A. A. Mayer, N. S. Nikonova, M. V. Provotorov, and S. E. Sarkisov, “Stimulated emission from the new LiGd(MoO4)2:Nd3+ crystal laser,” Phys. Status Solidi A12(2), K73–K75 (1972). [CrossRef]
M. J. Weber, B. H. Matsinger, V. L. Donlan, and G. T. Surratt, “Optical transition probabilities for trivalent holmium in LaF3 and YAlO3,” J. Chem. Phys.57(1), 562–567 (1972). [CrossRef]
K. Rajnak and W. F. Krupke, “Energy levels of Ho3+ in LaCl3,” J. Chem. Phys.46(9), 3532–3542 (1967). [CrossRef]
A. Méndez-Blas, M. Rico, V. Volkov, C. Zaldo, and C. Cascales, “Crystal field analysis and emission cross sections of Ho3+ in the locally disordered single-crystal laser hosts M+Bi(XO4)2 (M+ = Li,Na; X = W, Mo),” Phys. Rev. B75(17), 174208 (2007). [CrossRef]
M. C. Pujol, J. Massons, M. Aguiló, F. Díaz, M. Rico, and C. Zaldo, “Emission cross sections and spectroscopy of Ho3+ laser channels in KGd(WO4)2 single crystal,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.38(1), 93–100 (2002). [CrossRef]
G. C. Righini and M. Ferrari, “Photoluminescence of rare-earth-doped glasses,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.28, 1–53 (2005).
B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, and B. D. Bartolo, “The temperature dependence of energy transfer between the Tm 3F4 and Ho 5I7 manifolds of Tm-sensitized Ho luminescence in YAG and YLF,” J. Lumin.90(1-2), 39–48 (2000). [CrossRef]
T. Y. Fan, G. Huber, R. L. Byer, and P. Mitzscherlich, “Spectroscopy and diode laser-pumped operation of Tm, Ho-YAG,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.24(6), 924–933 (1988). [CrossRef]
Z. Luo, Y. Huang, and X. Chen, Spectroscopy of Solid-State Laser and Luminescent Materials (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2007).
K. Ohta, H. Saito, and M. Obara, “Spectroscopic characterization of Tm3+-YVO4 crystal as an efficient diode pumped laser source near 2000-nm,” J. Appl. Phys.73(7), 3149–3152 (1993). [CrossRef]
X. Han, F. Fusari, M. D. Serrano, A. A. Lagatsky, J. M. Cano-Torres, C. T. A. Brown, C. Zaldo, and W. Sibbett, “Continuous-wave laser operation of Tm and Hoco-doped NaY(WO4)2 and NaLu(WO4)2 crystals,” Opt. Express18(6), 5413–5419 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper