OSA's Digital Library

Optical Materials Express

Optical Materials Express

  • Editor: David J. Hagan
  • Vol. 3, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2013
  • pp: 184–193
« Show journal navigation

Magnetic and magneto-optical quenching in (Mn2+, Sr2+) metaphosphate glasses

A. Winterstein, H. Akamatsu, D. Möncke, K. Tanaka, M. A. Schmidt, and L. Wondraczek  »View Author Affiliations


Optical Materials Express, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 184-193 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OME.3.000184


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1654 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Transition metal ions such as Mn2+, Fe2+, or Co2+ provide an interesting alternative to rare earth dopants in optically active glasses. In terms of their magneto-optical properties, they are not yet very well exploited. Here, we report on the effect of Mn2+ on Faraday rotation in a metaphosphate glass matrix along the join MnxSr1-x(PO3)2 with x = 0...1. Mn2+ shows small optical extinction in the visible spectral range and, compared to other transition metal ions, a high effective magnetic moment. At high Mn- levels, however, the magneto-optical activity of Mn2+ is strongly quenched due to ionic clustering. The magnetic properties of the heavily Mn2+-loaded phosphate matrix are dominated by a superexchange interaction in the Mn2+-O-Mn2+ bridge with antiparallel spin alignment between Mn2+ and O2- species. The apparent paramagnetic potential of Mn2+ species can therefore not be exploited at room temperature.

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

Magneto-optics utilize the Faraday effect, by which the plane of linearly polarized light is rotated as the light propagates through a magneto-optical (MO) medium which is exposed to a longitudinal magnetic field. The angle of polarization rotation (denoted Faraday angle) is proportional to the magnetic field strength, the medium length and the Verdet constant V which is a material parameter. By definition, V is positive for diamagnetic and negative for paramagnetic or antiferromagnetic materials. Most glasses are weakly diamagnetic [1

1. J. Qiu and K. Hirao, “The Faraday effect in diamagnetic glasses,” J. Magn. Reson. 13(05), 1358–1362 (1998).

]. However, if strongly paramagnetic ions are incorporated in sufficiently high concentration into a weakly diamagnetic matrix, a significant Faraday rotation can be achieved. The governing factor in this process is the magnetic susceptibility, χ, of the dopant. The value of χ depends strongly on the employed active species and may range from ~101 for typical diamagnetic species, to ~103 for transition metal (TM) ions up to ~104 for rare earth (RE) ions [2

2. Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology New Series, III/19, Subvolumes a to i2, Magnetic Properties of Metals (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1986–1992).

4

4. Tables de Constantes et Données Numérique, Relaxation Paramagnetique (Masson, Paris, 1957), Vol. 7.

]. The effective magnetic moment µeff is usually also smaller for TM than for RE species. In a multicomponent medium, the contributions of individual dia- and paramagnetic nuclei usually add up. In a first approximation, a linear mixing rule may be assumed for this, where V = ndiaVdia + nparaVpara, with the molar fraction ni of para- and diamagnetic species, and the Verdet constant Vi of each species. The straightforward approach in the preparation of highly paramagnetic glasses is therefore to find a suitable matrix glass in which very high levels of paramagnetic species can be incorporated without initiating chemical phase separation. However, also strongly nonlinear mixing effects have frequently been observed in the past [5

5. J. J. Rhyne and T. R. McGuire, “Magnetism of rare-earth elements, alloys, and compounds,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 8(1), 105–130 (1972). [CrossRef]

].

Compared to the f-shells of RE ions, the d-shells of TM ions are not isolated from their environment. Therefore, the electronic properties of a TM ion depend strongly on the ligand field. Four types of magnetic coupling may occur in first row TM oxides [6

6. C. Zener, “Interaction between the d-shells in the transition metals. III. Calculation of the Weiss factors in Fe, Co, and Ni,” Phys. Rev. 83(2), 299–301 (1951). [CrossRef]

]: (i) direct exchange between incomplete d-shells of nearest neighbors, (ii) spin coupling between inner d-electrons and electrons of the conduction band of the host, which, since unpopulated at room temperature, can be neglected in glasses, (iii) kinetic coupling of conduction electrons, and (iv) the so-called superexchange through an intermediate species. Other effects, such as the configurational occupation of degenerated twofold and threefold energy levels of d-orbitals (high/low spin states) may additionally influence the magnetic and magneto-optical properties of TM ions in a solid matrix. In an oxide lattice, superexchange is typically the dominant coupling mechanism. For example, the interaction of the d-shells of Mn2+ with the p-orbitals of the O2- ligands usually leads to an antiferromagnetic (AFM) behavior. In crystalline MnO, this is caused by the antiparallel alignment of spins in the Mn2+-O-Mn2+ bridge [7

7. C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).

]. Most of the divalent TM compounds show AFM behavior, e.g. MnO, CoO, FeO, and NiO [8

8. H. Akamatsu, S. Oku, K. Fujita, S. Murai, and K. Tanaka, “Magnetic properties of mixed-valence iron phosphate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B 80(13), 134408 (2009). [CrossRef]

,9

9. R. Reisfeld, A. Kisilev, and C. K. Jørgensen, “Luminescence of manganese(II) in 24 phosphate glasses,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 111(1–2), 19–24 (1984). [CrossRef]

].

Because Mn2+ exhibits one of the highest theoretical magnetic moments of all ion species of the TM group, we focus here on the join of MnPO3-SrPO3 which shows excellent glass formation even at very high Mn2+ content.

2. Experimental

Glasses of the series MnxSr1-x(PO3)2 with x = 0; 0.01; 0.1; 0.2; 0.4; 0.5; 0.6; 0.8 and 1.0 were prepared by melting 50 g batches of the raw materials MnCO3, Sr(H2PO4)2 and NH4H2PO4 in an inductively heated furnace. To prevent the oxidation of Mn2+ species, a reducing atmosphere was established during melting, using alumina crucibles which were placed within SiC-C jackets. As atmospheric oxygen reacts with the crucible jackets to form CO, the ensuing atmosphere in the vicinity of the melt is sufficiently depleted of oxygen to prevent oxidation of Mn2+ ions. The raw materials were homogeneously mixed in a tumbling drum and fed into the crucible, which was preheated to 700°C for 30 min of initial calcination. The temperature was then raised to the fining temperature of 1150°C, where the melt was kept for 20 min before casting into preheated (450°C) graphite moulds. Annealing lasted for 60 min at this temperature before the samples were cooled down to room temperature at a rate of ~2 K/min. Optical transmission spectra were recorded on 1.5 to 3 mm thick, polished, plane parallel sample plates over the range from 200 to 2500 nm with an UV-VIS spectrophotometer, equipped with a 150 mm integration sphere (Lambda 950, Perkin Elmer). Spectra were corrected for reflection loss, normalized, and deconvoluted into Gaussian absorption peaks. The Faraday rotation was also measured on the polished sample plates at room temperature (25°C) over the spectral range of 350 to 850 nm and using a magneto-optical analyzer working at a constant magnetic field strength of 1.5 T (K-250, Jasco). The change in the polarization angle was detected with a precision of 0.005°. The magnetic properties of the samples with x = 0.5 and x = 1.0 were analyzed on powder specimens which were fixed on a non-magnetic polymer sample holder. The temperature dependence of dc and ac susceptibilities was determined with a superconducting quantum interference magnetometer over the temperature range of 1.8 - 300 K (MPMS-XL, Quantum Design). A temperature step-size of 0.1 K was employed in the temperature range of 1.8 - 5 K, 0.5 K for 5 – 10 K, 1 K for 10 – 50 K, and 10 K for 50 – 300 K using field strengths of 0.0 T as reference and of 0.1 T. The data thus obtained were normalized in regard to the sample weight and molar mass.

3. Results and discussion

The glass network of metaphosphate glasses of the join MnPO3-SrPO3 is based on polymer-like chains of phosphate tetrahedra with two bridging and two terminal oxide ions, the Q2 structural units [PO2O2/2] [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

,24

24. N. Zotov, H. Schlenz, B. Brendebach, H. Modrow, J. Hormes, F. Reinauer, R. Glaum, A. Kirfel, and C. Paulmann, “Effects of MnO-doping on the structure of sodium metaphosphate glasses,” Z. Naturforsch. 58a, 419–428 (2003).

,25

25. R. K. Brow, “Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 263–264, 1–28 (2000). [CrossRef]

]. These chains are cross-linked to a higher or lesser extent by the modifier cations. Detailed information on the structure of these glasses is provided in [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to confirm that the samples are amorphous as only a broad undefined glass hump is observed for all glasses of the series. No further sharpening of this glass hump is evident for MnO rich samples.

3.1 Absorption spectroscopy

With increasing Mn2+ content, the glass samples displayed an increasingly orange tint (Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) UV-VIS optical absorption of MnxSr1-x(PO3)2 glasses normalized to sample thickness. (b) Exemplary Gaussian deconvolution of the data for the sample with x = 1, dots represent the experimental, lines the fitted spectrum. Labels in (b) indicate the active electronic level for each transition; transitions A-D are assigned to residual Mn3+-species. Photographs of each sample are displayed above the spectra.
). This tint is attributed to Mn2+ species which show relatively sharp absorption bands around 350 and 415 nm. Furthermore, a weaker broad shoulder extends from the second band up to 550 nm. The assignments of the different bands to electronic d-d transitions of Mn2+ and Mn3+ follow the detailed discussion found in [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

] for the very same glass system. Photoluminescence spectroscopy revealed in the orange to red emission which is typical for octahedrally coordinated Mn2+ (while green emission typically indicates tetrahedrally coordinated Mn2+) [21

21. N. Da, M. Peng, S. Krolikowski, and L. Wondraczek, “Intense red photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped (Na+; Zn2+) sulfophosphate glasses and glass ceramics as LED converters,” Opt. Express 18(3), 2549–2557 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23

23. D. Möncke, E. I. Kamitsos, A. Herrmann, D. Ehrt, and M. Friedrich, “Bonding and ion–ion interactions of Mn2+ ions in fluoride-phosphate and boro-silicate glasses probed by EPR and fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357(14), 2542–2551 (2011). [CrossRef]

,28

28. G. Gao, S. Reibstein, M. Peng, and L. Wondraczek, “Dual-mode photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped Li,Zn-aluminosilicate glass ceramics,” Phys. Chem. Glasses: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B 52(2), 59–63 (2011).

]. This information is the more important, as the electronic ground state 6A1(S) for d5 ions is identical for the tetrahedral and octahedral field. Mn2+ ions take in an oxide environment the high-spin configuration and due to a lack of excited spin sextet terms are all transitions not only Laport forbidden, like all d-d transitions, but additionally also spin-forbidden. This explains the very small molar extinction coefficients of only ~0.2 Lmol−1cm−1 [21

21. N. Da, M. Peng, S. Krolikowski, and L. Wondraczek, “Intense red photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped (Na+; Zn2+) sulfophosphate glasses and glass ceramics as LED converters,” Opt. Express 18(3), 2549–2557 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. In comparison, the molar extinction coefficient of the spin allowed d4 ion Mn3+ is several orders of magnitude higher: even very small traces of Mn3+ can have a strong impact on the absorption spectra and give Mn-doped glasses the typical dark violet to blackish color.

Optical absorption spectroscopy was conducted to quantify the ratio of Mn2+/(Mn2+ + Mn3+), as required for the determination of the magneto-optical FOM. The collected UV-VIS absorption spectra are shown in Fig. 1(a). For x = 0, the UV absorption edge occurs at a wavelength below 300 nm. With increasing x, the bands at 353 and 414 nm gradually increase in intensity for the whole glass series up to x = 1. The shallow orange tail increases analogously in intensity, although small differences in the position of the band maximum indicate another contribution. That is, the d-d transitions of Mn2+ near 440 nm and 540 nm are overlaid by three strong d-d transitions of Mn3+ between 470 and 660 nm. Figure 1(b) shows the Gaussian deconvolution of the absorption spectra which reveals the exact peak positions of all optical transitions for the sample with x = 1. The spectra are in good agreement with those shown in [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

] where the ligand field splitting Dq = 845 cm−1 and the Racah interelectronic repulsion parameter B = 756 cm−1 confirmed that the coordination of Mn2+ is primarily octahedral and that the outer electrons are configured in the high spin state [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

].

The fraction of Mn3+ was calculated from the intensity of the strongest absorption band near 500 nm using the Lambert-Beer law, using an extinction coefficient of 25 Lmol−1cm−1 [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. In this way, it was confirmed that the concentration of Mn3+ is indeed very low, i.e. < 0.1% of the total Mn-content. Its influence on the MO properties and the corresponding FOM was therefore ignored in the following discussion.

3.2 Magnetic properties

The magnetic properties of the glasses were studied as a basis for understanding the MO behavior. Susceptibility data for x = 0, 0.5, and 1.0 are plotted in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Molar susceptibility as a function of temperature for MnxSr1-x(PO3)2 glasses. The inverse molar susceptibility and the graphical determination of the Weiss temperature θW are shown in the inset.
. Paramagnetic behavior over the whole temperature range is observed for all Mn-containing samples. Since field-cooled and zero-field cooled scans coincide with each other within the temperature range of 2 to 10 K and AC measurements did not reveal any frequency dependence of the magnetic behavior, spin glass behavior can be excluded for all temperatures above 1.8 K.

The molar susceptibilities increase with decreasing temperature for x = 0.5 and 1. For x = 0, the typical diamagnetic behavior is observed with only a weak temperature dependence of the susceptibility. While in the high-temperature regime, a somewhat lager χ is found for x = 1 as compared to x = 0.5, an equivalence occurs at ~55 K. In the low temperature regime, the magnitude of χ is significantly higher for x = 0.5.

In order to investigate the magnetic interactions between the Mn2+ ions, the inverse susceptibility is considered in more detail (inset of Fig. 2). For antiferromagnetic materials, the maximum magnetic susceptibility is reached at the Néel temperature TN, the temperature above which an antiferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic material becomes paramagnetic. For crystalline MnO TN is 116 K [29

29. H. Akamatsu, K. Tanaka, K. Fujita, and S. Murai, “Spin dynamics in oxide glass of Fe2O3–Bi2O3–B2O3 system,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310(2), 1506–1507 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Since pure MnO is antiferromagnetic due to the predominance of Mn2+-O-Mn2+ antiferromagnetic interaction, it is assumed that glasses exhibit paramagnetic behavior which might have additional antiferromagnetic contributions [30

30. N. Wiberg, E. Wiberg, and A. F. Holleman, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie (Walther de Gruyter, 2007).

]. Relative to a (fictive) crystal of equivalent chemical composition, in disordered systems, TN shifts to lower values. Moreover, in the present case, the concentration of Mn2+ is lower than in MnO crystals and freezing of randomly oriented magnetic moments should be observed therefore at again lower temperatures [7

7. C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).

,10

10. R. Verhelst, R. Kline, A. de Graat, and H. Hooper, “Magnetic properties of cobalt and manganese aluminosilicate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B 11(11), 4427–4435 (1975). [CrossRef]

,29

29. H. Akamatsu, K. Tanaka, K. Fujita, and S. Murai, “Spin dynamics in oxide glass of Fe2O3–Bi2O3–B2O3 system,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310(2), 1506–1507 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. No magnetic transition is apparent in the studied glass system as Fig. 2 shows no maximum of the magnetic susceptibility or Néel temperature, just as AC and DC measurements exclude spin glass behavior for temperatures above 1.8 K. Possibly, the Néel temperature will be found at even lower temperatures. Above the Néel temperature, the susceptibility of an antiferromagnetic system shows Curie-Weiss paramagnetic behavior. The Curie-Weiss law describes the magnetic susceptibility χ of a ferromagnetic material in the paramagnetic region above the Curie temperature TC. For temperatures T>> TC, the Weiss temperature θw, which is somewhat higher than the Curie point, is used instead of TC:
1χ=T θWC
(1)
where χ is the magnetic susceptibility, T the absolute temperature in K and C the Curie constant with
C=Nµeff23kB
(2)
where N is the Avogadro number, kB is the Boltzmann constant and µeff the effective magnetic moment, which is defined as µeff = 2[S(S + 1)]1/2 µB [7

7. C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).

] with the total spin angular momentum S and the Bohr magneton µB. In cases of high high-spin d5 complexes such as Mn2+ the ground state of should have a magnetic moment close to the spin-only value of ~5.92 µB, since an S-term carries no angular momentum [7

7. C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).

]. The effective magnetic moment in the studied samples, estimated by rearranging Eq. (2), yielded values of 5.32µB and 6.22µB, for the sample with x = 0.5 and x = 1, respectively. For x = 0.5, µeff is lower than the value for the free ion while for x = 1 µeff is somewhat higher. Similar deviations are known from other glass systems [10

10. R. Verhelst, R. Kline, A. de Graat, and H. Hooper, “Magnetic properties of cobalt and manganese aluminosilicate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B 11(11), 4427–4435 (1975). [CrossRef]

,16

16. H. Akamatsu, K. Fujita, S. Murai, and K. Tanaka, “Magneto-optical properties of transparent divalent iron phosphate glasses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(25), 251908 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. The value of µeff depends strongly on the spin state and the coordination of the TM. For octahedral high spin complexes of Mn2+, the orbital moments in the ligand field are effectively quenched, which could have a strong influence on the susceptibility, especially in the low temperature regime, and thus explain the higher value of µeff for x = 1 [7

7. C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).

]. For x = 0.5, the influence of Sr2+ ions on the coupling mechanism has to be considered as well, especially since a mixed cation effect was previously observed in the SrO-MnO-phosphate system [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

].

At lower temperature, Fig. 2 shows a deviation of the magnetic susceptibility from linear behavior. This can be interpreted as a result of short-range order antiferromagnetic correlation. The absolute value of the Weiss temperature |θW| provides a measure of the magnitude of the magnetic interactions. The values of θW and C were estimated by linear extrapolation of the χ−1(T) data to χ−1 = 0 and θW values of −2 K and −26 K were obtained for x = 0.5 and x = 1, respectively. The negative Weiss temperature confirms the antiferromagnetic behavior. As mentioned before, for the glasses with x = 0.5 and x = 1, AC measurements showed no magnetic transitions for temperatures as low as 1.8 K, which is lower than one tenth of |θW|. This indicates that the emergence of long-range magnetically ordered states is suppressed due to some type of magnetic frustration.

The strong antiferromagnetic coupling between Mn2+ ions in crystalline MnO has been mentioned before. The fact that similar effects are weaker in MnO-containing glasses can be explained by the structure of MnO clusters in metaphosphate glasses compared to MnO crystals. It has been shown previously by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy that magnetic coupling becomes dominant when the distance between Mn2+ ions falls below ~4 Å [23

23. D. Möncke, E. I. Kamitsos, A. Herrmann, D. Ehrt, and M. Friedrich, “Bonding and ion–ion interactions of Mn2+ ions in fluoride-phosphate and boro-silicate glasses probed by EPR and fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357(14), 2542–2551 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. Possible configurations of neighboring MnO-octahedra are depicted in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Schematic of the structure of manganese metaphosphate (a) and individual clusters of MnO6 octahedra (b, from top to bottom: corner-sharing, edge-sharing, face-sharing).
. The corresponding Mn-Mn distances are slightly higher than 3 Å in edge-sharing MnO octahedra, which is reflected in an exchange narrowing of the main EPR resonance at g ~2 [23

23. D. Möncke, E. I. Kamitsos, A. Herrmann, D. Ehrt, and M. Friedrich, “Bonding and ion–ion interactions of Mn2+ ions in fluoride-phosphate and boro-silicate glasses probed by EPR and fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357(14), 2542–2551 (2011). [CrossRef]

]. In SrMn(PO3)2 glasses, increasing MnO levels cause the formation of MnO clusters built from an increasing number of corner-sharing MnO octahedra, for which the Mn-Mn distance never falls below 4 Å [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

] (for comparison, crystalline MnO comprises edge-sharing MnO octahedra with a Mn-Mn-distance of ~3 Å). From this, we conclude that direct interaction between neighboring Mn2+ species is not expected to contribute significantly to the magnetic and MO behavior of the present material. Assuming a statistical distribution of Mn2+ ions in the glassy matrix, the distances between the ions would result directly from their volumetric concentration. Then, volumetric concentrations of Mn2+ of ~4.63∙1021 cm−3 for x = 0.5 and ~8.61∙1021 cm−3 for x = 1, result in Mn-Mn distances of ~6.0 Å and ~4.9 Å, respectively. Noteworthy, however, the Mn2+ distribution is not simply statistical. That is, in metaphosphate glasses clusters of corner-sharing MnO octahedra may form already at low dopant concentration [22

22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

].

3.3 Magneto-optical quenching

Figure 4
Fig. 4 Verdet constant of MnxSr1-x(PO3)2 glasses for x = 0, 0.5 and 1.0 as obtained at room temperature and corresponding FOM. The inset depicts the linear fit of V at a wavelength of 500 nm to the molar content of Mn2+ in comparison to vitreous SiO2 [20].
displays the obtained Verdet constant as a function of wavelength for x = 0, 0.5 and 1.0. The value of V follows a quadratic decay function. For the un-doped matrix glass of Sr(PO3)2, V = 7.4 rad T−1 m−1 at a wavelength of 500 nm. With increasing Mn2+ content, the paramagnetic contribution increases and the overall Faraday rotation decreases to a value of V = 6.05 rad T−1 m−1 at 500 nm for x = 1. The individual paramagnetic contribution can be estimated by subtracting the diamagnetic baseline of x = 0 from the data obtained for higher x. For x = 1 the paramagnetic contribution Vpara is about −3.6 rad T−1 m−1 to −0.03 rad T−1 m−1 in the wavelength range between 350 to 850 nm. For comparison, commercial Tb3+-based phosphate glasses exhibit a V value of up to −93 rad T−1 m−1 (room-temperature, 500 nm [31

31. S. J. M. Liu, Photonic Devices (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

]). For x = 0.5, a somewhat higher positive FOM is achieved compared to x = 1 since the optical transmission of this glass is higher although the paramagnetic contribution is lower.

For Mn2+ (d5) high spin complexes, the magnetic moment does not manifest since the ground state in both octahedral and tetrahedral coordination constitutes an Ag-and no Tg-term, but only Tg – terms yield a net magnetic contribution [33

33. S. H. Lin and H. Eyring, “Magneto-optical rotation of transition metal complexes,” J. Chem. Phys. 42(5), 1780–1784 (1965). [CrossRef]

]. On the other hand, for low spin octahedral complexes, participation of the effective magnetic moment in the Faraday rotation could indeed occur since these complexes have a 3T2g ground state. Consequently, higher values of V could develop in the presence of a very strong ligand field and, hence, high Δ0/10Dq. Therefore, other glass compositions with high Mn2+ concentration could be considered to improve the rotation characteristics.

4. Conclusions

In summary, metaphosphate glasses along the join MnxSr1-x(PO3)2 with x = 0...1. Mn2+ were investigated for their magnetic and magneto-optical properties. In these glasses, the matrix is dominated by Q2 phosphate groups. Mn2+ species are present in octahedral coordination with a statistical interionic distance of about 5 - 6 Å, though cluster formation may occur even for low MnO levels and result in effective distances of only ~4 Å. The magnetic interactions between Mn2+ ions are antiferromagnetic, as revealed by a negative Weiss temperature. The magnitude of Faraday rotation was shown to depend strongly on superexchange interaction through Mn2+-O-Mn2+ bridges. In addition, the magneto-optical properties are strongly quenched due to a non-magnetic ground state (Ag – term) and spin forbidden transitions. For these reasons, the overall paramagnetic contribution of Mn2+ remains small as compared to the diamagnetic rotation of the phosphatic matrix itself. Comparing the magnetic properties with the magneto-optical properties lets us expect a significantly stronger paramagnetic rotation at temperatures below 50 K. On the other hand, heavily Mn2+-loaded glasses could be also designed as zero-rotation materials.

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge technical support with glass melting by Dr. Ralf Keding of MPL Erlangen.

References and links

1.

J. Qiu and K. Hirao, “The Faraday effect in diamagnetic glasses,” J. Magn. Reson. 13(05), 1358–1362 (1998).

2.

Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology New Series, III/19, Subvolumes a to i2, Magnetic Properties of Metals (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1986–1992).

3.

Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology New Series, II/2, II/8, II/10, II/11 and II/12a, Coordination and Organometallic Transition Metal Compounds (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1966–1984).

4.

Tables de Constantes et Données Numérique, Relaxation Paramagnetique (Masson, Paris, 1957), Vol. 7.

5.

J. J. Rhyne and T. R. McGuire, “Magnetism of rare-earth elements, alloys, and compounds,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 8(1), 105–130 (1972). [CrossRef]

6.

C. Zener, “Interaction between the d-shells in the transition metals. III. Calculation of the Weiss factors in Fe, Co, and Ni,” Phys. Rev. 83(2), 299–301 (1951). [CrossRef]

7.

C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).

8.

H. Akamatsu, S. Oku, K. Fujita, S. Murai, and K. Tanaka, “Magnetic properties of mixed-valence iron phosphate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B 80(13), 134408 (2009). [CrossRef]

9.

R. Reisfeld, A. Kisilev, and C. K. Jørgensen, “Luminescence of manganese(II) in 24 phosphate glasses,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 111(1–2), 19–24 (1984). [CrossRef]

10.

R. Verhelst, R. Kline, A. de Graat, and H. Hooper, “Magnetic properties of cobalt and manganese aluminosilicate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B 11(11), 4427–4435 (1975). [CrossRef]

11.

J. Pommier, J. Ferré, and S. Senoussi, “Origin of the Faraday effect in a transparent magnetic Mn2+ glass,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 17(31), 5621–5633 (1984). [CrossRef]

12.

W. Nägele, K. Knorr, W. Prandtl, P. Convert, and J. L. Buevoz, “Neutron scattering study of spin correlations and phase transitions in amorphous manganese aluminosilicates,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 11(15), 3295–3305 (1978). [CrossRef]

13.

K. Knorr, R. Geller, and W. Prandl, “Mössbauer and neutron diffraction investigations of magnetic effects in Fe2Ca3Si3O12 and Al2Mn3Si3O12 glasses,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 4(1-4), 258–261 (1977). [CrossRef]

14.

J. Ferré, J. Pommier, J. P. Renard, and K. Knorr, “Magnetic properties of an amorphous insulating spin glass: manganese aluminosilicate,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 13(19), 3697–3711 (1980). [CrossRef]

15.

G. C. Lau, T. Klimczuk, F. Ronning, T. M. McQueen, and R. J. Cava, “Magnetic properties of the garnet and glass forms of Mn3Al2Si3O12,” Phys. Rev. B 80(21), 214414 (2009). [CrossRef]

16.

H. Akamatsu, K. Fujita, S. Murai, and K. Tanaka, “Magneto-optical properties of transparent divalent iron phosphate glasses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(25), 251908 (2008). [CrossRef]

17.

E. H. Williams, “The magnetic properties of some rare earth oxides as a function of the temperature,” Phys. Rev. 12(2), 158–166 (1918). [CrossRef]

18.

M. Yamane and Y. Asahara, Glasses for Photonics (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

19.

M. A. Schmidt, L. Wondraczek, H. W. Lee, N. Granzow, N. Da, and P. St. J. Russell, “Complex Faraday rotation in microstructured magnetooptical fiber waveguides,” Adv. Mater. 23(22-23), 2681–2688 (2011). [CrossRef]

20.

C. B. Rubinstein, S. B. Berger, L. G. Van Uitert, and W. A. Bonner, “Faraday rotation of rare‐earth (III) borate glasses,” J. Appl. Phys. 35(8), 2338–2340 (1964). [CrossRef]

21.

N. Da, M. Peng, S. Krolikowski, and L. Wondraczek, “Intense red photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped (Na+; Zn2+) sulfophosphate glasses and glass ceramics as LED converters,” Opt. Express 18(3), 2549–2557 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]

23.

D. Möncke, E. I. Kamitsos, A. Herrmann, D. Ehrt, and M. Friedrich, “Bonding and ion–ion interactions of Mn2+ ions in fluoride-phosphate and boro-silicate glasses probed by EPR and fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357(14), 2542–2551 (2011). [CrossRef]

24.

N. Zotov, H. Schlenz, B. Brendebach, H. Modrow, J. Hormes, F. Reinauer, R. Glaum, A. Kirfel, and C. Paulmann, “Effects of MnO-doping on the structure of sodium metaphosphate glasses,” Z. Naturforsch. 58a, 419–428 (2003).

25.

R. K. Brow, “Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 263–264, 1–28 (2000). [CrossRef]

26.

P. A. Bingham and R. J. Hand, “Sulphate incorporation and glass formation in phosphate systems for nuclear and toxic waste immobilization,” Mater. Res. Bull. 43(7), 1679–1693 (2008). [CrossRef]

27.

P. C. Schultz, “Optical absorption of the transition elements in vitreous silica,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57(7), 309–313 (1974). [CrossRef]

28.

G. Gao, S. Reibstein, M. Peng, and L. Wondraczek, “Dual-mode photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped Li,Zn-aluminosilicate glass ceramics,” Phys. Chem. Glasses: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B 52(2), 59–63 (2011).

29.

H. Akamatsu, K. Tanaka, K. Fujita, and S. Murai, “Spin dynamics in oxide glass of Fe2O3–Bi2O3–B2O3 system,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310(2), 1506–1507 (2007). [CrossRef]

30.

N. Wiberg, E. Wiberg, and A. F. Holleman, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie (Walther de Gruyter, 2007).

31.

S. J. M. Liu, Photonic Devices (Cambridge University Press, 2009).

32.

J. H. Van Vleck and M. H. Hebb, “On the paramagnetic rotation of tysonite,” Phys. Rev. 46(1), 17–32 (1934). [CrossRef]

33.

S. H. Lin and H. Eyring, “Magneto-optical rotation of transition metal complexes,” J. Chem. Phys. 42(5), 1780–1784 (1965). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.2750) Materials : Glass and other amorphous materials
(160.3820) Materials : Magneto-optical materials

ToC Category:
Magneto-optic Materials

History
Original Manuscript: November 26, 2012
Revised Manuscript: January 3, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: January 7, 2013
Published: January 8, 2013

Citation
A. Winterstein, H. Akamatsu, D. Möncke, K. Tanaka, M. A. Schmidt, and L. Wondraczek, "Magnetic and magneto-optical quenching in (Mn2+, Sr2+) metaphosphate glasses," Opt. Mater. Express 3, 184-193 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ome/abstract.cfm?URI=ome-3-2-184


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Qiu and K. Hirao, “The Faraday effect in diamagnetic glasses,” J. Magn. Reson.13(05), 1358–1362 (1998).
  2. Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology New Series, III/19, Subvolumes a to i2, Magnetic Properties of Metals (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1986–1992).
  3. Landolt-Börnstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology New Series, II/2, II/8, II/10, II/11 and II/12a, Coordination and Organometallic Transition Metal Compounds (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1966–1984).
  4. Tables de Constantes et Données Numérique, Relaxation Paramagnetique (Masson, Paris, 1957), Vol. 7.
  5. J. J. Rhyne and T. R. McGuire, “Magnetism of rare-earth elements, alloys, and compounds,” IEEE Trans. Magn.8(1), 105–130 (1972). [CrossRef]
  6. C. Zener, “Interaction between the d-shells in the transition metals. III. Calculation of the Weiss factors in Fe, Co, and Ni,” Phys. Rev.83(2), 299–301 (1951). [CrossRef]
  7. C. Kittel, Einführung in die Festkörperphysik (Oldenburg Verlag, 1995).
  8. H. Akamatsu, S. Oku, K. Fujita, S. Murai, and K. Tanaka, “Magnetic properties of mixed-valence iron phosphate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B80(13), 134408 (2009). [CrossRef]
  9. R. Reisfeld, A. Kisilev, and C. K. Jørgensen, “Luminescence of manganese(II) in 24 phosphate glasses,” Chem. Phys. Lett.111(1–2), 19–24 (1984). [CrossRef]
  10. R. Verhelst, R. Kline, A. de Graat, and H. Hooper, “Magnetic properties of cobalt and manganese aluminosilicate glasses,” Phys. Rev. B11(11), 4427–4435 (1975). [CrossRef]
  11. J. Pommier, J. Ferré, and S. Senoussi, “Origin of the Faraday effect in a transparent magnetic Mn2+ glass,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys.17(31), 5621–5633 (1984). [CrossRef]
  12. W. Nägele, K. Knorr, W. Prandtl, P. Convert, and J. L. Buevoz, “Neutron scattering study of spin correlations and phase transitions in amorphous manganese aluminosilicates,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys.11(15), 3295–3305 (1978). [CrossRef]
  13. K. Knorr, R. Geller, and W. Prandl, “Mössbauer and neutron diffraction investigations of magnetic effects in Fe2Ca3Si3O12 and Al2Mn3Si3O12 glasses,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.4(1-4), 258–261 (1977). [CrossRef]
  14. J. Ferré, J. Pommier, J. P. Renard, and K. Knorr, “Magnetic properties of an amorphous insulating spin glass: manganese aluminosilicate,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys.13(19), 3697–3711 (1980). [CrossRef]
  15. G. C. Lau, T. Klimczuk, F. Ronning, T. M. McQueen, and R. J. Cava, “Magnetic properties of the garnet and glass forms of Mn3Al2Si3O12,” Phys. Rev. B80(21), 214414 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. H. Akamatsu, K. Fujita, S. Murai, and K. Tanaka, “Magneto-optical properties of transparent divalent iron phosphate glasses,” Appl. Phys. Lett.92(25), 251908 (2008). [CrossRef]
  17. E. H. Williams, “The magnetic properties of some rare earth oxides as a function of the temperature,” Phys. Rev.12(2), 158–166 (1918). [CrossRef]
  18. M. Yamane and Y. Asahara, Glasses for Photonics (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
  19. M. A. Schmidt, L. Wondraczek, H. W. Lee, N. Granzow, N. Da, and P. St. J. Russell, “Complex Faraday rotation in microstructured magnetooptical fiber waveguides,” Adv. Mater.23(22-23), 2681–2688 (2011). [CrossRef]
  20. C. B. Rubinstein, S. B. Berger, L. G. Van Uitert, and W. A. Bonner, “Faraday rotation of rare‐earth (III) borate glasses,” J. Appl. Phys.35(8), 2338–2340 (1964). [CrossRef]
  21. N. Da, M. Peng, S. Krolikowski, and L. Wondraczek, “Intense red photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped (Na+; Zn2+) sulfophosphate glasses and glass ceramics as LED converters,” Opt. Express18(3), 2549–2557 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. I. Konidakis, C. Varsamis, E. I. Kamitsos, D. Möncke, and D. Ehrt, “Structure and properties of mixed strontium-manganese metaphosphate glasses,” J. Phys. Chem. C114(19), 9125–9138 (2010). [CrossRef]
  23. D. Möncke, E. I. Kamitsos, A. Herrmann, D. Ehrt, and M. Friedrich, “Bonding and ion–ion interactions of Mn2+ ions in fluoride-phosphate and boro-silicate glasses probed by EPR and fluorescence spectroscopy,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids357(14), 2542–2551 (2011). [CrossRef]
  24. N. Zotov, H. Schlenz, B. Brendebach, H. Modrow, J. Hormes, F. Reinauer, R. Glaum, A. Kirfel, and C. Paulmann, “Effects of MnO-doping on the structure of sodium metaphosphate glasses,” Z. Naturforsch.58a, 419–428 (2003).
  25. R. K. Brow, “Review: the structure of simple phosphate glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids263–264, 1–28 (2000). [CrossRef]
  26. P. A. Bingham and R. J. Hand, “Sulphate incorporation and glass formation in phosphate systems for nuclear and toxic waste immobilization,” Mater. Res. Bull.43(7), 1679–1693 (2008). [CrossRef]
  27. P. C. Schultz, “Optical absorption of the transition elements in vitreous silica,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc.57(7), 309–313 (1974). [CrossRef]
  28. G. Gao, S. Reibstein, M. Peng, and L. Wondraczek, “Dual-mode photoluminescence from Mn2+-doped Li,Zn-aluminosilicate glass ceramics,” Phys. Chem. Glasses: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B52(2), 59–63 (2011).
  29. H. Akamatsu, K. Tanaka, K. Fujita, and S. Murai, “Spin dynamics in oxide glass of Fe2O3–Bi2O3–B2O3 system,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.310(2), 1506–1507 (2007). [CrossRef]
  30. N. Wiberg, E. Wiberg, and A. F. Holleman, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie (Walther de Gruyter, 2007).
  31. S. J. M. Liu, Photonic Devices (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  32. J. H. Van Vleck and M. H. Hebb, “On the paramagnetic rotation of tysonite,” Phys. Rev.46(1), 17–32 (1934). [CrossRef]
  33. S. H. Lin and H. Eyring, “Magneto-optical rotation of transition metal complexes,” J. Chem. Phys.42(5), 1780–1784 (1965). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited