OSA's Digital Library

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

| EXPLORING THE INTERFACE OF LIGHT AND BIOMEDICINE

  • Editors: Andrew Dunn and Anthony Durkin
  • Vol. 8, Iss. 10 — Nov. 8, 2013

Noise-aware image deconvolution with multidirectional filters

Hang Yang, Ming Zhu, Heyan Huang, and Zhongbo Zhang  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 27, pp. 6792-6798 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.006792


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1537 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In this paper we propose an approach for handling noise in deconvolution algorithm based on multidirectional filters. Most image deconvolution techniques are sensitive to the noise. Even a small amount of noise will degrade the quality of image estimation dramatically. We found that by applying a directional low-pass filter to the blurred image, we can reduce the noise level while preserving the blur information in the orthogonal direction to the filter. So we apply a series of directional filters at different orientations to the blurred image, and a guided filter based edge-preserving image deconvolution is used to estimate an accurate Radon transform of the clear image from each filtered image. Finally, we reconstruct the original image using the inverse Radon transform. We compare our deconvolution algorithm with many competitive deconvolution techniques in terms of the improvement in signal-to-noise ratio and visual quality.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.0100) Image processing : Image processing
(100.1830) Image processing : Deconvolution
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: July 17, 2013
Revised Manuscript: August 26, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: August 27, 2013
Published: September 18, 2013

Virtual Issues
Vol. 8, Iss. 10 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Hang Yang, Ming Zhu, Heyan Huang, and Zhongbo Zhang, "Noise-aware image deconvolution with multidirectional filters," Appl. Opt. 52, 6792-6798 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/vjbo/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-52-27-6792


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. K. Jain, Fundamental of Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, 1989), pp. 267–341.
  2. A. K. Katsaggelos, ed., Digital Image Restoration (Springer, 1991), pp. 24–41.
  3. P. C. Hansen, Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion (SIAM, 1998).
  4. R. Neelamani, H. Choi, and R. G. Baraniuk, “ForWaRD: Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution for ill-conditioned systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 52, 418–433 (2004). [CrossRef]
  5. J. Starck, M. K. Nguyen, and F. Murtagh, “Wavelets and curvelets for image deconvolution: a combined approach,” Signal Process. 83, 2279–2283 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. V. M. Patel, G. R. Easley, and D. M. Healy, “Shearlet-based deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18, 2673–2685 (2009). [CrossRef]
  7. H. Yang and Z. Zhang, “Fusion of wave atom-based wiener shrinkage filter and joint non-local means filter for texture-preserving image deconvolution” Opt. Eng. 51, 067009 (2012). [CrossRef]
  8. L. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,” Physica D 60, 259–268 (1992). [CrossRef]
  9. T. Chan, S. Esedoglu, F. Park, and A. Yip, “Recent developments in total variation image restoration,” Handbook of Mathematical Models in Computer Vision (Springer, 2005).
  10. Y. Wang, J. Yang, W. Yin, and Y. Zhang, “A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction,” SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 1, 248–272 (2008). [CrossRef]
  11. J. Oliveira, J. M. Bioucas-Dias, and M. A. Figueiredo, “Adaptive total variation image deblurring: a majorization-minimization approach,” Signal Process. 89, 1683–1693 (2009). [CrossRef]
  12. O. V. Michailovich, “An iterative shrinkage approach to total-variation image restoration,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 1281–1299 (2011). [CrossRef]
  13. I. Daubechies, M. Defrise, and C. De Mol, “An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57, 1413–1457 (2004). [CrossRef]
  14. A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,” SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 2, 183–202 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Bioucas-Dias and M. Figueiredo, “A new TwIST: two-step iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithms for image restoration,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 2992–3004 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. J. A. Guerrero-Colon, L. Mancera, and J. Portilla, “Image restoration using space-variant Gaussian scale mixtures in overcomplete pyramids,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 27–41 (2008). [CrossRef]
  17. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 2080–2095 (2007). [CrossRef]
  18. K. Dabove, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “Image restoration by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering,” Proc. SPIE 6812, 681207 (2008). [CrossRef]
  19. J. Mairal, M. Elad, and G. Sapiro, “Sparse representation for color image restoration,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 53–69 (2008). [CrossRef]
  20. R. Rubinstein, A. M. Bruckstein, and M. Elad, “Dictionaries for sparse representation modeling,” Proc. IEEE 98, 1045–1057 (2010). [CrossRef]
  21. L. Yuan, J. Sun, L. Quan, and H.-Y. Shum, “Progressive inter-scale and intra-scale non-blind image deconvolution,” ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 74 (2008). [CrossRef]
  22. J. Portilla, “Image restoration through l0 analysis-based sparse optimization in tight frames,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 2009), pp. 3909–3912.
  23. Z. Ming, Z. Wei, and W. g. Zhile, “Satellite image deconvolution based on nonlocal means,” Appl. Opt. 49, 6286–6294 (2010). [CrossRef]
  24. J. Ni, P. Turaga, V. M. Patel, and R. Chellappa, “Example-driven manifold priors for image deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 3086–3096 (2011). [CrossRef]
  25. F. Xue, F. Luisier, and T. Blu, “Multi-Wiener SURE-LET deconvolution,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22, 1954–1968 (2013). [CrossRef]
  26. H. Yang, M. Zhu, Z. Zhang, and H. Huang, “Guided filter based edge-preserving image non-blind deconvolution,” in Proceedings of 20th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 2013).
  27. P. Toft, “The Radon transform—theory and implementation,” Ph.D. thesis (Technical University of Denmark, 1996).
  28. K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang, “Guided image filtering,” in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision: Part I, Heidelberg (2010), pp. 1–14.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited