Abstract
Super-resolution in imaging through a transparent spherical microlens has attracted lots of attention because of recent promising experimental results with remarkable resolution improvement. To provide physical insight for this super-resolution phenomenon, previous studies adopted a phenomenological explanation mainly based on the super-focusing effect of a photonic nanojet, while a direct imaging calculation with classical imaging theory has rarely been studied. Here we theoretically model the imaging process through a microlens with vectorial electromagnetic analysis, and then exclude the previously plausible explanation of super-resolution based on the super-focusing effect. The results showed that, in the context of classical imaging theory subject to the two-point resolution criterion, a microlens with a perfect spherical shape cannot achieve the experimentally verified sub-100 nm resolution. Therefore, there must be some other physical mechanisms that contribute to the reported ultrahigh resolution but have not been revealed in theory.
© 2013 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Kedi Wu and Guo Ping Wang
Opt. Lett. 38(12) 2032-2034 (2013)
Xiang Hao, Cuifang Kuang, Zhaotai Gu, Shuai Li, Jianhong Ge, and Xu Liu
Opt. Lett. 38(6) 1001-1003 (2013)
Sourangsu Banerji, Monjurul Meem, Apratim Majumder, Berardi Sensale-Rodriguez, and Rajesh Menon
Opt. Lett. 45(22) 6158-6161 (2020)