A common goal of most Raman spectroscopists is the acquisition of clear Raman spectra in short integration times. It is paramount, then, that the hardware used in a Raman system be optimized for throughput, signal-to-noise ratio, and resolution. To this end, we performed a systematic comparison of two Raman spectrographs: the widely used Kaiser HoloSpec™ and a relatively new commercial offering, the Raman Explorer™ by Headwall Photonics. Both strong and weak Raman scattering samples were measured using various launching conditions. When resolution-matched, the throughputs of both spectrographs were found to be roughly similar over the central range of the fingerprint region (approximately 800 to 1140 cm−1, using 785 nm illumination), with the Raman Explorer™ demonstrating a slight throughput advantage outside this range. Other factors are also considered such that end users may better select the optimum spectrograph for their particular application.
Vol. 3, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics
Chad A. Lieber, Elizabeth M. Kanter, and Anita Mahadevan-Jansen, "Comparison of Raman Spectrograph Throughput Using Two Commercial Systems: Transmissive Versus Reflective," Appl. Spectrosc. 62, 575-582 (2008)
References are not available for this paper.
OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.