OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editor: Gregory W. Faris
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 2 — Jan. 21, 2010

High resolution image acquisition from magnetic resonance and computed tomography scans using the curvelet fusion algorithm with inverse interpolation techniques

Fatma E. Ali, Ibrahim M. El-Dokany, Abdelfattah A. Saad, Waleed Al-Nuaimy, and Fathi E. Abd El-Samie  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 114-125 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.000114


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (938 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present a new approach, based on the curvelet transform, for the fusion of magnetic resonance and computed tomography images. The objective of this fusion process is to obtain images, with as much detail as possible, for medical diagnosis. This approach is based on the application of the additive wavelet transform on both images and the segmentation of their detail planes into small overlapping tiles. The ridgelet transform is then applied on each of these tiles, and the fusion process is performed on the ridgelet transforms of the tiles. To maximize the benefit of the fused images, inverse interpolation techniques are used to obtain high resolution images from the low resolution fused images. Three inverse interpolation techniques are presented and compared. Simulation results show the superiority of the proposed curvelet fusion approach to the traditional discrete wavelet transform fusion technique. Results also reveal that inverse interpolation techniques have succeeded in obtaining high resolution images from the fused images with better quality than that of the traditional cubic spline interpolation technique.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.0100) Image processing : Image processing
(110.0110) Imaging systems : Imaging systems

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: July 7, 2009
Revised Manuscript: October 12, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: November 10, 2009
Published: December 24, 2009

Virtual Issues
Vol. 5, Iss. 2 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Fatma E. Ali, Ibrahim M. El-Dokany, Abdelfattah A. Saad, Waleed Al-Nuaimy, and Fathi E. Abd El-Samie, "High resolution image acquisition from magnetic resonance and computed tomography scans using the curvelet fusion algorithm with inverse interpolation techniques," Appl. Opt. 49, 114-125 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-49-1-114


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Moustafa and S. Rehan, “Applying image fusion techniques for the detection of hepatic lesions and acute intra-cerebral hemorrhage,” in ITI 4th International Conference on Information and Communications Technology 2006 (IEEE, 2006). [CrossRef]
  2. A. Wang, H. J. Sun, and Y. Y. Guan, “The application of wavelet transform to multi-modality medical image fusion,” in IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (IEEE, 2006), pp. 270-274. [CrossRef]
  3. C. Pohl and J. L. van Genderen, “Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and application,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 19, 823-854 (1998). [CrossRef]
  4. A. A. Goshtasby and S. Nikolov, “Image fusion: advances in the state of the art,” Inf. Fusion 8, 114-118 (2007). [CrossRef]
  5. M. Ouendeno, “Image fusion for improved perception,” Ph.D. dissertation (Florida Institute of Technology, 2007).
  6. M. Choi, R. Y. Kim, M.-R. Nam, and H. O. Kim, “Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic satellite images using the curvelet transform,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2, 136-140 (2005). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Choi, R. Y. Kim, and M.-G. Kim, “The curvelet transform for image fusion,” in ISPRS Congress Istanbul 2004, Proceedings of the Youth Forum, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Sciences (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2004), Vol. 35-B8, pp. 59-64.
  8. S. Li, J. T. Kwok, and Y. Wang, “Using the discrete wavelet frame transform to merge Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic images,” Inf. Fusion 3, 17-23 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. S. M. Elkaffas, T. A. El-Tobely, A. M. Ragheb, and F. E. Abd El-Samie, “An integrated IHS and DWFT fusion technique for improving the spectral quality of remote sensing images,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO)(IEEE, 2006), pp. 54-61.
  10. Y. Zhang and G. Hong, “An IHS and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour IKONOS and QuickBird images,” Inf. Fusion 6, 225-234 (2005). [CrossRef]
  11. S. Udomhunsakul and P. Wongsita, “Feature extraction in medical MRI images,” in Proceeding of 2004 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (IEEE, 2004), Vol. 1, pp. 340-344.
  12. L. Hui., “Multi-sensor imager registration and fusion,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of California, 1993).
  13. E. Canga, “Image fusion,” M.S. thesis (University of Bath, 2002).
  14. A. ben Hamza, Y. He, H. Krim, and A. Willsky, “A multiscale approach to pixel-level image fusion,” in Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering (IOS Press, 2005), Vol. 12, pp. 135-146.
  15. Y. Shen, J. C. Ma, and L. Y. Ma, “An adaptive pixel weighted image fusion algorithm based on local priority for CT and MRI images,” in IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE, 2006), pp. 420-422. [CrossRef]
  16. J. L. Starck, E. Candes, and D. L. Donoho, “The curvelet transform for image denoising,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11, 670-684 (2002). [CrossRef]
  17. G. Y. Chen and B. Kegl, “Image denoising with complex ridgelets,” Pattern Recogn. 578-585 (2007). [CrossRef]
  18. J.-L. Starck, P. Abrial, Y. Moudden, and M. K. Nguyen, “Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets on the sphere,” Astron. Astrophys. 446, 1191-1204 (2006). [CrossRef]
  19. F. E. Ali, I. M. El-Dokany, A. A. Saad, and F. E. Abd El-Samie, “Curvelet fusion of MR and CT images,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 3, 215-224 (2008). [CrossRef]
  20. C. Chao and J. Tao, “Study of image magnification based on curvelet transformation,” in ISPRS Congress Beijing 2008, Proceedings of Commission II, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Spatial Information Sciences (International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2008), Vol. 37-B2, pp. 289-292
  21. J. Nunez, X. Otazu, O. Fors, A. Prades, V. Pala, and R. Arbiol, “Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 37, 1204-1211 (1999). [CrossRef]
  22. B. B. Saevarsson, J. R. Sveinsson, and J. A. Benediktsson, “Combined wavelet and curvelet denoising of SAR images,” in IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (IEEE, 2004), Vol. 6, pp. 4235-4238.
  23. S. E. El-Khamy, M. M. Hadhoud, M. I. Dessouky, B. M. Salam, and F. E. Abd El-Samie, “A new approach for adaptive polynomial based image interpolation,” Int. J. Inf. Acquisition 3, 139-159 (2006). [CrossRef]
  24. S. E. El-Khamy, M. M. Hadhoud, M. I. Dessouky, B. M. Sallam, and F. E. Abd El-Samie, “Efficient implementation of image interpolation as an inverse problem,” J. Digital Signal Process. 15(2), 137-152 (2005). [CrossRef]
  25. G. Piella, “New quality measures for image fusion,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Fusion (Swedish Defence Research Agency, 2004), pp. 542-546.
  26. G. Piella and H. Heijmans, “A new quality metric for image fusion,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 2003), Vol. 3, pp. 173-176.
  27. Z. Wang, H. R. Sheikh, and A. C. Bovik, “No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images,” in Proceedings of IEEE 2002 International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 2002), pp. 477-480. [CrossRef]
  28. S. E. Ghrare, M. A. M. Ali, M. Ismail, and K. Jumari, “Diagnostic quality evaluation of compressed medical images for telemedicine applications,” Infosystems , March 2008, pp. 15-19.
  29. T. Kratochvil and P. Simicek, “Utilization of MATLAB for picture quality evaluation” ( Institute of Radio Electronics, Brno University of Technology, 2005).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited