Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Applied Spectroscopy
  • Vol. 62,
  • Issue 9,
  • pp. 1013-1021
  • (2008)

Removal of Surface Reflection from Above-Water Visible–Near Infrared Spectroscopic Measurements

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Water quality estimation in fresh and marine water systems with <i>in situ</i> above-water spectroscopy requires measurement of the volume reflectance (ρ<sub>v</sub>) of water bodies. However, the above-water radiometric measurements include surface reflection (<i>L</i><sub>r</sub>) as a significant component along with volume reflection. The <i>L</i><sub>r</sub> carries no information on water quality, and hence it is considered as a major source of error in <i>in situ</i> above-water spectroscopy. Currently, there are no methods to directly measure <i>L</i><sub>r</sub>. The common method to estimate <i>L</i><sub>r</sub> assumes a constant water surface reflectance (ρ<sub>s</sub>) of 2%, and then subtracts the <i>L</i><sub>r</sub> thus calculated from the above-water radiance measurements to obtain the volume reflection (<i>L</i><sub>v</sub>). The problem with this method is that the amount of ρ<sub>s</sub> varies with environmental conditions. Therefore, a methodology was developed in this study for direct measurement of water volume reflectance above water at nadir view geometry. Other objectives of this study were to analyze the contribution of L<sub>r</sub> to the total water reflectance under various environmental conditions in a controlled setup and to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model to estimate ρ<sub>s</sub> from environmental conditions. The results showed that <i>L</i><sub>r</sub> contributed 20–54% of total upwelling radiance from water at nadir. The ρ<sub>s</sub> was highly variable with environmental conditions. Using sun altitude, wind speed, diffuse lighting, and wavelength as inputs, the ANN model was able to accurately simulate ρ<sub>s</sub>, with a low root mean square error of 0.003. A sensitivity analysis with the ANN model indicated that sun altitude and diffuse light had the highest influence on ρ<sub>s</sub>, contributing to over 82% of predictability of the ANN model. Therefore, the ANN modeling framework can be an accurate tool for estimating surface reflectance in applications that require volume reflectance of water.

PDF Article
More Like This
Revised spectral optimization approach to remove surface-reflected radiance for the estimation of remote-sensing reflectance from the above-water method

Junfang Lin, Zhongping Lee, Gavin H. Tilstone, Xiaohan Liu, Jianwei Wei, Michael Ondrusek, and Steve Groom
Opt. Express 31(14) 22964-22981 (2023)

Estimation of the remote-sensing reflectance from above-surface measurements

Curtis D. Mobley
Appl. Opt. 38(36) 7442-7455 (1999)

Transfer model to determine the above-water remote-sensing reflectance from the underwater remote-sensing ratio

Shun Bi, Rüdiger Röttgers, and Martin Hieronymi
Opt. Express 31(6) 10512-10524 (2023)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.